The Significance of Monuments

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Significance of Monuments The Significance of Monuments The Neolithic period, when agriculture began and many monuments were constructed, is an era fraught with paradoxes and ambiguities. Students of prehistory have long found the highly theoretical interpretations of the period perplexing and contradictory. Starting in the Mesolithic and carrying his analysis through to the Late Bronze Age, Richard Bradley sheds light on this complex period and the changing consciousness of the people who lived at the time. The book studies the importance of monuments, tracing their history for nearly three millennia from their first creation over six thousand years ago. Part I discusses how monuments developed and their role in forming a new sense of time and space among the inhabitants of prehistoric Europe. Such features of the landscape as mounds and enclosures are also examined in detail. Through a series of case studies, Part II considers how monuments were modified and reinterpreted to suit the changing needs of society. The Significance of Monuments is an indispensable text for all students of European prehistory. It is also an enlightening read for professional archaeologists and all those interested in this fascinating period. Richard Bradley is Professor of Archaeology at Reading University. Current interests include landscape archaeology and rock art. Recent books include Altering the Earth and Rock Art and the Prehistory of Atlantic Europe. The Significance of Monuments On the shaping of human experience in Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe Richard Bradley London and New York First published 1998 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2001. First published in paperback in 1998 © 1998 Richard Bradley All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication Data Bradley, Richard The significance of monuments : on the shaping of human experience in Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe / Richard Bradley. Includes bibliographical references and index 1. Neolithic period—Europe. 2. Bronze age—Europe. 3. Megalithic monuments—Europe. 4. Architecture, Prehistoric—Europe. 5. Europe—Antiquities. I. Title. GN776.2.A1B73 1998 936—dc21 97–27536 ISBN 0-415-15203-8 (hbk) ISBN 0-415-15204-6 (pbk) ISBN 0-203-02471-0 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-203-07324-X (Glassbook Format) The cover illustration is taken from a one-person touring exhibition called ‘Petrified Garden’ organized by An Lanntair Gallery, Stornoway, Scotland. The picture is a photo-montage made by photographing sections of a stone circle and the horizon from a height of 6.5 metres, with the camera on a pole. Using a flash at night mimics what the stone circle might look like with a central fire, which was one of the curious features of these Aberdeenshire stone circles. Stone circles in the British Isles show enough of a theme and variation in their design to suggest that if we knew the missing elements in each case then the variety of monument types would reduce to a smaller group of pictures on the ground. Just one of many possibilities is that these circles are an expression of the way Neolithic peoples related to their surrounding landscape. The following text accompanied the exhibition and is my response to a way of seeing unrestrained by the painter’s rules of perspective, or the frame of the photograph or television. In a single photograph, the horizon is a line from one side of the frame to the other. Do we really see our surroundings in this way? No, because we look around, we don’t look at. In this way the horizon is a circle, and we are always at the centre of the circle. Even though we define a circle visually wherever we stand, we need not be conscious of ourselves doing the looking, so we define a circle with a hole in the middle. That is the human condition. As we look we also unconsciously magnify the horizon. With the discovery of perspective, a painter could convey distance by making objects on the horizon appear very small. But we see the horizon as bigger than that. A photograph never does justice to the ‘grand view’ to which we aspire because the hills in the distance are smaller than we remembered. The human mind is easily capable of imagining its surroundings from a vantage point above eye-level. Reality in this sense is more map-like. It makes more sense to imagine things from above because the brain needs less memory to make one useful picture – like a template – from which to infer necessary information as we move about. It may be the case that our perception and our cosmology are intimately bound together, and that discovering the meaning of lost cultures will require the simple