DOCSLIB.ORG

Anecdotal List of Public Interest Judges Compiled by the Harvard

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Anecdotal List of Public Interest Judges Compiled by the Harvard Anecdotal List of Public Interest Judges as of 11/3/17 Compiled by the Harvard Law School Office of Career Services and Office of Public Interest Advising. CONFIDENTIAL - for HLS Applicants Only Type Cir Dist City State Judge Last Judge First Notes Circuit 01 Boston MA Barron David OLC Circuit 01 Concord NH Howard Jeffrey Circuit 01 Portland ME Lipez Kermit Circuit 01 Boston MA Lynch Sandra Worked at Harvard Legal Aid Bureau; started career in legal aid and Circuit 01 Providence RI Thompson O. Rogeree family law Circuit 02 New Haven CT Carney Susan Former Yale and Peace Corps GC Has partnered with Judge Katzmann on immigration representation Circuit 02 New York NY Chin Denny project Circuit 02 New York NY Katzmann Robert Circuit 02 New York NY Livingston Debra AUSA Worked as cooperating attorney with ACLU and New York Civil Circuit 02 New York NY Lynch Gerard Liberties Union Circuit 02 New York NY Parker Barrington Circuit 02 Syracuse NY Pooler Rosemary Circuit 02 New York NY Sack Robert Circuit 02 New York NY Straub Chester Circuit 02 Geneseo NY Wesley Richard Circuit 03 Newark NJ Trump Barry Maryanne Circuit 03 Newark NJ Chagares Michael Circuit 03 Newark NJ Fuentes Julio Circuit 03 Newark NJ Greenaway Joseph Circuit 03 Philadelphia PA Krause Cheryl AUSA Circuit 03 Philadelphia PA McKee Theodore Circuit 03 Philadelphia PA Rendell Marjorie Circuit 03 Philadelphia PA Restrepo Luis Felipe ACLU National Prison Project; Former Federal Public Defender Circuit 03 Scranton PA Vanaskie Thomas Circuit 04 Raleigh NC Duncan Allyson Circuit 04 Richmond VA Gregory Roger Circuit 04 Silver Spring MD Harris Pamela OLC Circuit 04 Baltimore MD Motz Diana Circuit 05 Houston TX Costa Gregg AUSA Circuit 05 New Orleans LA Dennis James Circuit 05 Jackson MS Graves James Central Mississippi Legal Services; MS AG Health Law Division Circuit 05 Houston TX Jones Edith Hollan Circuit 05 San Antonio TX Prado Edward Circuit 05 Shreveport LA Stewart Carl Circuit 06 Memphis TN Donald Bernice Public Defender Circuit 06 Memphis TN Gibbons Julia Circuit 06 Memphis TN Gilman Ronald Circuit 06 Cleveland OH Moore Karen Circuit 06 London KY Siler Eugene Circuit 06 Nashville TN Stranch Jane Worked in labor and employment law Circuit 06 Columbus OH Sutton Jeffrey Circuit 07 Chicago IL Wood Diane Circuit 08 Cedar Rapids IA Kelly Jane Louise Public Defender Circuit 08 Minneapolis MN Loken James Circuit 08 Minneapolis MN Murphy Diana Circuit 09 San Francisco CA Berzon Marsha Circuit 09 Honolulu HI Clifton Richard Circuit 09 Seattle WA Farris Jerome Circuit 09 San Francisco CA Fisher Raymond Page 1 of 6 Anecdotal List of Public Interest Judges as of 11/3/17 Compiled by the Harvard Law School Office of Career Services and Office of Public Interest Advising. CONFIDENTIAL - for HLS Applicants Only Type Cir Dist City State Judge Last Judge First Notes Circuit 09 Portland OR Graber Susan Circuit 09 Phoenix AZ Murguia Mary Circuit 09 Pasadena CA Nelson Dorothy Circuit 09 San Diego CA Owens John AUSA Circuit 09 Pasadena CA Paez Richard Circuit 09 Los Angeles CA Reinhardt Stephen Circuit 09 Pasadena CA Tashima A. Wallace Circuit 10 Denver CO Lucero Carlos Circuit 10 Lawrence KS Moritz Nancy AUSA Circuit 10 Cheyenne WY Phillips Gregory AUSA; Wyoming AG Circuit 11 Atlanta GA Carnes Julie AUSA Circuit 11 Atlanta GA Martin Beverly Circuit DC Washington DC Brown Janice R. Background in government Circuit DC Washington DC Garland Merrick Background in government Circuit DC Washington DC Millett Patricia SG Circuit DC Washington DC Pillard Cornelia OLC; NAACP LDF Circuit DC Washington DC Rogers Judith Background in government Circuit DC Washington DC Srinivasan Sri SG Pro bono work in civil rights. Has hired HLS students with public Circuit DC Washington DC Tatel David interest resumes. Circuit DC Washington DC Wilkins Robert PDS Circuit FED Washington DC Bryson William Circuit FED Washington DC Prost Sharon District 01 MA Boston MA Burroughs Allison AUSA District 01 MA Springfield MA Mastroianni Mark DA District 01 MA Springfield MA Ponsor Michael District 01 MA Boston MA Saris Patti District 01 MA Boston MA Saylor F. Dennis District 01 MA Boston MA Sorokin Leo AFPD District 01 