Laura Riding Pointed to the Fact That, Looking at the Canon Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Laura Riding Pointed to the Fact That, Looking at the Canon Of UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM LETRAS/INGLÊS E LITERATURA CORRESPONDENTE MINDSCAPES: LAURA RIDING’S POETRY AND POETICS por RODRIGO GARCIA LOPES Tese submetida à Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina em cumprimento parcial dos requisitos para obtenção do grau de DOUTOR EM LETRAS FLORI.\NOPOLIS Dezembro de 2000 Esta Tese de Rodrigo Garcia Lopes, intitulada MINDSCAPES: LAURA RIDING’S POETRY AND POETICS, foi julgada adequada e aprovada em sua forma final, pelo Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras/Inglês e Literatura Correspondente, da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, para fms de obtenção do grau de DOUTOR EM LETRAS Área de concentração; Inglês e Literatura Correspondente Opção: Literaturas de Língua Inglesa Anelise Reich Corseuil Coordenadora BANCA EXAMINADORA; é Roberto O ’Shea ientador e Presidente 'h/y Maria Lúcia MiUéo Martins Examinadora Susana Bornéo Funck Examinadora J^iz Angé^o da Costa Examinador ífid Renaux Examinadora Florianópolis, 11 de dezembro de 2000 In the memory of Laura (Riding Jackson (1901-1991) To my parents, Antonio Ubirajara Lopes and Maria do Carmo Garcia Lopes IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the several people and institutions that helped me, in inestimable ways, to succeed in accomplishing the present thesis. To my advisor, José Roberto O’Shea, for his infinite patience, collaboration, and understanding. To CAPES, for conceding me the scholarship that provided the necessary means to carry out original research on Laura Riding collections in the United States. To The Board of Literary Management of tiie late Laura (Riding Jackson: Dr. James Tyler, Dr. William Harmon, Robert Nye, Theodore Wilentz, Joan Wilentz, and especially to Alan J. Clark, Elizabeth Friedmann, Dr. Mark Jacobs, and Dr. John Nolan. To Lorna Knight, from Carl A. Kroch Library, and the Division of Rare and Manuscript Collection of Cornell University Library, To Susana Bornéo Funck, Elizabeth Horan, and David William Foster, for being earlier supporters and readers of my research. To the staff of Hayden Library, at Arizona State University To Lisa Samuels, Charles Bernstein, Jerome Rothenberg, Ben Friedlander, Chris Daniels, with whom I maintained an extended dialogue on the complexity and peculiarity of Riding’s work, and who helped me with important materials, insists, and encouragement. ABSTRACT i MINDSCAPES: LAURA RIDING’S POETRY AND POETICS RODRIGO GARCIA LOPES UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA 2000 Supervising Professor: José Roberto O’Shea This thesis proposes a revisionist reading of contemporary poetry by examining the case of one of the most forgotten American writers of the twentieth century: Laura (Riding) Jackson (1901-1991). The goal is to demonstrate that Riding not only had a definite and unique poetics, but that hers stands as one of the most extreme and paradoxical stances in Anglo-American modernism, to the point of abandoning the writing of poetry in 1938. Drawing on the concept of “canon formation” as well as the Foucaultian concepts of “discourse” and “author-fiinction,” I investigate the construction of the modem Anglo-American poetic canon, recovering the context and the circumstances of Riding’s “disappearance.” While I cover the “discourses” on poetry circulating in the first half of the twentieth century—Pound’s (“imagism”), Eliot’s (“dissociation of sensibility,” “impersonality,” and “tradition”), and the New Critics’ (“organic unity,” “ambiguity”)—^I offer a critical overview of alternative modernisms being articulated at the time. My intention is to demonstrate that Riding’s poems are telling expressions of a writer to whom “the mind thinking becomes the active force of the poem,” to use Charles Bernstein’s apt formulation. Among my findings is that the reasons for Riding’s non-canonization are many and complex: tlie hegemony of New VI Criticism, her voluntary exile from the literary scene (where reputations are made or thwarted), her refusal to be anthologized and to be explained in critical terms other dian her own. All tiiese factors, together with the “difficulty” of her poetry, contributed to make of Riding “the greatest lost poet of American poetry,” as wrote Kennedi Rexroth. Helped by the insights of two important critics of American poetry, Charles Bernstein and Marjorie Perloff, I defend that Riding’s “poetry of mind”—where what is at stake is that which we think to be our reality—represents a radical shift in modernist poetics from an image-centered to a language-centered poetry. Focusing on the conscious experience and die durational time of thought present in her poems, I conclude that Ridings mindscapes have the precise goal of identifying a universal fact: as human and thinking beings, we are in a permanent condition called language. Número de