DOCSLIB.ORG

Bioinformatics Evolutionary Tree Algorithms Reveal the History of the Cretan Script Family

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bioinformatics Evolutionary Tree Algorithms Reveal the History of the Cretan Script Family INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND INFORMATICS Volume 10, 2016 Bioinformatics Evolutionary Tree Algorithms Reveal the History of the Cretan Script Family Peter Z. Revesz syllabary, whose similarity with Linear A was noted by Evans. Abstract— This paper shows that Crete is the likely origin of a The Phoenician alphabet [28] was a major influence on the family of related scripts that includes the Cretan Hieroglyph, Linear development of many other alphabets due to the Phoenicians’ A, Linear B and Cypriot syllabaries and the Greek, Phoenician, Old widespread commercial influence in the Mediterranean area. Hungarian, South Arabic and Tifinagh alphabets. The paper develops The Phoenician and the South Arabic [30] alphabets are a novel similarity measure between pairs of script symbols. The similarity measure is used as an aid to develop a comparison table of assumed to derive from the Proto-Sinaitic alphabet, which the nine scripts. The paper presents a method to translate comparison originated in the Sinai Peninsula sometime between the th th tables into DNA encodings, thereby enabling the use of mid-19 and mid-16 century BC [29]. Phoenician represents bioinformatics algorithms that construct hypothetical evolutionary the northern branch, while South Arabic represents the trees. Applying the method to the nine scripts yields a script southern branch of Proto-Sinaitic. evolutionary tree with two main branches. The first branch is The classical Greek alphabet from about 800 BC had a composed of Cretan Hieroglyph, Cypriot, Linear A, Linear B, Old Hungarian and Tifinagh, while the second branch is composed of major influence for many other European alphabets. The Greek, Phoenician and South Arabic. It is also considered how classical Greek alphabet derives from the Phoenician alphabet Proto-Sinaitic and Ugaritic may belong to this script family. except for the letters Φ, Χ, Ψ and Ω [27]. Keywords—Cretan Hieroglyph, Linear A, Linear B, Evolution, The Old Hungarian alphabet is the alphabet used by Neighbor Joining, Old Hungarian, Phylogenetics, UPGMA, Tifinagh. Hungarians before the adoption of the Latin alphabet. Parallel with the Latin, it was used sporadically until the 20th century. I. INTRODUCTION The origin of Old Hungarian is still debated. Hosszú [11] RETE was the birthplace of several ancient writings that presents a detailed view of the development from Phoenician C were first categorized by Arthur Evans, the explorer of via Aramaic and Turkish and Proto-Rovas scripts. In contrast, Knossos Palace, as the Cretan Hieroglyph, the Linear A and Forrai [8] and Varga [25] claim that the Old Hungarian script the Linear B scripts [5]. Linear A, which dates back to about already existed in the Bronze Age and cite putative 2500 BC, was the main script used in the Minoan palaces of translations of engraved artifacts going back to 1000 BC. ancient Crete. The Cretan Hieroglyph script, which may Tifinagh is another ancient script that was used by Berber predate Linear A, was used for centuries simultaneously with language speakers in North Africa and on the Canary Islands. Linear A. Linear A was replaced around 1450 BC by Linear B, Tifinagh is attested in writing from at least the 3rd century BC. which was used in Mycenaean Greece and is the oldest known The origin of the Tifinagh alphabet is also unknown, although Greek writing [10]. As described in Chadwick [2], despite it is often assumed to derive from Phoenician [31]. Evan’s decades long attempt to decipher Linear B, it remained Using bioinformatics methods, we show in this paper that a mystery until 1952 when Michael Ventris gave a the above nine scripts are members in the same script family decipherment of Linear B showing that it is an archaic version that spans across language families. In computational biology, of Greek. However, the Cretan Hieroglyph and the Linear A the study of evolutionary relationships is greatly facilitated by scripts are still not deciphered. the use of phylogenetic tree construction algorithms, such as In order to understand better these three ancient Cretan Saitou and Nei’s neighbor-joining method [21] and Sokal and scripts, in this paper we study their relationship with six other Michener’s UPGMA method [23]. The