Cervical Spondylosis, Stenosis, and Rheumatoid Arthritis
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
An Audit of Bone Mineral Density and Associated Factors in Patients With
Review Article Clinician’s corner Images in Medicine Experimental Research Case Report Miscellaneous Letter to Editor DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2019/39690.12544 Original Article Postgraduate Education An Audit of Bone Mineral Density and Case Series Associated Factors in Patients with Orthopaedics Section Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Short Communication ARASH RAHBAR1, RAHMATOLLAH JOKAR2, SEYED MOKHTAR ESMAEILNEJAD-GANJI3 ABSTRACT Results: Overall, 146 patients with lumbar stenosis were Introduction: Osteoporosis is a major global health problem enrolled. Based on bone densitometry of spine and femur, and is commonly observed with lumbar stenosis in older 35 (24%) and 36 (24.7%) of the patients had osteoporosis. people. It is stated that osteoporosis may cause progressive According to femoral densitometry, age (OR=1.311, 95% CI: spinal deformities and stenosis in elderly patients. 1.167-1.473), being a female (OR=3.391, 95% CI: 1.391-8.420) and being a homemaker (OR=3.675, 95% CI: 1.476-9.146) Aim: To audit prevalence of low bone mineral density and were found as risk factors for osteoporosis. Based on spinal associated factors in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. densitometry, age (OR=1.283, 95% CI: 1.154-1.427) and being Materials and Methods: Patients with symptomatic lumbar a female (OR=2.786, 95% CI: 1.106-7.019) were associated with spinal stenosis were recruited in this cross-sectional study, osteoporosis. Significant correlations were observed between who had been referred to Shahid Beheshti hospital in Babol, bone mineral density and red blood cell counts (r=+0.168, Northern Iran, between 2016 and 2017. -
Nonoperative Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication a Systematic Review
SPINE Volume 37, Number 10, pp E609–E616 ©2012, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins LITERATURE REVIEW Nonoperative Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Neurogenic Claudication A Systematic Review Carlo Ammendolia , DC, PhD, *†‡ Kent Stuber, DC, MSc , § Linda K. de Bruin , MSc , ‡ Andrea D. Furlan, MD, PhD , ||‡¶ Carol A. Kennedy, BScPT, MSc , ‡#** Yoga Raja Rampersaud, MD , †† Ivan A. Steenstra , PhD , ‡ and Victoria Pennick, RN, BScN, MHSc ‡‡ or methylcobalamin, improve walking distance. There is very low- Study Design. Systematic review. quality evidence from a single trial that epidural steroid injections Objective. To systematically review the evidence for the improve pain, function, and quality of life up to 2 weeks compared effectiveness of nonoperative treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with home exercise or inpatient physical therapy. There is low- with neurogenic claudication. quality evidence from a single trial that exercise is of short-term Summary of Background Data. Neurogenic claudication benefi t for leg pain and function compared with no treatment. There can signifi cantly impact functional ability, quality of life, and is low- and very low-quality evidence from 6 trials that multimodal independence in the elderly. nonoperative treatment is less effective than indirect or direct Methods. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, surgical decompression with or without fusion. and ICL databases up to January 2011 for randomized controlled Conclusion. Moderate- and high-GRADE evidence for nonopera- trials published in English, in which at least 1 arm provided tive treatment is lacking and thus prohibiting recommendations to data on nonoperative treatments. Risk of bias in each study was guide clinical practice. Given the expected exponential rise in the independently assessed by 2 reviewers using 12 criteria. -
Double Spinal Cord Injury in a Patient with Ankylosing Spondylitis
Spinal Cord (1999) 37, 305 ± 307 ã 1999 International Medical Society of Paraplegia All rights reserved 1362 ± 4393/99 $12.00 http://www.stockton-press.co.uk/sc Case Report Double spinal cord injury in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis MN Akman*,1 M KaratasÎ1, SÎ KilincË 1 and M AgÏ ildere1 1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Radiology, BahcË elievler, Ankara, Turkey Ankylosing spondylitis patients are more prone to spinal fractures and these fractures commonly result in mobile nonunion. We report a patient with a 30-year history of ankylosing spondylitis who sustained double spinal cord injuries following minor trauma. The ®rst injury occurred at the lumbar level due to pseudoarthrosis of an old fracture, and the second at the thoracic level following cardiopulmonary arrest and an episode of hypotension. The possible mechanisms of the injuries are discussed and maintaining normal