DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Returns to Public Agricultural Spending in the Cocoa and Noncocoa Subsectors of Ghana

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Returns to Public Agricultural Spending in the Cocoa and Noncocoa Subsectors of Ghana RETURNS TO PUBLIC AGRICULTURAL SPENDING IN THE COCOA AND NONCOCOA SUBSECTORS OF GHANA Samuel Benin ([email protected]) International Food Policy Research Institute Paper submitted for the The Annual Bank Conference on Africa Berkeley, California June 5 – 6, 2017 The Challenges and Opportunities of Transforming African Agriculture 1 RETURNS TO PUBLIC AGRICULTURAL SPENDING IN THE COCOA AND NONCOCOA SUBSECTORS OF GHANA ABSTRACT Using public expenditure and agricultural production data on Ghana from 1961 to 2012, this paper assesses the returns to public spending in the agricultural sector, taking into consideration expenditures on agriculture as a whole and then separately for expenditures in the cocoa versus the noncocoa subsectors. Different regression methods and related diagnostic tests are used to address potential endogeneity of agricultural expenditure, cross- subsector dependence of the production function error terms, and within-subsector serial correlation of the error terms. The estimated elasticities are then used to calculate the rate of return to expenditures in the sector as a whole and within the two subsectors. The elasticity of land productivity with respect to total agricultural expenditure is estimated at 0.33–0.34. For the noncocoa subsector, the estimated elasticity is 0.66–0.81. And in the cocoa subsector, it is 0.36–0.43. The returns to total agricultural expenditure are estimated at 82–84 percent for the aggregate analysis. For the disaggregated sectorial analysis, the returns to expenditure in the noncocoa subsector are estimated at 437–524 percent, whereas the returns to expenditure in the cocoa subsector are estimated at 11–14 percent. Implications are discussed for raising overall productivity of expenditure in the sector, as well as for further studies. Keywords: agricultural expenditure, cocoa, Ghana, rate of return JEL Codes: C20, H50, Q10 2 RETURNS TO PUBLIC AGRICULTURAL SPENDING IN THE COCOA AND NONCOCOA SUBSECTORS OF GHANA 1. INTRODUCTION This paper examines past patterns of government spending on agriculture in Ghana, and how that spending has impacted on agricultural productivity growth. The scope and rigor of the analysis is constrained by the available data, and only partial insights are possible. The paper is structured as follows. The next section examines trends in public agriculture spending over the period 1961-2012, and disaggregates that spending into the cocoa and noncocoa sectors. While Ghana’s allocation of its total expenditure to agriculture is similar to that of many other Africa countries, the lion’s share of that spending has gone into the cocoa subsector, while the noncocoa subsector, which includes all the country’s food staples, has been about as neglected as elsewhere. The subsequent sections deals with econometric analyses that estimate the impact of public spending on agricultural productivity growth, and provide some useful insights into the marginal returns to public investments in the cocoa and noncocoa subsectors. This is followed by our concluding section. 2. TRENDS IN PUBLIC AGRICULTURE SPENDING, 1961-2012 2.1 Data Sources Data on public agriculture expenditure in Ghana were compiled from various national and international sources from 1961 to 2012 for the agriculture sector as a whole, and separately for the cocoa and noncocoa subsectors (Table 1). The noncocoa subsector includes noncocoa crops (including food staples), livestock, forestry, and fishery. The cocoa subsector is managed exclusively by the Ghana Cocoa Board. Data on total government expenditure, which, by subtracting agricultural expenditure, is used to calculate nonagricultural expenditure, were also obtained from the above sources. Agricultural production data were compiled from FAOStat, and disaggregated for the cocoa and noncocoa subsectors. The