Environmental Scoping Report: Seafield Kleinemonde Eco-Estate DRAFT Coastal & Environmental Services

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Scoping Report: Seafield Kleinemonde Eco-Estate DRAFT Coastal & Environmental Services Coastal & Environmental Services THE PROPOSED ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ‘ECO- ESTATE’ DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO THE EAST KLEINEMONDE RIVER, EASTERN CAPE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL SCOPING REPORT Prepared by Coastal & Environmental Services P.O. Box 934 Grahamstown 6140 On behalf of Mr R Taylor Prepared for Approval by Department of Economic Affairs, Environment and Tourism Private Bag X5001 Greenacres Port Elizabeth 6057 25 October 2006 Environmental Scoping Report: Seafield Kleinemonde Eco-Estate DRAFT Coastal & Environmental Services TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 LIMITATIONS & ASSUMPTIONS........................................................................................................ 5 1.1.1 Limiting conditions ........................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 STUDY AREA, STUDY SITE AND STUDY TEAM .............................................................................. 6 1.3 GENERAL METHODOLOGY AND APPROACH ................................................................................ 6 2 THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) PROCESS ........................................................... 7 2.1 TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL SCOPING STUDY .................................... 7 2.1.1 Role of the Environmental Consultant or Environmental assessment Practitioner .......................... 8 2.1.2 Consultation in the scoping study .................................................................................................... 8 2.1.3 Objectives oF scoping ..................................................................................................................... 8 2.1.4 Public and authority consultation in the scoping phase ................................................................... 8 3 RELEVANT ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION .........................................................................................10 3.1 CO-OPERATIVE GOVERNANCE (CONSTITUTION ACT 108 0F 1996) ...........................................10 3.2 ENVIRONMENT CONSERVATION ACT (ACT 73 OF 1989) ..............................................................10 3.3 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT ACT (NO 107 OF 1998) (NEMA) ...............................10 3.4 NATIONAL FORESTS ACT (NO 84 OF 1998) (NFA) .........................................................................11 3.5 EASTERN CAPE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION BILL, 2003................................................11 3.6 BIODIVERSITY ACT (NO 10 OF 2004) ..............................................................................................11 3.7 NATIONAL WATER ACT (NO 36 OF 1998) (NWA) ............................................................................12 3.7.1 General Authorisations in terms of Section 39 of the National Water Act.......................................12 3.8 NATIONAL HERITAGE RESOURCES ACT 25 OF 1999...................................................................12 3.9 LAND USE PLANNING ORDINANCE (15 OF 1985) AND NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL ACT (70 OF 1970) ............................................................................................................................................................13 3.10 WHITE PAPER FOR SUSTAINABLE COASTAL DEVELOPMENT IN SOUTH AFRICA..................13 3.11 ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................14 4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION............................................................................................................................15 4.1 BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................................................15 4.2 LOCATION..........................................................................................................................................15 4.3 EXISTING LAND USE RIGHTS..........................................................................................................15 4.4 PROPOSED LAYOUT, ACTIVITIES & FACILITIES...........................................................................16 4.5 TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT ..............................................................................................................18 4.5.1 Road Access...................................................................................................................................18 4.5.2 Storm water ....................................................................................................................................18 4.5.3 Water supply...................................................................................................................................18 4.5.4 Sewage...........................................................................................................................................18 4.5.5 Electricity supply.............................................................................................................................18 4.5.6 Solid waste .....................................................................................................................................18 5 WATER SUPPLY & REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................................................19 5.1 GROUND WATER ASSESSMENT.....................................................................................................19 5.1.1 Borehole yields ...............................................................................................................................19 5.2 SUPPLY BY GROUNDWATER ..........................................................................................................19 5.2.1 Weltevrede Aquifer .........................................................................................................................20 5.2.2 Witpoort Aquifer ..............................................................................................................................20 5.2.3 Coastal Aquifers .............................................................................................................................20 5.3 SUPPLY BY SURFACE WATER........................................................................................................20 5.3.1 Mount Wellington Dam ...................................................................................................................20 5.3.2 The Grove Dam ..............................................................................................................................20 5.3.3 Kwasandile Dam (Amathole Water)................................................................................................21 5.3.4 Summary of potentail sources of water...........................................................................................21 Environmental Scoping Report: Proposed Seafield Kleinemonde Eco-Estate 2 DRAFT Coastal & Environmental Services 6 THE STUDY AREA: A REGIONAL CONTEXT............................................................................................22 6.1 BIO-PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA ...................................................................22 6.1.1 Topography & drainage ..................................................................................................................22 6.1.2 Climate ...........................................................................................................................................22 6.1.3 Geology and soils ...........................................................................................................................22 6.1.4 Hydrology: Ground and surface water ............................................................................................22 6.1.5 Vegetation ......................................................................................................................................24 6.1.6 Fauna .............................................................................................................................................30 6.1.7 The coastal environment ................................................................................................................30 6.1.8 Protected areas and rare & endemic species .................................................................................30 6.1.9 Land degradation............................................................................................................................31 6.1.10 Atmosphere and climate issues .................................................................................................32 6.2 SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT.................................................................................................33 6.2.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................33 6.2.2 Development constraints ................................................................................................................33 6.2.3 Land Use Pattern: built environment...............................................................................................33 6.2.4 Demographic Profile .......................................................................................................................33
Recommended publications
  • Chemical Element Concentrations of Cycad Leaves: Do We Know Enough?
