DOCSLIB.ORG

Neuroptera, Raphidioptera and Mecoptera Assemblages Inhabiting Young Spruce (Picea Abies) Forests: Dominance Structure and Seasonal Activity Patterns

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

JOURNAL OF FOREST SCIENCE, 53, 2007 (Special Issue): 74–81 Neuroptera, Raphidioptera and Mecoptera assemblages inhabiting young spruce (Picea abies) forests: dominance structure and seasonal activity patterns Ľ. Vidlička1, J. Holuša2,3 1Institute of Zoology Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia 2Forestry and Game Management Research Institute, Jíloviště-Strnady, Frýdek-Místek, Czech Republic 3Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic ABSTraCT: Neuropteroid insects (Neuroptera, Raphidioptera) and scorpion flies (Mecoptera) were studied in six young spruce forest localities in the eastern part of the Czech Republic during years 2005 and 2006. Twenty-seven species of lacewings, four species of snake flies and four species of scorpion flies were found using the Malaise traps. Consequently, the seasonal flight activity of the seven most abundant species (Chrysopa perla, Hemerobius pini, Hemerobius humulinus, Dichrostigma flavipes, Phaeostigma notata, Panorpa communis and Panorpa germanica) is discussed. Keywords: Malaise traps; Neuroptera; Raphidioptera; Mecoptera; seasonal flight activity; faunistics; Czech Republic The research of neuropteroid insects (Neuropte- The flight activity of neuropteroid insects was ra and Raphidioptera) was carried very intensive- studied by Zelený (1984a,b) in one locality of ly in the Czech Republic during the last 25 years. Bohemia and later, a series of papers including The distribution of individual species was ob- localities in Slovakia and Moravia was published served especially by Zelený (1984a,b, 1986, 1988, by Vidlička (1994, 1995, 1998) and Holuša and 1995, 2004, 2005a,b) and Bezděk et al. (1997) in Vidlička (2002). Similar researches were conduct- Bohemia and Chládek (1995a), Chládek and ed by Szentkirályi (1992, 1997), Szentkirályi Zelený (1995), Ševčík (1995a, 1997, 1998, 1999a, and Kazinczy (2002), Szentkirályi et al. (1995) 2003), Ševčík and Hudeček (1995), Holuša and and Vas et al. (2001) in Hungary. Vidlička (2002) in Moravia. Summarization of all Only several authors (Martinek 1960; Bezděk relevant data on the occurrence of Neuroptera spe- et al. 1997; Holuša, Vidlička 2002) mention data cies in the Czech Republic and Slovakia was pre- about Neuroptera, Raphidioptera and Mecoptera sented by Jedlička et al. (2004). from spruce forest. Until recently scorpion flies (Mecoptera) in the Our study is focused mainly on following prob- Czech Republic (including Moravia) were studied lems. (i) What species spectrum of Neuroptera, by Chládek (1985a,b, 1995b), Ševčík (1995b, Raphidioptera and Mecoptera occurs in young 1999b), Ševčík and Hudeček (1994), Tajovský planted spruce forests? (ii) Which species of the and Lauterer (1986) and Zelený (2005c). studied insect orders are typical for such localities? Supported by the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic, Project No. MZe 0002070201. J. FOR. SCI., 53, 2007 (Special Issue): 74–81 74 (iii) What are the flight activity patterns of domi- during a two-year research (2005–2006). All data nant species in young spruce forests? regarding species richness and species dominance detected in each locality are presented in Table 1 MATERIAL anD METHODS (Neuroptera), Table 2 (Raphidioptera) and Table 3 (Mecoptera). Considering our research took place The study area is situated in the eastern part of only in spruce forests, the number of species found the Czech Republic. The study was carried out in is very high. In total, 78 species of Neuroptera the industrially affected region (Ostravská pánev (Jedlička et al. 2004) were previously recorded in Plateau) with forest coverage 9–20% (dominance