DOCSLIB.ORG

Concordia Journal (ISSN 0145-7233) Publisher Faculty Dale A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Concordia Journal (ISSN 0145-7233) Publisher Faculty Dale A Concordia Journal COncordia July 2008 Journal volume 34 | number 3 July 2008 a special issue volume Where’s the Center? 34 | number 3 What Are Ecclesiologically Challenged Lutherans to Do? The Trans-Congregational Church in the New Testament Thinking with Walther: Congregation, Synod, Church COncordia Journal (ISSN 0145-7233) publisher Faculty Dale A. Meyer David Adams Erik Herrmann Paul Robinson President Charles Arand Jeffrey Kloha Robert Rosin Executive EDITOR Andrew Bartelt Robert Kolb Henry Rowold David Berger Reed Lessing Timothy Saleska William W. Schumacher Joel Biermann David Lewis Leopoldo Sánchez M. Dean of Theological Gerhard Bode Thomas Manteufel David Schmitt Research and Publication James Brauer Richard Marrs Bruce Schuchard EDITOR Kent Burreson David Maxwell William Schumacher Travis J. Scholl William Carr, Jr. Dale Meyer William Utech Managing Editor of Anthony Cook Glenn Nielsen James Voelz Theological Publications Timothy Dost Joel Okamoto Richard Warneck EDITORial assistant Thomas Egger Jeffrey Oschwald Robert Weise Melanie Appelbaum Ronald Feuerhahn David Peter Quentin Student assistants Jeffrey Gibbs Paul Raabe Wesselschmidt Carol Geisler Bruce Hartung Victor Raj David Wollenburg Joel Haak Matthew Kobs All correspondence should be sent to: Travis Scholl CONCORDIA JOURNAL 801 Seminary Place St. Louis, Missouri 63105 Issued by the faculty of Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, Missouri, the Concordia Journal is the successor of Lehre und Wehre (1855-1929), begun by C. F. W. Walther, a founder of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod. Lehre und Wehre was absorbed by the Concordia Theological Monthly (1930-1972) which was also pub- lished by the faculty of Concordia Seminary as the official theological periodical of the Synod. The Concordia Journal is abstracted in Internationale Zeitschriftenschau für Bibelwissenschaft unde Grenzgebiete, New Testament Abstracts.Old Testament Abstracts, and Religious and Theological Abstracts. It is indexed in Repertoire Bibliographique des Institutions Chretiennes and Religion Index One: Periodicals. Article and issue photocopies in 16mm microfilm, 35mm microfilm, and 105mm microfiche are available from University Microfilms International, 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346. Books submitted for review should be sent to the editor. Manuscripts submitted for publication should conform to a standard manual of style. They will be returned to authors only when accompanied by self- addressed stamped envelopes. The Concordia Journal (ISSN 0145-7233) is published quarterly (January, April, July, and October). The annual subscription rate is $12 U.S.A., $13 for Canada and $16 for foreign countries. Periodicals postage paid at St. Louis, MO and additional mailing offices. Postmaster: Send address changes to Concordia Journal, Concordia Seminary, 801 Seminary Place, St. Louis, MO 63105-3199 Special thanks to the LCMS Blue Ribbon Task Force on Synodical Structure and Governance and Concordia Publishing House for use of the artwork featured on the cover. © Copyright by Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, Missouri 2007 www.csl.edu interior_mlp:Layout 1 7/10/2008 10:35 AM Page 1 COncordia Journal CONTENTS EDITORIALs 149 Editor’s Note 152 Where’s the Center? Dale A. Meyer ARTICLES 157 What Are Ecclesiologically Challenged Lutherans To Do?: Starting Points for a Lutheran Ecclesiology Charles P. Arand 172 The Trans-Congregational Church in the New Testament Jeffrey Kloha 191 Thinking with Walther about the Church: Congregation, Synod, Church William W. Schumacher 217 GRAMMARIAN’S CORNER Greek Participles, Part VII BOOK REVIEWS 223 Highlights in Contemporary Ecclesiology: A Review Essay John H. Rhoads 230 Additional Book Reviews July 2008 volume 34 | number 3 CJinteriorJuly08FINAL:Layout 1 7/1/2008 12:54 PM Page 2 CJinteriorJuly08FINAL:Layout 1 7/1/2008 12:54 PM Page 3 editoRIALS COncordia Journal CJinteriorJuly08FINAL:Layout 1 7/1/2008 12:54 PM Page 4 CJinteriorJuly08FINAL:Layout 1 7/1/2008 12:56 PM Page 149 Editor’s Note As we are preparing this special theme issue of the Concordia Journal, the Boston Celtics and Los Angeles Lakers are renewing their historic basketball rivalry in the 2008 NBA Finals. Much has been made of how Boston coach Doc Rivers has led his team to a marvelous turnaround season by rallying his players around the