DOCSLIB.ORG

Administrative Law Notes Pdf in Hindi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Administrative Law Notes Pdf in Hindi Administrative law notes pdf in hindi Continue Industry law governing administrative agencies This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding quotes to reliable sources. Non-sources of materials can be challenged and removed. Find sources: Administrative Law - News newspaper book scientist JSTOR (December 2012) (Find out how and when to remove this template message) Administrative Law General Principles Administrative Court Delegated legislation Exhaustion remedies Legitimate expectations Ministerial Act Natural Justice Weeking Doctrine Ouster provision Patently unreasonable polycentricity prerogative order Certi Orari Habeas corpus Mandamus Prohibition of the quo warrant Rule Ultra vires Administrative Law incommon jurisdictions Australia Canada Singapore South Africa United Kingdom Scotland Administrative Law United States Incivil jurisdictions China Mongolia Ukraine Related topics of Constitutional The Judicial Review vte Administrative Law is the body of law that regulates the activities of the administrative authorities. Government agencies may take legal action, rule-making, decision-making or enforcement of a specific regulatory agenda. Administrative law is considered an industry of public law. Administrative law concerns decision-making by administrative units of the Government, such as tribunals, councils or commissions, which are part of the national regulatory system in areas such as policing, international trade, manufacturing, the environment, taxation, broadcasting, immigration and transport. Administrative law expanded significantly during the twentieth century, as legislatures around the world created more government agencies to regulate the social, economic and political spheres of human interaction. Civil law countries often have specialized administrative courts that review these decisions. In civil law countries, the basic article: The Administrative Court, unlike most civil jurisdictions, most civil law jurisdictions have specialized courts or sections to deal with administrative cases, which would normally apply procedural rules specifically designed for such cases and as opposed to those that apply in private litigation, such as contract or tort claims. Brazil's administrative cases in Brazil are generally dealt with either by federal courts (on matters relating to the Federal Union) or by state treasury units of state courts (in matters relating to states). In 1998, a constitutional reform led by the Government of President Fernando Henrique Cardoso introduced executive branch. Since 1988, Brazilian administrative law has been strongly influenced by the judicial interpretation of the constitutional principles of public administration (Article 37 of the Federal Constitution): legality, lawlessness, publicity of administrative acts, acts, efficiency. Chile Home Article: Chile Law - Administrative Law In Chile, the President of the Republic performs an administrative function in cooperation with several ministries or other authorities with a ministerial rank. Each ministry has one or more under-secretary who performs through public services the actual satisfaction of public needs. There is no specialized court to deal with claims against administrative entities, and instead there are several specialized courts and review procedures. China (PRC) Main article: Administrative law in the Administrative Law of the People's Republic of China in the People's Republic of China was virtually absent until the era of economic reforms initiated by Deng Xiaoping. Since the 1980s, the People's Republic of China has established a new legal framework for administrative law by establishing mechanisms to control the bureaucracy and disciplinary committees of the Chinese Communist Party. However, many argue that the usefulness of these laws is totally inadequate in terms of monitoring the government's actions, mainly because of institutional and systemic obstacles such as a weak judicial system, ill-trained judges and lawyers, and corruption. In 1990, the Administrative ⾏政检 查条例 (⾏政复议条例) Regulations and the Administrative Review Regulations (⾏政复议条例) were enacted. The 1993 Interim Civil Officer Regulations (z家公务员暂⾏条例) changed the way government officials were elected and promoted, requiring them to take exams annually and to introduce a rotation system. These three rules have been changed and changed to laws. In 1994, the State Compensation Act (z家赔偿法 was passed, followed by the Administrative Penalties (⾏政处罚法) Act 1996. The administrative and binding law was introduced in 2012. The Administrative Offences Act was amended in 2014. The General Administrative Procedure Act is currently being drafted. The main article of France: droit administratif en France (in French) In France, most of the claims against national or local authorities, as well as lawsuits against private bodies providing public services, are considered by the administrative courts, which use Conseil d'tat (State Council) as a court of last resort for both ordinary and special courts. The main administrative courts are the administrators of tribunaux, and the appellate courts are cours administratives d'appel. Special administrative courts include the National Court of Asylum, as well as the military, medical and judicial disciplinary bodies. The French administrative law authority is called droit administratif. On in its history, the administrative courts of France have developed an extensive and consistent case (constant of jurisprudence) and legal doctrine (principles g'an'raux du droit and principes fondamentaux fondaauxaux often before similar concepts were enshrined in constitutional and legal texts. These principles include: The right to a fair trial (droit a la d'd'd'ense), including for internal disciplinary