Indian Country Issues
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Indian Country Issues In Tbis Issue . Jurisdictional Conflicts Between Tribes and States: Disputes Over Land Set Aside Pursuant to the Indian Reorganization Act and July Reservation Boundary Disputes .............................. 1 2014 By Gina Allery and Darou T. Carreiro Volume62 Number4 Protecting the Civil Rights of American Indians and Alaska Natives: The Civil Rights Division's Indian Working Group ............. 10 Uniled,States By Verlin Deerinwater and Susana Lorenzo-Giguere Department of1\lstice l!!:xeeutive Office fur United States Altom.y. Wubington, DC Reentry Programming in Indian Country: Building the Third Leg 20530 of the Stool ............................................... 16 Monty Wilkinson By Timothy Q. Purdon Director Contributors' opinions and statements Native Children Exposed to Violence: Defending Childhood in should not be considered an Indian Country and Alaska Native Communities ............... 22 endorsoment by EOUSA fur any poJicy1 program, or service By Amanda Marshall Tbe United Statos Altomeys' Bulletin is published plll'$uant to Investigating and Prosecuting the Non-Fatal Strangulation Case .. 28 28 CFR § 0 22(b) By Leslie A. Hagen Tbe United StaleS Altornoys' Bulletin ;. publilbed bJmonthly by the Executive Office fur United States Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act Attorney., Offico ofLegall!dueation, 1620Pendleto.IIStreet, (NAGPRA): The Law Is Not an Authorization for Disinterment . .41 Columbia, Seulh Carolina 29201 By Sherry Hutt and David Tarler Manaatn~ Editor The Investigation and Federal Prosecution of the Native Mob Tun Donovan Responding to a Statewide Gang Threat Through the Use of the Associate Editor C1111110l Matin Racketeering Statute ...................................... 52 By Andrew R. Winter LawOerk Jennifer Jokerst lntemetAddress www osdoj gov/usao/ readin&_roomlfoiamanuals html Sebd article submissions and addross ehanges to Managina Editor, United StaleS Attorneys' Bulletin, National Advocacy Center, Office ofLegall!ducation, 1620 Pendleton S-, Columbia, SC 2920 l Recommendations:MEDICAL/RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF ACUTE ADOLESCENT/ ADULT, NON-FATAL STRANGULATION Prepared by Dr. Bill Smock, Police Surgeon, Louisville Metro Police Department and Sally Sturgeon, DNP, SANE-A with the support of the Medical Advisory Committee for the Training Institute on Strangulation Prevention 1. Evaluate carotid and vertebral arteries for injuries GOALS: 2. Evaluate bony/cartilaginous and soft tissue neck structures 3. Evaluate brain for anoxic injury Strangulation patient presents to the Emergency Department History of and/or physical exam History of and/or physical exam with ANY of the following: with: • • LOC (anoxic brain injury) • No LOC (anoxic brain injury) • Visual changes: “spots”, “flashing light”, “tunnel vision” • No visual changes: “spots”, “flashing light”, • Facial intraoral or conjunctival petechial hemorrhage “tunnel vision” • Ligature mark or contusions on neck • No petechial hemorrhage • Soft tissue neck injury/swelling of the neck • No soft tissue trauma to the neck • Incontinence (bladder and/or bowel from • No dyspnea, dysphonia or odynophagia anoxic injury) • No neurological signs or symptoms (i.e. • Neurological signs or symptoms (i.e. LOC, seizures, LOC, seizures, mental status changes, mental status changes, amnesia, visual changes, cortical amnesia, visual changes, cortical blindness, blindness, movement disorder, stroke-like symtoms.) movement disorder, stroke-like symtoms) • Dysphonia/Aphonia (hematoma, laryngeal fracture, • And reliable home monitoring soft tissue swelling) • Dyspnea (soft tissue swelling, hematoma, phrenic nerve injury) • Subcutaneous emphysema (tracheal/ Discharge home with laryngeal rupture) detailed instructions to return to ED if: neurological signs/ symptoms, dyspnea, dysphonia or odynophagia Radiographic Study Required to R/O develops or worsens Life-Threatening Injuries* Continued ED/Hospital Observation • CT Angio of carotid/vertebral arteries (gold standard (-) (based on severity of for evaluation of vessels and bony/cartilaginous symptoms and reliable structures, less sensitive for soft tissue trauma) home monitoring) • CT neck with contrast (less sensitive than CT Angio for vessels, good for bony/cartilaginous structures) • Consult • MRA of neck (less sensitive than CT Angio for vessels, Neurology best for soft tissue trauma) Neurosurgery/ • MRI of neck (less sensitive than CT Angio for vessels (+) Trauma Surgery and bony/cartilaginous structures, best study for soft for admission tissue trauma) • Consider ENT *References on page 2 • MRI/MRA of brain (most sensitive for anoxic brain consult for injury, stroke symptoms and intercerebral laryngeal trauma Version 1.3, 2/16 petechial hemorrhage) with dysphonia, WSS 