DOCSLIB.ORG

Fauna Monitoring in the Karri Forests of Western Australia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fauna Monitoring in the Karri Forests of Western Australia E R N V M E O N G T E O H F T W A E I S L T A E R R N A U S T Fauna monitoring in the karri forests of Western Australia Fauna monitoring training manual - July 2018 Prepared for the Forest Products Commission Karlene Bain, Python Ecological Services Cover image provided by Karlene Bain. Citation: Bain, K. (2018). Training Manual: Fauna Monitoring in the Karri Forests of Western Australia. Forest Products Commission, Western Australia. Perth Karlene Bain BSc MSc PhD Director Python Ecological Services PO Box 168 Walpole 6398 Email: draconis.wn.com.au Copyright © 2018, Forest Products Commission. All rights reserved. All materials; including internet pages, documents and on-line graphics, audio and video are protected by copyright law. Copyright of these materials resides with the State of Western Australia. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under provisions of the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced or re-used for any purposes whatsoever without prior written permission of the General Manager, Forest Products Commission. Permission to use these materials can be obtained by contacting: Copyright Officer Forest Products Commission Locked Bag 888 PERTH BUSINESS CENTRE WA 6849 AUSTRALIA Telephone: +61 8 9363 4600 Internet: www.fpc.wa.gov.au Email: [email protected] Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this report reflect those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Forest Products Commission. The information contained in this publication is based on knowledge and understanding at the time of writing. The material presented is based on sources that are believed to be reliable. Whilst every care has been taken in the preparation of this publication, the author gives no warranty that the said sources are correct and accepts no responsibility for any resultant errors contained herein, any damages or loss whatsoever caused or suffered by any individual or corporation. Table of Contents 1. Background ..................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Aim of this Plan ............................................................................................................................... 3 3. Fauna Monitoring Objectives .......................................................................................................... 3 4. Targets and Performance Measures ............................................................................................... 3 5. Fauna Monitoring Protocols ......................................................................................................... 13 5.1 Camera trapping ................................................................................................................... 13 5.1.1 Rationale ....................................................................................................................... 13 5.1.2 Camera Types ................................................................................................................ 13 5.1.3 Equipment: .................................................................................................................... 14 5.1.4 Protocols ....................................................................................................................... 15 5.2 Indirect Monitoring Techniques ........................................................................................... 20 5.2.1 Rationale ....................................................................................................................... 20 5.2.2 Equipment ..................................................................................................................... 20 5.2.3 Protocols ....................................................................................................................... 20 5.2.4 Identification of species from faecal pellets ................................................................. 22 5.2.5 Identification of species from runnels .......................................................................... 24 5.2.6 Identification of species from skeletal remains ............................................................ 25 5.2.7 Identification of species from diggings ......................................................................... 25 5.2.8 Identification of species from tree scratches ................................................................ 27 5.2.9 Identification of species from feeding signs ................................................................. 28 5.2.10 Identification of important hollows .............................................................................. 29 5.3 Call Surveys ........................................................................................................................... 32 5.3.1 Rationale ....................................................................................................................... 32 5.3.2 Equipment ..................................................................................................................... 32 5.3.3 Protocols ....................................................................................................................... 