DOCSLIB.ORG

Effect of Patch Size on Species Richness and Distribution of Sub-Alpine Saxicolous Lichens

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Effect of Patch Size on Species Richness and Distribution of Sub-Alpine Saxicolous Lichens Effect of patch size on species richness and distribution of sub-alpine saxicolous lichens Abraham Adida1, Melody Griffith2, Margot Kirby3, and Amanda Lin3 1University of California, Santa Cruz; 2University of California, Davis; 3University of California, Los Angeles ABSTRACT Understanding how communities respond to environmental pressures is important for conservation planning and management. In this observational study, we examined the SLOSS debate and the ecological concept of nestedness in respect to how saxicolous lichen communities in sub-alpine habitats are structured. We analyzed the effects of patch size on the species richness and distribution of saxicolous lichen. We surveyed 242 granitic rocks in the White Mountains, California, and collected data on the different taxa found. Our results showed that there was greater species richness per m2 on small rocks, supporting the “Several Small” side of the SLOSS debate. Additionally, we found that there was a high degree of nestedness in our study system. Saxicolous lichen provide a manageable scale to test community-level ecological concepts and allow us to better define the boundaries of their applications. Keywords: saxicolous lichen, community ecology, SLOSS, nestedness, sub-alpine INTRODUCTION addresses species richness within a confined habitat, but overlooks species composition Investigation into how ecological concepts and distribution across habitats, and is can be used to determine community therefore often supplemented with the responses to environmental pressures may ecological concept of nestedness. help inform conservation planning and Nestedness is a measure of structure in the management of biotic assemblages (Will- distribution of species across habitats. wolf et al. 2006).⁠ Application of these models Systems with high nestedness would can vary among taxa and defining their demonstrate that species-poor habitats boundaries can increase confidence in their contain a subset of the taxa in species-rich use. The Single Large or Several Small habitats (Patterson and D. 1987).⁠ In practice, (SLOSS) debate was first derived from the this often results in rare species being Island Biogeography Theory in 1976, and is confined to species-rich sites, and species used in conservation planning to determine found in species-poor sites being common in if several small habitats or fewer large every habitat. Generally, systems that are habitats are best for conserving biodiversity strongly nested have more species on fewer (Simberloff and Abele 1976).⁠ SLOSS large sites than on several smaller sites of CEC Research | https://doi.org/10.21973/N3QH34 Summer 2021 Vol. 5, Issue 5 1/7 the same area (Wright and Reeves 1992).⁠ radiation, and frequent disturbances (Heber However, natural systems are rarely et al. 2000, Leavitt et al. 2021).⁠ Lichens living perfectly nested (Berglund and Jonsson in such environments are often tolerant to 2003).⁠⁠⁠ A review examining nestedness on these stressors, and although they are slow archipelagoes found that although 89% growing, they have adaptations that allow demonstrated a high degree of nestedness, them to recover photosynthetic capabilities zero exhibited perfect nestedness (Boecklen after desiccation and grow quickly following 1997).⁠ This was explained by variation in life snow melt (Anstett and Coiner 2010).⁠ history of organisms, including colonization, Saxicolous lichens, which grow on rocks, extinction rates, and behavioral plasticity in experience abiotic habitat stability as their response to environmental shifts. Sessile substrates are relatively unchanging organisms have relatively consistent compared to biotic substrates. Developing habitats, due to slow migration rates, that an understanding of how lichens may offer a simplified model to study these respond to variation in habitat patch size and ecological concepts. relative species richness could help predict Lichens are complex composite organisms how alpine lichens may respond to large- that blur the boundary between the scale habitat disturbances, such as habitat archaea, plantae, and fungi kingdoms (Nash fragmentation and reduction of III 2008). Touted in textbooks as a classic precipitation due to anthropogenic climate example of symbiosis, these organisms change (Rodriguez et al. 2017).⁠⁠ consist of a mycobiont (the fungal Previous research examining the SLOSS contributor) and a photobiont, which can be debate has found that larger, continuous composed of one or multiple cyanobacteria habitats are better for habitat conservation or algae (Nash III 2008).⁠⁠ Their contribution to of predators (Soulé and Simberloff 1986),⁠ biological weathering, soil production, and whereas in marine environments, several development of living soil crusts makes them small habitats of seagrass beds were important players in ecological resource observed to increase species richness for fish cycling (Will-wolf et al. 2006).⁠⁠ In addition, and macro invertebrates (McNeill and their sensitivity to air quality have made Fairweather 1993).