DOCSLIB.ORG

Gillnet Fishing in Macuata, Fiji

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gillnet Fishing in Macuata, Fiji GILLNET FISHING IN BACKGROUND OF MACUATA The land and coastal bounda- MACUATA, FIJI ries of the Macuata Province lie between latitude 16°5’S to 16°35’S and longitude 178°50’W INTRODUCTION to 179°45’W, on the second larg- est island of Fiji, called Vanua The purpose of this trip to Fiji Levu. The island of Vanua Levu was to review the effectiveness is composed of three large prov- of the banning of commercial inces: Macuata, Bua and gillnet fishing in Macuata Prov- Cakaudrove. Macuata is made ince on Vanua Levu. We were up of the northern portion of also asked to make recommen- 9th ofby February Esaroma for Ledua, the start of Vanua Levu and five other Integrated Fisheries dations on whether the ban the survey work. Three Fiji Fish- small islands to the north. Management Associate, should be maintained, and to eriesSouth Research Pacific Officers Commission were as- Labasa Town is the capital of advise on any other manage- signedNoumea, as full-time New Caledonia counterparts Macuata Province. ment measures relating to com- to this project. They were mercial and subsistence fishery Apisai Sesewa (team leader), Since Macuata is a dry area (av- in Macuata Province. Saiyasi Yabakivou and Jovesa erage rainfall of 4,050 mm/ Korovulavula. year), it has a climate favourable The gillnet fishing ban was im- for growing sugar cane, and posed by the Macuata chiefs in Considerable support was re- Macuata is one of the leading 1990. Unfortunately, there was ceived from the Fisheries Divi- sugar producers in Fiji. The no survey conducted at this sion, especially the provision of province of Macuata is also time, so no estimates of stock support staff, fishing gear and known for its timber and fish- abundance were available for vessels. Apart from the three ery resources. Sugar is the main future assessment and com- research staff, Extension Officer source of income, followed by parative analysis. Matai Kolinisau spent two full timber and fish respectively. weeks with the ICFMaP team. In 1995, the chiefs of Macuata Fish resources in Macuata requested Fiji Fisheries (through The Research Officer based at coastal waters appear to be the Macuata Provincial Office) Labasa, Mr Indar Dev Raj, was more in abundance compared for an assessment of the effec- also assigned to the team to as- to other areas in Fiji, especially tiveness of the ban. Fiji Fish- sist in collecting information on Viti Levu. This may be attrib- eries then requested technical commercial landings. The Fish- uted to the establishment of support from the South Pa- eries vessel Gonedau, with nine good traditional management cific Commission through the crews, was assigned to this project systems, the presence of large ICFMaP project. The Commis- for a full four-week period. areas of mangroves, an exten- sion agreed to this request, sive shallow lagoon and the and the ICFMaP team left for The commercial fishery opera- Great Sea Reef that provides Fiji in February 1996 to con- tion in the Macuata Province has shelter to the whole of Macuata’s duct this work. a lot of things to offer to other coastal zone (important as a countries in the region. It is or- source of nutrients, refuge and The ICFMaP personnel that ganised in a simple professional spawning grounds for many took part in this survey include way, which has the potential to fish species). Tim Adams, Paul Dalzell, Sione be successfully duplicated by Matoto and Esaroma Ledua. other neighbouring countries. Paul, Sione and Esaroma left Noumea for Fiji on the 6th of This includes the marketing February, and were joined by system, the storage system, Tim two weeks later. the contract system of catch- ing fish and the system of After meeting senior Fisheries paying wages. All these as- Officials in Suva on the 7th and pects of the fishery should be 8th of February, the team trav- of interest to neighbouring elled to Labasa, Macuata on the countries in the region. 