24-26 Budapest, Hungary GAM
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
24-26 Budapest, Hungary GAM European Scientific Institute 5th Global Academic Meeting, GAM 2016, 24-26 March, Budapest, Hungary, Proceedings PROCEEDINGS 5th GLOBAL ACADEMIC MEETING, GAM 2016, 24-26 March, Budapest, Hungary 5th Global Academic Meeting, GAM 2016, 24-26 March, Budapest, Hungary, Proceedings PROCEEDINGS 5th GLOBAL ACADEMIC MEETING, GAM 2016, 24-26 March, Budapest, Hungary European Scientific Institute, ESI (publishing) 5th Global Academic Meeting, GAM 2016, 24-26 March, Budapest, Hungary, Proceedings Impressum Bibliographic information published by the National and University Library "St. Kliment Ohridski" in Skopje, Macedonia; detailed bibliographic data are available in the internet at http://www.nubsk.edu.mk/; CIP - 3(082) COBISS. MK-ID 101109514 Any brand names and product names mentioned in this book are subject to trademark, brand or patent protection and trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective holders. The use of brand names, product names, common names, trade names, product descriptions etc. even without a particular marking in this works is in no way to be construed to mean that such names may be regarded as unrestricted in respect of trademark and brand protection legislation and could thus be used by anyone. PROCEEDINGS: 5th Global Academic Meeting, GAM 2016, (5 2016; Budapest) / 5th Global Academic Meeting, GAM 2016, 24-26 March, Budapest, Hungary European Scientific Institute, ESI, 2016. (239 p.) : ilust. ; 21 cm Kocani, Republic of Macedonia Email: [email protected] Printed in Republic of Macedonia ISBN 978-608-4642-48-0 Copyright © 2016 by the authors, ESI and licensors All rights reserved. 2016 5th Global Academic Meeting, GAM 2016, 24-26 March, Budapest, Hungary, Proceedings PROCEEDINGS 5th GLOBAL ACADEMIC MEETING, GAM 2016, 24-26 March, Budapest, Hungary doi: 10.19044/esj.2016p2 URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016p2 5th Global Academic Meeting, GAM 2016, 24-26 March, Budapest, Hungary, Proceedings Table Of Contents: Why Architects See Things Differently An Architectural Approach On Teaching Space Perception...........................................................................1 Dana Julean On Teaching History Of Architecture In Higher Education Or How To Use Sir Banister Fletcher’s A History Of Architecture For A 21st Century Course In Architectural History – An Overview.........................9 Dan-Ionuţ Julean The Nexus Between Teacher Professional Identity And Some Socio- Demographic And Psychological Variables..............................................19 Predrag Zivkovic Contributions To The Study Of The Relevance Of The Web 2.0 On Online Newspapers In Portugal – Case Study..........................................32 Júlio Costa Pinto Religion In The Workplace: The Legal Framework In Portugal...........41 Susana Sousa Machado Natural Disaster Governance: Barriers For Turkey................................47 Tolgahan Aydıner Hüseyin Özgür Romania And The British Model Of Government (1866-1914) : A New Approach To The Study Of The Romanian Politics.................................61 Dogaru Cosmin-Stefan Modeling and Managing of Random and Sudden Demand of Inventory.......................................................................................................69 Afrah , M. , Al-Tarawneh Salloom , A. , Al-Juboori Compromises in Healthcare Privacy due to Data Breaches....................91 S. Srinivasan 5th Global Academic Meeting, GAM 2016, 24-26 March, Budapest, Hungary, Proceedings Health Care Workers And Patients Safety In Nursing Homes...............99 J. Sepp K. Reinhold M. Järvis P.Tint Adsorption Of Heavy Metals Onto Waste Tea.......................................111 Sukru Aslan Sayiter Yildiz Mustafa Ozturk Ayben Polat Sorption Of Heavy Metals On Biosludge.................................................118 Sukru Aslan Mustafa Ozturk Sayiter Yildiz Investigation Of Aerobic Degradation Of Industrial Wastewater Containing High Organic Matter: Kinetic Study...................................124 M. Sarioglu Cebeci I. Senturk U. Guvenin Involvement of Students in Experimental In-store Research Projects.......................................................................................................133 Beata Pethő SmallWorld: A Test and Training System for the Cyber-Security.......139 Angelo Furfaro Antonio Piccolo Domenico Saccà Implementation Of Total Quality Management To Improve The Poultry Feed Manufacturing Processes.................................................................146 Salloom A. Al-Juboori Some Comments On Fractionally Integration Processes Involving Two Agricultural Commodities........................................................................171 Lucas Renato