Goodia Lotifolia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Goodia lotifolia Family: Fabaceae subfamily Faboideae Distribution: A widespread species occurring in Western Australia, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, New South Wales and Queensland. Common Golden tip Name: Derivation of Goodia...after Peter Good, a botanical Name: collector. lotifolia...having leaves like the genus Lotus. Conservation Not considered to be at risk in the wild. Status: General Description: Goodia is a genus of only two species. G. lotifolia is a common pea-flowered plant of moist eucalypt forests or of dry forests in protected situations. There are two recognised varieties; var.lotifolia and var.pubescens. The latter (which is found in Tasmania and Victoria) is characterised by having short hairs on branches, flower stalks and on the under-surface of the leaves, and is sometimes regarded as a separate species (G.pubescens). Goodia lotifolia Photo: Brian Walters Goodia lotifolia is a small to medium, spreading shrub of fairly open habit. It may reach 3 metres high is some situations but is usually smaller in open positions. The leaves are glossy, blue-green and divided into three leaflets. The typical "pea" flowers consist of 4 petals; the "standard", the "keel" and two "wings" as shown in the diagram. In Goodia lotifolia the flowers are bright yellow with a red centre, about 12 mm in diameter and occur profusely in spring. This plant has been in cultivation for many years but does not seem to be grown as widely as it deserves. It is generally a very hardy garden plant which is suited to a range of soil types, provided drainage is good. It will grow in full sun but is more attractive in dappled shade. It should not be allowed to dry out. Propagation is easy from seed following pre-treatment to break the physical dormancy provided by the impervious seed coat. Pre-treatment can be carried out by abrasion or by the use of boiling water (further details can be found in the Seed Propagation page). The seed retains viability for many years. Cuttings strike well using firm, current season's growth..

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Fruits and Seeds of Genera in the Subfamily Faboideae (Fabaceae)
Fruits and Seeds of United States Department of Genera in the Subfamily Agriculture Agricultural Faboideae (Fabaceae) Research Service Technical Bulletin Number 1890 Volume I December 2003 United States Department of Agriculture Fruits and Seeds of Agricultural Research Genera in the Subfamily Service Technical Bulletin Faboideae (Fabaceae) Number 1890 Volume I Joseph H. Kirkbride, Jr., Charles R. Gunn, and Anna L. Weitzman Fruits of A, Centrolobium paraense E.L.R. Tulasne. B, Laburnum anagyroides F.K. Medikus. C, Adesmia boronoides J.D. Hooker. D, Hippocrepis comosa, C. Linnaeus. E, Campylotropis macrocarpa (A.A. von Bunge) A. Rehder. F, Mucuna urens (C. Linnaeus) F.K. Medikus. G, Phaseolus polystachios (C. Linnaeus) N.L. Britton, E.E. Stern, & F. Poggenburg. H, Medicago orbicularis (C. Linnaeus) B. Bartalini. I, Riedeliella graciliflora H.A.T. Harms. J, Medicago arabica (C. Linnaeus) W. Hudson. Kirkbride is a research botanist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, BARC West Room 304, Building 011A, Beltsville, MD, 20705-2350 (email = [email protected]). Gunn is a botanist (retired) from Brevard, NC (email = [email protected]). Weitzman is a botanist with the Smithsonian Institution, Department of Botany, Washington, DC. Abstract Kirkbride, Joseph H., Jr., Charles R. Gunn, and Anna L radicle junction, Crotalarieae, cuticle, Cytiseae, Weitzman. 2003. Fruits and seeds of genera in the subfamily Dalbergieae, Daleeae, dehiscence, DELTA, Desmodieae, Faboideae (Fabaceae). U. S. Department of Agriculture, Dipteryxeae, distribution, embryo, embryonic axis, en- Technical Bulletin No. 1890, 1,212 pp. docarp, endosperm, epicarp, epicotyl, Euchresteae, Fabeae, fracture line, follicle, funiculus, Galegeae, Genisteae, Technical identification of fruits and seeds of the economi- gynophore, halo, Hedysareae, hilar groove, hilar groove cally important legume plant family (Fabaceae or lips, hilum, Hypocalypteae, hypocotyl, indehiscent, Leguminosae) is often required of U.S.