supplementary table in the annex shows details of how the annual expenditure data were compiled, including the sources for each data point. Table 1: Data sources for public spending and agricultural output, 1961-2012 Variable Description/Disaggregation Data sources Total Total government expenditure in constant 2006 Stryker (1990), IMF expenditure GHS, million, disaggregated into recurrent and (1998, 2000, 2005), (TE) capital expenditures Kolavalli et al. (2012), Agricultural Government expenditure on agriculture in constant MOFA (2013), GCB public 2006 GHS, million, disaggregated into: (2013), CAGD (2011, 2013, 2014), IFPRI 3 expenditure Cocoa subsector (2015), World Bank (agEXP) Noncocoa subsector (noncocoa crops, livestock, (2015) forestry, fishery) Agricultural Gross output in constant 2004-2006 GHS divided by FAO (2016) output per agricultural area (including arable land, permanent hectare (Y) crops, permanent meadows and pastures, forest area, and inland water), disaggregated into: Cocoa subsector Noncocoa subsector 2.2 Trends in Public Agriculture Expenditure and Output per Hectare Trends in agricultural public expenditure and gross agricultural output per hectare of agricultural land are shown in Figures 1 and 2, respectively, and Table 2. There have been considerable fluctuations in public spending over the years, driven by changing governments and their policy agendas, but very little upward trend until the 1990s after the policy reforms. Government spending on the cocoa subsector has far exceeded government spending on the noncocoa subsector, a gap that has widened since the 1990s. Average land productivity has grown slowly but steadily over the years, but despite the spending bias towards the cocoa subsector, nearly all the increase in total land productivity has arisen from the noncocoa subsector. Figure 1: Agricultural public expenditure in Ghana by subsector, 1961–2012 1000 Total Noncocoa Cocoa 800 600 400 200 Constant 2006 GHS, million 0 1961 1966 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011 Source: Author’s illustration based on compiled data (see Table 1 and Annex). Note: GHS = Ghanaian cedi. 4 Figure 2: Agricultural output per hectare by subsector in Ghana, 1961–2012 600 Total Noncocoa Cocoa 400 2006 2006 GHS - per hectare per 200 Constant 2004 0 1961 1966 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011 Source: Author’s illustration based on FAO (2016). Note: GHS = Ghanaian cedi. To better understand these trends and fluctuations in public expenditure, it is useful to relate them to the underlying agricultural policies of successive governments. Major influential factors include the following: Until 1990, there was direct agricultural production by the government through state farms and cooperatives. Subsidization of farm production stopped in 1990 and returned in 2007. Implementation of policies and strategies was mostly through projects until the 1990s and then through programs and sector-wide approaches afterward. Government and public spending was decentralized, including the enactment of the Local Government Law in 1988, establishment of the District Assembly Common Fund in 1993, and implementation of direct district budgeting and execution starting in 2012. Agricultural public expenditure reviews were conducted in 1977, 1998, 2006, and 2012. The country signed the CAADP compact in 2009. Table 2 summarizes the trends in public expenditure and land productivity by sub-periods that correspond to successive governments, beginning in 1958. A short summary of the agricultural policies of each period follows. Table 2: Agricultural expenditure and output per hectare by subsector in Ghana, 1961– 2012 Indicator 1961– 1966– 1972– 1980– 1982– 1993– 2001– 2009– 1965 1971 1979 1981 1992 2000 2008 2012 Agriculture expenditure, growth rate (%) 5 Total 2.3 1.0 3.6 –11.3 4.2 6.1 4.3 6.7 Cocoa 3.8 3.9 –3.0 –15.6 5.9 6.4 1.0 1.5 Noncocoa 1.0 -1.4 9.0 –6.1 1.1 4.9 17.8 23.7 Agriculture expenditure (% of output) Total 17.4 9.5 15.3 11.8 8.8 6.5 9.4 10.8 Cocoa 30.1 19.1 40.7 45.3 70.9 53.9 76.5 90.3 Noncocoa 12.7 7.0 10.1 6.4 2.5 2.0 2.1 2.9 Agriculture output per hectare, growth rate (%) Total 2.4 4.2 -2.4 0.8 5.9 3.8 3.5 3.9 Cocoa 3.1 3.4 -6.0 -11.1 5.8 6.9 10.0 7.7 Noncocoa 2.1 4.5 -1.8 2.8 5.8 4.1 3.2 3.6 Source: Author’s calculation based on compiled data (see Tables 5.1 and 5A). 