DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2020: Reckoning with Justice

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Annual Report 2020: Reckoning with Justice Annual Report 2020: Reckoning with Justice From the President Dear Friends, decimated during the federal government’s response to COVID-19. 2020 will sit heavy in the history books. As the year closes, we The tide is turning toward justice. Massive mourn more than 1.3 million nationwide protests show that Americans have victims of the COVID-19 pandemic, had enough. On Election Day, justice was on a global health crisis that fell the ballot, and Black and brown voters delivered heaviest on the least fortunate. We a decisive message, swaying the election grieve the loss of George Floyd, and sustaining our optimism for reform. The Breonna Taylor, and many others whose brutal American Election Eve Poll, in which Vera was deaths at the hands of police ignited the most a partner, found that more than three-quarters profound societal reckoning with racism that of all voters support removing laws that make we have seen in our lifetimes. We look with it hard to hold police officers accountable cautious optimism at an election that tested our when they kill or abuse Black people. Seventy- democracy and resulted in a President-elect nine percent of Latinx voters and more than 80 who has promised to address structural racism. percent of Black voters say U.S. immigration Opportunity lies in this difficult moment. policy should focus on creating a humane system that is fair to all, rather than focusing on Vera pivoted in unexpected directions to enforcement. address the events of 2020. As the pandemic spread, millions of people were confined We are poised to take advantage of this in prisons, jails, and immigration detention momentum. I am grateful to our dedicated staff facilities where it was impossible to practice members, whose commitment to justice and social distancing. Jails quickly became the top human dignity did not waver under immense COVID-19 hotspots in the country, proving what stress. I want to thank our partners, some Vera has long preached: mass incarceration has of whom risked their own health and safety no place in a healthy society. entering courtrooms, jails, and detention facilities to gain freedom for their clients during Freeing people unjustly confined in jails, the worst public health crisis in a generation. I prisons, and immigration detention facilities want to thank all of our friends and supporters, became not just a matter of conscience, who stand with us at a pivotal moment. Your but a matter of life and death. Vera used generous and committed partnership fuels our its knowledge of the criminal legal system fight for justice. to provide guidance for how system actors should keep people safe, primarily through Uncertain times lie ahead, but I take pride in decarceration and preventing new arrests. Our Vera’s work during a year of great suffering emergency response work provides inspiration and seismic change. We approach the coming for future efforts toward ending mass challenges with optimism and remain persistent incarceration and immigration detention. in our commitment to securing justice for all. We’re seeking bold transformations in a criminal Thank you, legal system with roots established in slavery; a system that continues to disregard the humanity of Black people at every stage. We’re fighting for humane treatment of immigrants, whose rights, already under assault, have been Nicholas Turner, President 4 Vera Institute of Justice From the Board Chair Dear Friends, action that would empower tens of thousands of people to pursue higher education and The challenges of 2020 make clear improve their prospects. just how much Vera’s work matters. Drawing on nearly 60 years of Vera’s Reshaping Prosecution initiative is experience in working to transform helping district attorneys’ offices use their the criminal legal and immigration power to address the harms of systemic systems, Vera is making a racism and end mass incarceration, while the difference during this time of Restoring Promise initiative is expanding its upheaval and crisis. efforts to improve the conditions and culture of jails and prisons, transforming them into safe When COVID-19 swept the country, leaving environments that center human dignity. That people in jails, prisons, and detention program expanded into three new states in centers deeply vulnerable to infection, Vera 2020. provided municipal leaders with specific recommendations to prevent the spread of the The Safety and Fairness for Everyone Initiative virus by slowing arrests, curbing unnecessary (SAFE) also continues to expand its network prosecutions, and reducing jail and prison of publicly funded legal defense programs, populations. reaching 21 jurisdictions across 11 states. This means that more immigrants who can’t afford a When COVID-19 started making people in lawyer get one, which gives them a fair chance immigration detention facilities sick, Vera to fight for their rights in immigration court. joined a coalition of voices calling on ICE to immediately release all