34 5.3.4 Cockatoo Identification ................................................................................................. 37 5.4 Data Management and Processing ....................................................................................... 38 5.4.1 Data Types ..................................................................................................................... 38 5.4.2 Data Collection .............................................................................................................. 38 Fauna monitoring training manual Page 1 of 65 Version control: V03/June2018 Authority: Director Operations Responsible Officer: Manager Forest Management Security classification: Public Uncontrolled when printed 6. Training Modules .......................................................................................................................... 41 6.1 Module 1: Effective camera trapping in the field ................................................................ 41 Description .................................................................................................................................... 41 Elements and Performance Criteria .............................................................................................. 41 Required Skills and Knowledge ..................................................................................................... 42 6.2 Module 2: Indirect monitoring techniques .......................................................................... 43 Description .................................................................................................................................... 43 Elements and Performance Criteria .............................................................................................. 43 2.1 Record and save a track on your GPS. .................................................................................... 43 Required Skills and Knowledge ..................................................................................................... 43 6.3 Module 3: Call identification and positioning ...................................................................... 44 Description .................................................................................................................................... 44 Elements and Performance Criteria .............................................................................................. 44 Required Skills and Knowledge ..................................................................................................... 44 6.4 Module 4: Data Management .............................................................................................. 45 Description .................................................................................................................................... 45 Elements and Performance Criteria .............................................................................................. 45 Required Skills and Knowledge ..................................................................................................... 45 7. Assessing Competency .................................................................................................................. 46 8. Planned Evaluation and Review .................................................................................................... 46 9. References .................................................................................................................................... 47 10. APPENDICES .............................................................................................................................. 52 Appendix A: Definitions of conservation codes ............................................................................. 52 Appendix B: Camera Deployment and Capture Record Form (For entry into Excel) .................... 54 Appendix C: Indirect Evidence of Threatened Species – Record Sheet (For entry into Excel) ...... 56 Appendix D: Call survey of Threatened Bird Species – Record Sheet (For entry into Excel) ......... 58 Appendix E: Assessing Competency – Assessment
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Preliminary Risk Assessment of Cane Toads in Kakadu National Park Scientist Report 164, Supervising Scientist, Darwin NT
    supervising scientist 164 report A preliminary risk assessment of cane toads in Kakadu National Park RA van Dam, DJ Walden & GW Begg supervising scientist national centre for tropical wetland research This report has been prepared by staff of the Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist (eriss) as part of our commitment to the National Centre for Tropical Wetland Research Rick A van Dam Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, Locked Bag 2, Jabiru NT 0886, Australia (Present address: Sinclair Knight Merz, 100 Christie St, St Leonards NSW 2065, Australia) David J Walden Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801, Australia George W Begg Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801, Australia This report should be cited as follows: van Dam RA, Walden DJ & Begg GW 2002 A preliminary risk assessment of cane toads in Kakadu National Park Scientist Report 164, Supervising Scientist, Darwin NT The Supervising Scientist is part of Environment Australia, the environmental program of the Commonwealth Department of Environment and Heritage © Commonwealth of Australia 2002 Supervising Scientist Environment Australia GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801 Australia ISSN 1325-1554 ISBN 0 642 24370 0 This work is copyright Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Supervising Scientist Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction
    [Show full text]
  • 080058-92.02.003.Pdf
    ET ' auel$es u?edoJng aculs fpeerE pesroJcrrr l\lrunttrluoc ssorcB A"(tr ecu"qjqslp slc€JJe 'slc"dur Pualxe Jo eABg'EseJoJ lse^\-rDnos eqt ul dlI"lncqJ8d eq1 pur sed,{1 flpnruuoc fww ur srncco uny u?umq 'el"rlsuoruep (686I) slln pu? (686I) sv Ia^?H 'sryvd 'saDl^rlcB uuunq ,(q pecuenulrl 1 ou elB ecu"qJqsrp uorparesuoc 'ecuBqrnFrp puB sryad 'se^reseJ erru"u 'Ese.roJ Jo suJoJ 11u ,(Wngr,,l Pu? p[]"u I€uorlsu 'ecrreJeJrelul elqg su (1411y3) purl pue uorlelJesuoJ Jo seuepunoq eql peJmlq e^ur{ susurnH lueue8eue;,q uBunq ol Euraao ro 'l8Jru"u eq uBc ecu"qJqsr(I go luerugedeq eql ,(q pejalsrururpa sr uJ8)l 's1eed,{wy,rq sepnlcrrr A\ou lurn (sq OOO69I) puzl 1so1n1 '(eun1o,r '7o qqr) o nddo11 .reau pue eSuug drun8uo.ro4 ?qt rtt srernno qlL$ (I peurllno puz (OgOt) pr"ag peurgep '3rg) ,{q 1qep q ,(g are tcutspqng ueJrud\ eql m s! uJ"{ Jo eJueJmaco 'e,r.rlcadsrad 'BrlEDsnV lculsrpqns ueJJsl\ eql Jo seusprmoq eq1 ledrcuud eq1 ruelsertA-rpnos u! (086I puorEer ur ururl peuguoc a lseloJ eW ol slueuoduroc prueg) lculslq luclsqog SuIrBO arp Jo slrulsrpqns €soql Jo tueuefild selqeua puu sed,{l ,{lrunuuoc sazuar! pu? uolr1\ eqt ul mcJo (.to1ot1slaa1p Surmoqq8reu sB s" "tsls prnl IIor lseroJ lp sn1dQocng) I!s{ Surw4uoc sed,& flnmururo3 sapnlcul rl esneceq a8ute,roc Jo RaJBJno su laulslFlns 'sed,$ I"cluBlog uaJJ"rt\ eql epnlcul e,vr acue11 NOIICn(IOUJNI '1uaurce?uetu I"luau.uedxe pur Suuoluour IeJfoloce ur elol ?urseaJcur uB o1"l JJuls lworSeg 'fgo1oco actreq:nlsrp ur pepueurutocar sl qd?rser pe$euo ssarord ol qc"ordde ,ft"uldrcslpBlnu V 'sequouo oq? e:s ser:redsaseql;o
    [Show full text]
  • OWLS of OHIO C D G U I D E B O O K DIVISION of WILDLIFE Introduction O W L S O F O H I O
    OWLS OF OHIO c d g u i d e b o o k DIVISION OF WILDLIFE Introduction O W L S O F O H I O Owls have longowls evoked curiosity in In the winter of of 2002, a snowy ohio owl and stygian owl are known from one people, due to their secretive and often frequented an area near Wilmington and two Texas records, respectively. nocturnal habits, fierce predatory in Clinton County, and became quite Another, the Oriental scops-owl, is behavior, and interesting appearance. a celebrity. She was visited by scores of known from two Alaska records). On Many people might be surprised by people – many whom had never seen a global scale, there are 27 genera of how common owls are; it just takes a one of these Arctic visitors – and was owls in two families, comprising a total bit of knowledge and searching to find featured in many newspapers and TV of 215 species. them. The effort is worthwhile, as news shows. A massive invasion of In Ohio and abroad, there is great owls are among our most fascinating northern owls – boreal, great gray, and variation among owls. The largest birds, both to watch and to hear. Owls Northern hawk owl – into Minnesota species in the world is the great gray are also among our most charismatic during the winter of 2004-05 became owl of North America. It is nearly three birds, and reading about species with a major source of ecotourism for the feet long with a wingspan of almost 4 names like fearful owl, barking owl, North Star State.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Fossil Record of the Australian Land Snail Genus
    RECORDS OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 34 038–050 (2019) DOI: 10.18195/issn.0312-3162.34(1).2019.038-050 Review of the fossil record of the Australian land snail genus Bothriembryon Pilsbry, 1894 (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Bothriembryontidae): new distributional and geological data Corey S. Whisson1,2* and Helen E. Ryan3 1 Department of Aquatic Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Western Australia 6986, Australia. 2 School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia. 3 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Western Australia 6986, Australia. * Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT – The land snail genus Bothriembryon Pilsbry, 1894, endemic to southern Australia, contains seven fossil and 39 extant species, and forms part of the Gondwanan family Bothriembryontidae. Little published data on the geographical distribution of fossil Bothriembryon exists. In this study, fossil and modern data of Bothriembryon from nine Australian museums and institutes were mapped for the first time. The fossilBothriembryon collection in the Western Australian Museum was curated to current taxonomy. Using this data set, the geological age of fossil and extant species was documented. Twenty two extant Bothriembryon species were identified in the fossil collection, with 15 of these species having a published fossil record for the first time. Several fossil and extant species had range extensions. The geological age span of Bothriembryon was determined as a minimum of Late Oligocene to recent, with extant endemic Western Australian Bothriembryon species determined as younger, traced to Pleistocene age. Extant Bothriembryon species from the Nullarbor region were older, dated Late Pliocene to Early Pleistocene.
