DOCSLIB.ORG

Beverley Brook Partnership

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Beverley Brook Partnership BEVERLEY BROOK PARTNERSHIP Working together since 2013, the Beverley Brook Catchment Partnership aims to improve, restore and protect the health of the Beverley Brook and its catchment for both local wildlife and local communities. THE RIVER Starting in Worcester Park, the Beverley Brook travels north passing through key green spaces such as Richmond Park and Wimbledon Common and joining the Thames in Barnes. “Our vision is for the Beverley Brook to be a clean river, rich in biodiversity, that is a resource for an engaged local community” Explore this Catchment Plan to find out more about the Beverley Brook: its history, the issues it faces and what the Partnership is doing to restore and protect the Beverley Brook. THE BEVERLEY BROOK “Beverley Brook comes from Beaver’s Ley, which means place where Beavers rest” Was the Brook named after beavers which once inhabited the river? KEY INFORMATION LAND COVER Length 14.3km Tributaries Pyl Brook and East Pyl Catchment Area 64 km2 Type Heavily Modified Population 880,000 The Beverley Brook rises in Worcester Park and travels 14 km to Richmond where it joins the River Thames at Barn Elms. The Brook passes through Richmond Park, Wimbledon Common and the London Wetland Centre, all of which are Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) and key green spaces in south London. Historically, the Beverley Brook rose from minor springs along the edge of the North Downs, but with increases in ground-water Based upon LCM2015 © NERC (CEH) 2017 abstraction, these springs no longer exist Improved and now the Brook is entirely Woodland grassland disconnected from the Freshwater chalk aquifer. Heather grassland Suburban Today, the flow of the Arable and Beverley Brook is Urban Horticulture maintained by treated effluent from the GEOLOGYGEOLOGY Hogsmill Sewage Thanet Sand White Chalk Treatment Works and surface water runoff Lambeth Clay Thames Clay from the surrounding River Terrace Deposits catchment. Alluvium Sand and gravel © British Geological Survey (BGS) Beverley Brook Catchment Plan 2020 2 THE BEVERLEY BROOK A HEAVILY MODIFIED RIVER The Brook was altered and changed throughout the 20th century to make room for development and in the name of flood risk. The main channel was straightened, widened and Richmond Park deepened; disconnected from its floodplain with concrete banks and wooden toe boarding. These modifications have left a bare, uniform channel with few places for fish and other wildlife to seek refuge from the high, flashy flows and intermittent pollution events. Wimbledon Common THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE (WFD) The WFD is a legislative framework designed to protect and improve the quality of all water resources within the UK and the European Union. To monitor, progress and drive improvement, individual chemical and biological elements are assessed and classified as High, Good, Moderate, Poor and Bad; with the aim of bringing all waterbodies up to Good status. WFD Status: Moderate Ecological Status For the purpose of the Water Framework Heavily Modified Waterbody Directive, the Beverley Brook is classified Ecological Status Cycle 2 as a Heavily Modified Waterbody, Fish Macrophytes having been substantially changed in character by human physical Invertebrates Phytobenthos modifications. The target is therefore for Physico-chemical Status Cycle 2 the Beverley Brook to reach Good Ecological Potential (GEP) and not Good Phosphate Dissolved Oxygen Ecological Status (GES). Ammonium pH The Beverley Brook is currently considered to be of Moderate Ecological Potential, with phosphate concentrations being the limiting factor. However, the data highlights that all biological elements are classified as below good status, with fish populations of particular concern for the river, classified as bad. It is important to note that WFD classifications are not always a true representation of the reality, often based on limited sample sites with few repetitions. Considering local knowledge and other evidence is therefore key in understanding the catchment. Beverley Brook Catchment Plan 2020 3 THE BEVERLEY BROOK KEY ISSUES FOR THE BEVERLEY BROOK 1. WATER QUANTITY At times, a significant proportion of the base flow of the Beverley Brook comes from the Hogsmill Sewage Treatment Works, in the form of treated effluent. While this can safeguard against low flows in the summer, it can also make the river highly vulnerable