Introduc0on to the Economics of Health and Medical Care
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Introduc)on to the Economics of Health and Medical Care Session 1A—January 5, 2015 Health Economics PHARM 568 Winter 2015 Co-Coursemasters: Lou Garrison, PhD Norma Coe, PhD 1 Agenda • Course Objec)ves, Overview, and Resources • Economic Way of Thinking • Is Health Care Different? • Microeconomics Reminder • Stylized Facts and StasPcal Overview 2 Course Objecves • Master key economic concepts and analyPcal tools needed to analyze human economic behavior in general. • Understand and apply microeconomic principles to analyze the major issues of the health care sector. • Understand the key insPtuPonal and market factors that affect the incenPves of the stakeholders in the key health care markets. • Understand both the perspecPve and limits of economic analysis applied to health care. • Gain some historical economic perspecPve on the evoluPon of major health policy issues 3 Assignments and Grading Biweekly Homework Assignments A. All students are expected to complete the four weekly homework assignments. Each will require a 500-1000 word short essay of topic of interest. B. All parPcipants will complete a take-home exam midway in the course. C. Final exam will be scheduled for in-class during the scheduled Pme block GRADING: Classroom ParPcipaon 5% Homework assignments 20% Midterm 30% Final Exam 45% Grading will be based on student performance using the grading system for graduate students published in the 2002 - 2004 University of Washington General Catalog for Graduate and Professional Students, pp. 13. 4 Lectures 5 Key Economic Terms and Concepts • Adverse selecon • Experience rang • Opportunity cost • CerPficaon • Externality • Parallel import • Coinsurance • Hyperbolic discounPng • Pareto opPmality • Community rang • Human capital • PosiPve economics • Consumer surplus • Indemnity • Post-experience good • Consumpon • Inferior good • Price discriminaon • Cost efficiency • Informaon asymmetry • Price elasPcity of demand • Cost-benefit analysis • (Internal) rate of return • Private goods • Cost-effecPveness analysis • Internaonal reference pricing • Public goods • Cost-uPlity analysis • Investment good • Reference pricing • Decision fague • Licensure • Residual claimant • Deadweight loss • Loss aversion • Shirking • Deducble • Luxury good • Status quo bias • Defaults • Market concentraon • Sunk cost • Demand • Market failure • Supplier-induced demand • DifferenPal pricing • MonopolisPc compePPon • Tax subsidy • Discount rate • Monopoly • Technical efficiency • Dissipaon of rents • Monosony • TherapeuPc reference pricing • Economic efficiency • Moral hazard • Uncertainty • Economic rents • RBRVS • Welfare economics • Economies of scale • Necessity good • Welfare loss • Economies of scope • Normal good • Equilibrium • Normave economics • Experience good • Nudge 6 Readings Handbooks of Health Economics (Vols IA and IB). Culyer A and Newhouse JP. (eds.) 2000. Handbooks of Health Economics, Vol. 2, Pauly MV, McGuire TG, and Barros PP (eds.), Elsevier/NH, 2011. Here is the UW link to the Handbook of Health Economics: hfp://uwashington.worldcat.org.offcampus.lib.washington.edu/wcpa/oclc/690107506?page=frame&url=hfp %3A%2F%2Fwww.sciencedirect.com%2Fscience%2Fhandbooks%2F15740064%26checksum %3Dd9a3c797d966ba524cd5a34433ea16fd&Ptle=&linktype=digitalObject&detail=:noframes Elgar Companion for Health Economics, Second EdiPon (Andrew Jones.), 2012. Available as e-book in UW library: eb.ebscohost.com.offcampus.lib.washington.edu/ehost/ebookviewer/ebook/ bmxlYmlXzQzMzgxOF9fQU41?sid=e61a1cb4-3012-4e47- a91d-8e3409d482e3@sessionmgr4004&vid=1&format=EB&rid=1 Oxford Handbook of Health Economics (eds. Glied S and Smith PC) 2011. Available as Kindle e-book for $31.49. Other readings are available as electronic journal arcles through Healthlinks. All ar)cles not available through Healthlinks and some of the book chapters will be provided electronically as needed. 7 Resource: Khan Academy 8 Resource: Commonwealth Fund 9 Resource: Kaiser Family Founda)on 10 Sta)s)cal Abstract of the U.S. 12 Economic Report of the President 13 Agenda • Course ObjecPves, Overview, and Resources • Economic Way of Thinking • Is Health Care Different? • Microeconomics Reminder • Stylized Facts and StasPcal Overview 14 What is the economic way of thinking? 