DOCSLIB.ORG

Workshop 1 Meeting Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Workshop 1 Meeting Summary Vision Around the Mountain – Workshop 1 Meeting Summary Thursday, October 29, 2020 Stakeholders Present Name Affiliation Andrea Breault Cascades East Transit Jay Higgins City of Gresham Andi Howell City of Sandy Jordan Wheeler City of Sandy Brett Setterfield Clackamas County Karen Buehrig Clackamas County Ken Humberston Clackamas County Paul Savas Clackamas County Lizzie Keenan Clackamas County Tourism and Cultural Affairs Patricia Fink Columbia Area Transit Emily Reed Columbia Gorge Tourism Alliance David Duncan Grey Line of Portland, Big Pink Sightseeing Kathy Fitzpatrick Mid-Columbia Economic Development District Kristina Babcock Mount Hood Express Teresa Christopherson Mount Hood Express Greg Pack Mount Hood Meadows Samara Phelps Mt. Hood Territory Nathan Clark Multnomah County Valerie Egon Multnomah Falls Shuttle Maria Sipin Oregon Department of Transportation Rian Windsheimer Oregon Department of Transportation Terra Lingley Oregon Department of Transportation Theresa Conley Oregon Department of Transportation Olga Kaganova Port of Cascade Locks Megan Ramey Region 1 Area Commission on Transportation John Whitman Ride Connection Greg Leo The Leo Company Jon Tullis Timberline Lodge Eve Nilenders TriMet Seth English-Young United States Department of Transportation Bill Westbrook United States Forest Service Claire Fernandes United States Forest Service Kristin Austin United States Forest Service Scott Kaden United States Forest Service 1 Ashley Huckaby May Visit Hood River Project Team Present Name Affiliation Jason Kelly Oregon Department of Transportation Kristen Stallman Oregon Department of Transportation Scott Bricker Travel Oregon Stephanie Wright Nelson\Nygaard Kyle Taniguchi Nelson\Nygaard Layne Wyse Nelson\Nygaard Bryan Blanc Nelson\Nygaard Penny Mabie EnviroIssues Cristina Arias EnviroIssues Max Farbman EnviroIssues Susan Hayman EnviroIssues Kristin Dahl Crosscurrent Collective Meeting Opening Facilitator Penny Mabie (EnviroIssues) welcomed participants and asked them to take a poll on the following question: What is your favorite Mt. Hood activity? Responses included: Skiing Nordic skiing after work with my wife Scenic driving Carving fresh tracks after a snowstorm at Swimming in Trillium Lake Mt. Hood Meadows or Timberline Fly fishing Hiking the Timberline trail! Snowshoeing Skiing downhill or cross-country at one of Sitting in Adirondack chairs at Timberline the many resorts or trails on/near the Hunting for mushrooms mountain Full moon winter cross-country skiing Chilling at the lakes missions with husband and friends Hiking with family Enjoying a beer at The Gorge White Shredding the pow House Camping at Trillium Lake / having a Cabin retreat with friends bourbon at Timberline Lodge and A beer at the Mazot on a sunny ski day at watching skiers fall down Mt. Hood Meadows! Hiking Mushroom hunting by the Salmon, Tubing Sandy, or Zig Zag rivers Visiting Wildwood Recreation Site A sunny day of downhill skiing at Mt. Climbing the Hogsback Hood Meadows, followed by dinner at Cabin retreats, skiing, and snowmobiling Cooper Spur! 2 Jason Kelly (Oregon Department of Transportation, ODOT) also welcomed participants and introduced himself as the project leader for Vision Around the Mountain (VAM). He explained that the meeting would focus on idea generation about what a regional transit vision around Mt. Hood should look like. He then walked participants through the following agenda: Introductions Overview of Vision Around the Mountain Preliminary feedback from stakeholders Inspirational case studies Breakout sessions o Transit operations o Policy, governance and funding o Visitor engagement and marketing Summary of breakout room conversations Next steps and wrap up Kelly then thanked project partners, noting that the Federal Highway Administration’s Western Federal Lands Highway Division provided grant funding for the project, that Clackamas County, the City of Sandy, and Columbia Area Transit are co-sponsors of the project, and that Travel Oregon is a strategic partner in the project. He also explained that the project has a technical advisory committee that provides technical review of information and project activities. He noted that this committee is composed of the aforementioned partners along with the United States Forest Service. Kelly then laid out guiding principles for the day’s workshop: Be creative & ambitious – Be architects of the future. Practice outcomes-oriented thinking – Focus on the end goal, not the incremental steps it will take to get there. Collaboration – Work as a team that is planning regionally but acting locally. Celebrate past successes – Honor past efforts and commitments by refining them for a prosperous future. Introductions Participants were split up into breakout rooms and given the chance to introduce themselves to other workshop participants. Overview of Vision Around the Mountain Chronology of Transit Jason Kelly (ODOT) provided an overview of the VAM project. He started by providing a quick chronology of what has happened with public transit in the Mt. Hood area over the last decade: 2013: The Mountain Express begins providing service from Portland through Sandy to Rhododendron. 