to fluctuations in the quantity and quality of the water from this source. The remainder of the flow comes from urban surface water run-off. With the increased paving and development of the catchment, surface water now reaches the Brook much faster, with little infiltration into the ground. This has made the Brook flashy in nature, with sudden high peaks in flow. This is further exacerbated by the heavily modified channel which has been altered and changed through the 20th century including straightening, widening and deepening. These modifications have left a bare, uniform channel with few places for fish and other wildlife to seek refuge from the high flows which can wash out fish and other wildlife. 2. WATER QUALITY Urban Road Run-Off A large proportion of the Brook’s flow comes from surface water, which in an urban environment also brings poor water quality, with heavy metals and other contaminants such as oil (pictured left) washing into the Brook from London’s roads. Phosphate The river is failing for phosphate under the WFD classification. High phosphate levels can increase plant growth, including algae, which if left unchecked can cause eutrophication of the water. The primary source of phosphate is the treated effluent from the Hogsmill Sewage Treatment Works which is pumped into the Beverley Brook to maintain flows. Although the Hogsmill STW systems has systems installed to remove phosphate (P-stripping), the process is still unable to reduce concentrations to an acceptable level for a natural river environment. Misconnections & Combined Sewer Outfalls There is strong evidence that there are other sources of ammonia and phosphate entering the Beverley Brook, aside from the Hogsmill STW effluent, most likely from misconnected properties (waste water from household appliances being discharged directly into the river by incorrect plumbing) and CSOs. Beverley Brook Catchment Plan 2020 4 THE BEVERLEY BROOK KEY ISSUES FOR THE BEVERLEY BROOK 3. HABITATS FOR FISH & INVERTEBRATES Fish require a number of different habitats to complete their life cycles including spawning grounds, fry refuges, habitats to hunt, refuge from predators and over-wintering areas. With a straight, featureless channel, there are few of these habitat features available to fish in the Beverley Brook (pictured right). The lack of backwaters, side channels and refuges leave fish with nowhere to escape during the high, flashy flows of the Brook. Sedimentation is also a key issue for the river. Modifications, such as the deepening and widening of the channel, have decreased the power of the flow in the Brook which has increased silt and sand deposition (pictured below), smothering the natural river bed. In Richmond Park, over grazing from deer increases bank erosion and silt inputs. Although stocked fish thrive in isolated reaches of the Brook, natural recruitment is poor. This highlights the specific lack of suitable spawning gravels and juvenile fry habitats. High phosphate levels encourage the growth of algae, hindering the establishment of more desirable aquatic vegetation. Large sections of the brook are also over-shaded, further inhibiting macrophyte growth that would provide valuable cover for fish and invertebrates. Any aquatic plants that do establish are likely to be washed away downstream during flashy flows. Beverley Brook Catchment Plan 2020 5 THE BEVERLEY BROOK AN ACTION PLAN FOR THE BEVERLEY BROOK The Catchment Partnership has identified some priority Aims and Objectives, linked to the key issues for the Beverley Brook. These Aims and Objectives have been used to develop actions which describe how the Partnership will work together to deliver improvements to the river. AIMS OBJECTIVES Assess the species, habitats and features along the HABITATS AND BIODIVERSITY Beverley Brook, identifying areas for enhancement or improved connectivity Habitats along the Beverley Brook are Deliver projects to enhance and restore habitats along varied, plentiful and healthy. The river the Beverley Brook corridor can support its key flagship species. Identify and remove invasive non-native species (INNS) along the Beverley Brook Remove litter and plastic pollution from the river Urban diffuse pollution is addressed, or mitigated for, WATER QUALITY across the catchment The Beverley Brook has clean water, that is Phosphate inputs are reduced resilient to change and protected by landowners and the local community. Water quality monitoring across the catchment is improved or enhanced Improve understanding of the flow regime through the WATER MANAGEMENT catchment Identify areas for practical projects to improve flow diversity and variation The Beverley Brook has a more natural Deliver habitat restoration projects that naturalise flow regime which is resilient to future flow along the river pressures. Reduce flood risk and the flashy nature of river Abstractions and recirculation systems are more resilient and reliable Raise the profile of the Beverley Brook and improve COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT public understanding of the Catchment Partnership Provide opportunities for the public to engage with the People value the Beverley Brook
