DOCSLIB.ORG

Statistical Design, Analysis and Graphics for the Guadalupe River Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Statistical Design, Analysis and Graphics for the Guadalupe River Assessment Statistical Design, Analysis and Graphics for the Guadalupe River Assessment Technical Memoranda Two, Four & Five Report prepared for the Santa Clara Valley Water District Agreement Number A3562F by San Francisco Estuary Institute & Aquatic Science Center CONTRIBUTION NO. 687 FEBRUARY 2013 SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY INSTITUTE & THE AQUATIC SCIENCE CENTER 4911 Central Ave, Richmond, CA 94804, p: 510-746-7334 f: 510-746-7300 This report should be cited as: San Francisco Estuary Institute & Aquatic Science Center (2013). Statistical Design, Analysis and Graphics for the Guadalupe River Assessment. Technical Memoranda Two, Four & Five. Report prepared for the Santa Clara Valley Water District Agreement Number A3562F. Contribution No. 687. Richmond, California. For more information, contact: Sarah Lowe, (510) 746-7384 or [email protected] TableofContents TableofContents..............................................................................................................................................i ListofFiguresandTables...........................................................................................................................iii Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1 ManagementQuestions................................................................................................................................1 GeographicSetting.........................................................................................................................................2 Methods.............................................................................................................................................................3 Level-1MappingMethods........................................................................................................................3 Level-2RapidAssessmentMethods............................................. .........................................................7 StudyDesign..............................................................................................................................................................................7 CRAMFieldAssessments..................................................................................................................................................10 DataAnalysesoftheCRAMResults............................................................................................................................10 Results.............................................................................................................................................................11 Extent,Distribution,andOwnershipoftheStreams......................................................................11 1)Whatistheextentanddistributionofstreamecosystemresources?................................................11 2)Whatistheextentanddistributionofstreamassociatedriparianareas?.......................................13 3)Whatistheextentanddistributionofnon-riverinewetlands?.............................................................17 4)Whoownsthestreams?..............................................................................................................................................19 5)Howandwherearethestreamsinterrupted?................................................................................................21 StreamEcosystemConditionBasedonGuadalupeRiverCRAMAssessments........................23 1)Whataretheconditionsofstreamecosystemresources?........................................................................24 2)WhatarethelikelystressorsimpactingstreamconditionbasedonCRAM?..................................32 3)WhataretheLevelsofService(LOS)forstreamecosystemresources?...........................................37 StreamConditionRisks..........................................................................................................................38 i 1)Whatarethelikelysourcesofrisktostreamecosystemresources?..................................................38 2)Whatisthelikelihoodthatsourcesofriskmayimpactstreamecosystemconditions?...........39 3)Whatarethelikelyconsequencesoftheseriskstostreamecosystemcondition?......................39 4)Whatarethefundamentalriskstostreamecosystemsrepresentedbyclimatechange?........40 References......................................................................................................................................................43 AppendixAGuadalupeRiverCRAMAssessmentResults2012....................................................47 ii ListofFiguresandTables Figure1.MapoftheGuadalupeRiverwatershedboundaryandstreamnetworkforthefreshwater reachesofthestreams............................................................................................................................4 Figure2.MapshowingtheGuadalupeRiverwatershedCRAMassessmentstudyarea...........................8 Figure3.MapoftheaquaticresourcesintheGuadalupeRiverwatershedbasedonBAARI....12 Figure4.Distributionoftheestimatedriparianareasbyfunctionalwidthclass.....................................15 Figure5.Lengthsofstreamswithriparianareasbyfunctionalwidthclass.............................................16 Figure6.Comparisonofthedistributionofhistorical(circa1850)(mapA)andmodern(mapB)aquatic resources..............................................................................................................................................18 