from custody. Vera As Vera approaches our 60th anniversary, challenged the government’s implausible we will lean on our history as we continue the claims of low COVID-19 infections in detention fight. Challenges lie ahead, but we remain facilities, with realistic modeling that showed steadfastly focused on our goal: a future in the numbers were likely 15 times higher than which dignity, safety, and justice are available official reports. to all. When the country erupted in righteous anger Thank you, over police brutality, Vera rapidly produced and shared data, analysis, and context that helped lift up community-based solutions. Knowing the true cost of policing as a percentage of total budgets provided protesters, reformers, and municipal leaders with the tools to fight for a Damien Dwin, Board Chair more humane distribution of resources. Beyond addressing these crises, Vera scored a major victory as the U.S. House of Representatives voted to reverse the federal ban on Pell Grants for incarcerated students, an Annual Report 2020: Reckoning with Justice 5 Contents 7 Addressing systemic harms 14 Dismantling systems of oppression 25 Building community power 33 Reframing the narrative 37 The year in photos 39 Financial information 2020 40 An interview with Nancy Kestenbaum and David Klafter 41 An interview with Lisa Opoku 42 Board of Trustees, Honorary Trustees, and Reform Leadership Council 43 Supporters, monthly donors, and pro bono partners 6 Vera Institute of Justice Addressing systemic harms era is working to center human dignity and minimize the harms of criminal legal and immigration system Vinvolvement that are inflicted on millions in the United States—especially on Black people and communities of color. Our work took on a heightened urgency this year with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, during which people incarcerated in jails, prisons, and detention centers were left largely unprotected. Annual Report 2020: Reckoning with Justice 7 Saving lives in the COVID-19 pandemic 1,376 deaths 37,438 181,478 COVID-19 cases 74 COVID-19 cases deaths due to COVID-19 of among staff working in among people incarcer- people incarcerated in due to COVID-19 of staff prisons. ated in prisons. prisons. working in prisons. Protecting a population at risk In early 2020, as America became the global epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic, Vera mobilized to help protect people in jails, prisons, and detention centers facing extreme risk of infection with no ability to protect themselves. We provided government leaders and advocates with specific recommendations to prevent further transmission of the virus by dramatically slowing arrests, stopping immigration raids, ending unnecessary prosecutions, and reducing jail and prison populations. We developed data tools tracking jail populations to monitor the impact of the criminal legal system’s response and provide accountability. And we shared our extensive guidance and resources with thousands of local, state, and federal officials through blog posts, special reports, webinars, and videos. Our response work has played a critical role in freeing people: › In New Orleans and Los Angeles, our staff coordinated with advocates and system stakeholders to get people out of jail, contributing to a decline of almost 20 percent in the jail population in both places during the height of the outbreak. › In Houston, we drafted—and judges approved—a new standing bail order mandating release for many offenses. In the weeks immediately following its implementation, the jail population declined by 17 percent. › In Kentucky, which entered the COVID-19 pandemic with the second highest rate of jail admissions in the nation, Vera called for expanding the Kentucky Supreme 8 Vera Institute of Justice Court’s mandatory release bail policy in the wake of COVID-19. This policy change reduced the statewide jail population by more than 25 percent during the summer of 2020. › In New York, an early epicenter of the pandemic, Vera released guidance briefs on the urgent need to release people from the state’s prisons and Rikers Island jail. We developed an online data tool—Jail Viz 2.0—that allows users to see in real time who is incarcerated in New York City’s jails and why. Advocates, city officials, and even the City’s Board of Correction have told us that they used the tool to track progress on reducing the number of people at Rikers Island. Vera is currently developing a similar tool to track the daily state prison population. Demanding release of immigrants in detention Our COVID-19 work focused as well on America’s massive immigrant Fact: According to the detention system, which in 2019 held as many as half a million people Washington ost, migrant in prison-like conditions that create a high risk for rapid spread of this arrests at the border rose to a dangerous virus. 13-month As the pandemic spread in the early months of 2020, Vera joined with high local leaders in calling on immigration officials to immediately release in September 2020.
Recommended publications
  • Toward a Global Critical Feminist Vision: Domestic Work and the Nanny Tax Debate