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Summary Report
    Report by Rocket Science for The Barnes Fund This report draws on a wide range of data and on benefitted enormously from their input. Second, the experiences of a diverse sample of local we are grateful to 41 representatives from local residents to tell the story of need within our organisations who came together in focus groups community. The Barnes Fund concluded in late to discuss need in Barnes; to a number of others 2019 that we would like to commission such a who shared their views separately; to the 12 report in 2020, our 50th anniversary year, both to residents who took on the challenge of being inform our own grant making programme and as a trained as peer researchers; and to the 110 community resource. In the event the work was residents who agreed to be interviewed by them. carried out at a time when experience of Covid-19 The report could not have been written without and lockdown had sharpened many residents’ sense their willingness to provide frank feedback, of both ‘community’ and ‘need’ and there was much thoughts and ideas. And finally, we are grateful to that was being learned. At the same time, we have Rocket Science, who were chosen by the Steering been keen to take a longer-term perspective – both Group based on their expertise and relevant backwards in terms of understanding what pre- experience to carry out the research on our behalf, existing data tells us about ourselves and forwards who rose to the challenge of doing everything in terms of understanding hopes, concerns and remotely (online or via the phone) and who have expectations beyond the immediate health listened to, questioned, and directed us all before emergency.
    [Show full text]
  • HA16 Rivers and Streams London's Rivers and Streams Resource
    HA16 Rivers and Streams Definition All free-flowing watercourses above the tidal limit London’s rivers and streams resource The total length of watercourses (not including those with a tidal influence) are provided in table 1a and 1b. These figures are based on catchment areas and do not include all watercourses or small watercourses such as drainage ditches. Table 1a: Catchment area and length of fresh water rivers and streams in SE London Watercourse name Length (km) Catchment area (km2) Hogsmill 9.9 73 Surbiton stream 6.0 Bonesgate stream 5.0 Horton stream 5.3 Greens lane stream 1.8 Ewel court stream 2.7 Hogsmill stream 0.5 Beverley Brook 14.3 64 Kingsmere stream 3.1 Penponds overflow 1.3 Queensmere stream 2.4 Keswick avenue ditch 1.2 Cannizaro park stream 1.7 Coombe Brook 1 Pyl Brook 5.3 East Pyl Brook 3.9 old pyl ditch 0.7 Merton ditch culvert 4.3 Grand drive ditch 0.5 Wandle 26.7 202 Wimbledon park stream 1.6 Railway ditch 1.1 Summerstown ditch 2.2 Graveney/ Norbury brook 9.5 Figgs marsh ditch 3.6 Bunces ditch 1.2 Pickle ditch 0.9 Morden Hall loop 2.5 Beddington corner branch 0.7 Beddington effluent ditch 1.6 Oily ditch 3.9 Cemetery ditch 2.8 Therapia ditch 0.9 Micham road new culvert 2.1 Station farm ditch 0.7 Ravenbourne 17.4 180 Quaggy (kyd Brook) 5.6 Quaggy hither green 1 Grove park ditch 0.5 Milk street ditch 0.3 Ravensbourne honor oak 1.9 Pool river 5.1 Chaffinch Brook 4.4 Spring Brook 1.6 The Beck 7.8 St James stream 2.8 Nursery stream 3.3 Konstamm ditch 0.4 River Cray 12.6 45 River Shuttle 6.4 Wincham Stream 5.6 Marsh Dykes
    [Show full text]
  • The London Rivers Action Plan
