Wildwood Recreation Site Brochure
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Oregon Historic Trails Report Book (1998)
i ,' o () (\ ô OnBcox HrsroRrc Tnans Rpponr ô o o o. o o o o (--) -,J arJ-- ö o {" , ã. |¡ t I o t o I I r- L L L L L (- Presented by the Oregon Trails Coordinating Council L , May,I998 U (- Compiled by Karen Bassett, Jim Renner, and Joyce White. Copyright @ 1998 Oregon Trails Coordinating Council Salem, Oregon All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Printed in the United States of America. Oregon Historic Trails Report Table of Contents Executive summary 1 Project history 3 Introduction to Oregon's Historic Trails 7 Oregon's National Historic Trails 11 Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail I3 Oregon National Historic Trail. 27 Applegate National Historic Trail .41 Nez Perce National Historic Trail .63 Oregon's Historic Trails 75 Klamath Trail, 19th Century 17 Jedediah Smith Route, 1828 81 Nathaniel Wyeth Route, t83211834 99 Benjamin Bonneville Route, 1 833/1 834 .. 115 Ewing Young Route, 1834/1837 .. t29 V/hitman Mission Route, 184l-1847 . .. t4t Upper Columbia River Route, 1841-1851 .. 167 John Fremont Route, 1843 .. 183 Meek Cutoff, 1845 .. 199 Cutoff to the Barlow Road, 1848-1884 217 Free Emigrant Road, 1853 225 Santiam Wagon Road, 1865-1939 233 General recommendations . 241 Product development guidelines 243 Acknowledgements 241 Lewis & Clark OREGON National Historic Trail, 1804-1806 I I t . .....¡.. ,r la RivaÌ ï L (t ¡ ...--."f Pðiräldton r,i " 'f Route description I (_-- tt |". -
Sh Ood R Iver & W Asco C Ounties
2019-20 COLUMBIA GORGE S D AY & WEEKEND TRIPS- O REGON' S HOOD RIVER & WASCO COUNTIES TY HORSETAIL FALLS LOOP HIKE PANORAMA POINT VIENTO STATE PARK Along the scenic highway, adjacent to Oneonta Falls. Located South on Hwy 35 - It is part of Mt. Hood 541-374-8811 Also, take the 2.6-mile trail up to Pony Tail Falls. Loop Tour. I-84 west, Exit 56 • Hood River INDIAN CREEK GOLF COURSE See the area’s finest views of the Hood River Valley’s Trailheads and popular campgrounds in the forest. Hood River productive fruit industry, beautiful forests and VISTA HOUSE AT CROWN POINT 541-386-7770 majestic Mt Hood. Each season offers a different Corbett picture, from colorful spring blossoms through fall’s Friends of Vista House - year-round The 18-hole course features three meandering 503-695-2230 - rich colors and winter whites. Buses welcomed. 503-695-2240 - Gift Shop & Espresso Bar - creeks and views of Mt Hood and Mt Adams. THINGS TO DO PORT MARINA PARK spring thru fall KOBERG BEACH Mid-March thru October 9am-6pm daily t Hood River Off I-84 just east of Hood River 541-386-1645 November thru mid-March 10am-4pm Fri-Sun, weather e 1-800-551-6949 • 541-374-8811 • 503-695-2261 permitting Accessed westbound I-84 only. One of the windsurfers’ gathering spots in Hood River, No admission fee - donations gratefully accepted it’s the “Sailboarding Capital of the World.” Popular Scenic picnic and rest area. Built in 1917, Vista House is perched 733 feet LARCH MOUNTAIN windsurfing and viewing site, swimming beach, picnic above the Columbia Gorge and is also a visitor shelter, exercise course and jogging trail, and center featuring a 360-degree view of the river Travel 14 miles up Larch Mountain Rd from the scenic concessions. -
Wildwood Footbridge Maintenance EA and FONSI
Wildwood Footbridge Maintenance Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Environmental Assessment Number OR 080-08-11 June 2008 United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Oregon State Office Salem District Cascade Resource Area Township 2 South, Range 7 East, Section 31, Willamette Meridian Salmon River Watershed Clackamas County, Oregon Responsible Agency: USDI - Bureau of Land Management Responsible Official: Cindy Enstrom, Field Manager Cascades Resource Area 1717 Fabry Road SE Salem, OR 97306 (503) 315-5969 For further information, contact: Zach Jarrett, Project Lead Cascades Resource Area 1717 Fabry Road SE Salem, OR 97306 (503) 375-5610 As the Nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering economic use of our land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places, and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to assure that their development is in the best interest of all people. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in Island Territories under U.S. administration. BLM/OR/WA/GI-08/062+1792 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................7 -
Timing of In-Water Work to Protect Fish and Wildlife Resources
