DOCSLIB.ORG

Graphene and Quantum Hall (2+1)D Physics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Graphene and Quantum Hall (2+1)D Physics The 4th QMMRC-IPCMS Winter School 2 8 Feb 2011, ECC, Seoul, Korea Outline Lecture 1. Electronic structures of graphene and bilayer graphene Lecture 2. Electrons in graphitic systems with magnetic fields Graphene and Quantum Hall (2+1)D Physics Young-Woo Son Korea Institute for Advanced Study, Seoul, Korea 3 QUANTUM MECHANICS TWO OUT OF MANY FOUNDERS Lecture 1 Schrödinger Equation Electronic Structures of Graphene and Bilayer Graphene Dirac Equation QUANTUM MECHANICS QUANTUM MECHANICS FOR FREE PARTICLES CONSEQUENCE OF DIRAC’S EQ. Schrödinger Equation Dirac Equation (Particle) (Anti-Particle) Dirac Equation (Particle) IF m = 0 (Anti-Particle) 7 8 CarbonWhat is allotropesgraphene? Why Carbon? - Carbon allotropes Graphene 21C? Intel CPU 1960~ The first 1947~ transistor This slides is inspired by T. Ohta at LBNL and Fritz-Haber-Institut. = 9 mc Brief history of graphene Electronic structure of graphene 10 - Early works - Isolation of graphene ? • Intercalated graphite as a route to graphene ! L. M. Vicilis et al, Science 299, 1361 (2003). • Graphene nano-pencil ? (P. Kim@Columbia) = mc 12 Electronic structure of graphene 11 Exfoliated Graphene - Isolation of graphene ? - Breakthrough • Micromechanical cleavage of bulk graphite up to 100 micrometer in size via adhesive tapes ! Novoselov et al, Science 306, 666 (2004) 윤두희, 정현식(서강대) A. K. Geim Group @ Menchester P. Kim Group @ Columbia KSNK. S. Novose lov etlt al, NtNature 438, 197 (2005) YZhY. Zhang etlt al, NtNature 438, 201 (2005) 020.2 μm BRIEF HISTORY OF GRAPHENE FEW FACTS ON GRAPHENE NOBEL PRIZE Density: 0.77 mg/m2 BkitBreaking streng th42N/th: 42 N/m (Hypothetical steel of graphene thickness~0.4 N/m) Theoreti ca l RT mobilit y: 200, 000 cm2V-1s -1 f10for n=1012/cm-2 •Strongggest materials ever measured : Young’s modulus 1.0 Tpa • Thinnest flexible membrane ever created • Impermeable to gases (even atomic hydrogen) • Record value for RT thermal conductivity of ~5000 W/mK • Ballistic transport over micrometers at RT • Current density two order of magnitude higher than that of Cu • Room temperature Quantum Hall Effects • Unique material showing something exotics at RT 15 16 Electronic structure of graphene Electronic structure of graphene - Nature of bonds in graphene - Real space: tight-binding Hamiltonian A sp2 sp3 a2 π-orbital s1 B s σ-bond 3 s2 a 1 Two sublattices - Bipartite system Nearest-neighbor tight-binding Hamiltonian for π-orbitals Hexagonal network of Carbon TEM imagg,e, Zettl group at UC Berkeley – sp2 bonding C. Girit et al. Science 323, 170 (2009) 17 Electronic structure of graphene Electronic structure of graphene - Energy spectrum - Linear energy bands K+ K− • Two inequivalent • Hexagonal BZ with two special Dirac cones at K FiitFermi points, and K’ 18 19 20 Electronic structure of graphene Electronic structure of graphene - Real space - ‘Neutrino’ in your pencil? A B p ‐t x p y Dirac equa tion w ith zero mass charged ‘neutrino’ in your pencil? • Relativistic particle : (()Pseudo) (()Pseudo) Two sublatticesSpin Up - BipartiteSpin Down system c=vF: effective speed of ‘light’ m=0 21 22 Gap in graphene Gap in graphene - Linear bands? - Linear bands? Linear band? Is that true? Yes from QHE ( If including NNI t’, ) MOST direct answer : ARPES measurement of suspended graphene does NOT published until now (now - I wrote in Dec 2008) ELECTRONS IN GRAPHENE Quasi-particle spectrum of graphene 24 DIRECT OBSERVATION - IR measurements Angle Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Graphene Typical Semiconductor Z. Q. Li et al, Nature Phys 4, 532 (08) ((pEpitaxial ggpraphene on SiC(000-1) (Indium Nitride surface states) • Strong renormalization of group velocities near Dirac points Sprinkle et al, Colakerol