    horticulturae Review Chemical Element Concentrations of Cycad Leaves: Do We Know Enough? Benjamin E. Deloso 1 , Murukesan V. Krishnapillai 2 , Ulysses F. Ferreras 3, Anders J. Lindström 4, Michael Calonje 5 and Thomas E. Marler 6,* 1 College of Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Guam, Mangilao, GU 96923, USA; [email protected] 2 Cooperative Research and Extension, Yap Campus, College of Micronesia-FSM, Colonia, Yap 96943, Micronesia; [email protected] 3 Philippine Native Plants Conservation Society Inc., Ninoy Aquino Parks and Wildlife Center, Quezon City 1101, Philippines; [email protected] 4 Plant Collections Department, Nong Nooch Tropical Botanical Garden, 34/1 Sukhumvit Highway, Najomtien, Sattahip, Chonburi 20250, Thailand; [email protected] 5 Montgomery Botanical Center, 11901 Old Cutler Road, Coral Gables, FL 33156, USA; [email protected] 6 Western Pacific Tropical Research Center, University of Guam, Mangilao, GU 96923, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 13 October 2020; Accepted: 16 November 2020; Published: 19 November 2020 Abstract: The literature containing which chemical elements are found in cycad leaves was reviewed to determine the range in values of concentrations reported for essential and beneficial elements. We found 46 of the 358 described cycad species had at least one element reported to date. The only genus that was missing from the data was Microcycas. Many of the species reports contained concentrations of one to several macronutrients and no other elements. The cycad leaves contained greater nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations than the reported means for plants throughout the world. Magnesium was identified as the macronutrient that has been least studied.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Trends of Seabirds Breeding in South Africa's Eastern Cape and the Possible Influence of Anthropogenic and Environ
    Crawford et al.: Population trends of seabirds breeding in South Africa 159 POPULATION TRENDS OF SEABIRDS BREEDING IN SOUTH AFRICA’S EASTERN CAPE AND THE POSSIBLE INFLUENCE OF ANTHROPOGENIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE ROBERT J.M. CRAWFORD,1,2 PHILIP A. WHITTINGTON,3,4 A. PAUL MARTIN,5 ANTHONY J. TREE4,6 & AZWIANEWI B. MAKHADO1 1Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, Marine and Coastal Management, Private Bag X2, Rogge Bay, 8012, South Africa ([email protected]) 2Animal Demography Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7701, South Africa 3East London Museum, PO Box 11021, Southernwood, 5213, South Africa 4Department of Zoology, PO Box 77000, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, 6031, South Africa 5PO Box 61029, Bluewater Bay, 6212, South Africa 6PO Box 211, Bathurst, 6166, South Africa Received 28 August 2008, accepted 4 April 2009 SUMMARY CRAWFORD, R.J.M., WHITTINGTON, P.A., MARTIN, A.P., TREE, A.J. & MAKHADO, A.B. 2009. Population trends of seabirds breeding in South Africa’s Eastern Cape and the possible influence of anthropogenic and environmental change. Marine Ornithology 37: 159–174. Eleven species of seabird breed in South Africa’s Eastern Cape Province. Numbers of African Penguin Spheniscus demersus and Cape Gannet Morus capensis in the province increased in the 20th century, but penguins decreased in the early 21st century. A recent eastward displacement of Sardine Sardinops sagax off South Africa increased the availability of this food source to gannets but did not benefit penguins, which have a shorter foraging range. Fishing and harbour developments may have influenced the recent decrease of penguins.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the PDF File
    ISSN 2473-442X CONTENTS Message from Dr. Patrick Griffith, Co-chair, IUCN/SSC CSG 3 Official newsletter of IUCN/SSC Cycad Specialist Group Botanic Garden: In Focus Vol. IV I Issue 2 I December 2019 Montgomery Botanical Center’s Cycad Collection – Focus on research and conservation 5 Michael Calonje & Patrick Griffith Feature Articles Towards an approach for the conservation and illegal trade prevention of South Africa’s endangered Encephalartos spp. 10 James A. R. Clugston, Michelle Van Der Bankand Ronny M. Kobongo Fire is the most important threat for conservation of Dioon merolae (espadaña) in the hill Nambiyigua, municipality of Villaflores, Chiapas, Mexico 13 Miguel Angel Pérez-Farrera & Mauricio Martínez Martínez Ex-situ Cycad Conservation [1]: Public and Private Collections 16 Chip Jones & JS Khuraijam The Cycad Specialist Group (CSG) is a component of the IUCN Species Research and Conservation News Survival Commission (IUCN/SSC). It consists of a group of volunteer The Cycad Extinction Crisis in South Africa 19 experts addressing conservation Wynand van Eeden & Tim Gregory issues related to cycads, a highly What is Ceratozamia becerrae ? 