DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Fiscal Year Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Fiscal Year Report ANNUAL FISCAL YEAR REPORT OCTOBER 2004 TO SEPTEMBER 2005 Moldova Local Government Reform Project THE URBAN INSTITUTE USAID's Moldova Local Government Reform Project EEU-I-00-99-00015-00, Task Order No. 806 (06901-007) MOLDOVA LOCAL GOVERNMENT REFORM PROJECT (LGRP) ANNUAL FISCAL YEAR REPORT OCTOBER 2004 TO SEPTEMBER 2005 Prepared for Prepared by The Urban Institute Moldova Local Government Reform Project United States Agency for International Development Contract No. EEU-I-00-99-00015-00, Task Order No.806 THE URBAN INSTITUTE 2100 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20037 (202) 833-7200 October 2006 www.urban.org UI Project 06901-007 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF PROJECT ACCOMPLISHMENTS................................................1 II. MAJOR ACTIVITIES..................................................................................................................................3 III. LIST OF DOCUMENTS BY PROGRAM COMPONENT.........................................................................18 ANNEXES Annex A–Fiscal Decentralization Annex B–Democracy and Governance Annex C–Municipal Services/Demonstration Projects MOLDOVA LOCAL GOVERNMENT REFORM PROJECT ANNUAL FISCAL YEAR REPORT OCTOBER 2004 TO SEPTEMBER 2005 I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF PROJECT ACCOMPLISHMENTS This report covers 12 months⎯October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2005 or Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 of the Moldova Local Government Reform Project (LGRP). Part I provides the introduction to the report and describes its organization. Part II describes major activities undertaken during the period covered by this report. Part III lists the work products for FY2005, which can be found in the annexes to this report. There are three annexes to the FY2005 LGRP report: Fiscal Decentralization, Democracy and Governance, and Municipal Services/Demonstration Projects. Task Order No.: EEU-I-00-99-00015-00, TO No. 806 Date of Issuance: February 1, 2000 Task Order Description: The Moldova LGRP is implementing a technical assistance program over a five-year period to assist all levels of government in the Republic of Moldova in shaping and realizing its agenda for local government reform. The principal focus of LGRP is on “governments of the first level” (i.e., cities and towns) and to a lesser extent villages. This includes improving local government autonomy (including fiscal decentralization and improved management) and strengthening civil society organizations (CSOs) role in democratic local governance. Increased citizen participation in decision-making in the target cities will indicate that the cities have enough fiscal decentralization to make independent decisions about their budgets and strategic plans, elected officials are aware of the importance of citizen participation, and citizens believe that their participation is important, and have been mobilized to play a role in their local government. Amount obligated under Task Order: $ 9,099,793 (As of 9/30/2004) Total potential Task Order amount: $ 11,348,206 Dollars expended to date, including accruals: $ 6,477,022 (As of 9/30/2005) Project results as of September 30, 2005 are shown in Table 1. Moldova 2 Local Government Reform Project Table I-1 Project Indicators1 Fiscal Year Indicator Definition and Unit of Baseline Data Plan Actual Performance Indicator 2006 Measurement Year Value 2005 2005 Target Actual Strategic Objective: 2.3: Democratic institutions more effective, responsive and accountable 1. Indicator: Citizen Definition: Citizens' participation in decision-making can be demonstrated through public hearings on the local budget and public hearings on municipal service decisions or strategic planning. This participation in decision- 2 making in partner local indicator counts the number of partner local governments that can demonstrate citizen governments in: participation through: Unit: Number (cumulative) a) A minimum of 1 public hearing on a) Budget process 2004 37 45 65 85 the local budget b) Decisions about b) A minimum of 1 public hearing on municipal services or municipal service decisions and/or 2004 82 85 111 137 strategic planning strategic planning IR 2.3.1: Local government autonomy strengthened 2. Indicator: Community Definition: Partner local governments strategic plans officially that