Figure7.Comparisonofhistorical(circa1850)andmodernstreamlengthsfortheGuadalupeRiver valleyfloor............................................................................................................................................19 Figure8.MapoflandsownedbytheDistrict.........................................................................................20 Figure9.ProportionsofstreamsintheGuadalupewatershedwithinmunicipalboundaries.................21 Figure10.Mapofstormdrains(channelconnectors),highwaysandroadsthatinterruptthestream network.................................................................................................................................................22 Figure11.MapshowingthedistributionofassessedandrejectedCRAMRiverineAAs.........................23 Figure12.Plotofthecumulativedistributionfunction(CDF)ofCRAMIndexScoresfortheGuadalupe Riverwatershed....................................................................................................................................25 Figure13.Plotsofthecumulativedistributionfunctions(CDFs)ofCRAMIndexScoresfortheurban(n= 30AAs)andnon-urbanstreams(n=23AAs).........................................................................................27 Figure14.Plotsofthecumulativedistributionfunctions(CDFs)ofCRAMIndexScoresfortheGuadalupe Riverwatershed(n=53)andCoyoteCreekwatershed(n=77).................................................................28 Figure15.Plotsofcumulativedistributionfunctions(CDFs)forCRAMIndexScoresfortheGuadalupe Riverwatershed(n=53)andStatewideRiverineAssessment.................................................................29 Figure16.DistributionofCRAMAAsbasedonequalintervalhealthclasses.........................................31 Figure17.MedianCRAMIndexandAttributescoresforurbanarea(n=30),non-urbanarea(n=23)and entireGuadalupeRiverwatershed(n=53).............................................................................................32 Figure18.MedianCRAMIndexandAttributescoresfortheGuadalupeRiverwatershed(n=53)andthe CoyoteCreekwatershed(n=77..............................................................................................................33 Figure19.EcologicalServiceIndex(ESI)fortheGuadalupeRiverwatershed..........................................37 FigureA-1.MapofCRAMAssessmentAreas(AAs)sampledintheGuadalupeRiverAssessment,201248 Table1.Descriptionofaquaticresourcespresentedinthemapsinthisreport.......................................5 Table2.SummaryofGuadalupeRiverAssessmentGRTSparametersforthesampledraw.....................9 Table3.SummaryofthelengthofsurfacechannelsandstormdrainsintheGuadalupeRiverwatershed ..............................................................................................................................................................11 Table4.Milesofstream-associatedriparianareasforeachoffiveriparianwidthclasses.....................13 Table5.SummaryofCRAMIndexScoresfortheGuadalupeRiver........................................................24 watershedbasedontheCRAMsurvey2012..........................................................................................24 iii Table6.StreamhealthconditionbasedontheequalintervalhealthclassesfortheGuadalupeRiverand CoyoteCreekwatersheds......................................................................................................................32 Table7.MeanmetricscoresfortheBufferandLandscapeContextAttributeandfortheHydrology Attributeinurbanandnon-urbanareasoftheGuadalupeRiverwatershed..........................................34 Table8.SummaryoftheCRAMStressorChecklist.................................................................................35 Table9.Listofpossiblelandscaperesponsestoclimatechange............................................................41 TableA-1.AssessmentAreadescriptions,fieldteams,andfinalCRAMscoresfortheGuadalupeRiver Assessment,2012..................................................................................................................................49
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Foster City, a Planned Community in the San Francisco Bay Area
    FOS T ER CI T Y - A NEW CI T Y ON T HE BAY A TRIBU T E T O PROFESSOR MI C HAEL MCDOUGALL KAL V IN PLATT As a tribute to Michael McDougall, long-time friend and colleague, Kalvin Platt revisits the Kalvin Platt, FAIA, is project for Foster City, a planned community in the San Francisco Bay Area. Mike was a Chairman of the SWA Group, an International principal planner and designer of this successful story of a new community which, as early Planning and Landscape as 1958, pioneered several planning and urban design maxims that we value today in good Architectural consulting place-making and sustainability. Foster City is a lesson for all of us. firm with 7 offices and award winning projects around the world. Mr. Platt has In the early 1960s; when I came to California as a planner and joined Wilsey, Ham, and Blair, an extensive experience Engineering and Planning Company in Millbrae; I met Michael McDougall. He was working on Foster in Planning New Towns and Communities, City, a new town along the San Francisco Bay. The sinuous “Venice-like” lagoon system that formed Sustainable Land the backbone of the plan amazed me with its inherent beauty and appropriateness to the natural Planning, Urban sloughs that ran along the Bay. What also amazed me was that this was a Master Planned New Design and Park and Town, the first significant effort of this post-WWII large scale planning concept in California and it had Conservation Planning. begun to be built as planned.