3 2014: Clackamas County Social Services renames the Mountain Express to the Mt. Hood Express and expands service to Timberline Lodge. This provides the first multimodal connection from the Portland metro area to Mt. Hood. 2016: The Oregon Department of Transportation partners with the Oregon Parks and Recreation Department, the U.S. Forest Service and others to pilot a seasonal bus service from Portland to Multnomah Falls called the Columbia Gorge Express. 2018: The Columbia Gorge Express extends service year-round and adds Cascade Locks and Hood River to the route. Mt. Hood Meadows also implements a seasonal shuttle on Highway 35 from Hood River to Mt. Hood Meadows. Timberline Lodge implements a shuttle from Government Camp to Timberline Lodge. 2019: Columbia Area Transit assumes operational control of Columbia Gorge Express intercity service and adds the Gorge to Mountain line – a seasonal service from Hood River to Mt. Hood. 2020 and beyond: Cascades East Transit is collaborating with the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs to provide a shuttle from Warm Springs to Government Camp. Kelly noted that in addition to the public programs listed in this chronology, there are also other private operators providing connections from the Portland metro area and Central Oregon to Mt. Hood. What’s Going to Happen in the Future? Kelly explained that transit around Mt. Hood has come to a critical moment where stakeholders need to work together to create a unified vision and a regional strategy. He noted that this is the goal of the VAM project. He then laid out the primary project outcomes: 1. A long-term regional transit vision that partners can use to guide future operations. 2. Priorities, strategies, and projects that support this vision and can be categorized into short, medium, or long-term groupings. 3. A framework for action focused on: a. Operations b. Policy, governance and funding c. Visitor engagement and marketing 4. Implementation sponsors who are positioned to work towards achieving the vision and task teams who will carry the work forward after this project is finished. 5. A list of strategies and projects listed in the Mt. Hood Multimodal Transportation Plan. How Will We Get There? Kelly noted that for the vision to be implemented, it needs broad regional support. For that reason, the project team wanted to bring together all the stakeholders for this series of four workshops to shape the vision. He then laid out the topics and timeline for the four workshops: Workshop 1 “Visioning” (October 2020): Generate ideas of what the vision should look like. Workshop 2 “Towards a Vision” (December 2020): Look at the vision defined in the first workshop along with the existing and planned resources available. Determine what additional resources will be needed to achieve the vision and how those resources can be obtained. Workshop 3 “Framework for Action” (February 2021): Identify action areas, strategies and projects to achieve the vision and categorize them as short-, medium-, or long-term. 4 Workshop 4 “Bringing it All Together” (April 2021): Bring all the conversations together to create a framework for implementation. Preliminary Feedback from Stakeholders Stephanie Wright (Nelson\Nygaard) summarized some of the results of a survey that was open to stakeholders in late summer 2020 and asked for their opinions on the existing conditions of the transit system in the region. Wright first explained that the most popular words that came to mind for stakeholders when asked to describe the current transit system were “incomplete” and “confusing.” She also presented the results from the question: What markets should the 2030 network focus on serving? She explained that “Tourists and recreational users” and “Employees” were the top markets while survey respondents considered “People with limited access to a vehicle” and “Local and regional trips for residents” as less important markets. Wright noted that there will be a tension between providing service to local and regional trips compared to longer haul trips from the Portland metro area. Wright also showed respondents’ ranking of priorities for transit, which was as follows: 1. Roadway and Parking Congestion Reduction 2. Access to Key Destinations 3. Supports Economic Development and Community Vitality 4. Improved
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oregon Historic Trails Report Book (1998)