101 West Broadway, Suite 1770, San Diego California 92101 Toll Free: 888-511-3522 - Local: 619-236-9551 - Fax: 619-236-0677 www.strangulationtraininginstitute.org REFERENCES 1. Christe A, Thoeny H, Ross S, et al. Life-threatening versus non-life-threatening manual strangulation: are there appropriate criteria for MR imaging of the neck?. Eur Radiol 2009;19: 1882-1889 2. Christe A, Oesterhelweg L, Ross S, et al. Can MRI of the Neck Compete with Clinical Findings in Assessing Danger to Life for Survivors of Manual Strangulation? A Statistical Analysis, Legal Med 2010;12:228-232 3. Yen K, Thali MJ, Aghayev E, et al. Strangulation Signs: Initial Correlation of MRI, MSCT, and Forensic Neck Findings, J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:501-510 4. Stapczynski JS, Strangulation Injuries, Emergency Medicine Reports 2010;31(17):193-203 5. Yen K, Vock P, Christe A, et al. Clinical Forensic Radiology in Strangulation Victims: Forensic expertise based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, Int J Legal Med 2007;121:115-123 6. Malek AM, Higashida RT, Halback VV, et al. Patient Presentation Angiographic Features and Treatment of Strangulation-Induced Bilateral Dissection of the Cervical Carotid Artery: Report of three cases, J Neurosurg 2000;92(3):481-487 7. Di Paolo M, Guidi B, Bruschini L, et al. Unexpected delayed death after manual strangulation: need for care examination in the emergency room, Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 2009;Sep;71(3):132-4 8. Dayapala A, Samarasekera A and Jayasena A, An Uncommon Delayed Sequela After Pressure on the Neck: An autopsy case report, Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2012;33:80-82 9. Hori A, Hirose G, Kataoka, et al. Delayed Postanoxic Encephalopathy After Strangulation, Arch Neurol 1991;48:871-874 10. Iacovou E, Nayar M, Fleming J, Lew-Gor S, A pain in the neck: a rare case of isolated hyoid bone trauma, JSCR 2011;7(3) 11. Oh JH, Min HS, Park TU, Sang JL, Kim SE, Isolated Cricoid Fracture Associated with Blunt Neck Trauma; Emerg Med J 2007;24:505-506 12. Gill JR, Cavalli DP, Ely SF, Stahl-Herz J, Homicidal Neck Compression of Females: Autopsy and Sexual Assault Findings, Acad Forensic Path 2013;3(4):454-457 13. Sethi PK, Sethi NK, Torgovnick J, Arsura E, Delayed Left Anterior and Middle Cerebral Artery Hemorrhagic Infarctions After Attempted Strangulation, A case report; Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2012;33:105-106 14. Clarot F, Vaz E, Papin F, Proust B, Fatal and Non-fatal Bilateral Delayed Carotid Artery Dissection after Manual Strangulation, Forensic Sci Int 2005;149:143-150 15. Molack J, Baxa J, Ferda J, Treska V, Bilateral Post-Traumatic Carotid Dissection as a Result of a Strangulation Injury, Ann Vasc Surg 2010;24:1133e9-1133e11 16. Plattner T, Bollinger S, Zollinger U, Forensic Assessment of Survived Strangulation, Forensic Sci Int 2005;153:202-207 17. Miao J, Su C, Wang W, et al. Delayed Parkinsonism with Selective Symmetric Basal Ganglia Lesion after Manual Strangulation, J Clin Neurosci 2009;16:573-575 18. Purvin V, Unilateral Headache and Ptosis in a 30-Year-Old Woman, Surv Ophthalmol 1997;42(2):163-168 101 West Broadway, Suite 1770, San Diego California 92101 Toll Free: 888-511-3522 - Local: 619-236-9551 - Fax: 619-236-0677 www.strangulationtraininginstitute.org Non-Fatal Strangulation Documentation Toolkit International Association of Forensic Nurses www.ForensicNurses.org November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface i Strangulation Task Force Members 1 Purpose 3 Section I – Non-Fatal Strangulation Strangulation Assessment, Documentation, and Evidence Collection Guidelines 4 Section II – Non-Fatal Strangulation Policy and Procedure Example Policy and Procedure 7 Section III – Clinical Evaluation and Documentation Non-Fatal Strangulation Clinical Evaluation 9 Non-Fatal Strangulation Descriptors for Examiners 11 Non-Fatal Strangulation Documentation Form 14 Section IV – Discharge Instructions Example Strangulation Discharge Instructions 21 Additional Resources 22 References References 23 Bibliography Comprehensive Bibliography 25 PREFACE In 1992, The International Association of Forensic Nurses (IAFN) was created by a group of nurses that recognized violence as a healthcare problem. Over the past two and a half decades much progress has been made as it relates to the care of our specialized patient population. Through this progress, knowledge has been gained and practice guidelines continue to evolve with the goal of continuous provision of safe and effective patient care. In early 2015, the IAFN, the Board of Directors and a group of members recognized strangulation as a healthcare concern that needed practice guidance throughout the organization, and as a result, the Strangulation Task Force was created and was proven to be a group of hard working, dedicated individuals that are