OREGON GUIDELINES FOR TIMING OF IN-WATER WORK TO PROTECT FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES June, 2008 Purpose of Guidelines - The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, (ODFW), “The guidelines are to assist under its authority to manage Oregon’s fish and wildlife resources has updated the following guidelines for timing of in-water work. The guidelines are to assist the the public in minimizing public in minimizing potential impacts to important fish, wildlife and habitat potential impacts...”. resources. Developing the Guidelines - The guidelines are based on ODFW district fish “The guidelines are based biologists’ recommendations. Primary considerations were given to important fish species including anadromous and other game fish and threatened, endangered, or on ODFW district fish sensitive species (coded list of species included in the guidelines). Time periods were biologists’ established to avoid the vulnerable life stages of these fish including migration, recommendations”. spawning and rearing. The preferred work period applies to the listed streams, unlisted upstream tributaries, and associated reservoirs and lakes. Using the Guidelines - These guidelines provide the public a way of planning in-water “These guidelines provide work during periods of time that would have the least impact on important fish, wildlife, and habitat resources. ODFW will use the guidelines as a basis for the public a way of planning commenting on planning and regulatory processes. There are some circumstances where in-water work during it may be appropriate to perform in-water work outside of the preferred work period periods of time that would indicated in the guidelines. ODFW, on a project by project basis, may consider variations in climate, location, and category of work that would allow more specific have the least impact on in-water work timing recommendations. -
Analyzing Dam Feasibility in the Willamette River Watershed
Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses Spring 6-8-2017 Analyzing Dam Feasibility in the Willamette River Watershed Alexander Cameron Nagel Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Geography Commons, Hydrology Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Nagel, Alexander Cameron, "Analyzing Dam Feasibility in the Willamette River Watershed" (2017). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 4012. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.5896 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Analyzing Dam Feasibility in the Willamette River Watershed by Alexander Cameron Nagel A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geography Thesis Committee: Heejun Chang, Chair Geoffrey Duh Paul Loikith Portland State University 2017 i Abstract This study conducts a dam-scale cost versus benefit analysis in order to explore the feasibility of each the 13 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) commissioned dams in Oregon’s Willamette River network. Constructed between 1941 and 1969, these structures function in collaboration to comprise the Willamette River Basin Reservoir System (WRBRS). The motivation for this project derives from a growing awareness of the biophysical impacts that dam structures can have on riparian habitats. This project compares each of the 13 dams being assessed, to prioritize their level of utility within the system. -
1 the Villages at Mt. Hood
1 The Villages at Mt. Hood Visitors enjoy fishing, camping, boating, hiking, hunting, mountain biking, skiing and other snow sports in the winter. Popular destinations include Timberline Lodge and Ski Resort, Lost Lake, Trillium Lake, Rock Creek Reservoir and portions of the Old Oregon Trail. In addition, Mt. Hood offers two other major ski resorts, Ski Bowl and Mt. Hood Meadows. Preserving the pristine nature of Mt. Hood is important to Oregon’s environment, identity and collective legacy. The project area includes communities along the US 26 corridor in Clackamas County, Oregon in the vicinity of Mt. Hood. The major populated areas include the communities of Brightwood, Welches/Wemme, Zig Zag, and Rhododendron. Together, these areas are recognized as The Villages at Mt. Hood. The Villages at Mount Hood are home to over 5,000 permanent residents and 15,000 seasonal residents. The surrounding area serves thousands of recreational users every year—estimated at over 85,000 to the Mt. Hood area. Residents and visitors alike enjoy the area’s Who lives in the Villages? beauty and recreational opportunities. 4.5% of population are youths (10-19) US 26 is the primary travel route connecting the 18.9% of population are older adults (65+) communities, and local roads serve important 8.1% of population are low-income circulation needs. US 26 is classified as a state 10.2% of population have an ambulatory highway and National Freight Route, and is part disability of the National Highway System (NHS). This 98.6% of population identify as White, 1.4% high-volume section of US 26 connects the identify as two or more races Portland metropolitan area with Central Oregon. -
Far West Region