25 SPC Fisheries Newsletter #78 — July/September '96 Management of fishery re- Though the chiefs were receiv- surgeonfish (18 per cent), sources in Macuata is jointly ing and benefiting from sub- trevallies (10 per cent), emper- controlled by the Fisheries Di- stantial amounts of money as ors (6 per cent) and parrot fish vision office in Labasa, as well goodwillGILLNET FISHING payments IN MACUATA, from com- FIJI (5 per cent). as the chiefs in the various dis- mercial fishermen, strong op- tricts. The Labasa Fisheries Of- position from the people forced Subsistence fishers fish harder fice is the headquarters for the the chiefs to declare the ban on when there are village functions Northern Division of the whole gillnet fishing. such as church gatherings, dis- of Vanua Levu. trict meetings, weddings, the MACUATA SUBSISTENCE birth of a first-born baby, deaths A total of twelve officers are FISHERY in the village, or other festivals. currently serving the province Subsistence fishers in Macuata of Macuata. The Fisheries Offic- Villages along the Macuata prefer to do handline fishing at ers provide resource manage- coast rely on fish as their main night, especially when the tide ment and development advice source of protein. Handline is turning on the ebb tide. to provincial councils, district fishing is the most common councils and village councils. method of catching fish. Free Handline fishing is mostly con- diving, using rubber-propelled ducted in deep areas of the la- They also provide fishermen spears, seems to be the second goon or reef channels during with services such as sales of most popular method of catch- dark nights, targeting rock cods, gear and ice, vessel licensing, ing fish in Macuata. snappers and other bottom hull and engine repairs, prepa- fishes. When the moon is full, ration of bank loan applica- Reef gleaning is also common, subsistence fishers prefer to use tions and law enforcement. combined with the use of hand handlines in the shallow sandy The chiefs, through traditional nets. This type of fishing areas of the barrier reef, target- management systems, may method is practised mainly by ing Lutjanids and Lethrinids. declare and enforce bans or women. Some fishers use hand taboos, in most cases through spears or knives to fish on reef Subsistence fishing trips in prior consultations with the flats at low tide. Macuata usually last for 8 to 12 Fisheries Division. hours at sea. On special occa- Spear fishers and reef glean- sions, fishing trips may last more GILLNET BAN ers prefer to go out at low tide. than 12 hours. In such cases, fish They try to reach selected or are smoked or cooked in earthen The chiefs of the Macuata area favourite spots before the flow ovens on uninhabited islets imposed the ban on gillnet fish- of the incoming tide. They nearest to the fishing grounds. ing in 1990. Although this is wait for fish which come in technically illegal due to gov- schools with the tide to feed in This is done to preserve fish in ernment ownership of all re- shallow water. order to allow fishers to stay sources and the seabed, the longer at sea. Ice is rarely used chiefs used their traditional Fishermen prefer early morn- in Macuata for subsistence powers to impose the ban. The ing tides or late afternoon tides. needs. This is due mainly to the government recognises the tra- Our observations while visiting unavailability of proper ice ditional systems in Fiji, and villages in Macuata showed boxes and the problem of acces- therefore endorsed the ban on that invertebrates, mainly mol- sibility to ice plants. gillnet fishing. luscs, constitute about 17 per cent of the subsistence landings. Although gillnet fishing has Among the reasons why the been banned in Macuata since government endorsed the Groupers and coral trout ac- 1990, the chiefs continue to gillnet ban were the numerous counted for about 30 per cent of grant exemptions to subsist- complaints about the negative the total catch, with other sig- ence fishermen whenever there effects of commercial gillnetting nificant contributions from is a big village function, par- on subsistence-fishery catch re- ticularly when large volumes quirements. Subsistence fisher- of fish are required. men were experiencing difficul- ties meeting their subsistence It is estimated that gillnets are requirements. deployed in each village on an 26 SPC Fisheries Newsletter #78 — July/September '96 average of about 10 times per prepare for spawning. At this handline fishing and are gener- year only. Subsistence gillnet time it is not unusual for fish to ally not in favour of lifting the fishing in the Macuata area be served for all three meals in ban on commercial gillnet fish- does not, therefore, appear to be mostGILLNET village FISHING homes. IN MACUATA, FIJI ing. This is due mainly to eco- excessive. nomic reasons, as the commer- COMMERCIAL FISHERY cial fishermen have converted Gillnets used by these subsist- their operations to handline ence fishermen are usually Since gillnetting is banned in fishing. around less than 300 m in length, Macuata, commercial fishermen and therefore much shorter in have shifted to handline fishing It would be costly to convert length than those used by com- for demersal reef stocks on the back to net fishing, and they mercial fishermen, who deploy Great Sea Reef. There were a believe that if commercial gill- nets of more than a kilometre in total of 289 commercial fisher- netting was permitted again, length. It was also noted that men licensed in 1995 and a simi- it is most likely that it would nets used for subsistence pur- lar number is expected for 1996. again be banned in a few poses were much shallower in years’ time.