blood pressure in these patients is emphasized. Keywords: spinal cord injury; ankylosing spondylitis; spinal cord infarction; spinal fractures Introduction Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has a prevalance of 1 per diagnostic workup. His arterial blood pressure stayed 1000 in the general population and primarily involves below normal and his central venous pressure remained 1 the vertebral column. Spinal rigidity due to long- below 5 cmH2O for about 12 h. ECG, chest X-Ray standing AS renders the patient susceptible to vertebral and cranial computed tomography (CT) were normal. trauma, so that even minor trauma may cause When the patient awoke and was in a stable condition, fractures.2±9 There are only a few reports in the he could not feel or move his legs. -
Self-Help for Spinal Stenosis Information for Patients
Self-help for Spinal Stenosis Information for patients What is spinal stenosis? Spinal stenosis is a common condition affecting the lower back. It affects people over the age of 60 years. Spinal stenosis can result in symptoms including back pain, buttock pain and leg pain. Other symptoms include pins and needles, numbness and sometimes weakness in the legs or feet. If you have spinal stenosis you will likely experience a combination of these symptoms. What causes spinal stenosis? The spinal cord runs through a tunnel made from the bones in your back called vertebrae. This is because the bones are strong and act to protect the spinal cord. The nerves then branch out from the spinal cord and pass through smaller tunnels at the side of your spine. Sometimes the aging process leads to narrowing in parts of the lower back. This usually occurs gradually over time. The nerves and spinal cord may become tightened or squeezed as a result of this narrowing. Stenosis is the medical term for narrowing. Narrowing in the spine is very common but not everyone who has it will develop symptoms. Spinal stenosis can also occur at different levels in the spine. It is possible to get similar symptoms in your legs and feet that are not caused by spinal stenosis. Will spinal stenosis get better? It is not possible to reverse any age-related changes in the back; however it is possible to manage and improve your symptoms. Many people will experience “flare-ups” so it is important that you are confident in ways to manage your symptoms. -
The Characteristics of Osteophyte Around Lumbar Vertebral Foramina Associated with Spinal Stenosis
Original Article https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.2019.52.2.143 pISSN 2093-3665 eISSN 2093-3673 The characteristics of osteophyte around lumbar vertebral foramina associated with spinal stenosis Thawanthorn Chaimongkhol1, Atiphoom Thiamkaew1, Pasuk Mahakkanukrauh2,3,4 1Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 2Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 3Forensic Osteology Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 4Excellence Center in Osteology Research and Training Center (ORTC), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand Abstract: Spinal stenosis most commonly occurs on lumbar vertebrae because of degenerative changes. This research studied the characteristics of osteophyte development in lumbar vertebrae foramina and association of osteophyte development with lumbar spinal stenosis. The total number of all levels of lumbar spines of subjects was 179 from 31 to 90 years of age. The vertebral foramen was divided into six zones. The prevalence and measurements of the length of osteophytes in the vertebral foramina were obtained. The prevalence and length of osteophytes in the posterior body zone were higher than the laminal zone, and higher than the pedicular zone, respectively. In each zone, the highest prevalence of osteophytes was at L5, except for the inferior posterior body zone that the highest prevalence is at L4. The length of osteophyte was also in same direction as the prevalence. The prevalence of osteophytes among six zones of each level were compared, and found, in L1 to L4, the inferior posterior body zone generally had the highest prevalence, except in L5, the superior posterior body zone had the highest prevalence. -
Coblation Versus Traditional Tonsillectomy