páginas: 228 Número de palavras: 73.658 V ll RESUMO Esta tese propõe uma leitura revisionista da poesia contemporânea através do exame do caso de um dos mais esquecidos escritores norte-americanos do século XX: Laura (Riding) Jackson (1901-1991). O objetivo é demonstrar que Riding não apenas possuía uma poética definida e singular, mas que ela permanece uma das instâncias mais extremas e paradoxais do modernismo anglo-americano, a ponto de Riding abandonar a escrita da poesia em 1938. Recorrendo a conceitos de “formação do cânone” bem como às noções de “discurso” e “função do autor”, em Foucault, investigo a construção do cânone da poesia moderna anglo-americana, recuperando o contexto e as circunstâncias da ocultação de Riding. Enquanto cubro os “discursos” poéticos em circulação na primeira metade do século XX— o “imagismo” de Pound, a “dissociação da sensibilidade”, “impersonalidade” e “tradição” de Eliot, a “unidade orgância” e “ambigüidade” da Nova Crítica—ofeçeço um panorama crítico de modernismos alternativos sendo articulados à época. Minha intenção é demonstrar que os poemas de Riding são expressões vigorosas de um escritor para quem “a mente pensando se toma a força ativa do poema”, para usar a apta formulação de Charles Bernstein. Entre minhas descobertas sobre as várias e complexas razões que levaram à não-canonização de Riding estão a hegemonia da Nova Crítica, o exílio voluntário de Riding da cena literária (onde são feitas ou desfeitas as reputações), sua recusa em ser antologiada, bem como em ser explicada em termos críticos que não os dela. Todos esses fatores, mais a “dificuldade” de sua poesia, contribuíram para fazer de Riding “a maior poeta esquecida da poesia norte-americana”, como escreveu Kenneth Rexroth. Ajudado pelos insights de dois importantes críticos de poesia norte-americana. Charles Bernstein e Marjorie Perioff, defendo que a “poesia da mente” de Riding—onde o que está Vlll em jogo é que o que pensamos ser a nossa realidade— ^representa uma mudança radical no paradigma da poética modernista: de uma poesia centrada na imagem para uma poesia centrada na linguagem. Focalizando a experiência consciente e o tempo duracional do pensamento presente em seus poemas, concluo que as “pensagens” de Riding têm o objetivo preciso de constatar um fato universal: enquanto seres humanos e pensantes, estamos numa condição permanente chamada linguagem. IX TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements.............................................................................................................................iv Abstract.................................................................................................................................................. v Resume.................................................................................................................................................vii INTRODUCTION: TOPICS FOR A READING OF LAURA RIDING ....................1 A Foucaultian Viewpoint.................................................................................................................... 1 The Problem o f the Canon................................................................................................................. 5 Open Reading................................................................................................................... ..................13 Modern/Modemism/Avant-Garde............................................................................................... 17 The Case o f Laura Riding................................................................................................................. 24 A Life Dedicated to Language.........................................................................................................34 CHAPTER 2: THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE POETIC CANON OF MODERNIST POETRY ...... ....................................................................................................39 Ezra Pound..........................................................................................................................................40 T. S. Eliot and the Impersonal Theory o f Poetry........................................................................ 41 Dissociation o f Sensibility................................................................................................................ 45 The New Criticism.............................................................................................................................51 Close Reading......................................................................................................................................54 Problems witli the New Criticism...................................................................................................56
Recommended publications
  • Title Page of Her First Collection of Poems, the Close Chaplet (1926), Following Their Divorce in 1925
