Advancement for Recovery Initiative for Safer Ethiopia (Arise) Programme

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Advancement for Recovery Initiative for Safer Ethiopia (Arise) Programme ADVANCEMENT FOR RECOVERY INITIATIVE FOR SAFER ETHIOPIA (ARISE) PROGRAMME AFTER ACTION REVIEW (AAR) OF THE GEDEO AND GUJI INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS (IDP) RESPONSE WORKSHOP PROCEEDINGS Group picture of meeting participants 7 - 9 August 2019 Adama Ethiopia PREFACE The inter-communal conflicts in Gedeo and To address the crisis, the Federal Government of West Guji caused a massive displacement of more Ethiopia and NDRMC, in collaboration with Oromia than 800,000 people. The conflict led to substantial and SNNP Regional States and Guji and Gedeo Zones negative impacts on the displaced population. activated the Emergency Operation Center to save Households lost their long-established assets and lives and ensure effective coordination mechanisms. means of livelihoods. The displacements placed For the first time in Ethiopia response plan, EOC was enormous pressure on the host communities, the activated an Incident Command Post (ICP) in Gedeo environment and natural resources. According to and Guji Zones. the response plan of June 2018, a total of USD 117.7 million was required to meet the immediate needs of Organizational learning requires continuous the affected population. The Government of Ethiopia assessment of organizational performance, looking and partners have so far mobilized USD 6.99 million at successes and failures, ensuring that learning which is only 5.9 percent out of the total financial takes place to support continuous improvement. Key requirement to respond to the crisis. actors engaged in the IDP response need to learn and make corrective actions from how the response Following the crisis, Emergency Operation Centers was planned, operationalized and coordinated with (EOCs) were activated in July 2018 in both Gedeo and key stakeholders from the government, UN Agencies West Guji Zones to address the humanitarian needs and INGOs for effective IDP crisis in the future. and coordinate response activities. Therefore, the key stakeholders from the federal government to the community level reviewed the The response actions were implemented with performance of the EOC/ECC within the response the deployment of substantial financial and material timeline at an After Action Review (AAR) workshop to resources and senior national and international discuss issues in an open and transparent platform multi-sectoral experts from UN Agencies and INGOs and identify lessons to improve future humanitarian to support the various activities and functions. operations. The Emergency Operation Center brought both government and humanitarian communities The workshop conceptualization, design and together to better coordinate the utilization of overall facilitation was led by ADPC as part of a available resources and share information for better partnership to build the capacity of NDRMC and response. its partners in Ethiopia for improved humanitarian preparedness, response and recovery. The Government of Ethiopia commenced and led IDP return process in September 2018. However, These proceedings are the summary of key this effort was challenged by another round of experiences and perspectives from the government prolonged displacements in the following year. For and partners’ representatives from UN Agencies instance, the highest influx of IDPs was recorded in and INGOs, as well as presentations and key March 2019 since the one happened in April 2018. discussions of the AAR workshop including gathering The National Disaster Risk Management Commission feedback from the representatives of the affected (NDRMC) reported a total of 675,000 displaced communities. The outcomes will contribute to populations in Gedeo Zone in March 2019. In April future informed decisions and actions at federal, 2019, the Government of Ethiopia launched a plan to regional, zonal and woredas levels on effective IDPs return all IDPs to their place of origin and has been emergency response in the future. responding to the needs of the displaced, returnee and host communities. WORKSHOP PROCEEDINGS ii COMMISSIONER’S MESSAGE Mr. Mitiku Kassa, Commissioner of the National Disaster Risk Management Commission (NDRMC), welcomed representative from ADPC, regional government, Sectoral Lead Ministries and Agencies, UN and NGO partners, and Directors of NDRMC and opened the workshop by making key remarks. The workshop has brought together various actors actively involved in Gedeo and Guji IDP Response Operation to reflect on what has been accomplished and identify key learning for the future. During the last two years, inter-communal violence has resulted in a massive displacement of about 2.8 million people. The displaced populations in Gedeo and West Guji were 800,000 which made it the largest and demanded high and complex response operation managed by the Ethiopian Government and its partners. iii ADVANCEMENT FOR RECOVERY INITIATIVE FOR SAFER ETHIOPIA (ARISE) PROGRAMME The operation involved establishment of two NDRMC has established a partnership with ADPC EOC operations at Dilla and BuleHora towns to facilitate South-South Knowledge and Experience and deployment of huge financial, material and Exchange between Asia and Ethiopia and then to human resources including senior national and Africa. In light with this, ADPC and NDRMC are jointly international multi-sectoral experts to support the implementing two projects funded by the Bill & various functions of the response. Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) since June 2018. Accompanying the activation of the EOC in the The After Action Review of Gedeo and Guji IDP two locations and simultaneous enhancement response, is a part of the ADPC project entitled of the response operation, the various national (Advancement of Recovery Initiatives for Safer coordination platforms moved their regular Ethiopia (ARISE)” that specifically focuses on meetings to the actual operation area for effective improving NDRMC and its partner organization timely decision making and provide closer leadership capacity to IDP response. support to the technical team deployed on the ground. The workshop is aimed at providing a platform for NDRMC and humanitarian organizations involved The Government (through NDRMC) and partners in the Gedeo and Guji IDP response to look back went through multiple challenges during the and review how the emergency response operation emergency operation to meet the mutual obligation was executed and identify key learning to improve of saving people’s lives. similar operations in the future. The established coordination systems, Experts from diverse background and experience commitments by the Federal and Regional from the federal, regional, zonal levels of the Government and collaboration with the humanitarian government offices, UN Agencies, NGOs and donors partners made the response operation successful participated the After Action Review workshop. Most in addressing most of the needs of the displaced importantly, community representatives, not just as population and saving lives. beneficiaries but as key stakeholders participated in the workshop to contribute their inputs on IDP The lessons learned from the coordinated response coordination process at the community operations executed during Gedeo and Guji IDP level. crisis has helped NDRMC and the humanitarian partners to better plan and improve emergency The participants in this workshop have been responses to the IDP situations that came up during involved in the response operation in different roles. the latter part 2018 and 2019. Thy will have the opportunity to openly share their views freely and actively contribute to joint review However, it is crucial to properly identify, analyse, and learning process. synthesize and document the lessons learned from the implementation of IDP response operations to The After Action Review workshop will discuss improve organizational capacity development and key issues and challenges that faced during better prepare for effective response operations to implementation and come up with new learning similar eventualities of such kind in the future. and recommendations for capacity improvement. With this context, NDRMC in collaboration with NDRMC is committed to taking forward to Asian Disaster Preparedness Center (ADPC) has the consolidated learning that comes out of this organized the After Action Review to bring together workshop to higher level government coordination and facilitate learning for the key stakeholder and partners’ coordination and find mechanism organizations and individuals directly involved in for integrating the suggested priority areas of Gedeo and Guji IDP response operation. improvement into the future engagements in humanitarian response operations. WORKSHOP PROCEEDINGS iv CONTENTS Preface ii Commissioner’s Message iii Executive Summary vii 1. INTRODUCTION 01 1.1 Purpose and Objectives 01 1.2 Methodology 02 1.3 Report Organization 02 2. INCIDENT OVERVIEW 03 2.1 Overview of Gedeo and West Guji Displacement and Emergency Operation Coordination 03 2.2 IDP Response Timeline 06 3. INCIDENT RESPONSE ANALYSIS 08 3.1 Overview of National Incident Management System 08 3.2 Issues and Challenges 09 3.3 Operationalization of Existing Plans and Capacities 11 3.4 Performance Assessment of ECC Capabilities 15 4. KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 5. CONCLUSION 19 ANNEX I. WORKSHOP AGENDA i ANNEX II. ECC CAPABILITY RATING iii ANNEX III. IMPROVEMENT PLAN MATRIX ix v ADVANCEMENT FOR RECOVERY INITIATIVE FOR SAFER ETHIOPIA (ARISE) PROGRAMME ACRONYMS AAR After Action Review ADPC Asian Disaster Preparedness Center DTM Displacement
Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • Humanitarian Bulletin