books by Baum and scripts. The other scripts are the Cypriot syllabary, and the Smith [1], Hall [9] and Lerney et al. [12] review the maximum Phoenician, the South Arabic, the Greek, the Old Hungarian likelihood and several other methods. Recently, Revesz [15] and the Tifinagh alphabets. also proposed the Common Mutations Similarity Matrix or The Cypriot syllabary [26], which was used between the CMSM method for phylogenetic tree construction. The 11th and the 4th centuries BC, was deciphered by George Smith, CMSM method derives from a series of previous evolutionary who was aided by a bilingual Phoenician-Cypriot inscription. biology studies, including [14], [18]-[20], [22] and [24]. The Cypriot syllabary derives from the earlier Cypro-Minoan Some of the efficient phylogenetic tree algorithms are able to reconstruct hypothetical evolutionary trees in a few minutes Peter Z. Revesz is with the Department of Computer Science and of computational time. Moreover, they are based on statistical Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA techniques that are free of human bias, which sometimes ([email protected]). A preliminary version of this paper was presented at the AMCSE conference in Agios Nikolaos, Crete, Greece in October 2015 prevents the objective evaluation of linguistic artifacts. [16]. ISSN: 2074-1278 67 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND INFORMATICS Volume 10, 2016 Table I A script comparison with each symbol’s known sound value to the right (blue) except for Tifinagh, which is similar to South Arabic’s. Hieroglyph Linear Linear Cypriot Phoeni South Greek Old Tifin Hungarian and A B -cian Arabic -agh Phaistos A I ʔ ʔ Α A SE SE B B P B * KO G G Γ G DA TA, D D D, Δ TE T KU XE H H E Ε MO W W US Υ MU Z Z U Ζ PA PA Ħ ḍ ɬˤ ɟ Η KA E Tˤ Tˤ C Θ MA WO Y Y J Ι WE NU K K K K PU LI L L L Λ TWE MI M M M M NE U, N N NT Ν NA TE TO S S H QE JA ʕ J, L ʕ Ο PO PO P Π ZO TI ͡ ts ṣ ṣ QA KI Q Q K Ϙ RA R R *R Ρ * TI SA š š š RO LO T T D Τ A F F H X RE RI Ħ Ψ ʒ TA LU O ISSN: 2074-1278 68 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND INFORMATICS Volume 10, 2016 Human translation attempts are inherently prone to error. The rarity of curved lines makes the scripts symbols that For example, the Phaistos Disk, which contains some form of contain them stand out from the ones that contain only straight Cretan Hieroglyph writing, was translated in numerous lines. Hence we divide script symbols into two groups: contradictory ways by a large number of professional and amateur linguists. Faucounau [6] and Fisher [7] are examples Group 1. Symbols that contain some curved lines of decipherment attempts, and Duhoux [4] is a critique of Group 2. Symbols that contain only straight lines previous decipherment attempts. In spite of these problems, human evaluation of the similarity of script symbols is still For example, for the Cypriot script, Group 1 contains: common in linguistics and is a source of bias. In contrast, bioinformatics developed many sophisticated mathematical measures of the similarity of DNA and proteins [33]. In this paper we develop a mathematical measure for the similarity of All the symbols in the first group contain a significant part pairs of script symbols. Our similarity measure is particularly of an arc of a circle or oval as a deliberate feature. Only one applicable to the linear scripts studied in this paper. The other symbol seems somewhat difficult to classify, namely: source of bias is the human construction of linguistic evolutionary trees. Instead of that approach we use the UPGMA algorithm to construct script evolutionary trees. The idea of using bioinformatics tools is attractive, but the issue is Although the above symbol contains a little bit of curve to figure out how to translate the linguistic problem of scripts near the bottom, the curve here seems to connect two straight into a bioinformatics problem. In this paper we present a lines, namely the vertical line, which is the stem of the arrow, method of translating script syllabaries and alphabets into a and a small horizontal line at the bottom. Hence the curve DNA-like encoding. This DNA-like encoding of related connecting these two straight lines seems only a secondary scripts can be passed into the evolutionary tree algorithms feature that was probably introduced as a writing convenience used to reconstruct hypothetical evolutionary scripts. In this in a later stage of writing rather than an original deliberate translation, each script becomes like