Orbs in Pictures of the Sun

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Orbs in Pictures of the Sun Orbs in pictures of the sun Continue The backscatter of the camera's flash of motes of dust causes unfocused orb-shaped photographic artifacts. In photography, the backscatter (also called near-camera reflection[1]) is an optical phenomenon that results in typically circular artifacts on an image, due to the camera's flash reflected from unfocused motes of dust, water droplets, or other particles in the air or water. It is especially common with modern compact and ultra-compact digital cameras. [3] [3] A hypothetical underwater instance with two conditions in which circular photographic artifacts are probable (A) and unlikely (B), depending on whether the aspect of particles facing the lens directly reflects the flash, as shown. Elements do not appear to scale. Caused by the backscatter of light of unfocused particles, these artifacts are also sometimes referred to as orbs, citing a common paranormal claim. Some appear with tracks, suggesting movement. [4] Cause circular unfocused visual artifacts caused by raindrops. Additional information: Light scattering of particles and Defocus-aberration Backscatter usually occurs in low light scenes when the camera flash is used. Cases include night time and underwater photography, when a bright light source and reflective unfocused particles are close to the camera. [1] Light appears much brighter much near the source due to the inverse-square law, which says light intensity is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source. [5] The artifact may be the result of backscatter or retroreflection of the light from airborne solid particles, such as dust or pollen, or liquid droplets, especially rain or fog. They can also be caused by foreign material within the camera lens. [4] The image artifacts usually appear as either white or semi-transparent circles, but may also occur with full or partial color spectra, purple fringing, or other chromatic aberration. With raindrops, an image can capture light passing through the droplet, creating a small rainbow effect. [6] Fujifilm describes the artifacts as a common photographic problem: There is always a certain amount of dust floating around in the air. You may have noticed this in the cinema when you look up at the light coming from the film projector and notice the bright sparks floating around in the beam. Similarly, there are always dust particles floating around nearby when taking pictures with your camera. When using the flash, the light from the flash reflects off the dust particles and is sometimes captured in your shot. Of course dust particles very close to the camera are blurred because they are not in focus, but because they reflect the light more strongly than the more distant main part of the shot, that reflected light can sometimes be captured by the camera and recorded on the resulting image as round white spots. So these dots are blurry images of dust In underwater scenes, particles such as sand or plankton marine life reflect near the lens, invisible to the diver, light from the lightning that causes the orb artifact in the image. A strobe flash, which distances the flash from the lens, eliminates artifacts. [7] The effect is also visible on infrared camcorders, where superbright infrared LEDs illuminate microscopic particles very close to the lens. The artifacts are particularly common with compact or ultra-compact cameras, where the short distance between the lens and the built-in flash reduces the angle of light reflection to the lens, directly illuminating the particles facing the lens, and increasing the camera's ability to capture the light reflected from normally subvisible particles. [2] A single orb in the center of the photo, on the person's knee level Paranormal claims Some paranormal investigators have referred to orbs appearing in photographs from allegedly paranormal sources. [8] Others[who?] have claimed that orbs are an unknown kind of creature, partly based on perceived intent in the movements of the orbs. Such beliefs have been interpreted by Michael Shermer as examples of agenticity. [10] Paranormal investigators Joe Nickell and Brian Dunning have agreed that orbs are the result of natural phenomena such as insects, dust, pollen or water droplets. [11] [12] See also Bokeh Digital artifact Entoptic phenomenon Lens flare Rod (optics) Rolling shutter Will-o'-the-wisp References ^ a b Robinson, Edward M. (12 June 2016). Crime scene photography. Academic pressure. p. 558. ISBN 978-0-12-802768-4. ^ a b c d Flash reflections from liquid dust particles. Fujifilm. Filed from original on July 27, 2005. Retrieved 2017-06-19. ^ Baron, Cynthia (2008). Adobe Photoshop Forensics: Sleuths, Truths and Fauxtography. Cengage Learning. p. 310. ISBN 1-59863-643-X. ^ a b Grimm, Tom; Grimm, Michelle (1997). The basic book of photography. Plume (original from Pennsylvania State University). p. 509. Retrieved 2017-06-19. An additional problem known as the backscatter occurs when flash lights striking these suspended particles reflect back to the camera lens and record on the film as fuzzy white spots. Of course, the backscatter can also be reduced by getting the camera as close to your subjects as possible, because the shorter that distance, the fewer the number of liquid particles in front of the lens. ^ Richard Ferncase. Basic Lighting Worktext for movies and video. CRC Press; 22 April 1992. ISBN 978-1-136-04418-2. p. 66. ^ J. David Pye. Polarized light in science and nature. CRC Press; 6 May 2015. ISBN 978-1-4200-3368-7. p. 81. ^ Nick Robertson-Brown. Underwater Photography: Art and Techniques. Crowood; 31 January 2014. ISBN 978-1-84797-658-1. p. 105. Wagner, Stephen (29 January 2017). Why Orbs in pictures is not evidence of the paranormal. ThoughtCo. Retrieved June 27, 2017. ^ Klaus; Ledwith, Miceal (2007). Orb project. Beyond Words Publishing. p. 23. ISBN 9781416575535. Retrieved June 27, 2017. ^ Radford, Benjamin (2017). Orbs as Plasma Life. Skeptical inquirer. 41 (5): 28–29. ^ Joe Nickell.ISBN 0-8131-2691-6. p. 159. Dunning, Brian (February 24, 2007). Skeptoid #29: Orbs: The ghost of the camera. Skeptoid. Retrieved June 15, 2017. Wikimedia Commons has media related to Photographic Orbs. Retrieved from Wait, what?! What the hell is that smear ball in that picture you just took? Did you put your finger in front of the lens again? Did you breathe too hard and fog the lens up? Ew, is that a creepy ghost we're seeing? The illuminated, circular spots in images are called orbs, and they have been racking people's brains regularly, thanks to digital photography. There are several explanations for these balls of brightness. What theory do you believe in? People have called these forms angels or spirits for years. Believers notice a lot of orbs in pictures taken at special family gatherings, church services, or in spiritual places. Do photos taken at these events pick up the dust in the air at a wedding reception, or are they the guardian angels blessing (or maybe trying to destroy) the tray? Hey, maybe good grandma thought he was a loser! Related Articles Meaning Of Blue Orbs What Does Green Orbs Mean? The meaning of White Orb's Pictures taken during church services often shows golden orbs on or near the clergy, participants or depictions of gods and holy people. These orbs usually lie behind a person or object, so they obviously can't be labeled as a reflection. Believers often take these appearances as proof that the light seen in every photograph is indeed an angel. Many ancient religious texts describe angels in terms of light or as beings of light. However, there is no scientific evidence that orbs are angels. Maybe we all just want to believe? 2. Excuse me, but Your Halo's Shows Beyonce' can see your halo, but are they visible to the average human eye, too? An article GeorgeDStewart.com seems to say so, and it's about our past. He correlates modern orbs taken in photographs with halos previously depicted in works of art for hundreds of years. What if the old, European dudes who painted spheres or globes of light behind the heads of Christian saints actually build this idea away from the observations of orbs? Did they try to correlate orbs with something of spiritual significance, or did they maybe just hit the wine a little too hard that day? Halos are a big reason why people think orbs can be angelic, but as we've already mentioned, there's no scientific evidence for any of this. It's still fun to believe though, isn't it? 3. Ghoul-tastic Ghost Orbs Who to Call?! Paranormal believers Ghost hunters believe that spirit orbs are energy patterns of ghost or entities. Ugh! They believe spirits glow and show off a sheen of gold, green, blue or crimson light, especially in pictures. Some say that moving orbs in movies or clips are ghosts too because they, well, move, but there are other explanations for it. There are some who even think they've seen faces in orbs when they zoom in, and really, no alcohol or drug addiction was involved! Scary. Believers point to the appearance of orbs in images of supposedly haunted places. But a careful study comparing the number of globe photographs taken in supposedly haunted locations and the amount of orbs photographed in random locations has never been completed. Maybe that's what needs to be done to come to the conclusion that a orb is in fact a ghost. Either way, it's fun (and ghoul-tastic) to pretend they are, don't you think? 4. Time to Break Out the Feather Pond? Relax and clean up, people! You are probably not haunted or followed by a dead relative or lost ghost if you see orbs in your pictures.
