DOCSLIB.ORG

Land Adjacent and Within Finches Farm, Stansted

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Land Adjacent and Within Finches Farm, Stansted LAND ADJACENT AND WITHIN FINCHES FARM, STANSTED PRELIMINARY ECOLOGICAL APPRAISAL REPORT Date of report 2nd October 2020 Date of survey 26th August 2020 Author Jenny Passmore Reviewer Becky Clover Client Name Jo Middelboe Corylus reference 20104 CORYLUS ECOLOGY Unit A3 Speldhurst Business Park, Langton Road, Speldhurst, Tunbridge Wells, Kent. TN3 0NR Telephone: 01892 861868 Email: [email protected] Director: H G Wrigley (née Lucking) BSc. MIEEM, CIEEM Corylus Ecology Ltd Registered in England No 5005553 Registered Office: Henwood House, Henwood, Ashford Kent TN24 8DH VAT Reg No. 862 2486 14 CORYLUS ECOLOGY __________________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS Page Number 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Methodology 2 3.0 Results 4 4.0 Evaluation 9 5.0 Conclusions 15 References Figures Figure 1 – Phase 1 Habitat Plan Figure 2 - Annotated Photographs Appendices Appendix 1 – Bat Legislation Appendix 2 – Sensitive Lighting Guidance 20104 LAND ADJACENT AND WITHIN FINCHES FARM PEA REPORT, OCTOBER 2020 CORYLUS ECOLOGY __________________________________________________________________________________________ 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Corylus Ecology was asked to undertake an ecology survey of land adjacent and within Finches Farm in Stansted, Kent. The Site is located on Labour-in-Vain Road, to the north-west of Wrotham village in Kent (TQ 60031 60516) and the proposals are to demolish the existing outbuildings to make way for a residential dwelling. 1.2 The Site includes five outbuilding structures which are centred around an area of ruderal vegetation and there is an overgrown hedgerow along the northern boundary. 1.3 The PEA was undertaken by Corylus Ecology on 26th August 2020. The survey includes a Phase I Habitat Survey, which provides information relating to the habitats within the Site, and a Protected Species Assessment, which identifies potential for protected species and informs the need for further protected species surveys. The Protected Species Assessment includes a Bat Building Survey, which aims to identify any evidence of and potential for roosting bats during daylight hours. 1.4 The objectives of the survey were as follows: Classify and map the habitats within the Site according to those within the Phase I manual; Determine the potential for protected species to occur within the Site, including an assessment of the buildings for potential to support bats; Identify key ecological constraints to allow early avoidance or minimisation of ecological effects through appropriate design; Suggest appropriate further protected surveys where necessary; and Suggest measures to maintain and enhance biodiversity. 20104 LAND ADJACENT AND WITHIN FINCHES FARM 1 PEA REPORT, OCTOBER 2020 CORYLUS ECOLOGY __________________________________________________________________________________________ 2.0 METHODOLOGY 2.1 Preliminary Desk Study 2.1.1 A preliminary search within 3km of the Site was undertaken for designated areas, priority habitats, and European Protected Species Mitigation (EPSM) licences using the Multi-Agency Geographic Information for the Countryside (MAGIC) interactive mapping service (Defra, 2020). Records from the local biological records centre were not sought due to the relatively small scale of the Site and proposals. 2.2 Bat and Barn Owl Building Survey 2.2.1 All buildings were subject to an external and internal survey on 26th August 2020. The survey was undertaken by Jenny Passmore (licence number 2016-23195-CLS-CLS) and Becky Clover (licence number 2017-28806-CLS-CLS) of Corylus Ecology. 2.2.2 The external survey of the buildings included an assessment of areas for potential for bats and a search for evidence such as droppings and staining immediately below potential roost areas, at the base of the buildings and on window sills. The interior of the buildings was surveyed for evidence of bats including droppings, staining and bats themselves. Bat droppings were searched for on the top of beams (where they are less likely to have been disturbed/damaged) as well as on the ground below. A high powered Clulite torch was used in the search. An endoscope with halogen light, which can fit into cavities only 9.5mm wide, was used to look for signs of bats in any accessible cavities. Buildings are placed into one of the four categories of bat roost potential: High, Moderate, Low and Negligible, as described in Table 1 below (Collins, 2016). 