Moravia what means that 27 species found (Table 1) of Norway spruce, Picea abies, 30–50%) and in the represent 35% of the entire species richness. Nízký Jeseník Hills (forest coverage 70%, domi- All studied localities can be divided into two nance of Norway spruce 67.8%) (Culek 1996). groups according to the species frequency what is The Norway spruce dominates in both studied re- obvious mainly in Neuroptera. The highest species gions, however other tree species as larch (Larix richness was ascertained in the villages Lesní Al- sp.), beech (Fagus sp.), pine (Pinus sp.), oak (Quer- brechtice and Skřipov (18, resp. 17 species of Neu- cus sp.), lime (Tilia sp.), birch (Betula sp.) are also roptera) and a slightly lower number was found in present. Woods form a heterogenic mosaic of dif- the village Podvihov (14 species). The second group ferently aged spruce forests. includes the localities Kyjovice, Pustá Polom and The neuropteroid insects (Neuroptera, Raphi- Paskov (9, 8, resp. 7 species). When we add next dioptera) and scorpion flies (Mecoptera) were col- two species of Neuroptera which were found in the lected by Malaise traps of Townes (1972) type locality Paskov in 1998 (Holuša, Vidlička 2002), (modified and made by f. Entomologické pomôcky, a total of nine species is known from this locality. Bratislava, RNDr. O. Šauša). The Malaise trap is a The higher species composition could be a result passive, non-powered and continuously operating of the spruce forest decline caused by drought and tent-like trap. Its height is 2 m and collecting surface infestation by honey fungus. By comparison, other is approximately 6 m2. Collecting sheets are black localities are covered with much closer and denser and a covering sheet is white. The trap is anchored spruce forests as in the surroundings of Skřipov. to the ground by ropes and metal hooks. During Localities Lesní Albrechtice and Skřipov. Spe- 2005–2006, one trap was placed in each of six lo- cies Chrysopa perla and Hemerobius humulinus calities (Kyjovice: 49°49'30.17''N, 18°3'4.38''E, 390 m were very abundant in both localities. Species a.s.l.; Pustá Polom: 49°51'38.05''N,18°0'16.99''E, 430 m Chrysoperla carnea s.l. was abundant only in these a.s.l.; Podvihov: 49°51'36.47''N, 17°58'46.72''E, 460 m localities. Species Nineta flava, Nineta pallida, a.s.l.; Lesní Albrechtice: 49°48'21.09''N, 17°53'4.78''E, Chrysotropia ciliata, Chrysopa pallens, Hemerobius 460 m a.s.l.; Skřipov: 49°48'39.08''N, 17°52'59.02''E, stigma, Wesmaelius nervosus, Drepanepteryx pha- 480 m a.s.l.; Paskov: 49°42'43.34''N, 18°16'45.7''E, laenoides, Coniopteryx pygmaea and Myrmeleon 270 m a.s.l.) in very young spruce forests (10–20- formicarius did not occur in other surveyed areas. year-old). All Malaise traps were installed in small Several of them live sparsely in coniferous forests. forest clearings, minimally 30 m inwards the forest. Hemerobius atrifrons is associated with European The forest clearings are covered mainly by rough larch (Larix decidua) (Aspöck et al. 1980). The reedgrass (Calamagrostis arundinacea) and shrubs rare snake fly species Inocellia crassicornis, which like bird cherry (Padus racemosa) are growing there distribution data for Silesia and Northern Moravia occasionally too. The traps were exposed from the regions were summarized by Ševčík (1995a), was beginning of April to the end of October. From April collected in Lesní Albrechtice. to July, they were emptied every second or third day Locality Kyjovice. Euryoecic species Chrysopa and from August to October, they were emptied perla, Hemerobius humulinus and Micromus va- monthly (J. Holuša leg.). riegatus are very abundant in coniferous and de- Figs. 1a–f display only the time period in which ciduous forests (Aspöck et al. 1980). Hemerobius selected species were recorded. pini, typical for pine trees (Pinus sp.) (Aspöck et al. 1980), was also numerous in this locality. The RESULTS anD DISCUSSION Siberian faunistic elements predominated in this locality. Regarding snake flies (Raphidioptera), the Altogether nearly 2,000 specimens from the or- most abundant species were typical for pine and ders Neuroptera, Raphidioptera and Mecoptera spruce forests (Dichrostigma flavipes, Phaeostigma including 35 species of 7 families were collected notata) (Aspöck et al. 1980). 