Country Report: Portugal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Country Report: Portugal Country Report: Portugal 2020 Update Acknowledgements & Methodology This report was written by Inês Carreirinho at the Portuguese Refugee Council (CPR) and was edited by ECRE. The information in this report draws on the experience of CPR staff, gathered inter alia through research, advocacy, legal assistance and reception services, as well as data and information shared by national authorities, civil society organisations and other stakeholders consisting of CRegC, Crescer, CSTAF, DGE, DGEstE, IEFP, IOM, ISS, OTSH, SCML, and SEF. CPR appreciates their contributions. The views expressed in this report are those of the author and do not in any way represent the views of the contributing organisations. The information in this report is up to date as of 31 December 2020, unless otherwise stated. The Asylum Information Database (AIDA) The Asylum Information Database (AIDA) is coordinated by the European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE). It aims to provide up-to date information on asylum practice in 23 countries. This includes 19 EU Member States (AT, BE, BG, CY, DE, ES, FR, GR, HR, HU, IE, IT, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SE, SI) and 4 non-EU countries (Serbia, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom) which is easily accessible to the media, researchers, advocates, legal practitioners and the general public through the dedicated website www.asylumineurope.org. The database also seeks to promote the implementation and transposition of EU asylum legislation reflecting the highest possible standards of protection in line with international refugee and human rights law and based on best practice. This report is part of the Asylum Information Database (AIDA), funded by the European Programme for Integration and Migration (EPIM), a collaborative initiative by the Network of European Foundations, and the European Union’s Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF). The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of ECRE and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of EPIM or the European Commission. Table of Contents Glossary & List of Abbreviations ......................................................................................... 6 Statistics ................................................................................................................................ 9 Overview of the legal framework .........................................................................................12 Overview of the main changes since the previous report update .....................................18 Asylum Procedure ................................................................................................................21 A. General ....................................................................................................................................... 21 1. Flow chart ................................................................................................................................. 21 2. Types of procedures ................................................................................................................ 22 3. List of authorities that intervene in each stage of the procedure ............................................. 22 4. Determining authority ............................................................................................................... 22 5. Short overview of the asylum procedure .................................................................................. 23 B. Access to the procedure and registration .............................................................................. 26 1. Access to the territory and push backs .................................................................................... 26 ......................................................................................................................................................... 26 2. Registration of the asylum application ..................................................................................... 28 C. Procedures ................................................................................................................................ 30 1. Regular procedure ................................................................................................................... 31 2. Dublin ....................................................................................................................................... 42 3. Admissibility procedure ............................................................................................................ 58 4. Border procedure (border and transit zones) ........................................................................... 61 5. Accelerated procedure ............................................................................................................. 67 D. Guarantees for vulnerable groups .......................................................................................... 72 1. Identification ............................................................................................................................. 72 2. Special procedural guarantees ................................................................................................ 79 3. Use of medical reports ............................................................................................................. 81 4. Legal representation of unaccompanied children .................................................................... 82 E. Subsequent applications ......................................................................................................... 84 F. The safe country concepts ...................................................................................................... 86 1. Safe country of origin ............................................................................................................... 86 2. Safe third country ..................................................................................................................... 86 3. First country of asylum ............................................................................................................. 87 G. Information for asylum seekers and access to NGOs and UNHCR ..................................... 88 1. Provision of information on the procedure ............................................................................... 88 2. Access to NGOs and UNHCR.................................................................................................. 91 H. Differential treatment of specific nationalities in the procedure ......................................... 91 Reception Conditions ...........................................................................................................93 A. Access and forms of reception conditions ............................................................................ 94 1. Criteria and restrictions to access reception conditions ........................................................... 