2.2.3 The building survey included an assessment of breeding bird potential, including potential for barn owl nesting locations such as ledges, and a search for evidence including pellets, feathers and staining. 2.3 Phase I Survey 2.3.1 The Site was subject to a Phase I Habitat Survey on 26th August 2020. The habitats present on the Site were mapped in accordance with the ‘Handbook for Phase I Habitat Survey’ (JNCC, 2003). Habitat areas and features of topographical and/or ecological interest were described in the form of target notes (TN). These were later used to create botanical species lists by target note area and also to create a colour coded Phase I Habitat map, which is presented as Figure 1. All nomenclature follows Stace (2019). 2.3.2 The Phase I Habitat Survey also includes the mapping of invasive botanical species listed under Schedule 9 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, as well as those classed as rare or declining. 20104 LAND ADJACENT AND WITHIN FINCHES FARM 2 PEA REPORT, OCTOBER 2020 CORYLUS ECOLOGY __________________________________________________________________________________________ However, some species are seasonally constrained, and therefore may not be visible on a single visit. Likewise, the presence of densely vegetated habitats may restrict access and invasive species therefore may not be recorded. 2.4 Protected Species Assessment 2.4.1 The survey included an assessment of the potential for the Site to support protected species. This type of survey aims to assess the potential for protected species to occur due to the habitats present and does not include any species-specific survey methods designed to demonstrate whether the Site is in fact used by such species. The exception is badgers Meles meles as field signs associated with this species can be searched for, including latrines, holes, pushes, paths and hairs. Bat Tree and Habitat Assessment 2.4.2 As part of the protected species assessment, a ground level investigation of all suitable trees was carried out to identify bat potential. Bats may use any crack or hole (such as woodpecker holes), splits or flaking bark and ivy (JNCC, 2004). 2.4.3 In addition, the on-site habitats were assessed for their suitability to support foraging and commuting bats. Trees, buildings and habitats were placed into one of four categories; High, Moderate, Low or Negligible (Collins, 2016): Table 1: Bat Habitat Assessment Criteria Negligible Habitat/structure with negligible features likely to be used by roosting, foraging or commuting bats. Low A habitat/structure that could be used by small numbers of roosting or commuting bats, such as a gappy hedgerow or unvegetated stream, but isolated - i.e. not very well connected to the surrounding landscape by other habitat. Moderate Continuous habitat connected to the wider landscape that could be used by bats for commuting and foraging, such as lines of trees and scrub or linked back gardens. A structure with one or more potential roost sites that could be used by bats, but are unlikely to support a roost of high conservations status. High Continuous, high quality habitat that is well connected to the wider landscape that is likely to be used regularly by commuting bats, such as river valleys, hedgerows, lines of trees and woodland edge. A structure with one or more potential roost sites that are suitable for a large number of bats on a regular basis and for a longer period of time. 20104 LAND ADJACENT AND WITHIN FINCHES FARM 3 PEA REPORT, OCTOBER 2020 CORYLUS ECOLOGY __________________________________________________________________________________________ 3.0 RESULTS 3.1 Preliminary Desk Study Sites of Special Scientific Interest 3.1.1 Halling to Trottiscliffe Escarpment SSSI is a 648ha area of the North Downs, 1.8km to the east of the Site. The SSSI is representative of a mosaic of chalk habitats with outstanding assemblages of plants and invertebrates. The downland is no longer grazed and only small areas remain on the south-facing slope. The grassland is dominated by upright brome Bromus erectus, sheep’s fescue Festuca ovina, dwarf thistle Cirsium acaule, chalk milkwort Polygala calcarea, clustered bellflower Campanula glomerata, horseshoe vetch Hippocrepis comosa, and several species of orchid including the scarce musk orchid Herminium monorchis and man orchid Aceras anthropophorum. The area is of great entomological importance. It is the only known location in Britain for the moth Hypercallia citrinalis and several other very scarce moths, beetles and grasshoppers also occur. The Site is within the Impact Risk Zone of this SSSI, however this only