[Show full text]
Native Plant Identification CONTACT in the Northern and Yorke Region
Government of South Australia Northern and Yorke Natural FACT SHEET NO 2.018 Resources Management Board September 2011 NRM Plan Native plant identification CONTACT In the Northern and Yorke Region Main Office Basic plant identification is a vital skill for Northern and Yorke NRM Board land managers. It assists in appreciating PO Box 175 the vegetation around you and managing 41-49 Eyre Road that vegetation. Does a plant belong on a Crystal Brook SA 5523 site or is it a weed? Ph: (08) 8636 2361 Fx: (08) 8636 2371 This fact sheet introduces some of the www.nynrm.sa.gov.au common plant groups of the Northern and Yorke Region and how to identify them. All living things have been categorized into what is known as the Linnaean System of classification. Plants are grouped using common attributes until each plant is given a unique Classification. The steps of Classification are: • Kingdom • Division • Class • Order • Family • Subfamily • Genus • Species This results in a unique Botanical or Scientific name consisting of Genus and Species. Some plants are further split into sub species. Most plants have at least one common name. These are non scientific and often vary from region to region. Some plants may have the same common name, this often causes confusion so it is important to use the Botanical name. The plants right would be referred to as Eucalyptus leucoxylon subspecies leucoxylon or the South Australian Blue Gum. This plant is known as Yellow Gum in Victoria. Glossary of common botanical terms Annual A plant that completes its life within one year.
[Show full text]
Post-Fire Recovery of Woody Plants in the New England Tableland Bioregion
Post-fire recovery of woody plants in the New England Tableland Bioregion Peter J. ClarkeA, Kirsten J. E. Knox, Monica L. Campbell and Lachlan M. Copeland Botany, School of Environmental and Rural Sciences, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, AUSTRALIA. ACorresponding author; email: [email protected] Abstract: The resprouting response of plant species to fire is a key life history trait that has profound effects on post-fire population dynamics and community composition. This study documents the post-fire response (resprouting and maturation times) of woody species in six contrasting formations in the New England Tableland Bioregion of eastern Australia. Rainforest had the highest proportion of resprouting woody taxa and rocky outcrops had the lowest. Surprisingly, no significant difference in the median maturation length was found among habitats, but the communities varied in the range of maturation times. Within these communities, seedlings of species killed by fire, mature faster than seedlings of species that resprout. The slowest maturing species were those that have canopy held seed banks and were killed by fire, and these were used as indicator species to examine fire immaturity risk. Finally, we examine whether current fire management immaturity thresholds appear to be appropriate for these communities and find they need to be amended. Cunninghamia (2009) 11(2): 221–239 Introduction Maturation times of new recruits for those plants killed by fire is also a critical biological variable in the context of fire Fire is a pervasive ecological factor that influences the regimes because this time sets the lower limit for fire intervals evolution, distribution and abundance of woody plants that can cause local population decline or extirpation (Keith (Whelan 1995; Bond & van Wilgen 1996; Bradstock et al.
[Show full text]
The First Complete Chloroplast Genome of the Genistoid Legume
Annals of Botany 113: 1197–1210, 2014 doi:10.1093/aob/mcu050, available online at www.aob.oxfordjournals.org The first complete chloroplast genome of the Genistoid legume Lupinus luteus: evidence for a novel major lineage-specific rearrangement and new insights regarding plastome evolution in the legume family Guillaume E. Martin1,†‡, Mathieu Rousseau-Gueutin1,†, Solenn Cordonnier1, Oscar Lima1, Sophie Michon-Coudouel2, Delphine Naquin1,§, Julie Ferreira de Carvalho1, Malika Aı¨nouche1, Armel Salmon1 and Abdelkader Aı¨nouche1,* 1UMR CNRS 6553 Ecobio, OSUR (Observatoire des Sciences de l’Univers de Rennes), Universite´ de Rennes 1/Universite´ Europeénne de Bretagne, 35 042 Rennes, France and 2Plate-forme Geńomique Environnementale et Fonctionnelle, OSUR-CNRS, Universite´ de Rennes 1, 35042 Rennes, France †These two authors contributed equally to this work Downloaded from ‡Present address: CIRAD (Centre de coope´ration Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le De´veloppement), UMR AGAP, F-34398 Montpellier, France §Present address: Plate-forme IMAGIF, FRC3115 CNRS, 91198 Gif sur Yvette Cedex, France * For correspondence. E-mail [email protected] Received: 10 December 2013 Returned for revision: 3 February 2014 Accepted: 26 February 2014 Published electronically: 25 April 2014 http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/ † Background and Aims To date chloroplast genomes are available only for members of the non-protein amino acid- accumulating clade (NPAAA) Papilionoid lineages in the legume family (i.e. Millettioids, Robinoids and the ‘inverted repeat-lacking clade’, IRLC). It is thus very important to sequence plastomes from other lineages in order to better understand the unusual evolution observed in this model flowering plant family. To this end, the plas- tome of a lupine species, Lupinus luteus, was sequenced to represent the Genistoid lineage, a noteworthy but poorly studied legume group.