94 2. Forms and levels of material reception conditions ................................................................... 97 3. Reduction or withdrawal of reception conditions.................................................................... 100 4. Freedom of movement ........................................................................................................... 102 B. Housing .................................................................................................................................... 104 1. Types of accommodation ....................................................................................................... 104 2. Conditions in reception facilities ............................................................................................. 106 C. Employment and education ................................................................................................... 109 1. Access to the labour market................................................................................................... 109 2. Access to education ............................................................................................................... 114 D. Health care ............................................................................................................................... 117 E. Special reception needs of vulnerable groups .................................................................... 120 F. Information for asylum seekers and access to reception centres .................................... 123 1. Provision of information on reception ..................................................................................... 123 2. Access to reception centres by third parties .......................................................................... 124 G. Differential treatment of specific nationalities in reception ............................................... 124 Detention of Asylum Seekers ............................................................................................ 125 A. General ..................................................................................................................................... 126 B. Legal framework of detention ................................................................................................ 128 1. Grounds for detention ............................................................................................................ 128 2. Alternatives
Recommended publications
  • Non-Exhaustive Overview of European Government Measures Impacting Undocumented Migrants Taken in the Context of COVID-19
    Non-exhaustive overview of European government measures impacting undocumented migrants taken in the context of COVID-19 March-August 2020 This document provides an overview of measures adopted by EU member states and some countries outside the EU in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and foreseen economic downturn, about which PICUM has been informed by its members or has learned of through regular media monitoring.1 Additional information and analysis are provided on regularisation measures taken in Italy and Portugal. Given the limitations of time and capacity, our intention is not to provide an exhaustive presentation, but rather to give a useful summary of measures broadly helpful to people who are undocumented, or who are documented but with insecure status, whatever may have been the authorities’ motivations for their implementation. Please contact [email protected] if you have additional information about any of these measures, or wish to propose a correction. 1 We are grateful to all PICUM members who commented on earlier drafts of this document, and to PICUM trainees Raquel Gomez Lopez and Thomas MacPherson who were instrumental in gathering relevant information and preparing this summary. 1 Contents FOR UNDOCUMENTED MIGRANTS . .3 1. Regularisation �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������3 1.1. Italy . .3 1.2. Portugal . .6 1.3. Other regularisation measures �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������7
    [Show full text]
  • International Standards on Immigration Detention and Non-Custodial Measures
    INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION LAW INFORMATION NOTE INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION LAW UNIT NOVEMBER 2011 IML INFORMATION NOTE ON INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ON IMMIGRATION DETENTION AND NON-CUSTODIAL MEASURES I. Purpose and Scope of the Information Note .................................................................................................. 2 II. General Principles ......................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Definitions: deprivation of liberty vs. restriction of liberty .................................................................................. 2 2. Legality and legitimate grounds for detention ..................................................................................................... 2 3. Necessity, proportionality and prevention from arbitrariness ............................................................................ 3 4. Procedural safeguards .......................................................................................................................................... 3 III. Specific Standards Applicable to Immigration Detention ............................................................................. 4 1. Right to be informed and to communicate with the outside world .................................................................... 4 2. Registration at detention facilities ....................................................................................................................... 4 3. Maximum
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19 and Immigration Detention
    COVID-19 AND IMMIGRATION DETENTION: LESSONS (NOT) LEARNED 1 Page 02 Mapping Covid-19’s impact on immigration detention: why, where, when and what 2 Pages 03-08 Detention policies during the pandemic: unlawful, unclear and unfair 3 Pages 09-10 Alternatives to detention in Covid-19 times: missed opportunity 4 Pages 11-16 Living in detention in time of Covid-19: increased isolation, uncertainties Table ofTable contents and risks ABOUT JRS CREDITS Jesuit Refugee Service (JRS) is an Drafted by Claudia Bonamini international Catholic organisation with a mission to accompany, serve and Copy-edited by Chiara Leone-Ganado advocate for the rights of refugees and Designed by Pablo Rebaque others who are forcibly displaced. Published on February 2021 Project Learning from Covid-19 Pandemic for a more protective Common European Asylum System. The report Covid-19 and immigration detention: Lessons (not) learned presents the findings and the lessons learned from a mapping on the impact of Covid-19 on administrative detention in seven EU countries (Belgium, Germany, Italy, Malta, Romania, Portugal, Spain) This publication has been supported by the European Programme for Integration and Migration (EPIM), a collaborative initiative of the Network of European Foundations (NEF). The sole responsibility for the publication lies with the organiser(s) and the content may not necessarily reflect the positions of EPIM, NEF or EPIM’s Partner Foundation.” MAPPING COVID-19’S IMPACT ON IMMIGRATION DETENTION: WHY, WHERE, WHEN AND WHAT Between the end of February and the beginning of March 2020 it became clear that the Covid-19 outbreak had reached Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Flood Assessment Due to Sea Level Rise and Extreme Storm Events