Recommended publications
  • Macro References and Glossary Ofterms.Docx
    Glossary of terms for Macro Photography Achromatic lens A lens that brings at least two wavelengths (typically red and blue) into focus in the same plane, thereby limiting the effects of chromatic and spherical aberration Airy disk and Airy pattern Descriptions of the best focused spot of light that a perfect lens with a circular aperture can make, limited by the diffraction of light Angle of view (AOV) The angular extent of a given scene that is imaged by a camera Aperture control filter An adapter that fits on the rear of a reversed lens to m anually control the aperture Astigmatism Light rays that propagate in two perpendicular planes have different foci Asymmetric lens A lens where the aperture appears to have different dimensions when viewed from the front and from the back Bellows A pleated light -tight ex ten sible part in a camera between the film plane and the lens Circle of confusion (CoC) The optical spot caused by a cone of light rays from a lens not coming to a perfect focus when imaging a point source (also known as a disk of confusion) Close focus distance See minimum focus distance Close -up lens A single or multi -element lens that fi ts on the filter t hread of a primary lens to increase magnification Close -up photography Images taken close to the subject typically with magnifications of ~0.1X to ~1X Coma or comatic aberration A lens aberration due to imperfections in a lens , or other components, that results in off-axis point sources appearing to have a tail (coma) similar to a comet Chromatic a berration (or An optical effect when a lens is unable to bring all wavelengths of colo ur to the same colour/purple fringing) focal plane, and/or when wavelengths of different colours are focused at different positions in the focal plane.
    [Show full text]
  • Optical Performance:: Characterization of a Pupillometric Camera
    RELATED TITLES Documents Science & Tech Tech Digital & Social Media 58 views 0 0 Abb Uploaded by Mabel Ruiz AP-Physical Low Light Manual Twilight Retrato Science Sample Photography for Render 1.4.5 Aberration document explaining the Seidel coefficients Full description Save Embed Share Print S-118.4250 PPOSTGRADUATE SEMINAR ON ILLUMINATION ENGINEERING ,, SSPRING 2008 LLIGHTING UUNIT,, DDEPARTMENT OF EELECTRONICS,, HHELSINKI UUNIVERSITY OF TTECHNOLOGY (TKK) OPTICAL PERFORMANCE:: CHARACTERIZATION OF A PUPILLOMETRIC CAMERA Petteri Teikari,, [email protected] Emmi Rautkylä,, emmi.rautkylä@tkk.fi RELATED TITLES Documents Science & Tech Tech Digital & Social Media 58 views 0 0 Abb Uploaded by Mabel Ruiz AP-Physical Low Light Manual Twilight Retrato Science Sample Photography for Render 1.4.5 Aberration document explaining the Seidel coefficients Full description Save Embed Share Print RELATED TITLES Documents Science & Tech Tech Digital & Social Media 58 views 0 0 Abb Uploaded by Mabel Ruiz AP-Physical Low Light Manual Twilight Retrato Science Sample Photography for Render 1.4.5 Aberration document explaining the Seidel coefficients Full description Save Embed Share Print TABLE OF CONTENTS A A BSTRACT .................................................................................................................................. TT ABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................2 11 IINTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • The Essential A-Z of Photography Slang Artifact a Loose Term To
    The essential A-Z of photography slang Artifact A loose term to describe an element that degrades picture quality. Anything from the blockiness that can occur when pictures are heavily compressed as JPEGs, to the distortion to pictures that occurs with heavy manipulation – even the effect you see with lens flare. ATGNI All The Gear, No Idea. A photographer who has lots of camera equipment but doesn’t know what half of it does. A bit of an Uncle Bob, in fact. BIF A rare acronym that you’ll only see floating around bird photography forums (download our free bird photography cheat sheet). There’s a clue right there: BIF stands for Bird in Flight, and is usually brought up during lengthy technical discussions about autofocus point selection and focus modes. Bigma The Sigma 50-500mm f/4-6.3 lens earned the nickname ‘Bigma’ thanks to its considerable 10x zoom range and considerable proportions. Blown out Bright areas in a photo that are overexposed are said to be blown out. They won’t hold any detail and will be bleached white. Bokeh Pronounced ‘boh-kay’, this term is derived from the Japanese word for ‘blur’ and is used to describe the aesthetic quality of the blur in out- of-focus areas of a picture. The faster the lens, and the more aperture blades it has, the smoother the blur tends to be. Chimping The act of looking at pictures on the back of the camera as soon as you’ve taken them, usually accompanied by lots of ‘ooh-ooh-oohing’, hence the name.
