Scarlet Under Scrutim] Imo Us
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Many Faces of Mexico. INSTITUTION Resource Center of the Americas, Minneapolis, MN
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 392 686 ( SO 025 807 AUTHOR Ruiz, Octavio Madigan; And Others TITLE Many Faces of Mexico. INSTITUTION Resource Center of the Americas, Minneapolis, MN. REPORT NO ISBN-0-9617743-6-3 PUB DATE 95 NOTE 358p. AVAILABLE FROM ResourceCenter of The Americas, 317 17th Avenue Southeast, Minneapolis, MN 55414-2077 ($49.95; quantity discount up to 30%). PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Use Teaching Guides (For Teacher)(052) Books (010) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC15 Plus Postage. .DESCRIPTORS Cross Cultural Studies; Foreign Countries; *Latin American Culture; *Latin American History; *Latin Americans; *Mexicans; *Multicultural Education; Social Studies; United States History; Western Civilization IDENTIFIERS *Mexico ABSTRACT This resource book braids together the cultural, political and economic realities which together shape Mexican history. The guiding question for the book is that of: "What do we need to know about Mexico's past in order to understand its present and future?" To address the question, the interdisciplinary resource book addresses key themes including: (1) land and resources;(2) borders and boundaries;(3) migration;(4) basic needs and economic issues;(5) social organization and political participation; (6) popular culture and belief systems; and (7) perspective. The book is divided into five units with lessons for each unit. Units are: (1) "Mexico: Its Place in The Americas"; (2) "Pre-contact to the Spanish Invasion of 1521";(3) "Colonialism to Indeperience 1521-1810";(4) "Mexican/American War to the Revolution: 1810-1920"; and (5) "Revolutionary Mexico through the Present Day." Numerous handouts are include(' with a number of primary and secondary source materials from books and periodicals. -
Alpha Chi Sigma Fraternity Sourcebook, 2013-2014 This Sourcebook Is the Property Of
Alpha Chi Sigma Sourcebook A Repository of Fraternity Knowledge for Reference and Education Academic Year 2013-2014 Edition 1 l Alpha Chi Sigma Fraternity Sourcebook, 2013-2014 This Sourcebook is the property of: ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ Full Name Chapter Name ___________________________________________________ Pledge Class ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ Date of Pledge Ceremony Date of Initiation ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ Master Alchemist Vice Master Alchemist ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ Master of Ceremonies Reporter ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ Recorder Treasurer ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ Alumni Secretary Other Officer Members of My Pledge Class ©2013 Alpha Chi Sigma Fraternity 6296 Rucker Road, Suite B | Indianapolis, IN 46220 | (800) ALCHEMY | [email protected] | www.alphachisigma.org Click on the blue underlined terms to link to supplemental content. A printed version of the Sourcebook is available from the National Office. This document may be copied and distributed freely for not-for-profit purposes, in print or electronically, provided it is not edited or altered in any -
Published United States Court of Appeals for The
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ASHLEY FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, A Wisconsin corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SANGIACOMO N. A. LIMITED, a New No. 98-2228 Jersey Corporation; CARLO BARGAGLI-STOFFI, Defendants-Appellees. DREXEL HERITAGE FURNITURE COMPANY, Amicus Curiae. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr. Chief District Judge. (CA-97-309-2) Argued: May 18, 1999 Decided: August 10, 1999 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. _________________________________________________________________ Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge Motz wrote the opinion, in which Judge Michael and Judge King joined. _________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL ARGUED: D. David Hill, MCANDREWS, HELD & MALLOY, LTD., Chicago, Illinois, for Appellant. Gilbert Julian Andia, Jr., RHODES, COATS & BENNETT, L.L.P., Greensboro, North Caro- lina, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: John J. Held, Thomas J. Wimbiscus, MCANDREWS, HELD & MALLOY, LTD., Chicago, Illinois, for Appellant. C. Robert Rhodes, James L. Lester, RHODES, COATS & BENNETT, L.L.P., Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees. Ste- phen M. Trattner, John J. Dabney, TRATTNER & ASSOCIATES, Washington, D.C., for Amicus Curiae. _________________________________________________________________ OPINION DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge: This case requires us to determine under what circumstances the configuration of a product can constitute inherently distinctive trade dress that is protectable under federal law. Because we conclude that a product's configuration qualifies as inherently distinctive trade dress if it is capable of functioning as a designator of an individual source of the product, we reverse the contrary ruling of the district court and remand for further proceedings. I. -