slogan of ubuntu. Ubuntu is the traditional African concept that personhood is most deeply realized in community. Hence, ubuntu is expressed in communal wel- fare, mutual high regard, unmitigated hospitality, and, yes, teamwork. It is expressed in the simple maxim: “I am what I am because of who we all are.” It seems to me that ubuntu provides a powerful philosophical analogy to ekklesia, to why God would gather his children together as one into the body we call church. It is why individuals find themselves (in more ways than one) in a con- gregation. It is why a congregation finds itself in a synod. It is why a synod finds itself in the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church. “I am what I am because of who we all are.” And yet, we find ourselves in an American context where it seems the oppo- site holds sway. As part of his massive Pulpit & Pew research study, Jackson Carroll cites one of the central challenges faced by American clergy and their churches as “de facto congregationalism.” This reality confronts all of American Christianity, a reality intensified by our ever-growing consumerist society and economy. De facto congregationalism is seemingly unique to American religious life. It is rooted in the Enlightenment notion of religious communities as “voluntary associations” of autonomous individuals, part and parcel of the intellectual milieu in which “America” as a nation and culture was founded. As Carroll states in God’s Potters: Pastoral Leadership and the Shaping of Congregations (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2006): This particular characteristic of American religious life has had its impact on almost all American religious communities. To varying degrees they all have come to adopt the voluntary principle. Almost all practice what sociologist R. Stephen Warner has called “de facto con- gregationalism,” an organizational pattern that more or less follows the model of the Reformed Protestant tradition that defines the congrega- tion as a voluntarily gathered community.... [T]his has important impli- cations for pastoral leadership in their work of producing religious cul- ture. (52-53) American Christians, including those of us who find ourselves in The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod (LCMS), have been living with these realities for generations. And this is all the more true in a denomination that understands its polity as a “modified congregational structure.” Concordia Journal/July 2008 149 CJinteriorJuly08FINAL:Layout 1 7/1/2008 12:56 PM Page 150 Yet, what does de facto congregationalism implicitly say about the church? What are the ecclesiological implications of such denominational structures? These are important questions, and this isn’t the first time they have been asked. But with the publication of Congregation–Synod–Church, the study document of the Synod’s Blue Ribbon Task Force on Synodical Structure and Governance, and in the advent of its ongoing work, we felt is was a good time to ask these questions again. Hence, this special theme issue of the Concordia Journal. Its theme is ecclesiology. Its goal is to deepen and extend the conversation about what it means to be church today, and what kind of church we—in one little corner of it—intend to be, already eight years into a new century. For us in The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod this conversation has direct and significant implications. But for the broader church, the implications are just as meaningful. This conversation impacts many American Christians, indeed many global Christians. We enter into the conversation with the prayer that it may benefit the whole church throughout all the world. And if we are to speak to each other with integrity and charity, we must listen to each other openly and faithfully. To that end, Concordia Journal submits the following voices to the conversa- tion. Concordia Seminary President Dale Meyer opens the discussion with the provocative question, “Where’s the Center?” in the church today. Charles Arand follows up with “starting points” in ecclesiology, especially as it pertains to the Lutheran tradition, where ecclesiology is never cut and dried. Jeffrey Kloha then digs into the New Testament foundations for “church,” particularly church as con- ceived as what he calls a “trans-congregational” community. William Schumacher follows with a historical analysis of what one of the “founding fathers” of the LCMS, C. F. W. Walther, meant in his understanding of “synod,” how that culture has changed in the intervening years, and what