75 J. FOR. SCI., 53, 2007 (Special Issue): 74–81 b Hemerobiusȱpini a 50 Hemerobius pini 12 45 n Pustá Polom 2005 n = 43 10 Skřipov 2005 n = 20 40 Skìípovȱ2005ȱȱȱnȱ=ȱ20 Podvihov 2005 n = 87 35 8 SkSkřipovìípov ȱ20062006 ȱȱȱ nn =ȱ =31ȱ31 30 x. 6 25 ex. e 20 15 4 10 2 5 0 0 (week) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 (week) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 April I May I June I July I August AprilȱȱȱIȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱMayȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱIȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱJuneȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱIȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱJulyȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱIȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱAugustȱ c Chrysopaȱperla d PustáȱPolomȱ2005ȱȱȱnnȱ=ȱ142 30 Chrysopa perla 35 Podvihov 2006 n = 42 n 30 Kyjoviceȱ2006ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱnȱ=ȱ13 25 Lesní Albrechtice 2006 n = 48 25 20 20 x. e 15 ex. 15 10 10 5 5 0 0 (week) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 (week) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 AprilȱȱȱIȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱMayȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱIȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱJuneȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱIȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱJulyȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱIȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱAugustȱ April I May I June I July I August e f 14 Hemerobiusȱhumulinusȱ 25 Dichrostigmaȱflavipes ȱandȱPhaeostigmaȱnotata Dfȱ SkřipovSkìipov ȱ20062006 ȱȱȱȱȱȱ n n=ȱ =34ȱ34 12 Pustá Polom 2006 n = 14 PustáȱPolomȱ2006ȱȱnȱ=ȱ14 20 10 SkSkřipovìípov ȱ20062006 ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ nn =ȱ= 47ȱ47 Pnȱ Podvihov 2005ȱ2005 ȱȱȱn n=ȱ =48ȱ48 8 15 ex. 6 ex. 10 4 2 5 0 0 (week) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 (week) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 AprilȱȱȱIȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱMayȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱIȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱJuneȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱIȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱJulyȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱIȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱAugustȱ ȱAprilȱȱȱIȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱMayȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱIȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱJuneȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱIȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱJulyȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱIȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱAugustȱ g Panorpaȱgermanica h Panorpaȱcommunis 25 70 Kyjoviceȱ2006ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱnȱ=ȱ83 SkřipovSkìipov 2005ȱ2005 ȱȱȱn n= ȱ15=ȱ15 60 PustáȱPolomȱ2006ȱȱȱnȱ=ȱ80 20 SkřipovSkìipov 2006ȱ2006 ȱȱȱn n= ȱ28=ȱ28 50 15 40 ex. ex. 10 30 20 5 10 0 0 April May June July August September October April May June July August September October April May June July August September October April May June July August September October Fig.
Recommended publications
  • Final Report 1