    Humanitarian Bulletin Ethiopia Issue #3| 17– 23 Feb. 2020 In this issue Recovery programming to returnees P.1 US$51.5 required for DL response P.2 Ethiopia’s ratification of the Kampala HIGHLIGHTS Convention P.2 • A US$20 million The personal story of Damma Abbalosa, recovery project an IDP in Hara Kela, Guji Zone P.3 (2019-2022) to benefit 50,000 Funding update P.4 households heavily impacted by the Gedeo-West Guji Displacement. • The project seeks to complement 50,000 returnee HHs in Gedeo and West Guji humanitarian assistance by zones to benefit from recovery programming supporting IDPs and local communities as A four-year recovery project (2019-2022) is underway in Gedeo zone SNNP region and per UNDP’s global West Guji zone, Oromia region with a total required budget of US$20 million. The project 3x6 approach that targets 50,000 households heavily impacted by the Gedeo-West Guji displacement in builds resilience in Kercha and Hamela Wamena woredas of West Guji Zone and Gedeb and Yirgachefe post-crisis situations woredas of Gedeo Zone. The project comes in complement of humanitarian assistance by for vulnerable groups supporting IDPs and local communities in the next phase towards recovery as per UNDP’s through introducing global 3x6 approach that builds resilience in post-crisis situations for vulnerable groups sustainable through introducing sustainable livelihoods. livelihoods. FIGURES People People in need targeted Food/Non- 8.4 M 7 M food SAM 544K 444K MAM 3.9 M 3.1 M IDPs 1.01M 1.01M Returnees 1.78 M 1.78 M HUMANITARIAN FUNDING US$1.001 billion Requirement for 2020 Ethiopia Humanitarian Response Plan Figure 1 IDPs sheltering at Harmufo site, Gedeb town at the height of the crisis in July 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA Humanitarian Access Situation Report June – July 2019
    ETHIOPIA Humanitarian Access Situation Report June – July 2019 This report is produced by OCHA Ethiopia in collaboration with humanitarian partners. It covers the period June - July 2019. The next report will be issued around September - October 2019. OVERVIEW IUS • In June - July, Ethiopia experienced an at- TIGRAY 276 Access incidents reported tempted government overthrow in Amhara, Western socio-political unrest in Sidama (SNNPR), North Gondar Wag Hamra Central Gondar and a rise in security incidents in Southwest- Zone 4 (Fantana Rasu) AFAR ern Oromia and Gambella. The quality of ac- Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) cess declined, limiting assistance to people AMHARA No. o incidents by one South Wello Metekel in need, against a backdrop of massive gov- Oromia East Gojam BENISHANGUL Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) 4 13 35 49 AsosaGUMUZ Siti ernment-led returns of IDP to areas of origin. Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) North Shewa(O) North Shewa(A) Kemashi Dire Dawa urban West Wellega East Wellega DIRE DAWA West Shewa Fafan • Hostilities between Ethiopian Defense Forc- ADDIS ABABA Kelem Wellega East Hararge Finfine Special West Hararge es (EDF) and Unidentified Armed Groups Buno Bedele East Shewa Etang Special Ilu Aba Bora Jarar OROMIA Erer (UAGs) as well as inter-ethnic, remained the GAMBELA Jimma Agnewak main access obstacle, with 197 incidents Doolo Nogob West Arsi SOMALI (out of 276), mostly in Southwestern Oromia SNNP Sidama Bale Korahe (110). The Wellegas, West Guji (Oromia), and Gedeo Shabelle Gambella, were the most insecure areas for Segen Area P. West Guji Guji aid workers. Liban Borena • In June, conflict in the Wellegas scaled up, Daawa with explosive devices attacks causing ci- Source: Access Incidents database vilian casualties in urban centres.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: West Guji – Gedeo Conflict Displacement Flash Update 2
    Ethiopia: West Guji – Gedeo Conflict Displacement Flash Update 2 22 May 2018 Highlights • A rapid assessment conducted in Gedeo zone (SNNPR) found that at least 274,5481 people were displaced from West Guji (Oromia) to Gedeo zone following the violence that erupted along the regional boundary in mid-April. Some 84,000 people were also displaced in West Guji zone. More than 4,000 houses were reportedly burnt down or damaged in West Guji and livelihoods destroyed. • Official reports indicate that as of early May, 102,593 people of the 274,548 people displaced in Gedeo were returned to their villages in West Guji zone • The Government, the local community and civil society were the first and main responders to date, with sup- port from few partners. Significant gaps in food, shelter, NFI and WaSH are reported • Although there were no reported health outbreaks so far, AWD, scabies and measles are potential health risks due to the use of water from unsafe sources, open defecation, overcrowded shelter and sharing of clothes. The overcrowded shelter conditions within hosting households also present protection concerns. Dara Sidama Dila I. Displacement overview ! 12,176 452 Bore Chichu A rapid assessment conducted in Gedeo zone ! 3,772 (SNNPR) from 2 to 8 May found that at least Dila Zuria stite eturns 274,548 people (139,494 male; 135,104 female) Wenago einin ! were displaced from West Guji (Oromia) to Gedeo Bule isceent 4,844 ! Koti ! zone, following the inter-communal violence that 8,198 Ilalcha ! erupted in mid-April 2018 along the borders of the Wenago Bule Abaya two zones.