the historical implications are for us in a radically different cultural context. Finally, John Rhoads provides a compelling review essay of “must-reads” in contemporary ecclesiology. All this is in addition to some of the usual things you see in Concordia Journal. But we should add a quick word about something you do not see, namely the Homiletical Helps. In light of what appeared as a kind of kairos moment in the life of the church, we felt the church benefitted from as much space as possible to talk about it. For that reason, we made the difficult decision to cut the Homiletical Helps for just this one issue. Of course, the perception of kairos is often in the mind of the beholder. So, we invite you to visit www.ConcordiaTheology.org, for homiletical helps, and the ever-popular “Lectionary at Lunch” (under “Congregational Resources”) on the Seminary’s iTunesU portal (itunes.csl.edu). Both places provide a wealth of homiletical resources. And rest assured that this is a temporary hiatus; Homiletical Helps will be back with the next issue. 150 CJinteriorJuly08FINAL:Layout 1 7/1/2008 12:56 PM Page 151 As for the church, the Christ who is its head has promised that as long as two or three or more are gathered, he is there.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Church History
    Village Missions Website: http://www.vmcdi.com Contenders Discipleship Initiative E-mail: [email protected] Church History Ecclesiology Church History History of Christian Doctrine Church History - Ecclesiology and the History of Christian Doctrine Contenders Discipleship Initiative – Church History Instructor’s Guide TRAINING MODULE SUMMARY Course Name Church History Course Number in Series 5 Creation Date August 2017 Created By: Russell Richardson Last Date Modified January 2018 Version Number 2 Copyright Note Contenders Bible School is a two-year ministry equipping program started in 1995 by Pastor Ron Sallee at Machias Community Church, Snohomish, WA. More information regarding the full Contenders program and copies of this guide and corresponding videos can be found at http://www.vmcontenders.org or http://www.vmcdi.com Copyright is retained by Village Missions with all rights reserved to protect the integrity of this material and the Village Missions Contenders Discipleship Initiative. Contenders Discipleship Initiative Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in the Contenders Discipleship Initiative courses are those of the instructors and authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Village Missions. The viewpoints of Village Missions may be found at https://villagemissions.org/doctrinal-statement/ The Contenders program is provided free of charge and it is expected that those who receive freely will in turn give freely. Permission for non-commercial use is hereby granted but re-sale is prohibited. Copyright
    [Show full text]
  • To Volume II
    Index to Volume II 2 announcement, 171, 296, 297, 302 Antichrist, 164, 556, 598, 600, 603, 604, 609, 610, 2 Clement 611, 612, 613, 614, 615, 616, 617, 618, 619, 598– merits and justification, 370 620 2 Maccabees any opponent of Christ an antichrist, 598–600 prayer for dead, 442 Lutherans teach this doctrine others support this as well, 610 A one great Antichrist spoken of, 600 ability, 39, 43, 49, 105, 110, 213, 254, 306, 323, 343, distinuished from other anitchrists, 600 369, 403, 404, 410, 430, 549, 583 names for Abraham’s bosom (heaven), 722 Little Horn, King of the North, the Beast, absolute decree, 311, 477, 715 the Great Prostitute, 601 accident, 72, 633 Man of Sin or Lawlessness, 600 actio, 270 Pope in Rome is the Antichrist additions to Scripture. See Word of God:sufficiency of agent of Satan, 616 adiaphora, 416–18, 542 archtypal representative of unbelief and Christian's attitude governed by opinio legis, 606 must defend liberties when attacked in claims infallibility, 606, 607 principle, 417 claims to be vicar (subsitute) of Christ, 606 own conscience, 416 curses justification by grace alone, 606 respect for liberty of others and welfare of weak damns those not subject to him, 608 brother, 416 doctrine highly deceptive, 616 Christian's attitude governed by, 416 fits historical outline given in Scripture, offense, 418 609–10 adoption, 19, 111, 204, 213, 214, 226, 325, 358, 394, lies are his chief strength, 609 463, 620, 731 Lutherans teach this doctrine, 613–16 adoration of the host, 278 others support this as well, 616 advent, second, 669, 649–73 objections to, 611–13 Aeschylus, 685 opposes Christ in church and state, 604 agreement of Word of God.