    The london rivers action plan A tool to help restore rivers for people and nature January 2009 www.therrc.co.uk/lrap.php acknowledgements 1 Steering Group Joanna Heisse, Environment Agency Jan Hewlett, Greater London Authority Liane Jarman,WWF-UK Renata Kowalik, London Wildlife Trust Jenny Mant,The River Restoration Centre Peter Massini, Natural England Robert Oates,Thames Rivers Restoration Trust Kevin Reid, Greater London Authority Sarah Scott, Environment Agency Dave Webb, Environment Agency Support We would also like to thank the following for their support and contributions to the programme: • The Underwood Trust for their support to the Thames Rivers Restoration Trust • Valerie Selby (Wandsworth Borough Council) • Ian Tomes (Environment Agency) • HSBC's support of the WWF Thames programme through the global HSBC Climate Partnership • Thames21 • Rob and Rhoda Burns/Drawing Attention for design and graphics work Photo acknowledgements We are very grateful for the use of photographs throughout this document which are annotated as follows: 1 Environment Agency 2 The River Restoration Centre 3 Andy Pepper (ATPEC Ltd) HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE This booklet is to be used in conjunction with an interactive website administered by the The River Restoration Centre (www.therrc.co.uk/lrap.php).Whilst it provides an overview of the aspirations of a range of organisations including those mentioned above, the main value of this document is to use it as a tool to find out about river restoration opportunities so that they can be flagged up early in the planning process.The website provides a forum for keeping such information up to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Tideway (PDF)
    BASIC PRINCIPLES OF TIDEWAY NAVIGATION A chart to accompany The Tideway Code: A Code of Practice for rowing and paddling on the Tidal Thames > Upper Tideway Code Area (Special navigation rules) Col Regs (Starboard navigation rule) With the tidal stream: Against either tidal stream (working the slacks): Regardless of the tidal stream: PEED S Z H O G N ABOVE WANDSWORTH BRIDGE Outbound or Inbound stay as close to the I Outbound on the EBB – stay in the Fairway on the Starboard Use the Inshore Zone staying as close to the bank E H H High Speed for CoC vessels only E I G N Starboard (right-hand/bow side) bank as is safe and H (right-hand/bow) side as is safe and inside any navigation buoys O All other vessels 12 knot limit HS Z S P D E Inbound on the FLOOD – stay in the Fairway on the Starboard Only cross the river at the designated Crossing Zones out of the Fairway where possible. Go inside/under E piers where water levels allow and it is safe to do so (right-hand/bow) side Or at a Local Crossing if you are returning to a boat In the Fairway, do not stop in a Crossing Zone. Only boats house on the opposite bank to the Inshore Zone All small boats must inform London VTS if they waiting to cross the Fairway should stop near a crossing Chelsea are afloat below Wandsworth Bridge after dark reach CADOGAN (Hammersmith All small boats are advised to inform London PIER Crossings) BATTERSEA DOVE W AY F A I R LTU PIER VTS before navigating below Wandsworth SON ROAD BRIDGE CHELSEA FSC HAMMERSMITH KEW ‘STONE’ AKN Bridge during daylight hours BATTERSEA
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Roehampton Gate Walk
    Short Walks in Richmond Park 4. Roehampton Gate Roehampton Gate Garden - 50 m - Turn left away from * * the gates on the path Ash tree Distance and terrain: 2,100m (1¼ miles). Easy walk with slight gradients and some uneven ground. We recommend you * towards the car park. * Wych elm (P1) This is one of a series of self-guided, short, nature walks from Park gates. take a tree ID book/app More willows on * Beverley Brook (P4) For longer self-guided walks, try our Walks with Remarkable Trees: www.frp.org.uk/tree-walks/ Cross the road and pass between two when walking this route. small copses on the other side. Walk to * some fenced trees and then fork right towards three small trees with cones on. The walk starts with a large ash tree just beyond the small Roehampton Gate garden. P1 * Ashes can carry male or female flowers or occasionally both – this one is female. * * Fenced veteran oaks * Cross the road, Three alder trees (P2) A little further on is a wych elm (P1) with toothed slightly asymmetrical leaves, which turn right and go * Turn left towards the brook and then has withstood the threat of Dutch Elm Disease. back to the start. * walk to the road bridge 350m away. Fantastic crack willows along Beverley Brook Over the road is an example of some fencing around Blasted oak (see text) * Turn right when you get to veteran oak trees. The fencing (partly funded by the road, cross the bridge Friends of Richmond Park) protects the public from and (counting from the right) Many of Keep right over the take the second main path the danger of falling branches and protects the tree the English oaks in bridge at the bottom up the slope.
