DOCSLIB.ORG

DIFFUSION of AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS in UTTAR PRADESH SINCE 1980'S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DIFFUSION of AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS in UTTAR PRADESH SINCE 1980'S DIFFUSION OF AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS IN UTTAR PRADESH SINCE 1980's DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF iWaster of ^Ijilosopi)? IN GEOGRAPHY BY MD. SHAMIM KHAN UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF DR. ATEEQUE AHMAD (Reader) DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY ALIGARH (INDIA) 2005 DS3938 Dr. Ateeque Ahmad Department of Geography Reader Aligarh Muslim University Aligarh-202002 (India) Dated ^:tJ<.. This is to certify that Mr. Md. Shamim Khan has compehed his M.Phil, dissertation entitled "Diffusion of Agricultural Technological Innovations in Uttar Pradesh since 1980" under my sueprvision. The work presented in the dissertation in my opinion is fit for evaluation. He completed this work with unflagging zeal, interest and enthusiasm and tried to learn the subject assidously. (Dr. Ateeque Ahmad) CONTENTS Page No. Acknowledgement List of Figures List of Tables r-I INTRODUCTION 1 -• 36 (a) Meaning and Definition of Diffusion of Innovations i"^) Sowces of DaVa (c) Work Review Done so Far (d) Methodology (e) Hypothesis (f) Objectives Chapter-II GENERAL PHYSICAL SETTING AND DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF 13TTAR PRADESH ^"^ - ^'^ (i) Geogrpahical Background f (a) Physical Feature (b) Geology ^(c) Soil) (d) Groundwater /(e) Climate ) (f) Rainfall ^ (g) Drainage f (h) Physical Resource Base (i) Importance of Agriculture in State Economy (ii) Demographic Characteristics Chapter-Ill AGRICULTURAL DEVLEOPMENT 68-119 (i) Techno-Institutional Development in ^^ Agriculture - A Spatio-Temporal A.nalysii s J (a) Patterns of Modern Agricultural Technology:' Farm Machinary (Tractor, Iron plough, Wooden plough)*! (b) Irrigation Machinery (electric pumpset, diesel pumpset) f (c) Fertilizer Consumption J (d) Cropping PatternJ (e) Intensity of Cropping j /'(f) Crop Combination I (f(g) Ranking of Crops ^ f (h) Agricultural productivity j» ::hapter-IV LEVEL OF DIFFUSION OF INNOVATIONS : C A SPATIO-TEMPORAL ANALYSIS 120-159 ^ Fertilizer | Irrigation 1 Implements Composite Scores of level of Diffusion of innovations | I, Correlation between Agricultural Productivity and Diffusion of Innovations | j^CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS^ 160-166 '^BIBLIOGRAPHY) ^ 167-176 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS All praise be Allah who gave the guidance and blessing to complete this humble work. I wish to express my deep sense of gratitude to my supervisor, Dr. Ateeque Ahmad, Reader, Department of Geography, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh under whose painstaking guidance and kind super\'ision, this work was carried out. His patient discourses and discussion on the research problems and analysis has been the guiding light informing a correct approach to the subject. His inspiration and encouragement motivated me to complete this work. I also owe great deal to Prof. Salahuddin Qureshi, Chairman, Department of Geography, Aligarh Muslim University for providing me all possible helps during the course of the completion of this work. I am thankful to Prof Ali Mohammad, Dr. Hifzur Rahman, Late Dr. Mohd. Siddiquie, Dr. Najmul Islam Hashmi, Dr. Fazlur Rahman, Dr. Kauser Shamim, Dr. Jamshed Ahmad and Mr. Ghayasuddin from whom I have drawn necessary inspiration for completion of this work. I am deeply indebted to staff members of the Research Library, Department of Geography for their generous help and co-operation in placing the desired material at my disposal. I am also thankful to the staff of the library of the Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh for their constant help. It gives me immense pleasure