    [Show full text]
  • Lutheran Synod Quarterly (ISSN: 0360-9685) Is Edited by the Faculty of Bethany Lutheran Theological Seminary 6 Browns Court Mankato, Minnesota 56001
    LUTHERAN SYNOD QUARTERLY Volume 50 • Number 1 march 2010 The theological journal of the Evangelical Lutheran Synod LUTHERAN SYNOD QUARTERLY EDITOR -IN-CHI E F .............................................................. Gaylin R. Schmeling BOOK RE VI E W EDITOR .............................................................Michael K. Smith PRINT E R ............................................................ Books of the Way of the Lord FA C ULTY .................Adolph L. Harstad, Thomas A. Kuster, Dennis W. Marzolf, Gaylin R. Schmeling, Michael K. Smith, Erling T. Teigen The Lutheran Synod Quarterly (ISSN: 0360-9685) is edited by the faculty of Bethany Lutheran Theological Seminary 6 Browns Court Mankato, Minnesota 56001 The Lutheran Synod Quarterly is a continuation of the Clergy Bulletin (1941–1960). The purpose of the Lutheran Synod Quarterly, as was the purpose of the Clergy Bulletin, is to provide a testimony of the theological position of the Evangelical Lutheran Synod and also to promote the academic growth of her clergy roster by providing scholarly articles, rooted in the inerrancy of the Holy Scriptures and the Confessions of the Evangelical Lutheran Church. The Lutheran Synod Quarterly is published in March and December with a combined June and September issue. Subscription rates are $20.00 U.S. per year for domestic subscriptions and $30.00 U.S. per year for international subscriptions. All subscriptions and editorial correspondence should be sent to the following address: Bethany Lutheran Theological Seminary Attn: Lutheran Synod Quarterly 6 Browns Ct Mankato MN 56001 Back issues of the Lutheran Synod Quarterly from the past two years are available at a cost of $8.00 per issue. Back issues of the Lutheran Synod Quarterly and Clergy Bulletin prior to the past two years are available at <www.blts.edu/lsq>.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Chicago “The Spiritual Human Is
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO “THE SPIRITUAL HUMAN IS DISCERNED BY NO ONE”: AN INTELLECTUAL BIOGRAPHY OF WATCHMAN NEE A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVINITY SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY PAUL H B CHANG CHICAGO, ILLINOIS JUNE 2017 For Laura 我妹子, 我親婦, 你奪了我的心 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Chapter 1, Republican China 18 Chapter 2, Fuzhou: Church and Conflict 74 Chapter 3, The Spiritual Human 127 Chapter 4, The Nanjing Decade 169 Conclusion 223 Bibliography 250 Appendix 259 iii Introduction A network of congregations quietly rings the globe, comprised of Christians meeting in homes and unassuming buildings, which usually bear little resemblance to traditional “churches.” A few outward characteristics are obvious. The local gatherings are of varying sizes, from two or three to two or three thousand. Frequently the members share meals together, often before or after services which can be boisterous and participatory. Generally, no pastor, priest, or designated religious officiant presides. As the Spirit leads, different members stand to call hymns, declare verses from the Bible, give personal testimonies, or shout praises to God. But, for all their openness about their beliefs and their tireless attempts at outreach, it can be hard for outsiders to understand who these Christians are. Why do they not join existing Christian denominations? What is the basis for their identity and the institutions they create? When asked, congregants readily and happily acknowledge their fellowship and unity with other likeminded groups from around the world, but they may seem canny and evasive when asked for the name of their local church or the name of the church network as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Justification, Presented to the Seventy-Third General Assembly
    Report on Justification Presented to the Seventy-third General Assembly of the Orthodox Presbyterian Church Committee on Christian Education Orthodox Presbyterian Church Box P Willow Grove, PA 19090-0920 Prefatory Statement In response to an overture from the Presbytery of the Midwest, the Seventy-first General Assembly of the Orthodox Presbyterian Church adopted the following Declaration on Justification: The Seventy-first (2004) General Assembly of the Orthodox Presbyterian Church (i) declares its continued commitment to the teaching of the Word of God, the Westminster Confession of Faith, and the Larger and Shorter Catechisms with regard to the doctrine of justification by faith alone; (ii) reaffirms that faith, which is a gift of God, is the sole instrument of justification; and (iii) reaffirms the following beliefs: a. “Justification is an act of God’s free grace, wherein he pardoneth all our sins, and accepteth us as righteous in his sight, only for the righteousness of Christ imputed to us, and received by faith alone” (WSC 33). b. “Those whom God effectually calls, he also freely justifieth; not by infusing righteousness into them, but by pardoning their sins, and by accounting and accepting their persons as righteous; not for any thing wrought in them, or done by them, but for Christ’s sake alone; nor by imputing faith itself, the act of believing, or any other evangelical obedience to them, as their righteousness; but by imputing the obedience and satisfaction of Christ unto them, they receiving and resting on him and his righteousness by faith; which faith they have not of themselves, it is the gift of God” (WCF 11.1).