MA Boston MA Talwani Indira Altshuler Berzon District 01 MA Boston MA Wolf Mark See post in OSCAR District 01 MA Boston MA Young William G. District 01 MA Boston MA Zobel Rya District 01 NH Concord NH Barbadoro Paul J. District 01 NH Concord NH McCafferty Landya Public Defender District 02 CT New Haven CT Arterton Janet District 02 CT Bridgeport CT Bolden Victor LDF; ACLU District 02 CT Bridgeport CT Hall Janet District 02 CT New Haven CT Meyer Jeffrey AUSA; Legal Aid District 02 CT Hartford CT Thompson Alvin District 02 NYE Central Islip NY Azrack Joan AUSA District 02 NYE Brooklyn NY Chen Pamela Ki Mai DOJ Civil Rights District 02 NYE Brooklyn NY Donnelly Ann Manhattan DA District 02 NYE Brooklyn NY Gershon Nina District 02 NYE Brooklyn NY Johnson Sterling District 02 NYE Brooklyn NY Ross Allyne Worked at Boston Legal Assistant Project District 02 NYN Albany NY Kahn Lawrence District 02 NYN Syracuse NY Sannes Brenda AUSA District 02 NYS New York NY Abrams Ronnie Federal prosecutor; became Special Counsel for pro bono at firm District 02 NYS New York NY Broderick Vernon AUSA District 02 NYS New York NY Buchwald Naomi District 02 NYS New York NY Caproni Valerie GC of FBI;SEC Page 2 of 6 Anecdotal List of Public Interest Judges as of 11/3/17 Compiled by the Harvard Law School Office of Career Services and Office of Public Interest Advising. CONFIDENTIAL - for HLS Applicants Only Type Cir Dist City State Judge Last Judge First Notes Legal Aid Society; Federal Defender Division; Criminal Defense District 02 NYS New York NY Carter, Jr. Andrew L. Division; Federal Defenders of NY District 02 NYS New York NY Gardephe Paul Chief of Criminal Ap. at SDNY. District 02 NYS New York NY Griesa Thomas District 02 NYS New York NY Kaplan Lewis Presided over first Guantanomo case in civilian court District 02 NYS New York NY Koeltl John District 02 NYS New York NY Marrero Victor DOJ Office of Legal Counsel; White House Counsel; Second openly District 02 NYS New York NY Oetken Paul gay Art. III judge District 02 NYS New York NY Rakoff Jed District 02 NYS White Plains NY Roman Nelson ADA District 02 NYS New York NY Swain Laura See post in OSCAR District 02 NYS New York NY Sweet Robert W. District 02 NYS New York NY Woods Gregory DOJ Civil; DOT Deputy GC; DOE GC District 02 VT Burlington VT Sessions William District 03 NJ Newark NJ Salas Esther Federal Public Defender District 03 NJ Camden NJ Simandle Jerome District 03 NJ Newark NJ Vasquez John AUSA District 03 PAE Philadelphia PA Brody Anita District 03 PAE Philadelphia PA Dubois Janet District 03 PAE Philadelphia PA Pappert Gerald PA AG Quiñones District 03 PAE Philadelphia PA Nitza Community Legal Services (PA); Veterans Affairs Attorney Alejandro District 03 PAE Philadelphia PA Savage Timothy District 03 PAE Philadelphia PA Schiller Berle District 03 PAE Easton PA Smith Edward JAG District 04 ILN Chicago IL Shah Manish AUSA District 04 MD Baltimore MD Blake Catherine District 04 MD Greenbelt MD Chuang Theodore DOJ Civil Rights; AUSA; Deputy GC of DHS District 04 MD Greenbelt MD Hazel George AUSA District 04 MD Greenbelt MD Xinis Paula AFPD District 04 NCM Winston-Salem NC Biggs Loretta AUSA District 04 SC Greenville SC Hendricks Bruce AUSA District 04 VAE Alexandria VA Brinkema Leonie District 04 VAE Richmond VA Lauck Hannah AUSA District 04 VAW Lynchburg VA Moon Norman District 04 WVS Beckley WV Burger Irene Legal Aid Society of Greater Charleston District 04 WVS Huntington WV Chambers Robert Interested in environmental issues District 05 LAE New Orleans LA Barbier Carl District 05 LAE New Orleans LA Fallon Eldon District 05 TXN Dallas TX Lynn Barbara M.G. District 05 TXS Houston TX Ellison Keith District 05 TXS Laredo TX Kazen George District 05 TXS Laredo TX Marmolejo Marina Public Defender District 05 TXW El Paso TX Guaderrama David Campos Chief Public Defender of El Paso County District 05 TXW San Antonio TX Pitman Robert US Attorney of WD Tex District 06 KYW Louisville KY Hale David AUSA District 06 MIE Ann Arbor MI Levy Judith EEOC; AUSA District 06 MIE Detroit MI Parker Linda AUSA; Dir. of MI. Dept. of Civil Rights District 06 OHN Cleveland OH Gwin James District 06 OHS Columbus OH Marbley Algernon District 06 TNM Nashville TN Nixon John Page 3 of 6 Anecdotal List of Public Interest Judges as of 11/3/17 Compiled by the Harvard Law School Office of Career Services and Office