question to be answered: How did they look at their surroundings? Mark Johnston 1997 For Colin Richards Contents List of figures ix Preface xi PART I From the house of the dead I 1 Structures of sand: settlements, monuments and the nature of the Neolithic 3 2 Thinking the Neolithic: the Mesolithic world view and its transformation 20 3 The death of the house: the origins of long mounds and Neolithic enclosures 36 4 Another time: architecture, ancestry and the development of chambered tombs 51 5 Small worlds: causewayed enclosures and their transformations 68 PART II Describing a circle 83 6 The persistence of memory: ritual, time and the history of ceremonial monuments 85 7 The public interest: ritual and ceremonial, from passage graves to henges 101 viii Contents 8 Theatre in the round: henge monuments, stone circles and their integration with the landscape 116 9 Closed circles: the changing character of monuments, from enclosures to cemeteries 132 10 An agricultural revolution: the domestication of ritual life during later prehistory 147 References 165 Index 177 Figures Figure 1 The Neolithic ‘longhouses’ at Barkaer, Jutland 6 Figure 2 The local setting of Barkaer 7 Figure 3 The internal structure of one of the monuments at Barkaer 8 Figure 4 The agricultural frontier in north and north-west Europe 12 Figure 5 The regions considered in Part I 15 Figure 6 Sites and regions considered in Part II 16 Figure 7 Mesolithic and Neolithic burials at Dragsholm, Zealand 23 Figure 8 Mesolithic burials with deposits of antler 26 Figure 9 Mesolithic burials at Vlasac, Serbia 29 Figure 10 Cist burial at Téviec, Brittany 30 Figure 11 Symbolic structures at Lepenski Vir 33 Figure 12 The distribution of longhouses, long mounds and megalithic tombs 38 Figure 13 The plan of a longhouse at Olszanica, Poland, compared with that of Kilham long barrow, England 39 Figure 14 The changing locations of the longhouses at Langweiler site 9, western Germany 45 Figure 15 The layout of the longhouses at Brzesc Kujavski, compared with that of the long barrows at Sarnowo, Poland 47 Figure 16 Alternative groundplans of Severn Cotswold tombs 55 Figure 17 Plan of Tumulus-St-Michel, Carnac, Brittany 56 Figure 18 The excavated sequence at Le Petit Mont, Arzon, Brittany 57 Figure 19 Alternative groundplans for megalithic tombs 60 Figure 20 The changing relationship between tomb plans and human remains 62 Figure 21 The sequence at the megalithic tomb of Lønt, Jutland 65 Figure 22 Plan of the causewayed enclosure at the Beusterburg, western Germany 70 Figure 23 Plan of the enclosed settlement at Darion, Belgium 75 Figure 24 Plan of the causewayed enclosure at Les Réaudins, northern France 77 Figure 25 Plans of the enclosures at Flagstones and Briar Hill 79 x List of figures Figure 26 The relationship between causewayed enclosures and the wider landscape 81 Figure 27 Stonehenge as a causewayed enclosure 93 Figure 28 The timber phase at Stonehenge 94 Figure 29 The developed stone structure at Stonehenge 96 Figure 30 The final structural phase at Stonehenge 98 Figure 31 The relationship between Stonehenge and barrow cemeteries in the surrounding landscape 100 Figure 32 Outline plan of the passage grave and timber circle at Newgrange 103 Figure 33 Circular imagery in the Boyne valley 105 Figure 34 Outline plan of the cemetery at Knowth 108 Figure 35 Structural features outside the passage grave at Newgrange 111 Figure 36 Stone circles and other features enclosing passage graves 112 Figure 37 Plan of the Stones of Stenness 117 Figure 38 Regions of Britain dominated by henges or stone circles 119 Figure 39 The local setting of the Orkney henges 123 Figure 40 The relationship between henges, stone circles and the surrounding landscape 25 Figure 41 Skyline barrows viewed from the monument at Stonehenge 130 Figure 42 The typology of ‘variant circles’ 134 Figure 43 The excavated sequence at Temple Wood stone circle 135 Figure 44 Stone circles with associated cairns in the Peak District and Cumbria 140 Figure 45 The excavated sequence at Cairnpapple Hill 141 Figure 46 The excavated sequence at Balbirnie 144 Figure 47 Early Bronze Age ceramics as ‘house urns’ illustrated by the evidence from the Down Farm pond barrow 151 Figure 48 The plan of a round house at South Lodge Camp compared with that of a nearby barrow 152 Figure 49 The plan of a round barrow on Itford Hill compared with that of a nearby house 153 Figure 50 The organisation of deposits in selected cemeteries and settlements in Sussex 154 Figure 51 The relationship between the Middle Bronze Age cemetery and settlement at Down Farm 156 Figure 52 The structural organisation of selected cemeteries and domestic sites in Cranborne Chase 157 Preface It is curious how one project can overflow into another.