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Responses to Faith and Order Paper No. 198 A. CHURCH
    Summary of responses to Faith and Order Paper No. 198 A. CHURCH RESPONSES Anglican 1. The Anglican Church in Aotearoa, New Zealand and Polynesia The Nature and Mission of the Church: A stage on the way to a common statement, Faith and Order Paper 198, World Council of Churches, Geneva, Switzerland, Response Document from The Anglican Church in Aotearoa, New Zealand and Polynesia, March 2007, p. 10. The present text is a church response that affirms the overall methodology of TNMC as an ecclesial exercise in ecclesiological reflection. Distinguishing convergent from different perspectives, it encourages theological honesty, although supports that convergences should be articulated rather too confidently, whereas the identification of the differences might be too understated. It is noted that the text uses a genuinely constructive biblical hermeneutic. Moreover, the response indicates that the goal of visible unity still seems to hover just over the horizon of TNMC , as it assumes the primacy of denominational identity over theological identity, failing to offer a methodological model of how dialogue can be opened and maintained between adherents of divergent theological positions, when at the same time, theological differences exist within denominations as well. Some of the most significant contemporary divisive issues cut across traditional denominational distinctions to superimpose new forms of theological identity upon the extant ecclesial identities. It is hoped that the work of the WCC in respect to the focus of TNMC can achieve a significant measure of both understanding and resolution of such issues. The analysis of the Anglican Church in Aotearoa, New Zealand and Polynesia concentrates on responding to questions posed on p12 of TNMC .
    [Show full text]
  • Mission As Nota Ecclesiae?: Testing the Scope of Augsburg Confession 7 and 8
    Is mission a sign of the church? The Rev. Dr. Klaus Detlev Schulz’s presentation from the Mission as Nota Ecclesiae?: Concordia University Irvine Joint Professors’ Conference Testing the Scope of explains. Augsburg Confession 7 and 8 by Klaus Detlev Schulz n our discussion of AC VII and AC VIII, a few the mission discussions orbited around these articles fundamental questions have to be answered if we gradually illuminated their missiological potential.2 bring systematics and missiology together, as I’m told I. Stage 1: Mission marginalized Ito do. How do the two articles in the Augsburg Confession relate to missions? How does ecclesiology inform mission The ecclesiology of the Augsburg Confession as and how does mission inform ecclesiology? Is, as my title defined in AC VII did not go unnoticed by mission schol- indicates, mission a sign of the church? Here we touch on ars. For example, in an essay, Theological Education in a sensitive topic. In terms of becoming Missionary Perspective, David Bosch involved in mission both theologically Mission is not takes a stab at the Protestant defini- tions of the church, of which AC VII and in practice, Lutheranism is a the possession of Johnny-come-lately. It took time to was the first: develop a missiology that would clarify a few committed Another factor responsible for the issues related to foreign missions. Of Christians more present embarrassment in the field course, as rightly pointed out, Luther’s pious than others of mission is that the modern mis- theology and Lutheran theology is a seed . but rather it sionary enterprise was born and 1 bed for missions, yet the seed still had belongs to the bred outside the church.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundations of Faith
    Volume 21 Issue 11 November 2015 Foundations of Faith Newsletter of Faith Lutheran Church, 171 Eastmont Avenue, East Wenatchee, WA 98802 http://www.faithlutheranwen.com; phone (509) 884-7623; fax (509) 888-6463 from the Pastor Bishop and Christian* Are Lutherans Catholic? Depending on what you bound either to join them or admit that we are a mean by “catholic” the answer might vary. sect (which means that we have left the true Many—maybe most—people in the United Church of Christ and have formed our own little States and around the world hear “catholic” and enclave—a dangerous position if Christ has automatically think of the Roman Catholic promised to be with His Church.) Church. And that means that the Roman Church We really have only those two options: has done an excellent job of defining themselves accept the Roman claim, and join that church; or theologically. The word itself comes from two make the claim that we are the true catholic Greek words meaning “according to the whole.” Church. The second is the claim that our We might say “universal.” When the Roman Lutheran fathers made in the Augsburg Church calls itself the “Catholic” church, it is Confession and in the other documents in the confessing that it is the universal Church, visible Book of Concord. They essentially made the case in the structure under the pope. They are that it was Rome who had departed from the making a claim which we must answer, primarily catholic Faith, and that the “Evangelicals” because the majority of Christians around the (Lutherans) had kept it.