21 threatened group of land plants. The Andrew P. Vovides, Miguel Angel Pérez-Farrera & José Said Gutiérrez-Ortega CSG exists to bring together the world’s cycad conservation expertise, Preliminary Finding: Seed longevity of Encephalartos in controlled storage 23 and to disseminate this expertise to Ngawethu Ngaka and Phakamani Xaba organizations and agencies which can use this guidance to advance cycad Meeting Reports conservation. 2nd Nong Nooch Cycad Horticulture Workshop 25 Official website of CSG: Anders Lindstrom http://www.cycadgroup.org/ Plant Conservation Genetics Workshop 26 Co-Chairs Caroline Iacuaniello, Stephanie Steele & Christy Powell John Donaldson Patrick Griffith CSG Members 28 Vice Chairs Michael Calonje Cristina Lopez-Gallego Red List Authority Coordinator De Wet Bosenberg CSG Newsletter Committee JS Khuraijam, Editor Irene Terry Andrew P.
    [Show full text]
  • Cycad Forensics: Tracing the Origin of Poached Cycads Using Stable Isotopes, Trace Element Concentrations and Radiocarbon Dating Techniques
    Cycad forensics: Tracing the origin of poached cycads using stable isotopes, trace element concentrations and radiocarbon dating techniques by Kirsten Retief Supervisors: Dr Adam West (UCT) and Ms Michele Pfab (SANBI) Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in Conservation Biology 5 June 2013 Percy FitzPatrick Institution of African Ornithology, UniversityDepartment of Biologicalof Cape Sciences Town University of Cape Town, Rondebosch Cape Town South Africa 7701 i The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town Table of Contents Acknowledgements iii Plagiarism declaration iv Abstract v Chapter 1: Status of cycads and background to developing a forensic technique 1 1. Why are cycads threatened? 2 2. Importance of cycads 4 3. Current conservation strategies 5 4. Stable isotopes in forensic science 7 5. Trace element concentrations 15 6. Principles for using isotopes as a tracer 15 7. Radiocarbon dating 16 8. Cycad life history, anatomy and age of tissues 18 9. Recapitulation 22 Chapter 2: Applying stable isotope and radiocarbon dating techniques to cycads 23 1. Introduction 24 2. Methods 26 2.1 Sampling selection and sites 26 2.2 Sampling techniques 30 2.3 Processing samples 35 2.4 Cellulose extraction 37 2.5 Oxygen and sulphur stable isotopes 37 2.6 CarbonUniversity and nitrogen stable of isotopes Cape Town 38 2.7 Strontium, lead and elemental concentration analysis 39 2.8 Radiocarbon dating 41 2.9 Data analysis 42 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Coevolution of Cycads and Dinosaurs George E
    Coevolution of cycads and dinosaurs George E. Mustoe* INTRODUCTION TOXICOLOGY OF EXTANT CYCADS cycads suggests that the biosynthesis of ycads were a major component of Illustrations in textbooks commonly these compounds was a trait that C forests during the Mesozoic Era, the depict herbivorous dinosaurs browsing evolved early in the history of the shade of their fronds falling upon the on cycad fronds, but biochemical evi- Cycadales. Brenner et al. (2002) sug- scaly backs of multitudes of dinosaurs dence from extant cycads suggests that gested that macrozamin possibly serves a that roamed the land. Paleontologists these reconstructions are incorrect. regulatory function during cycad have long postulated that cycad foliage Foliage of modern cycads is highly toxic growth, but a strong case can be made provided an important food source for to vertebrates because of the presence that the most important reason for the reptilian herbivores, but the extinction of two powerful neurotoxins and carcin- evolution of cycad toxins was their of dinosaurs and the contemporaneous ogens, cycasin (methylazoxymethanol- usefulness as a defense against foliage precipitous decline in cycad popula- beta-D-glucoside) and macrozamin (beta- predation at a time when dinosaurs were tions at the close of the Cretaceous N-methylamine-L-alanine). Acute symp- the dominant herbivores. The protective have generally been assumed to have toms triggered by cycad foliage inges- role of these toxins is evidenced by the resulted from different causes. Ecologic tion include vomiting, diarrhea, and seed dispersal characteristics of effects triggered by a cosmic impact are abdominal cramps, followed later by loss modern cycads. a widely-accepted explanation for dino- of coordination and paralysis of the saur extinction; cycads are presumed to limbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Biology of Cycad Pollen, Seed and Tissue - a Plant Conservation Perspective