the DNA of a species feature of the character. In contrast, all the six Group 1 studied by bioinformatics. symbols listed above contain curves lines, which seem This paper is organized as follows. Section II presents a deliberate and original features of those symbols. Therefore, similarity measure for script symbols. Section III uses the we classified the above script symbols and all the remaining similarity measure to make a comparative table of the script symbols into the second group. symbols. Section IV describes the DNA encoding of the Our next major division of script symbols is according to scripts. Section V presents a computational reconstruction of whether they enclose some region.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Managing Order Relations in Mlbibtex∗
    Managing order relations in MlBibTEX∗ Jean-Michel Hufflen LIFC (EA CNRS 4157) University of Franche-Comté 16, route de Gray 25030 BESANÇON CEDEX France hufflen (at) lifc dot univ-fcomte dot fr http://lifc.univ-fcomte.fr/~hufflen Abstract Lexicographical order relations used within dictionaries are language-dependent. First, we describe the problems inherent in automatic generation of multilin- gual bibliographies. Second, we explain how these problems are handled within MlBibTEX. To add or update an order relation for a particular natural language, we have to program in Scheme, but we show that MlBibTEX’s environment eases this task as far as possible. Keywords Lexicographical order relations, dictionaries, bibliographies, colla- tion algorithm, Unicode, MlBibTEX, Scheme. Streszczenie Porządek leksykograficzny w słownikach jest zależny od języka. Najpierw omó- wimy problemy powstające przy automatycznym generowaniu bibliografii wielo- języcznych. Następnie wyjaśnimy, jak są one traktowane w MlBibTEX-u. Do- danie lub zaktualizowanie zasad sortowania dla konkretnego języka naturalnego umożliwia program napisany w języku Scheme. Pokażemy, jak bardzo otoczenie MlBibTEX-owe ułatwia to zadanie. Słowa kluczowe Zasady sortowania leksykograficznego, słowniki, bibliografie, algorytmy sortowania leksykograficznego, Unikod, MlBibTEX, Scheme. 0 Introduction these items w.r.t. the alphabetical order of authors’ Looking for a word in a dictionary or for a name names. But the bst language of bibliography styles in a phone book is a common task. We get used [14] only provides a SORT function [13, Table 13.7] to the lexicographic order over a long time. More suitable for the English language, the commands for precisely, we get used to our own lexicographic or- accents and other diacritical signs being ignored by der, because it belongs to our cultural background.
    [Show full text]
  • UAX #44: Unicode Character Database File:///D:/Uniweb-L2/Incoming/08249-Tr44-3D1.Html
    UAX #44: Unicode Character Database file:///D:/Uniweb-L2/Incoming/08249-tr44-3d1.html Technical Reports L2/08-249 Working Draft for Proposed Update Unicode Standard Annex #44 UNICODE CHARACTER DATABASE Version Unicode 5.2 draft 1 Authors Mark Davis ([email protected]) and Ken Whistler ([email protected]) Date 2008-7-03 This Version http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr44/tr44-3.html Previous http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr44/tr44-2.html Version Latest Version http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr44/ Revision 3 Summary This annex consolidates information documenting the Unicode Character Database. Status This is a draft document which may be updated, replaced, or superseded by other documents at any time. Publication does not imply endorsement by the Unicode Consortium. This is not a stable document; it is inappropriate to cite this document as other than a work in progress. A Unicode Standard Annex (UAX) forms an integral part of the Unicode Standard, but is published online as a separate document. The Unicode Standard may require conformance to normative content in a Unicode Standard Annex, if so specified in the Conformance chapter of that version of the Unicode Standard. The version number of a UAX document corresponds to the version of the Unicode Standard of which it forms a part. Please submit corrigenda and other comments with the online reporting form [Feedback]. Related information that is useful in understanding this annex is found in Unicode Standard Annex #41, “Common References for Unicode Standard Annexes.” For the latest version of the Unicode Standard, see [Unicode]. For a list of current Unicode Technical Reports, see [Reports].
