Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 250/Monday, December 31

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 250/Monday, December 31 76916 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 250 / Monday, December 31, 2012 / Rules and Regulations Location and case Date and name of newspaper Effective date of Community State and county No. where notice was published Chief executive officer of community modification No. Texas: Tarrant City of Keller (11– June 24, 2011, July 1, 2011, The Honorable Pat McGrail, Mayor, City October 31, 2011 ........... 480602 (FEMA Docket 06–2181P). The Fort Worth Star-Tele- of Keller, 1100 Bear Creek Parkway, No.: B–1225). gram. Keller, TX 76248. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. ADDRESSES: The final BFEs for each 10, Environmental Consideration. An 97.022, ‘‘Flood Insurance.’’) community are available for inspection environmental impact assessment has at the office of the Chief Executive not been prepared. James A. Walke, Officer of each community. The Regulatory Flexibility Act. As flood Acting Deputy Associate Administrator for respective addresses are listed in the elevation determinations are not within Mitigation, Department of Homeland table below. Security, Federal Emergency Management the scope of the Regulatory Flexibility Agency. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, a regulatory Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering [FR Doc. 2012–31348 Filed 12–28–12; 8:45 am] flexibility analysis is not required. Management Branch, Federal Insurance BILLING CODE 9110–12–P Regulatory Classification. This final and Mitigation Administration, Federal rule is not a significant regulatory action Emergency Management Agency, 500 C under the criteria of section 3(f) of Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND Executive Order 12866 of September 30, (202) 646–4064, or (email) SECURITY 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review, [email protected]. 58 FR 51735. Federal Emergency Management SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Executive Order 13132, Federalism. Agency Federal Emergency Management Agency This final rule involves no policies that (FEMA) makes the final determinations have federalism implications under 44 CFR Part 67 listed below for the modified BFEs for Executive Order 13132. [Docket ID FEMA–2012–0003] each community listed. These modified elevations have been published in Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Final Flood Elevation Determinations newspapers of local circulation and Reform. This final rule meets the ninety (90) days have elapsed since that applicable standards of Executive Order AGENCY: Federal Emergency publication. The Deputy Associate 12988. Management Agency, DHS. Administrator for Mitigation has List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 67 ACTION: Final rule. resolved any appeals resulting from this notification. SUMMARY: Base (1% annual-chance) Administrative practice and This final rule is issued in accordance Flood Elevations (BFEs) and modified procedure, Flood insurance, Reporting with section 110 of the Flood Disaster BFEs are made final for the and recordkeeping requirements. Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4104, communities listed below. The BFEs and 44 CFR part 67. FEMA has Accordingly, 44 CFR part 67 is and modified BFEs are the basis for the developed criteria for floodplain amended as follows: floodplain management measures that management in floodprone areas in each community is required either to PART 67—[AMENDED] accordance with 44 CFR part 60. adopt or to show evidence of being Interested lessees and owners of real ■ already in effect in order to qualify or property are encouraged to review the 1. The authority citation for part 67 remain qualified for participation in the proof Flood Insurance Study and FIRM continues to read as follows: National Flood Insurance Program available at the address cited below for Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; (NFIP). each community. The BFEs and Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978, 3 CFR, DATES: The date of issuance of the Flood modified BFEs are made final in the 1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) showing communities listed below. Elevations at 3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 376. BFEs and modified BFEs for each selected locations in each community § 67.11 [Amended] community. This date may be obtained are shown. by contacting the office where the maps National Environmental Policy Act. ■ 2. The tables published under the are available for inspection as indicated This final rule is categorically excluded authority of § 67.11 are amended as in the table below. from the requirements of 44 CFR part follows: * Elevation in feet (NGVD) + Elevation in feet (NAVD) Flooding source(s) Location of referenced elevation # Depth in feet Communities affected above ground ∧ Elevation in me- ters (MSL) modified Cobb County, Georgia, and Incorporated Areas Docket No.: FEMA–B–1233 Buttermilk Creek ....................... At the Sweetwater Creek confluence .................................. +892 City of Austell, Unincor- porated Areas of Cobb County. VerDate Mar<15>2010 01:38 Dec 29, 2012 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00108 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\31DER1.SGM 31DER1 ebenthall on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 250 / Monday, December 31, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 76917 * Elevation in feet (NGVD) + Elevation in feet (NAVD) Flooding source(s) Location of referenced elevation # Depth in feet Communities affected above ground ∧ Elevation in me- ters (MSL) modified Approximately 1.0 mile upstream of the Sweetwater Creek +892 confluence. Chattahoochee River ................ Approximately 2.9 miles downstream of I–20 ..................... +760 City of Smyrna, Unincor- porated Areas of Cobb County. Approximately 1.8 miles upstream of Morgan Falls Dam ... +861 Concord Creek .......................... At the Nickajack Creek confluence ..................................... +894 Unincorporated Areas of Cobb County. Approximately 720 feet upstream of Auldyn Drive ............. +999 Cooper Lake Creek .................. Approximately 1,200 feet upstream of the Nickajack Creek +825 City of Smyrna, Unincor- confluence. porated Areas of Cobb County. At the upstream side of Gann Road Southeast .................. +892 Favor Creek .............................. At the Nickajack Creek confluence ..................................... +913 Unincorporated Areas of Cobb County. Approximately 1.55 miles upstream of the Nickajack +1001 Creek confluence. Gilmore Creek ........................... At the Chattahoochee River confluence ............................. +774 Unincorporated Areas of Cobb County. Approximately 0.64 mile upstream of the Chattahoochee +774 River confluence. Gothards Creek ........................ At the Sweetwater Creek confluence .................................. +905 Unincorporated Areas of Cobb County. At the Douglas County boundary ........................................ +905 Harmony Grove Creek .............. At the Willeo Creek confluence ........................................... +898 Unincorporated Areas of Cobb County. At the upstream side of Johnson Ferry Road ..................... +1052 Laurel Creek ............................. At the Nickajack Creek confluence ..................................... +802 City of Smyrna, Unincor- porated Areas of Cobb County. Approximately 500 feet upstream of Lee Street Southeast +984 Liberty Hill Branch .................... At the Queen Creek confluence .......................................... +774 Unincorporated Areas of Cobb County. Approximately 0.95 mile upstream of the Queen Creek +911 confluence. Little Noonday Creek ................ At the Noonday Creek confluence ...................................... +905 Unincorporated Areas of Cobb County. Approximately 0.5 mile upstream of the Noonday Creek +905 confluence. Lost Mountain Creek ................ At the Wildhorse Creek confluence .................................... +903 City of Powder Springs, Un- incorporated Areas of Cobb County. Approximately 1,250 feet upstream of Macedonia Road +943 Southwest. Milam Branch ............................ At the Queen Creek confluence .......................................... +904 Unincorporated Areas of Cobb County. Approximately 200 feet upstream of Francis Circle South- +1013 west. Mill Creek No. 2 ........................ At the Nickajack Creek confluence ..................................... +902 Unincorporated Areas of Cobb County. Approximately 150 feet upstream of Hicks Road South- +963 west. Mud Creek ................................ At the Noses Creek confluence .......................................... +908 Unincorporated Areas of Cobb County. Approximately 0.4 mile upstream of the Noses Creek con- +911 fluence. Nickajack Creek ........................ At the Chattahoochee River confluence ............................. +764 City of Smyrna, Unincor- porated Areas of Cobb County. Approximately 200 feet upstream of South Cobb Drive ..... +1049 Noonday Creek ......................... At the Cherokee County boundary ..................................... +895 City of Kennesaw, City of Marietta, Unincorporated Areas of Cobb County. Approximately 350 feet upstream of New Salem Road ..... +1023 Noonday Creek Tributary No. 4 At the Noonday Creek confluence ...................................... +927 Unincorporated Areas of Cobb County. VerDate Mar<15>2010 01:38 Dec 29, 2012 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00109 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\31DER1.SGM 31DER1 ebenthall on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with 76918 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 250 / Monday, December 31, 2012 / Rules and Regulations * Elevation in feet (NGVD) + Elevation in feet (NAVD) Flooding source(s) Location of referenced elevation
Recommended publications
  • Cobb County, Georgia and Incorporated Areas
    VOLUME 1 OF 4 Cobb County COBB COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ACWORTH, CITY OF 130053 AUSTELL, CITY OF 130054 COBB COUNTY 130052 (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) KENNESAW, CITY OF 130055 MARIETTA, CITY OF 130226 POWDER SPRINGS, CITY OF 130056 SMYRNA, CITY OF 130057 REVISED: MARCH 4, 2013 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 13067CV001D NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Initial Countywide FIS Effective Date: August 18, 1992 Revised Countywide FIS Effective Date: December 16, 2008 Revised Countywide FIS Effective Date: March 4, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose of Study 1 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgments 1 1.3 Coordination 3 2.0 AREA STUDIED 5 2.1 Scope of Study 5 2.2 Community Description 10 2.3 Principal Flood Problems
    [Show full text]
  • Total Maximum Daily Load Evaluation for Fifty-Eight Stream Segments in the Coosa River Basin for Fecal Coliform