to express my gratitudes to my parents, maternal uncle, sisters and brothers, Mr. Mohd. Noorain Khan, Mr. Mohd. Meraj Khan, Dr. Reyaz Ahmad, Sajida, Majida, Nigar and Nilo whose continuous encouragement and blessings have always remained a source of enlightenment in my academic career. I do not have appropriate words to thank my friends colleagues and well wishers, Qaiyum Khan, Majid Khan, Tauheed, Afzal, Shahalam, Mustaqeem, Shazi, Naushad Javed, Imran, Zubair, Ramiz, Yasmeen, Shabahat, Kazma and Anwari who accompanied me during the completion of this work. I owe my special gratitude to Mr. Wahab, Asif, Miss Sanobar, Miss Shabnam, Miss Nazish and Miss Saba for extending me the moral support and valuable suggestions. ^i^^"^"^ (Md. SftaBUm Khan) LIST OF FIGURES Figure Title Page No. No. 1.1 Model of Diffusion of Innovation 9 1.2 Logistic Curve of Innovation Adoption 10 2.1 Uttar Pradesh - Administrative Divisions 39 2.2 Uttar Pradesh - Physical Divisions 45 2.3 Uttar Pradesh - Geology 48 2.4 Uttar Pradesh - Soils 52 2.5 Uttar Pradesh - Drainage 58 3.1 Use of Tractors per' 000 hect. 72 3.2 Use of Electric Engines per'000 hect. 74 3.3 Use ofOil Engines per'000 hect. 78 3.4 Use of Fertilizer Consumption in kg per hect. 80 3.5 Use of Wooden Plough per'000 hect.- 82 3.6 Use oflron Plough per'000 hect. 83 3.7 Crop Combination Regions 104 3.8 Ranking of the Crops - First Ranking 108 3.9 Ranking of the Crops - Second Ranking 110 3.10 Ranking of the Crops - Third Ranking ] 12 3.11 Uttar Pradesh-Productivity Region (1985) 116 3.12 Uttar Pradesh - Productivity Region (1995) 118 4.1 (A) Levels of Diffusion of Fertilizer Consumption (1985) 126 4.1(B) Levels of Diffusion of Fertilizer Consumption (1990) 127 4.1(C) Levelsof Diffusion of Fertilizer Consumption (1995) 128 4.2(A) Levels ofDiffusion of Irrigation (1985) 134 4.2(B) Levels ofDiffusion of Irrigation (1990) 135 4.2(C) Levels ofDiffusion of Irrigation (1995) 136 4.3(A) Levels ofDiffusion of Implements (1985) 142 4.3(B) Levels ofDiffusion of Implements (1990) 143 4.3(C) Levels ofDiffusion of Implements (1995) 144 4.4 Levels ofDiffusion of Innovations (1985) 146 4.5 Levelsof Diffusion of Innovations (1990) 148 4.6 Levels of Diffusion of Innovations (1995) 150 5.1(A,B,C) Correlation between Agricultural Productivity and Level of 156-158 Diffusion of Innovations (1985,1990, 1995) 5.1 Regression Line between Agricultural Productivity and Level 156-158 (A,,Bi,Ci) ofDiffusion of Innovations (1985, 1990, 1995) LIST OF TABLES Table Title Page No. No. 2.1 Population of World compared India and Uttar Pradesh 40 2.2 Demographic Characteristics of Uttar Pradesh (2001) 63-65 3.1 Level of Mechanization per '000 hectare in Uttar Pradesh 75-77 3.2 Net Irrigated Area by different sources in Uttar Pradesh 84 3.3 Land Utilization in Uttar Pradesh (1980-81 to 1995-96) 86 3.4 Percentage share of Area under Selected Crops in Uttar 88-99 Pradesh (1980-81 to 1996-97) 4.1 Levels of Diffusion of Fertilizer (1985, 90, 95) 124-125 4.2 Levels of Diffusion of Irrigation (1985, 90, 95) 132-133 4.3 Levels ofDiffusionoflmplements (1985,90,95) 140-141 4.4 Correlation between Agricultural Productivity in Rs./hect. 154-155 and level of Diffusion of Innovations in Uttar Pradesh (1985, 90, 95) Chapter-I INTRODUCTION Meaning and Definition of Diffusion of Innovations 0 ( The term innovation usually is meant to refer to something new in tehcnology, method, idea or invention. Innovation is change over the new ideas, objects or practices from existing one by or constituents of social system. Innovation may show either slight modification significant replacement of ideas in vague. The "idea" is the central element of an innovation either in material form or behavioural form. For idol result the innovation should be adopted both in term of ideas and form i.e. material or behavioural which ultimately felt by attaining intended consequences of an innovation.