    i ,' o () (\ ô OnBcox HrsroRrc Tnans Rpponr ô o o o. o o o o (--) -,J arJ-- ö o {" , ã. |¡ t I o t o I I r- L L L L L (- Presented by the Oregon Trails Coordinating Council L , May,I998 U (- Compiled by Karen Bassett, Jim Renner, and Joyce White. Copyright @ 1998 Oregon Trails Coordinating Council Salem, Oregon All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Printed in the United States of America. Oregon Historic Trails Report Table of Contents Executive summary 1 Project history 3 Introduction to Oregon's Historic Trails 7 Oregon's National Historic Trails 11 Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail I3 Oregon National Historic Trail. 27 Applegate National Historic Trail .41 Nez Perce National Historic Trail .63 Oregon's Historic Trails 75 Klamath Trail, 19th Century 17 Jedediah Smith Route, 1828 81 Nathaniel Wyeth Route, t83211834 99 Benjamin Bonneville Route, 1 833/1 834 .. 115 Ewing Young Route, 1834/1837 .. t29 V/hitman Mission Route, 184l-1847 . .. t4t Upper Columbia River Route, 1841-1851 .. 167 John Fremont Route, 1843 .. 183 Meek Cutoff, 1845 .. 199 Cutoff to the Barlow Road, 1848-1884 217 Free Emigrant Road, 1853 225 Santiam Wagon Road, 1865-1939 233 General recommendations . 241 Product development guidelines 243 Acknowledgements 241 Lewis & Clark OREGON National Historic Trail, 1804-1806 I I t . .....¡.. ,r la RivaÌ ï L (t ¡ ...--."f Pðiräldton r,i " 'f Route description I (_-- tt |".
    [Show full text]
  • Sh Ood R Iver & W Asco C Ounties
    2019-20 COLUMBIA GORGE S D AY & WEEKEND TRIPS- O REGON' S HOOD RIVER & WASCO COUNTIES TY HORSETAIL FALLS LOOP HIKE PANORAMA POINT VIENTO STATE PARK Along the scenic highway, adjacent to Oneonta Falls. Located South on Hwy 35 - It is part of Mt. Hood 541-374-8811 Also, take the 2.6-mile trail up to Pony Tail Falls. Loop Tour. I-84 west, Exit 56 • Hood River INDIAN CREEK GOLF COURSE See the area’s finest views of the Hood River Valley’s Trailheads and popular campgrounds in the forest. Hood River productive fruit industry, beautiful forests and VISTA HOUSE AT CROWN POINT 541-386-7770 majestic Mt Hood. Each season offers a different Corbett picture, from colorful spring blossoms through fall’s Friends of Vista House - year-round The 18-hole course features three meandering 503-695-2230 - rich colors and winter whites. Buses welcomed. 503-695-2240 - Gift Shop & Espresso Bar - creeks and views of Mt Hood and Mt Adams. THINGS TO DO PORT MARINA PARK spring thru fall KOBERG BEACH Mid-March thru October 9am-6pm daily t Hood River Off I-84 just east of Hood River 541-386-1645 November thru mid-March 10am-4pm Fri-Sun, weather e 1-800-551-6949 • 541-374-8811 • 503-695-2261 permitting Accessed westbound I-84 only. One of the windsurfers’ gathering spots in Hood River, No admission fee - donations gratefully accepted it’s the “Sailboarding Capital of the World.” Popular Scenic picnic and rest area. Built in 1917, Vista House is perched 733 feet LARCH MOUNTAIN windsurfing and viewing site, swimming beach, picnic above the Columbia Gorge and is also a visitor shelter, exercise course and jogging trail, and center featuring a 360-degree view of the river Travel 14 miles up Larch Mountain Rd from the scenic concessions.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildwood Footbridge Maintenance EA and FONSI
    Wildwood Footbridge Maintenance Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Environmental Assessment Number OR 080-08-11 June 2008 United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Oregon State Office Salem District Cascade Resource Area Township 2 South, Range 7 East, Section 31, Willamette Meridian Salmon River Watershed Clackamas County, Oregon Responsible Agency: USDI - Bureau of Land Management Responsible Official: Cindy Enstrom, Field Manager Cascades Resource Area 1717 Fabry Road SE Salem, OR 97306 (503) 315-5969 For further information, contact: Zach Jarrett, Project Lead Cascades Resource Area 1717 Fabry Road SE Salem, OR 97306 (503) 375-5610 As the Nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering economic use of our land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places, and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to assure that their development is in the best interest of all people. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in Island Territories under U.S. administration. BLM/OR/WA/GI-08/062+1792 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Planning for Active Transportation in the Western United States: an Alternative Future for Cache Valley, Utah