    Final Report 1

    Sand pit for Biodiversity at Cep II quarry Researcher: Klára Řehounková Research group: Petr Bogusch, David Boukal, Milan Boukal, Lukáš Čížek, František Grycz, Petr Hesoun, Kamila Lencová, Anna Lepšová, Jan Máca, Pavel Marhoul, Klára Řehounková, Jiří Řehounek, Lenka Schmidtmayerová, Robert Tropek Březen – září 2012 Abstract We compared the effect of restoration status (technical reclamation, spontaneous succession, disturbed succession) on the communities of vascular plants and assemblages of arthropods in CEP II sand pit (T řebo ňsko region, SW part of the Czech Republic) to evaluate their biodiversity and conservation potential. We also studied the experimental restoration of psammophytic grasslands to compare the impact of two near-natural restoration methods (spontaneous and assisted succession) to establishment of target species. The sand pit comprises stages of 2 to 30 years since site abandonment with moisture gradient from wet to dry habitats. In all studied groups, i.e. vascular pants and arthropods, open spontaneously revegetated sites continuously disturbed by intensive recreation activities hosted the largest proportion of target and endangered species which occurred less in the more closed spontaneously revegetated sites and which were nearly absent in technically reclaimed sites. Out results provide clear evidence that the mosaics of spontaneously established forests habitats and open sand habitats are the most valuable stands from the conservation point of view. It has been documented that no expensive technical reclamations are needed to restore post-mining sites which can serve as secondary habitats for many endangered and declining species. The experimental restoration of rare and endangered plant communities seems to be efficient and promising method for a future large-scale restoration projects in abandoned sand pits.
  • Folk Taxonomy, Nomenclature, Medicinal and Other Uses, Folklore, and Nature Conservation Viktor Ulicsni1* , Ingvar Svanberg2 and Zsolt Molnár3

    Folk Taxonomy, Nomenclature, Medicinal and Other Uses, Folklore, and Nature Conservation Viktor Ulicsni1* , Ingvar Svanberg2 and Zsolt Molnár3

    Ulicsni et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2016) 12:47 DOI 10.1186/s13002-016-0118-7 RESEARCH Open Access Folk knowledge of invertebrates in Central Europe - folk taxonomy, nomenclature, medicinal and other uses, folklore, and nature conservation Viktor Ulicsni1* , Ingvar Svanberg2 and Zsolt Molnár3 Abstract Background: There is scarce information about European folk knowledge of wild invertebrate fauna. We have documented such folk knowledge in three regions, in Romania, Slovakia and Croatia. We provide a list of folk taxa, and discuss folk biological classification and nomenclature, salient features, uses, related proverbs and sayings, and conservation. Methods: We collected data among Hungarian-speaking people practising small-scale, traditional agriculture. We studied “all” invertebrate species (species groups) potentially occurring in the vicinity of the settlements. We used photos, held semi-structured interviews, and conducted picture sorting. Results: We documented 208 invertebrate folk taxa. Many species were known which have, to our knowledge, no economic significance. 36 % of the species were known to at least half of the informants. Knowledge reliability was high, although informants were sometimes prone to exaggeration. 93 % of folk taxa had their own individual names, and 90 % of the taxa were embedded in the folk taxonomy. Twenty four species were of direct use to humans (4 medicinal, 5 consumed, 11 as bait, 2 as playthings). Completely new was the discovery that the honey stomachs of black-coloured carpenter bees (Xylocopa violacea, X. valga)were consumed. 30 taxa were associated with a proverb or used for weather forecasting, or predicting harvests. Conscious ideas about conserving invertebrates only occurred with a few taxa, but informants would generally refrain from harming firebugs (Pyrrhocoris apterus), field crickets (Gryllus campestris) and most butterflies.
  • Neuropterida of the Lower Cretaceous of Southern England, with a Study on Fossil and Extant Raphidioptera

    Neuropterida of the Lower Cretaceous of Southern England, with a Study on Fossil and Extant Raphidioptera