have officially adopted a strategic adopted by action of the plan as confirmed by an officially 2004 57 72 80 98 council after a formal registered decision of the legislative public hearing body Unit: Number (cumulative) 3. Indicator: Partner Definition: Partner local governments communities, in which that have increased financial financial management management capacity by 2004 55 70 79 99 capacity is increased implementing office automation and through office automation receiving computer training Unit: Number (cumulative) 4. Indicator: Definition: Households in partner local Households receiving communities receiving higher quality new or improved public and more reliable services through 2004 67,540 70,000 83,874 80,000 services in partner local more transparent processes government communities Unit: Number per year 5. Indicator: Definition: Demonstration projects Demonstration projects implemented that achieve an objective competitively selected in a community strategic plan and and implemented result in improvement of strategically important services and/or facilities, and 2004 0 40 42 75 enhancement of the sustainability of community strategic planning in communities across Moldova Unit: Number per year 1 LGRP results as of September 30, 2005. 2 The total number of partner local governments is 110. The total number of local governments in Moldova is 903. Annual Fiscal Year Report - October 2004 to September 2005 3 II. MAJOR ACTIVITIES Task #1 – Assist in Establishing Legislation and Implementing Regulations towards Decentralization Since political conditions in Moldova were not conducive to deploying policy research aimed at advancing legislative reform towards decentralization, LGRP focused its attention and resources on preparing local governments to apply their capacity within the current restrictive legal framework. During the reporting period, LGRP monitored the political situation and conducted and/or supported actions and research related to improving the policy and legislative framework for local governance. In this context, a local (CCN) legal expert completed research aimed at analyzing the impact on local governments, in general, and their financial sustainability, in particular, of the proposed administrative regulations (the so-called “guillotine law”) to the current legislation related to small business operation. Report findings reveal that the domestic legislation that shapes the regulatory framework for local business is quite confusing and many legal provisions can be easily treated in different ways due to their unclear meaning. In addition, there is room for discretionary actions taken by local authorities in issuing permits, licenses, and other kinds of legal documents. The expert came to the conclusion that the intention to rationalize all by-laws related to small businesses will have a positive impact, as long as the reformers do not fall into a centralized “normative trap.” LGRP believes legal opinion can serve as a basis for promoting transparency and predictability. New laws and regulations should be consistent with the basic principles of a society based on citizen participation, government accountability, and rule of law. In FY2005, LGRP produced a monitoring report of recently passed governmental directives on strategic planning, which analyzed presidential decrees and governmental decisions regarding the National Program of Local Communities in Moldova of the Year 2005. The report outlines that international financial institutions (World Bank and International Monetary Fund) require that the National Strategy of Economic Growth and Poverty Alleviation should be complemented by a clear long-term action plan that specifies jurisdictional needs. Based on this report, the President passed a decree that encourages each community in Moldova to prepare a community strategic plan for the period 2005-2015. At the core of the presidential decree is a directive to all Moldovan communities calling for a centralized framework/approach to community planning. Tough time limits (two to three weeks) for completion of the community plans and a lack of transparency and citizen participation during the preparation process significantly undermined the quality of the community plans. However, many LGRP partner communities used working groups (with LGRP assistance) consisting of community members to draft projections for the period 2005 to 2015, which were eventually included in their community strategic plans. Moldova 4 Local Government Reform Project