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 8-2018 Planning for Active Transportation in the Western United States: An Alternative Future for Cache Valley, Utah Stephanie A. Tomlin Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Environmental Design Commons, and the Landscape Architecture Commons Recommended Citation Tomlin, Stephanie A., "Planning for Active Transportation in the Western United States: An Alternative Future for Cache Valley, Utah" (2018). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 7195. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/7195 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PLANNING FOR ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION IN THE WESTERN UNITED STATES: AN ALTERNATIVE FUTURE FOR CACHE VALLEY, UTAH by Stephanie A. Tomlin A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Bioregional Planning Approved: Bartlett Warren-Kretzschmar, Ph.D. Richard Toth, M.L.A. Major Professor Committee Member Jordy Guth, M.S. Mark R. McLellan, Ph.D. Committee Member Vice President for Research and Dean of the School of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2018 ii Copyright © Stephanie A. Tomlin, 2018 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Planning for Active Transportation in the Western United States: An Alternative Future for Cache Valley, Utah by Stephanie A. Tomlin, Master of Bioregional Planning Utah State University, 2018 Major Professor: Bartlett (Barty) Warren-Kretzschmar, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Corridor Plan
    HOOD RIVER MT HOOD (OR HIGHWAY 35) Corridor Plan Oregon Department of Transportation DOR An Element of the HOOD RIVER-MT. HOOD (OR 35) CORRIDOR PLAN Oregon Department of Transportahon Prepared by: ODOT Region I David Evans and Associates,Inc. Cogan Owens Cogan October 1997 21 October, 1997 STAFF REPORT INTERIM CORRIDOR STRATEGY HOOD RIVER-MT. HOOD (OR HWY 35) CORRIDOR PLAN (INCLUDING HWY 281 AND HWY 282) Proposed Action Endorsement of the Hood River-Mt. Hood (OR HWY 35) Corridor Strategy. The Qregon Bep ent of Transportation (ODOT) has been working wi& Tribal and local governments, transportation service providers, interest groups, statewide agencies and stakeholder committees, and the general public to develop a long-term plan for the Hood River-Mt. Hood (OR HWY 35) Corridor. The Hood River-Mt. Hood Corridor Plan is a long-range (20-year) program for managing all transportation modes within the Oregon Highway 35 corridor from the 1-84 junction to the US 26 junction (see Corridor Map). The first phase of that process has resulted in the attached Interim Com'dor Stvategy. The Interim Corridor Strategy is a critical element of the Hood River- Mt. Hood Corridor Plan. The Corridor Strategy will guide development of the Corridor Plan and Refinement Plans for specific areas and issues within the corridor. Simultaneous with preparation of the Corridor Plan, Transportation System Plans (TSPs) are being prepared for the cities of Hood River and Cascade Locks and for Hood River County. ODOT is contributing staff and financial resources to these efforts, both to ensure coordination between the TSPs and the Corridor Plan and to avoid duplication of efforts, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Summit Ski Area Public Outreach and Stakeholder Engagement Report
    APRIL 2019 SUMMIT SKI AREA DEVELOPMENT VISION PLANNING PROCESS PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT AND STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH REPORT AUTHORED BY: PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT AND STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2. INTRODUCTION TO SUMMIT SKI AREA A. HISTORY AND BACKGROUND 3. PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT AND OUTREACH A. PURPOSE AND APPROACH 4. PARTICIPATING STAKEHOLDERS 5. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND OUTREACH RESULTS A. KEY THEMES AND STAKEHOLDER RECOMMENDATIONS I. BEGINNER EXPERIENCE II. AFFORDABLE HOUSING III. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE IV. ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP V. LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 6. CONCLUSION APRIL 2019 Public Engagement and StakeHolder OutreacH Report 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Summit Ski Area is tHe oldest ski area in tHe Pacific NortHwest and provides some of tHe most accessible beginner skiing and riding terrain in tHe region. In July 2018 tHe lease to operate Summit Ski Area was acquired by J.S.K. and Company, sister company to long-me operator of Timberline Lodge, R.L.K. and Company. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT Company leadersHip Hired Sustainable NortHwest, a regional non-profit specializing in public engagement processes and public lands management, to organize and facilitate a series of stakeHolder mee_ngs. THe purpose of tHe stakeHolder mee_ngs was to gatHer input and ideas tHat may be integrated into tHe development vision for Summit Ski Area. Three stakeholder mee_ngs were held between MarcH 1 and March 7, 2019, and collec_vely brougHt togetHer 76 community leaders, businesses, environmental organiza_ons, and county, state, and federal agency partners. KEY THEMES There are five themes that emerged tHrougH tHe stakeHolder engagement meengs: 1. Beginner Experience 2. Affordable Housing 3. Transporta_on and Infrastructure 4.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Villages at Mt. Hood