    NEUROPTERIDA OF THE LOWER CRETACEOUS OF SOUTHERN ENGLAND, WITH A STUDY ON FOSSIL AND EXTANT RAPHIDIOPTERA A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of PhD in the Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences 2010 JAMES EDWARD JEPSON SCHOOL OF EARTH, ATMOSPHERIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES TABLE OF CONTENTS FIGURES.......................................................................................................................8 TABLES......................................................................................................................13 ABSTRACT.................................................................................................................14 LAY ABSTRACT.........................................................................................................15 DECLARATION...........................................................................................................16 COPYRIGHT STATEMENT...........................................................................................17 ABOUT THE AUTHOR.................................................................................................18 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..............................................................................................19 FRONTISPIECE............................................................................................................20 1. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................21 1.1. The Project.......................................................................................................21
  • Insect Egg Size and Shape Evolve with Ecology but Not Developmental Rate Samuel H

    Insect Egg Size and Shape Evolve with Ecology but Not Developmental Rate Samuel H

    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1302-4 Insect egg size and shape evolve with ecology but not developmental rate Samuel H. Church1,4*, Seth Donoughe1,3,4, Bruno A. S. de Medeiros1 & Cassandra G. Extavour1,2* Over the course of evolution, organism size has diversified markedly. Changes in size are thought to have occurred because of developmental, morphological and/or ecological pressures. To perform phylogenetic tests of the potential effects of these pressures, here we generated a dataset of more than ten thousand descriptions of insect eggs, and combined these with genetic and life-history datasets. We show that, across eight orders of magnitude of variation in egg volume, the relationship between size and shape itself evolves, such that previously predicted global patterns of scaling do not adequately explain the diversity in egg shapes. We show that egg size is not correlated with developmental rate and that, for many insects, egg size is not correlated with adult body size. Instead, we find that the evolution of parasitoidism and aquatic oviposition help to explain the diversification in the size and shape of insect eggs. Our study suggests that where eggs are laid, rather than universal allometric constants, underlies the evolution of insect egg size and shape. Size is a fundamental factor in many biological processes. The size of an 526 families and every currently described extant hexapod order24 organism may affect interactions both with other organisms and with (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1). We combined this dataset with the environment1,2, it scales with features of morphology and physi- backbone hexapod phylogenies25,26 that we enriched to include taxa ology3, and larger animals often have higher fitness4.
  • The Role of Ecological Compensation Areas in Conservation Biological Control

    The Role of Ecological Compensation Areas in Conservation Biological Control

    The role of ecological compensation areas in conservation biological control ______________________________ Promotor: Prof.dr. J.C. van Lenteren Hoogleraar in de Entomologie Promotiecommissie: Prof.dr.ir. A.H.C. van Bruggen Wageningen Universiteit Prof.dr. G.R. de Snoo Wageningen Universiteit Prof.dr. H.J.P. Eijsackers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Prof.dr. N. Isidoro Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italië Dit onderzoek is uitgevoerd binnen de onderzoekschool Production Ecology and Resource Conservation Giovanni Burgio The role of ecological compensation areas in conservation biological control ______________________________ Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor op gezag van de rector magnificus van Wageningen Universiteit, Prof. dr. M.J. Kropff, in het openbaar te verdedigen op maandag 3 september 2007 des namiddags te 13.30 in de Aula Burgio, Giovanni (2007) The role of ecological compensation areas in conservation biological control ISBN: 978-90-8504-698-1 to Giorgio Multaque tum interiisse animantum saecla necessest nec potuisse propagando procudere prolem. nam quaecumque vides vesci vitalibus auris aut dolus aut virtus aut denique mobilitas est ex ineunte aevo genus id tutata reservans. multaque sunt, nobis ex utilitate sua quae commendata manent, tutelae tradita nostrae. principio genus acre leonum saevaque saecla tutatast virus, vulpis dolus et gfuga cervos. at levisomma canum fido cum pectore corda et genus omne quod est veterino semine partum lanigeraeque simul pecudes et bucera saecla omnia sunt hominum tutelae tradita, Memmi. nam cupide fugere feras pacemque secuta sunt et larga suo sine pabula parta labore, quae damus utilitatiseorum praemia causa. at quis nil horum tribuit natura, nec ipsa sponte sua possent ut vivere nec dare nobis praesidio nostro pasci genus esseque tatum, scilicet haec aliis praedae lucroque iacebant indupedita suis fatalibus omnia vinclis, donec ad interutum genus id natura redegit.
  • Insecta: Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae)

