The Reading Naturalist
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Biological Surveys at Hunsbury Hill Country Park 2018
FRIENDS OF WEST HUNSBURY PARKS BIOLOGICAL SURVEYS AT HUNSBURY HILL COUNTRY PARK 2018 Ryan Clark Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre April 2019 Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre Introduction Biological records tell us which species are present on sites and are essential in informing the conservation and management of wildlife. In 2018, the Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre ran a number of events to encourage biological recording at Hunsbury Hill Fort as part of the Friends of West Hunsbury Park’s project, which is supported by the National Lottery Heritage Fund. Hunsbury Hill Country Park is designated as a Local Wildlife Site (LWS). There are approximately 700 Local Wildlife Sites in Northamptonshire. Local Wildlife Sites create a network of areas, which are important as refuges for wildlife or wildlife corridors. Hunsbury Hill Country Park was designated as a LWS in 1992 for its woodland flora and the variety of habitats that the site possesses. The site also has a Local Geological Site (LGS) which highlights the importance of this site for its geology as well as biodiversity. This will be surveyed by the local geological group in due course. Hunsbury Hill Country Park Local Wildlife Site Boundary 1 Northamptonshire Biodiversity Records Centre (NBRC) supports the recording, curation and sharing of quality verified environmental information for sound decision-making. We hold nearly a million biological records covering a variety of different species groups. Before the start of this project, we looked to see which species had been recorded at the site. We were surprised to find that the only records we have for the site have come from Local Wildlife Site Surveys, which assess the quality of the site and focus on vascular plants, with some casual observations of other species noted too. -
The Reading Naturalist
The Reading Naturalist No. 53 Published by the Reading and District Natural History Society 2001 Price to Non Members £2.50 T H E R E A D I N G N A T U R A L I S T No 53 for the year 2000 The Journal of the Reading and District Natural History Society President Mr Rod d’Ayala Honorary General Secretary Mrs Catherine Butcher Honorary Editor Dr Malcolm Storey Editorial Sub-committee The Editor, Dr Alan Brickstock, Mrs Linda Carter, Mr Hugh H. Carter Miss June M. V. Housden, Mr David G. Notton Honorary Recorders Botany: Mrs Linda Carter, Fungi: Dr Alan Brickstock Entomology: Mr David G. Notton Invertebates other than insects: Mr Hugh H. Carter Vertebrates: Mr Hugh H. Carter CONTENTS Obituary 1 Members’ Observations 1 Excursions Meryl Beek 2 Wednesday Afternoon Walks Alan Brickstock 5 Meetings (1999-2000) Catherine Butcher 6 The Fishlock Prize 7 Membership Norman Hall 8 Presidential address: Some Mycological Ramblings Alan Brickstock 9 Natural History Services provided at the Museum of Reading David G. Notton 13 A Mutant Foxglove Malcolm Storey 16 Sehirus dubius (or should that be dubious!) Chris Raper 17 Hartslock – a Local Success Story Chris Raper 17 Recorders’ Reports Malcolm Storey 19 “RDB” and “N” status – The Jargon Explained Rod d’Ayala 19 Recorder’s Report for Botany 2000 Linda Carter 20 The New Berkshire Flora Malcolm Storey 23 Recorder’s Report for Mycology 2000 Alan Brickstock 24 Recorder’s Report for Entomology 2000 David G. Notton 27 Recorder’s Report for Invertebrates other than insects 2000 Hugh H. -
River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock
NRA Thames 254 National Rivers Authority Thames Region TR44 River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock Catchment Review October 1994 NRA Thames Region Document for INTERNAL CIRCULATION only National River Authority Thames Region Catchment Planning - West River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock Catchment Review October 1994 River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock - Catchment Review CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 2. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE WATER ENVIRONMENT Overview 2 Geology and Topography 2 Hydrology 2 Water Resources 5 Water Quality 9 Pollution Control 14 Consented Discharges 15 * Flood Defence 18 Fisheries 18 Conservation 19 Landscape 21 Recreation 23 Navigation 26 Land Use Planning Context 29 Minerals 31 P2J73/ i River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock - Catchment Review Page 3. CATCHMENT ISSUES 34 South West Oxfordshire Reservoir Proposal 34 Ground water Pollution 35 River Levels & Flows 35 Habitat Degradation 35 Wolvercote Pit 36 Eutrophication of the Thames 36 River Thames : Seacourt Stream Relationship 36 The River Thames Through Oxford 37 Oxford Structures Study 37 Oxford Sewage Treatment Works 37 Kidlington Sewage Treatment Works 38 Oxford Sewers 38 Development Pressure 38 Navigation Issues 39 Landscape Issues 39 Recreation Issues 39 Wiltshire Berkshire Canal 40 Summary of Key Issues 41 4. CATCHMENT ACTIONS 43 5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 51 P2573/ i i River Thames (Eynsham to Benson) and Ock - Catchment Review LIST OF TABLES Page 2.1 Details of Licensed Ground/Surface Water Abstractions of Greater than lML/day 9 2.2 RQOs, -
Biodiversity and Planning in Oxfordshire Contents
Biodiversity and Planning in Oxfordshire Contents Section 1 1 About this guidance ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................3 Protecting and enhancing Oxfordshire’s biodiversity ........................................................................................................................................3 How to use this guidance .............................................................................................................................................................................................3 1 Biodiversity in the planning process ....................................................................................................................................................................................4 1 Information requirements ........................................................................................................................................................................................................5 Section 2 2a Internationally and nationally designated sites ...............................................................................................................................................................6 2b Legally protected species .........................................................................................................................................................................................................8 -
English Nature Research Report
Vatural Area: 33. East Anglian Plain Geological Sigaificance: Outstanding (provisional) General geological character: The solid geology of the East Anglian Natural Area is mainly underlain by Jpper Cretaceous chalk. This very pure limestone was laid down on the floor of a tropical sea between 97 md 74 Ma. Locally the chalk is rich in fossils including sea-urchins and bivalves. Overlying much of the ;halk is a complex sequence of Quaternary deposits (deposited over the last 2 Ma) showing changes in Aimate and environment from both cold (glacial) and temperate (interglacial) periods. These sediments hostcompletely obscure the underlying chalk and it is their composition which gives the Natural Area its :haacter. The base of the Quaternary sequence is the early Pleistocene Crag deposits which are marine jcdiments of*shelly muds and sands, often containing temperate marinc molluscan faunas. However, the nost extensive and thickest Quaternary sediments consist of glacial sands, gravels and clays deposited by the 4nglian ice sheet as it advanced across the area around 300,000 to 250,000 years BP. These deposits are ;ollectivcly known as 'boulder clay' and their calcareous nature reflects glacial erosion and transportation of he chalk bedrock beneath. The Anglian glaciation interrupted a well-developed fluvial network of eastward flowing rivers, and patches of these preglacial river gravels are still found within the area. Many localitites show river gravels related to the early development of the River Thames, which crossed this area prior to jiversion by the Anglian ice sheet. These sites are important for Quaternary stratigraphy (including records Jf climate change) because they can be correlated with sedirnents in other parts of Britain and abroad. -