et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 226803 (2009) Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 237601 (2006) 25 Electronic structure of graphene Electronic structure of graphene - Energy spectrum - Total Hamiltonian K+ s=+ K- K+ K+ s= - K− • Hexagonal BZ with two special FiitFermi points, K− with σ acts on sublattice A (B) and τ on K+ (K-) 26 28 Electronic structure of graphene Electronic structure of graphene - Gap generation in graphene - Consequences of massless Dirac fermions Linear Density of States E E 0 0 k N2D(E) Onsite energy difference Mixing between K+ and K- - Mixing pseudo-spins - Mixing chiralities |2α| |2β| 27 Zhang et al, Novoselov et al (05) Transport properties of graphene 29 Electronic structure of graphene - Mobility of graphene - Low energy dispersions Mo bility o f suspen de d graphene ~ 200, 000 cm2/Vs Graphene Usual Semiconductor Observation of nearlyypg ballistic transport regime/ FQHE X. Du et al, Nature Nanotech. 3, 491 (2008). X. Du et al, Nature 462, 192 (2009). K. I. Bolotin et al. SSC 146, 351 (2008) K. I. Bolotin et al. Nature 462, 196 (2009) 31 Electronic structure of graphene Electronic structure of graphene - Pseudospin and chiral states - Berry’s phase Eigenfunctions : Spinor representation K py K py + + for a path of C at K+ and K- px θp px θp Pseudo-spin up (down): A (B) sublattice 33 Electronic structure of graphene Electronic structure of graphene - Chiral states: charged “neutrino” in your pencil - Consequence of chirality HliitHelicity operator : • Eigenstates : • Conduction band : • For a long-range disorder where K+ a elastic scattering matrix element is : Complete absence of backscattering σ = -1/2 σ =+1/2= +1/2 x -e x (di(pseudospin conserva ti)tion) p < 0 p > 0 x x • Klein paradox: M. I. Katsnelson et al,,y Nature Phys. 2,,() 620 (2006) • Veselago lens: V. V. Cheianov et al, Science 315, 1252 (2007) 34 = mc 36 Electronic structure of graphene Electronic structure of graphene - Scattering - Tunneling K+ K- K+ K− • Intra-valley scattering: small momentum transfer, lattice distortion, etc. • ItInter-valley sca tter ing: large momen tum transf er, s hor t range a tom ic impurities, etc A. K. Geim & P. Kim Scientific American, Apr. 2008 Electronic structure of graphene 37 Electronic structure of graphene 38 - Klein paradox - Klein tunneling Graphene particle ~ 2 mc 2 antiparticle • Klein paradox: Unimpeded penetration of relativistic particles through very high potential barriers. Katsnelson et al, Nature Phys. 2, 620 (2006) 2 = 8 • Potential drop ~ 2 mc over mc : ~10 V/Å V. V. Cheianov et al, Science 315, 1252 (2007) … → Event horizon of Black hole C. Park, Y.-W. Son et al, Nature Phys. (2008), → Supercritical massive atoms Phys. Rev. Lett. (2008), O. Klein, Z. Phys. 53, 157 (1929) Nano Lett (2008) Electronic structure of graphene 39 Transport properties of graphene 40 - Klein tunneling - Klein tunneling Pabry-Ferot interference: observation ofBf Berry ’s p hase A. F. Young & P. Kim, Nature Phys. 5, 222 (2009). N. Stander, B. Huard, D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 026807 (2009) Katsnelson et al, Nature Phys. 2, 620 (2006) V. V. Cheianov et al, Science 315, 1252 (2007) Electronic structure of graphene 41 Electronic structure of graphene 42 - Opacity - Opacity graphene SiScience 320, 1308 (2008) ω TittTransmittance ~ 97.7% 44 What is bilayer graphene? Electronic structure of graphene - Pseudospin and chiral states Nearest neighbor hopping (t) between A and B sublattices Normal material Neutrino Graphene Bilayer Graphene • Only single layer graphene has a linear dispersion. • All others are massive, i.e., almost normal metals But, Pseudo-spin up (down): A (B) sublattice 45 46 Bilayer graphene Bilayer graphene : Massive chiral particles : Massive chiral particles H. Min et al, PRB 75, 155115 (07) Min ima l mo de l: Two coupled single layer graphene Low energy effective