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 6 May 2019 doi:10.20944/preprints201905.0052.v1 Peer-reviewed version available at Geosciences 2019, 9, 239; doi:10.3390/geosciences9050239 1 Article 2 Coastal Flood Assessment due to sea level rise and 3 extreme storm events - Case study of the Atlantic 4 Coast of Portugal Mainland 5 Carlos Antunes 1,2,*, Carolina Rocha 2 and Cristina Catita 1,2 6 1 Instituto Dom Luiz, Universidade de Lisboa 7 2 Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa 8 * Correspondence: [email protected]; 9 Received: date; Accepted: date; Published: date 10 Abstract: Portugal Mainland has hundreds of thousands of people living in the Atlantic coastal 11 zone, with numerous high economic value activities and a high number of infrastructures that 12 must be protected from natural coastal hazard, namely extreme storms and sea level rise (SLR). In 13 the context of climate change adaptation strategies, a reliable and accurate assessment of the 14 physical vulnerability to SLR is crucial. This study is a contribution to the implementation of 15 flooding standards imposed by the European Directive 2007/60/EC, which requires each member 16 state to assess the risk associated to SLR and floods caused by extreme events. Therefore, coastal 17 hazard in the Continental Atlantic coast of Portugal Mainland was evaluated for 2025, 2050 and 18 2100 in the whole coastal extension with different sea level scenarios for different extreme event 19 return periods and due to SLR. A coastal flooding probabilistic map was produced based on the 20 developed methodology using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Charkaoui and Bill C-3 Craig Forcese
    The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference Volume 42 (2008) Article 12 A Bismarckian Moment: Charkaoui and Bill C-3 Craig Forcese Lorne Waldman Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/sclr This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Citation Information Forcese, Craig and Waldman, Lorne. "A Bismarckian Moment: Charkaoui and Bill C-3." The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference 42. (2008). http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/sclr/vol42/iss1/12 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The uS preme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. A Bismarckian Moment: Charkaoui and Bill C-3 Craig Forcese and Lorne Waldman* I. INTRODUCTION The German statesman Otto von Bismarck once said that “[i]f you like laws and sausages, you should never watch either one being made.”1 The recent enactment of Bill C-32 — the government’s response to the Supreme Court’s February 2007 decision in Charkaoui v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)3 — can best be described as a “Bismarckian moment”. An effort to remedy the core defects of the prior immigration security certificate regime, the new law cobbles together a potentially half-hearted “special advocate” regime and converts immigration law into a de facto system of indefinite limits on liberty for foreigners. The new system will generate an inevitable series of new constitutional challenges, some of which may succeed at the Supreme Court unless the deficiencies of Bill C-3 are cured by careful innovation at the Federal Court level.
    [Show full text]
  • CSES Module 2
    Prepared by: José Pereira Date: February 15th, 2006 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS Module 2: Sample Design and Data Collection Report Country: Portugal Date of Election: February 20th, 2005 Type of Election (e.g., presidential, parliamentary, legislative): Legislative Elections Organization that conducted the survey field work: The study was coordinated by Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa, but the fieldwork was carried out by CESOP-UCP (Centro de Estudos e Sondagens de Opinião da Universidade Católica Portuguesa). Investigators Responsible for Data Collection: Name: António Barreto Name: André Freire Affiliation: Instituto de Ciências Sociais Affiliation: Instituto Superior de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa do Trabalho e da Empresa Address: Avenida Professor Aníbal de Address: Avenida das Forças Armadas, Bettencourt, 9, 1600-189 Lisboa, Portugal 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal Fax: (351) 21 794 02 74 Fax: Phone: (351) 21 780 47 00 Phone: (351) 21 790 3 000 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Name: Marina Costa Lobo Name: Pedro Magalhães Affiliation: Instituto de Ciências Sociais Affiliation: Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa da Universidade de Lisboa/Universidade Católica Portuguesa Address: Avenida Professor Aníbal de Bettencourt, 9, 1600-189 Lisboa, Portugal Address: Avenida Professor Aníbal de Bettencourt, 9, 1600-189 Lisboa, Portugal Fax: (351) 21 794 02 74 Phone: (351) 21 780 47 00 Fax: (351) 21 794 02 74 E-mail: [email protected] Phone: (351) 21 780
    [Show full text]
  • Immigration Manual
    Immigration Manual November 2006 Baker & McKenzie International is a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional service organizations, reference to a “partner” means a person who is a partner, or equivalent, in such a law firm. Similarly, reference to an “office” means an office of any such law firm. © 2006 Baker & McKenzie All rights reserved. This publication is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study or research permitted under applicable copyright legislation, no part may be reproduced or transmitted by any process or means without prior written permission. IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER. The material in this booklet is of the nature of general comment only. It is not offered as advice on any particular matter and should not be taken as such. The firm and the contributing authors expressly disclaim all liability to any person in respect of anything and in respect of the consequences of anything done or omitted to be done wholly or partly in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this booklet. No client or other reader should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any matter contained in it without taking specific professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances in issue. Immigration Manual Immigration Manual INTRODUCTION This manual is designed to provide a general overview of the immigration laws and procedures of various countries. Please note that the immigration laws and procedures are constantly changing and are subject to new policies and developments. Therefore, this manual is not intended to be exhaustive and specific questions should be directed to the Executive Transfer and Immigration Department of Baker & McKenzie, Hong Kong.