1958 to 1966 The post-Independence policies of the Convention People’s Party government led by Dr. Kwame Nkrumah extended from 1951 to 1966, and were dictated by the overall economic development agenda of rapid industrialization, which was primarily financed by taxing agriculture. An Agricultural Development Corporation (ADC) was established to promote the production of export crops (mainly cocoa) for foreign exchange earnings and production of industrial crops (mainly rubber, sugar cane, oil palm, and cotton) to feed the ambitious local factories that were being set up. As such, the bulk of agriculture expenditure was allocated to ADC and spent on input subsidies (imports of fertilizers, other chemicals, tractors, and implements) and on distribution and marketing of produce. Following the ADC’s forced closure in 1962, due to its accumulated large debts and unsuccessful large-scale production and marketing activities, state farms and cooperatives were established to take over ADC’s projects and the ministry’s stations. Price controls, input and credit subsidies, and obligatory credit allocations continued to be used to support the heavy state involvement in agricultural production, distribution, and marketing (Stryker 1990; Dappah 1995). At the time of Nkrumah government’s overthrow in 1966, there were 105 state farms (42 of them were inherited from ADC) cultivating about 22,396 hectares, with 62 percent under permanent crops (mainly rubber, oil palm, sugar cane, cotton, coconut, banana, and kola nut) and the remaining 38 percent under food crops (mainly maize and rice) (Austin and Luckham 1975). As Table 2 shows, agriculture expenditure in 1961–1965 grew at an annual average rate of 2.3 percent, with expenditures on cocoa growing faster (3.8 percent) than combined expenditures on the noncocoa subsector (1.0 percent).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ghana Census of Agriculture Ghana Statistical Service Head Office Email: [email protected] Cell: 0242- 546-810
    GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE Leader in the Production of Official Statistics in Ghana PRESS STATEMENT FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE TITLE: STATISTICAL SERVICE CONDUCTS CENSUS OF AGRICULTURE Accra – April 23, 2018 (Ghana Statistical Service Head Office) - The Ghana Statistical Service (GSS), in collaboration with the Ministry of Food and Agriculture (MoFA), is conducting a Census of Agriculture from 30 April 2018 to mid-July 2018. The Census of Agriculture will collect information from households and institutions, and their involvement in agricultural activities in the country. The information to be collected is critical for: 1. Policy makers to better identify, prepare, implement and evaluate development projects aimed at enhancing agriculture in Ghana; 2. Providing other data users with up-to-date and reliable agriculture statistics for programming and monitoring food security and livelihood programmes, among others. 3. Addressing environmental issues especially at the community level; 4. Providing more up-to-date data on the structure of agriculture in the country, vital to the rebasing of Ghana’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The main data collection of the Census begins on 30 April 2018, and will last for approximately ten weeks. Field personnel will visit all households and institutions across the country to identify for enumeration, those engaged` in the production of: all types of food crop; all types of tree 1 planting activities; all types of livestock; all types of aquaculture, as well as those who do fishing, in both inland and offshore waters. We entreat the general public to cooperate with the Census of Agriculture enumerators and provide the required information. A successful Agriculture Census is essential for the development of Ghana.