    [Show full text]
  • Strigiformes) and Lesser Nighthawks (Chodeiles Acutipennis
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE The Evolution of Quiet Flight in Owls (Strigiformes) and Lesser Nighthawks (Chodeiles acutipennis) A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology by Krista Le Piane December 2020 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Christopher J. Clark, Chairperson Dr. Erin Wilson Rankin Dr. Khaleel A. Razak Copyright by Krista Le Piane 2020 The Dissertation of Krista Le Piane is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I thank my Oral Exam Committee: Dr. Khaleel A. Razak (chairperson), Dr. Erin Wilson Rankin, Dr. Mark Springer, Dr. Jesse Barber, and Dr. Scott Curie. Thank you to my Dissertation Committee: Dr. Christopher J. Clark (chairperson), Dr. Erin Wilson Rankin, and Dr. Khaleel A. Razak for their encouragement and help with this dissertation. Thank you to my lab mates, past and present: Dr. Sean Wilcox, Dr. Katie Johnson, Ayala Berger, David Rankin, Dr. Nadje Najar, Elisa Henderson, Dr. Brian Meyers Dr. Jenny Hazelhurst, Emily Mistick, Lori Liu, and Lilly Hollingsworth for their friendship and support. I thank the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (LACM), the California Academy of Sciences (CAS), Museum of Vertebrate Zoology (MVZ) at UC Berkeley, the American Museum of Natural History (ANMH), and the Natural History Museum (NHM) in Tring for access to specimens used in Chapter 1. I would especially like to thank Kimball Garrett and Allison Shultz for help at LACM. I also thank Ben Williams, Richard Jackson, and Reddit user NorthernJoey for permission to use their photos in Chapter 1. Jessica Tingle contributed R code and advice to Chapter 1 and I would like to thank her for her help.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of Threatened Bird Species in the Hunter Region
    !"#$%&$'$()*+#(),-$.+$,)/0'&$#)1$2+3') !"$)4"+,&5$#)!"#$%&%'6)789:) The status of threatened bird species in the Hunter Region Michael Roderick1 and Alan Stuart2 156 Karoola Road, Lambton, NSW 2299 281 Queens Road, New Lambton, NSW 2305 ) ;%'<)*+#(),-$.+$,)5+,&$()%,)=05'$#%*5$>)?'(%'2$#$()3#)@#+&+.%55<)?'(%'2$#$()A.355$.&+B$5<)#$C$##$()&3)%,) !"#$%&"%'%()*+,'(%$+"#%+!"#$%&$'$()*+$,-$.)/0'.$#1%&-0')2,&)3445)ADE4F)have been recorded within the Hunter Region. The majority are resident or regular migrants. Some species are vagrants, and some seabirds) #$205%#5<) -#$,$'&) %#$) '3&) #$5+%'&) 3') &"$) 1$2+3') C3#) ,0#B+B%5G) !"$) %0&"3#,) "%B$) #$B+$H$() &"$) #$2+3'%5),&%&0,)3C)%55),-$.+$,>)H+&")-%#&+.05%#)C3.0,)3')&"$)#$,+($'&,)%'()#$205%#)B+,+&3#,G)!"$).3',$#B%&+3') ,&%&0,)C3#)$%."),-$.+$,)+,)2+B$'>)+'.50(+'2)H"$#$)#$5$B%'&)&"$),&%&0,)0'($#)&"$)Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth) and the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) review. R$.$'&)#$.3#(,)C3#)&"$)1$2+3')%#$).3I-%#$()H+&")-#$B+30,)-$#+3(,>)53.%5)&"#$%&,) %#$)#$B+$H$()%'()&"$)30&533J)C3#)$%."),-$.+$,)+,)(+,.0,,$(G)) ) ) INTRODUCTION is relevant. The two measures of conservation status are: The Threatened Species Conservation (TSC) Act 1995 is the primary legislation for the protection of The Environment Protection and Biodiversity threatened flora and fauna species in NSW. The Conservation (EPBC) Act 1999 is the NSW Scientific Committee is the key group equivalent threatened species legislation at the responsible for the review of the conservation Commonwealth level. status of threatened species, including the listing of those species. More than 100 bird species are A measure of conservation status that can also listed as threatened under the TSC Act, and the be applied at sub-species level was developed Scientific Committee supports the listing of by the International Union for Conservation of additional species.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Western Australia's Waterways
    The Importance of Western Australia's Waterways There are 208 major waterways in Western Australia with a combined length of more than 25000 km. Forty-eight have been identified as 'wild rivers' due to their near pristine condition. Waterways and their fringing vegetation have important ecological, economic and cultural values. They provide habitat for birds, frogs, reptiles, native fish and macroinvertebrates and form important wildlife corridors between patches of remnant bush. Estuaries, where river and ocean waters mix, connect the land to the sea and have their own unique array of aquatic and terrestrial flora and fauna. Waterways, and water, have important spiritual and cultural significance for Aboriginal people. Many waterbodies such as rivers, soaks, springs, rock holes and billabongs have Aboriginal sites associated with them. Waterways became a focal point for explorers and settlers with many of the State’s towns located near them. Waterways supply us with food and drinking water, irrigation for agriculture and water for aquaculture and horticulture. They are valuable assets for tourism and An impacted south-west river section - salinisation and erosion on the upper Frankland River. Photo are prized recreational areas. S. Neville ECOTONES. Many are internationally recognised and protected for their ecological values, such as breeding grounds and migration stopovers for birds. WA has several Ramsar sites including lakes Gore and Warden on the south coast, the Ord River floodplain in the Kimberley and the Peel Harvey Estuarine system, which is the largest Ramsar site in the south west of WA. Some waterways are protected within national parks for their ecosystem values and beauty.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds in and Around Blackall