    [Show full text]
  • Deportation As a Crime of International Law
    Is There any Blood on my Hands? Deportation as a Crime of International Law VINCENT CHETAIL∗ Abstract The present article revisits international criminal law as a tool for sanctioning the most patent abuses against migrants. Although deportation is traditionally considered as an attribute of the state inherent to its territorial sovereignty, this prerogative may degenerate into an international crime. The prohibition of deportation has been a well-established feature of international criminal law since the Nuremberg trials following the Second World War. This prohibition has been further refined over the past 15 years by an extensive jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and the International Criminal Court. Against such a background, this article demonstrates that, in some circumstances, deport- ation may amount to a war crime, a crime against humanity or even a crime of genocide, depending on the factual elements of the case and the specific requirements of the relevant crime. This article accordingly reviews the constitutive elements of each crime and transposes them into the context of migration control. It highlights in turn that, although its potential has been neglected by scholars and practitioners, international criminal law has an important role to play for domesticating the state’s prerogative of deportation and infusing the rule of law into the field of migration. The article concludes that there are reasonable grounds for asserting that a crime against humanity would have been committed in the Dominican Republic and Australia with regard to their deportation policy. Key words crime against humanity; deportation; genocide; migration 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Coastal Vulnerability Assessment Due to Sea Level Rise: a Case Study of Atlantic Coast of Portugal’S Mainland
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 27 December 2019 doi:10.20944/preprints201912.0366.v1 Peer-reviewed version available at Water 2020, 12, 360; doi:10.3390/w12020360 Article A Coastal Vulnerability Assessment due to Sea Level Rise: A Case Study of Atlantic Coast of Portugal’s Mainland Carolina Rocha 1, Carlos Antunes 1,2* and Cristina Catita 1,2 1 Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal; [email protected] 2 Instituto Dom Luiz, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +351 21 7500839 Abstract: The sea level rise, a consequence of climate change, is one of the biggest challenges that countries and regions with coastal lowland areas will face in the medium term. This study proposes a methodology for assessing the vulnerability to sea level rise (SLR) on the Atlantic coast of Portugal mainland. Some scenarios of extreme sea level for different return periods and extreme flooding events were estimated for 2050 and 2100, as proposed by the European Union Directive 2007/60/EC. A set of physical parameters are considered for the multi-attribute analysis technique implemented by the Analytic Hierarchy Process, in order to define a Physical Vulnerability Index fundamental to assess coastal vulnerability. For each SLR scenario, coastal vulnerability maps, with spatial resolution of 20 m, are produced at national scale to identify areas most at risk of SLR, constituting key documents for triggering adaptation plans for such vulnerable regions. For 2050 and 2100, it is estimated 903 km2 and 1146 km2 of vulnerable area, respectively, being the district of Lisbon the most vulnerable district in both scenarios.