of Public Interest Advising. CONFIDENTIAL - for HLS Applicants Only Type Cir Dist City State Judge Last Judge First Notes District 06 TNW Memphis TN Lipman Sheryl GC of University of Memphis District 07 ILC Urbana IL Bruce Colin AUSA District 07 ILC Peoria IL Shadid James Public Defender District 07 ILN Chicago IL Alonso Jorge Public Defender District 07 ILN Chicago IL Blakey John AUSA District 07 ILN Chicago IL Bucklo Elaine District 07 ILN Chicago IL Ellis Sara AFPD; Chicago Law Department District 07 ILN Chicago IL Kennelly Matthew See post in OSCAR District 07 ILN Chicago IL Lee John DOJ Environmental and Natural Resources Division District 07 ILN Chicago IL Shadur Milton District 07 ILN Chicago IL Wood Andrea SEC District 07 ILS Benton IL Yandle Staci US Commission on Civil Rights District 07 WIE Milwaukee WI Pepper Pamela AUSA District 08 IAS Des Moines IA Ebinger Rebecca AUSA District 08 IAS Davenport IA Jarvey John District 08 MN St.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Master of Laws
    APPLYING FOR & FINANCING YOUR LLM MASTER OF LAWS APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS APPLICATION CHECKLIST Admission to the LLM program is highly For applications to be considered, they must include the following: competitive. To be admitted to the program, ALL APPLICANTS INTERNATIONAL APPLICANTS applicants must possess the following: • Application & Application Fee – apply • Applicants with Foreign Credentials - For electronically via LLM.LSAC.ORG, and pay applicants whose native language is not • A Juris Doctor (JD) degree from an ABA-accredited non-refundable application fee of $75 English and who do not posses a degree from law school or an equivalent degree (a Bachelor of Laws • Official Transcripts: all undergraduate and a college or university whose primary language or LL.B.) from a law school outside the United States. graduate level degrees of instruction is English, current TOEFL or IELTS • Official Law School or Equivalent Transcripts scores showing sufficient proficiency in the • For non-lawyers interested in the LLM in Intellectual • For non-lawyer IP professionals: proof of English language is required. The George Mason Property (IP) Law: a Bachelor’s degree and a Master’s minimum of four years professional experience University Scalia Law School Institution code degree in another field, accompanied by a minimum in an IP-related field is 5827. of four years work experience in IP may be accepted in • 500-Word Statement of Purpose • TOEFL: Minimum of 90 in the iBT test lieu of a law degree. IP trainees and Patent Examiners • Resume (100 or above highly preferred) OR (including Bengoshi) with four or more years of • Letters of Recommendation (2 required) • IELTS: Minimum of 6.5 (7.5 or above experience in IP are welcome to apply.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Public Health and Law Programs
    JOINT PUBLIC HEALTH AND LAW tuition rate and fees are charged for semesters when no Law School courses are taken, including summer sessions. PROGRAMS Visit the Hirsh Program website (http://publichealth.gwu.edu/ Program Contact: J. Teitelbaum programs/joint-jdllm-mphcertificate/) for additional information. The Milken Institute of School of Public Health (SPH), through its Hirsh Health Law and Policy Program, cooperates with the REQUIREMENTS Law School to offer public health and law students multiple programs that foster an interdisciplinary approach to the study MPH requirements in the joint degree programs of health policy, health law, public health, and health care. The course of study for the standalone MPH degree, in one of Available joint programs include the master of public health several focus areas, (http://publichealth.gwu.edu/node/766/) (http://bulletin.gwu.edu/public-health/#graduatetext) (MPH) consists of 45 credits, including a supervised practicum. In the and juris doctor (https://www.law.gwu.edu/juris-doctor/) (JD); dual degree programs with the Law School, the Milken Institute MPH and master of laws (https://www.law.gwu.edu/master- School of Public Health (GWSPH) accepts 8 Law School credits of-laws/) (LLM); and JD or LLM and SPH certificate in various toward completion of the MPH degree. Therefore, Juris doctor subject areas. LLM students may be enrolled in either the (JD) and master of laws (LLM) students in the dual program general or environmental law program at the Law School. complete only 37 credits of coursework through GWSPH to obtain an MPH degree. Application of credits between programs Depending upon the focus area in which a JD student chooses For the JD/MPH, 8 JD credits are applied toward the MPH and to study, as a rule, the joint degree can be earned in three- up to 12 MPH credits may be applied toward the JD.