    [Show full text]
  • BAYLANDS & CREEKS South San Francisco
    Oak_Mus_Baylands_SideA_6_7_05.pdf 6/14/2005 11:52:36 AM M12 M10 M27 M10A 121°00'00" M28 R1 For adjoining area see Creek & Watershed Map of Fremont & Vicinity 37°30' 37°30' 1 1- Dumbarton Pt. M11 - R1 M26 N Fremont e A in rr reek L ( o te C L y alien a o C L g a Agua Fria Creek in u d gu e n e A Green Point M a o N l w - a R2 ry 1 C L r e a M8 e g k u ) M7 n SF2 a R3 e F L Lin in D e M6 e in E L Creek A22 Toroges Slou M1 gh C ine Ravenswood L Slough M5 Open Space e ra Preserve lb A Cooley Landing L i A23 Coyote Creek Lagoon n M3 e M2 C M4 e B Palo Alto Lin d Baylands Nature Mu Preserve S East Palo Alto loug A21 h Calaveras Point A19 e B Station A20 Lin C see For adjoining area oy Island ote Sand Point e A Lucy Evans Lin Baylands Nature Creek Interpretive Center Newby Island A9 San Knapp F Map of Milpitas & North San Jose Creek & Watershed ra Hooks Island n Tract c A i l s Palo Alto v A17 q i ui s to Creek Baylands Nature A6 o A14 A15 Preserve h g G u u a o Milpitas l Long Point d a S A10 A18 l u d p Creek l A3N e e i f Creek & Watershed Map of Palo Alto & Vicinity Creek & Watershed Calera y A16 Berryessa a M M n A1 A13 a i h A11 l San Jose / Santa Clara s g la a u o Don Edwards San Francisco Bay rd Water Pollution Control Plant B l h S g Creek d u National Wildlife Refuge o ew lo lo Vi F S Environmental Education Center .
    [Show full text]
  • About WETA Present Future a Plan for Expanded Bay Area Ferry Service
    About WETA Maintenance Facility will consolidate Central and South Bay fleet operations, include a fueling facility with emergency fuel The San Francisco Bay Area Water Emergency Transportation storage capacity, and provide an alternative EOC location, Authority (WETA) is a regional public transit agency tasked with thereby significantly expanding WETA’s emergency response operating and expanding ferry service on the San Francisco and recovery capabilities. Bay, and is responsible for coordinating the water transit response to regional emergencies. Future Present WETA is planning for a system that seamlessly connects cities in the greater Bay Area with San Francisco, using Today, WETA operates daily passenger ferry service to the fast, environmentally responsible vessels, with wait times cities of Alameda, Oakland, San Francisco, Vallejo, and South of 15 minutes or less during peak commute hours. WETA’s San Francisco, carr4$)"(*- /#)тѵр million passengers 2035 vision would expand service throughout the Bay Area, annually under the San Francisco Bay Ferry brand. Over the operating 12 services at 16 terminals with a fleet of 44 vessels. last five years, SF Bay Ferry ridership has grown чф percent. In the near term, WETA will launch a Richmond/San Francisco route (201ш) and new service to Treasure Island. Other By the Numbers terminal sites such as Seaplane Lagoon in Alameda, Berkeley, Mission Bay, Redwood City, the South Bay, and the Carquinez *- /#)ǔǹǒ --$ ./-).+*-/0+ Strait are on the not-too-distant horizon. ($''$*)-$ -. /*ǗǕǑ$& .-*.. 0. 4 --4 /# 4 #4ǹ 1 -44 -ǹ A Plan for Expanded Bay Area Ferry Service --4-$ -.#$+ 1 )! --$ . Vallejo #.$)- . /*!' / /2 )ǓǑǒǘ CARQUINEZ STRAIT Ǚǖʞ.$) ǓǑǒǓǹ )ǓǑǓǑǹ Hercules WETA Expansion Targets Richmond Funded Traveling by ferry has become increasingly more popular in • Richmond Berkeley the Bay Area, as the economy continues to improve and the • Treasure Island Partially Funded Pier 41 Treasure Island population grows.
    [Show full text]
  • Sediment Transport in the San Francisco Bay Coastal System: an Overview
    Marine Geology 345 (2013) 3–17 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Marine Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/margeo Sediment transport in the San Francisco Bay Coastal System: An overview Patrick L. Barnard a,⁎, David H. Schoellhamer b,c, Bruce E. Jaffe a, Lester J. McKee d a U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center, Santa Cruz, CA, USA b U.S. Geological Survey, California Water Science Center, Sacramento, CA, USA c University of California, Davis, USA d San Francisco Estuary Institute, Richmond, CA, USA article info abstract Article history: The papers in this special issue feature state-of-the-art approaches to understanding the physical processes Received 29 March 2012 related to sediment transport and geomorphology of complex coastal–estuarine systems. Here we focus on Received in revised form 9 April 2013 the San Francisco Bay Coastal System, extending from the lower San Joaquin–Sacramento Delta, through the Accepted 13 April 2013 Bay, and along the adjacent outer Pacific Coast. San Francisco Bay is an urbanized estuary that is impacted by Available online 20 April 2013 numerous anthropogenic activities common to many large estuaries, including a mining legacy, channel dredging, aggregate mining, reservoirs, freshwater diversion, watershed modifications, urban run-off, ship traffic, exotic Keywords: sediment transport species introductions, land reclamation, and wetland restoration. The Golden Gate strait is the sole inlet 9 3 estuaries connecting the Bay to the Pacific Ocean, and serves as the conduit for a tidal flow of ~8 × 10 m /day, in addition circulation to the transport of mud, sand, biogenic material, nutrients, and pollutants.