DNA Barcoding the Geometrid Fauna of Bavaria (Lepidoptera): Successes, Surprises, and Questions
DNA Barcoding the Geometrid Fauna of Bavaria (Lepidoptera): Successes, Surprises, and Questions Axel Hausmann1*, Gerhard Haszprunar1, Paul D. N. Hebert2 1 Entomology Department, Zoological Collection of the State of Bavaria, Munich, Germany, 2 Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada Abstract Background: The State of Bavaria is involved in a research program that will lead to the construction of a DNA barcode library for all animal species within its territorial boundaries. The present study provides a comprehensive DNA barcode library for the Geometridae, one of the most diverse of insect families. Methodology/Principal Findings: This study reports DNA barcodes for 400 Bavarian geometrid species, 98 per cent of the known fauna, and approximately one per cent of all Bavarian animal species. Although 98.5% of these species possess diagnostic barcode sequences in Bavaria, records from neighbouring countries suggest that species-level resolution may be compromised in up to 3.5% of cases. All taxa which apparently share barcodes are discussed in detail. One case of modest divergence (1.4%) revealed a species overlooked by the current taxonomic system: Eupithecia goossensiata Mabille, 1869 stat.n. is raised from synonymy with Eupithecia absinthiata (Clerck, 1759) to species rank. Deep intraspecific sequence divergences (.2%) were detected in 20 traditionally recognized species. Conclusions/Significance: The study emphasizes the effectiveness of DNA barcoding as a tool for monitoring biodiversity. Open access is provided to a data set that includes records for 1,395 geometrid specimens (331 species) from Bavaria, with 69 additional species from neighbouring regions. Taxa with deep intraspecific sequence divergences are undergoing more detailed analysis to ascertain if they represent cases of cryptic diversity. -
Mikeoxon by Mikeoxon, 10-Mar-14 12:18 AM GMT
MikeOxon by MikeOxon, 10-Mar-14 12:18 AM GMT Although I have been contributing to the forums for a while, I have not previously started a personal diary, mainly because I have my own website and this seemed enough. I'm finding now that posting yet more photos of well-known butterflies has a declining appeal and so I have decided to try the diary format, to see how a new 'butterfly year' pans out. I always find this time of year amazing - one moment it's Winter - cold, gloomy, damp days and early nights - and then, seemingly so suddenly, the evenings are lighter and the sun appears again. Of course, there is still plenty of time for spells of really cold weather but, nevertheless, the mood is definitely upbeat! Last year, I was fortunate to see and photograph, in early March, five species at one of my local reserves - Dry Sandford Pit, near the village of Cothill between Oxford and Abingdon. It is one of a small cluster of reserves, which share an unusual alkaline fen habitat that produces a range of interesting flora and fauna. See http://www.bbowt.org.uk/reserves/dry-sandford-pit for more info. Dry Sandford Pit - the open fen So, with the onset of warm, sunny weather, I made my first trip of the year to Dry Sandford this afternoon (9th March). At first, it seemed very quiet and I scanned the warm-coloured sandstone quarry face in vain but, early in the afternoon, a coolish breeze dropped and suddenly, there were Peacocks ad Brimstones basking on the warm stones or patrolling the length of the low clif. -
Temporal Partitioning in an Assemblage of Insect Defoliators Feeding on Oak on a Mediterranean Mountain
Eur. J. Entomol. 