ACCT 350 Casebook
CASEBOOK LAW AND SOCIAL ISSUES IN BUSINESS ACCT 352; Section 052 Department of Accounting University of Delaware Fall 2014 © Sheldon D. Pollack revised: 9/9/14 Table of Contents I. Jurisdiction of the Courts Sierra Club v. Morton 4 World-Wide Volkswagen Corp v. Woodson 7 Carnival Cruise v. Shute 10 Erie Railroad v. Tompkins 13 Wendelken v. Superior Court 15 Ferolito v. Johnson & Johnson 18 II. Constitutional Law U.S. v. Darby 21 U.S. v. Lopez 24 Cohen v. California 27 III. Intentional Torts Perna v. Pirozzi 32 Hustler Magazine & Larry C. Flynt v. Falwell 35 Roach v. Stern 38 IV. Unintentional Torts Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad 43 Fischer v. Pepsi 46 Schick v. Ferolito 38 V. Product Liability Nowak v. Faberge 53 Elsroth v. J&J 56 VI. Intellectual Property Vanna White v. Samsung 62 Saderup v. Comedy III Productions 66 Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music 68 Two Pesos v. Taco Cabana 72 Ty, Inc. v. GMA 74 VII. Contract Law Dines v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 79 Lucy v. Zehmer 81 City of Everett v. Mitchell 84 Lefkowitz v. Great Minneapolis Store, Inc. 86 Mesaros v. United States 88 Soldau v. Organon Inc. 91 Alden v. Presley 92 Hamer v. Sidway 95 Jones v. Free Flight 98 Flood v. Fidelity 101 Ryno v. Tyra 104 Zivich v. Mentor 106 Sutton v. Warner 109 Doherty v. Doherty Insurance Agency, Inc. 112 Parker v. 20th Century Fox 115 C & H v. Sun Ship 118 O’Neill v. Gallant 121 Hadley v. Baxendale 124 Super Valu Stores v. -
The Drama of Bioterror: Paranoia and the Rhetoric of Defense
THE DRAMA OF BIOTERROR: PARANOIA AND THE RHETORIC OF DEFENSE By George Huston Gittinger BA, Tulane University, 2002 MA, University of Pittsburgh, 2011 MA, University of Pittsburgh, 2013 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Communication University of Pittsburgh 2014 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH THE DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by George Huston Gittinger It was defended on November 15, 2014 Dr. Heather Douglas, Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy Dr. Olga Kuchinskaya, Assistant Professor, Department of Communication Dr. Gordon Mitchell, Associate Professor, Department of Communication Dr. John Poulakos, Associate Professor, Department of Communication Dissertation Director: Dr. John Lyne, Professor, Department of Communication ii Copyright © by George Huston Gittinger 2014 iii THE DRAMA OF BIOTERROR: PARANOIA AND THE RHETORIC OF DEFENSE George Huston Gittinger, Ph. D. University of Pittsburgh, 2014 This study provides an account of how a rhetoric of bioterrorism developed and investigates its consequences. Currently, two competing ways of talking about bioterror, the skeptical and the paranoid, have been obscured because biosecurity researchers infrequently consider how particular historical and imagined events come to be defined as examples of bioterrorism. These rhetorical styles and their associated attitudes responded to a recurring problem in the history of biothreats – that there is rarely enough evidence to give clear accounts of the presence and origin of particular threats. As a result, conjectures become part of a unified history of bioterror, washing out the actual complexity of describing these rare events. -
Who Sank the Khaki Submarine at Stanford? a Study of Decision-Making at Stanford University
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 107 191 HE 006 587 AUTHOR Keserer, Frank B.; And Others TITLE Who Sank The Khaki Submarine At Stanford? A Study of Decision-Making At Stanford University. PUB DATE .73 NOTE 63p. FDRS PRICE MF-$0.76 HC-$3.32 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS Academic Freedom; *Decision Making; Faculty; *Governance; Governing Boards; *Higher Education; Military Science; Military Training; *Policy Formation; *Power Structure; Presidents; Research; Students; Trustees IDENTIFIERS ROTC; *Stanford University ABSTRACT From the late 1960s to the spring of 1970 there vas an acceleration of anti -war protest and political movements. At Stanford University this period was characterized by controversy, deep divisions within the university community, disruption of classes, student strikes, and the presence of uniformed police on campus. In this environment of turbulence and violence, a major decision vas reached to remove ROTC from Stanford. It was a decision that raised questions concerning the legitimacy of the governing role of the board of trustees, the president, the faculty and the students. It caused a crisis in the decision-Raking process and an altering of the power structure of the university. It extended beyond the single topic of ROTC, beyond the question of legitimate authority, to include such matters as the ethics of classified research, rivalry between academic disciplines, and the very fundamental question of acadesic freedom. This document attempts to identify and analyze, from a political perspective, the decision-making process that produced the "ROTC decision,* It begins With an exploration of the Stanford decision-making system and proceeds to describe the *political perspective.* (Author/KM * r WHO SANK THE KHAKI SUBMARINE AT STANFORD? A STUDY OF DECISION-MAKING AT STANFORD UNIVERSITY By Frank R. -