    [Show full text]
  • Tungumál, Letur Og Einkenni Hópa
    Tungumál, letur og einkenni hópa Er letur ómissandi í baráttu hópa við ríkjandi öfl? Frá Tifinagh og rúnaristum til Pixação Þorleifur Kamban Þrastarson Lokaritgerð til BA-prófs Listaháskóli Íslands Hönnunar- og arkitektúrdeild Desember 2016 Í þessari ritgerð er reynt að rökstyðja þá fullyrðingu að letur sé mikilvægt og geti jafnvel undir vissum kringumstæðum verið eitt mikilvægasta vopnið í baráttu hópa fyrir tilveru sinni, sjálfsmynd og stað í samfélagi. Með því að líta á þrjú ólík dæmi, Tifinagh, rúnaletur og Pixação, hvert frá sínum stað, menningarheimi og tímabili er ætlunin að sýna hvernig saga leturs og týpógrafíu hefur samtvinnast og mótast af samfélagi manna og haldist í hendur við einkenni þjóða og hópa fólks sem samsama sig á einn eða annan hátt. Einkenni hópa myndast oft sem andsvar við ytri öflum sem ógna menningu, auði eða tilverurétti hópsins. Hópar nota mismunandi leturtýpur til þess að tjá sig, tengjast og miðla upplýsingum. Það skiptir ekki eingöngu máli hvað þú skrifar heldur hvernig, með hvaða aðferðum og á hvaða efni. Skilaboðin eru fólgin í letrinu sjálfu en ekki innihaldi letursins. Letur er útlit upplýsingakerfis okkar og hefur notkun ritmáls og leturs aldrei verið meiri í heiminum sem og læsi. Ritmál og letur eru algjörlega samofnir hlutir og ekki hægt að slíta annað frá öðru. Ekki er hægt að koma frá sér ritmáli nema í letri og þessi tvö hugtök flækjast því oft saman. Í ljósi athugana á þessum þremur dæmum í ritgerðinni dreg ég þá ályktun að letur spilar og hefur spilað mikilvægt hlutverk í einkennum þjóða og hópa. Letur getur, ásamt tungumálinu, stuðlað að því að viðhalda, skapa eða eyðileggja menningu og menningarlegar tenginga Tungumál, letur og einkenni hópa Er letur ómissandi í baráttu hópa við ríkjandi öfl? Frá Tifinagh og rúnaristum til Pixação Þorleifur Kamban Þrastarson Lokaritgerð til BA-prófs í Grafískri hönnun Leiðbeinandi: Óli Gneisti Sóleyjarson Grafísk hönnun Hönnunar- og arkitektúrdeild Desember 2016 Ritgerð þessi er 6 eininga lokaritgerð til BA-prófs í Grafískri hönnun.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ogham-Runes and El-Mushajjar
    c L ite atu e Vo l x a t n t r n o . o R So . u P R e i t ed m he T a s . 1 1 87 " p r f ro y f r r , , r , THE OGHAM - RUNES AND EL - MUSHAJJAR A D STU Y . BY RICH A R D B URTO N F . , e ad J an uar 22 (R y , PART I . The O ham-Run es g . e n u IN tr ating this first portio of my s bj ect, the - I of i Ogham Runes , have made free use the mater als r John collected by Dr . Cha les Graves , Prof. Rhys , and other students, ending it with my own work in the Orkney Islands . i The Ogham character, the fair wr ting of ' Babel - loth ancient Irish literature , is called the , ’ Bethluis Bethlm snion e or , from its initial lett rs, like “ ” Gree co- oe Al hab e t a an d the Ph nician p , the Arabo “ ” Ab ad fl d H ebrew j . It may brie y be describe as f b ormed y straight or curved strokes , of various lengths , disposed either perpendicularly or obliquely to an angle of the substa nce upon which the letters n . were i cised , punched, or rubbed In monuments supposed to be more modern , the letters were traced , b T - N E E - A HE OGHAM RU S AND L M USH JJ A R . n not on the edge , but upon the face of the recipie t f n l o t sur ace ; the latter was origi al y wo d , s aves and tablets ; then stone, rude or worked ; and , lastly, metal , Th .