    [Show full text]
  • Outdoor Learning Providers in the Borough
    Providers of Outdoor Learning in Richmond Environmental, Friends of Parks and Residents Groups Environment Trust Website: www.environmenttrust.co.uk Email: [email protected] Phone: 020 8891 5455 Contact: Stephen James Events are advertised on http://www.environmenttrust.co.uk/whats-on Friends of Barnes Common Website: www.barnescommon.org.uk Email: [email protected] Phone: 07855 548 404 Contact: Sharon Morgan Events are advertised on www.barnescommon.org.uk/learning Friends of Bushy and Home Parks Website: www.fbhp.org.uk Email: [email protected] Events are advertised on www.fbhp.org.uk/walksandtalks Green Corridor Land based horticultural qualifications for young people aged 14-35. Website: www.greencorridor.org.uk Email: [email protected] Phone: 01403 713 567 Contact: Julie Docking Updated March 2016 Friends of the River Crane Environment (FORCE) Website: www.force.org.uk Email: [email protected] For walks and talks, community learning, and outdoor learning for schools in sites in the lower Crane Valley see http://e-voice.org.uk/force/calendar/view Friends of Carlisle Park Website: http://e-voice.org.uk/friendsofcarlislepark/ Ham United Group Website: www.hamunitedgroup.org.uk Email: [email protected] Phone: 020 8940 2941 Contact: Penny Frost River Thames Boat Project Educational, therapeutic and recreational cruises and activities on the River Thames. Website: www.thamesboatproject.org Email: [email protected] Phone: 020 8940 3509 Contact: Pippa Thames Explorer Trust Website: www.thames-explorer.org.uk Email: [email protected] Phone: 020 8742 0057 Contact: Lorraine Conterio or Simon Clarke Summer playscheme - www.thames-explorer.org.uk/families/summer-playscheme Foreshore walks - www.thames-explorer.org.uk/foreshore-walks/ YMCA London South West Website: www.ymcalsw.org Contact: Myke Catterall Updated March 2016 Thames Young Mariners Thames Young Mariners in Ham offer outdoor learning opportunities for schools, youth groups, families and adults all year round including day and residential visits.
    [Show full text]
  • 1000 Years of Barnes History V5
    Over 1000 years of Barnes History Timeline from 925 to 2015 925 Barnes, formerly part of the Manor of Mortlake owned by the Archbishop of Canterbury, is given by King Athelstan to the Dean and Chapter of St Paul’s Cathedral. 1085 Grain sufficient to make 3 weeks supply of bread and beer for the Cathedral’s live-in Canons must be sent from Barnes to St Paul’s annually. Commuted to money payment late 15th Century. 1086 Domesday Book records Barnes valued for taxation at £7 p.a. Estimated population 50-60. 1100 - 1150 Original St Mary‘s Parish Church built at this time (Archaeological Survey 1978/9). 1181 Ralph, Dean of St Paul’s, visits Barnes, Wednesday 28th Jan to assess the value of the church and manor. The priest has 10 acres of Glebe Land and a tenth of the hay crop. 1215 Richard de Northampton, Priest at the Parish Church. Archbishop Stephen Langton said to have re-consecrated the newly enlarged church on his return journey from Runnymede after the sealing of Magna Carta. 1222 An assessment of the Manor of Barnes by Robert the Dean. Villagers must work 3 days a week on the demesne (aka the Barn Elms estate) and give eggs, chickens and grain as in 1085 in return for strips of land in the open fields. Estimated population 120. 1388 Living of Barnes becomes a Rectory. Rector John Lynn entitled to Great Tithes (10% of all produce) and right of fishing in Barnes Pond. 1415 William de Millebourne dies at Milbourne House.