    Toward a Global Critical Feminist Vision: Domestic Work and the Nanny Tax Debate

    University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law Faculty Scholarship Francis King Carey School of Law Faculty 1999 Toward a Global Critical Feminist Vision: Domestic Work and the Nanny Tax Debate Taunya Lovell Banks University of Maryland School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/fac_pubs Part of the Labor and Employment Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons, and the Law and Race Commons Digital Commons Citation Banks, Taunya Lovell, "Toward a Global Critical Feminist Vision: Domestic Work and the Nanny Tax Debate" (1999). Faculty Scholarship. 220. https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/fac_pubs/220 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Francis King Carey School of Law Faculty at DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Toward a Global Critical Feminist Vision: Domestic Work and the Nanny Tax Debate Taunya Lovell Banks* I. INTRODUCTION ll. THE UNDER REGULATION OF DOMESTIC LABOR A. Domestic Work Is Not Real Work B. Domestic Work Is a Private Matter C. Domestic Work as Women's Work ill. LEGISLATIVE NARRATIVE: FRAMING THE PUBLIC POLICY DEBATE A. The Legislative Debates About Employees B. The Legislative Debates About Employers C. Public Debates: What's in a Name-Racial Markers IV. COMPETINGGENDEREDNARRATIVESABOUTDOMESTICWORK:AFFLUENT WORKING WOMEN AND BLACK FEMINISTS A. Affluent Women: Zoe Baird, Not One of Us? B. Black Feminists: Zoe Baird, Not One of Us-Black Women as Domestic Workers, Myth or Reality C.
  • Four Freedoms Park Conservancy 2017 & 2018

    Four Freedoms Park Conservancy 2017 & 2018

    Four Freedoms Park Conservancy 2017 & 2018 Four Freedoms Park Conservancy Board of Directors William J. vanden Heuvel, Founder & Chair Emeritus • Mrs. Franklin D. Roosevelt, Jr., Honorary Chair Barbara Shattuck Kohn, Chair • Sally Minard, Vice Chair • Alison M. von Klemperer, Secretary William R. Griffith, Treasurer • Clark Copelin • John S. Dyson • Barbara Georgescu • David Handler Donald B. Hilliker • Warren Hoge • Eduardo Jany • Jessica S. Lappin • Richard Lorenti • David A. Paterson James S. Polshek, Emeritus • Katrina vanden Heuvel • Chris Ward • William Whitaker, Ex Officio Four Freedoms Park Conservancy operates, maintains, and programs Franklin D. Roosevelt Four Freedoms State Park to the highest standard. As steward of this extraordinary civic space designed by Louis I. Kahn, the Conservancy advances President Roosevelt’s legacy and inspires, educates, and engages the public in the ideals of the Four Freedoms: freedom of speech and expression, freedom of worship, freedom from want, and freedom from fear. The Conservancy does this by: • safeguarding the memorial as a space for inspired use • fostering community and understanding • igniting conversation about human rights and freedoms today Connect with us and join the conversation: facebook.com/fdrfourfreedomspark | @4freedomspark | fdrfourfreedomspark.org New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation, Rose Harvey, Commissioner Table of Contents A Message from Four Freedoms Park Conservancy Leadership 2 A Message from NY State Parks Commissioner Rose Harvey 3 Board Spotlight: Eduardo Jany 4 Park Visitorship 2013-2018: 1,000,000 & Counting 5 Planning for the Future: Preserving an Architectural 6 Masterpiece in the East River Inspiring the Next Generation Through FDR's Four Freedoms 8 Public Programs & Events at FDR Four Freedoms State Park 12 Four Freedoms Exemplars Lifetime Achievement Awards: 14 Honoring Tom Brokaw & William J.
  • MOST INFLUENTIAL WOMEN in STATE POLITICS ALABAMA STEPHANIE AZAR the VETERAN ADMINISTRATOR HAS REVOLUTIONIZED MEDICAID SERVICES in the STATE by Marissa Evans