^ j^- ^^7 (^ ( Innovation refers to some new ideas method, or technology, and its diffusion means not only the spreading of the information over the entire area but also the adoption of the innovation. Nevertheless, the process of the spread of information is vital to the process of adoption, thus the entire diffusion process itself. The diffusion is the process in the course of which an innovation is adopted by those who had not adopted it earlier. In other words, diffusion is the process by which an innovation spread within a social system. Innovation diffuses within a social system at group level and to individuals through its "adoption". Diffusion and adoption are complementary to each other, thus they are closely interrelated.]' LJi '^ Pi (\ ffln agriculture the term "innovation" manifests a material form which include improved implements, high-yielding and disease resistant seeds, chemical fertilizers and plant protection chemicals such as pesticides, fungicides and herbicides.)J , j'^^ ^/•^/ ^Diffusion of agricultural innovations refers to the spread and implementation of new and improved agricultural practices over the existing one by the farmers in terms of use of HYV, pesticides, fungicides, herbicides, mechanisation agricultural farming etc. The reflection of some innovation may be seen in behavioural form e.g. improved cultural practices. In other words we can say that diffusion of agricultural innovations means spread of adoption of improved agricultural practices j ^ -A-w "A/y \3> { Innovation do vary in their diffusion rate, some diffuses at higher rate, while other at slight rate. An innovation which show only a slight modification of an existing idea or practices will obviously diffuses at a faster rate than the one which represents a significant modification over existing one. It is due to the fact that, in slight modification the society need not worry about the changing of whole existing setup or the major part of it. In case of significant modifications there are problems for society to adopt new practices in which major part of existing practices is to be reinstalled.) 7 Some of the important traits of an innovation, which influences its rate of aodption are : utility, compatiability, complexity, communicability and divisibility.)? -j^^^^ 'fy (2) ( Utility of an innovation refers to the degree to which it is perceived as useful and advantageous by farmer. Compatibility is the degree to which an innovation is perceived to be in conformity with the ideas, value and practices of a social system.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jain Irrigation
    15 November 2016 2QFY17 Results Update | Sector: Others Jain Irrigation BSE SENSEX S&P CNX CMP: INR86 TP: INR99(+15%) BUY 26,305 8,108 Bloomberg JI IN Inline results; Outlook remain healthy for 2HFY17; Retain Buy Equity Shares (m) 443.1 Revenue & EBITDA inline, PAT beat estimates: JI reported overall revenue of M.Cap.(INRb)/(USDb) 29.3 / 0.4 INR14.4b (est INR14.34b) as against INR13.17b in 2QFY16 marking a YoY 52-Week Range (INR) 109 / 47 1, 6, 12 Rel. Per (%) -4/27/27 growth of 9.3%. EBITDA stood at INR1.91b (est INR1.86b) in 2QFY17 with Avg Val, INRm/ Vol m 401 EBITDA margins at 13.3% (est 13%), expanding 160bp YoY. Interest cost Free float (%) 69.3 increased to INR1.2b in 2QFY17 vs INR1.1b in 1QFY17 due to increase in debt in this quarter. Adjusted PAT for the quarter stood at a INR280m (est. INR135m) Financials & Valuations (INR b) as against loss of INR54m in 2QFY16. PAT beat our estimates due to tax Y/E Mar 2016 2017E 2018E reversal of INR174m vs our estimates tax outgo of INR35m. Net Sales 62.9 72.3 83.4 EBITDA 8.2 9.9 11.7 Healthy growth outlook for 2HFY17: On consolidated basis, overall Micro PAT 1.0 2.5 4.1 Irrigation Systems (MIS) grew by 13.6% yoy with healthy growth in key markets EPS (INR) 2.2 5.4 8.2 like Maharashtra, AP, Karnataka and Gujarat. Plastic division recorded a 1.3% Gr. (%) 17.7 146.1 52.9 growth YoY due to lower off-take of PE & PVC pipe.