    Total Maximum Daily Load Evaluation for Fifty-Eight Stream Segments in the Coosa River Basin for Fecal Coliform Submitted to: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia Submitted by: The Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division Atlanta, Georgia January 2004 Total Maximum Daily Load Evaluation January 2004 Coosa River Basin (Fecal coliform) Table of Contents Section Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Watershed Description......................................................................................................1 1.3 Water Quality Standard.....................................................................................................9 2.0 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................... 15 3.0 SOURCE ASSESSMENT .................................................................................................... 16 3.1 Point Source Assessment ............................................................................................... 16 3.2 Nonpoint Source Assessment........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 137 CHAPTER 5 NATURAL RESOURCES ELEMENT What Are
    Chapter 5 Natural Resources Element (June 20, 2005 Draft) 137 Roswell, Georgia, Comprehensive Plan 2025 CHAPTER 5 NATURAL RESOURCES ELEMENT What are the natural features which make a township handsome? A river, with its waterfalls and meadows, a lake, a hill, a cliff or individual rocks, a forest, and ancient trees standing singly. Such things are beautiful; they have a high use which dollars and cents never represent. If the inhabitants of a town were wise, they would seek to preserve these things, though at a considerable expense… Henry David Thoreau, Journal, 1861 (Quoted in Dramstad, Olson, and Forman 1996) The Natural Resources Element provides the City with the opportunity to inventory natural and environmentally sensitive resources; to consider the issues, problems and opportunities associated with those resources; and to develop goals, policies and strategies for their appropriate use, conservation and protection that are consistent with those established for other Plan elements. An assessment of natural resources must be conducted to consider how they can most wisely and responsibly be utilized, developed, managed or preserved in order to yield maximum long- range benefits to the community. The assessment should also consider the potential vulnerability of the community's natural resources to land development and other human activities and evaluate whether protecting them is important to the future health and economic well being of the community. Levels of community support for conservation of various natural resources should also be considered. The results of this assessment should be considered in the development of needs and goals and an associated implementation strategy that sets forth any special treatment or protection to be provided these resources over the planning period.
    [Show full text]
  • Cobb County, Georgia and Incorporated Areas
    VOLUME 4 OF 4 Cobb County COBB COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ACWORTH, CITY OF 130053 AUSTELL, CITY OF 130054 COBB COUNTY 130052 (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) KENNESAW, CITY OF 130055 MARIETTA, CITY OF 130226 POWDER SPRINGS, CITY OF 130056 SMYRNA, CITY OF 130057 REVISED: MARCH 4, 2013 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 13067CV004C NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Initial Countywide FIS Effective Date: August 18, 1992 Revised Countywide FIS Effective Date: December 16, 2008 Revised Countywide FIS Effective Date: March 4, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose of Study 1 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgments 1 1.3 Coordination 3 2.0 AREA STUDIED 5 2.1 Scope of Study 5 2.2 Community Description 10 2.3 Principal Flood Problems
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 229/Tuesday, November 29, 2011
    Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2011 / Proposed Rules 73537 (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. ADDRESSES: The corresponding made final, and for the contents in those 97.022, ‘‘Flood Insurance.’’) preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Map buildings. Dated: November 18, 2011. (FIRM) for the proposed BFEs for each Comments on any aspect of the Flood Sandra K. Knight, community is available for inspection at Insurance Study and FIRM, other than Deputy Associate Administrator for the community’s map repository. The the proposed BFEs, will be considered. Mitigation, Department of Homeland respective addresses are listed in the A letter acknowledging receipt of any Security, Federal Emergency Management table below. comments will not be sent. Agency. You may submit comments, identified National Environmental Policy Act. [FR Doc. 2011–30709 Filed 11–28–11; 8:45 am] by Docket No. FEMA–B–1233, to Luis This proposed rule is categorically BILLING CODE 9110–12–P Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering excluded from the requirements of 44 Management Branch, Federal Insurance CFR part 10, Environmental and Mitigation Administration, Federal Consideration. An environmental DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND Emergency Management Agency, 500 C impact assessment has not been SECURITY Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, prepared. Federal Emergency Management (202) 646–4064, or (email) Regulatory Flexibility Act. As flood Agency [email protected]. elevation determinations are not within the scope of the Regulatory Flexibility FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis 44 CFR Part 67 Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, a regulatory Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering flexibility analysis is not required. [Docket ID FEMA–2011–0002; Internal Management Branch, Federal Insurance Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Agency Docket No.