    Bot. Rev. (2018) 84:295–314 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-018-9203-z Comparative Biology of Cycad Pollen, Seed and Tissue - A Plant Conservation Perspective J. Nadarajan1,2 & E. E. Benson 3 & P. Xaba 4 & K. Harding3 & A. Lindstrom5 & J. Donaldson4 & C. E. Seal1 & D. Kamoga6 & E. M. G. Agoo7 & N. Li 8 & E. King9 & H. W. Pritchard1,10 1 Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Wakehurst Place, Ardingly, West Sussex RH17 6TN, UK; e-mail: [email protected] 2 The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Ltd, Private Bag 11600, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand; e-mail [email protected] 3 Damar Research Scientists, Damar, Cuparmuir, Fife KY15 5RJ, UK; e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 4 South African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch National Botanical Garden, Cape Town, Republic of South Africa; e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 5 Nong Nooch Tropical Botanical Garden, Chonburi 20250, Thailand; e-mail: [email protected] 6 Joint Ethnobotanical Research Advocacy, P.O.Box 27901, Kampala, Uganda; e-mail: [email protected] 7 De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines; e-mail: [email protected] 8 Fairy Lake Botanic Garden, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; e-mail: [email protected] 9 UNEP-World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK; e-mail: [email protected] 10 Author for Correspondence; e-mail: [email protected] Published online: 5 July 2018 # The Author(s) 2018 Abstract Cycads are the most endangered of plant groups based on IUCN Red List assessments; all are in Appendix I or II of CITES, about 40% are within biodiversity ‘hotspots,’ and the call for action to improve their protection is long- standing.
    [Show full text]
  • 35 Ideal Landscape Cycads
    3535 IdealIdeal LandscapeLandscape CycadsCycads Conserve Cycads by Growing Them -- Preservation Through Propagation Select Your Plant Based on these Features: Exposure: SunSun ShadeShade ☻☻ ColdCold☻☻ Filtered/CoastalFiltered/Coastal SunSun ▲▲ Leaf Length and Spread: Compact, Medium or Large? Growth Rate and Ultimate Plant Size Climate: Subtropical, Mediterranean, Temperate? Dry or Moist? Leaves -- Straight or Arching? Ocean-Loving, Salt-Tolerant, Wind-Tolerant CeratozamiaCeratozamiaCeratozamiaCeratozamia SpeciesSpeciesSpeciesSpecies ☻Shade Loving ☻Cold TolerTolerantant ▲Filtered/Coastal Sun 16 named + several undescribed species Native to Mexico, Guatemala & Belize Name originates from Greek ceratos (horned), and azaniae, (pine cone) Pinnate (feather-shaped) leaves, lacking a midrib, and horned, spiny cones Shiny, darker green leaves arching or upright, often emerging red or brown Less “formal” looking than other cycads Prefer Shade ½ - ¾ day, or afternoon shade Generally cold-tolerant CeratozamiaCeratozamia ---- SuggestedSuggested SpeciesSpecies ☻Shade Loving ☻Cold TolerTolerantant ▲Filtered/Coastal Sun Ceratozamia mexicana Tropical looking but cold-tolerant, native to dry mountainous areas in the Sierra Madre Mountains (Mexican Rockies). Landscape specimen works well with water features, due to arching habit. Prefers shade, modest height, with a spread of up to 10 feet. Trunk grows to 2 feet tall. Leaflets can be narrow or wider (0.75-2 inches). CeratozamiaCeratozamia ---- SuggestedSuggested SpeciesSpecies ☻Shade Loving ☻Cold TolerTolerantant ▲Filtered/Coastal Sun Ceratozamia latifolia Rare Ceratozamia named for its broad leaflets. Native to cloud forests of the Sierra Madre mountains of Mexico, underneath oak trees. Emergent trunk grows to 1 foot tall, 8 inches in diameter. New leaves emerge bronze, red or chocolate brown, hardening off to bright green, semiglossy, and grow to 6 feet long. They are flat lance-shaped, asymmetric, and are broadest above middle, growing to 10 inches long and 2 inches wide.