CHAPTER FIVE Far West Region California, Oregon, Washington, Alaska, Nevada, Idaho, Pacific Islands North 0 100 200 Kilometers 0 100 200 Miles WASHINGTON OREGON IDAHO NEVADA ALASKA CALIFORNIA HAWAII United States Territories AMERICAN SAMOA GUAM Faces and Places of Cooperative Conservation 113 COOPERATIVE CONSERVATION CASE STUDY California Tribal Partnerships PHOTO BY KEN WILSON Traditional Native American Values Support Forest Management Location: California Project Summary: A unique blend of traditional Native American practices and today’s science preserves native customs and contributes to forest health. Children practice indigenous basket weaving techniques at a camp in California that sustains traditional cultural practices. Resource Challenge working with weavers, volunteers manage forests for future Over thousands of years, native peoples learned to manage the land, basketry materials, thinning heavy fuels and building fi re breaks using practices such as controlled burns to create a healthy landscape. to prepare for Forest Service controlled burns. More than 500 The USDA Forest Service in California is consulting and collaborating participants have volunteered 2,800 hours, saving $25,000 in with tribes on more than 50 projects. Several are government-to- taxpayer dollars. The National Advisory Council on Historic government agreements, with both entities pledging to cooperatively Preservation and the Governor of California have both awarded protect and restore the ecological health of land. Restoring and the project for enhancing traditional forest management in sustaining culturally important plants and re-introducing fi re as a tool California. for forest renewal are two of the primary objectives. • The Maidu Cultural Development Group Stewardship Project (MCDG) Examples of Key Partners is integrating traditional land practices with modern resource USDA Forest Service, Karuk Indigenous Weavers, California Indian management on 2,100 acres of the Plumas National Forest. -
Workshop 1 Meeting Summary
Vision Around the Mountain – Workshop 1 Meeting Summary Thursday, October 29, 2020 Stakeholders Present Name Affiliation Andrea Breault Cascades East Transit Jay Higgins City of Gresham Andi Howell City of Sandy Jordan Wheeler City of Sandy Brett Setterfield Clackamas County Karen Buehrig Clackamas County Ken Humberston Clackamas County Paul Savas Clackamas County Lizzie Keenan Clackamas County Tourism and Cultural Affairs Patricia Fink Columbia Area Transit Emily Reed Columbia Gorge Tourism Alliance David Duncan Grey Line of Portland, Big Pink Sightseeing Kathy Fitzpatrick Mid-Columbia Economic Development District Kristina Babcock Mount Hood Express Teresa Christopherson Mount Hood Express Greg Pack Mount Hood Meadows Samara Phelps Mt. Hood Territory Nathan Clark Multnomah County Valerie Egon Multnomah Falls Shuttle Maria Sipin Oregon Department of Transportation Rian Windsheimer Oregon Department of Transportation Terra Lingley Oregon Department of Transportation Theresa Conley Oregon Department of Transportation Olga Kaganova Port of Cascade Locks Megan Ramey Region 1 Area Commission on Transportation John Whitman Ride Connection Greg Leo The Leo Company Jon Tullis Timberline Lodge Eve Nilenders TriMet Seth English-Young United States Department of Transportation Bill Westbrook United States Forest Service Claire Fernandes United States Forest Service Kristin Austin United States Forest Service Scott Kaden United States Forest Service 1 Ashley Huckaby May Visit Hood River Project Team Present Name Affiliation Jason Kelly Oregon Department of Transportation Kristen Stallman Oregon Department of Transportation Scott Bricker Travel Oregon Stephanie Wright Nelson\Nygaard Kyle Taniguchi Nelson\Nygaard Layne Wyse Nelson\Nygaard Bryan Blanc Nelson\Nygaard Penny Mabie EnviroIssues Cristina Arias EnviroIssues Max Farbman EnviroIssues Susan Hayman EnviroIssues Kristin Dahl Crosscurrent Collective Meeting Opening Facilitator Penny Mabie (EnviroIssues) welcomed participants and asked them to take a poll on the following question: What is your favorite Mt. -
CLACKAMAS COUNTY, OREGON and INCORPORATED AREAS Volume 3 of 3 Clackamas County
CLACKAMAS COUNTY, OREGON AND INCORPORATED AREAS Volume 3 of 3 Clackamas County Community Community Name Number BARLOW, CITY OF 410013 CANBY, CITY OF 410014 DAMASCUS, CITY OF 410006 *ESTACADA, CITY OF 410016 GLADSTONE, CITY OF 410017 HAPPY VALLEY, CITY OF 410026 *JOHNSON CITY, CITY OF 410267 LAKE OSWEGO, CITY OF 410018 MILWAUKIE, CITY OF 410019 *MOLALLA, CITY OF 410020 OREGON CITY, CITY OF 410021 RIVERGROVE, CITY OF 410022 SANDY, CITY OF 410023 WEST LINN, CITY OF 410024 WILSONVILLE, CITY OF 410025 CLACKAMAS COUNTY 415588 (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) *No Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified REVISED: JANUARY 18, 2019 Reprinted with corrections on December 6, 2019 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 41005CV003B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Initial Countywide Effective Date: June 17, 2008 Revised Countywide Date: January 18, 2019 This FIS report was reissued on December 6, 2019 to make corrections; this version replaces any previous versions. -