applies to industrial operations and small residential developments are exempt. European Protected Species Licence Records 3.1.2 Regarding records of protected species, there is a great crested newt (GCN) Triturus cristatus record from a location 2.7km to the south of the Site for a class licence return, in May 2017. A GCN licence was also granted in 2009 for a nearby location, 2.7km to the south beyond the M20 and M26 motorway. A bat EPS licence was granted August 2011 to August 2012 for a non-breeding roost of common pipistrelle Pipistrellus pipistrellus, for a location 2.7km to the north-west. A licence covering a non-breeding roost of common pipistrelle, brown long-eared Plecotus auritus and Natterer’s bat Myotis nattereri was granted March 2012 to December 2014 for a location 2.2km to the south-west. Regarding dormice Muscardinus avellarius, there is an EPS licence granted for the period September 2009 to March 2010 for a location 2.7km to the south. Habitats 3.1.3 There are fragments of ancient woodland in the immediate vicinity, the nearest being an area of 0.29ha which is situated 165m to the west.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An
    Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE IRISH BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA) WITH A CONCISE CHECKLIST OF IRISH SPECIES AND ELACHISTA BIATOMELLA (STAINTON, 1848) NEW TO IRELAND K. G. M. Bond1 and J. P. O’Connor2 1Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, School of BEES, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. e-mail: <[email protected]> 2Emeritus Entomologist, National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Abstract Additions, deletions and corrections are made to the Irish checklist of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera). Elachista biatomella (Stainton, 1848) is added to the Irish list. The total number of confirmed Irish species of Lepidoptera now stands at 1480. Key words: Lepidoptera, additions, deletions, corrections, Irish list, Elachista biatomella Introduction Bond, Nash and O’Connor (2006) provided a checklist of the Irish Lepidoptera. Since its publication, many new discoveries have been made and are reported here. In addition, several deletions have been made. A concise and updated checklist is provided. The following abbreviations are used in the text: BM(NH) – The Natural History Museum, London; NMINH – National Museum of Ireland, Natural History, Dublin. The total number of confirmed Irish species now stands at 1480, an addition of 68 since Bond et al. (2006). Taxonomic arrangement As a result of recent systematic research, it has been necessary to replace the arrangement familiar to British and Irish Lepidopterists by the Fauna Europaea [FE] system used by Karsholt 60 Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) and Razowski, which is widely used in continental Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Baseline Data
    Our Dry Weather Plan South East Water’s 2021 draft drought plan Appendix I: Environmental Baseline Data March 2021 South East Water Rocfort Road Snodland Kent ME6 5AH Drought Plan | March 2021 Contents This appendix contains the environmental baseline reports for the two river drought permit sites – the Rivers Ouse and Cuckmere, and also the Halling groundwater site. The detailed site surveys, location searches and search maps for these sites, and that form the baseline for the rest of the groundwater permit sites are contained within a separate folder of supporting documentation which is available on request from South East Water. 1. River Cuckmere Environmental Baseline 2020 2. Enhanced aquatic environmental baseline for the Grey Pit/Halling source 3. River Ouse Environmental Baseline 2020 2 River Cuckmere Drought Plan: Environmental Baseline Draft J00640/ Version 1.0 Client: South East Water January 2021 Copyright © 2021 Johns Associates Limited DOCUMENT CONTROL Report prepared for: South East Water Main contributors: Matt Johns BSc MSc CEnv MCIEEM FGS MIFM, Director Liz Johns BSc MSc CEnv MCIEEM MRSB, Director Jacob Scoble BSc GradCIWEM, Geospatial Analyst Reviewed by: Liz Johns BSc MSc CEnv MCIEEM MRSB, Director Issued by: Matt Johns BSc MSc CEnv MCIEEM FGS MIFM, Director Suites 1 & 2, The Old Brewery, Newtown, Bradford on Avon, Wiltshire, BA15 1NF T: 01225 723652 | E: [email protected] | W: www.johnsassociates.co.uk Copyright © 2021 Johns Associates Limited DOCUMENT REVISIONS Version Details Date 1.0 Draft baseline issued for client comment 25 January 2021 Third party disclaimer Any disclosure of this report to a third party is subject to this disclaimer.