Global Journal of Otolaryngology ISSN 2474-7556 Case Report Glob J Otolaryngol Volume 6 Issue 4 - April 2017 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Cristina. Otilia Laza DOI: 10.19080/GJO.2017.06.555695 Dysphagia in Forestier Syndrome Cristina Otilia Laza* and Mostafa Sarv ENT Clinic SCJU, SF APOSTOL ANDREI ‘’, Constanta, Romania Submission: April 06, 2017; Published: April 17, 2017 *Corresponding author: Cristina. Otilia Laza, Professor associate PhD –ENT -head and neck surgery, ENT/OMF Clinic, SCJU SF “APOSTOL ANDREI “ Constanta, B-dul Tomis, 145,8700, Constanta, Romania, Email: Abstract Dysphagia is a frequent complaint in elderly patients. At this age, neurological and tumoral causes predominates. Diffuse idiopathic spine.skeletal Most hyperostosis patients are (DISH), free ofalso symptoms, known as so Forestier that DISH disease is usually , first discovered described fortuitouslyin1950 by J. uponForestier, plain is radiographs a rare cause of of the dysphagia spine obtained ,caused forby large calcification along the anterior and lateral sides of the vertebral bodies, produces the appearance of candle wax dripping down the evaluation for dysphagia in an old patient. The diagnosis requires imaging but also other causes especially tumors must be excluded. another reason. A few patients experience spinal pain, spinal stiffness, or dysphagia. We report a case in which the diagnosis was made upon Keywords: Dysphagia; Retropharyngeal; Prevertebral space; Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH); Forestier syndrome Case Report A 69-year-old man with was referred to our Laboratory Tests dl) with a normal ferritin level. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate otorhinolaryngology clinic for difficulties in swallowing solid His full blood count showed a normocytic anaemia (9.32 g/ he was capable to swallow very soft pureed foods or liquids. -
Managing Spinal Conditions in Older Persons
JAMES ZUCHERMAN, MD JUDY SILVERMAN, MD Considering the patienfs overall medical status is crucial Managing spinal conditions in older persons ABSTRACT: Older patients who present with spinal complaints do not need to accept pain and diminished functional capacity as conse quences ofaging. Spinal stenosis results from the natural progression ofdegenerative changes in the spine. Thoracolumbar compression fractures usually are caused by trauma but also are common in pa tients who have osteoporosis. Mobility testing can help identif]^ un derlying pathology and deinse an exercise program. It is important to screenfor other causes ofpain, such as hip pathology. Radiography, MRI, and CTare useful imaging studies. The presence ofcauda equina syndrome requires urgent imaging and, usually, surgery. In This is the seventh in a special se some cases, a short course ofphysical therapy can reverse symptoms. ries ofarticles on the evaluation Lumbar or thoracic osteoporoticfracture treatmentfocuses on and management ofback pain. symptom management. (J Musculoskel Med. 2005;22:214-222) The percentage of the US popula the most common severe condi healthful living habits. Judicious ' tion older than 65 years has been tions in older persons. Consider use of exercise, proper body me increasing during the past centu ing a patient's overall medical sta chanics, medications, and surgery , ry and is peaking as baby boomers tus is crucial in management of can result in improvement in func- ; reach older age, Many older per these problems, because comor- tion and quality of Hfe. In this ar- | sons have aches, pains, and dimin bidities can affect treatment op tide, we describe the diagnosis ished functional capacity but do tions and outcomes. -
Osteophyte and Enthesophyte Formation Are Positively Associated
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 1997;56:85–90 85 Ann Rheum Dis: first published as 10.1136/ard.56.2.85 on 1 February 1997. Downloaded from EXTENDED REPORTS Bone formers: osteophyte and enthesophyte formation are positively associated Juliet Rogers, Lee Shepstone, Paul Dieppe Abstract phenomenon, unrelated to any joint disease.4 Objective—To test the hypothesis that New bone can form at individual entheses in enthesophyte formation and osteophyte response to a seronegative spondarthritis.5 growth are positively associated and to More commonly, they are seen in several sites look for associations between bone forma- as part of the condition first described in the tion at diVerent sites on the skeleton so spine by Forrestier and Rotes-Querol6 and now that a simple measure of bone formation known as diVuse idiopathic skeletal hyperost- could be derived. osis (DISH).7 Methods—Visual examination of 337 adult The presence of periarticular osteophytes skeletons. All common sites of either has been noted by Resnick and Niwayama in enthesophyte or osteophyte formation DISH1 but the relation of enthesophyte and were inspected by a single observer who marginal osteophytosis in this condition has graded bone formation at these sites on a not been specifically investigated. This study 0-3 scale. The total score for each feature tests the hypothesis that some individuals have was divided by the number of sites exam- a greater tendency to form bone at both joint ined to derive an enthesophyte and an margins and entheses than others. The osteophyte score. Cronbach’s á and hypothesis has been derived from the observa- principal components analysis were used tion in skeletal studies of striking osteophyte to identify groupings. -
Facet Arthropathy Evaluation: CT Or MRI?