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Static Fishing Around Fish Aggregating Devices (Fads) and Offshore Banks
    SPC Fisheries Newsletter # 42 Page 27 STATIC FISHING AROUND FISH AGGREGATING DEVICES (FADS) AMD OFFSHORE BANKS IN AMERICAN SAMOA by Michael Crook Leilani Enterprises, Inc Pago Pago, American Samoa This work was carried out as part of Pacific Fisheries Development Foundation Project No 44a. Experimental static handline fishing around FADs was first attempted in American Samoa in 1978-9 by Pat Brian who was associated with the first generation of FADs to be deployed here. No formal reports or records were made describing the gear, techniques or catch, but word-of-mouth reports indicate that this work was mildly successful. The most recent generation of FADs was deployed in late 1984 following a period of over a year where there were no buoys at all. During this period trolling had become nearly unprofitable due to rising fuel costs and the increasing scarcity of fish, often attributed to the influx of tuna superseiners to this area. Now the buoys have brought the fish but trolling can stiil be uneconomical when the fish are either not feeding on the surface or not biting on artificial lures, which is often the case in very calm weather or during mid-day hours. The purpose of this programme was to investigate the feasibility of static fishing for the pelagic species usually caught by trolling around FADs and offshore banks e.g. yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares), bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus), skipjack {Katsuwonus pelamis), wahoo (Acanthocybium solandn) and dolphin fish (Coryphaena hippurus). (P SWAINS a lORl^C VOLOSEGA 'E' FAD n 3 miles TA U /-'^Paao sJ AUNU'U V C~?ago| ^o BANK \ , \_^J 20 miles \ / 5 miles" ^ FAD y TUTUILA w^-> ( 3 miles [ 'c' 0 FAD 35 miles 40 miles "SOUTHEAST " SOUTH BANK Figure 1: Tutuila Island, American Samoa, showing FAD position and areas fished PSger?28! SPCi FisherJesrvWews letters #42; Mettibds (arM ;:inaterialsn Oi'NTASSflSDA n&''~\ mtU^/i Slli'^m-i orh"-t The sixteen trips made between December 1984 and April 1985 were aboard the 40 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Techniques Used Around Fish Aggregation Devices in French Polynesia
    SPC/Fisheries 22/WP.14 27 July 1990 ORIGINAL : FRENCH SOUTH PACIFIC COMMISSION TWENTY-SECOND REGIONAL TECHNICAL MEETING ON FISHERIES (Noumea, New Caledonia 6-10 August, 1990) FISHING TECHNIQUES USED AROUND FISH AGGREGATION DEVICES IN FRENCH POLYNESIA by F. Leproux, G. Moarii, S. Yen EVAAM, B.P. 20, Papeete, Tahiti, French Polynesia 643/90 SPC/Fisheries 22/WP.14 Page 1 FISHING TECHNIQUES USED AROUND FISH AGGREGATION DEVICES IN FRENCH POLYNESIA Mooring FADs in French Polynesian waters, which began in June 1981, has had a favourable impact on local fishermen who, although they were sceptical to begin with, have come to use this assistance increasingly, many of them finding it very helpful. The techniques of fishing around FADs have changed over the years and in 1990 four are still currently in use, while new techniques are constantly being developed and taught in order to obtain better yields. 1. FISHING TECHNIQUES 1.1 Handline fishing Many small boats (3 to 6m) do deep fishing near FADs when a school of tuna is present. The handline is made of nylon line of 130 kg and a tuna hook (cf Diagram no. 1, Plate no. 1). The bait used varies with the season: thus "operu" (Decapterus macarellus), "ature" (Selar crumennhialmus), "numa" (Mulloidichihys samoensis), "marara" (Cysselurus simus), and skipjack fillet (Katsuwonus pelamis) are the most commonly used. The technique consists in placing this bait low down in the school. In order to facilitate the drop of the line, a stone is fixed to it temporarily. When the fisherman considers that he has reached the required depth, he gives the line a sharp jerk upwards which releases the stone and also some crumbs which awake the tunas' appetite.