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting Micro Irrigation in India
    [This is a draft paper for discussion. Please do not quote.] IWMI-Tata Water Policy Program Annual Partners’ Meet 2004 Promoting Micro Irrigation in India: A Review of Evidence and Recent Developments* Shilp Verma The research covered by this paper was carried out with generous support from Sir Ratan Tata Trust, Mumbai under the IWMI-Tata Water Policy Program. This is a pre-publication paper prepared for the IWMI-Tata Annual Partners’ Meet, 2004. This is not a peer reviewed paper; views contained in it are those of the author(s) and not of the International Water Management Institute or Sir Ratan Tata Trust. * Based on Research by IWMI-Tata Core Team Visit: http://www.iwmi.org/iwmi-tata ABSTRACT In the classical model of irrigation efficiency, all water applied to the crop is treated as consumed or lost while the integrated basin view of irrigation efficiency views only the effective evapo-transpiration as the consumptive use in irrigation. In either case, increased water efficiency at farm/individual level would not lead to water saving at the system (basin) level unless these higher farm efficiencies are achieved system-wide! Thus, unless the adoption of micro-irrigation is scaled up, it would not make any significant contribution to alleviating the problem of groundwater depletion and in resolving various related issues. Even after more than three decades of promotion by various government and non-government agencies, the spread of micro-irrigation in India is miniscule. The limited growth of micro-irrigation technologies in India can, to a large extent, be explained by the apparent gap between what has been marketed and where the demand lies.
    [Show full text]
  • Marginal Farmers Cover
    SYNTHESIS OF IMPORTANT DICUSSIONS ON MICROFINANCE AND LIVELIHOOD SUPPORT TO SMALL AND MARGINAL FARMERS SPECIAL THANKS We are grateful to the following members of Solution Exchange for their responses to the discussions related to small and marginal farmers – Abhinandan L. B. Prakash Rakesh Das Abhishek Mendiratta L. P. Semwal Rakesh Kumar Gupta Anupama Sharma M L Sukhdeve Ramakrishna Nallathiga Arun Jindal M. Vijaybhasker Srinivas Ravinder Yadav Ashok Kumar Sinha, Mahendra Parida Resham Singh Avishek Gupta Mangesh Patankar Ritesh Dwivedi Bharathi Bhupal Manoj Singh Ruturaj Pattanaik Bhupal Neog Maroti Upare Sachin Kumar Bibhuti B. Pradhan N. Jeyaseelan Sanjay Kumar Gupta D. S. K. Rao N. Srinivasan Sanjay Verma G. K. Agrawal Navin Anand Sanjeev Kumar G. V. Krishnagopal Neelesh Kumar Singh Sarat Kumar Patnaik G. V. Ramanjaneyulu Neelkanth Mishra Satish Kumar Anand George Thomas Neeraj Verma Saurabh Vikas Girija Srinivasan Nidhi Sadana Sabharwal Shailja Kishore Gurusamy Gandhi Nitin Bembalkar Shivani Bhardwaj Harish Chotani P. Purushotham Suman K. A Hemantha Kumar Pamarthy P. S. M. Rao Sunil Kumar Indu Chandra Ram P. Uday Shankar Susanta Kumar Nayak Jalpa Sukhanandi Prakash Kumar Trilochan Sastry Jay Prakash Lall PSM Rao Umesh Chandra Gaur Jaya Patel Puran Singh Yadav Veerashekharappa Kalika Mohapatra R. K. Swarnkar Vineet Rai Kedareswar Choudhury R. V. Kotnala Vineet Sinha Krishan Khanna Rajesh K. Verma The Consolidated Responses in this document are the outcome of the expertise and skills of Resource Persons and Research Associates. We profusely thank Gopi Ghosh, Monika Khanna, Raj Ganguly, T. N. Anuradha, Nitya Jacob and Sunetra Lala. We acknowledge their valuable contributions in preparing some of the consolidate replies incorporated in this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment in Water Infrastructure in India