⁠ However, the SLOSS them useful as bioindicators for pollution debate and nestedness theory has proven (Conti and Cecchetti 2001).⁠ Their persistence more nuanced regarding sessile species. One in harsh habitats has contributed to their study focused on epixylic lichen, or those expansive colonization, with lichens making living on the surfaces of wood, found no up approximately 8% of the Earth’s surface relationship between the number of species (Ahmadjian 1995).⁠ and the tree size (Schei et al. 2013).⁠ This Lichens occupy a wide range of habitats debate merits the exploration of how globally, from the tropics to the arctic saxicolous sub-alpine lichens may respond to (Determeyer-Wiedmann et al. 2019).⁠ Lichen varying habitat patch size in order to living in sub-alpine habitats are exposed to a determine which model is best applied to number of harsh environmental conditions, these unique organisms. such as low water availability, high UV CEC Research | https://doi.org/10.21973/N3QH34 Summer 2021 Vol. 5, Issue 5 2/7 In this study, we examined how patch size 2.2 Observational Survey contributes to saxicolous lichen species richness and distribution. We hypothesized We surveyed lichen species on 242 rocks that lichen richness per unit area would not and boulders to discover potential patterns be determined by habitat size, due to their in their distributions. Individual boulders sessile nature and previous research on were haphazardly chosen within a 150 m by epixylic lichen that found no relationship 150 m area to standardize locational effects. (Schei et al. 2013).⁠⁠ However, we predicted An effort was made to exhaustively survey we would see ecological nestedness because the rocks in the study area. Boulders with a although there is often a relationship calculated surface area below .025 m or between habitat area and species richness, above 50 meters squared were omitted from nestedness does not evaluate richness with our study for practical reasons. To calculate respect to area (Cook 2008).⁠ surface area, we treated each boulder as a rectangular prism. The height, width, and METHODS lengths of each boulder was calculated by measuring the most extreme point of each 2.1 Site Selection axis with transect tape. The bottom surface of the rectangular prism buried in the We conducted our study at the University ground was omitted from the calculated of California Natural Reserve System’s White surface area to make our measurement of Mountain Research Center at the Sage Hen surface area more representative of Flats (37°29'42"N, 118°10'06"W) on August substrates suitable for lichen colonization. 4-6, 2021. The clearing, located between Each boulder was measured for species Blanco and Campito Mountains, sits at a richness by counting and recording the relatively level 3200 meters of elevation. number of different species of lichens. We Temperature data collected at the nearby identified lichen morphologically to the Cooked Creek Station measure an average nearest taxonomic certainty, noting species temperature of 13.5°C, an average humidity and/or genus when positive species of 39%, and negligible amount of identification was not possible without the precipitation during the early-August use of chemistry. timeframe of our study. Rock type in the area is primarily granitic, with dolomite, 2.3 Statistical Analysis sandstone, and quartzite rocks being common fixtures of the terrain (Mooney et We used JMP version 16.0.0 to perform all al. 1962).⁠ We chose to sample only granitic statistical analyses. We used logistic rocks, as they uniquely harbor a high regressions to evaluate the effect of rock diversity of lichen types, including crustose, surface area on three factors: the total 2 umbilicate, fruticose and foliose lichen number of lichen species per m , the total (Wolseley et al. 2006).⁠ number of lichen species per rock, and the presence of each lichen species. Additionally, we used the NeD online software to test the nestedness of the lichen CEC Research | https://doi.org/10.21973/N3QH34 Summer 2021 Vol. 5, Issue 5 3/7 community with the NODF (nestedness based on overlap and decreasing fill) metric (Strona et al. 2014).⁠ RESULTS We identified seventeen taxa of lichen. Seven lichen taxa were identified to genus- level, and ten were identified to species- level. Thirteen were crustose, three were foliose, and one was fruticose. As rock Figure 2. Effect of rock surface area on the number surface area increased, there was an of lichen taxa per meter squared.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lichens and Associated Fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska
    The Lichenologist (2020), 52,61–181 doi:10.1017/S0024282920000079 Standard Paper Lichens and associated fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska Toby Spribille1,2,3 , Alan M. Fryday4 , Sergio Pérez-Ortega5 , Måns Svensson6, Tor Tønsberg7, Stefan Ekman6 , Håkon Holien8,9, Philipp Resl10 , Kevin Schneider11, Edith Stabentheiner2, Holger Thüs12,13 , Jan Vondrák14,15 and Lewis Sharman16 1Department of Biological Sciences, CW405, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R3, Canada; 2Department of Plant Sciences, Institute of Biology, University of Graz, NAWI Graz, Holteigasse 6, 8010 Graz, Austria; 3Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA; 4Herbarium, Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA; 5Real Jardín Botánico (CSIC), Departamento de Micología, Calle Claudio Moyano 1, E-28014 Madrid, Spain; 6Museum of Evolution, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 16, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden; 7Department of Natural History, University Museum of Bergen Allégt. 41, P.O. Box 7800, N-5020 Bergen, Norway; 8Faculty of Bioscience and Aquaculture, Nord University, Box 2501, NO-7729 Steinkjer, Norway; 9NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway; 10Faculty of Biology, Department I, Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany; 11Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK; 12Botany Department, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany; 13Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK; 14Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic; 15Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic and 16Glacier Bay National Park & Preserve, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Equilibrium Theory of Island Biogeography: a Review
    Equilibrium Theory of Island Biogeography: A Review Angela D. Yu Simon A. Lei Abstract—The topography, climatic pattern, location, and origin of relationship, dispersal mechanisms and their response to islands generate unique patterns of species distribution. The equi- isolation, and species turnover. Additionally, conservation librium theory of island biogeography creates a general framework of oceanic and continental (habitat) islands is examined in in which the study of taxon distribution and broad island trends relation to minimum viable populations and areas, may be conducted. Critical components of the equilibrium theory metapopulation dynamics, and continental reserve design. include the species-area relationship, island-mainland relation- Finally, adverse anthropogenic impacts on island ecosys- ship, dispersal mechanisms, and species turnover. Because of the tems are investigated, including overexploitation of re- theoretical similarities between islands and fragmented mainland sources, habitat destruction, and introduction of exotic spe- landscapes, reserve conservation efforts have attempted to apply cies and diseases (biological invasions). Throughout this the theory of island biogeography to improve continental reserve article, theories of many researchers are re-introduced and designs, and to provide insight into metapopulation dynamics and utilized in an analytical manner. The objective of this article the SLOSS debate. However, due to extensive negative anthropo- is to review previously published data, and to reveal if any genic activities, overexploitation of resources, habitat destruction, classical and emergent theories may be brought into the as well as introduction of exotic species and associated foreign study of island biogeography and its relevance to mainland diseases (biological invasions), island conservation has recently ecosystem patterns. become a pressing issue itself.
    [Show full text]
  • A Perspective on the Geodynamics And
    Title: Oceanic archipelagos: a perspective on the geodynamics and biogeography of the World’s smallest biotic provinces Journal Issue: Frontiers of Biogeography, 8(2) Author: Triantis, Kostas, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Whittaker, Robert J. Fernández-Palacios, José María Geist, Dennis J. Publication Date: 2016 Permalink: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/744009b2 Acknowledgements: D.J. Geist acknowledges the support of NSF (EAR-1145271). We thank the editors, Luis Valente and an anonymous referee for constructive comments on the manuscript. Author Bio: Assistant Professor Keywords: Diversity, island biogeography, hotspot, mantle, macroecology, macroevolution, meta- archipelagos, subsidence, island evolution, volcanic islands Local Identifier: fb_29605 Abstract: Since the contributions of Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace, oceanic archipelagos have played a central role in the development of biogeography. However, despite the critical influence of oceanic islands on ecological and evolutionary theory, our focus has remained limited to either the island-level of specific archipelagos or single archipelagos. Recently, it was proposed that oceanic archipelagos qualify as biotic provinces, with diversity primarily reflecting a balance between speciation and extinction, with colonization having a minor role. Here we focus on major attributes of the archipelagic geological dynamics that can affect diversity at both the island and the archipelagic level. We also re-affirm that oceanic archipelagos are appropriate spatiotemporal
    [Show full text]
  • Protected Areas and Biodiversity Conservation I: Reserve Planning and Design