    [Show full text]
  • Assignment 4: Raw Material
    Computer Science E-7: Exposing Digital Photography Harvard Extension School Fall 2010 Raw Material Assignment #4. Due 5:30PM on Tuesday, November 23, 2010. Part I. Pick Your Brain! (40 points) Type your answers for the following questions in a word processor; we will accept Word Documents (.doc, .docx), PDF documents (.pdf), or plaintext files (.txt, .rtf). Do not submit your answers for this part to Flickr. Instead, before the due date, attach the file to an email and send it to us at this address: ! [email protected] 1. (2 points) What are two advantages of JPEG over RAW? 2. (2 points) Which color space should you employ for general use? 3. (2 points) Why is white balance measured in degrees Kelvin? 4. (2 points) List two reasons why batteries in digital SLRs tend to last longer than those in compact digital cameras. 5. (2 points) Why is calibrating your monitor important? 6. (3 points) What is a tone curve and why is it necessary? 7. (3 points) Many digital cameras are advertised as having a crop factor. What does this mean? What are some of its advantages and disadvantages? 8. (3 points) Assume you have two sources of light: incandescent light at an approximate color temperature of 3000 K, and the sun with an approximate color temperature of 6000 K. Which source produces warmer tones? If you take two properly-exposed photographs of a white sheet of paper, one photo in each scene, with your camera set at a white balance of 4500 K, in which photo would the paper appear warmer? 1 of 6 Computer Science E-7: Exposing Digital Photography Harvard Extension School Fall 2010 9.
    [Show full text]
  • What Are Orbs?
    What are Orbs? by Melissa Tanner, TnT Paranormal Investigators LLC A much heated debate in paranormal field surrounds orbs. The debate is around: What are they? Are they spirits? Are the just dust or air particles? Are they bugs? All of the above. Most experts agree the orbs we see in photographs are airborne particles and/or bugs. A true paranormal orb will be able to be seen with the naked eye. Those types of orbs are believed to be balls of energy. The source of that energy is unknown. The following information was obtained from Wikipedia: Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orb_(optics) A single orb in the center of the photo, at the person's knee level The term orb describes unexpected, typically circular artifacts that occur in flash photography — sometimes with trails indicating motion — especially common with modern compact and ultra- compact digital cameras. Orbs are also sometimes called backscatter, orb backscatter, or near-camera reflection. Orb artifacts are captured during low-light instances where the camera's flash is implemented, such as at night or underwater. The artifacts are especially common with compact or ultra- compact cameras, where the short distance between the lens and the built-in flash decreases the angle of light reflection to the lens, directly illuminating the aspect of the particles facing the lens and increasing the camera's ability to capture the light reflected off normally sub-visible particles.[1] The orb artifact can result from retroreflection of light off solid particles (e.g., dust, pollen), liquid particles (water droplets, especially rain) or other foreign material within the camera lens.[1] The image artifacts usually appear as either white or semi-transparent circles, though may also occur with whole or partial color spectrums, purple fringing or other chromatic aberration.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Manual EN