Hamiltonian projected on a spinor space for the with dimer couplings A1-B2 (Bernal two layers of bilayer graphene (σ acts on layers): stacking) spin up (down) upper (lower) layer 47 Single and bilayer graphene Bilayer graphene : Massless and massive chiral particles : Massive chiral particles Single layer Graphene Pauli matrices on ∆ A and B sublattices Elec tr ic field MASSLESS CHIRAL -∆ A B Sublattice Sublattice Bilayer Graphene Low energy effective Hamiltonian by integrating out high energy dimer part Pauli matrices on upper and lower layers Transverse electric field can generate energy gaps in spectrum !! Upper Lower MASSIVE CHIRAL Layer Layer StrainedBilayer graphene bilayer graphene StrainedBilayer graphene bilayer graphene - Energy gap under perpendicular electric field - Energy gap under perpendicular electric field Min, McDonald et al, PRB 75, 155115 (2007) McCann, PRB 74, 161403 (R) (2006) Oostinga et al, Nature Mat. 7, 151 (2007) Zhang et al, Nature 459, 820 (2009) T. Ohta et al, Science 313, 951 (2006) Min, McDonald et al, PRB 75, 155115 (2007) McCann, PRB 74, 161403 (R) (2006) 51 52 Bilayer graphene Bilayer graphene : Next nearest neighbor inter-layer hopping : Next nearest neighbor inter-layer hopping 1.1 meV The next nearest neighbor hopping breaks a global U(1) symmetry into Z3 (magnitude of kDi is about 0.4% of distance from Γ to K point) Bilayer graphene in AB-stacking 53 54 - First principles calculation with vdW corrections Lecture 2 1.1 meV Electrons in Graphitic Systems with Magnetic Fields κxx=×−ΓΓ100 (k K) / K κ yy=×Γ100k / K Contour line interval =0.5 meV SEMI-CLASSICAL APPROACH SEMI-CLASSICAL APPROACH 2 Dimensional Electron Gas in B-field 2 Dimensional Electron Gas in B-field Drude Model : RH I I B-field B-field Y RL X Rxx = RL Rxy = RH Longitudinal Hall Resistance Resistance B-field (Classical) Hall Effect (1879) Drude Model : QUANMTUM MECHANICS LANDAU QUANTIZATION 2 Dimensional Electron Gas in B-field 2 Dimensional Electron Gas in B-field RH I I B-field B-field
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Graphene Growth and Device Integration
    INVITED PAPER Graphene Growth and Device Integration This paper describes one of the emerging methods for growing grapheneVthe chemical vapor deposition methodVwhich is based on a catalytic reaction between a carbon precursor and a metal substrate such as Ni, Cu, and Ru, to name a few. By Luigi Colombo, Fellow IEEE, Robert M. Wallace, Fellow IEEE,andRodneyS.Ruoff ABSTRACT | Graphene has been introduced to the electronics devices in order to exceed the performance characteristics community as a potentially useful material for scaling elec- of current device applications as well as developing new tronic devices to meet low-power and high-performance devices, especially for flexible electronics, transparent targets set by the semiconductor industry international road- electrodes for displays and touch screens, photonic map, radio-frequency (RF) devices, and many more applica- applications, energy generation, and batteries [3], [12], tions. Growth and integration of graphene for any device is [13]. The first graphene films were only a few tens of challenging and will require significant effort and innovation to micrometers on the side and so the principal first issue in address the many issues associated with integrating the making graphene devices a reality is the development of a monolayer, chemically inert surface with metals and dielec- graphene of sufficient quality and size to meet the basic trics. In this paper, we review the growth and integration of physical and electronic properties. Since the isolation of graphene for simple field-effect transistors and present graphene from natural graphite, a number of techniques physical and electrical data on the integrated graphene with and processes have been studied and are in development to metals and dielectrics.