    [Show full text]
  • Goga Wrfr.Pdf
    The National Park Service Water Resources Division is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operational support to units of the National Park System. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, watershed studies, and aquatic ecology. Technical Reports The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the Natural Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: National Park Service (970) 225-3500 Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 National Park Service (303) 969-2130 Technical Information Center Denver Service Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 Cover photos: Top: Golden Gate Bridge, Don Weeks Middle: Rodeo Lagoon, Joel Wagner Bottom: Crissy Field, Joel Wagner ii CONTENTS Contents, iii List of Figures, iv Executive Summary, 1 Introduction, 7 Water Resources Planning, 9 Location and Demography, 11 Description of Natural Resources, 12 Climate, 12 Physiography, 12 Geology, 13 Soils, 13
    [Show full text]
  • Surficial Characteristics of the Bay Floor of South San Francisco, San Pablo, and Suisun Bays, California by John L Chin1 and H
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Surficial characteristics of the bay floor of South San Francisco, San Pablo, and Suisun Bays, California by John L Chin1 and H. Edward Clifton1 Open-File Report 90-665 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards (or with the North American Stratigraphic Code). Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 1 U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California 94025 1990 INTRODUCTION San Francisco Bay is the largest estuary on the Pacific Coast of the United States. Although the hydrology and biology of the bay have been extensively studied, almost no studies have been conducted on the surficial characteristics and composition of the bay floor, and how physical processes both form and modify it into different morphologies. Rubin and McCulloch (1979) conducted such a study in central San Francisco Bay. This study was designed to study the southern and northern parts of the bay in a manner analogous to that of Rubin and McCulloch (1979). Our reconnaissance investigation characterizes the surficial morphology of the bay floor as revealed by side-scan sonar imaging and high-resolution bathymetry and deduces the general nature of sedimentation, bedload sediment transport directions, and areas of deposition versus erosion. Our results should apply to current issues involving sedimentation, dredging, pollution, and the disposal of dredge spoils in the San Francisco Bay system and the highly developed urban areas that border it.
    [Show full text]
  • Portolá Trail and Development of Foster City Our Vision Table of Contents to Discover the Past and Imagine the Future
    Winter 2014-2015 LaThe Journal of the SanPeninsula Mateo County Historical Association, Volume xliii, No. 1 Portolá Trail and Development of Foster City Our Vision Table of Contents To discover the past and imagine the future. Is it Time for a Portolá Trail Designation in San Mateo County? ....................... 3 by Paul O. Reimer, P.E. Our Mission Development of Foster City: A Photo Essay .................................................... 15 To enrich, excite and by T. Jack Foster, Jr. educate through understanding, preserving The San Mateo County Historical Association Board of Directors and interpreting the history Paul Barulich, Chairman; Barbara Pierce, Vice Chairwoman; Shawn DeLuna, Secretary; of San Mateo County. Dee Tolles, Treasurer; Thomas Ames; Alpio Barbara; Keith Bautista; Sandra McLellan Behling; John Blake; Elaine Breeze; David Canepa; Tracy De Leuw; Dee Eva; Ted Everett; Accredited Pat Hawkins; Mark Jamison; Peggy Bort Jones; Doug Keyston; John LaTorra; Joan by the American Alliance Levy; Emmet W. MacCorkle; Karen S. McCown; Nick Marikian; Olivia Garcia Martinez; Gene Mullin; Bob Oyster; Patrick Ryan; Paul Shepherd; John Shroyer; Bill Stronck; of Museums. Joseph Welch III; Shawn White and Mitchell P. Postel, President. President’s Advisory Board Albert A. Acena; Arthur H. Bredenbeck; John Clinton; Robert M. Desky; T. Jack Foster, The San Mateo County Jr.; Umang Gupta; Greg Munks; Phill Raiser; Cynthia L. Schreurs and John Schrup. Historical Association Leadership Council operates the San Mateo John C. Adams, Wells Fargo; Jenny Johnson, Franklin Templeton Investments; Barry County History Museum Jolette, San Mateo Credit Union and Paul Shepherd, Cargill. and Archives at the old San Mateo County Courthouse La Peninsula located in Redwood City, Carmen J.