SANDY RIVER PARK Master Plan
SANDY RIVER PARK Master Plan City of Sandy, Oregon July 2011 ‘GATEWAY TO MT. HOOD’ Sandy River Park Master Plan 1 ‘GATEWAY TO MT. HOOD’ 1515 SE Water Avenue, Suite 100 39250 Pioneer Boulevard Portland, Oregon 97214 Sandy, OR 97055 (503) 224-9560 503-668-5569 (phone) www.grpmack.com 503-668-5891 (fax) GM Project Number: 2090278.00 www.cityofsandy.com 2 Sandy River Park Master Plan ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CITY OF SANDY TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Nancy Ream Enabnit, Community Services Director Melanie Atkinson, Bornstedt Village Resident Seth Atkinson, Finance Director Byron Ball, Sandy High School Environmental Sciences Tracy Brown, Planning Director Chris Cohen, Sandy High School Student Liz French-Storn, Engineering Technician Jason Dumont, The Nature Conservancy Steve Gillis, Parks Maintenance Kate Holleran, Metro Joe Knapp, Network Administrator Vicky Mills, Sandy Mountain Festival Scott Lazenby, City Administrator Shannon Montgomery, Sandy Mountain Festival Linda Malone, Mayor Russ Plaeger, Sandy River Basin Watershed Council Joe Preston, Parks Superintendent Kathleen Walker, US Forest Service Mike Walker, Public Works Director CONSULTANT TEAM GROUP MACKENZIE Dan Jenkins, ASLA, LEED AP Jenny Richmond, ASLA, LEED AP Tommy King, ASLA Ralph Henderson, PE, LEED AP Megan Goplin, EIT, LEED AP JIM SLAGLE RECREATIONAL TRAILS Jim Slagle, Trail Planner Sandy River Park Master Plan 3 This page intentionally left blank. 4 Sandy River Park Master Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................7 2.0 SITE BACKGROUND -
OFR 2004-7, a Self-Guided Tour of the Geology of the Columbia River
A Self-Guided Tour of the Geology of the Columbia River Gorge— Portland Airport to Skamania Lodge, RESOURCES Stevenson, Washington by David K. Norman and Jaretta M. Roloff WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Open File Report 2004-7 March 2004 NATURAL trip location DISCLAIMER Neither the State of Washington, nor any agency thereof, nor any of their em- ployees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any informa- tion, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or other- wise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the State of Washington or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the State of Washington or any agency thereof. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Doug Sutherland—Commissioner of Public Lands DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Ron Teissere—State Geologist David K. Norman—Assistant State Geologist Washington Department of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Earth Resources PO Box 47007 Olympia, WA 98504-7007 Phone: 360-902-1450 Fax: 360-902-1785 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.dnr.wa.gov/geology/ Cover photo: Looking east up the Columbia River Gorge from the Women’s Forum Overlook. Crown Point and its Vista House are visible on top of the cliff on the right side of the river. -
Lower Columbia Chum
Oregon Native Fish Status Report – Volume II Lower Columbia Chum Existing Populations This SMU consists of seven historic populations which are extinct (Table 85). This conclusion is supported by spawning surveys from the past several years. Ollerenshaw (2001) reported on chum spawner surveys from throughout the lower Columbia from the Youngs to the Columbia River Gorge tributaries. In 2001, after 79 surveys in 27 streams, no live or dead chum, and no chum redds were observed. In 2000, only one chum was observed in the South Fork Klaskanine River, and in 1999, more limited sampling yielded two live chum and one dead chum. A limited number of chum are captured at the Big Creek hatchery trap each year. Between 1990 and 2004, zero to 27 fish have been trapped annually. It has been proposed that recent chum returns to Oregon tributaries are simply stray chum returning as part of healthier runs to Washington tributaries to the lower Columbia. Loss or severe degradation of estuarine and lower river habitat has been implicated as a major cause for the extinction of chum runs in the lower Columbia River tributaries of Oregon. Table 85. Population list and existence status for the Lower Columbia Chum SMU. Exist Population Description No Youngs Youngs Bay tributaries. No Big Big Creek basin plus other Columbia River tributaries from Mill to (and including) Hunt Creek. No Clatskanie Clatskanie River basin plus Columbia River tributaries downstream to include Plympton Creek and upstream to include Beaver Creek. No Scappoose Scappoose Creek basin plus Columbia River tributaries downstream to Goble Creek and upstream to mouth of Willamette River.