Graphite Oxide, Carbon Nanotubes and Their Composite Effect of Irradiation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Danubia NanoTech, s.r.o. Research in science and technology Properties of Graphite Oxide, Carbon Nanotubes and their Composite Effect of Irradiation Viera Skákalová 2001-2011 2011- ???? Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research University of Vienna Stuttgart Collaboratations Danubia NanoTech, s.r.o. Research in science and technology Sample preparation, characterization: TEM, modelling: Viliam Vretenár Jannik Meyer Martin Hulman Franz Eder Peter Kotrusz Jani Kotakoski Marcel Meško Max Planck Institute, Stuttgart Hungarian Academy of Sciences: Electronic transport: Ion irradiation: Dong Su Lee Zsolt E. Horvath Hye Jin Park Laszlo P. Biro Different modifications of carbon Danubia NanoTech, s.r.o. Research in nanoscience and nanotechnology • Production of Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes • Research on SWNT • Production of Few-Layer Graphene • Research on Graphene Defects in SWNTs Raman specroscopy - inelastic photon scattering G D* RBM Raman Intensity (a.u.) 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Raman shift (cm-1) D-mode of Raman spectra increases with the Dose of Ar+ ions D-mode 632 nm pristine 6 D-mode 632 nm12 4.0x10 ions/cm2 pristine 2 12 5 5.0x10 4.0x1011 ions/cm 2ions/cm2 1.0x1012 ions/cm12 2 4.0x10 ions/cm2 2.0x1012ions/cm2 4 1 3 D 2 IntensityIntensityIntensityIntensity (a.u.) (a.u.) (a.u.) (a.u.) Intensity (a.u.) 0 1 1200 1300 1400 Wavenumber (cm-1) 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Wavenumber (cm-1) SWNT paper irradiated by 23 MeV C4+ ions ions Greater damage at the REAR side 8 Back side Irradiated side 6 o )/I o 4 -I d (I 2 D‐mode 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Dose (1013 ion/cm2) Skakalova, Kaiser, Detlaff, Arstila, Krashenninikov, Keinonen, Roth: Physica Status Solidi B, 245, (2008) 2280‐2283 C4+‐irradiation of SWNT paper: Electrical conductivity C4+-energy = 23 MeV 400 Quasi-1D metal C4+ energy = 23 MeV 0 300 300 T = 300K 1. 1014 ion/cm2 200 200 3 10 100 100 30 Conductivity (S/cm) Conductivity (S/cm) 0 Variable-range hopping 0 102030 0 100 200 300 2 Temperature (K) Dose (ion/cm ) Electrical conductance of Ar+ irradiated thin SWNT networks ions 1.2 + o Ar energy = 30 keV 0.8 G(Dose)/G 0.4 0.0 0510 Dose (1012 ion/cm2) 1/(1d ) T Variable‐Range Hopping: ()T exp 0 0 T Surface penetration by 30 keV Ar+ ions ions Dose effects of 30 keV Ar+ ions + 8 0.2 Ar energy = 30 keV o 6 ]/G o o 0.1 )/I o -I 4 d (I 0.0 D-mode 2 [G(Dose)-G -0.1 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 5 10 15 20 25 12 2 Dose (1012 ion/cm2) Dose (10 ion/cm ) V. Skakalova, A.B. Kaiser, Z. Osvath, G. Vertesy, L.P. Biro, S. Roth, Appl. Phys. A 90, 597–602 (2008) Effect of thermal annealing: Recovering structure of SWNTs Pristine Irradiated Annealed IntensityIntensityIntensity D 1100 1200 1300 1400 Wavenumber (cm-1) Viera Skákalová, Janina Maultzsch, Zoltán Osváth, László P. Biró, and Siegmar Roth, Phys. Stat. Sol. (RRL) 1, No. 4, 138– 140 (2007) Defects in Graphene Hexagonal crystal structure of graphene Two equivalent sub‐lattices A and B TEM study of electron irradiation: 12C vs 13C Direct knock-on damage: Energy = 95 keV, Dose of 1.4 x 109 e/nm2 12C 13C no damage Damage induced by contamination initial after exposure Jannik C. Meyer, et al. , PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTER 108, 196102 (2012) Measured and calculated knock-on displacement cross sections. Monovacancy: dangling bond with a much lower emission threshold. Subsequent sputtering of this atom may double the cross section. The lower boundary of the shaded areas correspond to the calculated cross section. The upper boundary is twice the calculated value (expected for correlated sputtering). Jannik C. Meyer, et al. , PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTER 108, 196102 (2012) Temperature dependences of conductance Ni‐ A few layers catalyst 2 nm Cu-catalyst A monolayers Monocrystal 1 nm Defects formed in presence of ammonia 1 nm 1. pristine CVD‐monolayer 2. N‐doped CVD‐monolayer -5 10 1 10-6 D 2 2D Sheet conductance (S) Sheet conductance (S) 10-7 10 100 Temperature (K) G H. J. Park, V. Skákalová, T. Iwasaki, J. C. Meyer, U. Kaiser and S. Roth, Physica Status Solidi B, 247(2010)2915‐2919 Chemical Oxidation‐Reduction of Graphite Graphite oxide was first prepared by Oxford chemist Benjamin C. Brodie in 1859 Oxidation introduces functional groups: A: Epoxy bridges B: Hydroxyl groups C: Pairwise carboxyl groups Reduction removes functional groups - Restores sp2 orbitals - Leaves many structural defects Microscopic characterization of thermally reduced Graphite Oxide (rGO) SEM of GO flakes (Hummers) STEM of reduced GO Spectroscopic characterization of thermally reduced Graphite Oxide (rGO) Raman spectra GO GO reduced GO reduced GO 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 nm 0.5 0.5 0.5 Intensity (norm. to G-mode) Intensity (norm. to G-mode) Intensity (norm. to 0.0 0.0 G-mode) Intensity (norm. to 0.0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500500 3000 1000 3500 1500 2000 2500500 3000 1000 3500 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 -1 -1 -1 Wavenumber (cm ) Wavenumber (cm ) Wavenumber (cm ) X‐ray Photo‐electron Spectra Thorough removal of oxide groups Microscopic characterization of thermally reduced Graphite Oxide (rGO) HR TEM: Jannik Meyer, Uni Ulm Electrical conductivity of thermally reduced Graphite Oxide (rGO) In comparison with SWNT and SWNT‐GO composite 200 rGO 180 180 160 140 160 120 100 SWNT Conductivity (S/cm) Conductivity (S/cm) Conductivity (S/cm) 140 SWNT-GO RGOrGO 80 100100 Temperature (K) SWNT‐GO • The electrical conductivity of SWNT‐GO composite higher than that of SWNT • Identical electron transport mechanism (Fluctuation Assisted Tunnelling) in SWNT‐GO composite and SWNT paper • Very high electrical conductivity in rGO film with metallic electron transport Summary SWNT networks: ‐ Ion irradiation damages the structure and lowers electrical conductivity ‐ Thermal annealing removes defects in the SWNT structure Graphene: A structural damage affects severaly electronic transport Graphite oxide: Non conductive and transparent. Electrical and optical properties tunable by reduction of the oxide groups. Reduced graphite oxide: Metallic character of electron transport Composite SWNT‐GO: The same mechanism of electron transport like in SWNT film Composite SWNT‐reduced GO: ??????????????? Under investigation. Aknowledgment The results have been acquired within several years of collaboration between Max Planck Institute in Stuttgart Danubia NanoTech (SME) in Bratislava and University of Vienna Thanks for attention SWNT networks ) 1 S 10 ( Buckypaper 100 10-1 10-2 Net 4 Net 3 -3 Net 2 Sheet Conductance Conductance Sheet 10 Net 1 0 20406080100 Transmittance (%).