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Numerals
    History of Numbers 1c. I can distinguish between an additive and positional system, and convert between Roman and Hindu-Arabic numbers. Roman Numerals The numeric system represented by Roman numerals originated in ancient Rome (753 BC–476 AD) and remained the usual way of writing numbers throughout Europe well into the Late Middle Ages. By the 11th century, the more efJicient Hindu–Arabic numerals had been introduced into Europe by way of Arab traders. Roman numerals, however, remained in commo use well into the 14th and 15th centuries, even in accounting and other business records (where the actual calculations would have been made using an abacus). Roman numerals are still used today, in certain contexts. See: Modern Uses of Roman Numerals Numbers in this system are represented by combinations of letters from the Latin alphabet. Roman numerals, as used today, are based on seven symbols: The numbers 1 to 10 are expressed in Roman numerals as: I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X. This an additive system. Numbers are formed by combining symbols and adding together their values. For example, III is three (three ones) and XIII is thirteen (a ten plus three ones). Because each symbol (I, V, X ...) has a Jixed value rather than representing multiples of ten, one hundred and so on (according to the numeral's position) there is no need for “place holding” zeros, as in numbers like 207 or 1066. Using Roman numerals, those numbers are written as CCVII (two hundreds, plus a ive and two ones) and MLXVI (a thousand plus a ifty plus a ten, a ive and a one).
    [Show full text]
  • ISO Basic Latin Alphabet
    ISO basic Latin alphabet The ISO basic Latin alphabet is a Latin-script alphabet and consists of two sets of 26 letters, codified in[1] various national and international standards and used widely in international communication. The two sets contain the following 26 letters each:[1][2] ISO basic Latin alphabet Uppercase Latin A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z alphabet Lowercase Latin a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z alphabet Contents History Terminology Name for Unicode block that contains all letters Names for the two subsets Names for the letters Timeline for encoding standards Timeline for widely used computer codes supporting the alphabet Representation Usage Alphabets containing the same set of letters Column numbering See also References History By the 1960s it became apparent to thecomputer and telecommunications industries in the First World that a non-proprietary method of encoding characters was needed. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) encapsulated the Latin script in their (ISO/IEC 646) 7-bit character-encoding standard. To achieve widespread acceptance, this encapsulation was based on popular usage. The standard was based on the already published American Standard Code for Information Interchange, better known as ASCII, which included in the character set the 26 × 2 letters of the English alphabet. Later standards issued by the ISO, for example ISO/IEC 8859 (8-bit character encoding) and ISO/IEC 10646 (Unicode Latin), have continued to define the 26 × 2 letters of the English alphabet as the basic Latin script with extensions to handle other letters in other languages.[1] Terminology Name for Unicode block that contains all letters The Unicode block that contains the alphabet is called "C0 Controls and Basic Latin".
    [Show full text]
  • A Translation of the Malia Altar Stone
    MATEC Web of Conferences 125, 05018 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/ matecconf/201712505018 CSCC 2017 A Translation of the Malia Altar Stone Peter Z. Revesz1,a 1 Department of Computer Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68588, USA Abstract. This paper presents a translation of the Malia Altar Stone inscription (CHIC 328), which is one of the longest known Cretan Hieroglyph inscriptions. The translation uses a synoptic transliteration to several scripts that are related to the Malia Altar Stone script. The synoptic transliteration strengthens the derived phonetic values and allows avoiding certain errors that would result from reliance on just a single transliteration. The synoptic transliteration is similar to a multiple alignment of related genomes in bioinformatics in order to derive the genetic sequence of a putative common ancestor of all the aligned genomes. 1 Introduction symbols. These attempts so far were not successful in deciphering the later two scripts. Cretan Hieroglyph is a writing system that existed in Using ideas and methods from bioinformatics, eastern Crete c. 2100 – 1700 BC [13, 14, 25]. The full Revesz [20] analyzed the evolutionary relationships decipherment of Cretan Hieroglyphs requires a consistent within the Cretan script family, which includes the translation of all known Cretan Hieroglyph texts not just following scripts: Cretan Hieroglyph, Linear A, Linear B the translation of some examples. In particular, many [6], Cypriot, Greek, Phoenician, South Arabic, Old authors have suggested translations for the Phaistos Disk, Hungarian [9, 10], which is also called rovásírás in the most famous and longest Cretan Hieroglyph Hungarian and also written sometimes as Rovas in inscription, but in general they were unable to show that English language publications, and Tifinagh.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Options for Handling Full Unicode Character Encodings in MARC21 a Study for the Library of Congress
    1 Assessment of Options for Handling Full Unicode Character Encodings in MARC21 A Study for the Library of Congress Part 1: New Scripts Jack Cain Senior Consultant Trylus Computing, Toronto 1 Purpose This assessment intends to study the issues and make recommendations on the possible expansion of the character set repertoire for bibliographic records in MARC21 format. 1.1 “Encoding Scheme” vs. “Repertoire” An encoding scheme contains codes by which characters are represented in computer memory. These codes are organized according to a certain methodology called an encoding scheme. The list of all characters so encoded is referred to as the “repertoire” of characters in the given encoding schemes. For example, ASCII is one encoding scheme, perhaps the one best known to the average non-technical person in North America. “A”, “B”, & “C” are three characters in the repertoire of this encoding scheme. These three characters are assigned encodings 41, 42 & 43 in ASCII (expressed here in hexadecimal). 1.2 MARC8 "MARC8" is the term commonly used to refer both to the encoding scheme and its repertoire as used in MARC records up to 1998. The ‘8’ refers to the fact that, unlike Unicode which is a multi-byte per character code set, the MARC8 encoding scheme is principally made up of multiple one byte tables in which each character is encoded using a single 8 bit byte. (It also includes the EACC set which actually uses fixed length 3 bytes per character.) (For details on MARC8 and its specifications see: http://www.loc.gov/marc/.) MARC8 was introduced around 1968 and was initially limited to essentially Latin script only.