    DxO Optics Pro V4.5 Reference Manual DxO Optics Pro V4.5 Reference Manual ©DxO Labs 2007 - 1 - All rights reserved DxO Optics Pro V4.5 Reference Manual Contents Introduction 4 Introducing DxO Optics Pro V4 Chapter 1 6 A typical image enhancement session from A to Z Selecting images to create a project Organizing your project Enhancing the images in your project Processing a batch of images Viewing the results! Common actions Note for users of previous versions Chapter 2 9 Select your photos from various sources The thumbnails and their buttons Star-ranking Adding images Fully automatic operation Chapter 3 12 Organize your images on an electronic light-table The big picture Adapt your workspace Chapter 4 14 Enhance your images using DxO Optics Pro Tools Corrections Palette Guided or Expert? Eight corrections palettes Chapter 5 18 Process as many images as you want with just one click Process the stars Define output formats Chapter 6 20 View the results of your work (with a little help from DxO) Chapter 7 21 How to go further Your workflow ©DxO Labs 2007 - 2 - All rights reserved DxO Optics Pro V4.5 Reference Manual Chapter 8 22 DxO Optics Pro Menus Chapter 9 28 Using Auto, Guided and Expert modes Chapter 10 31 Generic Tools Chapter 11 34 DxO Optics Tools Chapter 12 40 Sharpness Tools Chapter 13 43 DxO Noise Tools Chapter 14 45 White Balance and Exposure Chapter 15 49 DxO Color Tools Chapter 16 55 DxO Lighting Tools Chapter 17 58 Geometry Tools Chapter 18 62 Stacking, ranking and Output Formats Chapter 19 67 DxO Optics Pro for Adobe ® Photoshop™ Chapter 20 68 DxO Optics Pro for Adobe ® Lightroom™ Copyrights, Trademarks and Registered marks are properties of their respective owners, which may include, but are not limited to, Nikon, Canon, Kodak, Fuji, Sony and others.
    [Show full text]
  • Automatic Detection and Correction of Purple Fringing Using the Gradient Information and Desaturation
    16th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO 2008), Lausanne, Switzerland, August 25-29, 2008, copyright by EURASIP AUTOMATIC DETECTION AND CORRECTION OF PURPLE FRINGING USING THE GRADIENT INFORMATION AND DESATURATION Baek-Kyu Kim* and Rae-Hong Park*, ** *Department of Electronic Engineering, Sogang University **Interdisciplinary Program of Integrated Biotechnology, Sogang University C.P.O. Box 1142, Seoul 100-611, Korea phone: + (822) 705-8463, fax: + (822) 706-4216, email: {ohn109, rhpark}@sogang.ac.kr web: http://eevision1.sogang.ac.kr ABSTRACT An existing method (Kang’s method) [6] detects and corrects the color artifacts that have the purple color tone, which are called pur- This paper proposes a method to automatically detect and correct ple fringing. Unfortunately, Kang’s method has a weakness that it purple fringing that is one of the color artifacts due to characteris- may detect and correct even intact pixels because it uses only two tics of charge coupled device sensors in a digital camera. The pro- properties: purple fringed pixels appear near bright regions with posed method consists of two steps. In the first step, we detect pur- color characteristic. In this paper, we aim to detect purple fringe ple fringed regions that satisfy specific properties: hue characteris- artifacts more accurately than Kang’s method [6] by expanding the tics around highlight regions with large gradient magnitudes. In color range for accurate detection of purple fringing using the gradi- the second step, color correction of the purple fringed regions is ent magnitude information of an image. made by desaturating the pixels in the detected regions. The pro- The rest of the paper is organized as follows.