European Radiology (2019) 29:4990–4998 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06047-5 MUSCULOSKELETAL Facet arthropathy evaluation: CT or MRI? Linda Berg1,2 & Hanne Thoresen1 & Gesche Neckelmann3 & Håvard Furunes4,5,6 & Christian Hellum 7 & Ansgar Espeland3,8 Received: 29 August 2018 /Revised: 31 December 2018 /Accepted: 25 January 2019 /Published online: 22 February 2019 # European Society of Radiology 2019 Abstract Objective To assess the reliability of lumbar facet arthropathy evaluation with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic reso- nance imaging (MRI) in patients with and without lumbar disc prosthesis and to estimate the reliability for individual CT and MRI findings indicating facet arthropathy. Methods Metal-artifact reducing CT and MRI protocols were performed at follow-up of 114 chronic back pain patients treated with (n = 66) or without (n = 48) lumbar disc prosthesis. Three experienced radiologists independently rated facet joint space narrowing, osteophyte/hypertrophy, erosions, subchondral cysts, and total grade facet arthropathy at each of the three lower lumbar levels on both CT and MRI, using Weishaupt et al’s rating system. CT and MRI examinations were randomly mixed and rated independently. Findings were dichotomized before analysis. Overall kappa and (due to low prevalence) prevalence- and bias-adjusted kappa were calculated to assess interobserver agreement. Results Interobserver agreement on total grade facet arthropathy was moderate at all levels with CT (kappa 0.47–0.48) and poor to fair with MRI (kappa 0.20–0.32). Mean prevalence- and bias-adjusted kappa was lower for osteophyte/hypertrophy versus other individual findings (CT 0.58 versus 0.79–0.86, MRI 0.35 versus 0.81–0.90), higher with CT versus MRI when rating osteophyte/hypertrophy (0.58 versus 0.35) and total grade facet arthropathy (0.54 versus 0.31), and generally similar at levels with versus levels without disc prosthesis. -
Characterisation of Size and Direction of Osteophyte in Knee Osteoarthritis: a Radiographic Study Y Nagaosa, P Lanyon, M Doherty
319 EXTENDED REPORT Ann Rheum Dis: first published as 10.1136/ard.61.4.319 on 1 April 2002. Downloaded from Characterisation of size and direction of osteophyte in knee osteoarthritis: a radiographic study Y Nagaosa, P Lanyon, M Doherty ............................................................................................................................. Ann Rheum Dis 2002;61:319–324 Objectives: To examine the size and direction of osteophyte in knee osteoarthritis (OA) and to deter- mine associations between osteophyte size and other radiographic features. Methods: Knee radiographs (standing extended anteroposterior and 30 degrees flexion skyline views) were examined from 204 patients referred to hospital with symptomatic knee OA (155 women, 49 men; mean age 70, range 34–91 years). A single observer assessed films for osteophyte size and direction at eight sites; narrowing in each compartment; varus/valgus angulation; patellofemoral sub- luxation; attrition; and chondrocalcinosis using a standard atlas, direct measurement, or visual assess- ment. For analysis, one OA knee was selected at random from each subject. Results: Osteophyte direction at the eight sites was divisible into five categories. At all sites, except for See end of article for the lateral tibial plateau and the medial patella, osteophyte direction varied according to (a) the size authors’ affiliations of osteophyte and (b) the degree of local narrowing. At the medial femur, medial tibia, and lateral ....................... femur osteophyte direction changed from being predominantly horizontal to predominantly vertical Correspondence to: with increasing size. The size of osteophyte correlated positively with the severity of local narrowing, Professor M Doherty, except for the medial patellofemoral compartment where osteophyte size correlated positively with the Academic Rheumatology, severity of narrowing in the medial tibiofemoral compartment. -