    [Show full text]
  • FIJI Building Inclusive Institutions for Sustained Growth COUNTRY DIAGNOSTIC STUDY
    FIJI BUILDING INCLUSIVE InstitUTIONS foR SUstained GROWTH COUNTRY DIAGNOSTIC STUDY ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK FIJI BUILDING INCLUSIVE InstitUTIONS foR SUstained GROWTH COUNTRY DIAGNOSTIC STUDY Economic Research and Regional Cooperation Department November 2015 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) © 2015 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 632 4444; Fax +63 2 636 2444 www.adb.org; openaccess.adb.org Some rights reserved. Published in 2015. Printed in the Philippines. ISBN 978-92-9257-099-6 (Print), 978-92-9257-100-9 (e-ISBN) Publication Stock No. RPT157617-2 Cataloging-In-Publication Data Asian Development Bank Fiji: Building inclusive institutions for sustained growth. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2015. 1. Economic development. 2. Fiji. I. Asian Development Bank. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuna Fishing and a Review of Payaos in the Philippines
    Session 1 - Regional syntheses Tuna fishing and a review of payaos in the Philippines Jonathan O. Dickson*1', Augusto C. Nativiclacl(2) (1) Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources, 860 Arcadia Bldg., Quezon Avenue, Quezon City 3008, Philippines - [email protected] (2) Frabelle Fishing Company, 1051 North Bay Blvd., Navotas, Metro Manila, Philippines Abstract Payao is a traditional concept, which has been successfully commercialized to increase the landings of several species valuable to the country's export and local industries. It has become one of the most important developments in pelagic fishing that significantly contributed to increased tuna production and expansion of purse seine and other fishing gears. The introduction of the payao in tuna fishing in 1975 triggered the rapid development of the tuna and small pelagic fishery. With limited management schemes and strategies, however, unstable tuna and tuna-like species production was experienced in the 1980s and 1990s. In this paper, the evolution and development of the payao with emphasis on the technological aspect are reviewed. The present practices and techniques of payao in various parts of the country, including its structure, ownership, distribution, and fishing operations are discussed. Monitoring results of purse seine/ringnet operations including handline using payao in Celebes Sea and Western Luzon are presented to compare fishing styles and techniques, payao designs and species caught. The fishing gears in various regions of the country for harvesting payao are enumerated and discussed. The inshore and offshore payaos in terms of sea depth, location, designs, fishing methods and catch composi- tion are also compared. Fishing companies and fisherfolk associations involved in payao operation are presented to determine extent of uti- lization and involvement in the municipal and commercial sectors of the fishing industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Setting Priorities for Marine Conservation in the Fiji Islands Marine Ecoregion Contents
    Setting Priorities for Marine Conservation in the Fiji Islands Marine Ecoregion Contents Acknowledgements 1 Minister of Fisheries Opening Speech 2 Acronyms and Abbreviations 4 Executive Summary 5 1.0 Introduction 7 2.0 Background 9 2.1 The Fiji Islands Marine Ecoregion 9 2.2 The biological diversity of the Fiji Islands Marine Ecoregion 11 3.0 Objectives of the FIME Biodiversity Visioning Workshop 13 3.1 Overall biodiversity conservation goals 13 3.2 Specifi c goals of the FIME biodiversity visioning workshop 13 4.0 Methodology 14 4.1 Setting taxonomic priorities 14 4.2 Setting overall biodiversity priorities 14 4.3 Understanding the Conservation Context 16 4.4 Drafting a Conservation Vision 16 5.0 Results 17 5.1 Taxonomic Priorities 17 5.1.1 Coastal terrestrial vegetation and small offshore islands 17 5.1.2 Coral reefs and associated fauna 24 5.1.3 Coral reef fi sh 28 5.1.4 Inshore ecosystems 36 5.1.5 Open ocean and pelagic ecosystems 38 5.1.6 Species of special concern 40 5.1.7 Community knowledge about habitats and species 41 5.2 Priority Conservation Areas 47 5.3 Agreeing a vision statement for FIME 57 6.0 Conclusions and recommendations 58 6.1 Information gaps to assessing marine biodiversity 58 6.2 Collective recommendations of the workshop participants 59 6.3 Towards an Ecoregional Action Plan 60 7.0 References 62 8.0 Appendices 67 Annex 1: List of participants 67 Annex 2: Preliminary list of marine species found in Fiji. 71 Annex 3 : Workshop Photos 74 List of Figures: Figure 1 The Ecoregion Conservation Proccess 8 Figure 2 Approximate