    [Show full text]
  • AFRA AFSHARIPOUR University of California, Davis, School of Law
    AFRA AFSHARIPOUR University of California, Davis, School of Law 400 Mrak Hall Drive, Davis, California 95616 (530) 754-0111 (work) • [email protected] _________________________________________________________________________________________ ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS, SCHOOL OF LAW Davis, CA Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs July 2018-present Professor of Law (Acting Professor of Law July 2007-June 2012) July 2007-present Courses: Business Associations, Mergers and Acquisitions, Startups & Venture Capital, Corporate Governance, Antitrust, Business Planning Research: Comparative Corporate Law, Corporate Governance, Mergers and Acquisitions, Securities Regulation, Transactional Law RESEARCH AND VISITING POSITIONS CHINA UNIVERSITY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AND LAW (CUPL) Beijing, China Visiting Scholar – Legal Experts Forum May 2019 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY, SCHOOL OF LAW Berkeley, CA Visiting Fellow, Berkeley Center for Law, Business and the Economy (BCLBE) August 2016-May 2017 NATIONAL CHIAO-TUNG UNIVERSITY Hsinchu City, Taiwan Visiting Scholar January 2017 NATIONAL LAW SCHOOL OF INDIA UNIVERSITY Bangalore, India Visiting Scholar June 2010 OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL New York, NY and Menlo Park, CA Associate Summer 1998, October 2000-July 2007 Corporate: Advised clients on domestic and cross border mergers and acquisitions, public and private securities offerings, corporate governance and compliance matters, and bank regulatory matters. Pro Bono: Awarded State Bar
    [Show full text]
  • How Not to Succeed in Law School
    Essays How Not to Succeed in Law School James D. Gordon HIIt I. SHOULD You Go TO LAW SCHOOL? Would you like to help the less fortunate? Would you like to see liberty and justice for all? Do you want to vindicate the rights of the oppressed? If so, you should join the Peace Corps. The last thing you should do is attend law school. People basically hate lawyers, and with good reason. That's why you'll rarely escape from a dinner party without hearing at least one lawyer joke. Indeed, literature reveals that people have always hated lawyers. Samuel Coleridge wrote in The Devil's Thoughts: He saw a Lawyer killing a Viper On a dunghill hard by his own stable; t Professor of Law, Brigham Young University Law School. B.A. 1977, Brigham Young University; J.D. 1980, Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California, Berkeley. Just for the record (in case I am ever nominated for ajudicial appointment), I don't believe a word of this Essay. And if I do, I'm only being tentative. And if I'm not, I promise to let my colleagues dissuade me from my position shortly before the Senate confirmation hearings begin. After all, I watched the Bork hearings, too. I extend apologies and thanks to Dave Barry, Eliot A. Butler, Linda Bytof, Johnny Carson, Steven Chidester, Jesse H. Choper, Michael Cohen, Paul Duke, Vaughn J. Featherstone, J. Clifton Fleming, Jr., Frederick Mark Gedicks, Bruce C. Hafen, Carl S. Hawkins, Gregory Husisian, Brian C. Johnson, Edward L. Kimball, Jay Leno, Hans A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Distinction Between Lawyers As Advocates and As Activists; and the Role of the Law School Dean in Facilitating the Justice Mission