    Network of Conservation Educators & Practitioners Protected Areas and Biodiversity Conservation I: Reserve Planning and Design Author(s): Eugenia Naro-Maciel, Eleanor J. Stering, and Madhu Rao Source: Lessons in Conservation, Vol. 2, pp. 19-49 Published by: Network of Conservation Educators and Practitioners, Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, American Museum of Natural History Stable URL: ncep.amnh.org/linc/ This article is featured in Lessons in Conservation, the official journal of the Network of Conservation Educators and Practitioners (NCEP). NCEP is a collaborative project of the American Museum of Natural History’s Center for Biodiversity and Conservation (CBC) and a number of institutions and individuals around the world. Lessons in Conservation is designed to introduce NCEP teaching and learning resources (or “modules”) to a broad audience. NCEP modules are designed for undergraduate and professional level education. These modules—and many more on a variety of conservation topics—are available for free download at our website, ncep.amnh.org. To learn more about NCEP, visit our website: ncep.amnh.org. All reproduction or distribution must provide full citation of the original work and provide a copyright notice as follows: “Copyright 2008, by the authors of the material and the Center for Biodiversity and Conservation of the American Museum of Natural History. All rights reserved.” Illustrations obtained from the American Museum of Natural History’s library: images.library.amnh.org/digital/ SYNTHESIS 19 Protected Areas and Biodiversity Conservation I: Reserve Planning and Design Eugenia Naro-Maciel,* Eleanor J. Stering, † and Madhu Rao ‡ * The American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, U.S.A., email [email protected] † The American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, U.S.A., email [email protected] ‡ Wildlife Conservation Society, New York, NY, U.S.A., email [email protected] Source: K.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Design
    Schueller NRE 509 What allowed your metapopulation to persist (not crash) even when populations Schueller NRE 509 Lecture 19: went extinct? Landscape Ecology Applied – High enough: _____________ 1. Fragmentation 2. The Design of Reserves and Not too high:______________ Landscapes Landscape Ecology APPLIED: Causes of fragmentation? 1. Fragmentation a. What is it/what does it look like? •Natural b. What causes it? - fires, floods, succession c. What are the consequences? •Anthropogenic - Previously continuous NOTICE Variation in patch & habitat is fragmented matrix type, and: into patches within a • Area matrix • Shape • Arrangement (connectivity) The world’s ongoing fragmentation experiments Haddad et al. 2015. Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Causes of fragmentation? Earth’s ecosystems. Sci Adv. 1:e1500052 •Natural - fires, floods, succession,… •Anthropogenic - agriculture, logging, development, oil & gas extraction, mining,… - fences, roads, powerlines, dams, … What are the consequences? 1 Schueller NRE 509 • Largest and longest-running experiment to General findings: Ecological study fragmentation in tropical forests • Increased mortality of mechanisms? • Manaus, Brazil tree species • Started in 1979 • Loss of frugivorous Use your smarts to birds in small fragments • By logging, set up a series of forest patches, • Loss of large predators come up with specific ranging in size from 1 to 100 ha in small fragments hypotheses •Increase in generalist http://pdbff.inpa.gov.br/iarea.html species What are the implications of fragmentation? 1. AREA effects (fragment size) How large is enough? What does it depend on? Species-area For example, - Trophic level relationship • Butterflies that move less - Dispersion of Competition = than128 m in their lifetime resources in smaller populations the habitat = increased chance • Mice with home ranges of of extinction about half a hectare.
    [Show full text]
  • How Does Habitat Fragmentation Affect Biodiversity? a Controversial Question at the Coreof Conservation Biology
    Biological Conservation xxx (xxxx) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Editorial How does habitat fragmentation affect biodiversity? A controversial question at the coreof conservation biology Does habitat fragmentation harm biodiversity? For many years, production based in part on concerns about the negative effects of most conservation biologists would say “yes.” It seems intuitive that fragmentation (OMNR, 2002; Fahrig, 2017). fragmentation divides habitats into smaller patches, which support Fahrig (2017) recently argued that the evidence base for these be- fewer species (Haddad et al., 2015). Edge effects further erode the liefs, recommendations, and actions is not as strong as many think, ability of small patches to support some species. This reasoning has largely due to the confounding effects of scale, habitat amount, and been invoked, for example, when interpreting the results of iconic fragmentation. In a separate essay, Fahrig (2018) described the history conservation experiments and studies, such as the large forest frag- of research that led to the current understanding (or misunderstanding) ments experiment in the Brazilian Amazon (Laurance et al., 2011), and regarding the effects of fragmentation on biodiversity. Processes that has been supported by meta-analyses of the findings of fragmentation occur at local patch scales—the scale of the vast majority of fragmen- experiments (Haddad et al., 2015). The negative effects of fragmenta- tation studies—may not be the dominant processes that affect biodi- tion are taught to students in introductory biology, ecology, and con- versity at larger landscape scales. Moreover, in practice, landscapes servation courses and featured in textbooks.