Task #2 – Build the Capacity of Municipal Officials to Implement Reforms and Improve Delivery of Services A. Component 1: Fiscal Decentralization 1. Quarterly LGRP Financial Applications Users’ group Meetings An important pillar in strengthening the local governments’ own capacities for better financial management has become Quarterly Financial Applications Users’ group (FAUG) meetings, organized by LGRP’s Fiscal Improvements (FI) team. During FY05, three major features were added to these meetings: • Significant increase in the number of participants attending the quarterly FAUG meetings, as a result of the addition of 20 new LGRP partners, as well as 30 existing LGRP partners that had not previously benefited from the full range of LGRP
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Clientelismul Politic În Moldova Studiu De Caz: Programul Drumuri Bune Pentru Moldova
    CLIENTELISMUL POLITIC ÎN MOLDOVA STUDIU DE CAZ: PROGRAMUL DRUMURI BUNE PENTRU MOLDOVA Clientelismul politic în Moldova PARTEA I. DRUMURI BUNE PENTRU MOLDOVA – ANALIZA OPORTUNITĂȚII ȘI EFICIENȚEI PROIECTULUI Autor: Oleg Tofilat, Watchdog PARTEA A II A. ELEMENTE DE CLIENTELISM POLITIC ÎN PROGRAMUL ”DRUMURI BUNE PENTRU MOLDOVA” Autor: Valeriu Pașa, Watchdog Foto copertă: Shane Rounce / Unsplash Proiect implementat de Expert Forum și finanțat de Programul Statul de Drept Europa de Sud-Est al Fundației Konrad Adenauer. www.kas.de/rlpsee Opiniile exprimate în această publicație aparțin autorilor și nu reprezintă neapărat puncte de vedere ale Fundației Konrad Adenauer, Programul Statul de Drept Europa de Sud-Est. 2 Clientelismul politic în Moldova PARTEA I Infrastructura drumurilor: cadrul normativ și strategiile naționale ............................................ 4 Implementarea strategiilor de infrastructură rutieră .................................................................... 8 Planificare și definire a priorităților .............................................................................................. 8 Finanțare externă ............................................................................................................................ 8 Finanțare internă (Fondul Rutier) .................................................................................................. 8 Executarea lucrărilor de construcție și reabilitare a drumurilor ........................................... 10 “Drumuri bune pentru Moldova” –
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study for Railway Infrastructure Need Assessment in Moldova – Environmental and Social Appraisal Task 4
    Moldovan Railway Restructuring project 24/11/2017 FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR RAILWAY INFRASTRUCTURE NEED ASSESSMENT IN MOLDOVA – ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL APPRAISAL TASK 4 REF: EME – FR01T16G53-11 MOLDOVAN RAILWAY RESTRUCTURING PROJECT FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR RAILWAY INFRASTRUCTURE NEED ASSESSMENT IN MOLDOVA – ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL APPRAISAL TASK 4 FICHE D’IDENTIFICATION Client CFM (Calea Ferata Din Moldova) Project Moldovan Railway Restructuring project Feasibility study for Railway infrastructure need assessment in Study Moldova – Environmental and Social Appraisal Task 4 Document Environmental and Social Appraisal Date 24/11/2017 Nom du fichier Feasibility study Moldova - Inception report - Frame Reference CFM Feasibility Study ToR - ENG Référence EME – FR01T16G53-11 Confidentiality Yes Language English Number of pages 128 APPROVAL Version Name Position Date Visa Modifications Environmental KRAJCOVIC Roman 24/11/2017 expert 6 GAUDRY Alain Key expert 24/11/2017 CUDENNEC Hervé EME Region 24/11/2017 SYSTRA • société anonyme à directoire et conseil de surveillance CS 41594 • 72,rue Henry Farman • 75513 Paris Cedex 15 • France | Tel +33 1 40 16 61 00 • Fax +33 1 40 16 61 04 Capital social 27 283 102 Euros | RCS Paris 387 949 530 | APE 7112B | TVA intra FR19387949530 4. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS The Environmental and Social Impact Assessment process is mainly based on and guided by the following documents: The Moldovan legislation on the Environmental Impact Assessment (Law No. 86 on Environmental Impact Assessment of May 29, 2014); Performance Requirements
    [Show full text]
  • Pottery Found at the Horodca Mică And