    [Show full text]
  • Marina Bay Trail Guide San Francisco Bay Trail Richmond, California
    Marina Bay Trail Guide San Francisco Bay Trail Richmond, California Rosie the Riveter / World War Il Home Front National Historical Park National Park Service U.S. Department of the !nterior Richmond, California i-l i I 2.'l mito i iPoint Richmond RICIJMOND MARIN.A BAY TRAIL n A century ago Marina Bay u)as a land that dissolueMnto tidal marsh at the edge(r+ \ i, \ of the great estuary we call San Froncisco Bay. One-could find shell mounds left sY by the Huchiun tribe of natiue Ohlone and watclt'""Soiting aessels ply the bay with Y ,J_r ' ,# + passengers and cargo. The arriual of Standard Off ond the Sonta Fe Railrood at q the beginning of the 20th century sparked a transformatioryffitnis hndscope that continues &, Y $ Harbor Mt today. The Marina Bay segment of the San Francisco Bay lfuit Offers us neu opportunities @EGIE to explore the history, wildlife, and scenery of Richmondffilynamic southesstern shore. Future site of Rosie the Riveterl WWll Home Front National Historical Park Visitor Center Map Legend Sheridan Point r ,.' B ft EIE .. Bay Trail suitable for walking, biking, roller skating & wheelchair access ? V Distance markers and mileage #g.9--o--,,t,* betweentwomarkers Ford Assembly MARI Stair access to San Francisco Bay Building ) Built in 1930, the Richmond Ford RICHMO Home Front tr visitor lnformation Motor Co. Plant was the largest Iucretia RICHMOND lnterpretive Markers assembly plant on the West Coast. t Edwards \ During WWII, it switched to the |,|[lil Restrooms Historical markers throughout the \ @EtrM@ Marina are easy to spot from a assembly of combat vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Bay Plan
    San Francisco Bay Plan San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission In memory of Senator J. Eugene McAteer, a leader in efforts to plan for the conservation of San Francisco Bay and the development of its shoreline. Photo Credits: Michael Bry: Inside front cover, facing Part I, facing Part II Richard Persoff: Facing Part III Rondal Partridge: Facing Part V, Inside back cover Mike Schweizer: Page 34 Port of Oakland: Page 11 Port of San Francisco: Page 68 Commission Staff: Facing Part IV, Page 59 Map Source: Tidal features, salt ponds, and other diked areas, derived from the EcoAtlas Version 1.0bc, 1996, San Francisco Estuary Institute. STATE OF CALIFORNIA GRAY DAVIS, Governor SAN FRANCISCO BAY CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION 50 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 2600 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111 PHONE: (415) 352-3600 January 2008 To the Citizens of the San Francisco Bay Region and Friends of San Francisco Bay Everywhere: The San Francisco Bay Plan was completed and adopted by the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission in 1968 and submitted to the California Legislature and Governor in January 1969. The Bay Plan was prepared by the Commission over a three-year period pursuant to the McAteer-Petris Act of 1965 which established the Commission as a temporary agency to prepare an enforceable plan to guide the future protection and use of San Francisco Bay and its shoreline. In 1969, the Legislature acted upon the Commission’s recommendations in the Bay Plan and revised the McAteer-Petris Act by designating the Commission as the agency responsible for maintaining and carrying out the provisions of the Act and the Bay Plan for the protection of the Bay and its great natural resources and the development of the Bay and shore- line to their highest potential with a minimum of Bay fill.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Broken on New Wastewater Treatment Plant Peninsula City Reaches Milestone in $1 Billion Promise to Protect San Francisco Bay
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Wednesday, September 4, 2019 Ground Broken on New Wastewater Treatment Plant Peninsula City Reaches Milestone in $1 Billion Promise to Protect San Francisco Bay San Mateo, CA — On Wednesday, Sept. 4, 2019 the City of San Mateo welcomed Representatives Jackie Speier and Anna Eshoo, along with Foster City Mayor Sam Hindi to celebrate the groundbreaking of San Mateo’s new wastewater treatment plant. The plant is the largest component of the Clean Water Program, a $1 billion initiative launched in 2015 to modernize the San Mateo sewer system, a response to a Cease and Desist Order from the State of California mandating a sewer system upgrade to eliminate sewer overflows from entering the San Francisco Bay. Sewer overflows are diluted wastewater that flow onto our streets, through stormwater drains and eventually into the San Francisco Bay. These occurrences pose significant public and environmental health concerns. “These infrastructure improvements are vital to the sustainability and future of San Mateo,” said Mayor Diane Papan, who emceed the event. “We greatly appreciate the advocacy of our council and the support of our Senators Dianne Feinstein and Kamala Harris, as well as congressional representatives Jackie Speier and Anna Eshoo, the encouragement from the EPA and our partners in Foster City, who worked on our behalf to support low-cost funding alternatives for the program.” The new plant will replace an aging plant that saw its last major upgrade in the 1970s. Construction on Phase I of the new plant begins in September 2019. “We are five successful years into the largest upgrade to our sewer facilities,” said Public Works Director Brad Underwood.