    [Show full text]
  • Enough, Already – but Perhaps Not Yet
    Enough, Already – but Perhaps Not Yet: Liturgy, Church Unity, and Eschatology Address at the Institute of Liturgical Studies, 11 April 2002 David G Truemper Initial Orienting Reflections Enough, as we have been saying, ought to be enough. We’ve heard the crucial sentence from Article VII of the Augsburg Confession over and over these days, about what’s enough for the true unity of the church, namely the one and only gospel proclaimed and enacted in the assembly of believers. We have to suppose that the confessors that summer day in 1530 meant precisely what they said about preserving and maintaining the genuine unity of the church. Enough, to have some prima facie acknowledgment that it is indeed the Christian gospel been said and done in this and that assembly of the faithful. Not that gospel plus some theological proposition or some canonical requirement, we’d want to say. For we’ve learned the lesson well: gospel plus anything is always less than gospel. On the other hand, there have been all kinds of voices raised in the intervening 470 years, suggesting that such simple and obvious meanings are not properly drawn. One of my retired colleagues does not hesitate to quote one of the post-WW II German Lutheran bishops as saying, “Satis est non satis est” – by which he apparently meant to say that the “it is enough” statement is in fact and after all NOT enough, not even for the “true unity” of the church. Now, if we are to suppose that the good bishop, and my esteemed colleague with him, are not simply denying their subscription to the Augsburg Confession, we’d have to divine some sort of circumstance in which what is confessed to be enough is both truly enough and at the same time not enough.
    [Show full text]
  • David C. Searle
    The Membership of the Church of God David c. SearJe . MinisterofLarbert Old Ecdesla. The Church. The Church orGod. We see her, do we not, in her 2000 years of history, rising to great heights in her testimony to her Lord' and Saviour, sometimes remarkably blessed by the outpouring of God's Spirit - yet sometimes tossed and beaten by the waves of dissent, division. beresy, unfaithfulness. Nevertheless. always preserved by her Lord, even in the darkest generations. The subject I hope to treat today is the Membership of the Church of God. Perhaps that is too general a title. But I trust that my thesis wilJ become more plain as we proceed. Stated briefly, I am arguing for a fairly broad basis of membership.of Christ's Oturch; not too broad, but then, on the other hand, not too narrow either. Simply, in accordance with Scripture. There .~ disturbing' . evidence that much church polity today. espec:ialJy in evangelical circles, is adopting a Pietist position in respect to Church Membership. Now some of you, I know, will have been taught. and will stiJI hold. and wilJ continue to hold. long after you have heard this paper, that the Pietist position ~n Church membership is the co~ct one. It seems to me that the Reformers in arguing for a broad basis of membership were truer to Scripture than the Pietists who argued for a narrower basis of membership. Perhaps "broad" and '"narrow".are inadequate terms. "Exclusive" and "inclusive" might serve us better. My paper. then. is to try and demonstrate that church membership ought to be "inclusive" rather than "exclusive".
    [Show full text]
  • Lutheranism in America
    Logia a journal of lutheran theology Carl Ferdinand Wilhelm Walther 1811–1887 Henry Melchior Mu¨hlenberg 1711–1787 L A Eastertide 1996 volume v, number 2 logia a journal of lutheran theology Eastertide 1996 volume v, number 2 .......................................................................................................................................................................... The Church-State Relationship and Augustana XVI in the Writings of C. F. W. Walther and S. S. Schmucker By James D. Heiser .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Liturgical Uniformity in Missouri By Michael Henrichs.............................................................................................................................................................................................. Grabau and Walther: Theocentric versus Anthropocentric Understanding of Church and Ministry By Lowell C. Green................................................................................................................................................................................................ The ELCA: Its Past, Present, and Future By David A. Gustafson .......................................................................................................................................................................................... J. A. O. Preus By Leigh Jordahl ...................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The New Hampshire Confession of Faith (1853)
    1 The New Hampshire Confession of Faith (1853) I. The Scriptures We believe that the Holy Bible was written by men divinely inspired, and is a perfect treasure of heavenly instruction. It has God for its author, salvation through Christ for its purpose, and truth without any mixture of error for its content. It reveals the principles by which God will judge us. Therefore, it is and shall remain to the end of the world the true center of Christian union and the supreme standard by which all human conduct, creeds, and opinions should be tried. II. The Triune God We believe that there is one, and only one, living and true God. He is an infinite, intelligent Spirit, whose name is the LORD, the Maker and Supreme Ruler of heaven and earth. He is inexpressibly glorious in holiness, and worthy of all possible honor, confidence, and love. In the unity of the Godhead there are three persons, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. They are equal in every divine perfection, yet carry out distinct but harmonious offices in the great work of redemption. III. Humanity We believe that humanity is the special creation of God, made in his own image. God created them male and female as the crowning work of his creation. The gift of gender is thus part of God’s creation. The gift of marriage consists of the uniting of one man and one woman in covenant commitment for a lifetime, and models the way God relates to his people. IV. The Fall Humanity was created in holiness, under the law of his Maker.
    [Show full text]