    [Show full text]
  • Irrigated Urban Vegetable Production in Ghana
    Irrigated Urban Vegetable Production in Ghana Characteristics, Benefits and Risk Mitigation Second Edition Edited by Pay Drechsel and Bernard Keraita Irrigated Urban Vegetable Production in Ghana: Characteristics, Benefits and Risk Mitigation Edited by Pay Drechsel and Bernard Keraita Second Edition IWMI October 2014 Editors: Pay Drechsel (IWMI) and Bernard Keraita (University of Copenhagen) Contributing authors: Adriana Allen and Alexandre Apsan Frediani, University College London, UK; Andrea Silverman, University of California, Berkeley, USA; Andrew Adam- Bradford, Human Relief Foundation, UK; Bernard Keraita, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Emmanuel Obuobie, Water Research Institute, CSIR, Ghana; George Danso, University of Alberta, Canada; Gerald Forkuor, University of Wuerzburg, Germany; Gordana Kranjac-Berisavljevic, University for Development Studies, Ghana; Hanna Karg, University of Freiburg, Germany; Irene Egyir, University of Ghana, Ghana; Lesley Hope, University of Bochum, Germany; Liqa Raschid-Sally, Sri Lanka; Manuel Henseler, Switzerland; Marielle Dubbeling, RUAF Foundation, The Netherlands; Matthew Wood-Hill, University College London, UK; Olufunke O. Cofie, IWMI, Ghana; Pay Drechsel, IWMI, Sri Lanka; Philip Amoah, IWMI, Ghana; Razak Seidu, Ålesund University College, Norway; René van Veenhuizen, RUAF Foundation, The Netherlands; Robert C. Abaidoo, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science & Technology, Ghana; Sampson K. Agodzo, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science & Technology, Ghana; Senorpe Asem-Hiablie, The Pennsylvania
    [Show full text]
  • The Preliminary Exploration and Analysis of Bamboo Industry in the Macro and Micro Environment of Ghana
    The Preliminary Exploration and Analysis of Bamboo Industry in the Macro and Micro Environment of Ghana By: Bo Lin Supervisor: Syed Afraz Gillani Supported by: April 2018 Content Acknowledgments ............................................................................................. III List of Tables ...................................................................................................... V List of Figures .................................................................................................... VI List of Abbreviations ......................................................................................... VII 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background of the Research .................................................................... 1 1.2 Problem Statement ................................................................................... 2 1.3 Research Questions ................................................................................. 3 1.4 Research Objectives ................................................................................ 3 1.5 Significance of the Research .................................................................... 4 1.6 Scope and Structure ................................................................................. 5 2. Literature Review and Preliminary Research ................................................. 5 2.1 Profiles of Bamboo Resources ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Chair of the African Union
    Th e Chair of the African Union What prospect for institutionalisation? THE EVOLVING PHENOMENA of the Pan-African organisation to react timeously to OF THE CHAIR continental and international events. Th e Moroccan delegation asserted that when an event occurred on the Th e chair of the Pan-African organisation is one position international scene, member states could fail to react as that can be scrutinised and defi ned with diffi culty. Its they would give priority to their national concerns, or real political and institutional signifi cance can only be would make a diff erent assessment of such continental appraised through a historical analysis because it is an and international events, the reason being that, con- institution that has evolved and acquired its current trary to the United Nations, the OAU did not have any shape and weight through practical engagements. Th e permanent representatives that could be convened at any expansion of the powers of the chairperson is the result time to make a timely decision on a given situation.2 of a process dating back to the era of the Organisation of Th e delegation from Sierra Leone, a former member African Unity (OAU) and continuing under the African of the Monrovia group, considered the hypothesis of Union (AU). the loss of powers of the chairperson3 by alluding to the Indeed, the desirability or otherwise of creating eff ect of the possible political fragility of the continent on a chair position had been debated among members the so-called chair function. since the creation of the Pan-African organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Commercialization and Its Impacts on Land Tenure Relations