    MAY 2010 In this issue ¢ Analyzing the US$30 bn annual Deluge of opportunity ¢ Understanding Opportunity pricing and regulation in the water sector ¢ Identifying social and corporate risks Gamechangers ¢ Cost-plus pricing for water, energy ¢ Significant investment in water infrastructure ¢ Water conservation Akhilesh Tilotia [email protected] Mumbai: +91-22-6634-1139 Important disclosures appear at the back About Gamechanger Gamechanger offers perspectives on ideas and developments that can potentially alter the course of the markets. The series will explore and analyze ideas, challenge conventional wisdom, play advocate or devil’s advocate depending on research conclusions. The factors that we identify as market gamechangers could come from anywhere – from policy or politics, from people or ideas, from rain or from regulation. They could change the game for the better or for worse. Gamechanger research has implications on macro socio-economics and on long-term market behavior. Read it and stay ahead of the India story. April 2010 An analysis of India’s readiness for its forthcoming demographic dividend KOTAK INSTITUTIONAL EQUITIES RESEARCH 2 Foreword We borrow from Adam Smith who aptly used the term ‘paradox of value’ to describe the fact that water though life-giving is free while diamonds command a high price. More than 200 years later, the irony persists, save in small pockets of the globe where water is finally getting its due. The debate between ‘inalienable rights to natural resources’ rages alongside free- market valuations of the commodity. Between these poles, we explore the space where appropriate pricing can make the ‘right to water’ a viable proposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Decline of Tank Irrigation Institutions in South India - a Case of Tamil Nadu
    National Seminr on Water & Culture, Hampi,Bellary Dist TITLE:DECLINE OF TANK IRRIGATION INSTITUTIONS IN SOUTH INDIA - A CASE OF TAMIL NADU V.Gandhiraj Research Scholar, Madras Institute of Development Studies No. 79, Second Main Road, Gandhi Nagar, Adyar, Chennai-600 020 Tamil Nadu Phone: 044-24412589,Fax 022-24910872 email: [email protected] Abstract: The tanks occupy vital role in the irrigation as well as local ecosystem in the semi-arid and regions of South India. Meanwhile, tank provides multiple uses like source of drinking water for uncountable rural and urban communities and livestock, fish culture, recharge of ground water, control of floods etc. However, after the independence the significant source of tank irrigation has drastically decreased due to several socio-economic and institutional factors, particularly the changes in land ownership pattern, caste, class configuration and importance given to canal systems and over exploitation of ground water. At the same time today there is alarm that these valuable and extensive resources are in a state of collapse, contributing to increased drought vulnerability in some of the poorest districts in the country. The main motivation of this paper is to examine the importance of tank irrigation in South India particularly in case of Tamil Nadu and tries to find out why tank irrigation failed in the reign and how to improve this precious irrigation system. The paper also makes an effort to recommend policy guideline measures to revive tank irrigation in south India. The study is based on a critical reading of tank irrigation literature and available secondary data. DECLINE OF TANK IRRIGATION INSTITUTIONS IN SOUTH INDIA - A CASE OF TAMIL NADU Full paper Tank irrigation is one of the oldest and significant sources of irrigation in India and is particularly in south India (Palanisamy, 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • National Infrastructure Pipeline