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Sea Reef Weaving Together Communities for Conservation
    CASE STUDY FIJI 2017 THE GREAT SEA REEF WEAVING TOGETHER COMMUNITIES FOR CONSERVATION Weaving together communities for conservation page 1 WWF-PACIFIC VISION Our vision is for empowered and resilient Pacific island CONTENts communities living our unique culture to conserve and manage our ocean, forests and rivers for improved food security, human well-being and a sustainable future. CAKAULEVu – FIJI’S HIDDEN GEM 5 PROTECTING CAKAULEVu – eVERYONE’S BUSINESS 10 WWF MISSION WWF’s mission is to stop the degradation of the planet’s natural environment and to TOOLS AND AppROACHEs – 12 BEYOND SMALL TABU AREAS build a future in which humans live in harmony with nature by : • Conserving the world’s biological diversity; Marine Protected Areas – the tabu system 12 • Ensuring that the use of renewable natural resources is sustainable; The Fiji Locally Managed Marine Area Network (FLMMA) 12 • Promoting the reduction of pollution and wasteful consumption. ________________________________ Turtle Monitors – from hunter to guardian 14 Text compiled by Seema Deo. Sustainable Fisheries — setting smarter limits 15 Layout and Graphics by Kalo Williams. Raising the Fish Value — improving postharvest handling 16 SPECIAL THANKS TO WWF staff Kesaia Tabunakawai, Jackie Thomas, Qela Waqabitu, Tui Marseu, and Vilisite Tamani, for providing information for the report. Sustainable Seafood — a reef-to-resort approach 17 Exploring Alternatives to Fisheries — 18 Published in April 2017 by WWF-Pacific, World Wide Fund For Nature, Suva, Fiji. support through microfinancing Any reproduction in full or in part must mention the title and credit as the copyright owner. Women in Fisheries — building a business approach 18 © Text 2017 WWF Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Fisheries E, Agriculture
    Women in fisheries #27 - Dec. 2016 information bulletin ISSN 1028-7752 Editor’s note Welcome to the 27th issue of the Women in Fisheries Bulletin, which highlights gender roles in coastal fisheries, women’s fishing activities in urban and rural communities, and gender issues in development. In this issue, the first article relates to the Fijian supply chain and marketing of the seagrapes, Caulerpa racemosa. The authors, Cherie Morris and Shirleen Bala, describe the harvesting and marketing sites for Caulerpa. Approxi- Inside this issue mately 70% of the crop is from the Yasawa Islands in the Western Division. It is sold in a number of urban markets, with the main municipal market located in Suva. Caulerpa is sold by portion (heaps), at prices ranging from Supply chain and marketing of seagrapes, FJD 2.00–4.00 (≈ USD 1.00–2.00) per heap, the weight of which ranges Caulerpa racemosa (Forsskaål) J. Agardh from 250–300 grams. (Chlorophyta: Caulerpaceae) in Fiji The peak marketing days Cherie Morris and Shirleen Bala p. 3 of Caulerpa in Fiji are Fri- Changing patterns in household days and Saturdays. Fresh, membership, changing economic harvested stock arrives in activities and roles of men and the main markets (Suva women in Matokana Village, Onoilau, Fiji and Lautoka) by Thursday afternoon. Some harvesters Veikila Vuki p. 9 do their own retailing but most stock is sold directly Gender issues in culture, agriculture to wholesalers and market and fisheries in Fiji vendors in Lautoka, Nadi, Veikila C. Vuki and Aliti Vunisea p. 15 Sigatoka and Suva. Most harvesters located on Vanua The participation of women in Levu, Fiji’s second largest fishing activities in Fiji island, retail their own stock Aliti Vunisea p.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Sea Reef