    Insecta: Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae)

    Arthropod Structure & Development 50 (2019) 1e14 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Arthropod Structure & Development journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/asd Small, but oh my! Head morphology of adult Aleuropteryx spp. and effects of miniaturization (Insecta: Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae) * Susanne Randolf , Dominique Zimmermann Natural History Museum Vienna, 2nd Zoological Department, Burgring 7, 1010, Vienna, Austria article info abstract Article history: We present the first morphological study of the internal head structures of adults of the coniopterygid Received 15 October 2018 genus Aleuropteryx, which belong to the smallest known lacewings. The head is ventrally closed with a Accepted 1 February 2019 gula, which is unique in adult Neuroptera and otherwise developed in Megaloptera, the sister group of Neuroptera. The dorsal tentorial arms are directed posteriorly and fused, forming an arch that fulfills functions otherwise taken by the tentorial bridge. A newly found maxillary gland is present in both sexes. Keywords: Several structural modifications correlated with miniaturization are recognized: a relative increase in Miniaturization the size of the brain, a reduction in the number of ommatidia and diameter of the facets, a countersunken Brain fi Musculature cone-shaped ocular ridge, and a simpli cation of the tracheal system. The structure of the head differs Maxillary gland strikingly from that of the previously studied species Coniopteryx pygmaea, indicating a greater vari- Tentorium ability in the family Coniopterygidae, which might be another effect of miniaturization. Gula © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction With nearly 560 described species, Coniopterygidae are one of the four most speciose neuropteran families, inhabiting all Miniaturization is a common phenomenon in many groups of zoogeographical regions with the exception of extremely cold animals and has major effects not only on the morphology but also areas (Sziraki, 2011).
  • Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on Neuropterology

    Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on Neuropterology

    _____________________________________________________ Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on Neuropterology. Piran, Slovenia, 2008. Devetak, D., Lipovšek, S. & Arnett, A.E. (eds). Maribor, Slovenia, 2010. Pp. 127–134. ___________________________________________________________________________ The actual annual occurrence of the green lacewings of northwestern Europe (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) Michel Canard1, Dominique Thierry2, Andrew E. Whittington3 & András Bozsik4 147 chemin Flou de Rious, F-31400 Toulouse, France ; E-mail: [email protected]; 212 rue Martin Luther King, F-49000 Angers, France ; E-mail: dominique [email protected]; 3FlyEvidence, Pentlands Science Park, Bush Loan, Penicuik, Scotland, EH26 0PL, UK; E-mail: [email protected] 4Plant Protection Department, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Debrecen, Pf 36, H-4015 Debrecen, Hungary; E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Quantitative surveys of chrysopids from northwestern Europe were analysed. A total of thirty-five species are known within the zone although only twenty-six were recorded. Only the common green lacewings (i.e. the sibling species of the Chrysoperla carnea complex, here not differentiated) were elsewhere abundant comprising more than 3/4 of the specimens in all countries and reaching 97 % in Belgium. For the scarcer species, comments are given on their enhanced geographic range. The French fauna shows 19 species, six are exceptional (< 0.1 %) such as the Atlanto-Mediterranean Dichochrysa picteti. Five species are considered rare (1<Q ≤ 5 %): Chrysopa perla, Ch. phyllochroma, Dichochrysa flavifrons, D. inornata and D. prasina. The fauna of both Great Britain and Ireland has the same faunistical richness but manifests a more balanced equitability. Chrysopa perla, Dichochrysa flavifrons and Cunctochrysa albolineata are uncommon (5 < Q ≤ 15 %), the others are at least rare.
  • Seasonal Adaptations of Green Lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae)

    Seasonal Adaptations of Green Lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae)