    [Show full text]
  • Computer Vision CS 776 Fall 2018
    Computer Vision CS 776 Fall 2018 Cameras & Photogrammetry 2 Prof. Alex Berg (Slide credits to many folks on individual slides) Cameras & Photogrammetry 2 Camera Obscura • Basic principle known to Mozi (470-390 BCE), Aristotle (384-322 BCE) • Drawing aid for artists: described by Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519) Gemma Frisius, 1558 Source: A. Efros Abelardo Morell From Grand Images Through a Tiny Opening, Photo District News, February 2005 Camera Obscura Image of Manhattan View Looking South in Large Room, 1996 http://www.abelardomorell.net/camera_obscura1.html Accidental pinhole cameras A. Torralba and W. Freeman, Accidental Pinhole and Pinspeck Cameras, CVPR 2012 Home-made pinhole camera Slide by A. Efros http://www.debevec.org/Pinhole/ Shrinking the aperture Why not make the aperture as small as possible? • Less light gets through • Diffraction effects… Slide by Steve Seitz Shrinking the aperture Adding a lens A lens focuses light onto the film • Thin lens model: – Rays passing through the center are not deviated (pinhole projection model still holds) Slide by Steve Seitz Adding a lens focal point f A lens focuses light onto the film • Thin lens model: – Rays passing through the center are not deviated (pinhole projection model still holds) – All parallel rays converge to one point on a plane located at the focal length f Slide by Steve Seitz Adding a lens “circle of confusion” A lens focuses light onto the film • There is a specific distance at which objects are “in focus” – other points project to a “circle of confusion” in the image
    [Show full text]
  • Automatic Correction of Chromatic Aberration Using Photoacute Studio
    International Journal of Information Research and Review, November, 2016 International Journal of Information Research and Review Vol. 03, Issue, 11, pp. 3103-3113, November, 2016 Research Article AUTOMATIC CORRECTION OF CHROMATIC ABERRATION USING PHOTOACUTE STUDIO *Dr. Mohammed Tawfik Abdelfattah Department of News Sector-Graphics, Graphic Designer, Egyptian Television, Egypt ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT In a digital camera, the causes of color artifacts are due to the characteristics of an image sensor or an Article History: optical device. Chromatic aberration is one of the color artifacts. Because chromatic aberration is Received 18th August, 2016 unpleasant to the eye, users are likely to eliminate or correct the color fringed pixels. At present, most Received in revised form users select the regions which contain the color fringed pixels, and correct them using software such as 22nd September, 2016 th Adobe® PhotoShop. Other applications such as PTLens® use lookup table of precomputed parameters Accepted 14 October, 2016 to reduce the artifacts. This study aims to correct the effects of Chromatic Aberration automatically Published online November, 30th 2016 and overcome the limitations of optics manufacturing technology through the use of Almalance’s Keywords: PhotoAcute Studio, which corrects this aberration automatically, minimizing the circle of confusion, with no need of manual adjustments of any parameters. The study thus concluded that, the Almalence Almalance’s PhotoAcute Studio PhotoAcute studio was able to achieve high quality images without any annoying chromatic aberration Automatic Chromatic Aberration (red and green fringing) and overcame the limitations of the optics manufacturing technology. Red Fringing Green Fringing Axial Chromatic Aberration (ACA) Lateral Chromatic Aberration (LCA) Paraxial Optics Achromatic Apochromatic Doublets.