    A Living Icon Insured Sustain-web of life creating it-livelihoods woven in it Fiji’s Great Sea Reef Foreword Fiji’s Great Sea Reef (GSR), locally known as ‘Cakaulevu’ or ‘Bai Kei Viti’, remain one of the most productive and biologically diverse reef systems in the Southern Hemisphere. But despite its uniqueness and diversity it remains the most used with its social, cultural, economic and environmental value largely ignored. A Living Icon Insured Stretching for over 200km from the north eastern tip of Udu point in Vanua Levu to Bua at the north- Sustain-web of life creating it-livelihoods woven in it west edge of Vanua Levu, across the Vatu-i-ra passage, veering off along the way, to hug the coastline of Ra and Ba provinces and fusing into the Yasawa Islands, the Great Sea Reef snakes its way across the Fiji’s Great Sea Reef western sections of Fiji’s ocean. Also referred to as Fiji’s Seafood Basket, the reef feeds up to 80 percent of Fiji’s population.There are estimates that the reef system contributes between FJD 12-16 million annually to Fiji’s economy through the inshore fisheries sector, a conservative value. The stories in this book encapsulates the rich tapestry of interdependence between individuals and communities with the GSR, against the rising tide of challenges brought on by climate change through ocean warming and acidification, coral bleaching, sea level rise, and man-made challenges of pollution, overfishing and loss of habitat in the face of economic development. But all is not lost as communities and individuals are strengthened through sheer determination to apply their traditional knowledge, further strengthened by science and research to safeguard and protect the natural resource that is home and livelihood.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies and Reviews N.81
    GENERAL FISHERIES COMMISSION FOR THE MEDITERRANEAN ISSN 1020-9549 STUDIES AND REVIEWS No. 81 2007 The purpose of this study is to provide a snapshot of recreational fisheries legal frameworks RECREATIONAL FISHERIES IN THE within the Mediterranean with a view to promoting homogeneous and comprehensive recreational MEDITERRANEAN COUNTRIES: A REVIEW fisheries management in the Mediterranean. The study reviews the existing laws and regulations OF EXISTING LEGAL FRAMEWORKS concerning recreational fisheries adopted by Mediterranean countries. It provides first an overview of relevant international initiatives regarding the management of recreational fisheries and a summary of marine recreational fisheries within the Mediterranean basin. The core of the study focuses on a comparative analysis of the main management measures adopted by States, including: (i) access regimes to fisheries resources; (ii) conservation measures; (iii) special recreational fisheries regulations; and (iv) monitoring, control and surveillance of recreational fisheries. ISBN 978-92-5-105898-5 ISSN 1020-9549 9 7 8 9 2 5 1 0 5 8 9 8 5 TC/M/A1500E/1/11.07/1125 STUDIES AND REVIEWS No. 81 GENERAL FISHERIES COMMISSION FOR THE MEDITERRANEAN RECREATIONAL FISHERIES IN THE MEDITERRANEAN COUNTRIES: A REVIEW OF EXISTING LEGAL FRAMEWORKS by Charline Gaudin Legal Assistant Development and Planning Service FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department and Cassandra De Young Fishery Planning Analyst Development and Planning Service FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2007 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawai'i Pelagic Handline Fisheries: History, Trends, and Current Status