    ! 1! “Hospitality to Words”: Laura Riding’s American Inheritance and Inheritors Philip John Lansdell Rowland Royal Holloway, University of London Submitted for the Degree of PhD ! 3! Abstract This thesis situates the work of Laura Riding in an American tradition of “hospitality to words” extending from Emerson and Emily Dickinson through Gertrude Stein to John Ashbery and contemporary language-oriented writing. The theme is introduced in terms of her linguistic and spiritual ideal of home as a place of truthful speaking, related in turn to her identity as an American writer who renounced the craft of poetry in mid-career. First, Riding’s poetry is “hospitable” in ways akin to Dickinson’s, broadly characterized by Riding’s term, “linguistic intimateness.” There are similarities in their word-conjunctions and styles of poetic argument, as well as their ideas of poetry as “house of possibility” and spiritual home. Riding’s work is then compared with that of her older friend of the late 1920s, Gertrude Stein. The chapter details the shift in Riding’s critical view of Stein; then focuses on the similarly “homely” characteristics of their prose writing and poetics, with particular reference made to Riding’s “Steinian” poems. The central chapters clarify Riding’s conception of truth and related questions of authority, history and responsibility. Chapter 4 explains her poetic vision of “the end of the world” as the introduction to a new world and potentially a new home, and chapter 5 extends the account to include her post-poetic work, The Telling compared to her earlier, collaborative The World and Ourselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Yiddish and the Avant-Garde in American Jewish Poetry Sarah
    Yiddish and the Avant-Garde in American Jewish Poetry Sarah Ponichtera Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2012 ©2012 Sarah Ponichtera All rights reserved All Louis Zukofsky material Copyright Paul Zukofsky; the material may not be reproduced, quoted, or used in any manner whatsoever without the explicit and specific permission of the copyright holder. A fee will be charged. ABSTRACT Yiddish and the Avant-Garde in American Jewish Poetry Sarah Ponichtera This dissertation traces the evolution of a formalist literary strategy through the twentieth century in both Yiddish and English, through literary and historical analyses of poets and poetic groups from the turn of the century until the 1980s. It begins by exploring the ways in which the Yiddish poet Yehoash built on the contemporary interest in the primitive as he developed his aesthetics in the 1900s, then turns to the modernist poetic group In zikh (the Introspectivists) and their efforts to explore primitive states of consciousness in individual subjectivity. In the third chapter, the project turns to Louis Zukofsky's inclusion of Yehoash's Yiddish translations of Japanese poetry in his own English epic, written in dialogue with Ezra Pound. It concludes with an examination of the Language poets of the 1970s, particularly Charles Bernstein's experimental verse, which explores the way that language shapes consciousness through the use of critical and linguistic discourse. Each of these poets or poetic groups uses experimental poetry as a lens through which to peer at the intersections of language and consciousness, and each explicitly identifies Yiddish (whether as symbol or reality) as an essential component of their poetic technique.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Graves
    Robert Graves Robert Graves The University of San Francisco aims “to cultivate the heart that it may love worthwhile things.” First editions with inscriptions and corrected galley proofs of such a writer as Robert Graves, Professor of Poetry at Oxford, have the magic to thrill the student, to give him a love of learning sufficient for a lifetime. Therefore, the University and the Gleeson Library Associates thank Mr. Walter Bartmann for adding to the cultivation of our students by the donation of his collection of first editions of Robert Graves. All titles of this collection are contained in the checklist except ephemera. Titles with asterisk are not in the collection but will be added. ANNUAL MEETING Gleeson Library Associates APRIL 29, 1962 A Checklist Robert Graves Section I Poetry, Novels and Essays 1916 Over the Brazier. David and Goliath. With author's book-plate. 1917 Fairies and Fusiliers. 1919 The White Cloud.* 1920 Treasure Box. Privately printed and signed. 1921 The Pier-Glass. 1922 On English Poetry. Robert Graves http://www.loc.gov/resource/rbpe.0020390s 1923 The Feather Bed. No. 82 of 250 signed. Whipperginny. 1924 Mock Beggar Hall. The Meaning of Dreams. 1925 Welchman's Hose. 525 copies. John Kemp's Wager: A Ballad Opera. My Head! My Head! Contemporary Techniques in Poetry: a Political Analogy. Poetical Unreason and Other Studies. 1926 Another Future of Poetry.* Impenetrability. 1927 Poems 1914–1926. No. 18 of 115 signed. The English Ballad. Lars Porsena or The Future of Swearing. Lawrence and the Arabs. 1928 Mrs. Fisher or The Future of Humour.