    [Show full text]
  • Cop16 Inf. 34 (English Only / Únicamente En Inglés / Seulement En Anglais)
    CoP16 Inf. 34 (English only / Únicamente en inglés / Seulement en anglais) CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________________ Sixteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties Bangkok (Thailand), 3-14 March 2013 CITES TRADE – A GLOBAL ANALYSIS OF TRADE IN APPENDIX-I LISTED SPECIES 1. The attached document has been submitted by the Secretariat at the request of the UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC)* in relation to item 21 on Capacity building. 2. The research was facilitated through funds made available by the Government of Germany. * The geographical designations employed in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the CITES Secretariat or the United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The responsibility for the contents of the document rests exclusively with its author. CoP16 Inf. 34 – p. 1 CITES Trade - A global analysis of trade in Appendix I-listed species United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre February, 2013 UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road Cambridge CB3 0DL United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 1223 277314 Fax: +44 (0) 1223 277136 Email: [email protected] Website: www.unep-wcmc.org The United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) is the specialist biodiversity assessment centre of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the world’s foremost intergovernmental environmental organisation. The Centre has been in operation for over 30 years, combining scientific research with practical policy advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaster Management Plan
    SARAH BAARTMAN DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY DISASTER RISK MANANAGEMENT PLAN Contents Part 1 Introduction Foreword Authority for Planning Amendments Setting the scene Definitions The Municipal disaster management framework setting out Responsibilities and co-ordination Who will implement the plan and the custodian of the plan? Part 2 Description of Sarah Baartman District Part 3 Risk Management Process Section 1: Introduction Section 2: Risk Assessment Section 3: Assessing the Local Risk Section 4: Summarised Risk Metrics Section 5: Top Priority Risk Assessment Summaries Section 6: Impact of relevant global risk conditions Section 7: Recommended way forward Section 8: Generic Municipal Information Part 5 External Liaison and Stakeholders Participation Part 6 Operational Planning Part 7 Disaster Management SOPs (standard operating Protocols) PART ONE Foreword “Whilst hazards are inevitable, and the elimination of all risks impossible, there are many technical measures, traditional practices and public experiences that can reduce the extent or severity of economic, environmental and social disasters.” South Africa is susceptible to a range of hazards, both natural and technological, which have the capacity to impact significantly on national and municipal development strategies and initiatives. The sustainability of such initiatives will therefore depend very much on how successfully risks associated with these hazards can be managed. This Disaster Management Plan has been developed by Sarah Baartman District Municipality Disaster Management Centre,
    [Show full text]
  • Pollination and Germination As Limiting Factors in the Propagation of Threatened Cycads, Encephalartos (Zamiaceae)
    Pollination and germination as limiting factors in the propagation of threatened cycads, Encephalartos (Zamiaceae) Phakamani M’Afrika Xaba A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Magister Scientiae in the department of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology of the University of Western Cape. Date of submission: 12 November 2014 KEY WORDS Encephalartos latifrons Encephalartos altensteinii Pollen viability Pollen storage Pollen germination Artificial wet pollination Artificial dry pollination Seed storage Seed pre-treatment Seed germination i ABSTRACT Cycads are the most threatened living organisms assessed to date (IUCN, 2010). Encephalartos is an African cycad genus which in South Africa has a high diversity but threatened status. This study focuses on the Critically Endangered cycad Encephalartos latifrons, which exhibits low seed viability (< 10) in ex situ living collections in the Kirstenbosch National Botanical Garden (KNBG). This is the largest known ex situ collection of E. latifrons, and the conservation programme of this species has been negatively affected by the unknown cause of low seed germination. This study hypothesised that low seed germination in E. latifrons at KNBG was caused by: firstly, low pollen viability as a result of storage or environmental conditions; secondly by factors with the wet artificial pollination method and its synchronous application to the diurnal formation of pollination droplets in ovules; thirdly, seed storage factors (period and environmental conditions) and the lack of seed pre-treatment (scarification and hormone). This study compared E. latifrons to a more common cycad E. altensteinii with high seed viability (> 60%) at KNBG. Encephalartos latifrons pollen viability results show that fresh and stored pollen of specimens cultivated at KNBG was high (>60%) and comparable to pollen from the wild, that was above the recommended standard (>40%) (Stanley & Linskens, 1974), and only started losing viability after three years.