    Hawai‘i Pelagic Handline Fisheries: History, Trends, and Current Status - Final Background Document - Prepared for the WESTERN PACIFIC FISHERY MANAGEMENT COUNCIL by Impact Assessment, Inc. Pacific Islands Office [email protected] March 2007 IMPACT ASSESSMENT, INC. Pacific Islands Office 2950 C Pacific Heights Road Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Mr. Paul Dalzell, Senior Scientist Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council 1164 Bishop Street, Suite 1400 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 March 8, 2007 Dear Mr. Dalzell, We are pleased to submit this final report for the project titled Background Document on the Offshore Handline and Shortline Fishery (Phase I). Per WPRFMC Contract 06-WPC-11, the report was previously delivered in draft form for distribution at the Council’s 91st Science and Statistical Committee Meeting, and at the 131st Council Meeting. We would like to express our appreciation for the opportunity to assist the Council in better understanding the history and contemporary status of the offshore handline fleet in the Main Hawaiian Islands. Additional description and analysis of the fleets will be provided in our FY 2007 report to the Pelagic Fisheries Research Program at the University of Hawaii at Manoa, Mahalo nui loa for your diligent monitoring of this important project. We look forward to undertaking similar research in support of the Council’s sustainable fisheries management objectives throughout the Western Pacific. Sincerely, Edward W. Glazier, Ph.D. Principal Investigator Acknowledgements We wish to thank and acknowledge the
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Lethal Seal Deterrent in the North East Scotland Handline Mackerel Fishery
    Non-Lethal Seal Deterrent in the North East Scotland Handline Mackerel Fishery. A Trial using Targeted Acoustic Startle Technology (TAST) David Whyte, Thomas Götz, Sam F. Walmsley and Vincent M. Janik 1 Contents Project Team ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Funding ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Fishing methods .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Trial Methodology ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Data analysis .............................................................................................................................................. 13 Results ....................................................................................................................................................... 15 Discussion .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Filling the Gaps: Identifying Candidate Sites to Expand Fiji's National Protected Area Network
    Filling the gaps: identifying candidate sites to expand Fiji's national protected area network Outcomes report from provincial planning meeting, 20-21 September 2010 Stacy Jupiter1, Kasaqa Tora2, Morena Mills3, Rebecca Weeks1,3, Vanessa Adams3, Ingrid Qauqau1, Alumeci Nakeke4, Thomas Tui4, Yashika Nand1, Naushad Yakub1 1 Wildlife Conservation Society Fiji Country Program 2 National Trust of Fiji 3 ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University 4 SeaWeb Asia-Pacific Program This work was supported by an Early Action Grant to the national Protected Area Committee from UNDP‐GEF and a grant to the Wildlife Conservation Society from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation (#10‐94985‐000‐GSS) © 2011 Wildlife Conservation Society This document to be cited as: Jupiter S, Tora K, Mills M, Weeks R, Adams V, Qauqau I, Nakeke A, Tui T, Nand Y, Yakub N (2011) Filling the gaps: identifying candidate sites to expand Fiji's national protected area network. Outcomes report from provincial planning meeting, 20‐21 September 2010. Wildlife Conservation Society, Suva, Fiji, 65 pp. Executive Summary The Fiji national Protected Area Committee (PAC) was established in 2008 under section 8(2) of Fiji's Environment Management Act 2005 in order to advance Fiji's commitments under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)'s Programme of Work on Protected Areas (PoWPA). To date, the PAC has: established national targets for conservation and management; collated existing and new data on species and habitats; identified current protected area boundaries; and determined how much of Fiji's biodiversity is currently protected through terrestrial and marine gap analyses.
    [Show full text]