    [Show full text]
  • Early-Alphabets-3.Pdf
    Early Alphabets Alphabetic characteristics 1 Cretan Pictographs 11 Hieroglyphics 16 The Phoenician Alphabet 24 The Greek Alphabet 31 The Latin Alphabet 39 Summary 53 GDT-101 / HISTORY OF GRAPHIC DESIGN / EARLY ALPHABETS 1 / 53 Alphabetic characteristics 3,000 BCE Basic building blocks of written language GDT-101 / HISTORY OF GRAPHIC DESIGN / EARLY ALPHABETS / Alphabetic Characteristics 2 / 53 Early visual language systems were disparate and decentralized 3,000 BCE Protowriting, Cuneiform, Heiroglyphs and far Eastern writing all functioned differently Rebuses, ideographs, logograms, and syllabaries · GDT-101 / HISTORY OF GRAPHIC DESIGN / EARLY ALPHABETS / Alphabetic Characteristics 3 / 53 HIEROGLYPHICS REPRESENTING THE REBUS PRINCIPAL · BEE & LEAF · SEA & SUN · BELIEF AND SEASON GDT-101 / HISTORY OF GRAPHIC DESIGN / EARLY ALPHABETS / Alphabetic Characteristics 4 / 53 PETROGLYPHIC PICTOGRAMS AND IDEOGRAPHS · CIRCA 200 BCE · UTAH, UNITED STATES GDT-101 / HISTORY OF GRAPHIC DESIGN / EARLY ALPHABETS / Alphabetic Characteristics 5 / 53 LUWIAN LOGOGRAMS · CIRCA 1400 AND 1200 BCE · TURKEY GDT-101 / HISTORY OF GRAPHIC DESIGN / EARLY ALPHABETS / Alphabetic Characteristics 6 / 53 OLD PERSIAN SYLLABARY · 600 BCE GDT-101 / HISTORY OF GRAPHIC DESIGN / EARLY ALPHABETS / Alphabetic Characteristics 7 / 53 Alphabetic structure marked an enormous societal leap 3,000 BCE Power was reserved for those who could read and write · GDT-101 / HISTORY OF GRAPHIC DESIGN / EARLY ALPHABETS / Alphabetic Characteristics 8 / 53 What is an alphabet? Definition An alphabet is a set of visual symbols or characters used to represent the elementary sounds of a spoken language. –PM · GDT-101 / HISTORY OF GRAPHIC DESIGN / EARLY ALPHABETS / Alphabetic Characteristics 9 / 53 What is an alphabet? Definition They can be connected and combined to make visual configurations signifying sounds, syllables, and words uttered by the human mouth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of the Alphabet but Their Numbers Tally Into of Greeks and Later Through Their Manuscripts
    1 ORIGINS OF THE ALPHABET gchgchgchgchgchgchgchgcggchgchgchgchgchgchggchch disadvantages to this system: not the development of the alphabet, letters developed as a natural result of only were the symbols complex, for it was through the auspices the use of the fl exible reed pen for writing The origins of the alphabet but their numbers tally into of Greeks and later through their manuscripts. Lowercase letters for the begin within the shadowy realms of the tens of thousands, making cultural admirers, the Romans, most part require fewer strokes for their prehistory. At some time within that learning diffi cult and writing slow. that the alphabet was to fi nally formation, allowing the scribes to fi t more shadowed prehistory, humankind An early culture that take on a distinct resemblance letters in a line of type. The combination began to communicate visually. inspired to innovate a simpler, to the modern Western alphabet. of speed and space conservation was Motivated by the need to communicate more effi cient writing system was important to monks writing lengthy facts about the environment around the Phoenicians. The Phoenicians manuscripts on expensive parchment, them, humans made simple drawings v were a wide-fl ung trading people When the Romans adopted and the use of lowercase letters was widely of everyday objects such as people, of great vitality, with complex the Greek alphabet, along with adopted in animals, weapons and so forth. These business transactions that other aspects of Greek culture, a relatively object drawings are called pictographs. required accurate record keeping. they continued the development short time It was through their need for and usage of the alphabet.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Cyrillic in Unicode*