Diagnosis and Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation with Radiculopathy
Y Lumbar Disc Herniation with Radiculopathy | NASS Clinical Guidelines 1 G Evidence-Based Clinical Guidelines for Multidisciplinary ETHODOLO Spine Care M NE I DEL I U /G ON Diagnosis and Treatment of I NTRODUCT Lumbar Disc I Herniation with Radiculopathy NASS Evidence-Based Clinical Guidelines Committee D. Scott Kreiner, MD Paul Dougherty, II, DC Committee Chair, Natural History Chair Robert Fernand, MD Gary Ghiselli, MD Steven Hwang, MD Amgad S. Hanna, MD Diagnosis/Imaging Chair Tim Lamer, MD Anthony J. Lisi, DC John Easa, MD Daniel J. Mazanec, MD Medical/Interventional Treatment Chair Richard J. Meagher, MD Robert C. Nucci, MD Daniel K .Resnick, MD Rakesh D. Patel, MD Surgical Treatment Chair Jonathan N. Sembrano, MD Anil K. Sharma, MD Jamie Baisden, MD Jeffrey T. Summers, MD Shay Bess, MD Christopher K. Taleghani, MD Charles H. Cho, MD, MBA William L. Tontz, Jr., MD Michael J. DePalma, MD John F. Toton, MD This clinical guideline should not be construed as including all proper methods of care or excluding or other acceptable methods of care reason- ably directed to obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment regarding any specific procedure or treatment is to be made by the physi- cian and patient in light of all circumstances presented by the patient and the needs and resources particular to the locality or institution. I NTRODUCT 2 Lumbar Disc Herniation with Radiculopathy | NASS Clinical Guidelines I ON Financial Statement This clinical guideline was developed and funded in its entirety by the North American Spine Society (NASS). All participating /G authors have disclosed potential conflicts of interest consistent with NASS’ disclosure policy. -
Magnitude Degenerative Lumbar Curves: Natural History and Literature Review
An Original Study Risk of Progression in De Novo Low- Magnitude Degenerative Lumbar Curves: Natural History and Literature Review Kingsley R. Chin, MD, Christopher Furey, MD, and Henry H. Bohlman, MD disabling pain and progressive deformity, surgery might be Abstract needed to relieve symptoms.1,3,8,9,12,14,15,19-23,27,30 However, Natural history studies have focused on risk for progres- the decision to perform surgery is often complicated by sion in lumbar curves of more than 30°, while smaller advanced age and variable life expectancy, osteoporosis, and curves have little data for guiding treatment. We studied multiple medical comorbidities that commonly characterize curve progression in de novo degenerative scoliotic this patient population. Complications after surgery range curves of no more than 30°. from 20% to 40% in most series.1,3,8,9,12,14,15,19,21,23,27,30 Radiographs of 24 patients (17 women, 7 men; mean age, 68.2 years) followed for up to 14.3 years (mean, There is lack of consensus for surgical management 4.85 years) were reviewed. Risk factors studied for curve of lumbar degenerative scoliosis because of the hetero- progression included lumbar lordosis, lateral listhesis of geneous nature of the disorder and the afflicted patient more than 5 mm, sex, age, convexity direction, and posi- population, the multiple surgical options, and the lack tion of intercrestal line. Curves averaged 14° at presentation and 22° at latest follow-up and progressed a mean of 2° (SD, 1°) per year. Mean progression was 2.5° per year for patients older “Natural history studies than 69 years and 1.5° per year for younger patients.