[Show full text]
Rbcl and Legume Phylogeny, with Particular Reference to Phaseoleae, Millettieae, and Allies Tadashi Kajita; Hiroyoshi Ohashi; Yoichi Tateishi; C
rbcL and Legume Phylogeny, with Particular Reference to Phaseoleae, Millettieae, and Allies Tadashi Kajita; Hiroyoshi Ohashi; Yoichi Tateishi; C. Donovan Bailey; Jeff J. Doyle Systematic Botany, Vol. 26, No. 3. (Jul. - Sep., 2001), pp. 515-536. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0363-6445%28200107%2F09%2926%3A3%3C515%3ARALPWP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-C Systematic Botany is currently published by American Society of Plant Taxonomists. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/aspt.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
[Show full text]
Kea (Nestor Notabilis) Care Manual
Kea (Nestor notabilis) CARE MANUAL CREATED BY THE AZA Kea Species Survival Plan® Program IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE AZA Parrot Taxon Advisory Group Kea (Nestor notabilis) Care Manual Kea (Nestor notabilis) Care Manual Published by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums in collaboration with the AZA Animal Welfare Committee Formal Citation: AZA Kea Species Survival Plan (Nestor notabilis). (2020). Kea Care Manual. Silver Spring, MD: Association of Zoos and Aquariums. Original Completion Date: July 1, 2019 Kea (Nestor notabilis) Care Manual Coordinator: Kimberly Klosterman, Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden, Senior Avian Keeper, Kea SSP Vice Coordinator Authors and Significant Contributors: Krista Adlehart CRM, Woodland Park Zoo, Animal Management Registrar Amanda Ardente NVM, PhD, Walt Disney World, University of Florida, Nutrition Fellow Jackie Bray, MA Zoology CPBT-KA, Raptor Incorporated, Associate Director Cassandre Crawford MM, Northwest Local School District, Orchestra Director, Kea SSP Volunteer Thea Etchells, Denver Zoo, Bird Keeper Linda Henry, Board Member of Zoological Lighting Institute, SeaWorld San Diego Phillip Horvey, Sedgwick County Zoo, Senior Zookeeper, Masked Lapwing SSP Coordinator and Studbook Keeper Cari Inserra, San Diego Zoo, Lead Animal Trainer Kimberly Klosterman, Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden, Senior Avian Keeper, Kea Care Manual Coordinator, Vice Coordinator Kea SSP Program Jessica Meehan, Denver Zoo, Bird Keeper, Kea SSP Coordinator and Studbook Keeper Jennifer Nollman DVM, Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden, Associate Veterinarian Catherine Vine, Philadelphia Zoo, Avian Keeper Reviewers: Raoul Schwing PhD, Head of Kea Lab & Infrastructure Project Manager, Messerli Research Institute, University of Vienna, AU Tamsin Orr-Walker, BAAT, Co-founder, Trustee & Chair of Kea Conservation Trust, South Island Community Engagement Coordinator, NZ Nigel Simpson, EAZA Kea EEP Coordinator, Head of Operations, Wild Place Project, Bristol Zoological Society, UK Dr.rer.nat Gyula K.