15 What is the Economic Way of Thinking? • Fuchs (“Who Shall Live?”, 1974): Economic point of view is rooted in three observaons: 1. “resources are scarce in relaon to human wants” 2. “resources have alternave uses” 3. “people . have different wants” àBasic economic problem: “how to allocate scarce resources so as to best sasfy human wants” Two contrasng points to view: -”RomanPc”—fails to recognize scarcity -”Monotechnic”—only one way to do things 16 Economics vs. Health Economics • Economics is the study of how societies allocate their inherently scarce resources to satisfy the demands of their citizens. • Health economics focuses on how these scarce resources are allocated to produce health and provide the medical services needed • Economics posits that private markets are generally an “efficient” mechanism for allocating resources, maximizing the benefits received from the limited resources • However, in the case of health care markets, a number of special circumstances occur that require special interventions and adaptations to improve efficiency 17 Rise of Health Economics 18 Aims of Economic Analysis— Two General Approaches • PosiPve (or Behavioral Economics)—What “is” and why is it? • Normave—What “should” be? 19 Economic Analysis Strategies— Two General Approaches • Market failure approach—welfare economics • PoliPcal economy approach—theory of interest groups --Both can be used posi>vely or norma>vely. 20 Economic Perspec)ve: Premise and Implicaons • Key Behavioral Premise: – Individuals act to maximize their happiness (i.e., well-being or “welfare”) by choosing among economic goods (or allocang resources so as to best sasfy wants); economists refer to this as maximizing “ulity.” • Simplest mathemacal formulaon (two goods, one period): – Max U(X,Y) subject to income constraint px X+ pyY = I • Where X and Y are quanPPes of goods X and Y, p’s are prices, and I is income • What can you predict from this? àDemand curves slope downward! • Foundaon of ulitarianism (Jeremy Bentham, 1748-1832) 21 Adam Smith’s “Invisible Hand” “...every individual necessarily labours to render the annual revenue of the society as great as he can. He generally, indeed, neither intends to promote the public interest, nor knows how much he is promoPng it. By preferring the support of domesPc to that of foreign industry, he intends only his own security; and by direcPng that industry in such a manner as its produce may be of the greatest value, he intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intenPon. Nor is it always the worse for the society that it was no part of it. By pursuing his own interest he frequently promotes that of the society more effectually than when he really intends to promote it. I have never known much good done by those who affected to trade for the public good.” Adam Smith on Self-Interest • Man has almost constant occasion for the help of his brethren, and it is in vain for him to expect it from their benevolence only. He will be more likely to prevail if he can interest their self-love in his favour, and show them that it is for their own advantage to do for him what he requires of them. Whoever offers to another a bargain of any kind, proposes to do this. Give me what I want, and you shall have this which you want, is the meaning of every such offer; and it is the manner that we obtain from one another the far greater part of those good offices which we stand in need of. It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest. We address ourselves, not to their humanity but to their self- love. Efficiency Benchmark—Compe))ve Economy (General Equilibrium Model) • Individuals maximize UPlity [U(x1,..xn)] subject to an income constraint • Firms maximize Profits π=px-c(y1..yn) subject a producPon relaonship x=f(y1..yn) • Everyone a price-taker • Result: Pareto-efficient or Pareto-opPmal • How would you choose between two Pareto-efficient distribuPons? IdealiZed Compe))ve Model (1) • “CollecPve acPon enables society to produce, distribute, and consume a great. “ • Premise: individuals generally act in their own best interest. – “Voluntary agreement”—mostly – Policy analysts concerned with “legiPmate coercive powers of government” IdealiZed Compe))ve Model (2) • Model: Perfectly compePPve economy – Many uPlity-maximizing consumers – Many profit-maximizing producers • Under certain assumpPons, leads to “efficient” global outcome—called “Pareto opPmal” – “It would not be possible to change the paerns [of producPon and consumpPon] in such a way as to make some person befer off without making some other person worse off.” • “Market failures”—violaons of assumpPons that would lead to inefficiency – Raonale for government/policy intervenPon. Implicaons of General Equilibrium Theory: 1. Pareto opmality: “If a compePPve equilibrium exists at all, and if all commodiPes are in fact priced in the market, then the equilibrium is necessarily opPmal in the following precise sense (due to V. Pareto): There is no other allocaon of resources to services which will make all parPcipants befer off.” 2. Income redistribuon: “Operaonally, . if the allocaon mechanism in the real world sasfies the