    Old Cyrillic in Unicode* Ivan A Derzhanski Institute for Mathematics and Computer Science, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences [email protected] The current version of the Unicode Standard acknowledges the existence of a pre- modern version of the Cyrillic script, but its support thereof is limited to assigning code points to several obsolete letters. Meanwhile mediæval Cyrillic manuscripts and some early printed books feature a plethora of letter shapes, ligatures, diacritic and punctuation marks that want proper representation. (In addition, contemporary editions of mediæval texts employ a variety of annotation signs.) As generally with scripts that predate printing, an obvious problem is the abundance of functional, chronological, regional and decorative variant shapes, the precise details of whose distribution are often unknown. The present contents of the block will need to be interpreted with Old Cyrillic in mind, and decisions to be made as to which remaining characters should be implemented via Unicode’s mechanism of variation selection, as ligatures in the typeface, or as code points in the Private space or the standard Cyrillic block. I discuss the initial stage of this work. The Unicode Standard (Unicode 4.0.1) makes a controversial statement: The historical form of the Cyrillic alphabet is treated as a font style variation of modern Cyrillic because the historical forms are relatively close to the modern appearance, and because some of them are still in modern use in languages other than Russian (for example, U+0406 “I” CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER I is used in modern Ukrainian and Byelorussian). Some of the letters in this range were used in modern typefaces in Russian and Bulgarian.
    [Show full text]
  • Hungarian Place Name Pronunciation for English-Speakers: the Hungarian Language Is Part of the Uralic Language Family, Which Also Includes Finnish and Estonian
    Hungarian Place Name Pronunciation for English-speakers: The Hungarian language is part of the Uralic language family, which also includes Finnish and Estonian. The name Uralic derives from the hypothesized homeland of the languages in the vicinity of the Ural Mountains. More specifically, Hungarian is an Ugric language, with its closest relatives believed to be Khanty and Mansi – two obscure languages each spoken by around 10,000 people in western Siberia. The Hungarian language contains several sounds that don’t exist in English, so this pronunciation guide for map locations is approximate. Organized by Chip Saltsman, Hungarian pronunciation kindly provided by Scott Moore. A QUICK GUIDE TO PRONOUNCING HUNGARIAN There are a few things you need to know before even trying to pronounce any Hungarian words: 1) All Hungarian words are stressed on the first syllable – in the list below, the stressed syllable will be shown in bold. This can be tricky to do if you aren’t used to it. Try it with the words ‘American Express’ in English. Normally these words are both stressed on the second syllable i.e. uh-mair-uh-kuhn ek-spres (US pronunciation) or uh-me-ri-kuhn ik- spres (UK pronunciation). Try to say it like this: Uh-mair-uh-kuhn Ik-spres. Difficult isn’t it? 2) Hungarian is highly phonetic. That means that any given written letter is always pronounced the same way. English is not very phonetic, especially with names. For example, Worcestershire is pronounced: wuh-stuh-shu. 3) The Hungarian alphabet has 40 letters (or 44 in the extended version)! As there aren’t enough symbols in the Latin alphabet, they’ve had to be creative in the use of: a.
    [Show full text]