109: 55–69, 2012 http://www.eje.cz/scripts/viewabstract.php?abstract=1680 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Temporal partitioning in an assemblage of insect defoliators feeding on oak on a Mediterranean mountain MARIA KALAPANIDA1 and PANOS V. PETRAKIS2* 1 National Agricultural Research Foundation, Forest Research Inst., 57006 Vassilika, Thessaloniki, Greece 2 National Agricultural Research Foundation, Institute for Mediterranean Forest Ecosystem Research, Laboratory of Entomology, Terma Alkmanos, 11528 Ilissia, Athens, Greece Key words. Quercus, Lepidoptera, Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, oak defoliators, phenology, species coexistence, niche overlap, zoogeographical categories, feeding specialization, Mt Holomontas Chalkidiki Greece Abstract. Insects feeding on the foliage of oak were studied on a mountain where species of Mediterranean deciduous and evergreen oak coexist. There were 58 insect species (54 Lepidoptera, 1 Coleopteran and 3 Hymenoptera) belonging to twenty families in the assemblage feeding on eight species of Quercus, two of which are introduced from nearby regions. The overlap in occurrence in time and of feeding niches of the insects feeding on the foliage of the different species of oak was determined using the: (a) Poole- Rathcke method, which tests phenological overlap and (b) Petraitis method, which tests niche overlap. This indicated that insect families partition seasonal time in a random and the entire assemblage in a regular way. All groups of insects partitioned season ran- domly except for the pairs of monophagous-oligophagous and Palearctic-Eurosiberian species, which partition season regularly. Oak folivorous insects correctly perceive the three subgenera of oaks with the exception of the planted Q. robur pedunculiflora. The folivorous insects recorded on the Mediterranean evergreen oaks (subgenus Sclerophyllodrys) differ from those on the other two sub- genera (Quercus and Cerris) and co-occurring deciduous trees. -
Western Palaearctic Oedicephalini and Phaeogenini
2014, Entomologist’s Gazette 65: 109–129 Western Palaearctic Oedicephalini and Phaeogenini (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae, Ichneumoninae) in the National Museums of Scotland, with distributional data including 28 species new to Britain, rearing records, and descriptions of two new species of Aethecerus Wesmael and one of Diadromus Wesmael ERICH DILLER Zoologische Staatssammulung München, Münchhausenstrasse 21, D–81247 München, Germany [email protected] MARK R. SHAW1 National Museums of Scotland, Chambers Street, Edinburgh EH1 1JF, U.K. [email protected] Synopsis An account is given of approximately 3,250 western Palaearctic specimens, comprising 110 determined species, of the tribes Oedicephalini and Phaeogenini in the National Museums of Scotland. Distributional and phenological data are given for all species, and rearing records are provided for about 50, although not always with the host’s identity fully clear. Twenty eight species are newly recorded from Britain, of which Aethecerus horstmanni sp. nov., Aethecerus ruberpedatus sp. nov. and Diadromus nitidigaster sp. nov. are described and figured. Tycherus histrio (Wesmael, 1848) sp. rev. is raised from synonymy with Tycherus ischiomelinus (Gravenhorst, 1829); Dicaelotus schmiedeknechti nom. nov. is provided for Dicaelotus ruficornis (Schmiedeknecht, 1903) nec (Ashmead, 1890); Aethecerus subuliferus (Holmgren, 1890) is proposed as a comb. nov.; and Phaeogenes nigridens Wesmael, 1848, is proposed as a comb. rev. Keywords: Ichneumonidae, Ichneumoninae, Oedicephalini, Phaeogenini, parasitoids, taxonomy, phenology, distribution, hosts, Lepidoptera, British Isles. Introduction The National Museums of Scotland (NMS) has an extensive collection of western Palaearctic Ichneumonoidea which is mostly of fairly recent origin (since about 1980) and has a reasonably good standard of specimen preparation and data. -
Naturalist No
The Reading Naturalist No. 27 Published by the Reading and District Natural History Society 1975 Price to Non-Members lSp including postage - 1 - THE READING NATURALIST No. 27 for the; year 1973-74 The Journal of The Reading and District Natural Hi~tb; ry " Society President: Dr. ' H. J. M. Bowen~ M.A. Hon. General Secretary: Hon., .Edi tor: Miss J. Toothill, · B.Sc", Ph.D MissE. Nelmes Editorial Sub-Committee: The Editor, B.: R. Baker, Mise ·t .. E.'Cobb, A. Price, Miss J. M. V. Housden, Miss S. Y. ~ownend Honorary Recorders: Botany: Mrs. B. M. Newman Entomology: Mr. B. R. Baker " Vertebrates: Mr. H. H. C_arter Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Naturalists' Trust: Hon. County Secretary (Berks.): Mr. B. R. Baker, Th~ . M':ls - eum, Reading ;,. - 2 - CONTENTS " Page Meetings and Exc:urs,ions 3 Presidential Address: The Present Status of the Mammals of the Reading area. H. H. Carter 4 Observations of Molluscs, p,round ; R., J .. M. Bowen 8 Reading The Lepid6ptera of Moor Copse Nature ~eserve B. R. Baker 12 The Vanishi~nk1n6raof the Neighbourhodd of Reading A. G. Erith 20 (Reminisberices of a Botany Teacher) The Destruction of the Carex montana Site at ' WQkingh~m . : H. J. M.: . Jj.owen 23 , Fungi found in Savernake Forest 21.9.74 B. A. Bowen 24 " Report, on Aston Upthorpe - 1974 M. Sell 26 " - . ' Honorary Recorders' Reports! ~ Vertebrates " H. H. Carter 28 Entomology B. R. Baker 31 . , . ' ., Botany B. M. Newman 37 Weather Records in 1974 A. E. Moon 40 . •.. i~ . .. ...:.. ..:; Monthly Weather Notes 1974 ..; A ' ~ ' E~ Moon 41 Atmospheric Pollution 1974 ' ft. -