    National Infrastructure Pipeline Report of the Task Force Department of Economic Affairs Ministry of Finance Government of India Volume II 1 2 Contents Infrastructure Progress 20 Sector Progress, Deficits and Challenges, Vision and Reforms 23 General Reforms 174 Financial Sector Reforms 188 Infrastructure Financing 206 Business Models 230 Financing the NIP 244 Way Forward 248 Annexure 254 3 List of Figures Figure 1 Year-wise investment trend in infrastructure (Rs lakh crore, FY13-17, FY 18E and FY 19E) 21 Figure 2 Share of infrastructure investment by the Centre, states and private sector 21 Figure 3 Power sector investment (Rs lakh crore) and share in total infrastructure investment (%) 24 Figure 4 Trends in power generation capacity (GW) and per capita electricity consumption in India (kWh) 25 Figure 5 Trend in power transmission lines in India (ckm) 25 Figure 6 Length of natural gas pipeline in India (in km) 27 Figure 7 CGD bidding rounds snapshot 27 Figure 8 Per capita consumption (kWh/ person) 29 Figure 9 Share of fossil fuel in electricity generation (%) 29 Figure 10 Electricity distribution losses (%) 29 Figure 11 Gas consumption by different sectors (in MMSCMD) 30 Figure 12 Roads sector infrastructure investment (Rs lakh crore) and share in total infrastructure investment (%) 46 Figure 13 Trend in road network in India (lakh km) 46 Figure 14 Achievement targets set by MoRTH 47 Figure 15 Road connectivity (Score: 1 - 100) 49 Figure 16 Quality of road infrastructure (Score: 1 – 7) 49 Figure 17 Railways infrastructure investment (Rs
    [Show full text]
  • Irrigation and Water Use Efficiency in South Asia
    Irrigation and Water Use Efficiency in South Asia Ali Hasanain1, Shahid Ahmad2, Muhammad Zia Mehmood3, Sidra Majeed4, and Genet Zinabou5,6 South Asia is one of the world’s most densely populated and poorest regions, but also the region with the highest rates of irrigated agriculture. Increasingly, the region’s water resources are becoming stressed through population growth coupled with poor management. This paper reviews the water policy experiences of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan and the Maldives, and documents important differences and many commonalities in these practices. It then discusses the theory of water pricing in centrally managed as well as market irrigation systems. Often, the proposed solution to the lack of water use efficiency is to prescribe the adoption of better technical solutions. We review some of these in an appendix. The paper also summarizes the problems of water use, discusses obstacles to solving these issues, elaborates on policy options that are realistic in the given context, and the obstacles to the implementation of even these more realistic policy options. We conclude that water does not exist in a vacuum: while better policies can make a difference, more efficient management of water ultimately requires the state to play a strong supporting role to farmers, and any public service delivery improvement is in South Asia, as elsewhere, contingent on deep and sustained political reforms. 1 Lahore University of Management Sciences 2 Pakistan Agricultural Research Council 3 Lahore University of Management Sciences 4 Pakistan Agricultural Research Council 5 Global Development Network 6 We would like to thank Minahil Zafar, Danya Arif and Maha Rehman for excellent research support.