    [Show full text]
  • 222 CHAPTER 8 URBAN DESIGN ELEMENT Urban Design Has Been
    Chapter 8 Urban Design Element (June 20, 2005 Draft) 222 Roswell, GA, Comprehensive Plan 2025 CHAPTER 8 URBAN DESIGN ELEMENT Urban design has been a key public policy concern in Roswell for more than three decades. The architectural design of development within the Historic District has been reviewed and approved by the Historic Preservation Commission (see Chapter 6 of this Comprehensive Plan), formerly established as an Civic Design Commission before the Historic Preservation Act of 1980. In addition, for more than two decades, a Design Review Board has reviewed the architecture, site design, landscaping. Long before the adoption of design guidelines was the “trendy” thing for proactive municipalities to do, Roswell prepared, adopted, and implemented design guidelines for selected areas of the City. Together, these programs of architectural and site design review have helped Roswell to preserve its past, ensure quality development, and guide its future in a way that maintains and enhances its character. An Urban Design Element is not required by State rules for local planning, but given it’s past emphasis on urban design, Roswell prepared and adopted an Urban Design Element in 2000, as a part of its 2020 Comprehensive Plan. In 2000, the need to recognize all adopted design guidelines was the primary concern of the Urban Design Element. Another concern at that time related to the character and design of the City as a whole. Having divided the City into different design districts, there was some concern that the City and its Design Review Board might be losing sight of its character as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Work Program Appendix 3 Appendix 3 November 2017
    COMMUNITY WORK PROGRAM APPENDIX 3 APPENDIX 3 NOVEMBER 2017 2040 COMMUNITY WORK PROGRAM The purpose of the Community Work Program is to identify specific implementation actions the local government, or other entities, intend to undertake over the course of the next five (5) year planning period. This includes, but is not limited to, new facilities, expansion of facilities, new ordinances, revisions of existing ordinances, administrative actions, community improvements or investments, infrastructure, financing arrangements, or other programs or initiatives to be put in place to implement the plan. To facilitate the division of work among various County Divisions, the community work program is segmented by the following elements: Land Use, Transportation, Housing, Community Facilities, Natural and Historic Resources, Human Services, Economic Development, Public Safety, Disaster Resilience, Intergovernmental Coordination, Military Compatibility, and Place-Making. The following are abbreviations that are used throughout the Community Work Program ACFB Atlanta Community Food Bank EMA Emergency Management Agency ACS American Cancer Society ESG Emergency Solutions Grant AHA American Heart Association GDOT Georgia Department of Transportation ALA American Lung Association HOME Home Investment Partnership Act ARC Atlanta Regional Commission HPC Historic Preservation Commission BOC Board of Commissioners IS Information Services CAO County Attorney’s Office KCB Keep Cobb Beautiful CCES Cobb County Extension Services KSU Kennesaw State University CCID
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive System-Wide Recreation Master Plan 2001 - 2010
    COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEM-WIDE RECREATION MASTER PLAN 2001 - 2010 For The CITY OF ROSWELL RECREATION COMMISSION JANUARY 2001 Prepared By ROBERT G. BETZ AICP, INC. Lilburn, Georgia INTRODUCTION The Roswell recreation system is an excellent example of what can be accomplished through the application of sound planning principles, the timely expenditure of acquisition and development dollars and the exercise of diligence in system-wide operation and maintenance practices. It is truly one of the finest systems in the southeastern United States. This, the Comprehensive System-Wide Recreation Master Plan is the fifth update to the original Action Plan for Recreation, prepared in 1969. With the exception of the 1992 Update to the Master Recreation Plan that covered an eight-year period, updates have been prepared at roughly five-year intervals. Each update has focused on the identification of land acquisition needs, making improvements to existing parks and facilities and establishing development priorities for new parks. A system-wide recreation master plan is an expression of a community's objectives, needs and priorities for leisure space, facilities, programs and service delivery. As such, it provides guidance for municipal policy formulation and the decision-making process as relates to the quality and location of recreation opportunities. It is therefore the intent of the 2000 Update to the Master Recreation Plan to accurately reflect community desires while presenting imaginative new recreational opportunities that are both functional and realistic and practical to implement. The preparation of the Comprehensive System-Wide Recreation Master Plan (the 2000 Plan) encompasses the ten-year period beginning in fiscal year 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • HUC-8, HUC-10, HUC-12 Hierarchy