    [Show full text]
  • London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames
    Official LONDON BOROUGH OF RICHMOND UPON THAMES ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR, CRIME AND POLICING ACT 2014 LONDON BOROUGH OF RICHMOND UPON THAMES PUBLIC SPACES PROTECTION ORDER 2020 (DOG CONTROL) The Council of the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (in this Order called “the Council”) hereby makes the following Order pursuant to Section 59 of the Anti- social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 (“the Act”). This Order may be cited as the “London Borough of Richmond upon Thames Public Spaces Protection Order 2017 (Dog Control)”. This Order came into force on 16 October 2017 and lasted for a period of 3 years from that date. This Order was extended, pursuant to section 60 of the Act, for a period of 3 years from 2020. This Order can be extended pursuant to section 60 of the Act. In this Order the following definitions apply: “Person in charge” means the person who has the dog in his possession, care or company at the time the offence is committed or, if none, the owner or person who habitually has the dog in his possession. “Restricted area” means the land described and/or shown in the maps in the Schedule to this Order. “Authorised officer” means a police officer, PCSO, Council officer, and persons authorised by the Council to enforce this Order. "Assistance dog" means a dog that is trained to aid or assist a disabled person. The masculine includes the feminine. The Offences Article 1 - Dog Fouling If within the restricted area, a dog defecates, at any time, and the person who is in charge of the dog fails to remove the faeces from the restricted area forthwith, that person shall be guilty of an offence unless – a.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiswick Timetable
    TIMETABLE Races 1 to 13 on flood tide; 14 to 91 on ebb tide Race Time Event Competitors Winner Verdict Next (counting from Surrey) race 1 8.30 WJ15 4x+ Latymer Upper School (73) ............................. ...... 9 Barn Elms (74) Kew House School (75) 2 8.35 WJ15 4x+ Team Keane (76) ............................. ...... 9 Putney High School (77) St Paul’s Girls’ Sch (78) 3 8.40 WJ15 4x+ Emanuel School (79) ............................. ...... 9 Sydenham High School (80) Tideway Scullers (81) The winners of the three heats of WJ15 4x+ (races 1 to 3) will stay on the water and straightaway return to the start for the final (race 9) 4 8.45 WJ14 4x+ Barn Elms (82) ............................. ...... 12 King’s Sch Canterbury (83) Emanuel School (84) 5 8.50 WJ14 4x+ Maidenhead (85) ............................. ...... 12 Kew House School (86) 6 8.55 WJ14 4x+ Putney High Sch (Gilligan) (87) ............................ ...... 12 Team Keane (88) The winners of the three heats of WJ14 4x+ (races 4 to 6) will stay on the water and straightaway return to the start for the final (race 12) 7 9.00 Op 4- Poplar Blackwall (29) ............................. ...... – Tier 2 Auriol Kensington (Lecubin) (30) FINAL Sons of the Thames (31) 8 9.05 Op 4- Vesta (26) ............................. ...... – Tier 1 Latymer Upper School (27) FINAL East India Club (28) 9 9.10 WJ15 4x+ Winner of race 1 ............................. ...... FINAL Winner of race 2 Winner of race 3 10 9.15 W 4+ Putney Town (44) ............................. ...... 27 Vesta (Warden) (45) University College London (46) 11 9.20 W 4+ St George’s College (47) ............................