    [Show full text]
  • Micro-Irrigation: an Efficient Technology for India's Sustainable
    Kalpa Publications in Civil Engineering Volume 1, 2017, Pages 398{402 ICRISET2017. International Conference on Re- search and Innovations in Science, Engineering &Technology. Selected papers in Civil Engineering Micro-Irrigation: An Efficient Technology for India’s Sustainable Agricultural Growth Dr. Khadeeja Priyan1,2 and Ratansharan Panchal1,2 1 Department of Civil Engineering 2 G H Patel College of Engineering & Technology, Vallabh Vidyanagar, India. [email protected], [email protected] Abstract India being an agrarian country, the present and future challenges of agricultural demand due to population increase can be met by technological innovations for sustainable agriculture. Indian agriculture beset with water scarcity and becomes less remunerative and uncertain. Since water being a precious resource for agriculture, every drop of water available for irrigation is significant for overall farm efficiency. Hence there is prudent and paramount need for efficient use of the available water and micro- irrigation is one such innovative technology. Economic return is very important for the adoption of any new technology. Economic return with more engineering approaches to keep water productivity more relevant in economic considerations [1]. Raising the physical productivity of water in crops without due considerations to economics will not have much relevance to small farmers in developing countries [2]. This paper assesses the current status and technologies of micro-irrigation and evaluating the future prospects of micro-irrigation adoption in India. The rationale of the paper is to appraise micro-irrigation as an innovative technology for sustainable agriculture in India and its significant impact on water productivity and land productivity. 1 Introduction Water is a scarce natural resource and the major requirement of water is in agricultural sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Zuari Agro Chemicals Ltd
    October 3, 2018 Zuari Agro Chemicals Ltd. Integrated solution provider for farmers… CMP INR 243 Target: INR 400 Initiating Coverage: Buy Key Share Data Company Background Zuari Agro Chemicals Ltd. (Zuari), a part of Adventz Group of Mr Saroj Poddar (originally Face Value (INR) 10.0 promoted by Late K.K. Birla in 1967), is amongst India‘s largest pure-play fertilizer companies Equity Capital (INR Mn) 420.6 on a consolidated basis, manufacturing Urea, DAP, NPK and other complex fertilizers. Its eight Market Cap (INR mn) 10220.1 plants are located in Goa, Maharashtra, Karnataka (MCFL) and Odhisa (PPL) with an installed capacity of ~3.5 mtpa, sold under ‗Jai Kisaan‘ brand, with pan India presence. It also sells 52 Week High/Low (INR) 689/220 externally sourced products like DAP, SSP, MOP, specialty fertilizers, and other agri inputs like Avg. Daily Volume (BSE) 28,973 pesticides, seeds and micro-nutrients, through its extensive retail distribution network. It BSE Code 534742 acquired Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilisers Ltd. (MCFL) in 2015. It also owns 40% in its associate Paradeep Phosphates Ltd (PPL), Odhisa. NSE Code ZUARI Investment Rationale Reuters Code ZUAR.NS India’s largest private player in complex fertilizers with strong brand recall and robust Bloomberg Code ZUAC:IN distribution network Shareholding Pattern (Jun 30, 2018) Zuari Group (Zuari, MCFL, PPL) is the largest private complex fertilizer manufacturer in India. It is the largest Water Soluble Fertiliser (WSF) maker with 24% market share and fourth largest private DAP manufacturer with 16% market share. Its robust distribution network comprising of ~8,000 dealers and ~75,000 sub-dealers nationwide with access to ~23 mn farmers, helped Zuari Group retain its industry leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • Pampered Views and Parrot Talks: in the Cause of Well Irrigation in India
    Pampered Views and Parrot Talks: In the Cause of Well Irrigation in India M. Dinesh Kumar 1 and MVK Sivamohan 2 ABSTRACT The paper reveals some of the fallacies in Indian irrigation. They are as follows. Groundwater is a democratic resource; access to well irrigation is more equitable than canals; well irrigation is more productive than canal irrigation and therefore is superior to canal irrigation. Surface irrigation is becoming increasingly irrelevant in India’s irrigation landscape in spite of growing investments, and therefore future investments in the sector should be diverted for well irrigation. The growth in well irrigation in semi arid regions of India can be sustained by recharging the aquifers using local runoff. Well irrigation can boost agricultural growth and eradicate poverty in water-abundant eastern India. The paper makes the following arguments. The inherent advantages of surface irrigation system over well irrigation such as higher system dependability and the ability to effectively address spatial mismatch in resource availability and demand, means the second is not a substitute for the first. The use of outdated irrigation management concepts which treat “drainage” as waste leads to underassessment of efficiency of surface systems. Sustaining well irrigation in semi arid and arid regions would need “imported surface water” rather than local runoff for recharging. The use of simple statistics of “area irrigated’ to pass judgements about performance of surface irrigation systems is sheer misuse of statistics, as there are complex socio-economic and hydrological processes adversely affecting their performance, which are beyond the institutional capacity of irrigation agencies to control. Well irrigation alone cannot boost agricultural growth and reduce poverty in eastern India as the region has very low per capita arable land, and offers low marginal returns from irrigation owing to high humidity and rainfall.