    1 The Villages at Mt. Hood Visitors enjoy fishing, camping, boating, hiking, hunting, mountain biking, skiing and other snow sports in the winter. Popular destinations include Timberline Lodge and Ski Resort, Lost Lake, Trillium Lake, Rock Creek Reservoir and portions of the Old Oregon Trail. In addition, Mt. Hood offers two other major ski resorts, Ski Bowl and Mt. Hood Meadows. Preserving the pristine nature of Mt. Hood is important to Oregon’s environment, identity and collective legacy. The project area includes communities along the US 26 corridor in Clackamas County, Oregon in the vicinity of Mt. Hood. The major populated areas include the communities of Brightwood, Welches/Wemme, Zig Zag, and Rhododendron. Together, these areas are recognized as The Villages at Mt. Hood. The Villages at Mount Hood are home to over 5,000 permanent residents and 15,000 seasonal residents. The surrounding area serves thousands of recreational users every year—estimated at over 85,000 to the Mt. Hood area. Residents and visitors alike enjoy the area’s Who lives in the Villages? beauty and recreational opportunities. 4.5% of population are youths (10-19) US 26 is the primary travel route connecting the 18.9% of population are older adults (65+) communities, and local roads serve important 8.1% of population are low-income circulation needs. US 26 is classified as a state 10.2% of population have an ambulatory highway and National Freight Route, and is part disability of the National Highway System (NHS). This 98.6% of population identify as White, 1.4% high-volume section of US 26 connects the identify as two or more races Portland metropolitan area with Central Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • Far West Region
    CHAPTER FIVE Far West Region California, Oregon, Washington, Alaska, Nevada, Idaho, Pacific Islands North 0 100 200 Kilometers 0 100 200 Miles WASHINGTON OREGON IDAHO NEVADA ALASKA CALIFORNIA HAWAII United States Territories AMERICAN SAMOA GUAM Faces and Places of Cooperative Conservation 113 COOPERATIVE CONSERVATION CASE STUDY California Tribal Partnerships PHOTO BY KEN WILSON Traditional Native American Values Support Forest Management Location: California Project Summary: A unique blend of traditional Native American practices and today’s science preserves native customs and contributes to forest health. Children practice indigenous basket weaving techniques at a camp in California that sustains traditional cultural practices. Resource Challenge working with weavers, volunteers manage forests for future Over thousands of years, native peoples learned to manage the land, basketry materials, thinning heavy fuels and building fi re breaks using practices such as controlled burns to create a healthy landscape. to prepare for Forest Service controlled burns. More than 500 The USDA Forest Service in California is consulting and collaborating participants have volunteered 2,800 hours, saving $25,000 in with tribes on more than 50 projects. Several are government-to- taxpayer dollars. The National Advisory Council on Historic government agreements, with both entities pledging to cooperatively Preservation and the Governor of California have both awarded protect and restore the ecological health of land. Restoring and the project for enhancing traditional forest management in sustaining culturally important plants and re-introducing fi re as a tool California. for forest renewal are two of the primary objectives. • The Maidu Cultural Development Group Stewardship Project (MCDG) Examples of Key Partners is integrating traditional land practices with modern resource USDA Forest Service, Karuk Indigenous Weavers, California Indian management on 2,100 acres of the Plumas National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • A FIS and USSA Homologations Valid 2016-17 (As of March 26 2016)
    USA FIS and USSA Homologations Valid 2016-17 (as of March 26 2016) State Place / Venue / Ski Area Trail / Slope Name Number Event Vertical ENL/Registered Year End Validty Status STATUS: OK - homologation continues valid for 2016-17 season; SEE ALSO - Report on WORK IN PROCESS as of March 26 2016 AK Alyeska Resort Alyeska GS 9605/09/10 GS 448 2010 Nov 2020 OK AK Alyeska Resort Gail's Gully 11652/02/15 GS 341 2015 Nov 2025 OK AK Alyeska Resort Gail's Gully 11652/02/15 SL 183 2015 Nov 2025 OK AK Alyeska Resort Glacier Bowl 11841/11/15 DH 751 2015 Nov 2020 OK AK Alyeska Resort Glacier Bowl 11842/11/15 SG 468 2015 Nov 2020 OK AK Alyeska Resort Racing Trail 9602/09/10 SL 211 2010 Nov 2020 OK AK Alyeska Resort South Edge-Mambo 11840/11/15 SL 190 2015 Nov 2025 OK AK Alyeska Resort Tanaka Hill 9601/09/10 SL 158 2010 Nov 2020 OK AK Alyeska Resort Upper Mountain GS 9600/09/10 GS 440 2010 Nov 2020 OK AK Eaglecrest Ski Area Hilary's GS U706/12/10 GS 252 2010 Nov 2020 OK AK Eaglecrest Ski Area Hilary's SL U707/12/10 SL 138 2010 Nov 2020 OK AK Hilltop Ptarmigan/Ram's Head U1081/12/15 GS 91 REGISTERED 2015 Nov 2025 OK AK Hilltop Ptarmigan/Ram's Head U1082/12/15 SL 91 REGISTERED 2015 Nov 2025 OK AZ Arizona Snow Bowl Lower Ridge/Phoenix/Agassiz 11957/01/16 GS 200 ENL 2016 Nov 2026 OK AZ Arizona Snow Bowl Phoenix/Agassiz 11958/01/16 SL 140 2016 Nov 2026 OK CA Alpine Meadows Boomerang 11782/10/15 GS 279 2015 Nov 2025 OK CA Alpine Meadows Boomerang 11783/10/15 SL 200 2015 Nov 2025 OK CA Alpine Meadows Kangaroo U815/11/11 GS 115 REGISTERED 2011 Nov 2021 OK