    [Show full text]
  • Damage and Loss Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ©UNHCR/Adelina Gomez
    ©UNHCR/Anna Helge Damage and Loss Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ©UNHCR/Adelina Gomez TABLE OF CONTENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 DAMAGE AND LOSS IN AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION SECTORS 4 DAMAGE ON LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SYSTEM 5 DAMAGE AND LOSS ASSESMENT ON SOCIAL AND INFRAESTRUCTURAL 6 SECTORS • Private houses 6 • Public Infrastructure 7 • Recommendations 8 LEGAL ASSISTANCE NEEDS 10 • Access to justice 10 • Access to Land holding certificate 11 • Customary/Traditional justice system 12 • Recommendations 12 CONFLICT, PEACE BUILDING AND SOCIAL COHESION 13 POSSIBLE APPROACHES FOR CONFLICT TRANSFORMATION AND PEACE- 14 BUILDING IN THE CONTEXT OF GUJI AND GEDEO ETHNIC GROUPS • Building Trust 14 • Developing social cohesion 15 • Supporting local buy-in 15 • Recommendations 16 APPENDIX 1 18 - 2 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Damage and Loss Assessment in West Guji Bule Hora University initiated a Damage and Loss Assessment (DaLA) in West Guji zone in collaboration with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and the West Guji Zonal Disaster Risk Management Office to assess loss and damages incurred during the intercommunal conflict between the Gedeo and Guji people in 2018, which displaced hundreds of thousands. The assessment also analyzed legal assistance needs, as well as the potential for peace-building and social cohesion. A total of 78,257HHs (508,671 individuals) with an average family size of 6.5/HH were severely exposed to multiple socio-economic crises due to the conflict. Following the Government’s initiated return process based on the alleged improved safety and security situation (assessed by the Government) in May 2019, according to the Government, the majority of the IDPs were returned to their places of habitual residence 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia Humanitarian Situation Report
    UNICEF ETHIOPIA HUMANITARIAN SITUATION REPORT ETHIOPIA Humanitarian Situation Report SitRep # 5 - Reporting Period May 2019 SITUATION IN NUMBERS Highlights 4.89 million # of children in need of humanitarian Failed spring rains this year in parts of Afar, Amhara, Oromia and Somali regions have renewed concerns about another drought affecting children, assistance (Ethiopia Humanitarian Needs Overview 2019) further compounding vulnerabilities in regions already suffering from chronic food insecurity, prolonged and complex population displacements, and increased risks to outbreaks of cholera and measles. These regions 8.86 million also have over-stretched health care systems, poor access to water, and # of people in need recurrent outbreaks of preventable diseases. (Ethiopia Humanitarian Needs Overview 2019) As of April 2019, UNICEF has supported the screening and admission of 110,826 children under the age of five for severe acute malnutrition (SAM) 3.19 million treatment and the numbers are expected to grow with the projected Internally displaced persons in Ethiopia drought in the country. (Ethiopia Humanitarian Needs Overview 2019) UNICEF Ethiopia urgently requires US$ 5.4 million to replenish its nutrition commodities pipeline for the expected surge in severe acute malnutrition 919,938 (SAM) in 2019. In addition, US$ 2.45 million is required to rehabilitate 35 Registered refugees and asylum seekers in water schemes and provide durable safe water and sanitation for the most Ethiopia vulnerable children, including displaced children,
    [Show full text]
  • The Quest for Resolution of Guji-Gedeo Conflicts in Southern Ethiopia: a Review of Mechanisms Employed, Actors and Their Effectiveness
    The Quest for Resolution of Guji-Gedeo Conflicts in Southern Ethiopia: A Review of Mechanisms Employed, Actors and Their Effectiveness Girum Kinfemichael1 Abstract This article assesses the quest for resolution of Guji-Gedeo conflicts, the federal device as a means of managing conflict employed and their effectiveness. Methodologically, the study is mainly based on qualitative approach with an opinion and descriptive surveys to reveal the existing problems. It emerges from the study that the different structures, processes and mechanisms, which are employed at various levels of administrative hierarchies of governments for managing the conflicts, remain ad-hoc, not well-coordinated and, above all, their actions are mainly reactive. The study draws an argumentative conclusion that the Federal Government and authorities of the Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples’ Region (SNNPR) and Oromiya Regional State need to boost their close cooperation, engagement in early warning and conflict management endeavors in addressing the conflict as the two communities are still at loggerheads over the issue of defining the contested boundary claims. It is also useful to extend the scope of such cooperation and engagement to the level of local governments in both Regional States. Along with these efforts, it would be better if authorities at various levels revitalize and empower traditional conflict resolution institutions to run parallel with ‘modern’ government structures to respond to the conflicts promptly. It is thus prudent to use the advantage of federalism as flexible and innovative system of governance to manage the conflict constructively. Keywords: Boundary conflicts, ethnicity, ethnic federation, federal restructuring, Guji-Gedeo conflicts, indigenous institutions. 1 Lecturer, Department of Federalism and Local Government Studies, Institute of Federalism and Legal Studies, Ethiopian Civil Service University.