    32 PLURAL Vol. 5, nr. 2, 2017 Pottery found at the Horodca Mică and Ulmu Iron Age settlements – results of archaeoceramological analysis Malgorzata DASZKIEWICZ, Michael MEYER, Octavian MUNTEANU, Vasile IARMULSCHI Abstract One of the major questions of the Pre-Roman Iron Age settlements in the East part of the Carpathians Region is the relationship between the Getic cul- ture and the Poieneşti-Lukaşevka culture. There are any connections between the settlers of both cultures, or are we dealing with a demolition of the settle- ments and a complete resettlement by “immigrants” from the north part of Europe? The “getics” pottery in the settlements of the Poieneşti-Lukaşevka culture speaks against a radical discontinuity, the extensive restructuring of the settlement system, the new burial grounds and ceramic molds are used for a far-reaching resettlement. The following article assumes that the destruction of settlements and new immigration can be seen in a clearly evident change in ceramic technology and the associated supply of raw materials. It is assumed that extensive continuities in the production of ceramics require an undisturbed knowledge transfer between the actors, which cannot be the case in a complete new settlement. In particular, this can be traced back to archaeometric analyzes of ceramics, whereby local or non-local sound supply, leaning, sound processing and burning techniques have meaning. For this reason, ceramics of the two cul- tures of two neighboring settlements – Ulmu (Ialoveni District, Republic of Moldva – Poieneşti-Lukaşevka culture) and Horodca Mică (Hânceşti district, Republic of Moldova, Getic culture) – were examined for these parameters. Archaeoceramology is a narrow specialist branch of archaeometry dealing with multiple aspects of historical pottery analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Raionul Orhei
    FORMULARUL F3.5 GRAFIC DE EXECUTARE A LUCRĂRILOR Lucrări de întreținere periodică a drumurilor publice locale, comunale și străzi (în limita localităților) amplasate teritorial în raioanele Orhei, Telenesti. Nr. Grupa de obiecte/denumirea obiectului Anul 2020 d/o Luna VII VIII VIII IX X XI Raionul Orhei 1 com. Berezlogi, s. Berezlogi 2 com. Berezlogi, s. Hijdieni 3 com. Biesti, s. Biesti 4 com. Chiperceni, s. Chiperceni 5 com. Chiperceni, s. Voronet 6 com. Ciocilteni, s. Ciocilteni 7 com. Ciocilteni, s. Clisova Noua 8 com. Crihana, s. Cucuruzenii de Sus 9 com. Cucuruzeni, s. Cucuruzeni 10 com. Donici, s. Donici 11 com. Donici, s. Camencea 12 com. Ghetlova, s. Ghetlova 13 com. Ghetlova, s. Hulboaca 14 com. Ghetlova, s. Noroceni 15 com. Ivancea, s. Ivancea 16 com. Jora de Mijloc, s. Jora de Mijloc 17 com. Malaiesti,s. Malaiesti 18 com. Mirzesti, s. Mirzesti 19 com. Morozeni, s. Morozeni 20 com. Morozeni, s. Brenova 21 com. Pelivan, s. Pelivan 22 com. Pelivan, s. Cismea 23 com. Piatra, s. Jeloboc 24 com. Pohrebeni, s. Pohrebeni 25 com. Pohrebeni, s. Sercani 26 com. Putintei, s. Putintei 27 com. Putintei, s. Viprova 28 com. Putintei, s. Discova 29 com. Seliste, s. Seliste 30 com. Step - Soci, s. Step - Soci 31 com. Trebujeni, s. Trebujeni 32 com. Vatici, s. Tabara 33 com. Zorile, s. Zorile 34 com. Zorile, s. Inculet 35 com. Zorile, s. Ocnita - Tarani 36 or. Orhei 37 s. Bolohan 38 s. Braviceni 39 s. Bulaesti 40 s. Clisova 41 s. Isacova 42 s. Mitoc 43 s. Neculaieuca 44 s. Peresecina 45 s.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report for Fy 2012
    ANNUAL REPORT FOR FY 2012 Rule of Law Institutional Strengthening Program (ROLISP) USAID Contract No. AID-117-C-12-00002 Prepared by: Frederick G. Yeager COP Activity Office: USAID/Moldova COR: Ina Pislaru, September 30, 2012 Submitted October 15, 2012 by: Frederick G. Yeager, Chief of Party Checchi and Company Consulting, Inc. ROLISP Program 27 Armenesca Street 1 Chisinau, Moldova Contents FY 2012 ANNUAL REPORT ON EXPECTED RESUTS AND ACTIVITIES .............................................. 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 8 OBJECTIVE 1: ENHANCE THE EFFECTIVENESS, TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY OF THE MOLDOVAN JUDICIARY THROUGH STRENGTHENING THE CAPACITY OF THE SCM AND THE DJA .......................................... 8 OBJECTIVE 2: STRENGTHEN THE INSTITUTIONAL AND OPERATIONAL CAPACITY OF THE NIJ ........................... 11 • Modernize CLE Training Content ..................................................................................................... 13 • Develop guidelines for interpreting the ICMS statistical data .......................................................... 13 OBJECTIVE 3: INCREASE THE CAPACITY OF CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS TO MONITOR AND ADVOCATE FOR JUSTICE SECTOR REFORMS AND IMPROVE PUBLIC LEGAL AWARENESS THUS INCREASING ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN MOLDOVA ...................................................................................................................................... 14 PUBLIC-PRIVATE