    [Show full text]
  • Shafer * Natural Resources, Stewardship and Science, National Park Service 1849 C St
    Biological Conservation 100 (2001) 215±227 www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Inter-reserve distance Craig L. Shafer * Natural Resources, Stewardship and Science, National Park Service 1849 C St. NW, Washington DC 20240, USA Received 14 March 2000; received in revised form 20 November 2000; accepted 21 December 2000 Abstract Since the mid-1970s, reserve planners have been advised to locate reserves in close proximity to facilitate biotic migration. The alternative, putting great distance between reserves as a safeguard against catastrophe or long-standing chronic degradation forces, has received little discussion. The demise of a population can be caused by both natural and anthropogenic agents and the latter, including poaching and global warming, could be the bigger threat. Reserves sharing biotic components, whether close together or far apart, have advantages as well as costs. We need to consider whether the result of adopting the proximate reserve design guideline to preserve maximum species number will contribute to the potential extinction or extirpation of some rare ¯agship spe- cies? Should such extinctions occur, will society be understanding of science-based advise? Current conservation dogma that claims reserves should be located in close proximity demands more scrutiny because that choice may be tested this century. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. Keywords: Catastrophe; Reserve; Design; Planning; Management 1. Introduction sur®cial phenomena (e.g. earthquakes, meteor strikes). In addition, scientists usually assume that such geologi- Simberlo (1998) asked how the adoption of goals cal events are infrequent in historical time (Raup, 1984). like ``biological diversity management'' supersedes When scientists use the term catastrophe for biological management of their component species? The intent of impacts, which may have natural or anthropogenic the earliest reserve design guidelines (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • For Peer Review 19 15 4Department of Biology, University of Missouri at St
    Global Ecology and Biogeography New Directions in Isla nd Biogeography Journal: Global Ecology and Biogeography ManuscriptFor ID GEB-2016-0004.R1 Peer Review Manuscript Type: Research Reviews Date Submitted by the Author: n/a Complete List of Authors: Santos, Ana; Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), Department of Biogeography & Global Change; Universidade dos Açores , Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c)/Azorean Biodiversity Group Field, Richard; University of Nottingham, School of Geography; Ricklefs, Robert; University of Missouri-St,. Louis, Biology Climatic niche, evolutionary processes, General Dynamic Model, Invasive species, marine environments, Natural laboratories, Species-area Keywords: relationship, species interactions, Equilibrium Theory of Island Biogeography, Community Assembly Page 9 of 61 Global Ecology and Biogeography 1 2 3 1 Manuscript type: Research Review 4 2 5 3 New Directions in Island Biogeography 6 4 7 1,2, 3 4 8 5 Ana M. C. Santos *, Richard Field & Robert E. Ricklefs 9 6 10 7 1 Department of Biogeography & Global Change, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales 11 8 (CSIC), C/ José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain. Email: 12 9 [email protected] 13 2 14 10 Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c)/Azorean Biodiversity 15 11 Group and Universidade dos Açores – Departamento de Ciências Agrárias, 9700-042 Angra 16 12 do Heroísmo, Açores, Portugal 17 13 3School of Geography, University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. Email: 18 14 [email protected] Peer Review 19 15 4Department of Biology, University of Missouri at St. Louis, One University Boulevard, St. 20 21 16 Louis, MO 63121 USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Theory and Design of Nature Reserves Kent E
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn EEB Articles Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology 2012 Theory and design of nature reserves Kent E. Holsinger University of Connecticut - Storrs, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/eeb_articles Part of the Other Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Population Biology Commons Recommended Citation Holsinger, Kent E., "Theory and design of nature reserves" (2012). EEB Articles. 41. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/eeb_articles/41 Theory and Design of Nature Reserves Managing landscapes In a 2008 review, David Lindenmayer and a long list of distinguished conservation biologists review two decades of research on landscape management [5]. They identify a set of 13 factors that anyone managing a landscape for conservation should consider, and they group those factors under four boad themes: setting goals, spatial issues, temporal issues, and management approaches. • Setting goals { Develop long-term shared visions and quantifiable objectives. • Spatial issues { Manage the entire mosaic, not just the pieces. { Consider both the amount and configuration of habitat and particular land cover types. { Identify disproportionately important species, processes, and landscape elements. { Integrate aquatic and terrestrial environments. { Use a landscape classification and conceptual models appropriate to objectives. • Temporal issues { Maintain the capability of landscapes to recover from disturbances. { Manage for change. { Time lags
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Wild Animal Welfare
    Potential effects of habitat fragmentation on wild animal welfare Matthew Allcock1,3 and Luke Hecht2,3,* 1 School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sheffield, Hounsfield Road, Sheffield S3 7RH, UK 2 Department of Biosciences, Durham University, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK 3 Animal Ethics, 4200 Park Blvd. #129, Oakland, CA 94602, USA *to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected] 1. Introduction The habitats of wild animals change in significant ways, attributable to both anthropogenic and naturogenic causes. Habitat changes affect the welfare of inhabiting populations directly, such as by decreasing the available food, and indirectly, such as by adjusting the evolutionary fitness of behavioral and physical traits that affect the welfare of the animals who express them. While by no means simple, estimating the direct welfare effects of habitat changes, which often occur over a short timescale, seems tractable. The same cannot yet be said for the indirect effects, which are dominated by long-term considerations and can be chaotic due to the immense complexity of natural ecosystems. In terms of wild animal welfare, it is plausible that the indirect effects of habitat change dominate the direct effects because they occur over many generations, affecting many more individuals. Accounting for such long-term impacts is a crucial objective and challenge for those who advocate for research and stewardship of wild animal welfare (e.g. Ng, 2016; Beausoleil et al. 2018; Waldhorn, 2019; Capozzelli et al. 2020). Despite the seemingly lower tractability of predicting long-term and indirect effects, we must consider all impacts of actions to improve wild animal welfare.