    University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh UNIVERSITY OF GHANA INSTITUTE OF AFRICAN STUDIES AGRICULTURAL COMMERCIALIZATION AND ITS IMPACTS ON LAND TENURE RELATIONS IN THE NANUMBA NORTH DISTRICT BY ALIU AMINU (10508519) THIS THESIS IS SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF GHANA, LEGON IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE AWARD OF MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY DEGREE IN AFRICAN STUDIES JULY, 2016 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh DECLARATION I hereby declare that this thesis is the result of my own research work and I remain solely responsible for any shortcomings in this study. The research was carried out in the Institute of African Studies, University of Ghana, under the supervision of Professor Kojo S. Amanor and Dr. Osman Alhassan. All relevant references cited in this work have been duly acknowledged. This work is not presented in full or in part to any other institution for examination. Aliu Aminu (10508519) …………………… ………………….. Student name and ID Signature Date Principal Supervisor Professor Kojo S. Amanor ……………… …………………. Signature Date Co- Supervisor Dr. Osman Alhassan …...……………… ………………....... Signature Date i University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh DEDICATION This research work is dedicated to my late Father, Mumuni Aliu (Zori Aliu) who died during my course work on this programme and my late Mother, Mahama Azara, for the faith and confidence she reposed in me at early hours of my education. ii University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My special thanks go to my two supervisors, Professor Kojo S. Amanor and Dr. Osman Alhassan for accepting to supervise this thesis and the professional manner they guided me through this research work.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Measures of New Regime. President Kwame Nkrumah of Ghana, While on a Visit to Communist China, Was Deposed on Feb
    Keesing's Record of World Events (formerly Keesing's Contemporary Archives), Volume 12, March, 1966 Ghana, Page 21273 © 1931-2006 Keesing's Worldwide, LLC - All Rights Reserved. Initial Measures of New Regime. President Kwame Nkrumah of Ghana, while on a visit to Communist China, was deposed on Feb. 24 as the result of swift action in an Army coup which established in power a National Liberation Council led by Major-General Joseph A. Ankrah, the former Chief of Defence Staff of the Army. In the early hours of Feb. 24 units of the Ghanaian Army occupied key installations in Accra and the other principal towns and attacked President Nkrumah's presidential guard of about 200 men at Flagstaff House, the President's strongly fortified palace in Accra; many of the guard surrendered by 11 a.m. and were arrested, but others continued to resist until the following day. One of the coup leaders, Brigadier A. K. Ocran [see below], said on March 7 that the action had been carried out by two brigades totalling 3,000 men, and that no more than 27 persons had lost their lives, including seven members of the Army and between 10 and 20 presidential guards at Flagstaff House. Among those killed was Major-General Charles M. Barwah, the Deputy Chief of Staff. The leader of the military action, Colonel Emmanuel Kwashie Kotoka (the commander of the 2nd Army Brigade stationed in Kumasi) announced in a broadcast on Feb. 24: “The myth surrounding Kwame Nkrumah has been broken.” President Nkrumah and all his Ministers, Colonel Kotoka stated, had been dismissed, his Convention People's Party (C.P.P.) declared illegal, and Parliament dissolved.
    [Show full text]
  • Architects from Socialist Countries in Ghana (1957–67): Modern Architecture and Mondialisation
    4 74 December 2015 Architects from Social- ist Countries in Ghana (1957–67) Figure 1 Vic Adegbite (chief architect), Jacek Chyrosz (design architect), Stanisław Rymaszewski (design architect), International Trade Fair, Accra, 1967 (photo by Jacek Chyrosz, 1967; Jacek Chyrosz Archive, Warsaw; courtesy of Jacek Chyrosz). This content downloaded from 23.235.32.0 on Thu, 3 Dec 2015 04:27:30 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Architects from Socialist Countries in Ghana (1957– 67): Modern Architecture and Mondialisation łukasz stanek University of Manchester hen seen from Labadi Road, the buildings of were employed by the GNCC on a contract with Polservice, Accra’s International Trade Fair (ITF) appear the so-called central agency of foreign trade, which mediated W among abandoned billboards, scarce trees that the export of labor from socialist Poland.4 At the GNCC, offer shade to resting taxi drivers, and tables where coconuts, they worked together with Ghanaian architects and foreign bottled water, sweets, and telephone cards are sold next to the professionals, many from socialist countries. road.1 The buildings neighbor the La settlement, where streets This collaboration reflected the alliance of Nkrumah’s meander between houses, shops, bars, schools, and shrines, government with socialist countries, which was demon- while on the other side of Labadi Road, at the seashore, a luxuri- strated at the fair by the exhibitions of Czechoslovakia, the ous housing estate is under construction next to upscale hotels German Democratic Republic (GDR), Hungary, and Poland that overlook Labadi Beach. Kwame Nkrumah, Ghana’s leader (Figure 3). At the same time, the Ankrah administration used after the country achieved independence (1957), initiated the the fair to facilitate Ghana’s reopening toward the West.