    [Show full text]
  • According to National Human Development Report 2009/2010 Done by UNDP the Year 2009 Has Seen a Steep Economic Decline with Corresponding Effects on Per Capita GDP
    MCA 2009 Annual Report Table of Content 1. Country Context 2009……………………………………………………………………………………………………….1 2. MCA organizational development…………………………………………………………………………………….4 3. MCA programs & activities……………………………………………………………………………………………….6 4. Financial report………………………………………………………………………………………………………………36 1. COUNTRY CONTEXT 2009 Among the major challenges faced by Moldova in 2009 were the economic and political crises, intensified since April with the failure of the newly elected Parliamentarian factions to reach consensus and elect a President. This situation led to the repeated Parliamentary elections in July 2009, the political tensions deepening the economic crisis within the country to which a response has yet to be formalized. The political crisis and associated budget expenditures represent a further threat to the sharply declining economy, blocking the proper implementation of crisis management strategies to support the private sector and vulnerable groups. Political instability and its negative impact on potential foreign investors, who are looking for less risky and less politically biased capital investments, will further harm the economy. In 2009 the local communities in Moldova were victims of more than just the global financial crisis and domestic economic downturn. The political crisis increased social stress and undermined the institutional confidence and stability necessary for the local public administrations to perform their duties. A sociological survey conducted by Expert-Group NGO has shown that in June 2009 more people were afraid of domestic political turmoil rather than of the financial crisis itself. The sudden introduction in April 2009 of the visa regime with Romania left many Moldovan- Romanian joint ventures dysfunctional because engineers and managers from Romania could not get their visas in order to supervise the production process.
    [Show full text]
  • Programul Electoral Al Candidatului Pentru Funcţia De Guvernator Al Găgăuziei IRINA VLAH
    Alegerile Guvernatorului Găgăuziei din 30 iunie 2019 Programul electoral al candidatului pentru funcţia de Guvernator al Găgăuziei IRINA VLAH Implementarea programului regional "Acasă în Găgăuzia" Programul vizează întoarcerea şi acomodarea compatrioţilor în UTA Găgăuzia. Participanţii la program şi membrii familiilor acestora vor primi garanţii din partea autorităţilor regionale, sprijin financiar şi beneficii sociale: • Acordarea subvenţiilor în valoare de 40,000 de lei pentru fiecare familie care se întoarce la reşedinţa permanentă în Găgăuzia. • Furnizarea de stimulente pentru ca aceste familii să plătească impozite şi taxe locale. • Alocarea terenurilor pentru construirea şi dezvoltarea afacerilor proprii acestor familii în condiţii preferenţiale. • Asigurarea participării prioritare a familiilor care revin în Patria în programele de sprijin pentru întreprinderile mici şi mijlocii. • Acorda sprijinului familiilor în procesul de acomodare. Dezvoltarea industrială a regiunii • Crearea a 5,000 locuri de muncă noi, oferirea unui pachet social tuturor deţinătorilor a noilor locuri de muncă din sectorul real al economiei. • Creşterea salariului mediu în regiune la 10,000 lei. • Atragerea investiţiilor în volum anual de 100 de milioane de lei în zone economice libere – Comrat, Ceadîr-Lunga şi Vulcăneşti. • Deschiderea unui aeroport modern în Ceadîr-Lunga, care poate deservi zboruri internaţionale de mărfuri şi pasageri. • Construirea unei centrale electrice moderne în Vulcăneşti, care va asigura necesarul de energie electrică pentru regiune. • Acordarea subvenţiilor pentru toţi agenţii economici în valoare de 3,000 lei pentru fiecare nou loc de muncă creat. • Acordarea subvenţiilor pentru sprijinirea întreprinderilor mici şi mijlocii: până la 400 mii lei pentru fiecare solicitant. Volumul anual al granturilor va fi de 20 milioane de lei. alegeri.md Programul electoral al Irinei Vlah • Volumul fondului de sprijin pentru afaceri va fi majorat la 100 milioane de lei în 2023.