    [Show full text]
  • Graphene an Introduction to the Material, Its Application As a Photodetector and Possible Future Uses
    Graphene An Introduction to the Material, its Application as a Photodetector and possible future Uses Daniel Schmid, W14b Kantonsschule Enge, Zürich 18.12.2017 Supervised by Erich Schurtenberger 2 Abstract In this paper, the two-dimensional material graphene is investigated. The characteristics of graphene are stated and how this material can lead to technological progress. Its structure and fundamental properties are exhibited and with the basic functioning principles of photodetectors, the practical use of graphene is shown by means of a specific application. The last chapter provides an outlook on the variety of other possible future applications. 3 Abstract 4 Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................ 5 Preamble ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 8 History of Graphene .................................................................................................................... 9 What is Graphene ..................................................................................................................... 11 Structure ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Decade of Graphene Research: Production, Applications and Outlook
    Materials Today Volume 00, Number 00 June 2014 RESEARCH Review A decade of graphene research: production, applications and outlook RESEARCH: Edward P. Randviir, Dale A.C. Brownson and Craig E. Banks* Faculty of Science and Engineering, School of Chemistry and the Environment, Division of Chemistry and Environmental Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, Chester Street, Manchester M1 5GD, Lancs, UK Graphene research has accelerated exponentially since 2004 when graphene was isolated and characterized for the first time utilizing the ‘Scotch Tape’ method by Geim and Novoselov and given the reports of unique electronic properties that followed. The number of academic publications reporting the use of graphene was so substantial in 2013 that it equates to over 40 publications per day. With such an enormous interest in graphene it is imperative for both experts and the layman to keep up with both current graphene technology and the history of graphene technology. Consequently, this review addresses the latter point, with a primary focus upon disseminating graphene research with a more applicatory approach and the addition of our own personal graphene perspectives; the future outlook of graphene is also considered. Introduction risk with tax-payer’s money once again in the hope of develop- The world of materials research is currently engulfed by research ing futuristic technologies with graphene? Two decades ago focusing on the mass production, characterization and real- carbon nanotubes, a sister material of graphene, were reported world applications of ultra-thin carbon films [1–10]; the thin- to have many real-world applications and yet to this day there nest of which is graphene.
    [Show full text]
  • From Conception to Realization: an Historial Account of Graphene and Some Perspectives for Its Future Daniel R
    Minireviews R. S. Ruoff, C. W. Bielawski, and D. R. Dreyer DOI: 10.1002/anie.201003024 Genealogy of Graphene From Conception to Realization: An Historial Account of Graphene and Some Perspectives for Its Future Daniel R. Dreyer, Rodney S. Ruoff,* and Christopher W. Bielawski* carbon · graphene · graphite · history of chemistry There has been an intense surge in interest in graphene during recent years. However, graphene-like materials derived from graphite oxide were reported in 1962, and related chemical modifications of graphite were described as early as 1840. In this detailed account of the fasci- nating development of the synthesis and characterization of graphene, we hope to demonstrate that the rich history of graphene chemistry laid the foundation for the exciting research that continues to this day. Important challenges remain, however; many with great technological relevance. 1. Graphene Defined as high specific surface areas. Indeed, the theoretically predicted (> 2500 m2 gÀ1)[13] and experimentally measured Graphite—a term derived from the Greek word “graphe- surface areas (400–700 m2 gÀ1)[14–16] of such materials have also in” (to write)[1]—has a long and interesting history in many made them attractive for many commercial applications, areas of chemistry, physics, and engineering.