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinated Transportation Plan for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities I Table of Contents June 2020
    Table of Contents June 2020 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................... 1-1 Development of the CTP .......................................................................................................... 1-3 Principles of the CTP ................................................................................................................ 1-5 Overview of relevant grant programs ..................................................................................... 1-7 TriMet Role as the Special Transportation Fund Agency ........................................................ 1-8 Other State Funding ................................................................................................................. 1-9 Coordination with Metro and Joint Policy Advisory Committee (JPACT) .............................. 1-11 2. Existing Transportation Services ...................................................................... 2-1 Regional Transit Service Providers .......................................................................................... 2-6 Community-Based Transit Providers ..................................................................................... 2-18 Statewide Transit Providers ................................................................................................... 2-26 3. Service Guidelines ........................................................................................... 3-1 History .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinated Plan, As Follows
    COORDINATED TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR SENIORS AND PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES Prepared for: TriMet Prepared by: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. MAY 27, 2016 Introduction January 21, 2019 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................... 1-1 Development of the CTP .................................................................................. 1-2 Principles of the CTP ........................................................................................ 1-5 2. Existing Transportation Services ...................................................................... 2-1 Regional Transit Service Providers ................................................................... 2-5 Community-Based Transit Providers .............................................................. 2-21 Statewide Transit Providers ........................................................................... 2-32 3. Service Guidelines ........................................................................................... 3-1 History ............................................................................................................. 3-1 Service Guidelines ............................................................................................ 3-2 Capacity Guidelines .......................................................................................... 3-7 Performance Measures and Reporting .......................................................... 3-11 4. Needs Assessment
    [Show full text]
  • Government Camp Summit Rest Area Redevelopment Assessment Report Oregon Solutions | January 2021
    Government Camp Summit Rest Area Redevelopment Assessment Report Oregon Solutions | January 2021 Oregon Solutions | January 25, 2021 1 Acknowledgements Oregon Solutions greatly appreciates all those who generously gave their time to inform this assessment and report. Authors Karmen Fore, Director, Oregon Solutions Doug Decker, consultant to Oregon Solutions Contact Oregon Solutions National Policy Consensus Center Hatfield School of Government Portland State University Urban Center, Room 720 506 SW Mill Street Portland, OR 97207-0751 (503) 725-9077, [email protected] www.orsolutions.org Editing and layout: Cat McGinnis, National Policy Consensus Center Cover photo: Mount Hood, Oregon, IStock Oregon Solutions | January 25, 2021 2 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................ 4 2. METHODS ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 3. OVERVIEW .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 4. ASSESSMENT FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................ 6 4.1. High level of alignment and interest ................................................................................................ 6 4.2. Project lead
    [Show full text]