    MOST INFLUENTIAL WOMEN in STATE POLITICS ALABAMA STEPHANIE AZAR the VETERAN ADMINISTRATOR HAS REVOLUTIONIZED MEDICAID SERVICES in the STATE by Marissa Evans

    A SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT FOR THE 2016 DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL CONVENTION MOST25 INFLUENTIAL WOMEN IN STATE POLITICS PRESENTED BY CQ ROLL CALL | 51 INTRODUCTION CONTENTS 53 Stephanie Azar 54 Kimberly Yee 55 Toni Atkins T IS OFTEN SAID that wom- en running,” she says. en have come a long way While she says there are many 56 Kamala Harris in politics. But they haven’t reasons women don’t run for office, Iadvanced much lately. we think one of the most inter- 57 After sharp gains in the 1980s, esting may be that women often Felicia Marcus women today hold less than a look at America’s partisan and MOST25 INFLUENTIAL 58 quarter of the state legislative WOMEN IN combative political institutions Mary D. Nichols seats and statewide executive STATE POLITICS and conclude that they’re not the offices, and less than 30 percent place to be if you want to make 59 of the state judgeships. Across a difference in the world. Cynthia Coffman the 50 states, there are six women governors. Of course, sometimes government can be a Since the turn of the 21st century, according to place that makes a difference. 60 Pam Bondi the Center for American Women and Politics at In this special issue of CQ for the Democratic Rutgers University, women have held between National Convention, we tell the stories of 25 61 22.6 and 28 percent of such offices. In 2015, women women in state government who have made a dif- Anitere Flores held 24.7 percent of statewide executive offices. In ference. 62 state legislatures, women in 1999 held 22.4 percent In our search for these 25 women, reporters and Dana Young of the seats nationwide.
  • Programs & Exhibitions

    Programs & Exhibitions

    PROGRAMS & EXHIBITIONS Winter/Spring 2019 To purchase tickets by phone call (212) 485-9268 letter | exhibitions | calendar | programs | family | membership | general information Dear Friends, New-York Historical’s Winter/Spring 2019 roster of exhibitions and programs brings some of today’s most vexed discussions and debates—around the environment, the presidency, the Supreme Court, LGBTQ rights, race relations, and more—into enlightening and constructive dialogue with our nation’s history. Hudson Rising, on view in our Robert H. and Clarice Smith Gallery, explores two centuries of change along “the most interesting river in America.” Stonewall 50, presented in our Pam and Scott Schafler Gallery, commemorates the 50th anniversary of the 1969 Stonewall uprising with a focus on LGBTQ culture. Augusta Savage: Renaissance Woman, presented in our Luman Reed Galleries, showcases the work of an artist of the Harlem Renaissance who overcame poverty, racism, and sexual discrimination to become one of the nation’s most influential 20th-century artists. We are proud to feature Stonewall 50 and Augusta Savage as part of our ongoing examination of the history of civil rights in America, an initiative generously funded by the New York City Council as well as Empire State Development and the New York State Council on the Arts under Governor Andrew Cuomo’s Regional Economic Development Council Initiative. This season’s Bernard and Irene Schwartz Distinguished Speakers Series will reflect many of the topics and themes raised by our exhibitions, with conversations between U.S. Senator Doug Jones and Eddie Glaude Jr. on Senator Jones’ prosecution of two former Ku Klux Klan members; legal scholars Kenji Yoshino and Linda Greenhouse on how LGBTQ rights have evolved in the 50 years since the Stonewall uprising; and New-York Historical Presidential historian Douglas Brinkley and author John A.
  • Dinner Journal