[2–4] Its lamellar including gas[17–26] and energy[16] storage, as well as micro- and structure bestows unique electronic and mechanical proper- optoelectronics.[27–31] ties, particularly when the individual layers of graphite (held Layers of carbon atoms that have been isolated from together by van der Waals forces) are considered as inde- graphite are commonly referred to as “graphene”.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1309.6019V1 [Cond-Mat.Str-El] 24 Sep 2013
    Tunable single-particle and many-body physics in graphene by Matthew P. Killi A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Physics University of Toronto arXiv:1309.6019v1 [cond-mat.str-el] 24 Sep 2013 Copyright c 2013 by Matthew P. Killi Abstract Tunable single-particle and many-body physics in graphene Matthew P. Killi Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Physics University of Toronto 2013 The primary subject of this thesis is graphene and how the rudimentary attributes of its charge carriers, and local moments on its surface, can be directly manipulated and controlled with electrostatic potentials. We first consider bilayer graphene subject to a spatially varying electrostatic potential that forms two neighbouring regions with opposite interlayer bias. Along the boundary, 1D chiral `kink' states emerge. We find that these 1D modes behave as a strongly interacting Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid whose properties can be tuned via an external gate. Next, we consider superlattices in bilayer graphene. Superlattices are seen to have a more dramatic effect on bilayer graphene than monolayer graphene because the quasi- particles are changed in a fundamental way; the dispersion goes from a quadratic band touching point to linearly dispersing Dirac cones. We illustrate that a 1D superlattice of either the chemical potential or an interlayer bias generates multiple anisotropic Dirac cones. General arguments delineate how certain symmetries protect the Dirac points. We then map the Hamiltonian of an interlayer bias superlattice onto a coupled chain model comprised of `topological' edge modes. We then discuss the relevance of spatially varying potentials to recent transport measurements.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Epitaxial Graphene for 21St Century Electronics
    The Development of Epitaxial Graphene For 21st Century Electronics. MRS Medal Award paper presented at the MSR meeting in Boston, Dec.2 ,2010 Walt A. de Heer Georgia Institute of Technology Abstract Graphene has been known for a long time but only recently has its potential for electronics been recognized. Its history is recalled starting from early graphene studies. A critical insight in June, 2001 brought to light that graphene could be used for electronics. This was followed by a series of proposals and measurements. The Georgia Institute of Technology (GIT) graphene electronics research project was first funded, by Intel in 2003, and later by the NSF in 2004 and the Keck foundation in 2008. The GIT group selected epitaxial graphene as the most viable route for graphene based electronics and their seminal paper on transport and structural measurements of epitaxial graphene was published in 2004. Subsequently, the field rapidly developed and multilayer graphene was discovered at GIT. This material consists of many graphene layers but it is not graphite: each layer has the electronic structure of graphene. Currently the field has developed to the point where epitaxial graphene based electronics may be realized in the not too distant future. Introduction: a brief history of graphene Graphene has a long history. Already in the 1800’s it was known that graphite was a layered material that could be exfoliated by various methods. The famous chemist Acheson1 had developed exfoliation methods (that he called deflocculation) to produce colloidal suspensions of small graphitic flakes that he called “dags”. These colloidal graphite suspensions have been extensively used in the electronics industry as a conducting paint to produce conducting surfaces in vacuum tubes.