    Birds in and around Blackall Apostle bird Eastern Rosella Red backed Kingfisher Australasian Grebe Emu Red-backed Fairy-wren Australasian Shoveler Eurasian Coot Red-breasted Button Quail Australian Bustard Forest Kingfisher Red-browed Pardalote Australian Darter Friary Martin Red-capped Robin Australian Hobby Galah Red-chested Buttonquail Australian Magpie Glossy Ibis Red-tailed Black-Cockatoo Australian Magpie-lark Golden-headed Cisticola Red-winged Parrot Australian Owlet-nightjar Great (Black) Cormorant Restless Flycatcher Australian Pelican Great Egret Richard’s Pipit Australian Pipit Grey (White) Goshawk Royal Spoonbill Australian Pratincole Grey Butcherbird Rufous Fantail Australian Raven Grey Fantail Rufous Songlark Australian Reed Warbler Grey Shrike-thrush Rufous Whistler Australian White Ibis Grey Teal Sacred Ibis Australian Ringneck (mallee form) Grey-crowned Babbler Sacred Kingfisher Australian Wood Duck Grey-fronted Honeyeater Singing Bushlark Baillon’s Crake Grey-headed Honeyeater Singing Honeyeater Banded Honeyeater Hardhead Southern Boobook Owl Barking Owl Hoary-headed Grebe Spinifex Pigeon Barn Owl Hooded Robin Spiny-cheeked Honeyeater Bar-shouldered Dove Horsfield's Bronze-Cuckoo Splendid Fairy-wren Black Falcon House Sparrow Spotted Bowerbird Black Honeyeater Inland Thornbill Spotted Nightjar Black Kite Intermediate Egret Square-tailed kite Black-chinned Honeyeater Jacky Winter Squatter Pigeon Black-faced Cuckoo-shrike Laughing Kookaburra Straw-necked Ibis Black-faced Woodswallow Little Black Cormorant Striated Pardalote
    [Show full text]
  • Eton Range Realignment Project ATTACHMENT 2 to EPBC Ref: 2015/7552 Preliminary Documentation Residual Impact Assessment and Offset Proposal - 37
    APPENDIX 3: KSAT RESULTS – PELLET COUNTS Table 5: KSAT results per habitat tree. Species Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 Site 6 Total Eucalyptus tereticornis 9 30 16 - 42 7 104 Eucalyptus crebra 91 16 29 2 0 25 163 Corymbia clarksoniana 11 0 0 1 4 5 21 Corymbia tessellaris 5 0 0 0 0 20 25 Corymbia dallachiana - 12 - - - - 12 Corymbia intermedia - 3 1 0 11 - 15 Corymbia erythrophloia - - 0 - 0 - 0 Eucalyptus platyphylla - - - 0 0 0 0 Lophostemon - - - 0 0 - 0 suaveolens Total 116 61 46 3 57 57 Ref: NCA15R30439 Page 22 27 November 2015 Copyright 2015 Kleinfelder APPENDIX 4: SITE PHOTOS The following images were taken from the centre of each BioCondition quadrat and represent a north east south west aspect, top left to bottom right. Ref: NCA15R30439 Page 23 27 November 2015 Copyright 2015 Kleinfelder Plate 3: BioCondition quadrat 1 (RE11.3.4/11.12.3) Ref: NCA15R30439 Page 24 27 November 2015 Copyright 2015 Kleinfelder Plate 4: BioCondition quadrat 2 (RE11.3.4/11.12.3) Ref: NCA15R30439 Page 25 27 November 2015 Copyright 2015 Kleinfelder Plate 5: BioCondition quadrat 3 (RE11.12.3) Ref: NCA15R30439 Page 26 27 November 2015 Copyright 2015 Kleinfelder Plate 6: BioCondition quadrat 4 (RE11.3.9) Ref: NCA15R30439 Page 27 27 November 2015 Copyright 2015 Kleinfelder Plate 7: BioCondition quadrat 5 (RE11.3.25) Ref: NCA15R30439 Page 28 27 November 2015 Copyright 2015 Kleinfelder Plate 8: BioCondition quadrat 6 (RE11.12.3/11.3.4/11.3.9) Ref: NCA15R30439 Page 29 27 November 2015 Copyright 2015 Kleinfelder Appendix E: Desktop Assessment for Potential
    [Show full text]
  • Report Nnual
    DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND LAND MANAGEMENT nnual eport A R 2002-2003 HIGHLIGHTS OF THE YEAR Our Vision Our Principles Our Responsibilities A natural environment In making decisions we will be guided The Department of Conservation and in Western Australia that by the following principles: Land Management is part of a greater retains its biodiversity and • The diversity and health of ecological conservation community and has enriches people’s lives. communities and native species distinct State Government throughout WA will be maintained responsibilities for implementing and restored. Government policy within that • Where there are threats of serious or community. Conservation is a irreversible damage, the lack of full collective role. scientific certainty shall not be used Our Mission as a reason for postponing measures We have the lead responsibility for which seek to prevent loss of conserving the State’s rich diversity of In partnership with the community, biodiversity. native plants, animals and natural we conserve Western Australia’s • Users of the environment and ecosystems, and many of its unique biodiversity, and manage the lands resources will pay fair value for that landscapes. On behalf of the people of use. and waters entrusted to us, for their Western Australia, we manage more • Use of wildlife will be on the basis of than 24 million hectares, including intrinsic values and for the ecological sustainability. more than 9 per cent of WA’s land area: appreciation and benefit of present • Outcomes will be delivered in the most its national parks, marine parks, and future generations. effective and efficient way. conservation parks, regional parks, • Cooperation, sharing and integration State forests and timber reserves, of resources and knowledge within the nature reserves, and marine nature Department and between reserves.