    Dinner Journal

    Hon. William C. Conner Inn of Court Reception and Dinner January 17, 2012 The Union League Club of New York Judge William C. Conner Mission of the Hon. William C. Conner Inn of Court The mission of the Hon. William C. Conner Inn of Court is to promote excellence in professionalism, ethics, civility, and legal skills for judges, lawyers, academicians, and students of law and to advance the education of the members of the Inn, the members of the bench and bar, and the public in the fields of intellectual property law. In Memoriam Janice Conner Janice Conner, wife of Hon. William C. Conner, passed away on September 12, 2011. She was a special guest and friendly face at Judge Conner’s side for many intellectual property gather- ings, including the Inaugural Conner Inn Dinner in 2009. Her family placed this article in the Austin American-Statesman. anice Files Conner was born September 2, 1922, man could ever have” recognizing that she made J in Itasca, Texas to Janie and Sidney Files. Her his “Lucky Life,” as a distinguished Federal Judge identical twin sister Joyce arrived seven minutes and father, possible. Their blissful union spanned later, leading to a life of gently teasing her sister for more than 66 years, mostly as residents of Dobbs never being on time. Jan was a brilliant and dedi- Ferry, NY, next door to Irvington where her twin cated student, graduating Summa cum Laude from settled, creating everlasting confusion amongst the the University of Texas before earning a Masters in locals. Jan was the most wonderful, clever Mom Dietetics at Johns Hopkins University.
  • Judicial Notice / Issue 5

    Judicial Notice / Issue 5

    ISSUE 5 AUTUMN 2007 The Historical Society of the Courts of the State of New York JOHN JAY AS NEW YORK'S FIRST TO BETTER THE BENCH: The Labor of CHIEF JUSTICE BY WalteR StahR C. C. Burlingham1 n the late spring of 1777, after finishing their work BY GEORge MARtin OFFICERS: on the state constitution, John Jay and the other del- egates meeting in Kingston turned to the question of Albert M. Rosenblatt, hat, YOU maY asK, who would fill certain key positions in the new state President I can a single lawyer, government. The constitution provided a procedure W not holding public office, for appointing justices and most other state officers: a council of John D. Gordan, III, do to improve the quality of appointment consisting of the governor and four Vice President his state’s judges? “Nothing” senators. However, fearing that the war doubtless would have been would delay the election of a governor Frances Murray, the answer given by most Secretary and senators and anxious for the new lawyers who practiced in New courts to start work, the delegates York City in the early twen- Stephen P. Younger, named the judicial officers imme- tieth century. But Charles C. Treasuer diately, with the proviso that they Burlingham, generally known Marilyn Marcus, ‘John Jay, by B.B.E.’, one of the earliest Executive Director portraits of Jay, by an artist now known only by his initials. BOARD OF TRUSTEES: Helaine M. Barnett would only continue to serve if con- Barbara A. Brinkley firmed by the council of appointment at its first session.
  • Speaker Biographies

    Speaker Biographies

    Speaker Biographies Ope Adebanjo ’20, Student, Harvard Law School Ope Adebanjo is a second year JD Candidate at Harvard Law School. She graduated from Harvard College in 2015 and majored in Comparative Literature and African Studies, with a minor in Sociology and a citation in Yoruba. Ope worked as an operations supervisor at McMaster-Carr Supply Company in Atlanta GA, managing teams of e-commerce and sales representatives and managing warehouse projects and operations during her time before law school. She also has her Masters in International Business from J. Mack Robinson College of Business at Georgia State University. As a HLS student, Ope is interested in intellectual property law and international business law with a focus on the intersection of policy and technology. Kendra Albert ’16, Clinical Instructional Fellow, Cyberlaw Clinic, Harvard Law School Kendra is a clinical instructional fellow at the Cyberlaw Clinic at Harvard Law School, where they teach students how to practice law by working with pro bono clients. Previously, they were an associate at Zeitgeist Law PC, a boutique technology law firm in San Francisco, and a research associate at the Berkman Klein Center for Internet and Society. Kendra’s scholarship and academic work touches on diverse issues, from online harassment to linkrot to video game preservation. They hold a JD cum laude from Harvard Law School and a bachelor’s degree in lighting design and history from Carnegie Mellon University. Julie Anna Alvarez ’88, Director of Alumni and International Career Services, Columbia Law School Julie Anna Alvarez is the Director of Alumni and International Career Services at Columbia Law School’s Office of Career Services and Professional Development.
  • Is There a Confirmation Mess--An Analysis of Professor Stephen