    [Show full text]
  • Bollettino Dell’Associazione Romana Di Entomologia, 65 (1-4) (2010): 1-2
    ISSN 0004 - 6000 DELL’ASSOCIAZIONE ROMANA BOLLET TINO DI ENTOMOLOGIA VOL. LXV (2010) N. 1-4 A.R.D.E. Fondata da Omero Castellani nel 1945 endemismi italiani 53 EDITORIALE Lycia florentina (Stefanelli, 1882) In questo volume sono pubblicati i lavori risultanti dalle ricer- (Lepidoptera, Geometridae) che entomologiche svolte da alcuni entomologi (di ben due ge- nerazioni!) della nostra Associazione in due aree protette del Lycia florentina (Stefanelli, 1882), originaria- mente descritta nel genere Biston Leach, 1815, Lazio. come varietà di B. graecarius (Staudinger, 1861) In particolare, la prima monografia tratta della lepidotterofauna e per lungo tempo conosciuta sotto il nome ge- nerico di Nyssia Duponchel, 1829, è una specie di un’area dei Monti Reatini, poco nota ma indagata con atten- forse più nota ai coleotterologi che non ai lepi- zione e passione per oltre quarant’anni. L’area studiata, di circa dotterologi. Infatti, i maschi, normalmente alati, 2.800 ettari, è posta nei dintorni del Sito di Interesse Comunitario sono a volo notturno e possono essere osservati solamente in seguito alle raccolte alla lampada. “Monte Cagno e Colle Pratoguerra” (SIC IT6020028 della rete Le femmine, al contrario, sono microttere e sta- Na tu ra 2000) in provincia di Rieti; lì sono state registrate e iden- zionano volentieri in pieno giorno tra la vegeta- zione erbacea, sul terreno, sulle rocce, alla base tificate oltre 1.500 specie di farfalle, di cui oltre 100 inedite per dei tronchi o anche su supporti artificiali: queste l’Italia centrale o peninsulare e 13 nuove per la fauna italiana. sono perciò facilmente individuate dagli entomo- La seconda, invece, è l’inventario degli Apoidei Apiformi del logi abituati a “curiosare in basso”, frugando tra i substrati.
    [Show full text]
  • Trosley Country Park Management Plan 2015- 2020
    MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015-2020 TROSLEY COUNTRY PARK Trosley Country Park Management Plan 2015- 2020 Updated: November 2018 by Tim Bell- N and WK Ranger Services Manager 851561 – TROSLEY COUNTRY PARK 1 MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015-2020 TROSLEY COUNTRY PARK 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 5 1.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ............................................................................................... 5 1.2 VISION FOR THE SITE ............................................................................................................ 5 1.3 CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................ 6 1.4 HERITAGE MANAGEMENT ..................................................................................................... 7 1.5 VISITOR MANAGEMENT ......................................................................................................... 7 1.6 EDUCATION ........................................................................................................................... 8 1.7 SITE MAINTENANCE .............................................................................................................. 8 1.8 HEALTH AND SAFETY ............................................................................................................ 8 1.9 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT .................................................................................................. 9 1.10 FINANCIAL
    [Show full text]
  • The Lepidoptera of Bucharest and Its Surroundings (Romania)
    Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle © 30 Décembre Vol. LIV (2) pp. 461–512 «Grigore Antipa» 2011 DOI: 10.2478/v10191-011-0028-9 THE LEPIDOPTERA OF BUCHAREST AND ITS SURROUNDINGS (ROMANIA) LEVENTE SZÉKELY Abstract. This study presents a synthesis of the current knowledge regarding the Lepidoptera fauna of Bucharest and the surrounding areas within a distance up to 50 kilometers around the Romanian capital. Data about the fauna composition are presented: the results of the research work beginning with the end of the 19th century, as well the results of the research work carried out in the last 15 years. The research initiated and done by the author himself, led to the identification of 180 species which were unknown in the past. Even if the natural habitats from this region have undergone through radical changes in the 20th century, the area still preserves a quite rich and interesting Lepidoptera fauna. The forests provide shelter to rich populations of the hawk moth Dolbina elegans A. Bang-Haas, 1912, one of the rarest Sphingidae in Europe, and some other species with high faunistical and zoogeographical value as: Noctua haywardi (Tams, 1926) (it is new record for the Romanian fauna from this area), Catocala dilecta (Hübner, 1808), Tarachidia candefacta (Hübner, [1831]), Chrysodeixis chalcites (Esper, [1789]), Aedia leucomelas (Linnaeus, 1758), and Hecatera cappa (Hübner, [1809]). We also present and discuss the current status of the protected Lepidoptera species from the surroundings of the Romanian capital for the first time. Résumé. Ce travail représente une synthèse des connaissances actuelles concernant la faune de lépidoptères de Bucarest et de ses zones limitrophes sur un rayon de 50 km autour de la capitale de la Roumanie.