bodies The right to challenge any administrative decision in the Administrative Court (droit au recours) 6. Equal access to public employment (Galita d'Akke a la phoncia publique) without taking into account the political views of the Freedom Association (Freedom Association) , lit. Freedom of Trade and Industry) The right to legal certainty (Droit a la s'curit' juridique) French administrative law, which is the founder of continental administrative law, has a strong influence on administrative legislation in a number of other countries such as Belgium, Greece, Turkey and Tunisia. This section needs to be expanded. You can help by adding to it. (June 2008) Germany's German administrative law is called Verwaltungsrecht, which usually governs the relationship between the authorities and citizens. It establishes the rights and obligations of citizens in relation to the authorities. It is part of public law that concerns the organization, tasks and actions of public administration. It also contains rules, regulations, regulations and decisions created and related to administrative institutions such as federal agencies, federal government, city administrations, and reception offices and fiscal authorities, etc. The principle of the rule of law, which means that there is no action against the law and does not act without the law. The principle of legal security, which includes the principle of legal certainty and the principle of non-retrophy Principle of proportionality, which states that the act of the body must be appropriate, necessary and appropriate, the administrative law in Germany can be divided into general administrative law and special administrative law. General Administrative Law General Administration Law is essentially conditioned in the Administrative Procedures Act (Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz VwVfG). Other legal sources are the Administrative Courts Rules (Verwaltungsgerichtsordnung (VwGO), the Social Security Code (Sozialgesetzbuch) and the General Financial Act (Abgabenordnung (AO). It serves the purpose of ensuring the treatment of public authorities in accordance with the law. VwVfG is mainly applied to all public administration activities of federal agencies, as well as federal government agencies, in the event of a federal law. One of the central provisions is No. 35 VwVfG. It defines the administrative act, the most common form of action in which public administration occurs against a citizen. The definition in No. 35 14 says the administration's act is characterized by the following characteristics: It is the official act of 15 authority 16 in the field of public law to resolve the individual case 18 with effect to the outside. 36 - 39, No. 58 - 59 and No. 80 VwV-fG rule the structure and necessary elements of the administrative act. These paragraphs list the prerequisites for the buyout of the illegal act of management (No. 48 VwVfG) and the abolition of the legal act of management (No. 49 VwVfG). Other legal sources of Administrative Procedure (Verwaltungsgerichtsordnung (VwGO), which was adopted in 1960, manage judicial procedures in the administrative court. VwGO is divided into five parts, which are the constitution of the courts, actions, remedies and retrials, costs and enforcement15 and final provisions and interim measures. In the absence of a rule, VwGO is supplemented by a civil justice code (Sivilprossordung PPO) and an act of shipbuilding (Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz (GVG). VwVfG also provides legal protection in administrative law outside of litigation. 68 VwVGO manages a pre-production called Vorverfahren or Widerspruchsverfahren, which is a strict condition for administrative procedure if a waiver or manusal injunction against the authorities is filed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Quest for Legitimacy in American Administrative Law
    The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law CUA Law Scholarship Repository Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions Faculty Scholarship 2007 The Quest for Legitimacy in American Administrative Law Marshall J. Breger The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/scholar Recommended Citation Marshall J. Breger, The Quest for Legitimacy in American Administrative Law, 40 ISRAEL L. REV. 72 (2007). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions by an authorized administrator of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE QUEST FOR LEGITIMACY IN AMERICAN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW MarshallJ. Breger* In the United States, administrativelaw suffers from a perceived lack of legitimacy largely due to a lack of democratic accountability or what some have called a democratic deficit. These misgivings stem, in part,from a deep-seated American distrust of bureaucracy. This Article examines how the quest for legitimacy has led practitioners (and theorists) of administrative law to undertakefour interrelatedprojects: the Accountability Project, the Rationality Project, the TransparencyProject, and the ParticipatoryProject all designed to create a substitute or shadowform of democratic legitimacy. Through an examination of these projects, I clarify how they try to address
    [Show full text]
  • The Citizen's Relief Against Inactive Federal Officials: Case Studies in Mandamus, Actions "In the Nature of Mandamus," and Mandatory Injunctions