    REVIEW Eur.1. Entomol. 102: 317-324, 2005 ISSN 1210-5759 Seasonal adaptations of green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) MICHEL CANARD 47 chemin Flou de Rious, F-31400 Toulouse, France; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Chrysopidae, green lacewing, seasonal adaptation, diapause, voltinism, overwintering, eycle synchronization, wintering chambers Abstract. Seasonal adaptations of green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) and their role in the control of aphid populations are discussed. The chrysopids of temperate zones face seasonal changes and must escape cyclic adversity. One way is via the number of broods per year. Most green lacewings are facultatively multivoltine, with the succession of generations most often regulated by photomediated diapause. Others are univoltine and some extend their life-cycle to two years in cold or dry environments. Synchroni­ zation is an important feature of seasonality, often starting in spring. In univoltine species, it is sometimes the result of subtle mecha­ nisms, such as double contradictory signals (short plus long day lengths) for reactivation in spring, or a multi-receptivity of the preimaginal instars to photoperiod throughout a year, combined with photo-controlled and synchronized egg laying in late summer. Only one North American species is known to enter a surnumerary food-mediated diapause in summer. Every postembryonic instar may undergo diapause depending on the species. The timing and impact of the spring resumption in aphid consumption depends on their overwintering strategy. As far is known, chrysopids are intolerant of freezing, but their supercooling points are low enough to enable them to endure hard frost. The numbers of overwintering specimens of green lacewings in the field depend on the structure of the as~emblages in the pre­ vious growing season.
  • December 2019 Suzanne Burgess and Joanna Lindsay

    December 2019 Suzanne Burgess and Joanna Lindsay

    December 2019 Suzanne Burgess and Joanna Lindsay Saving the small things that run the planet Summary Of the 70 species of lacewing recorded in the United Kingdom, at least forty-one of them have been recorded in Scotland, with four only being recorded in Scotland. The Bordered brown lacewing (Megalomus hirtus) was previously known from only two sites in Scotland, at Salisbury’s Crags in Holyrood Park, Edinburgh and at Doonie Point by Bridge of Muchalls in Aberdeenshire. Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) provided funding to Buglife for year two of the Bordered Brown Lacewing project to run surveys and workshops to raise awareness and improve participant’s identification skills of the different species of lacewing and their allies (alderflies, scorpionflies and snake flies). With the help of volunteers, year two of the project successfully found twenty two adults of the Bordered brown lacewing. Two new areas were discovered at Holyrood Park at rocky outcrops close to St. Anthony’s Chapel and a new population was discovered at Skatie Shore and Perthumie Bay by Stonehaven. A further nine adults were found by Dr Nick Littlewood at six locations from the war memorial south of Stonehaven to Portlethen Village. A total of 264 records of 141 different species of invertebrate, including five species of lacewing, were recorded during surveys and workshops run through this project from six sites: Holyrood Park, in Edinburgh; Hermitage of Braid and Blackford Hill Local Nature Reserve in Edinburgh; Skatie Shore and Perthumie Bay by Stonehaven; Doonie Point by Bridge of Muchalls; St Cyrus National Nature Reserve near Montrose; and Drumpellier Park in North Lanarkshire.
  • A Taxonomic Review of the Common Green Lacewing Genus Chrysoperla (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae)

    A Taxonomic Review of the Common Green Lacewing Genus Chrysoperla (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae)

    Bull. Br. nat. Hist. (Ent.) 63(2): 137-210 Issued 24 November 1994 A taxonomic review of the common green lacewing genus Chrysoperla (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) S.J. BROOKS Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5 ED CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................... ........... 137 Historical review .................................................................................... 138 Generic classification ............................................................................ 138 Species classification ............................................................................. 139 Materials and methods ............................................................................. 140 Abbreviations ........................................................................................ 140 Acknowledgements ................................................................................. 141 The systematic position of Chrysoperla ........................................................ 141 Species affinities within Chrysoperla ........................................................... 142 Chrysoperla Steinmann .. .. ... .... .. .. ... .. ... ... ... ... .... .. .... .. ..... ... ... 143 Key to the world Chrysoperla species ....................................................... 144 Species descriptions .............................................................................. 146 Synoptic checklist of the species of Chrysoperla ............................................
  • Typifying Ecosystems by Using Green Lacewing Assemblages