Chapter Four Making Light of the Light Elements
Chapter Four Making Light of the Light Elements Although itself a significant technical obstacle to the H-bomb project, Los Alamos found computing as only one of several critical problems. Other problems arose, as well, and weapons scientists acknowledged them at various times. Von Neumann, Teller, Wheeler and others early on established computing as a technical problem that stood in the way of understanding the Super configuration’s feasibility. Nuclear materials were also a bottleneck to the hydrogen weapon program, yet Los Alamos’s scientists recognized this problem later than they had the computing obstacle. Tritium in particular, from the time Konopinski had suggested incorporating this isotope into the Super theory, was a latent obstacle to the H-bomb program. After the Soviet Union detonated its first atomic weapon in 1949 tritium scientists began to view tritium as a serious critical problem facing the American thermonuclear project. Although the Russian A-bomb test represented in the United States a political event outside of the AEC technological system -- this event nevertheless forced both scientists and policymakers to reconsider the AEC’s pace and the intensity of nuclear weapons research. Only then the Commission called its materials production facilities into question. After President Truman instructed the AEC to explore further the hydrogen weapon in 1950, and when Ulam and his colleague’s calculations began to 174 show the ignition problems facing the Super, the tritium problem became blatant. Consequently, the Committee for Weapon Development demonstrate with reasonable certainty that the 1945-1946 ENIAC calculations were wrong. In 1949 the AEC found itself unprepared to begin a program of large- scale tritium production in part because its predecessor, the MED, had not constructed any facilities specifically for this purpose. -
The LPI Celebrates 40 Years!
TThehe LPILPI CelebratesCelebrates 4040 Years!Years! — Renee Dotson, LPI Staff Writer This year, the Lunar and Planetary Institute (LPI) is proud to celebrate its 40th anniversary. Since its inception, the Institute has focused its efforts on cultivating and supporting a community of scientists who lead interdisciplinary research efforts, and remains strongly committed to its service role for the science community and the public. While we look toward the future, we also recognize our past, and would like to take this opportunity to revisit some of the people and events that have shaped the course of the Institute’s history. The idea for the Institute was actually conceived in the mid-1960s. As NASA was aggressively working toward the goal of realizing President John F. Kennedy’s desire to land a man on the Moon by the end of the decade, NASA Administrator James Webb recognized the need to actively engage the academic community in its efforts. At Webb’s request, Dr. Frederick Seitz, President of the National Academy of Science (NAS), met with representatives of 49 universities to establish a Committee on NASA/University Relations. In July 1967, this Committee began to meet under the chairmanship of Dr. Kenneth Pitzer, President of Rice University, and the concept of a Lunar Science Institute developed out of frequent exchanges between NAS and NASA. On March 1, 1968, President Lyndon B. Johnson visited the Manned Spacecraft Center (MSC) in Houston, Texas (now the Johnson Space Center). After thanking and congratulating the men and women of MSC for the work they were carrying forward, Johnson made the following pronouncement: LWe are close to a landing on the Moon. -
Kenneth Pitzer Papers
http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt7j49s2px No online items Guide to the Kenneth Pitzer Papers Daniel Hartwig Stanford University. Libraries.Department of Special Collections and University Archives Stanford, California October 2010 Copyright © 2015 The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. All rights reserved. Note This encoded finding aid is compliant with Stanford EAD Best Practice Guidelines, Version 1.0. Guide to the Kenneth Pitzer SC0087 1 Papers Overview Call Number: SC0087 Creator: Pitzer, Kenneth S., (Kenneth Sanborn), 1914-1997 Title: Kenneth Pitzer papers Dates: 1968-1980 Bulk Dates: 1968-1970 Physical Description: 4 Linear feet Summary: Papers include correspondence, press releases and articles relating to Dr. Pitzer's appointment to and resignation from the presidency of Stanford; his chron files; subject files; and appointment book (Aug. 1969-Aug. 1970). Language(s): The materials are in English. Repository: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford, CA 94305-6064 Email: [email protected] Phone: (650) 725-1022 URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Gift of Kenneth Pitzer, 1970, and Bancroft Library, 1998. Information about Access This collection is open for research. Ownership & Copyright All requests to reproduce, publish, quote from, or otherwise use collection materials must be submitted in writing to the Head of Special Collections and University Archives, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, California 94304-6064. Consent is given on behalf of Special Collections as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission from the copyright owner. Such permission must be obtained from the copyright owner, heir(s) or assigns. -