    [Show full text]
  • Latitude 38'S Guide to Bay Sailing
    MayCoverTemplate 4/21/09 9:51 AM Page 1 Latitude 38 VOLUME 383 May 2009 WE GO WHERE THE WIND BLOWS MAY 2009 VOLUME 383 BAYGUIDE SAILING TO BAY SAILINGGUIDE Is there anyone out there who's worth of learning the hard way into one and is worth a pass. Stay in the channel not feeling the pinch of the recession? grand tour of the Bay done in style and though, as the northeast side is shallow We doubt it. And yes, many are feeling comfort. We call it the The Perfect Day- and the bottom is riddled with debris. more than a pinch. We're reminded of sail, and it goes like this... Sailing back out the Sausalito Chan- the advice of Thomas Jefferson: "When Start anywhere east of Alcatraz about nel, hug the shoreline and enjoy the you get to the end of your rope, tie a 11 a.m., at which time the fog is begin- Mediterranean look of southern Sau- knot and hang on!" ning to burn off and a light breeze is fill- salito. Generally, the closer you stay to Speaking of ropes and knots and ing in. You're going to be sailing coun- this shore, the flukier the wind — until hanging on, while the 'suits' rage from terclockwise around the Bay, so from you get to Hurricane Gulch. It's not shore while the economy struggles to Alcatraz, head around the backside of marked on the charts, but you'll know extricate itself from the tarpit — we Angel Island and sail west up Raccoon when you're there.
    [Show full text]
  • Harbor Safety Committee of the SF Bay Region June 13, 2019 - Draft Page 1
    Draft Minutes Harbor Safety Committee of the San Francisco Bay Region Thursday, June 13, 2019 Port of Oakland, Exhibit Room 530 Water Street, Oakland, CA Capt. Lynn Korwatch (M), Marine Exchange of the San Francisco Bay Region (Marine Exchange), Chair of the Harbor Safety Committee (HSC); called the meeting to order at 10:01. Marcus Freeling (A), Marine Exchange, confirmed the presence of a quorum of the HSC. Committee members (M) and alternates (A) in attendance with a vote: Jim Anderson (M), CA Dungeness Crab Task Force; John Berge (M), Pacific Merchant Shipping Association; Capt. Marie Byrd (M), United States Coast Guard; Capt. Bob Carr (M), San Francisco Bar Pilots; Capt. Sean Daggett (M), Sause Bros. Inc.; Kevin Donnelly (A), WETA; Ben Eichenberg (A), San Francisco Baykeeper; Jeff Ferguson (M), NOAA; Aaron Golbus (M), Port of San Francisco; Scott Grindy (M), San Francisco Small Craft Harbor; Troy Hosmer (M), Port of Oakland; LTC Travis Rayfield (M), US Army Corps of Engineers; Jim McGrath (M), Bay Conservation and Development Commission; Benjamin Ostroff (A), Starlight Marine Services; Julian Rose (M), Marathon Petroleum; Jeff Vine (M), Port of Stockton. The meetings are always open to the public. Approval of the Minutes- A motion to accept the minutes of the May 9, 2019 meeting was made and seconded. The minutes were approved without dissent. Comments by Chair- Capt. Lynn Korwatch Welcomed the committee members and audience. Advised that the scheduled Oakland A’s stadium presentation is postponed until the August HSC meeting. The July HSC meeting is cancelled. Coast Guard Report- Capt. Marie Byrd Advised of USCG personnel changes.
    [Show full text]