Recommended publications
  • The University of Bradford Institutional Repository
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Bradford Scholars The University of Bradford Institutional Repository http://bradscholars.brad.ac.uk This work is made available online in accordance with publisher policies. Please refer to the repository record for this item and our Policy Document available from the repository home page for further information. To see the final version of this work please visit the publisher’s website. Where available access to the published online version may require a subscription. Author(s): Gibson, Alex M. Title: An Introduction to the Study of Henges: Time for a Change? Publication year: 2012 Book title: Enclosing the Neolithic : Recent studies in Britain and Ireland. Report No: BAR International Series 2440. Publisher: Archaeopress. Link to publisher’s site: http://www.archaeopress.com/archaeopressshop/public/defaultAll.asp?QuickSear ch=2440 Citation: Gibson, A. (2012). An Introduction to the Study of Henges: Time for a Change? In: Gibson, A. (ed.). Enclosing the Neolithic: Recent studies in Britain and Europe. Oxford: Archaeopress. BAR International Series 2440, pp. 1-20. Copyright statement: © Archaeopress and the individual authors 2012. An Introduction to the Study of Henges: Time for a Change? Alex Gibson Abstract This paper summarises 80 years of ‘henge’ studies. It considers the range of monuments originally considered henges and how more diverse sites became added to the original list. It examines the diversity of monuments considered to be henges, their origins, their associated monument types and their dates. Since the introduction of the term, archaeologists have often been uncomfortable with it.
    [Show full text]
  • ROCK ART BIBLIOGRAPHY (Current at July 2008) This Detailed Listing Contains Over a Thousand Publications on Rock Art
    ROCK ART BIBLIOGRAPHY (current at July 2008) This detailed listing contains over a thousand publications on rock art. It relates primarily to rock art in the counties of Durham and Northumberland but also includes many publications on rock art in other parts of Britain and Ireland, as well as on the recording, management, and conservation of carved panels, plus a number of theoretical studies. The bibliography was compiled by Northumberland and Durham Rock Art Pilot Project volunteer, Keith Elliott, with additional contributions from Kate Sharpe and Aron Mazel. Abramson, P. 1996 ‘Excavations along the Caythorpe Gas Pipeline, North Humberside’. Yorkshire Archaeological Journal 68, 1-88 Abramson, P. 2002 'A re-examination of a Viking Age burial at Beacon Hill, Aspatria'. Transactions of the Cumberland and Westmorland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society 100: 79-88. Adams, M. & P. Carne, 1997 ‘The Ingram and Upper Breamish Valley Landscape Project: interim report 1997’. Archaeological Reports of the Universities of Durham and Newcastle upon Tyne 21, 33- 36 Ainsworth, S. & Barnatt, J., 1998, ‘A scarp-enclosure at Gardom’s Edge, Baslow, Derbyshire’. Derbyshire Archaeological Journal 118, 5-23 Aird, R. A., 1911 ‘Exhibits’. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Newcastle upon Tyne 3rd series 5(9), 102 Aitchison, W., 1950 ‘Note on Three Sculptured Rocks in North Northumberland’. History of the Berwickshire Naturalists’ Club 32(1), 50 Alcock, L 1977 ‘The Auld Wives’ Lifts’. Antiquity 51, 117-23 Aldhouse-Green, M., 2004 ‘Crowning Glories. The Language of Hair in Later Prehistoric Europe’. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 70, 299-325 Allott, C. & Allot, K., 2006 ‘Rock Art Indoors’.