    [Show full text]
  • Cycad Aulacaspis Scale
    CycadCycad AulacaspisAulacaspis ScaleScale InvasiveInvasive PestPest withwith ExtinctionExtinction Potential!Potential! Photo: Anne Brooke, Guam National Wildlife Refuge Jody Haynes Montgomery Botanical Center, 11901 Old Cutler Road, Miami, FL 33156 USA [email protected] GeneralGeneral CycadCycad InformationInformation OrderOrder:: CycadalesCycadales FamiliesFamilies:: BoweniaceaeBoweniaceae,, Cycadaceae,Cycadaceae, Stangeriaceae,Stangeriaceae, ZamiaceaeZamiaceae ExtantExtant speciesspecies:: 302302 currentlycurrently recognizedrecognized Photo: Dennis Stevenson DistributionDistribution:: PantropicalPantropical ConservationConservation statusstatus:: CycadsCycads representrepresent oneone ofof thethe mostmost threatenedthreatened plantplant groupsgroups worldwide;worldwide; >50%>50% listedlisted asas threatenedthreatened oror endangeredendangered Photo: Tom Broome Photo: Mark Bonta AulacaspisAulacaspis yasumatsuiyasumatsui TakagiTakagi OrderOrder:: Hemiptera/HomopteraHemiptera/Homoptera FamilyFamily:: DiaspididaeDiaspididae CommonCommon namesnames:: OfficialOfficial cycadcycad aulacaspisaulacaspis scalescale (CAS)(CAS) OtherOther AsianAsian cycadcycad scale,scale, ThaiThai scale,scale, snowsnow scalescale NativeNative distributiondistribution:: AndamanAndaman IslandsIslands toto Vietnam,Vietnam, W. Tang, USDA-APHIS-PPQ includingincluding ThailandThailand andand probablyprobably Cambodia,Cambodia, Laos,Laos, peninsularpeninsular Malaysia,Malaysia, Myanmar,Myanmar, southernmostsouthernmost China,China, andand possiblypossibly
    [Show full text]
  • EC Sbmain 032018 Grahamst
    !C !.C^ !C$ñ ^!C ^ ^ !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C ^ !C^ !C !C !C !C !C^ !C ñ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C ^$ !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ ^!C !C !C !C ñ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C ^ ^ !C ñ !C !C !C $ !C !C !C!C ^ !C !C !C ^ !C !C ñ !C !C !C ñ!.C^ !C !C ñ !C ^ !C !C ^ ^ ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C ñ !C !C ^ !C ñ !C !C !C ñ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ñ !C !C ^ !C ^ !C !C !C ñ!C ^!C !. ^ !C !C !C ^ !C !C ^ ñ $ ^$!C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C !.^ $ !C !C ñ !C !C ^ !C !C !C $ ^ !C !C $!C !C !C ñ !. $ !C !C !C !C!C !C ñ!C. ^ ^ ^ !C $!.!C^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C!C !. !C !C !C !C !.^!C !C !C !C !C ñ !C !Cñ^ !C !C ñ !.^ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^!C!C ^$ !C ^ñ!C ñ !C ñ!C!.^ !C !. ^ !C !C ^ñ !. !C $^ ñ^!C ^ ^ !C ^ ñ ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C ^ !C $ !. ñ!C !C !C ^ !C.^ ñ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^!.$C !. !. !C ^ ^ !C !C^ !C !C!. !C !C !C ñ!C !C !. $!C^ !C !C !C !C !C !.
    [Show full text]