    Cleveland State Law Review Volume 40 Issue 3 Issues 3 and 4: The Justice Mission of Article 14 American Law Schools 1992 The Distinction between Lawyers as Advocates and as Activists; And the Role of the Law School Dean in Facilitating the Justice Mission James Douglas Texas Southern University Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev Part of the Legal Education Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Recommended Citation James Douglas, The Distinction between Lawyers as Advocates and as Activists; And the Role of the Law School Dean in Facilitating the Justice Mission, 40 Clev. St. L. Rev. 405 (1992) available at https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev/vol40/iss3/14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cleveland State Law Review by an authorized editor of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN LAWYERS AS ADVOCATES AND AS ACTIVISTS; AND THE ROLE OF THE LAW SCHOOL DEAN IN FACILITATING THE JUSTICE MISSION 1 JAMES DOUGLAS I. INTRODUCTION .................................... 405 II. THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN ADVOCACY AND ACTWISM ....... 405 m. THE ROLEOFTHE LAW DEAN ......................... 407 IV. THE LIMIm OF THE LAWYER'S ROLE ..................... 410 I. INTRODUCTION When David Barnhizer invited me to be involved in the Justice Mission conference I jumped at the opportunity; because justice is an issue that is extremely important to me, especially being a person of color in America. In presenting my ideas about the justice mission, I will be talking about two distinct concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • Advising Guide: Law School
    Advising Guide: Law School What is Law School? law. Every state’s bar association is an independent entity and membership is not reciprocal (passing the The study of law is unique. The graduate degree in California bar admits a person to practice law here, law, a juris doctor (J.D.), is typically awarded upon but not in another state). The requirements for completion of a three-year program of full time admission differ by state, but generally involved study. While the law degree is a doctoral degree, a passing an exam with both writing sections and master’s degree is not a pre-requisite for admission to standardized test questions. law school, and most students begin law school after earning their bachelor’s degree. Tell me more about the kinds of jobs in The process of applying to law school is a long and the field of law . difficult one. A student should begin actively Experts in all kinds of fields are necessary to assist researching and planning as soon as they know that with the many facets of law. Business lawyers help they are interested in going to law school after people register new businesses, and prepare graduation. Applicants should plan to take the Law contracts for their employers. Tax attorneys analyze School Admissions Test (LSAT) no later than the tax consequences of business transactions. Real December of the year before they will begin law estate attorneys handle transactions involving the school. While law schools typically set application buying, selling, or leasing of property. Estate lawyers receipt deadlines in the early spring (some as early as assist with the disposition of property after a February 1st), students should send their applications death.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuition and Fees Fees
    139 Introduction T UIT IO N AND FEES Juris Doctor Program ............................................................................................................................. 140 Joint Degree Programs ........................................................................................................................... 140 Juris Doctor Doctor Juris Graduate Programs ................................................................................................................................. 141 Program Special Tuition Rules Applicable to Part-Time Students .................................................................. 141 Tuition Equalization Fee ........................................................................................................................ 142 Other Fees ................................................................................................................................................ 143 Billing Policies .......................................................................................................................................... 144 Programs Graduate Graduate Payment of Tuition and Outstanding Balances .................................................................................. 144 Third-Party Billing ................................................................................................................................... 146 Veterans Affairs Benefits ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A GUIDE to TRANSITIONING from LAW STUDENT to LAWYER Introduction