    [Show full text]
  • DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE Report By
    DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE Report by Development Management Manager 1 DESCRIPTION Planning permission for the erection of a 34m high (80kw) wind turbine at Cathlawhill Farm, Near Torphichen. 2 DETAILS Reference no. 0471/FUL/10 Owner of Mr Andrew Gibbs site Cathlawhill Farm Torphichen EH48 4NW Applicant Mr Andrew Gibbs Ward & Linlithgow Cathlawhill Farm local Cllr Conn Torphichen members Cllr Day EH48 4NW Cllr Kerr Case officer Esme Clelland Contact Tel: 01506 775 223 details Email: [email protected] Reason for referral to Development Management Committee: Cllr Kerr referred the application to committee at the request of the applicant. 3 RECOMMENDATION 3.1 Refuse planning permission 4 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL AND PLANNING HISTORY 4.1 Planning permission is sought for a 34metre (to tip) wind turbine on land to the east of Cathlawhill Farm, Near Torphichen. The proposed turbine would have a tubular tower approximately 1 metre in diameter. The tower would be 25m to the centre of the rotor, with 2 blades and a rotor diameter of 18m. The turbine would have a potential output of 80kw. The application states that the lifetime of the turbine will be 25 years after which time the land would be reinstated. 4.2 The site is on a steeply sloping, north facing field, currently used for grazing cattle. The position of the proposed turbine is approximately 200m east-north-east of the applicant's Cathlawhill Farm, which is the nearest residential property. The site is within the countryside and the Bathgate Hills Area of Great Landscape Value as designated in the West Lothian Local Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • W W W .Jungsteinsite.De
    Burials and builders of Stonehenge: social identities November 26th, 2010 in Late Neolithic and Chalcolithic Britain Mike Parker Pearson with Christie Cox Willis Zusammenfassung Über die Identität der Erbauer von Stonehenge wurde schon lan- ge gerätselt. Vor fünfzig Jahren spekulierten Archäologen, mediter- rane oder ägyptische Architekten hätten lokale Barbaren beim Bau angeleitet. Die Ergebnisse der aktuellen Untersuchungen deuten an, dass die Vorbilder der Architektur allesamt bei bereits bekannten bri- tischen Traditionen im Monumentbau aus Wales und Wessex zu su- chen sind. Erste Ergebnisse osteologischer Untersuchungen demonstrieren, dass von den geschätzten 150 Menschen, die in Stonehenge bestat- tet sind, die 64 ausgegrabenen von einem ausgewählten Segment der Gesellschaft stammen. Neben zwei erwachsenen Frauen und zwei bis drei Kindern waren alle übrigen wohl adulte Männer. Die wenigen Grabbeigaben, die in diesen Brandgräbern gefunden wurden, deuten auf Individuen von religiöser oder politischer Auto- rität. Sie wurden in Stonehenge während der Zeit 3000–2300 cal BC bestattet und könnten eine oder mehrere Herrscherdynastien reprä- sentieren. Die erste Bauphase von Stonehenge (3000–2920 cal BC) fällt in eine Zeit steigender Uniformität der materiellen Kultur in Britanni- en, sowohl im Hinblick auf Keramikstile und Hengemonumente, als auch im Hinblick auf Hausformen. Seine Errichtung könnte geplant worden sein, um die verschiedenen Regionen Britanniens zu verei- nen, insbesondere die von Sandsteinen geprägte Wessexregion und die von Dolerit (Bluestone) geprägten Regionen in Wales. Die zweite Bauphase von Stonehenge (2620–2480 cal BC), als das Monument in etwa die heute sichtbare Form annahm, war mit einer großen Siedlung im nahegelegenen Durrington Walls assoziiert, die später zu einem Henge umgebaut und so monumentalisiert wurde.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Bradford Institutional Repository
    The University of Bradford Institutional Repository http://bradscholars.brad.ac.uk This work is made available online in accordance with publisher policies. Please refer to the repository record for this item and our Policy Document available from the repository home page for further information. To see the final version of this work please visit the publisher’s website. Access to the published online version may require a subscription. Link to publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/ Citation: Gibson AM, Neubauer W, Flöry S et al (2017) Survey and Excavation at the Henges of the Wharfe Valley, North Yorkshire, 2013-15. Archaeological Journal. Copyright statement: © 2017 Royal Archaeological Institute. Full-text reproduced in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. 1 Survey and Excavation at the Henges of the Wharfe Valley, North Yorkshire, 2013-15 Alex Gibson1 with Wolfgang Neubauer2, Sebastian Flöry2, Roland Filzwieser2, Erich Nau2, Petra Schneidhofer2 & Guglielmo Strapazzon2, Philippa Bradley3, Dana Challinor4, Charles French5, Alan Ogden1, Garry Rushworth6 and Alison Sheridan7 1 - School of Archaeological Sciences, University of Bradford 2 - Ludwig Boltzman Institute for Archaeological Prospection and Virtual Archaeology - University of Vienna. 3 - 23 Feversham Road, Salisbury, Wilts SP1 3PP 4 - School of Archaeology, University of Oxford 5 - Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Cambridge 6 - Butts Farm, Thurstonland, HD4 6XG 7 - National Museums Scotland INTRODUCTION Whilst the great Yorkshire henges such as those of the Thornborough complex in the A1 corridor are well known in the archaeological literature (Harding 2013) until recently, Yarnbury (near Grassington) and Castle Dykes (near Aysgarth) were the only two ‘henges’ known in the Yorkshire Dales (Harding with Lee 1987, Nos 217 & 205).