    [Show full text]
  • Correlated Electromigration of H In
    Interplay between engineering and fundamental research in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Prof. dr. ir. Bart van Wees Physics of Nanodevices group Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials University of Groningen The Netherlands How to recognize scientific disciplines (I)? If it squirms, it's biology. If it stinks, it's chemistry. If you can't understand it, it's mathematics. and… If it doesn't work, it's physics. (attr. to Magnus Pyke) has been removed How to recognize scientific disciplines (II)? If it works, but you don’t understand how, it’s technology ! (unknown author) Isambard Kingdom Brunel (1806-1859) (Nr 2 on list of 100 Greatest Britons) S.S. Great Eastern Royal Albert Bridge Brunel’s “Atmospheric Railway” Quantum point contact ( BJvW1988) Split-gate technique Quantized conductance of one- dimensional electron channels Quantum dots and quantum point contacts 2010 Nobel Prize for Physics Prize motivation: "for groundbreaking experiments regarding the two-dimensional material graphene" Andrei Geim Konstantin Novoselov History of graphene Early development of graphene electronics Walt A. de Heer Georgia Institute of Technology Abstract Graphene has recently emerged as a material likely to complement or eventually succeed silicon in electronics. From 2001 to 2004, groundbreaking research was pursued behind the scenes at Georgia Tech; various directions were explored, including exfoliation techniques and CVD growth, but epitaxial graphene on silicon carbide emerged as the most viable route. This document provides archival information that may otherwise be difficult to obtain, including two proposals on file with the NSF, submitted in 2001 and 2003, and the first graphene patent, filed in 2003. The 2001 document proposes much of the graphene research carried out during this decade, and the 2003 proposal includes the data that was eventually published in J.
    [Show full text]
  • THE RISE of GRAPHENE A.K. Geim and K.S. Novoselov Manchester
    THE RISE OF GRAPHENE A.K. Geim and K.S. Novoselov Manchester Centre for Mesoscience and Nanotechnology, University of Manchester, Oxford Road M13 9PL, United Kingdom Graphene is a rapidly rising star on the horizon of materials science and condensed matter physics. This strictly two-dimensional material exhibits exceptionally high crystal and electronic quality and, despite its short history, has already revealed a cornucopia of new physics and potential applications, which are briefly discussed here. Whereas one can be certain of the realness of applications only when commercial products appear, graphene no longer requires any further proof of its importance in terms of fundamental physics. Owing to its unusual electronic spectrum, graphene has led to the emergence of a new paradigm of “relativistic” condensed matter physics, where quantum relativistic phenomena, some of which are unobservable in high energy physics, can now be mimicked and tested in table-top experiments. More generally, graphene represents a conceptually new class of materials that are only one atom thick and, on this basis, offers new inroads into low-dimensional physics that has never ceased to surprise and continues to provide a fertile ground for applications. Graphene is the name given to a flat monolayer of carbon atoms tightly packed into a two-dimensional (2D) honeycomb lattice, and is a basic building block for graphitic materials of all other dimensionalities (Figure 1). It can be wrapped up into 0D fullerenes, rolled into 1D nanotubes or stacked into 3D graphite. Theoretically, graphene (or “2D graphite”) has been studied for sixty years1-3 and widely used for describing properties of various carbon-based materials.
    [Show full text]
  • ANDRE K. GEIM School of Physics and Astronomy, the University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
    RANDOM WALK TO GRAPHENE Nobel Lecture, December 8, 2010 by ANDRE K. GEIM School of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom. If one wants to understand the beautiful physics of graphene, they will be spoiled for choice with so many reviews and popular science articles now available. I hope that the reader will excuse me if on this occasion I recommend my own writings [1–3]. Instead of repeating myself here, I have chosen to describe my twisty scientific road that eventually led to the Nobel Prize. Most parts of this story are not described anywhere else, and its time- line covers the period from my PhD in 1987 to the moment when our 2004 paper, recognised by the Nobel Committee, was accepted for publication. The story naturally gets denser in events and explanations towards the end. Also, it provides a detailed review of pre-2004 literature and, with the benefit of hindsight, attempts to analyse why graphene has attracted so much inter- est. I have tried my best to make this article not only informative but also easy to read, even for non-physicists. ZOMBIE MANAGEMENT My PhD thesis was called “Investigation of mechanisms of transport relaxa- tion in metals by a helicon resonance method”. All I can say is that the stuff was as interesting at that time as it sounds to the reader today. I published five journal papers and finished the thesis in five years, the official duration for a PhD at my institution, the Institute of Solid State Physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Graphene: a Review
    International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056 Volume: 03 Issue: 02 | Feb-2016 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 Graphene: A Review Shubham D. Somani1, Shrikrishna B. Pawar2 1 B.E., Department of Mechanical Engineering, MGM’s JNEC Aurangabad (M.S.), India 2 Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, MGM’s JNEC Aurangabad (M.S.), India ---------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract – Graphene is first truly two-dimensional through it. In order to use Graphene for future nano crystalline material and it is representative of whole electronic devices it should have a band gap engineered within it, which will decrease its electron mobility to that new class of 2D materials. Graphene is a name given to of same levels which are seen in silicone films. Graphene a deceptively simple and tightly packed layer of carbon has swiftly changed its status from being an unwelcomed atoms in hexagonal structure. Being only one atom newbie to a climbing star and to a reigning champion. thick, it is the thinnest compound known to man and the lightest material discovered. The strongest bond in nature, the C-C bond covalently locks the atoms in place giving them remarkable mechanical properties. This paper aims at reviewing the standing of this miracle material. Graphene has leapt to the forefront of material science and has numerous possible applications. One of the most promising aspect of Graphene is its potential as a replacement to silicon in computer circuitry. The discovery of Graphene has completely revolutionized the way we look at potential limits of our capability as Inventors.