    [Show full text]
  • CHARLES BERNSTEIN & HANNAH WEINER Interview for Linebreak
    CHARLES BERNSTEIN & HANNAH WEINER Interview for LINEbreak I was intrigued when I discovered, in the course of seeking permission to publish this transcript, that Hannah Weiner’s 1995 conversation with Charles Bernstein for the public radio program LINEbreak had been edited down for broadcast. The show’s producer, Martín Spinelli, replied quickly to my e-mail: “[Hannah’s] recording session was one of the longest we did for the series.” The raw tape of the session is preserved in Spi- nelli’s archive at the immense UB Poetry Collection, and runs about twenty minutes longer than the broadcast version ar- chived at http://writing.upenn.edu/pennsound/x/LINEbreak. html. In keeping with the spirit of Weiner’s own impusle to let her “nonliterary” surround in, I have transcribed all the conver- sation on the tape. — Robert Dewhurst One extremely hot summer afternoon in 1995 Charles Bern- stein and I drove across Manhattan to Hannah Weiner’s clut- tered but comfortable apartment to record her for our radio series LINEbreak. Charles and I had been recording other po- ets and writers for the series and Hannah was one of last (if not the last) to be taped. This would turn out to be her last broadcast interview before her death. As I set up the recording equipment we wondered about the noise coming in from the open windows and decided to close them for better acoustics. 141 WILD ORCHIDS But even as we sweated in her airless living room the noise from the street made it through and prompted me to stop a couple of times.
    [Show full text]
  • WINTER 2018 Rainer Maria Rilke Poems from the Book of Hours
    Alexander Kluge Temple of the Scapegoat: Opera Stories • Translated from the German by Isabel Cole and Donna Stonecipher • With photographs Revolving around the opera, these tales are an “archaeological excavation of the slag-heaps of our collective existence” (W. G. Sebald) Combining fact and fiction, each of the one hundred and two tales of Al- exander Kluge’s Temple of the Scapegoat (dotted with photos of famous PBK NDP 1395 operas and their stars) compresses a lifetime of feeling and thought: Kluge is deeply engaged with the opera and an inventive wellspring of narrative FICTION JANUARY notions. The titles of his stories suggest his many turns of mind: “Total Com- mitment,” “Freedom,” “Reality Outrivals Theater,” “The Correct Slowing-Down 5 X 8" 288pp at the Transitional Point Between Terror and an Inkling of Freedom,” “A Crucial Character (Among Persons None of Whom Are Who They Think They Are),” ISBN 978-0-8112-2748-3 and “Deadly Vocal Power vs. Generosity in Opera.” An opera, Kluge says, is a blast furnace of the soul, telling of the great singer Leonard Warren who died EBK 978-0-8112-2749-0 onstage, having literally sung his heart out. Kluge introduces a Tibetan scholar who realizes that opera “is about comprehension and passion. The two never 36 CQ TERRITORY W go together. Passion overwhelms comprehension. Comprehension kills pas- sion. This appears to be the essence of all operas, says Huang Tse-we: she US $18.95 CAN $24.95 also comes to understand that female roles face the harshest fates. Compared to the mass of soprano victims (out of 86,000 operas, 64,000 end with the death of the soprano), the sacrifice of tenors is small (out of 86,000 operas ALSO BY ALEXANDER KLUGE: 1,143 tenors are a write-off).” CINEMA STORIES “Alexander Kluge, that most enlightened of writers.” –W.
    [Show full text]
  • Harry Mathews Interview Final
    loggernaut reading series – summer 2012 Harry Mathews: A Meal Should Last Forever Harry Mathews has written some of the most formally inventive, and perversely moving, American fiction and poetry of the last 50 years. As the American standard-bearer for the otherwise predominantly European OuLiPo, his influence can be felt throughout the cultural sphere. He splits his time between France and Key West, where we conducted this interview last April. Mathews has increasingly seemed to me a sage arbiter not only of all things literary, but also of living well. It made sense, therefore, to ask him a few questions about food and wine and their relationship to literature, all of which I have enjoyed heartily in his presence. This conversation between Mathews, the Key-West-based poet and publisher Arlo Haskell, and myself took place over dinner at the erstwhile Key West Italian restaurant Antonia's. We were joined by Marie Chaix, Mathews's wife, and Ashley Kamen, who by the time you read this will have become Haskell's. -Stuart Krimko Harry Mathews: Is the recorder on now? Arlo Haskell: It is, but we'll pretend like it's not. HM: You've already asked me an extremely recordable question. Stuart Krimko: It was really just an appetizer question. I'd asked you whether anyone had asked you in particular about the ways in which food and wine play into your work. HM: One basic thing is that I don't drink whiskey. I love it, but I don't drink it so much anymore. T.S. Eliot said that he often had a glass or two of whiskey to get the creative juices flowing, which was amazing, coming from him, and quite understandable.