    [Show full text]
  • Morning Notes Date: 18.02.2013
    Morning Notes Date: 18.02.2013 For Internal circulation only GRAPH GLOBAL NEWS Singapore’s January Exports Rise Less Than Estimated on Drugs Singapore’s exports rose less than estimated in January as manufacturers shipped fewer electronics and pharmaceutical goods. Non-oil domestic exports gained 0.5 KEY INDICES percent from a year earlier, after a 16.3 percent drop in Indian Markets December, the trade promotion agency said in a statement today. The median of 11 estimates in a Bloomberg News Index Close Pt. Chg. Change % survey was for a 3 percent increase. “It’s still looking a little bit subdued” outside of China, Euben Paracuelles, an S&P CNX NIFTY 5887.40 -9.55 -0.16 economist at Nomura Holdings Inc. in Singapore, said CNX NIFTY JUNIOR 11871.35 +26.95 0.23 before the report. The U.S. economy is still weak and CNX 100 5798.10 -5.95 -0.10 Europe remains in a recession, he said. S&P CNX DEFTY 3774.10 -18.80 -0.50 Yen Weakens After G-20 Refrains From Censuring Japan S&P CNX 500 4647.25 -3.10 -0.07 CNX MIDCAP 7925.20 +29.85 0.38 The yen fell against the dollar, extending losses that made it the worst-performing major currency in the past three NIFTY MIDCAP 50 2152.25 +12.45 0.58 months, after the Group of 20 refrained from censuring SENSEX 19468.55 -29.03 -0.15 Japanese policies driving the decline. The final G-20 communique released in Moscow on the weekend fell short Global Markets of last week’s Group-of-Seven statement and means recent trends in major currencies are now set to resume, Morgan Index Close Pt.
    [Show full text]
  • 30 Days of Rainfall, Compared and Management of Water
    44376 THE WORLD BANK INDIA’S WATER ECONOMY Bracing for a Turbulent Future INDIA’S WATER ECONOMY Public Disclosure Authorized India faces an unsure water future. Unless fresh policies are adopted and implemented to make water development and management sustainable, India will have neither the means to maintain and build BRACING FOR A TURBULENT FUTURE new infrastructure, nor the water required for its survival. This report focuses on two basic issues—the major water-related challenges facing India, and the critical measures required to address them. It calls for a reinvigorated set of public water institutions to sustain I water development and management in India. The study: ECONOMY WATER NDIA’S • examines the evolution of water management in India • describes the achievements of the past • analyses the challenges ahead • suggests ways of evolving a sustainable water management system Public Disclosure Authorized Drawing heavily on background documents by eminent Indian practitioners and policy analysts, it explores various options of managing the transition from past practices in a principled and John Briscoe • R.P.S. Malik pragmatic manner. BRACING FOR A TURBULENT FUTURE The report will be essential for practitioners in the fields of water management, development, and economics. It may prove useful for policymakers, government agencies, NGOs, journalists, and general readers interested in India’s water economy. John Briscoe is currently World Bank Country Director for Brazil. Previously, he was Senior Water Advisor with responsibility for the Bank’s water portfolio both globally and in South Asia. Public Disclosure Authorized R.P.S. Malik currently works with the Agricultural Economics Research Centre, University of Delhi.
    [Show full text]