Oral History of Edward S. Davidson (1939-‐ )
Oral history of Edward S. Davidson (1939- ) Interviewed by Prof. Paul N. Edwards, University of Michigan School of Information, at Davidson's home in Ann Arbor, Michigan June 17-18 and September 29, 2009 Edward S. Davidson is a computer engineer who pioneered pipelining techniques for improving processor throughput in both hardware and software. Techniques to which he contributed seminal ideas include simulated annealing, wave pipelining, multiple instruction stream pipelines, decoupled access-execute architecture, and polycyclic scheduling (aka software pipelining). Born in 1939, Davidson grew up in the greater Boston area. He saw his first computer on a high school math class field trip and "knew then and there" that he wanted to enter the field. Davidson received his bachelor's degree in mathematics from Harvard University in 1961, having taken virtually all of the university's computer courses. He next attended the University of Michigan (1961-62). There he obtained an MS in the Communication Sciences program, which featured a broad intellectual range running from cybernetics and neuroscience to computing. Davidson worked for Honeywell as a logic design engineer from 1962-1965, acquiring considerable experience with circuit optimization. From 1965-1968 he attended the PhD program in Electrical Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). He then moved to Stanford University, where he served as an assistant professor from 1968-1973 and started a logic design laboratory. In 1973 he returned to UIUC, where he remained until 1987. During that period he worked in the Coordinated Science Laboratory (1973-1980), served as President of Illinois Computer Research, Inc. -
Protection of Inherently Distinctive Trade Dress Under Lanham Act Does Not Require Proof of Secondary Meaning Susan L
University of Baltimore Law Forum Volume 23 Article 13 Number 2 Fall, 1992 1992 Recent Developments: Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.: Protection of Inherently Distinctive Trade Dress under Lanham Act Does Not Require Proof of Secondary Meaning Susan L. Oliveri Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/lf Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Oliveri, Susan L. (1992) "Recent Developments: Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.: Protection of Inherently Distinctive Trade Dress under Lanham Act Does Not Require Proof of Secondary Meaning," University of Baltimore Law Forum: Vol. 23 : No. 2 , Article 13. Available at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/lf/vol23/iss2/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Baltimore Law Forum by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A jury in the Circuit Court for Bal Reddick requested that the court va from the sentence; otherwise, it would timore City convicted Raymond cate his entire sentence because of the imprison Reddick for a longer term Frances Reddick ("Reddick") and unconstitutional conditional offer to thana similarly situated defendant with Harvey Lee Southall of second degree suspend five years ofhis sentence ifhe the financial capability to make the murder and the unlawful use ofa hand paid the victim's family $3,000. payment. Id. at 274, -
Scientists and the Decision to Build the Superbomb, 1952-1954
In Any Light: Scientists and the Decision to Build the Superbomb, 1952-1954 Author(s): Peter Galison and Barton Bernstein Source: Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, Vol. 19, No. 2 (1989), pp. 267-347 Published by: University of California Press Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27757627 Accessed: 09-09-2019 20:44 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms University of California Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences This content downloaded from 206.253.207.235 on Mon, 09 Sep 2019 20:44:00 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms PETER GALISON* AND BARTON BERNSTEIN** In any light: Scientists and the decision to build the Superbomb, 1952-1954 If the development [of the hydrogen bomb] is possible, it is out of our powers to prevent it. All that we can do is to retard its completion by some years. I believe, on the other hand, that any form of international control may be put on a more stable basis by the knowledge of the full extent of the problem that must be solved and of the dangers of a ruth less international competition.