    [Show full text]
  • List 35: Robert Graves & Laura Riding
    List 35: Robert Graves & Laura Riding McNaughtan’s Bookshop & Gallery 3a & 4a Haddington Place Edinburgh EH7 4AE +44(0)131 556 5897 [email protected] http://www.mcnaughtans.co.uk a b x @mcnbooks McNaughtan’s Bookshop & Gallery List 35: Robert Graves & Laura Riding items 1-2: Laura Riding 5. Graves, Robert. Poems 1929. London: Printed and published at the Seizin Press, 1929. 1. Riding, Laura. Twenty Poems Less. Paris: Hours Press, 1930. FIRST EDITION, NO. 17 OF 225 COPIES SIGNED BY THE AUTHOR, 8vo, pp. [iv], 33, [3]. Original green cloth, spine lettered in FIRST EDITION, NO. 105 OF 200 COPIES SIGNED BY THE AUTHOR, gilt. Spine slightly faded, front flyleaf toned. £250 folio, pp. [iv], 33, [3]. Original quarter black morocco, photo- graphically-decorated paper boards, spine lettered in gilt. One or two spots to page edges. Spine ends slightly rubbed. £350 Higginson & Williams A33. 2. Riding, Laura. Four 6. Lye, Len. No Unposted Letters to Cath- Trouble. Deya, Ma- erina. Paris: Hours Press, jorca: The Seizin Press, [1930]. 1930. FIRST EDITION, NO. 120 OF 200 FIRST EDITION, NO. 99 COPIES SIGNED BY THE AUTHOR, OF 200 COPIES SIGNED BY small 4to, pp. [vi], 50, [4]. THE AUTHOR, folio, [vi], Original quarter black moroc- 27, [1]. Original quarter co, decorated paper boards (by white buckram, boards Len Lye), spine lettered in gilt. decorated in red, brown Spine just a touch rubbed at and textured gilt by Len head and tail. £300 Lye, spine lettered in gilt. Spine very slightly The second issue, with the tipped-in introductory note which was omit- soiled.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Bernstein Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt896nd20f No online items Charles Bernstein Papers Mandeville Special Collections Library Mandeville Special Collections Library The UCSD Libraries 9500 Gilman Drive University of California, San Diego La Jolla, California 92093-0175 Phone: (858) 534-2533 Fax: (858) 534-5950 URL: http://orpheus.ucsd.edu/speccoll/ Copyright 2005 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Charles Bernstein Papers MSS 0519 1 Descriptive Summary Creator: Bernstein, Charles, 1950- Title: Charles Bernstein Papers, Date (inclusive): 1962-2000 Extent: 50.00 linear feet(129 archives boxes, 5 card file boxes and 5 oversize folders) Abstract: Papers of Charles Bernstein, writer, editor, librettist, educator, and publisher, who is most often associated with L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E, a body of writing named for the journal (1978-1982) by this name which Bernstein co-edited with Bruce Andrews. Bernstein writes poetry, essays and librettos which foreground the materiality and sociality of language as it exists in different contexts. The papers include correspondence with writers, artists, publishers and friends; manuscript drafts and production materials for his collected works, especially CONTENT'S DREAM (1986), A POETICS (1992) and MY WAY (1998); notebooks and journals (1971-1994); and uncollected poem drafts and working papers. Also included are drafts for the multi-authored poem LEGEND written with Ray DiPalma, Bruce Andrews, Steve McCaffery, and Ron Silliman. Bernstein's editorial work on Asylum's Press publications, the L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E Journal, the Segue Catalog, BOUNDRY 2: 43 POETS and BOUNDRY 2: 99 POETS, as well as numerous smaller projects are well represented.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Poetry and Ecopoetry: a Shared Pragmatic Work
    Language Poetry and Ecopoetry: A Shared Pragmatic Work in A.R. Ammons, Charles Bernstein, Susan Howe, and W.S. Merwin Jack Massie A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of East Anglia School of American Studies August 2018 This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived therefrom must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or extract must include full attribution. 1 Abstract The central aim of this thesis is to demonstrate that A.R. Ammons, Charles Bernstein, Susan Howe, and W.S. Merwin commit to a pragmatic poetic project of working language to facilitate cultural renewal. In illuminating this shared pragmatic work in poems from the turn of the 1990s, the thesis contradicts ecocritical assertions about the inimical relationship between ecopoetry and postmodern poetries such as Language. As ecocriticism established itself as a school of literary criticism in the 1990s, its proponents were damning of the influence postmodern literary theory was exerting on American poetry. Ecocritics argued that postmodernism had dangerously devalued the referential relationship between word and world at a time of escalating environmental crises. Taking Bernstein and Howe as representatives of Language poetry, and Ammons and Merwin as representatives of ecopoetry, the thesis will contest this ecocritical argument by illustrating that these four poets share a vision of poetry as a uniquely positioned medium for rejuvenating language and, subsequently, shifting cultural attitudes in a politically progressive manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy sutimitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorged copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9* black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. ProQuest Information and Leaming 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 UMÏ EIHETORICAL HYBRIDITY: ASHBERY, BERNSTEIN AND THE POETICS OF CITAHON DISSERTATION Presented in. Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree Doctor of Philosophy m the Graduate School o f The Ohio State University By \fatthew Richardson^ hlA . ***** The Ohio State Unwersity 2001 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Jon Erickson. Adviser Professor Jessica Prinz .