[Show full text]
The First Complete Chloroplast Genome of the Genistoid
The first complete chloroplast genome of the Genistoid legume Lupinus luteus: evidence for a novel major lineage-specific rearrangement and new insights regarding plastome evolution in the legume family Guillaume E. Martin, Mathieu Rousseau-Gueutin, Solenn Cordonnier, Oscar Lima, Sophie Michon-Coudouel, Delphine Naquin, Julie Ferreira de Carvalho, Malika L. Aïnouche, Armel Salmon, Abdelkader Aïnouche To cite this version: Guillaume E. Martin, Mathieu Rousseau-Gueutin, Solenn Cordonnier, Oscar Lima, Sophie Michon- Coudouel, et al.. The first complete chloroplast genome of the Genistoid legume Lupinus luteus: evi- dence for a novel major lineage-specific rearrangement and new insights regarding plastome evolution in the legume family. Annals of Botany, Oxford University Press (OUP), 2014, 113 (7), pp.1197-1210. 10.1093/aob/mcu050. hal-01061902 HAL Id: hal-01061902 https://hal-univ-rennes1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01061902 Submitted on 8 Sep 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1! ‘ORIGINAL ARTICLE’ 2! 3! The first complete chloroplast genome of the genistoid legume Lupinus luteus: Evidence for a 4! novel major lineage-specific rearrangement and new insights on plastome evolution in the 5! legume family 6! 7! Authors 8! Guillaume E.
[Show full text]
Species List
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
[Show full text]
Lesson 1 PLANT IDENTIFICATION Aim Explain the Binomial System Of
Lesson 1 PLANT IDENTIFICATION Aim Explain the binomial system of plant classification and demonstrate identification of plant species through the ability of using botanical descriptions for leaf shapes and flowers. This first lesson sets the stage, so to speak, for the remainder of the course. As such, it has considerably more reading than most of the other lessons. Read the material thoroughly and understand what you are reading, but do not get bogged down in trying to remember every detail. Horticulture deals with living things and as such is somewhat unpredictable and variable. The way you treat a plant is different from place to place, time to time and according to what you are trying to get from the plant. When referring to a book or magazine article, always look at where it was written and who it was written by (e.g. most gardening writers usually write about gardening in their own locality. If you live in a different city those recommendations might be quite misleading for you!). There can be great variations over relatively small distances in such things as rainfall, wind and soil type. A certain type of tree might very well grow twice as tall in the eastern suburbs of a large city as the height it grows in the western suburbs of the same city. In horticulture, often there are different ways of tackling a job; each one just as valid as the next. Never consider that a particular technique is the only way of doing something! You should try to be aware of the advantages and disadvantages of all of the alternatives.
[Show full text]
Frankston Vegetation Study 2006
Frankston Vegetation Study 2006 Project 05-5 Planning Review Prepared for: Frankston City Council Ecology Australia Pty Ltd Flora and Fauna Consultants 88B Station Street, Fairfield, Victoria, Australia 3078 Tel: (03) 9489 4191 Fax: (03) 9481 7679 www.ecologyaustralia.com.au [email protected] Copyright 2006 Ecology Australia Pty Ltd This publication is copyright. It may only be used in accordance with the agreed terms of the commission. Except as provided for by the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, without prior written permission of Ecology Australia Pty Ltd. Document information This is a controlled document. Details of the document ownership, location, distribution, status and revision history and are listed below. All comments or requests for changes to content should be addressed to the document owner. Owner Ecology Australia Pty Ltd Author Sarah Bedggood, Lisa Crowfoot, Nina Roberts, Cherie Campbell, Jamie McMahon and Ann McGregor Location Frankston Vegetation Study 2006.doc Document History Status Changes By Date Draft Draft 0.1 Sarah Bedggood 07/04/06 Final Draft Draft 0.2 Sarah Bedggood 12/05/2006 Final final Sarah Bedggood 02/08/2006 Final Frankston Vegetation Study 2006 with maps & App 4.doc i Frankston Vegetation Study 2006 Contents Summary 1 1 Introduction 2 2 Study Area 3 3 Methods 4 3.1 Literature review 4 3.2 GIS 4 3.3 Taxonomy 5 3.4 Field surveys 5 4 Vegetation 7 4.1 Ecological Vegetation Classes 7 4.2 EVC Descriptions 11 4.3 Significance of vegetation 34 5 Management Issues 36 6 Review of legislation and planning controls relating to native vegetation 39 6.1 Legislation and policies for native vegetation protection 39 6.2 Native vegetation protection in the Frankston Planning Scheme 48 7 Recommendations 51 8 Acknowlegements 53 9 References 54 Tables Table 1.