    [Show full text]
  • Transactions Dumfriesshire and Galloway Natural
    TRANSACTIONS of the DUMFRIESSHIRE AND GALLOWAY NATURAL HISTORY and ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY FOUNDED 20 NOVEMBER 1862 THIRD SERIES VOLUME 91 XCI Editors: DAVID F. DEVEREUX JAMES FOSTER ISSN 0141-1292 2017 DUMFRIES Published by the Council of the Society Office-Bearers 2016–2017 and Fellows of the Society President Dr Jeremy Brock Vice Presidents Mrs P.G. Williams, Mr R. Copland, Mr D. Dutton and Mr M. Cook Fellows of the Society Mr A.D. Anderson, Mr J.H.D. Gair, Dr J.B. Wilson, Mr K.H. Dobie, Mrs E. Toolis, Dr D.F. Devereux, Mrs M. Williams, Dr F. Toolis, Mr L. Murray and Mr L.J. Masters Hon. Secretary Mr J.L. Williams, Merkland, Kirkmahoe, Dumfries DG1 1SY Hon. Membership Secretary Mr S. McCulloch, 28 Main Street, New Abbey, Dumfries DG2 8BY Hon. Treasurer Mrs A. Weighill Hon. Librarian Mr R. Coleman, 2 Loreburn Park, Dumfries DG1 1LS Hon. Institutional Subscriptions Secretary Mrs A. Weighill Hon. Editors Mrs E. Kennedy, Nether Carruchan, Troqueer, Dumfries DG2 8LY Dr J. Foster (Webmaster), 21 Maxwell Street, Dumfries DG2 7AP Hon. Syllabus Conveners Miss S. Ratchford, Tadorna, Hollands Farm Road, Caerlaverock, Dumfries DG1 4RS Mrs A. Clarke, 4 Redhall Road, Templand, Lockerbie DG11 1TF Hon. Curators Mrs J. Turner and Miss S. Ratchford Hon. Outings Organisers Mr D. Dutton Ordinary Members Dr Jeanette Brock, Mr D. Scott and Mr J. McKinnell CONTENTS A Case of Mistaken Identity? Monenna and Ninian in Galloway and the Central Belt by Oisin Plumb .................................................................. 9 Angles and Britons around Trusty’s Hill: some onomastic considerations by Alan James ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cairnpapple Hill, West Lothian, 1947-48
    V. THE EXCAVATIONS AT CAIRNPAPPLE HILL, WEST LOTHIAN, 1947-48. BY STUART PIGGOTT, B.Lirr., F.S.A., F.S.A.Scoi., Professo Prehistorif o r c Archaeolog Universite th n yi Edinburghf yo . (The cost of publishing this paper has been partially defrayed by a grant from the Council for British Archaeology.) CONTENTS. PAGE SUMMARY . .69 INTRODUCTION : The Site and its Setting ......... 70 Visible Structure . .7 . s 2befor . e Excavatio . n Circumstance Method san Excavatio f do n ....4 7 . 1 Tain court documents in Old Ross-shire and Scotland (W. Macgill, B.A.), vol. i., No. 245, p. 94, 1 Scenes and Legends,. 80 . p EXCAVATIONS AT CAIRNPAPPLE HILL, WEST LOTHIAN. 69 DESCRIPTION : PAOE The Site as Revealed by the Excavations Perio . dI .........6 7 . Period II The Bank and Ditch ....... 81 The Stone-holes ........ 83 The Pits .......... 86 The Hearths . .88 . .8 . 8 . Th . e Grave . s Period III . .9 . 2 . The Cair. Inned nan r. Kerb . .9 . 5 . Th e. Cists Period IV . .98 The Cairn Enlargement and Outer Kerb . .98 The Burials ........9 9 . Period V .......... 100 The Finds . .. ..10 . 1 . Perio . dI Period II .......... 104 Period III . 107 Perio V dI ......... 8 10 . .11 . 1 . Th e. Stone-Robbin . g DISCUSSION -. Perio dI ..........2 11 . 4 11 . Perio I dI Period III . .115 Period IV . .116 Perio dV ...........7 11 . Evidence of Climatic Changes . 118 TECHNICAL APPENDICES A-G ........ 120 SUMMARY. In Late Neolithic times, about 2000 B.C., a site was chosen for a sanctuary and cemeter hilltoa n yo p overlookin Firte gth Fort f ho e milex th hsi o st north, and within the 1000-foot contour.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stones of Stenness, Orkney by J N Graham Ritchie with an Account of the Stone of Odin by Ernest W Marwick