    [Show full text]
  • On the New and Rare Lepidoptera in Serbian Fauna
    Зборник Матице српске за природне науке / Matica Srpska J. Nat. Sci. Novi Sad, № 129, 73—83, 2015 UDC 595.78(497.11) DOI: 10.2298/ZMSPN1529073J Predrag N. JAKŠIĆ* University of Niš, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology and Ecology, Višegradska 33, 18000 Niš, Serbia ON THE NEW AND RARE LEPIDOPTERA IN SERBIAN FAUNA ABSTRACT: New distributional records are given for eight Lepidoptera species in Serbia. Ethmia lugubris (Staudinger, 1879) (fam. Ethmiidae) is reported in Serbia for the first time. Larval mines of Stigmella centifoliella (Zeller, 1848) (fam. Nepticulidae), photos of Hypercalia citrinalis (Scopoli, 1763) (fam. Amphisbatidae) and Cryphia amasina (Draudt, 1931) (fam. Noctuidae), as well as male genitalia of Leptidea reali Reissinger (1988) – Leptidea juvernica Williams, 1946 complex (fam. Pieridae) and Cryphia amasina are presented. UTM 10 x 10 km distribution map for three species is provided. KEYWORDS: Lepidoptera, Republic of Serbia, fauna INTRODUCTION The latest comprehensive checklist of Serbian Lepidoptera [Zečević 1996] revealed, among other things, that many families, genera and species had not been sufficiently investigated in the past, as well as that many species had not been found again for even few decades. The knowledge of the species is still insufficient: 1,355 species [Zečević 1996] compared to 4,104 species in Roma- nia [Rákosy et al., 2003], or 3,598 species in Slovakia [Pastorális et al., 2013], etc. As a result of a recent field research carried out predominantly in eastern Serbia, some interesting data for eight Lepidoptera species have been found. These faunistic data are presented in this paper. Among the recorded species, one Microlepidoptera species has not been known in Serbian fauna so far.
    [Show full text]
  • Check List of Slovenian Microlepidoptera
    Prejeto / Received: 14.6.2010 Sprejeto / Accepted: 19.8.2010 Check list of Slovenian Microlepidoptera Tone LESAR(†), Marijan GOVEDIČ1 1 Center za kartografijo favne in flore, Klunova 3, SI-1000 Ljubljana; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. A checklist of the Microlepidoptera species recorded in Slovenia is presented. Each entry is accompanied by complete references, and remarks where appropriate. Until now, the data on Microlepidopteran fauna of Slovenia have not been compiled, with the existing information scattered in literature, museums and private collections throughout Europe. The present checklist is based on records extracted from 290 literature sources published from 1763 (Scopoli) to present. In total, 1645 species from 56 families are listed. Keywords: Microlepidoptera, checklist, Slovenia, fauna Izvleček. SEZNAM METULJČKOV (MICROLEPIDOPTERA) SLOVENIJE – Predstavljen je seznam vrst metuljčkov, zabeleženih v Sloveniji. Za vsako vrsto so podane reference, kjer je bilo smiselno, pa tudi komentar. Do sedaj podatki o metuljčkih Slovenije še niso bili zbrani, obstoječi podatki pa so bili razpršeni v različnih pisnih virih, muzejskih in zasebnih zbirkah po Evropi. Predstavljeni seznam temelji na podatkih iz 290 pisnih virov, objavljenih od 1763 (Scopoli) do danes. Skupaj je navedenih 1645 vrst iz 56 družin. Ključne besede: Microlepidoptera, seznam vrst, Slovenija, živalstvo NATURA SLOVENIAE 12(1): 35-125 ZOTKS Gibanje znanost mladini, Ljubljana, 2010 36 Tone LESAR & Marijan GOVEDIČ: Check List of Slovenian Microlepidoptera / SCIENTIFIC PAPER Introduction Along with beetles (Coleoptera), butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera) are one of the most attractive groups for the amateur insect collectors, although the number of researchers professionally engaged in these two groups is relatively high as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Nota Lepidopterologica
    ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ und www.zobodat.at Nota lepid. 25 (4), published 2003: 213-220 213 Check-list of the broad-winged moths (Oecophoridae s. 1.) of Russia and adjacent countries Alexandr L. Lvovsky Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, RU- 199034 St- Petersburg, Russia; e-mail: [email protected] Summary. The distribution of Oecophoridae moths in the territory of Russia and adjacent countries (i.e. in the borders of the former USSR) is summarized. The concept of the family is taken broadly, including the subfamilies Chimabachinae, Deuterogoniinae, Pleurotinae, Oecophorinae and Amphisbatinae, but excluding Depressariinae and Autostichinae. There are 38 genera and 110 species in this territory. Nine new generic combinations are introduced. The distributions of species are recorded for every republic of the former USSR. From the data the completeness of the current knowledge of this fauna is estimated. Zusammenfassung. Die Verbreitung aller aus dem Territorium der früheren Sowjetunion bekannten Oecophoridae-Arten wird zusammenfassend dargestellt. Dabei wird die Familie einschließlich der Un- terfamilien Chimabachinae, Deuterogoniinae, Pleurotinae, Oecophorinae und Amphisbatinae, aber aus- schließlich der Depressariinae und Autostichinae aufgefaßt. Insgesamt kommen 110 Arten aus 38 Gat- tungen im Gebiet vor. Neun neue Gattungskombinationen werden eingeführt. Die Diversität der Oecophoriden wird tabellarisch für jede Teilrepublik der früheren Sowjetunion dargestellt. Die verfüg- baren Daten werden genutzt, um die derzeitige Vollständigkeit des Erfassungsgrades in den einzelnen Teilgebieten abzuschätzen. Key words. Lepidoptera, Oecophoridae, faunal diversity, Russia, adjacent countries, new combinations. Introduction The first (and the last) check-list of all Russian Lepidoptera was published many years ago (Erschoff & Field 1870).
    [Show full text]
  • Redescripción De Gonionota Mimulina (Butler) (Lepidoptera: Depressariidae)
    Research Article Biodiversity and Natural History (2016) 2(1): 40-45 Redescripción de Gonionota mimulina (Butler) (Lepidoptera: Depressariidae) A redescription of Gonionota mimulina (Butler) (Lepidoptera: Depressariidae) Francisco Urra Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, casilla 787, Santiago, Chile. *E-mail: [email protected] Resumen Se actualiza la descripción morfológica de Gonionota mimulina (Butler). Se entregan caracteres diagnósticos, fotografías del adulto e ilustraciones de la venación alar y de las estructuras genitales del macho y de la hembra. Palabras clave: zona central, Chile, Hypercalliinae, microlepidópteros, taxonomía. Abstract Morphological description of Gonionota mimulina (Butler) is updated. Diagnostic characters, photographs of adult, illustrations of wing venation and male and female genitalia are provided. Key words: central zone, Chile, Hypercalliinae, microlepidoptera, taxonomy. INTRODUCCIÓN genitalia de la hembra, el ovipositor y las apófisis son cortas (Clarke, 1964, 1968, 1971). La subfamilia Hypercalliinae (Depressariidae) incluye cuatro En Chile, este género está representado por una géneros conocidos, Hypercallia Stephens, 1829; Anchinia especie, Gonionota mimulina (Butler, 1883), distribuida Hübner, [1825]; Coptotelia Zeller, 1863 y Gonionota Zeller, entre Valparaíso y la Araucanía (Clarke, 1978). Esta especie 1877, distribuidos en Europa, Asia, Norteamérica, fue descrita por Butler (1883), quién la asignó al género Sudamérica y el sur de África (Lvovsky, 2012). Agriocoma Zeller; luego Calvert (1886)
    [Show full text]
  • Indicator Species an Important Tool When Preserving the Cultural Landscape
    Erik Andersson (edit.) Indicator Species An important tool when preserving the cultural landscape NATURESHIP-PUBLICATIONS Erik Andersson (edit.) Indicator Species An important tool when preserving the cultural landscape Anthyllis vulneraria -meadow in Saluvere Salumägi, West Estonia. Photo: Iiro Ikonen Erik Andersson from the Norrtälje Nature Conservation Foundation is the editor-in-chief of this publication. The following authors have been involved in compiling this publication: Anna Haapaniemi (Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment for Southwest Finland) Iiro Ikonen (Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment for Southwest Finland) Leif Lindgren (Finnish Forest and Park Service, Metsähallitus) Kaja Lotman (Keskkonnaamet, Environmental Board of Estonia) Ilpo Mannerkoski (Finnish Environment Institute) Marko Nieminen (Faunatica Oy) Kari Nupponen (Faunatica Oy) Mika Orjala (Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment for Southwest Finland) Juho Paukkunen (Finnish Museum of Natural History) Timo Pitkänen (Department of Geography and Geology, University of Turku) Tapio Saario (Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment for Southwest Finland) Tõnu Talvi (Keskkonnaamet, Environmental Board of Estonia) Juhani Terhivuo (Finnish Museum of Natural History) We acknowledge all experts of CEDTEs, Metsähallitus, MTT Agrifood Research Finland and the Finnish Environ- ment Institute (SYKE) for their valuable comments. ISBN 978-952-257-516-6 (printed) ISBN 978-952-257-517-3
    [Show full text]
  • Über Die Puppen Der Mitteleuropäischen Schmetterlinge
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Linzer biologische Beiträge Jahr/Year: 1997 Band/Volume: 0029_2 Autor(en)/Author(s): Patocka Jan Artikel/Article: Über die Puppen der mitteleuropäischen Schmetterlinge (Insecta: Lepidoptera): Überfamilien Yponomeutoidea, Gelechioidea, Schreckensteinoidea, Epermenoidea und Copromorphoidea. 715-751 © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Linzer biol. Beitr. 29/2 715-751 30.12.1997 Über die Puppen der mitteleuropäischen Schmetterlinge (Insecta: Lepidoptera): Überfamilien Yponomeutoidea,Gelechioidea, Schreckensteinoidea, Epermenoidea und Copromorphoidea (Mit 147 Textabbildungen) J. PATOCKA Abstract: The Central European Yponomeutoidea, Gelechioidea, Schreckensteinoidea, Epermenoidea and Copromorphoidea are defined, characterized and figured on the base of their pupae. A key for identification of superfamilies, families and subfamilies and some biological data are added. The present system of this group is discussed from the point of view of pupal characters. Key words: Lepidoptera, Yponomeutoidea, Gelechioidea, Schreckensteinoidea, Epermenoidea, Copromorphoidea, pupae, taxonomy. Einleitung Diese Arbeit knüpft an die Arbeiten von PATOcKA (1984, 1987, 1987a, 1987b, 1987c, 1988, 1988a, 1989, 1989a, 1989b, 1990, 1990a) an und behandelt die Abgrenzung, Charakteristik und Bestimmung der Überfamilien, Familien und Unterfamilien einer Gruppe puppenmorphologisch einander ähnlicher
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna Lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis - 150 Years Later: Changes and Additions
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Atalanta Jahr/Year: 2006 Band/Volume: 37 Autor(en)/Author(s): Anikin Vasily Victorovich, Sachkov Sergej A., Zolotuhin Vadim V., Lvovsky Alexandr L. Artikel/Article: Fauna Lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis - 150 years later: Changes and additions. Part 10. Oecophoridae s.l. 446-456 Atalanta (Dezember 2006) 37 (3/4): 446-456, Wurzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 „Fauna Lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis“ 150 years later: Changes and additions. Part 10. Oecophoridae s.l.1 by V a sily V. A n ik in , S er g ey A. Sachko v, V adim V. Z olotuhin & A le x a n d r L. L vovsky received 22. XI 2005 Summary: 87 species of Oecophoridae s.l. (Oecophoridae s. str., Amphisbatidae, Chimabachidae, Depressariidae) are listed for the modern Volgo-Ural fauna. 67 species are recorded from the region in addition to Eversmann ’s list from 1844. Zusammenfassung: 87 Arten der Oecophoridae s.l. (Oecophoridae s. str., Amphisbatidae, Chimabachidae, Depressariidae) werden fur die rezente Volgo-Ural-Fauna aufgefuhrt. Die Liste von E versm ann (1844) wird durch diese Arbeit um 67 Arten erweitert. Introduction: This paper is the tenth in a series of publications', dealing with the composition of the present-day fauna of oecophorid moths and their relatives in the Middle Volga and the south-western Cisurals. This region comprises of the administrative divisions of Astrakhan-, Volgograd-, Saratov-, Samara-, Uljanovsk-, Orenburg-, Uralsk- and Atyraus- (=Gurjev) Districts, together with Tataria and Bashkiria. As was accepted in previous parts of this series, only material reliably labelled and spanning the last 25 years was used for this study.
    [Show full text]