    [Show full text]
  • The Habitat Amount Hypothesis Lenore Fahrig
    Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2013) 40, 1649–1663 SYNTHESIS Rethinking patch size and isolation effects: the habitat amount hypothesis Lenore Fahrig Geomatics and Landscape Ecology Research ABSTRACT Laboratory (GLEL), Department of Biology, I challenge (1) the assumption that habitat patches are natural units of mea- Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, surement for species richness, and (2) the assumption of distinct effects of hab- Canada itat patch size and isolation on species richness. I propose a simpler view of the relationship between habitat distribution and species richness, the ‘habitat amount hypothesis’, and I suggest ways of testing it. The habitat amount hypothesis posits that, for habitat patches in a matrix of non-habitat, the patch size effect and the patch isolation effect are driven mainly by a single underly- ing process, the sample area effect. The hypothesis predicts that species richness in equal-sized sample sites should increase with the total amount of habitat in the ‘local landscape’ of the sample site, where the local landscape is the area within an appropriate distance of the sample site. It also predicts that species richness in a sample site is independent of the area of the particular patch in which the sample site is located (its ‘local patch’), except insofar as the area of that patch contributes to the amount of habitat in the local landscape of the sample site. The habitat amount hypothesis replaces two predictor variables, patch size and isolation, with a single predictor variable, habitat amount, when species richness is analysed for equal-sized sample sites rather than for unequal-sized habitat patches.
    [Show full text]
  • Lichen Flora of Mt. Tokachi, Hokkaido, Japan
    Bull. Natn. Sci. Mus., Tokyo, Ser. B, 30(3), pp. 89–102, September 22, 2004 Lichen Flora of Mt. Tokachi, Hokkaido, Japan Akira Shimizu1, Masakane Inoue2 and Kwang Hee Moon3 1 Graduate School of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, 060–0810 Japan E-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Natural and Environmental Science, Faculty of Education and Human Studies, Akita University, Akita, 010–8502 Japan E-mail: [email protected] 3 Natural Science Institute, Sook Myung Women’s University, Seoul, Korea E-mail: [email protected] Abstract As members of the lichen flora of Mt. Tokachi, an active volcano in Hokkaido, 159 lichen taxa belonging to 69 genera are recognized. Although most of them are common also in arc- tic-alpine and boreal zones of other areas of Japan, Trapelia involuta is reported for first time for Japan. The flora seems to be composed of lichens belonging to the arctic-alpine, circumboreal, Beringian, eastern Asia - North America disjunctive, pan-temperate, Far-Eastern groups. Key words: lichens, flora, Mt. Tokachi, volcanic environment, Hokkaido. Mt. Tokachi (2077 m; 43°25ЈN, 142°41ЈE) is tween 1040 and 700 m (15 in Fig.1); deciduous an active volcano located in the Daisetsuzan Na- forest dominated by Fraxinus mandshurica var. tional Park, Hokkaido, Japan (Fig. 1). The japonica, Acer sp., Alnus hirsuta, Quercus ground around Mt. Tokachi consists of volcanic crispula var. grosseserrata, Ulmus laciniata etc. ejecta and lava (mainly andesite) which were are developed in the riverside below 700 m (16 in erupted during different periods from the Pleis- Fig.
    [Show full text]