    Attachment 10: Metro Water District HUC-8, HUC-10, HUC-12 Hierarchy River System Major River Basin HUC‐8 River Basin HUC‐8 # HUC‐10 Name HUC‐10 # HUC‐12 Name HUC‐12 # Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint (ACF) Chattahoochee Upper Chattahoochee River 3130001 Chattahoochee River‐Mossy Creek 313000103 White Creek‐Chattahoochee River 31300010301 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint (ACF) Chattahoochee Upper Chattahoochee River 3130001 Chattahoochee River‐Mossy Creek 313000103 Mossy Creek 31300010302 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint (ACF) Chattahoochee Upper Chattahoochee River 3130001 Chattahoochee River‐Mossy Creek 313000103 Mud Creek 31300010303 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint (ACF) Chattahoochee Upper Chattahoochee River 3130001 Chattahoochee River‐Mossy Creek 313000103 Flat Creek‐Chattahoochee River 31300010304 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint (ACF) Chattahoochee Upper Chattahoochee River 3130001 Chattahoochee River‐Mossy Creek 313000103 Limestone Creek‐Lake Sidney Lanier 31300010305 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint (ACF) Chattahoochee Upper Chattahoochee River 3130001 Little River‐Wahoo Creek 313000104 Wahoo Creek 31300010401 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint (ACF) Chattahoochee Upper Chattahoochee River 3130001 Little River‐Wahoo Creek 313000104 West Fork Little River 31300010402 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint (ACF) Chattahoochee Upper Chattahoochee River 3130001 Little River‐Wahoo Creek 313000104 East Fork Little River 31300010403 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint (ACF) Chattahoochee Upper
    [Show full text]
  • Roswell City Comprehensive Plan Community Assessment 2010
    Community Assessment DRAFT September 30, 201 0 Ce Community Assessment Comprehensive Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………...……..i People………………………………………………………………………………………...…………...I Land Use…………………………………………………………………………………...…………......II Economic Development……………………………………………………………………………...III Housing……………………………………………………………………………………...…………...IV Natural and Cultural Resources………………………………………...……………...…………....V Community Facilities…………………………………………………………..………...……………VI Intergovernmental Coordination……………………………………………………...…………...VII Transportation……………………………………………………………….…………...…………...VIII Quality Community Objectives…………………………………………………………………......IX Technical Appendix Attached Community Assessment Comprehensive Plan INTRODUCTION: ROSWELL TODAY AND TRENDS FOR TOMORROW During 2010 and 2011, the City of Roswell will undertake updating its Comprehensive Plan and plan to the year 2030. Different stakeholders will be considering a variety of questions: What can we anticipate regarding the environment, the economy and our infrastructure systems in the future? Who are we today and who are our neighbors? How do we live, work and move in and around our communities and the region? Who will our neighbors be in 20 years and what will our different needs be then? The Community Assessment and its Technical Appendix presents key data and information to help answer these kinds of questions, so that the City of Roswell’s community members and other stakeholders can prepare a vision and a 20-year plan for the future. As part of
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Flooding in Georgia, 2009
    Prepared in cooperation with the Georgia Department of Transportation Preconstruction Division Office of Bridge Design Historic Flooding in Georgia, 2009 OOpen-File Report 2010–12300 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Powder Springs Creek at Powder Springs, Cobb County, Georgia, September 21, 2009. Photo by Brian E. McCallum, USGS. Historic Flooding in Georgia, 2009 By Anthony J. Gotvald Prepared in cooperation with the Georgia Department of Transportation Preconstruction Division Office of Bridge Design Open-File Report 2010–1230 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Gotvald, A.J., 2010, Historic flooding in Georgia, 2009: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area Historic Resource Study
    Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area Historic Resource Study February 2007 written by Marti Gerdes and Scott Messer additional material by Tommy Jones edited by Jody Cook and Tommy Jones The historic resource study presented here exists in two formats. A traditional, printed version is available for study at the park, the Southeast Regional Office of the NPS (SERO), and at a variety of other repositories. For more widespread access, this historic resource study also exists in a web- based format through the web site of the National Park Service. Please visit www.nps.gov for more information. Cultural Resources Division Southeast Regional Office National Park Service 100 Alabama Street, SW Atlanta, GA 30303 404.562.3117 Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area 1978 Island Ford Parkway Atlanta, GA 30350-3400 http://www.nps.gov/chat About the cover: The front cover shows a photograph of Jones Bridge taken in 2006 by Tommy H. Jones. The rear cover shows a collection of images including, top left, a view of Roswell Mill, courtesy of Roswell Historical Society; center right and left, three historic postcard views of the river from the collection of Jody Cook; and, bottom, a view of the James Power House, from the Vanishing Georgia Collection, Georgia Department of Archives and History. Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area Historic Resource Study Table of Contents Foreword - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ix Introduction Study Purpose and Scope - - - - - - - - - -
    [Show full text]