    The Stones of Stenness, Orkney by J N Graham Ritchie with an account of the Stone of Odin by Ernest W Marwick INTRODUCTION The central bowl of West Mainland Orkney, encircled by low rolling hills, encloses the adjoining Lochs of Harray and Stenness; separated by the promontories of Stenness to the SE and Brodgar to the NW, the lochs meet only at the Bridge of Brodgar which spans the narrows and links two of the most important assemblages of prehistoric monuments in Britain (fig 1). To the NW are the ditched cairn of the Ring of Bookan (ORK 45), the class II henge monument known as the Ring of Brodgar, a large number of mounds and several standing stones; to the SE are the class I henge monument of the Stones of Stenness, a series of standing stones and, 1-2 km to the E, the magnificent chambered tomb of Macs Howe (ORK 36). The Standing Stones of Stenness (NGR HY 307125) dominate the W side of the SE promontory and are situated in a level arable field close to the shore at a height of about 4-0 m OD (pis 3a and 4a). Two existing outlying stones, the Watch Stone and the Barnhouse Stone, may be associated with the monument, the former 170 m to the NNW and the latter 700 m to the SE (pi 3b and d; RCAMS 1946, 304-5, nos 879 and 880). The stump of another standing stone, situated about 12-8 m SSW of the Watch Stone, was discovered in 1930 but is no longer visible; measuring 1-4 m by 0-13 m and at least 0-9 m in height, 'it had rested in a hole which had been cut in the shaly rock to receive it, and it was packed at the base with small stones' (RCAMS 1946, 320, no.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neolithic Cremation Cemetery at Forteviot, Strathearn, Perth & Kinross, Scotland, and Its Comparanda
    Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 83, 2017, pp. 213–245 © The Prehistoric Society. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http: //creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. doi:10.1017/ppr.2017.11 First published online 4 October 2017 Cremation Practices and the Creation of Monument Complexes: The Neolithic Cremation Cemetery at Forteviot, Strathearn, Perth & Kinross, Scotland, and its comparanda By GORDON NOBLE1 and KENNETH BROPHY2 With contributions by DEREK HAMILTON3, STEPHANY LEACH4 and ALISON SHERIDAN5 Around the beginning of the 3rd millennium cal BC a cremation cemetery was established at Forteviot, central Scotland. This place went on to become one of the largest monument complexes identified in Mainland Scotland, with the construction of a palisaded enclosure, timber structures, and a series of henge monuments and other enclosures. The cemetery was established between 3080 and 2900 cal BC, probably in the 30th century cal BC,which is contemporary with the cremation cemetery at Stonehenge. Nine discrete deposits of cremated bone, representing the remains of at least 18 people, were identified. In most instances they were placed within cut features and, in one case, a series of cremation deposits was associated with a broken standing stone. This paper includes the first detailed assessment of the cremated remains at Forteviot and the features associated with the cemetery, and explores how the establishment of this cemetery may have been both a catalyst and inspiration for the elaborate monument building and prolonged acts of remembrance that occurred at this location over a period of almost 1000 years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Significance of Monuments
    The Significance of Monuments The Neolithic period, when agriculture began and many monuments were constructed, is an era fraught with paradoxes and ambiguities. Students of prehistory have long found the highly theoretical interpretations of the period perplexing and contradictory. Starting in the Mesolithic and carrying his analysis through to the Late Bronze Age, Richard Bradley sheds light on this complex period and the changing consciousness of the people who lived at the time. The book studies the importance of monuments, tracing their history for nearly three millennia from their first creation over six thousand years ago. Part I discusses how monuments developed and their role in forming a new sense of time and space among the inhabitants of prehistoric Europe. Such features of the landscape as mounds and enclosures are also examined in detail. Through a series of case studies, Part II considers how monuments were modified and reinterpreted to suit the changing needs of society. The