[Show full text]
A New Subfamily Classification of The
LPWG Phylogeny and classification of the Leguminosae TAXON 66 (1) • February 2017: 44–77 A new subfamily classification of the Leguminosae based on a taxonomically comprehensive phylogeny The Legume Phylogeny Working Group (LPWG) Recommended citation: LPWG (2017) This paper is a product of the Legume Phylogeny Working Group, who discussed, debated and agreed on the classification of the Leguminosae presented here, and are listed in alphabetical order. The text, keys and descriptions were written and compiled by a subset of authors indicated by §. Newly generated matK sequences were provided by a subset of authors indicated by *. All listed authors commented on and approved the final manuscript. Nasim Azani,1 Marielle Babineau,2* C. Donovan Bailey,3* Hannah Banks,4 Ariane R. Barbosa,5* Rafael Barbosa Pinto,6* James S. Boatwright,7* Leonardo M. Borges,8* Gillian K. Brown,9* Anne Bruneau,2§* Elisa Candido,6* Domingos Cardoso,10§* Kuo-Fang Chung,11* Ruth P. Clark,4 Adilva de S. Conceição,12* Michael Crisp,13* Paloma Cubas,14* Alfonso Delgado-Salinas,15 Kyle G. Dexter,16* Jeff J. Doyle,17 Jérôme Duminil,18* Ashley N. Egan,19* Manuel de la Estrella,4§* Marcus J. Falcão,20 Dmitry A. Filatov,21* Ana Paula Fortuna-Perez,22* Renée H. Fortunato,23 Edeline Gagnon,2* Peter Gasson,4 Juliana Gastaldello Rando,24* Ana Maria Goulart de Azevedo Tozzi,6 Bee Gunn,13* David Harris,25 Elspeth Haston,25 Julie A. Hawkins,26* Patrick S. Herendeen,27§ Colin E. Hughes,28§* João R.V. Iganci,29* Firouzeh Javadi,30* Sheku Alfred Kanu,31 Shahrokh Kazempour-Osaloo,32* Geoffrey C.
[Show full text]
Generic Delimitation and Phylogenetic Uncertainty: an Example from a Group That Has Undergone an Explosive Radiation
CSIRO PUBLISHING www.publish.csiro.au/journals/asb Australian Systematic Botany 18, 41–47 Generic delimitation and phylogenetic uncertainty: an example from a group that has undergone an explosive radiation L. A. OrthiaA,B, L. G. CookA and M. D. CrispA ASchool of Botany and Zoology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia. BCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Phylogenetic trees can provide a stable basis for a higher-level classification of organisms that reflects evolutionary relationships. However, some lineages have a complex evolutionary history that involves explosive radiation or hybridisation. Such histories have become increasingly apparent with the use of DNA sequence data for phylogeny estimation and explain, in part, past difficulties in producing stable morphology-based classifications for some groups. We illustrate this situation by using the example of tribe Mirbelieae (Fabaceae), whose generic classification has been fraught for decades. In particular, we discuss a recent proposal to combine 19 of the 25 Mirbelieae genera into a single genus, Pultenaea sens. lat., and how we might find stable and consistent ways to squeeze something as complex as life into little boxes for our own convenience. Why name and classify organisms? binomials) usually assume that species in the same genus Giving names to things and placing them in classification are more closely related to each other than to species frameworks are common human activities. There are many in other genera. To satisfy that assumption of relatedness possible ways to name and classify organisms, with in an evolutionary sense, and to make classification different classification systems reflecting different needs or predictive, monophyly is used as the primary criterion for priorities.
[Show full text]