    [Show full text]
  • Document of the International Fund for Agricultural Development Republic
    Document of the International Fund for Agricultural Development Republic of Ghana Upper East Region Land Conservation and Smallholder Rehabilitation Project (LACOSREP) – Phase II Interim Evaluation May 2006 Report No. 1757-GH Photo on cover page: Republic of Ghana Members of a Functional Literacy Group at Katia (Upper East Region) IFAD Photo by: R. Blench, OE Consultant Republic of Ghana Upper East Region Land Conservation and Smallholder Rehabilitation Project (LACOSREP) – Phase II, Loan No. 503-GH Interim Evaluation Table of Contents Currency and Exchange Rates iii Abbreviations and Acronyms iii Map v Agreement at Completion Point vii Executive Summary xv I. INTRODUCTION 1 A. Background of Evaluation 1 B. Approach and Methodology 4 II. MAIN DESIGN FEATURES 4 A. Project Rationale and Strategy 4 B. Project Area and Target Group 5 C. Goals, Objectives and Components 6 D. Major Changes in Policy, Environmental and Institutional Context during 7 Implementation III. SUMMARY OF IMPLEMENTATION RESULTS 9 A. Promotion of Income-Generating Activities 9 B. Dams, Irrigation, Water and Roads 10 C. Agricultural Extension 10 D. Environment 12 IV. PERFORMANCE OF THE PROJECT 12 A. Relevance of Objectives 12 B. Effectiveness 12 C. Efficiency 14 V. RURAL POVERTY IMPACT 16 A. Impact on Physical and Financial Assets 16 B. Impact on Human Assets 18 C. Social Capital and Empowerment 19 D. Impact on Food Security 20 E. Environmental Impact 21 F. Impact on Institutions and Policies 22 G. Impacts on Gender 22 H. Sustainability 23 I. Innovation, Scaling up and Replicability 24 J. Overall Impact Assessment 25 VI. PERFORMANCE OF PARTNERS 25 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture and Economic Growth in Republic of Ghana
    DOI: 10.29050/harranziraat.421660 Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Derg. 2018, 22(3): 363-375 Research Article/Araştırma Makalesi Agriculture and economic growth in Republic of Ghana Gana Cumhuriyeti’nde tarım ve ekonomik büyüme Edwin OKİNE1 , Remziye ÖZEL2* 1 H/F1103rd Lane.Oxford Street Osu, Post office box os2089, Osu Accra, GHANA 2Harran Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Tarım Ekonomisi Bölümü, Şanlıurfa-TURKEY ABSTRACT To cite this article: Okine, E. & Özel, R. (2018). The main objective of this work was to examine the contributions of the Agriculture and economic agricultural, service and industrial sectors to economic growth in Ghana, and to growth in Republic of show the distribution and changes in growth rates by year and the current Ghana. Harran Tarım ve performces of the sectors. Time series data from 1984-2013 on all the variables of Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, 22(3): interest obtained from various organizations was used for the analysis. The 363-375. DOI: Ordinary Least Squares estimation technique was used for the analysis. The results 10.29050/harranziraat.4216 show that a 1% increase in the growth of the agricultural sector will cause GDP 60 growth to increase by 0.248%. Also, a 1% increase in the growth of the services sector will lead to 0.472% increase in GDP growth. Finally, 1% increase in the growth of the industrial sector will bring 0.32% increase in GDP growth. It is concluded that the service sector contributed most to the overall growth. It is recommended that for Ghana to achieve higher GDP growth rate, she should Address for Correspondence: activate / strengthen the agricultural sector as well as its services.
    [Show full text]
  • Ghana: an Agricultural Exception in West Africa?