    [Show full text]
  • Photography Through the Microscope David Linstead Phd • an Introduction to the Many Ways to Take Pleasing Digital Photographs Through Your Microscope
    Photography through the Microscope David Linstead PhD • An introduction to the many ways to take pleasing digital photographs through your microscope. • Concentrating on practical, simple, low cost solutions, but mindful of some of the technical problems that can beset the beginner. • Some of the solutions offered will be available as demonstrations. Photography through the Microscope • The first considerations to make when planning to take photographs through the microscope are: – What type of microscope is available, monocular, binocular or trinocular? – Is it the modern ‘infinity corrected’ type or the older finite tube length type? – What is its source of illumination? – What type of camera is available, digital compact or digital SLR (single lens reflex) – Some types of camera, e.g. digital compacts with large zooms greater than about X6 are simply unuseable through the microscope. Photography through the Microscope • What type of microscope do you have ? Photo tube Trinocular head Binocular Microscope Trinocular microscope Photography through the Microscope • For the best photographic results a trinocular head is desirable, but by no means essential. • Desirable features are: – A dedicated place where a camera can be semi-permanently attached. – The subject can be located and the photograph composed through the eyepieces, and then the light path switched to the camera. – Some trinocular heads have a permanent light split between the eyepieces and the phototube allowing immediate capture of the image seen in the eyepieces. – It is usually possible to make the image at the camera ‘parfocal’ with the image at the eyepieces. That is if the image is in correct focus visually it will be correctly focused at the camera sensor.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,339.462 B2 Stec Et Al
    US0083394.62B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,339.462 B2 Stec et al. (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 25, 2012 (54) METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR 6,881,718 B1 4/2005 FitzGerald et al. ADDRESSING CHROMATIC ABBERATIONS 7,003,139 B2 2/2006 Endrikhovski et al. 7,046,924 B2 5/2006 Miller et al. ANDPURPLE FRINGING 7,142,238 B1 * 1 1/2006 Sawada et al. ................ 348,252 7,206,022 B2 4/2007 Miller et al. (75) Inventors: Piotr Stec, Galway (IE); Larry Murray, 7,218,793 B2 5/2007 Perlmutter et al. Galway (IE); Alexandru Drimbarean, 7,233,684 B2 6/2007 Fedorovskaya et al. Galway (IE) 7,243,945 B2 7/2007 Breed et al. 7.245,319 B1* 7/2007 Enomoto ................... 348.222.1 (73) Assignee: DigitalOptics Corporation Europe (Continued) Limited, Galway (IE) FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this EP 22.93582 A2 3, 2011 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 (Continued) U.S.C. 154(b) by 463 days. (21) Appl. No.: 12/360,665 OTHER PUBLICATIONS PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report (22) Filed: Jan. 27, 2009 and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the O O Declaration, for PCT Application No. PCT/EP2009/050967, mailed (65) Prior Publication Data on Oct. 16, 2009, 12 pages. US 2009/O189997 A1 Jul. 30, 2009 (Continued) Relatede U.S. Applicationpplication DatUata Primary Examiner — Albert Cutler (60) Provisional application No. 61/023,946, filed on Jan. (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — Andrew V.
    [Show full text]
  • Equipment Review: Orion 80Mm ED Refractor by Lawrence Carlino
    Volume 5 Issue 6 Late Fall / Winter November / December 2003 Equipment Review: Orion 80mm ED Refractor by Lawrence Carlino Amateur astronomers have long realized the virtues of the classic refracting telescope - an instrument capable of superb definition, high-contrast imaging, and exceptional versatility. With no central obstruc- tion in the optical path, the refractor has the potential of yielding the finest definition of any telescope type - if it were not for the demons of chromatic aberration. The classic 2-element Fraunhofer objective lens can reduce this spurious color to manageable levels, but only in cumbersome long focal ratios of f/15 or above. The use of special ED (extra low dispersion) glass or calcium fluorite in one of the lens ele- ments, or a three or four-element design, solves the problem and allows much more convenient focal ra- tios. But the cost of such a system ranges from pricey to prohibitive, even in the smaller apertures. Happily, this situation may have changed with the introduction of Orion's new 80mm ED refractor tube assembly. Utilizing one element crafted from FPL-53 fluorite glass, the scope sports a clear aperture of 80mm and a focal ratio of f/7.5, yielding a focal length of 600mm. Made by Synta in China and imported by Orion, this instrument is by far the lowest -priced apochromatic (false-color-free) refractor available in its aperture range. At $429 + shipping, the ED 80 comes with a 2-inch Crayford focuser , 1.25" adapter, a Table Of Contents nicely finished dark gray metallic aluminum tube, a detachable dew cap, plastic dust cap, and a mounting block with 1/4-20 female threads for attachment to a variety of mounts and tripods.
    [Show full text]