    [Show full text]
  • Lista Bibliotecilor Publice Din Raionul Orhei La 01.01.2020 Nr. D/R Primăria
    Lista Bibliotecilor Publice din Raionul Orhei la 01.01.2020 Nr. de telefon din Primăria Anul Numele, Nr. d/r Denumirea bibliotecii Adresa, site, blog e-mail bibliotecă/ mobil fondării prenumele (bibliotecar) Biblioteca Publică Raională Orhei, bd.M.Eminescu, 4 Consiliul „Alexandru Donici” E-mail:[email protected] , 023523684/ 1 1901 Stepanida Ţugui Raional www.facebook.com./bprorhei 067292404 http://biblioteca-donici.org BibliotecaPublică Orhei, str. Renaşterii Naţionale, 16 Consiliul 2 Raională„A.Donici”. Filiala E-mail: 1946 Lucia Brehoi 023521360 Raional pentru copii „I. Creangă” [email protected] Biblioteca Publică Orhei, str. Unirii, 142 Consiliul 3 Raională”A.Donici”. Filiala E- ail:[email protected] 1967 Eugenia Arseni 023523826 Raional „Bucuria” BibliotecaPublică Raională Consiliul Orhei, str. Stejarilor, 1 4 „A.Donici”. Filiala 1979 Ala Gheluţă 067449604 Raional E-mail: [email protected] „Lupoaica” Consiliul Biblioteca Publică Raională Orhei, str. Negruzzi, 117 5 1973 Savin Alina 023529574 Raional „A.Donici” . Filiala „Nordic” E-mail:[email protected] Biblioteca Publică Raională Orhei, str. 31 August, 75 Consiliul Moscovciuc 6 „A.Donici”. Filiala „Slobozia E-mail: 1948 023530681 Raional Ludmila Doamnei” [email protected] 7 Biblioteca Publică Berezlogi 1947 Ţurcan Elena 069931875 Berezlogi Comunală Berezlogi E-mail: [email protected] 8 Biblioteca Publică Sătească 1954 Rodica Hîrcîială 023562141 Hîjdieni Hîjdieni E-mail: bibliotecahî[email protected] Biblioteca Publică
    [Show full text]
  • AGROFOR International Journal
    AGROFOR International Journal PUBLISHER University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Agriculture Vuka Karadzica 30, 71123 East Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina Telephone/fax: +387 57 340 401; +387 57 342 701 Web: www.agrofor.rs.ba; Email: [email protected] EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Vesna MILIC (BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA) MANAGING EDITORS Dusan KOVACEVIC (SERBIA); Sinisa BERJAN (BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA); Noureddin DRIOUECH (ITALY) EDITORIAL BOARD Dieter TRAUTZ (GERMANY); Hamid El BILALI (ITALY); William H. MEYERS (USA); Milic CUROVIC (MONTENEGRO); Tatjana PANDUREVIC (BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA); Alexey LUKIN (RUSSIA); Machito MIHARA (JAPAN); Abdulvahed KHALEDI DARVISHAN (IRAN); Viorel ION (ROMANIA); Novo PRZULJ (BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA); Steve QUARRIE (UNITED KINGDOM); Hiromu OKAZAWA (JAPAN); Snezana JANKOVIC (SERBIA); Naser SABAGHNIA (IRAN); Sasa ORLOVIC (SERBIA); Sanja RADONJIC (MONTENEGRO); Junaid Alam MEMON (PAKISTAN); Vlado KOVACEVIC (CROATIA); Marko GUTALJ (BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA); Dragan MILATOVIC (SERBIA); Pandi ZDRULI (ITALY); Zoran JOVOVIC (MONTENEGRO); Vojislav TRKULJA (BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA); Zoran NJEGOVAN (SERBIA); Adriano CIANI (ITALY); Aleksandra DESPOTOVIC (MONTENEGRO); Igor DJURDJIC (BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA); Stefan BOJIC (BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA); Julijana TRIFKOVIC (BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA) TECHNICAL EDITORS Milan JUGOVIC (BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA) Luka FILIPOVIC (MONTENEGRO) Frequency: 3 times per year Number of copies: 300 ISSN 2490-3434 (Printed) ISSN 2490-3442 (Online) CONTENT BIOMASS PRODUCTION OF MORINGA (Moringa oleifera L.) AT VARIOUS
    [Show full text]
  • Planul De Gestionare a Bazinului Hidrografic Al Râului Botna