    Is There a Confirmation Mess--An Analysis of Professor Stephen

    REVIEW ESSAY Is There a Confirmation Mess? An Analysis of Professor Stephen Carter's Critique of the Federal Appointments Process THE CONFIRMATION MESS: CLEANING UP THE FEDERAL APPOINTmENTS PROCESS. By Stephen L. Carter.n New York: Basic Books, 1994. Pp. xiii, 252. $28.00 cloth. Reviewed by Michael A. Kahn+ INTRODUCTION The key to understanding Yale Law Professor Stephen Carter's book, The Confirmation Mess, is the dedication of the book: "For Thurgood Marshall." Carter reveres Marshall (for whom he clerked) and describes Marshall with unrestrained praise and admiration.1 Carter believes (cor- rectly) that Marshall was unfairly harassed and vilified during his 1967 con- firmation hearing (pp. 3-5); and, more significantly, Carter opines that if Marshall were nominated today he might not be confirmed because he would have "too much baggage, too many eccentricities, too many ene- mies" (p. 4) and therefore would be disqualified in the court of public opin- ion. Indeed, Carter believes "[t]he chances are... that under today's silly rules, the nomination would have been withdrawn" (p. 4). To Professor Carter, the idea that the magnificent Thurgood Marshall might be denied a seat on the Supreme Court is blasphemy and clearly indicates that the sys- tem by which we select and confirm Supreme Court Justices badly needs fixing (p. 5).2 I do not agree with Carter's gloomy prognostication about a hypotheti- cal 1990s nomination of Thurgood Marshall to the Supreme Court. I believe that were he considered today, Marshall would be nominated and confirmed. More importantly, I do not agree with Carter's assessment that Copyright © 1995 California Law Review, Inc.
  • Nannygate": Untangling U.S

    Nannygate": Untangling U.S

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Indiana University Bloomington Maurer School of Law Indiana Law Journal Volume 70 | Issue 1 Article 10 Winter 1994 A Response to "Nannygate": Untangling U.S. Immigration Law to Enable American Parents to Hire Foreign Child Care Providers Kathleen A. Delaney Indiana University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj Part of the Family Law Commons, and the Immigration Law Commons Recommended Citation Delaney, Kathleen A. (1994) "A Response to "Nannygate": Untangling U.S. Immigration Law to Enable American Parents to Hire Foreign Child Care Providers," Indiana Law Journal: Vol. 70 : Iss. 1 , Article 10. Available at: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol70/iss1/10 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Response to "Nannygate": Untangling U.S. Immigration Law to Enable American Parents to Hire Foreign Child Care Providers KATHLEEN A. DELANEY* INTRODUCTION On January 22, 1993, Zod Baird, responding to public and media pressure generated by her employment of illegal immigrants, withdrew from consider- ation as President Clinton's nominee for United States Attorney General.' Weeks later, President Clinton's replacement candidate for Attorney General, Kimba Wood, withdrew from consideration after revealing that she, too, had a "nanny problem."2 The media paid a great deal of attention to these events, and dubbed the scandal "Nannygate.

  • Speaker Biographies

    Speaker Biographies Ope Adebanjo ’20, Student, Harvard Law School Ope Adebanjo is a second year JD Candidate at Harvard Law School. She graduated from Harvard College in 2015 and majored in Comparative Literature and African Studies, with a minor in Sociology and a citation in Yoruba. Ope worked as an operations supervisor at McMaster-Carr Supply Company in Atlanta GA, managing teams of e-commerce and sales representatives and managing warehouse projects and operations during her time before law school. She also has her Masters in International Business from J. Mack Robinson College of Business at Georgia State University. As a HLS student, Ope is interested in intellectual property law and international business law with a focus on the intersection of policy and technology. Kendra Albert ’16, Clinical Instructional Fellow, Cyberlaw Clinic, Harvard Law School Kendra is a clinical instructional fellow at the Cyberlaw Clinic at Harvard Law School, where they teach students how to practice law by working with pro bono clients. Previously, they were an associate at Zeitgeist Law PC, a boutique technology law firm in San Francisco, and a research associate at the Berkman Klein Center for Internet and Society. Kendra’s scholarship and academic work touches on diverse issues, from online harassment to linkrot to video game preservation. They hold a JD cum laude from Harvard Law School and a bachelor’s degree in lighting design and history from Carnegie Mellon University. Julie Anna Alvarez ’88, Director of Alumni and International Career Services, Columbia Law School Julie Anna Alvarez is the Director of Alumni and International Career Services at Columbia Law School’s Office of Career Services and Professional Development.
  • Download the Transcript