    Typifying Ecosystems by Using Green Lacewing Assemblages

    Agron. Sustain. Dev. 25 (2005) 473-479 473 © INRA, EDP Sciences, 2005 DOl: 10.1051!agro:2005047 Research article Typifying ecosystems by using green lacewing assemblages Dominique THIERRya*, Bruno DEUTSCHb, Mihaela PAUUANc, Johanna VILLENAVEd, Michel CANARD" a Universite Catholique de rOuest, Departernent des Sciences de la Vie et de la Terre, 44 rue Rabelais, 49000 Angers, France b Universite Catholique de rOuest, Institllt de MathCmatiques Appliqm'cs, 3 place Andre Leroy, 49000 Angers, France c Institlltul de Ccrcetari pentru Protectia Plantelor, Bd. Ion Ionescu dela Brad 8, 77592 Bucuresti, Romania d Institut National d'Horticulture, Unite de Protection des Plantes, 2 rue Le Notre, 49045 Angers Ccdex 01, France e (retired) 47 chemin F10u de Rious, 31400 Toulouse, France (Accepted 20 May 2005) Abstract - Green lacewing collection data from eleven various biotopes were used to typify different ecological landscapes. To make up the values recorded on single samples, we operated by the bootstrap method. A classifying process cluster scatterplot was then established to assess the proximity of the different habitats. Shannon's and Hurlbert's indices are highly sensitive parameters of the structure of assemblages. Their analysis results in a diagrammatic typological approach to the biotopes, allowing unambiguous comparisons between various chrysopid assemblagcs. It is possible to characterize the state of these polyvalent predators as a function of different abundance and diversity, and this state can be a standard of value of good ecological function in ecosystems. Concerning farming consultation and environmental conservation, such an approach is new and could be promising for future agricultural and landscape managers. biodiversity / green lacewing / faunistic richness / diversity index I equitability index 1.
  • Neuroptera: Chrysopidae)

    Neuroptera: Chrysopidae)

    Eur. J. Entomol. 107: 65–72, 2010 http://www.eje.cz/scripts/viewabstract.php?abstract=1510 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Detection of oviposition-deterring larval tracks in Chrysopa oculata and Chrysopa perla (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) ZDENK RŽIKA Institute of Entomology, Biology Centre of Academy of Sciences, Branišovská 31, 370 05 eské Budjovice, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Neuroptera, Chrysopidae, Chrysopa oculata, C. perla, antennae, cannibalism, palpi, pheromones, predator, semiochemical, sensory ablation Abstract. We investigated the ability of females of the aphidophagous chrysopids Chrysopa oculata and Chrysopa perla to distin- guish clean substrates from substrates with tracks of chrysopid first instars after ablation of various sensory organs potentially involved in the detection of oviposition-deterring semiochemicals (ODSCs). Also studied were effects of storage time on the degree of oviposition deterrence of substrates contaminated by larvae and by extracts of ODSC in intact females. C. oculata and C. perla laid significantly fewer eggs on substrates with conspecific larval tracks than on simultaneously provided clean substrates. Females of both chrysopids could perceive ODSCs solely through sense organs on the head. The oviposition of each species was significantly lower on contaminated than on clean substrates when any kind of sense organ on the head was completely removed, i.e. antennae, maxillary palpi, or labial palpi. C. oculata could still effectively differentiate substrates after ablation of both maxillary and labial palpi, indicating possible detection of volatiles via the antennae during flight. Only if all three pairs of sensory appendages were removed did females lay similar numbers of eggs on both substrates.