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Bernstein (1950– ) to Date the Beginning of a Poet's Authority
    Charles Bernstein (1950– ) To date the beginning of a poet’s authority one often looks to the poet’s first book, which in Charles Bernstein’s case is Asylums, published in 1975. Bernstein’s effect on American poetry, however, truly began in 1978, when with Bruce Andrews he started L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E magazine, which ran until 1981. Practically at the same time, then, Bernstein’s presence was announced both as a poet and as someone orchestrating new means of community (re)formation. In the last quarter century, he has lived both roles simultaneously as a refutation of the idea that poets write in isolation. His poetry and his community work have walked in step with each other, neither one possible without the other. Alongside the publishing of well over twenty books of poetry, Bernstein started or helped to start two reading series (Ear Inn in New York, and Wednesdays @ 4 Plus in Buffalo), a website (Electronic Poetry Center), an email discussion list (Poetics@), and an academic book series on Modern and Contemporary Poetics (with University of Alabama Press). His provocative essays have now been collected three times, in Content’s Dream (1986), A Poetics (1992) and My Way (1999), and he has edited or co-edited numerous collections of essays, including The Politics of Poetic Form: Poetry and Public Policy (1990) and Close Listening: Poetry and the Performed Word (1998). Playing on Robert Creeley’s well known expression of the relationship between form and content, one could say with Bernstein’s career in mind [111] that poets are never more than extensions of their community.
    [Show full text]
  • Rewriting History, Literally: Laura Riding's the Close
    Rewriting History, Literally: Laura Riding’s The Close Chaplet Mark Jacobs The Close Chaplet was published on 9 October 1926, by the Woolfs’ Hogarth Press. According to Elizabeth Friedmann, ‘many of the poems for The Close Chaplet were brought in typescript from New York, a few were added in Egypt, and the entire text was carefully edited by Robert’.1 And further: ‘A creative symbiosis was developing between Laura and Robert that allowed them to collaborate for years to come. As one wrote, the other was continually looking over the writer’s shoulder with suggestions, comments, criticism.’2 The book’s title is taken from a stanza of Robert Graves’s poem, ‘The Nape of the Neck’, acting as an epigraph to the book:3 To speak of the hollow nape where the close chaplet Of thought is bound, the loose ends lying neat In two strands downward, where the shoulders open Casual and strong beneath, waiting their burden, And the long spine begins its easy journey: The hair curtains this postern silkily, This secret stairway by which thought will come More personally, with a closer welcome Than through the latticed eyes or portalled ears […]. It is dedicated to ‘My Sister Isabel and to Nancy Nicholson’ and was published under her then married name ‘Laura Riding Gottschalk’. Several of the poems which appear in The Close Chaplet were first published in The Fugitive magazine in 1924 and 1925, as did a number of others, and her name is listed as one of the editors.4 Seven decades after they appeared in her Collected Poems in 1938, Laura Riding’s poems are still, generally speaking, a Critical Studies 536 mystery for their readers.5 Several critics have now written on her work, some focusing on the poems themselves to give clues and directions, but none seems quite adequate, and she herself was to say harsh words on critical works which appeared in her lifetime up to 1991, judging them wrong in the main, or wholly wrong.
    [Show full text]