    The University of Akron IdeaExchange@UAkron Akron Law Review Akron Law Journals July 2015 The itC izen's Relief Against Inactive Federal Officials: Case Studies in Mandamus, Actions "In The aN ture of Mandamus," and Mandatory Injuctions Howard W. Brill Please take a moment to share how this work helps you through this survey. Your feedback will be important as we plan further development of our repository. Follow this and additional works at: https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview Part of the Civil Procedure Commons, and the Litigation Commons Recommended Citation Brill, Howard W. (1983) "The itC izen's Relief Against Inactive Federal Officials: Case Studies in Mandamus, Actions "In The aN ture of Mandamus," and Mandatory Injuctions," Akron Law Review: Vol. 16 : Iss. 3 , Article 1. Available at: https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview/vol16/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Akron Law Journals at IdeaExchange@UAkron, the institutional repository of The nivU ersity of Akron in Akron, Ohio, USA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Akron Law Review by an authorized administrator of IdeaExchange@UAkron. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Brill: Relief Against Inactive Officials THE CITIZEN'S RELIEF AGAINST INACTIVE FEDERAL OFFICIALS: CASE STUDIES IN MANDAMUS, ACTIONS "IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS," AND MANDATORY INJUNCTIONS by HOWARD W. BRILL* I. INTRODUCTION: THE PROBLEMS N RESPONSE TO citizen pressure and perceived need legislative bodies have enacted statutes prescribing specific legislative standards designed to pro- tect the public. The scope of these statutes has required a corresponding growth of the administrative process.
    [Show full text]
  • Article II US Constitution
    ARTICLE II EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT CONTENTS Page Section 1. The President ........................................................................................................... 413 Clause 1. Powers and Term of the President ................................................................... 413 Nature and Scope of Presidential Power ................................................................... 413 Creation of the Presidency .................................................................................. 413 Executive Power: Theory of the Presidential Office .......................................... 415 Hamilton and Madison ................................................................................. 416 The Myers Case ............................................................................................. 418 The Curtiss-Wright Case .............................................................................. 418 The Youngstown Case ................................................................................... 420 The Practice in the Presidential Office ....................................................... 422 Executive Power: Separation-of-Powers Judicial Protection ............................ 422 Tenure .......................................................................................................................... 425 Clauses 2, 3 and 4. Election .............................................................................................. 426 Electoral College .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Article the Puzzling Presumption of Reviewability
    VOLUME 127 MARCH 2014 NUMBER 5 © 2014 by The Harvard Law Review Association ARTICLE THE PUZZLING PRESUMPTION OF REVIEWABILITY Nicholas Bagley CONTENTS I. THE MODERN PRESUMPTION ........................................................................................ 1289 II. JUSTIFICATIONS FOR THE PRESUMPTION .................................................................. 1294 A. History .............................................................................................................................. 1294 B. The Administrative Procedure Act ............................................................................... 1303 C. The Constitution ............................................................................................................. 1309 1. The Nondelegation Doctrine .................................................................................... 1310 2. Article III .................................................................................................................... 1312 3. Procedural Due Process ............................................................................................ 1316 D. Background Values .......................................................................................................... 1318 E. A Stable Interpretive Backdrop ..................................................................................... 1327 III. IMPLICATIONS ..................................................................................................................... 1329
    [Show full text]
  • The Puzzling Presumption of Reviewability Nicholas Bagley University of Michigan Law School, [email protected]
    University of Michigan Law School University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository Articles Faculty Scholarship 2014 The Puzzling Presumption of Reviewability Nicholas Bagley University of Michigan Law School, [email protected] Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/articles/1176 Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/articles Part of the Administrative Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, Legal History Commons, Legislation Commons, and the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Recommended Citation Bagley, Nicholas. "The uzP zling Presumption of Reviewability." Harv. L. Rev. 127, no. 5 (2014): 1285-340. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VOLUME 127 MARCH 2014 NUMBER 5 HARVARD LAW REVIEW I @ 2014 by The Harvard Law Review Association ARTICLE THE PUZZLING PRESUMPTION OF REVIEWABILITY Nicholas Bagley CONTENTS I. THE M ODERN PRESUM PTION ........................................................................................ 1289 II. JUSTIFICATIONS FOR THE PRESUMPTION..................................................................1294 A . H istory .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]