Significance of Monuments is an indispensable text for all students of European prehistory. It is also an enlightening read for professional archaeologists and all those interested in this fascinating period. Richard Bradley is Professor of Archaeology at Reading University. Current interests include landscape archaeology and rock art. Recent books include Altering the Earth and Rock Art and the Prehistory of Atlantic Europe. The Significance of Monuments On the shaping of human experience in Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe Richard Bradley London and New York First published 1998 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foula Report Single Pages
    The Foula Landscape Project Geophysical Survey at Harrier 4th – 11th May 2006 Conducted by The Bath and Camerton Archaeological Society for Foula Heritage The Da Heights landscape on the Shetland island of Foula. (FLP06) SEASON 3 (4/05/06 – 11/05/06) The Foula Landscape Project Geophysical Survey at Harrier 4th – 11th May 2006 Conducted by The Bath and Camerton Archaeological Society for Foula Heritage This report was prepared by Dr John Oswin MA PhD CSci, Jayne Lawes MA MIFA, Keith Turner and Bridget Hetzel MA Geophysics images prepared by Keith Turner. Editor: Bridget Hetzel (FLP06) SEASON 3 (4/05/06 – 11/05/06) i ii Summary At the instigation of Foula Heritage, the Bath and Camerton Archaeological Society undertook an eight day geophysical survey in the region of Harrier, on the Shetland island of Foula, during May 2006. The survey was carried out using a magnetometer and a twin-probe resistance meter, with ancillary measurements of relief obtained by an EDM and a hand held GPS meter. The survey was centred on the North Harrier area with a smaller survey conducted on Da Heights, a few hundred metres to the north. In addition a survey was also carried out at Springs on the northern foreshore, a site threatened by coastal erosion. The main survey at North Harrier confirmed the presence of buried structures in the yard behind Old North Harrier House and burnt mounds in the places stated in earlier work. In addition the survey also indicated probable prehistoric settlements both on the hill slope to the north of Old North Harrier House and near the burnt mounds to the west of the Harrier Burn.
    [Show full text]
  • Cairnpapple Hill
    Property in Care (PIC) ID: PIC 130 Designations: Scheduled Monument (SM90053) Taken into State care: 1948 (Guardianship) Last reviewed: 2013 HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT SCOTLAND STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE CAIRNPAPPLE HILL We continually revise our Statements of Significance, so they may vary in length, format and level of detail. While every effort is made to keep them up to date, they should not be considered a definitive or final assessment of our properties. Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH CAIRNPAPPLE HILL SYNOPSIS Cairnpapple Hill is one of the best-known prehistoric sites on the mainland of Scotland. Archaeological excavations in 1947-8 revealed that the place had been the focus of communal activity for over 200 generations of local farmers, from the early Neolithic (c. 3800 BC) through to the early Christian era. The discoveries included early Neolithic pottery and axes, a later Neolithic henge monument, used for ceremonial purposes, three Bronze-Age burial cairns, and four long-cist burials dating to the first millennium AD. The site was taken into state care immediately following the excavations, and a concrete dome – today, the most conspicuous feature of the complex - was constructed over the second-phase Bronze-Age cairn, both to preserve the graves and present them to the public. An introductory display is located in an adjacent WWII Nissen hut. The site, situated atop the broad, slightly convex summit of Cairnpapple Hill, a prominent feature in the Bathgate Hills, commands extensive views to west, north and east, across the Forth valley and beyond.
    [Show full text]