Trevisan Sergio Adriani David 5th Global Academic Meeting, GAM 2016, 24-26 March, Budapest, Hungary, Proceedings The Resources Of Good Supervision.......................................................180 Kaarina Määttä Satu Uusiautti Independecy Of Qualitative Audit Regarding The Audit Firm Size....192 Majlinda Maqellari Drini Salko Materiality And Risk Essential Pillars Of The Auditor’s Work..........198 Majlinda Maqellari Ines Dika The Social Status Of Judo Athletes..........................................................204 Dragan Popovic Evagelia Boli Milos Popovic Vladimir Savic Jasna Popovic The Determinants Of Industrialization: Empirical Evidence For Africa...........................................................................................................219 Beji Samouel Belhadj Aram 5th Global Academic Meeting, GAM 2016, 24-26 March, Budapest, Hungary, Proceedings Why Architects See Things Differently An Architectural Approach On Teaching Space Perception Dana Julean Senior lecturer PhD architect Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania Abstract Space is all around us, we experience it as shaped into buildings, rooms, tiny enclosures, as well as shaped into public spaces, squares, streets, and as natural landscapes. However, when we look at it, interact with it, walk through it, we all experience it differently. Psychology teaches us that the perceptual process is a very complex mechanism, which is essentially made up of two aspects: “one of which is essentially figurative, related to the percepts or images of successive states or momentary configurations of the world by direct and immediate contact, and a second which is essentially operative, related to the operations which intervene between successive states and by which the subject transforms parts of the world into reconstructable patterns or schemas.” (Hart & Moore, 1973, p. 249). Thus, when looking at space, although we all “see” the same thing, we operate and understand things differently mainly because of our different social, cultural, religious, and geographical backgrounds (Downs & Stea, 1973). Therefore, the present study would like to focus precisely on this aspect, namely why do architects perceive space differently than the ordinary passerby? Keywords: Architecture, space perception, architectural higher education The Perfect Building Architects and builders have been obsessing for centuries over the perfect proportions of their buildings. Going back as far as the ancient Greeks, the composition of the facades, the language of styles, and the rules of architectural orders, defined through the architects’ approaches, have always looked for and argued over the “correct” way of conceiving architecture. For example, the golden ratio is probably the best-known example of the mathematical search for right proportions in architecture. Nowadays, there are specialized publications, on-line platforms, courses, conferences, discussions and prizes which all debate, on a highly 1 5th Global Academic Meeting, GAM 2016, 24-26 March, Budapest, Hungary, Proceedings professional level, the aesthetics of the most recently built architecture. However, all of this is done within the profession - namely architects judge other architects’ buildings, accomplishments, spatial experiments and so on. Whenever the architects take part in discussions, which involve people outside their circle, there always appears this one question: why do not ordinary people appreciate “Architecture” with capital A? Moreover, why do architectural professionals seem to have such radically different opinions on what makes “good architecture”? (Vais, 2015, p. 97) Architectural Space Perception: A Distorted Point of View This is a very common subject among architectural psychology studies. For example, David Halpern (as cited in Vais, 2015, p. 98) recounts that he himself contemplated the idea of becoming an architect, until, as a senior student in Cambridge, he took part in an experiment which investigated this aspect. The experiment used groups of students majoring in different fields (arts, architecture, and natural sciences). They were asked to view a set of pictures, which illustrated faces of people or buildings. The aim of the experimenters was to establish how different educational backgrounds alter the way “beauty” is being perceived. Results showed that all the participants, regardless of their background, had a very similar view on which features make an attractive face. However, in the case of buildings, as expected, there was a very clear distinction between the answers given by the architecture students and the rest; furthermore, the distinction grew, within the group of older architecture students, thus proving the fact that architectural education distorts the perception of beauty of the build environment.