Landscape-Scale Conservation of Farmland Moths
CHAPTER 8 Landscape-scale conservation of farmland moths Thomas Merckx and David W. Macdonald When through the old oak forest I am gone, Let me not wander in a barren dream John Keats, On Sitting Down to Read King Lear Once Again. 8.1 Scope of agri-environment schemes the ecosystem services (such as crop pollination, pest control, water retention, and soil protection) provided Biodiversity has declined substantially throughout by the adjoining non-farmed land. Nevertheless, some much of the European wider countryside. The most biodiversity of the original ecosystems may be re- promising tools to reverse these declines are widely tained within farmland ecosystems, its amount heavily thought to be agri-environment schemes (AES) (Don- dependent on the spatial extent and degree of farm- ald and Evans 2006). These governmental schemes land intensification. Indeed, although species typic- provide financial rewards for ‘environmentally ally ‘prefer’ one ecosystem, they often occur in, and friendly’ methods of farmland management. However, use resources from, neighbouring ecosystems (Pereira AES do not always produce significant biodiversity and Daily 2006; Dennis 2010). As such, many species benefits (Kleijn et al. 2006; Batáry et al. 2010). For ex- may manage to persist within farmland systems, with ample, in the UK, the broad and shallow ‘Entry Level at least some of them, such as the speckled wood Pa- Stewardship’ has often been unrewarding for wildlife rarge aegeria, originally a woodland butterfly, adapting (e.g. Davey et al. 2010, but see Baker et al. 2012), but, to these ‘novel’ ecosystems (Merckx et al. 2003). As a in many cases, the more targeted ‘higher level’ scheme result, extensively farmed systems can often be char- has exceeded expectations (Jeremy Thomas, pers. -
BBOWT Conservation Report 2018 for Web 0.Pdf
Berkshire Buckinghamshire Oxfordshire Conservation Report 2018 Berks, Bucks & Oxon Wildlife Trust (BBOWT) BBOWT’s impact on the biodivesity of Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Debbie Lewis, Ecology Manager, Feb 2019 Acknowledgements The survey data contained within this report have been diligently collected and processed by many hundreds of volunteers, staff and contractors for more than 15 years, and we would like to express our thanks for their time, effort and dedication in collecting all this invaluable information. We would also like to thank the many and varied volunteers who help the Trust carry out conservation management on nature reserves and in the wider countryside; without their help we would be unable to make such an amazing positive difference to local wildlife. The Conservation Report was written by the Biodiversity Team with significant input (especially the case studies) from a large number of other staff whose time and assistance was crucial in being able to deliver the report. Finally but definitely not least, we would also like to thank all the Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Wildlife Trust members, donors and grant giving bodies whose financial support makes our work possible. Special thanks go to: Colin Williams and Andy Coulson-Phillips for their work on the case studies, and to Andy Fairbairn for data processing. Other contributors include Haidrun Breith, Sam Cartwright, Simon Claybourne, Lisa Lane, Martyn Lane, Julia Lofthouse, Marcus Militello, Hilary Phillips, Kate Prudden, Neil Rowntree, Roger Stace, Giles Strother, Mark Vallance, Jude Verdon, Nicky Warden and Pim Young Cover image by David Mole 1 Contents Executive summary ……………………………………………. 3 1. Introduction…………………………………………………… 6 2.