    [Show full text]
  • Honeycomb Carbon: a Review of Graphene
    132 Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 132–145 Honeycomb Carbon: A Review of Graphene Matthew J. Allen,† Vincent C. Tung,‡ and Richard B. Kaner*,†,‡ Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry and California NanoSystems Institute, and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095 Received February 20, 2009 Contents because two-dimensional crystals were thought to be ther- modynamically unstable at finite temperatures.3,4 Quasi-two- 1. Introduction 132 dimensional films grown by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) 2. Brief History of Graphene 133 are stabilized by a supporting substrate, which often plays a 2.1. Chemistry of Graphite 134 significant role in growth and has an appreciable influence 3. Down to Single Layers 134 on electrical properties.5 In contrast, the mechanical exfo- 3.1. Characterizing Graphene Flakes 136 liation technique used by the Manchester group isolated the 3.1.1. Scanning Probe Microscopy 136 two-dimensional crystals from three-dimensional graphite. 3.1.2. Raman Spectroscopy 136 Resulting single- and few-layer flakes were pinned to the 4. Extraordinary Devices with Peeled Graphene 136 substrate by only van der Waals forces and could be made free-standing by etching away the substrate.6-9 This mini- 4.1. High-Speed Electronics 137 mized any induced effects and allowed scientists to probe 4.2. Single Molecule Detection 138 graphene’s intrinsic properties. 5. Alternatives to Mechanical Exfoliation 138 The experimental isolation of single-layer graphene first 5.1. Chemically Derived Graphene from Graphite 139 and foremost yielded access to a large amount of interesting Oxide physics.10,11 Initial studies included observations of graphene’s 5.1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Lecture: Random Walk to Graphene*
    REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, VOLUME 83, JULY–SEPTEMBER 2011 Nobel Lecture: Random walk to graphene* Andre K. Geim (Received 5 October 2010; published 3 August 2011) DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.83.851 If one wants to understand the beautiful physics of gra- subject (Geim, 1989), which was closely followed by an phene, they will be spoilt for choice with so many reviews and independent paper from Simon Bending et al. (1990).It popular science articles now available. I hope that the reader was an interesting and reasonably important niche, and will excuse me if on this occasion I recommend my own I continued studying the subject for the next few years, writings (Geim and Novoselov, 2007; Geim and Kim, 2008; including a spell at the University of Bath in 1991 as a Geim, 2009). Instead of repeating myself here, I have chosen postdoctoral researcher working with Simon. to describe my twisty scientific road that eventually led to the This experience taught me an important lesson that intro- Nobel Prize. Most parts of this story are not described any- ducing a new experimental system is generally more reward- where else, and its time line covers the period from my Ph.D. ing than trying to find new phenomena within crowded areas. in 1987 to the moment when our 2004 paper, recognized by Chances of success are much higher where the field is new. Of the Nobel Committee, was accepted for publication. The course, fantastic results one originally hopes for are unlikely story naturally gets denser in events and explanations towards to materialize, but, in the process of studying any new system, the end.
    [Show full text]