    Download the Transcript

    1 UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING Thursday, July 9, 2009 The public hearing convened in the United States Court of International Trade, One Federal Plaza, New York, New York, at 8:40 a.m., Ricardo H. Hinojosa, Acting Chair, presiding. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: RICARDO H. HINOJOSA, Acting Chair WILLIAM B. CARR, JR., Vice Chair RUBEN CASTILLO, Vice Chair WILLIAM K. SESSIONS, III, Vice Chair DABNEY L. FRIEDRICH, Commissioner BERYL A. HOWELL, Commissioner JONATHAN WROBLEWSKI, Commissioner STAFF PRESENT: JUDITH W. SHEON, Staff Director BRENT NEWTON, Deputy Staff Director 2 INDEX JULY 9, 2009 PAGE OPENING REMARKS Hon. Ricardo H. Hinojosa............. 3 VIEW FROM THE APPELLATE BENCH Hon. Jon O. Newman................... 18 Hon. Brett M. Kavanaugh.............. 30 Hon. Jeffrey R. Howard............... 45 Hon. D. Michael Fisher............... 58 VIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT BENCH Hon. Richard J. Arcara............... 100 Hon. John A. Woodcock, Jr. .......... 118 Hon. Denny Chin ..................... 126 VIEW FROM THE PROBATION OFFICE William Henry........................ 167 Michael Fitzpatrick.................. 174 C. Warren Maxwell.................... 183 Wilfredo Torres...................... 195 VIEW FROM THE DEFENSE BAR Alexander Bunin...................... 211 Michael S. Nachmanoff................ 226 Robert Mann.......................... 249 VIEW FROM THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH Benton J. Campbell................... 287 Dana J. Boente....................... 306 3 ACTING CHAIR HINOJOSA: Good morning. It is a special honor for me on behalf of the United States Sentencing Commission to welcome you to the third in a series of regional public hearings that we are having across the country with regards to the 25th anniversary of the passage of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. We are extremely happy to be here at the Court of International Trade in New York City.
  • Dinner Journal

    Dinner Journal

    Hon. William C. Conner Inn of Court Reception and Dinner January 19, 2010 The Union League Club of New York In Memoriam On behalf of the Officers and Executive Committee of the Hon. William C. Conner Inn of Court, it is with great sadness that we report the pass- ing of the Hon. William C. Conner on July 9, 2009. He was 89. Judge Conner served his country with distinction as a United States District Court Judge of the Southern District of New York for over 35 years. He was a valued member of our IP community as a patent attor- ney (1946-73), as a past president of the New York Intellectual Property Law Association (1972-73), then known as the New York Patent Law Association, and most recently as emeritus and active judicial partici- pant in our Conner Inn of Court. He will be deeply missed. Tributes to Judge Conner have been collected and posted on the Con- ner Inn website at www.connerinn.org. Judge William C. Conner Mission of the Hon. William C. Conner Inn of Court The mission of the Hon. William C. Conner Inn of Court is to promote excellence in professionalism, ethics, civility, and legal skills for judges, lawyers, academicians, and students of law and to advance the education of the members of the Inn, the members of the bench and bar, and the public in the fields of intellectual property law. Program w w w Cocktail Reception • 6:00 pm w w w w w w Dinner • 7:00 pm w w w w w w Welcome w w w Anthony Giaccio w w w Presentations w w w Conner Inn Excellence Award to Chief Judge Loretta A.