    PLANUL DE GESTIONARE a bazinului hidrografic al râului Botna Ciclul I 2021-2027 Autori: Dr. Bejan Iurie Dr. Bacal Petru Chișinău – 2020 Dr. Boboc Nicolae Viorica Angheluţa Pavel Ţîţu Liliana Stratan Boris Iurciuc Planul de gestionare al Bazinului Hidrografic Botna CUPRINS Abrevieri ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 Introducere ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Caracteristica generală a bazinului hidrografic Botna .................................................................................. 5 Condițiile climatice .................................................................................................................................... 6 Structura geologică și condițiile hidrogeologice ....................................................................................... 9 Topografia ............................................................................................................................................... 12 Apele de suprafață .................................................................................................................................. 14 Solurile .................................................................................................................................................... 17 Ecosistemele naturale ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GAGAUZIA (SFM) (IDSI) „Viitorul” Initiative (LGI-OSI) (Gagauz-Yeri)
    Th is Guide has been published with the fi nancial support of the Soros Foundation Moldova and Open Society Institute Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative (LGI/OSI). Institute for Open Society Institute Autonomous Soros Foundation Development and Local Government and Territorial Unit Moldova Social Initiatives Public Service Reform GAGAUZIA (SFM) (IDSI) „Viitorul” Initiative (LGI-OSI) (Gagauz-Yeri) Th e content of this document lies under sole responsibility of the Institute for Development and Social Initiatives “Viitorul” and ATU Gagauzia. It does not refl ect under any circumstances the viewpoint of the Soros Foundation Moldova and Open Society Institute Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative (LGI/OSI). Th e authors would like to express their sincerest gratitude to the authorities of the ATU Gagauzia, in particular to Mr. Mihail Formuzal, Governor of ATU Gagauzia and Mr. Vitalii Kiurkchu, Head of General department of economic development, trade, services and external economic aff airs of Gagauzia. Coordinator: Liubomir Chiriac, IDSI Viitorul Issued by: Igor Munteanu, IDSI Viitorul Vlad Catlabuga, IDSI Viitorul Mihail Shalvir, IDSI Viitorul Veaceslav Ionita, IDSI Viitorul Liubomir Chiriac Jr, Princeton University, USA Published under the project: “Developing Economies Locally through Action and Alliance (DELTA) Gagauzia” initiated by LGI/OSI in cooperation with Gagauz authorities, co-sponsored by the Soros Foundation Moldova and implemented by the IDSI “Viitorul” CONTENT FOREWORD ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lista Contribuabililor Cu Sume Plătite În Plus Anulate Prin Prescripție În Anul 2021
    Lista contribuabililor cu sume plătite în plus anulate prin prescripție în anul 2021 № Cod fiscal Denumirea contribuabilului Suma 1 100022463 PETCOGLO I.A CIOC-MAIDAN 1,09 2 1001131 SPERANTA GANU GT 3,00 3 100129469 UTAN I.I.-DEZGHINJEA GT 99,00 4 100136469 UZUN P.N.-DEZGHINJEA GT 213,00 5 100144460 IVAN ORMANJI CAB.AVOC. 50,00 6 100207464 IRINA CAPACLI CAB.AVOC. 71,17 7 100251461 CENTRUL DE CULT.FENIX OO 0,40 8 100259467 CENTRUL DE INIT.CIVICE OO 333,07 9 1002600000054 PROBOTRANS S.R.L. 21,98 10 1002600000113 AGROMODVITA S.R.L. 8,47 11 1002600000135 EVTOVA-COM S.R.L. 213,34 12 1002600000272 I.M. GVG-COM S.R.L. 4 835,02 13 1002600000397 OLIMPIACOS S.R.L. 56,13 14 1002600000412 EURO-NAFTA S.R.L. 32,33 15 1002600000537 MAXIM BADURA I.I. 13,72 16 1002600000548 FPC TIUZ-IVA S.R.L. 0,37 17 1002600000685 FLOREDAN-D S.R.L. 13 431,31 18 1002600000825 BELNAT-COM S.R.L. 516,43 19 1002600000836 SIC-SANDULA I.I. 39,90 20 1002600000881 TIMCAT S.R.L. 49,05 21 1002600000892 I.M. PC CONSULTANTS S.R.L. 1 022,24 22 1002600000906 VOLENDA S.R.L. 8 145,66 23 1002600001017 OFERTA PLUS S.R.L. 2 243,91 24 1002600001198 EMILIANA-PRIM S.R.L. 4 289,64 25 1002600001235 MOLDTRANS-TUR S.R.L. 0,40 26 1002600001408 DIRECTIA SPECIALIZATA IN RESTAURARI S.A. 0,86 27 1002600001420 VECSINA NATALIA I.I. 3 002,25 28 1002600001475 CONDIPROD - COM S.R.L.
    [Show full text]