    [Show full text]
  • German Consulate Boston Passport Renewal
    German Consulate Boston Passport Renewal Undivulged and springless Everard fluoresced his Britishness surnamed counteract feignedly. Sanderson mellows amorally. Bartholemy is hypoglossal: she baaed subacutely and ethicizing her madrases. For instant rejection of cookies to review the rapid deployment of services provided in person and switzerland, convenient location as merely preparing the german passport or block out your chances of If you have been completed application should travel light of success of your passport essential before all your visits often get. The German Consulate General Boston is open to the clue by appointment. Which countries can I travel with German national visa? Living and everything in Germany US Embassy & Consulates. Us certificate or acquiring real id card but after the consul of our secured online document services for? Chicago Boston or New York City most at a Turkish consulate abroad. Vow renewal and commitment ceremonies on the Las Vegas Strip for. Urban Renewal Recycled Tie-Dye the Neck Sweatshirt. All applicants for passports visas and consular matters NEED to insist an. You can smirk at the German Consulate in Boston if you're suggest permanent. Notice concerning passports and registration in consulates. Letter from advising governments issue passports in boston passport to the designated person. Regional Specifications for Passport and Visa Applications and Appointments. Fragomen leverages our document with passport renewal process of passports are renewing their stay in boston, consulate will find out of. Submitting the trinidad passport expedition is surrounded by the country which countries may send your german consulate boston passport renewal application form to set by electronic devices onto storrow drive west.
    [Show full text]
  • Rauma at the Border: the Human Cost of Inhumane Immigration Policies
    U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS TRAUMA AT THE BORDER THE HUMAN COST OF INHUMANE IMMIGRATION POLICIES BRIEFING REPORT U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS Washington, DC 20425 Official Business OCTOBER 2019 Penalty for Private Use $300 Visit us on the Web: www.usccr.gov U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights is an Catherine E. Lhamon, Chairperson* independent, bipartisan agency established Patricia Timmons-Goodson, Vice Chairperson by Congress in 1957. It is directed to: Debo P. Adegbile Gail L. Heriot • Investigate complaints alleging that citizens are Peter N. Kirsanow being deprived of their right to vote by reason of their David Kladney race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national Karen Narasaki origin, or by reason of fraudulent practices. Michael Yaki • Study and collect information relating to discrimination or a denial of equal protection of the laws under the Constitution Mauro Morales, Staff Director because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice. U.S. Commission on Civil Rights 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW • Appraise federal laws and policies with respect to Washington, DC 20425 discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or (202) 376-8128 voice national origin, or in the administration of justice. TTY Relay: 711 • Serve as a national clearinghouse for information www.usccr.gov in respect to discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin. • Submit reports, findings, and recommendations to the President and Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet Digital
    ACT SHEET HOTEL RENOVATION NYRIAQUINTADAMARINHA HOTEL LOCALIZAÇÃO Nº DE PISOS ALOJAMENTO LOCATION FLOORS ACCOMMODATION Quinta da Marinha, Cascais, quartos e suites distribuídos Distrito de Lisboa pelos pisos , e A kms do centro de Cascais, kms RECEÇÃO Quartos para não fumadores do centro de Lisboa e kms do aeroporto RECEPTION e para deficientes villas T e T Quinta da Marinha, Cascais, Lisbon District Receção no Piso 1 do Hotel Receção de Golf na Loja de Golf rooms and 10 suites on floors kms from the Center of Cascais, Non-smoker and kms from Lisbon downtown and Reception on the 1st floor of the Hotel handicapped-adapted rooms kms from the airport Golf Reception by the Golf Shop villas one-bedroom, two-bedroom CLASSIFICAÇÃO ANO DE CONSTRUÇÃO ASSOCIAÇÃO RATING OPENING ASSOCIATED Dezembro de December of RENOVATED FACILIDADES NOS QUARTOS ROOM FACILITIES Ar condicionado Varanda / Terraço TV por cabo VOD (Video On Demand) Canal de televisão interno Telefone Secador de Cabelo Roupão e chinelos Mini-bar RESTAURANTES / RESTAURANTS Rádio Restaurante Five Pines no Piso do Hotel Cofre (peq. almoços e almoços) Internet wireless Restaurante Rocca no Piso do Hotel Air conditioning Restaurante Monte Mar na estrada do Guincho Balcony /Terrace Bar Trent Jones no Piso do Hotel Cable TV Bar da Piscina (Maio a Setembro) VOD (Video On Demand) Room Service no Hotel (hrs por dia) Home TV channel Five Pines Restaurant on ground floor Telephone of the Hotel (breakfast and lunch) Hairdryer Rocca Restaurant on ground floor Bathrobe and slippers Bar
    [Show full text]