    [Show full text]
  • Adola Woreda of Guji Zone Who Visited Treatment Centre in Adjacent Woreda (Arbegona) of South Regional State on 20Th of July
    Ethiopia Technical support feedback report on acute watery diarrhea outbreak Reporting period: 06-16/08/2006 Area: Guji zone, Oromia regional state Prepared by: Dr Desta Abunu Private consultant 0 1 Table of contents Introduction ___________________________________________________________3 Background situation of Guji zone _________________________________________4 Water and sanitation ________________________________________________________ 0 Gaps identified and technical support provided________________________________0 Stakeholders involved in the epidemic prevention and control interventions __________ 1 Challenges encountered __________________________________________________1 Cross cutting issues that needs consideration in subsequent assignment____________2 Opportunities __________________________________________________________2 Conclusion ____________________________________________________________2 Recommendations and next steps___________________________________________3 Appendix ______________________________________________________________4 2 Introduction Outbreak of acute watery diarrhea established itself in West Arusi zone of Oromia regional state around the middle of June. Soon it affected south regional state and showed itself up in Guji zone of Oromia regional state in space of less than one month. The first index case of Guji zone was from Adola woreda of Guji zone who visited treatment centre in adjacent woreda (Arbegona) of south regional state on 20th of July. Immediately south regional state health bureau communicated
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA Humanitarian Access Situation Report October - December 2019
    ETHIOPIA Humanitarian Access Situation Report October - December 2019 This report is produced by OCHA Ethiopia in collaboration with humanitarian partners. It covers the period October - December 2019. The next report will be issued on March 2020. OVERVIEW ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Key figures ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! • The operational environment to relief opera- ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tigray ! ! ! ! ! Access incidents reported ! ! 259 ! ! ! ! ! ! Western ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! tions in Ethiopia remained permissive through ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 Aid worker killed ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! North! Gondar ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! the reporting period. ! ! ! ! ! ! Aid workers injured ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wag! Hamra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Central Gondar ! Southern ! ! ! ! ! ! West Gondar ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Zone 4 (Fantana Rasu) ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Afar ! ! ! ! ! North Wello! ! No. of incidents by woreda ! ! ! ! • Localized armed confrontations, ethnic vio- ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! South Gondar ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Amhara ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! lence, intra-community/ clan tensions, and so- ! ! ! ! !