    [Show full text]
  • The Elizabethan Court Day by Day--1589
    1589 1589 At RICHMOND PALACE, Surrey. Jan 1,Wed New Year gifts. Among 185 gifts to the Queen: by Sir Thomas Heneage: ‘One jewel of gold like an Alpha and Omega with sparks of diamonds’; by William Dethick, Garter King of Arms: ‘A Book of Arms of the Noblemen in Henry the Fifth’s time’; by John Smithson, Master Cook: ‘One fair marchpane [marzipan] with St George in the midst’; NYG by Petruccio Ubaldini: ‘A book covered with vellum of Italian. Also Jan 1: play, by the Children of Paul’s.T Jan 1, London, Jean Morel dedicated to the Queen: De Ecclesia ab Antechristo liberanda. [Of the Church, liberated from Anti-Christ]. Epistle to the Queen, praising her for her victories over all enemies, through God’s guidance. Preface to the Reader. Text: 104p. (London, 1589). Jan 1, Thomas Churchyard dedicated to the Queen: ‘A Rebuke to Rebellion’, in verse. [Modern edition: Nichols, Progresses (2014), iii.470-480]. Jan 5: Anthony Bridgeman, of Mitcheldean, Gloucs, to the Queen: ‘Sacred and most gracious Queen may it please your Majesty to accept as a New Year’s gift at the hands of me your most humble poor subject these thirteen branches...to be planted in this your Highness’s garden of England’. Each ‘branch’ being a proposed religious or social reform, including: ‘A restraint of the profaning of the Sabbath Day especially with minstrelsey, baiting of bears and other beasts, and such like’. ‘A restraint of publishing profane poetry, books of profane songs, sonnets, pamphlets and such like’. ‘That there be no book, pamphlet, sonnet, ballad or libel printed or written of purpose either to be sold or openly published without your Majesty’s licence’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Character of the Landscape
    THE CHARACTER OF THE LANDSCAPE The Thames enters the Greater London Area at Hampton. From Hampton to Erith, the river flows through the metropolis; an urban area even though much of the riverside is verdant open space, particularly in the first stretch between Hampton and Kew. The character of the river is wonderfully varied and this chapter concentrates on understanding how that variety works. We have deliberately avoided detailed uniform design guidelines, such as standard building setbacks from the water’s edge. At this level, such guidelines would tend to stifle rather than encourage the variety in character. Instead we have tried to highlight the main factors which determine the landscape character and propose policies to conserve and enhance it. Policy LC 1: New development and new initiatives within the Strategy area should be judged against the paramount aim of conserving and enhancing the unique character of the Thames Landscape as defined in the Strategy. The River Although, being a physical boundary, the river is often on the periphery of county and local authority jurisdictions, it is essentially the centre of the landscape. The Thames has carved the terraces and banks which line its course, the valley sides drain down to its edges and the water acts as the main visual and physical focus. It is a dynamic force, constantly changing with the tide and reflecting the wind and the weather on its surface. KEW SYON Between Hampton and Kew, the Thames is forced around Richmond Hill, flowing from south to north in a series of tight bends. It is not until Putney that the river resumes its gentler rhythm.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding South London's Hedgehog Populations with London
    Understanding South London’s hedgehog populations with London Hogwatch 2020 Kate Scott-Gatty Chris Carbone Key findings • The outlook for South London’s hedgehog populations looks better than originally thought from previous London HogWatch surveys. • The known populations in Barnes Common and Barnes Wetlands seem to be connected and can disperse into surrounding areas which is encouraging for the long term survival of this population. • Barnes Common/Putney Lower had a much lower hedgehog trap rate than in previous years surveys which is potentially worrying as it could indicate a population decline. • Badgers are affecting hedgehog distribution in SW London and gardens are acting as important refuges for hedgehogs in this area. • Twickenham could be a potential hotspot for hedgehogs in SW London as private garden surveys showed a wide distribution in this area. • Beddington park had a lower hedgehog trap rate than the surrounding gardens possibly highlighting a connectivity issue as the park is surrounded by busy roads. This area also had a relatively low trap rate indicating this may be a small and vulnerable population in need of targeted conservation efforts. • Gardens play an important role as habitat for South London’s hedgehogs. Both small and large green spaces need to be surveyed in the future to gain an accurate picture of hedgehog distribution and abundance. Introduction Hedgehogs have recently been classified as vulnerable to extinction in the UK as their numbers are estimated to have declined by 46% in the last 13 years1. The causes of this decline are complicated, as many factors are likely to be interacting to produce this effect.
    [Show full text]