    A GUIDE TO TRANSITIONING FROM LAW STUDENT TO LAWYER Introduction The NITA community is made up of extremely talented and effective litigators, judges, authors, and professors from around the world who lend their voices to a wide array of important topics in the legal community. In this whitepaper, learn from NITA faculty members: Michael Dale, Judith Ritter, and Rhani Lott, as they walk readers through the transition from experiences in law school to beginning your career in law. Mike, Judy, and Rhani are all professors of law and have many years of experience. We hope you will find this whitepaper helpful as you journey into your next chapter. www.nita.org 2 ARTICLE 1 Advice 101: Take Trial Advocacy in Law School Michael J. Dale Professor of Law at Nova Southeastern University College of Law Every law student should take a course in trial advocacy. It does not matter whether the student intends ever to go to court. understanding the effect of a problem in drafting is important It does not matter if the student has not decided in what area of the when a student is studying in these courses in law school as well law he or she wishes to practice nor even geographically where he as starting out in practice. or she will practice. It does matter that every lawyer understands what goes on in the courtroom at trial. Here are some reasons why. Second, when one takes a course in trial advocacy, the law student will be obligated to learn or relearn the law of evidence First, having an understanding of how disputes are resolved and professional responsibility in addition to whatever substantive in the courtroom impacts everything else a lawyer does.
    [Show full text]
  • JD Degree Online
    JD Degree Online ACADEMIC PROGRAM The Juris Doctor (JD) program consists of 90 units earned over a three-year (full-time) or four-year (part-time) period. The State Bar of California permits Trinity Law School JD students to earn the entire accredited degree either online, on-campus, or a combination of the two. WHAT WOULD MY SCHEDULE LOOK LIKE? The majority of online Juris Doctor coursework is completed independently by the student. Live sessions via video conferencing are required at specific times. Live sessions ensure that information studied independently is sufficiently comprehended. Law school is demanding, and regular live guidance throughout the JD degree is necessary for future Bar exam success. These live sessions will be held on the first three weeks of class and every other week after that. STUDENTS WHO START IN FALL FULL-TIME FALL STUDENTS Live Online Sessions | Pacific Standard Time Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday 6:00 - 7:00 pm 6:00 - 7:00 pm 6:00 - 7:00 pm 6:00 - 7:00 pm First Semester Contracts 1 Legal Writing 1 Torts 1 Criminal Law Second Semester Contracts 2 Legal Writing 2 Torts 2 Criminal Procedure PART-TIME FALL STUDENTS Live Online Sessions | Pacific Standard Time Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday 6:00 - 7:00 pm 6:00 - 7:00 pm 6:00 - 7:00 pm 6:00 - 7:00 pm First Semester Contracts 1 Legal Writing 1 Torts 1 N/A Second Semester Contracts 2 Legal Writing 2 Torts 2 N/A www.tls.edu OVER STUDENTS WHO START IN SPRING FULL-TIME SPRING STUDENTS Live Online Sessions | Pacific Standard Time Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday
    [Show full text]
  • LL.M. Program (Master of Laws) Student Handbook Is Available Online At
    LL.M. PROGRAM (MASTER OF LAWS) STUDENT HANDBOOK This document was prepared by the University of Houston Law Center. It is not a contract, and its contents are subject to revision without notice. Please check our website, http://www.law.uh.edu/llm for the most current version of this document and the referenced links for the most updated information. Updated: 8_2021 KJ/SG 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STUDENT HANDBOOK All law students are charged with knowledge of the contents of this handbook, the University of Houston Student Handbook, and all official communications posted on the official Law Center bulletin boards, via e-mail, Daily Lex, and in the semester class schedules. Students are responsible for complying with all requirements, rules and regulations set out in the respective documents. Every