    [Show full text]
  • Periodic Monitoring Report Working 2016 Humanitarian Requirements Document – Ethiopia Group
    DRMTechnical Periodic Monitoring Report Working 2016 Humanitarian Requirements Document – Ethiopia Group Covering 1 Jan to 31 Dec 2016 Prepared by Clusters and NDRMC Introduction The El Niño global climactic event significantly affected the 2015 meher/summer rains on the heels of failed belg/ spring rains in 2015, driving food insecurity, malnutrition and serious water shortages in many parts of the country. The Government and humanitarian partners issued a joint 2016 Humanitarian Requirements Document (HRD) in December 2015 requesting US$1.4 billion to assist 10.2 million people with food, health and nutrition, water, agriculture, shelter and non-food items, protection and emergency education responses. Following the delay and erratic performance of the belg/spring rains in 2016, a Prioritization Statement was issued in May 2016 with updated humanitarian requirements in nutrition (MAM), agriculture, shelter and non-food items and education.The Mid-Year Review of the HRD identified 9.7 million beneficiaries and updated the funding requirements to $1.2 billion. The 2016 HRD is 69 per cent funded, with contributions of $1.08 billion from international donors and the Government of Ethiopia (including carry-over resources from 2015). Under the leadership of the Government of Ethiopia delivery of life-saving and life- sustaining humanitarian assistance continues across the sectors. However, effective humanitarian response was challenged by shortage of resources, limited logistical capacities and associated delays, and weak real-time information management. This Periodic Monitoring Report (PMR) provides a summary of the cluster financial inputs against outputs and achievements against cluster objectives using secured funding since the launch of the 2016 HRD.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: Humanitarian Access Situation Report
    ETHIOPIA Humanitarian Access Situation Report January - March 2020 This report is produced by OCHA Ethiopia in collaboration with humanitarian partners. It covers the period January to March 2020. The next report will be issued in June 2020. OVERVIEW • The operational environment to relief operations North Number of incidents by woreda Western Central remained permissive through the reporting period. Western TIGRAY Eastern 1 - 2 3 - 4 5 - 6 South Kilbet Most access impediments continue related to hos- North Rasu Gondar Eastern Wag tilities, intra-community conflicts or social unrest, Central Southern Gondar Hamra West Fantana hindering the quality of the humanitarian response, Gondar AMHARA North Wello Rasu AFAR and to COVID-19. South Awsi Gondar Rasu Metekel Hari Awi West East South Wello Gojam Rasu • Humanitarian partners are committed to support BENISHANGUL Gojam Oromia GUMUZ Siti the government response to COVID-19 and ensure North North Gabi Kemashi Horo Shewa DIRE DAWA West Shewa Rasu that critical activities are sustained. Partners are Gudru West Mao Komo Wellega Wellega Shewa Fafan Special East Addis Ababa actively implementing precautionary measures to Wellega HARARI Kelem Wellega East South West West ensure the safety of aid personnel and the popula- Buno Bedele East Hararge Hararge Ilu Aba Shewa Shewa Guraghe GAMBELA Bora Jarar tion. Nuwer Arsi Erer Agnewak Jimma Hadiya Siltie Sheka Yem Sp.Halaba Sp. OROMIA Kembata Mejenger Kefa Doolo Dawuro Tibaro Nogob SOMALI • The humanitarian community is working with gov- Bench Maji West Arsi Konta Sp. Wolayita Bale Gofa Sidama ernment counterparts to ensure that partners can Gamo Korahe Mirab Basketo Gedeo continue movements and operations throughout Omo Amaro SNNP Derashe Alle Guji Shabelle the country, bearing in mind restrictions to contain South Omo BurjiWest Guji Konso Afder the spread of COVID-19.
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA Food Security Outlook January to June 2011
    ETHIOPIA Food Security Outlook January to June 2011 Following the meher harvest, which began in October Figure 1. Current estimated food security outcomes, 2010, food security has generally improved in the January 2011 meher producing parts of the country. However, due to crop damage caused by widespread floods and other weather related shocks the meher harvest is likely to be lower than initially anticipated. The Humanitarian Requirement Documents outlining assistance needs is expected to be released in February 2011. Although the National Meteorology Agency has not provided a forecast for the April to June gu/genna/belg rains, below normal performance of these rains is considered likely. This is expected to exacerbate prevailing food insecurity which resulted from near complete failure of October to December rains in southern pastoral and agro pastoral areas. Due to close to normal sapie (December/January) 2010 rains food security among the dominant root crop, For more information on FEWS NET’s Food Insecurity Severity Scale, please see: www.fews.net/FoodInsecurityScale mainly sweet potatoes growing areas in central and eastern SNNPR is estimated to remain stable Source: FEWS NET and WFP throughout the outlook period. The poor and very poor households normally rely on these harvests, during the March to May lean season. Staple food prices are likely to follow typical seasonal trends throughout the outlook period, though remain higher than the 2005 to 2009 averages given the current harvest and the continued price stabilization measures taken by the government. Seasonal calendar and critical events Source: FEWS NET FEWS NET Washington FEWS NET Ethiopia FEWS NET is a USAID-funded activity.
    [Show full text]