    78 GRAIN DE SEL Inter-Réseaux Développement Rural Magazine • July-December 2019 Ghana: an agricultural exception in West Africa? > A thriving democracy > An El Dorado for agribusiness? > Leading export sectors CONTENTS No. 78 Editorial 3 Markers: Ghana and Ivory Coast: false twins? 4-5 LEAD-IN Ghana: a political and agricultural history 6-7 Ghana’s Agricultural and Economic Transformation: Past Performance and Future Prospects 8-9 How the Ghanaian cedi brought my company to its knees 10 Outlook for Ghana Beyond Aid 11 IssueS Driving regional integration: can Ghana overcome the Nigerian hurdle? 12-13 Land Use Planning and Agricultural Development in Rural Ghana 14 Ghana: pioneering “smart” input subsidy programmes 15-16 Ghana’s input subsidy programs: Awaiting the verdict 17 Agroecology in Ghana, the sesame sector as an opportunity 18 ICTs sector: a driver for rural and agricultural development in Ghana? 19-20 Peasant organisations in Ghana: major players of sustainable development 21-22 Stories from Northern Ghana: women in agri-food processing 23-24 SupplY CHAINS Ghana and Ivory Coast: long-term alliance to support cocoa growers? 25 The nexus between cocoa production and deforestation 26-27 When a firm, farmers and a bank join forces in the rubber sector 28-29 Rice: the challenge of self-sufficiency 30-31 Guinness Ghana’s role in structuring the sorghum sector 32-33 Cotton: Ghana’s subpar performance 34-35 The scourge of saiko: illegal fishing in Ghana 36-37 What’s next for tilapia farming in Ghana? 38-39 CONCLUSION Cross perspective: is Ghana a model or counter-model for West Africa? 40-42 Members’ corner 43 Portrait: Gladys Adusah Serwaa: rural women as agriculture workforce 44 GRAIN DE SEL The opinions expressed in the articles do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Inter-Réseaux.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysing Trends in Agricultural Output in Ghana 1995
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Ashesi Institutional Repository ASHESI UNIVERSITY COLLEGE ANALYSING TRENDS IN AGRICULTURAL OUTPUT IN GHANA 1995- 2015: UNDERLYING CAUSES AND OPTIONS FOR SUSTAINABLE GROWTH B. SC. BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION PRINCE KENNEDY KWARASE This is an undergraduate thesis submitted to the Department of Business Administration, Ashesi University College in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration. May 2017 ANALSYING TRENDS IN AGRICULTURAL OUTPUT i DECLARATION I hereby declare that this dissertation is the result my own original work and that no part of it has been presented for another degree in this University or elsewhere. Candidate’s Signature: ……………………. Candidate’s Name: Prince Kennedy Kwarase Date: May 2, 2017 I hereby declare that the preparation and preparation of the dissertation were supervised in accordance with the guidelines on the supervision of dissertation laid down by Ashesi University College. Supervisor’s Signature: …………………………… Supervisor’s Name: Dr. Emmanuel Stephen Armah Date: May 2, 2017 ANALSYING TRENDS IN AGRICULTURAL OUTPUT ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Borrowing the words of King David in Psalm 121, I declare that the Lord is my keeper and shade, he neither slumber nor sleeps as far as my life is concerned. My utmost gratitude goes to the origin of my life - God Almighty for seeing me through this stage of my life. He has been faithful to me in all my endeavours and I pray to live out my purpose before I return to Him. Secondly, I want to thank my supervisor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture Sector in Ghana Review Review
    Agriculture Sector in Ghana Review 10/5/2020 Review Review FOREIGN TRADE ADMINISTRATION – YOUR CONNECTION TO ISRAELI INNOVATION Israel’s Trade and Economic mission to Ghana Embassy of Israel, Mannet tower, Airport city, Accra, Ghana | Tel: +233-302743838, Email: [email protected] General Figures Agriculture contributes 19.7% of Ghana’s current GDP, accounts for over 30% of export earnings and serves as a major source of inputs to our manufacturing industry. In 2019, 33.5% of labor force in Ghana was absorbed by the agriculture sector. Agriculture is the second largest employer in the economy but the smallest sector in comparison to services and industry. The agriculture sector grew from 2.9% in 2016 to 6.1% in 2017, recorded a growth of 4.8 in 2018 and it is projected to grow at 6.9% in 2019. The agriculture value added that is the net output of the sector from 2018 is 11.98 billion USD. As so, agriculture is viewed by many as a key factor in Ghana’s economic growth and development process. Ghana has a total land area of 238,539 km2 of which 57% of it representing about 136,000 km2 is classified as "agricultural land area" out of which 58,000 km2 (24.4 %) is under cultivation and 11,000 hectares under irrigation. The agriculture sector in Ghana is very informal hence; there is no high quality official data available. Ghana’s agriculture is predominately smallholder farmers (80%), traditional and rain fed. Agriculture sector is usually divided into 4 subsectors, which are crops (including cocoa), livestock, forestry and logging & fishing.
    [Show full text]