animals Article Processing Matters in Nutrient-Matched Laboratory Diets for Mice—Microbiome Jasmin Wenderlein 1, Linda F. Böswald 2 , Sebastian Ulrich 1 , Ellen Kienzle 2, Klaus Neuhaus 3 , Ilias Lagkouvardos 3,4 , Christian Zenner 5 and Reinhard K. Straubinger 1,* 1 Chair of Bacteriology and Mycology, Institute for Infectious Diseases and Zoonosis, Department of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, LMU Munich, Veterinärstr. 13, 80539 Munich, Germany;
[email protected] (J.W.);
[email protected] (S.U.) 2 Chair of Animal Nutrition and Dietetics, Department of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, LMU Munich, Schönleutenerstr. 8, 85764 Oberschleißheim, Germany;
[email protected] (L.F.B.);
[email protected] (E.K.) 3 Core Facility Microbiome, ZIEL—Institute for Food & Health, Technical University of Munich, Weihenstephaner Berg 3, 85354 Freising, Germany;
[email protected] (K.N.);
[email protected] (I.L.) 4 Hellenic Centre for Marine Research (HCMR), Institute of Marine Biology and Aquaculture (IMBBC), 715 00 Heraklion, Greece 5 Veterinary Immunology Study Group, Department for Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, LMU Munich, Lena-Christ-Str. 48, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany;
[email protected] * Correspondence:
[email protected] Simple Summary: Feed for laboratory mice is available in different physical forms. However, there is insufficient standardization in nutrient composition and physical forms. Results pertaining to energy and nutrient digestibility show that differentially processed feed (pelleted vs. extruded) and Citation: Wenderlein, J.; Böswald, even batches from the same provider (pelleted vs. pelleted) differ in starch gelatinization.