    [Show full text]
  • Dry Season Diet of a Barking Owl Ninox Connivens Peninsularis on Adolphus Island in the North of Western Australia
    Corella, 2016, 40(4): 101-102 Dry season diet of a Barking Owl Ninox connivens peninsularis on Adolphus Island in the north of Western Australia Russell Palmer1* and Wesley Caton1, 2 1Science and Conservation Division, Department of Parks and Wildlife, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, Western Australia, 6983. 2 Evolution Fauna Consultancy, 29 Tugun Street, Tugun, Queensland, 4224. *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Received: 22 December 2015 The Barking Owl Ninox connivens is a medium-sized hawk- Adolphus Island (4138 ha), which is situated in the southern owl that is associated with the open forest and woodland section of Cambridge Gulf, 35 kilometres north of Wyndham. environments of mainland Australia (Higgins 1999). Two The vegetation is dominated by open eucalypt woodlands, subspecies are recognised. The larger N. c. connivens (males Acacia shrublands, grasslands and fringing, low-lying mud flats 695 g, females 592 g) occurs in southern and eastern Australia, with extensive areas of mangal (mangrove swamp forest). whilst the smaller N. c. peninsularis (males 501 g, females 440 g) is restricted to the north of the continent (Higgins 1999). The Standard survey techniques were used to record the island’s Barking Owl is common in the wet-dry tropics, but uncommon vertebrate fauna (details in Gibson et al. 2015). to rare and declining in the temperate zone (Debus 2009; Parker et al. 2007). A single Barking Owl was observed on three occasions roosting in a cluster of fig trees Ficus atricha (15°06’33”S, Fleay (1968) described the species as a robust and versatile 128°09’07”E), under which seven fresh, egested pellets were owl.
    [Show full text]
  • Landcorp Denmark East Development Precinct Flora and Fauna Survey
    LandCorp Denmark East Development Precinct Flora and Fauna Survey October 2016 Executive summary Introduction Through the Royalties for Regions “Growing our South” initiative, the Shire of Denmark has received funding to provide a second crossing of the Denmark River, to upgrade approximately 6.5 km of local roads and to support the delivery of an industrial estate adjacent to McIntosh Road. GHD Pty Ltd (GHD) was commissioned by LandCorp to undertake a biological assessment of the project survey area. The purpose of the assessment was to identify and describe flora, vegetation and fauna within the survey area. The outcomes of the assessment will be used in the environmental assessment and approvals process and will identify the possible need for, and scope of, further field investigations will inform environmental impact assessment of the road upgrades. The survey area is approximately 68.5 ha in area and includes a broad area of land between Scotsdale Road and the Denmark River and the road reserve and adjacent land along East River Road and McIntosh Road between the Denmark Mt Barker Road and South Western Highway. A 200 m section north and south along the Denmark Mt Barker Road from East River Road was also surveyed. The biological assessment involved a desktop review and three separate field surveys, including a winter flora and fauna survey, spring flora and fauna survey and spring nocturnal fauna survey. Fauna surveys also included the use of movement sensitive cameras in key locations. Key biological aspects The key biological aspects and constraints identified for the survey area are summarised in the following table.
    [Show full text]