effort is made to keep this Handbook accurate and complete. Therefore, the information provided herein is subject to change or correction at any time. Other rules, policies, or procedures may be add as necessary. Updated: 8_2021 KJ/SG 2 I. ACADEMIC MATTERS ......................................................................................4 Conduct Requirements .........................................................................................4 Character and Fitness Issues ...............................................................................4 Attendance Requirements.....................................................................................4 Semester Course Load Requirements ..................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • THE PARADOX of ELITE LAW SCHOOLS in INDIA—A COMPARISON with CANADIAN LEGAL EDUCATION Upasana Dasgupta*
    THE PARADOX OF ELITE LAW SCHOOLS IN INDIA—A COMPARISON WITH CANADIAN LEGAL EDUCATION Upasana Dasgupta* Legal education, like law, should always be overhauled and refitted to changes in society. What is sought is a model of legal education that best meets the needs of the society, by law students and law professionals alike. In 1987, a new model of law school was established in Bengaluru, India—the National Law School of India University (NLSIU)—drawing largely upon components of the Socratic method and the case-study method that had already been implemented, tried and tested in North America. This paper is a comparison of legal education in North America, particularly in Canada, and in the National Law Universities (NLUs) in India, based on the model of NLSIU. The comparison identifies similarities and dissimilarities between legal education of two countries, India and Canada, one developed and one developing, both of which imbibed the Harvard case method at some point in time. The object of the study is to point out the paradoxes existing in legal education in general and the NLU system in India and is a preliminary study of whether Canadian law schools and NLU systems can learn lessons from each other. At one time—when law-school education was characterized by disinterested practitioners and academicians lecturing a passive group of students and evaluating them through closed-book examinations, where students needed to spend time memorizing the law instead of analyzing it—NLUs were a welcome experiment. They changed the face of legal education by encouraging discussion in class; incorporating an interdisciplinary approach, introducing research projects, compulsory internships and introducing many other innovations.
    [Show full text]
  • Who's Going to Law School?
    Who’s Going to Law School? Trends in Law School Enrollment Since the Great Recession Miranda Li, Phillip Yao, and Goodwin Liu* This study provides a comprehensive analysis of recent U.S. law school enrollment trends. With two sets of JD (Juris Doctor) enrollment data from 1999 to 2019, we discuss how the demographic composition of law students has changed since the Great Recession. We examine enrollment data by gender, race, ethnicity, and nationality, with particular attention to Asian * Copyright © 2020 Miranda Li, Phillip Yao & Goodwin Liu. Miranda Li is a 2019 graduate of Yale Law School, Phillip Yao is a 2019 graduate of Yale Law School, and Goodwin Liu is an Associate Justice of the California Supreme Court. This Article is an outgrowth of earlier work that provided a systematic account of the experiences of Asian Americans in the legal profession. See ERIC CHUNG, SAMUEL DONG, XIAONAN APRIL HU, CHRISTINE KWON & GOODWIN LIU, YALE LAW SCHOOL & NAT’L ASIAN PAC. AM. LAW ASS’N, A PORTRAIT OF ASIAN AMERICANS IN THE LAW 2-3 (2017) [hereinafter PORTRAIT PROJECT]. Our study is part of ongoing research in collaboration with the American Bar Foundation on diversity in the legal profession. For valuable input and support, we are grateful to the members of our research team: Ajay Mehrotra, Shih-Chun Chien, George Wang, Meghan Dawe, and Ellis Liang. For their generosity in sharing data and constructive insights, we are indebted to Barry Currier and Bill McAdams at the American Bar Association; Kellye Testy, Ann Gallagher, Kimberly Dustman, and Greg Camilli at the Law School Admission Council; and Judy Areen and Jeff Allum at the American Association of Law Schools.
    [Show full text]