The Population Dynamics of Tansy Ragwort (Senecio Jacobaea) In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Population Dynamics of Tansy Ragwort (Senecio Jacobaea) In THE POPULATION DYNAMICS OF TANSY RAGWORT (SENECIO JACOBAEA) IN NORTHWESTERN MONTANA by Brad David Bauer A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Land Resources and Environmental Sciences MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana February 2006 ©COPYRIGHT by Brad David Bauer 2006 All Rights Reserved ii APPROVAL of a thesis submitted by Brad David Bauer This thesis has been read by each member of the thesis committee and has been found to be satisfactory regarding content, English usage, format, citations, bibliographic style, and consistency, and is ready for submission to the College of Graduate Studies. Dr. Bruce D. Maxwell Approved for the Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences Dr. Jon M. Wraith Approved for the College of Graduate Studies Dr. Joseph Fedock iii STATEMENT OF PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master’s degree at Montana State University, I agree that the Library shall make it available to borrowers under rules of the Library. If I have indicated my intention to copyright this thesis by including a copyright notice page, copying is allowable only for scholarly purposes, consistent with “fair use” as prescribed in the U.S. Copyright Law. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this thesis in whole or in parts may be granted only by the copyright holder. Brad David Bauer February 6, 2006 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I express my gratitude to my advisor, Dr. Bruce Maxwell. He contacted me in Iowa with an opportunity to study the population dynamics of a plant species I had not hear of, in far away Montana. Dr. Maxwell has provided me guidance, ideas, and insight to this project. He has also shown me what it is to be a good scientist and an interesting person. I also thank members of my advisory committee George Markin, Lisa Rew, Theodore Weaver, and Cathy Zabinski for their help with the initiation of the project, with courses and related work, and with their direction and helpful reviews with my thesis. I thank Meghan Trainor for initiating the first three years of data collection, interpretation, and guidance for continuation of this project. I am grateful for the help Frank Dougher has provided with my many questions regarding GIS and model building, and to Jay Rotella for assistance and much need insight into using R software to construct and use matrix models. Over the course of my study here at MSU I have had the great fortune of meeting and working with many people who have also become my friends. These include my colleagues in the weed ecology lab including Nicole Wagner, Erik Lehnhoff, Charles Repath, Fred Pollnac, Kristin Harwood, Tim Seipel, Mara Johnson, Karin Neff, Amanda Morrison, and Brenda Sanchez. I would also like to thank Canoe Gulch Ranger Station, especially Ann Odor and Rudy Geber, David Friedman of Plum Creek Timber Company, and the Montana DNRC for help in the Kootenai National Forest and providing me a place to conduct my research and to live. Funding for this research was provided by the United States Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, Bozeman, Montana. v TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. REVIEW OF LITERATURE ..............................................................................1 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................1 TANSY RAGWORT .....................................................................................................2 Geographic Range and History....................................................................2 Habitat..........................................................................................................5 Morphology..................................................................................................6 Growth and Development............................................................................7 Reproduction................................................................................................8 Seed Biology................................................................................................9 Dispersal ....................................................................................................10 Seed Germination and Establishment ........................................................11 Economic Significance..............................................................................12 Conventional Management ........................................................................13 Biological Control......................................................................................15 Response to Burning..................................................................................19 Tansy Ragwort in Northwest Montana......................................................20 PRIMARY OBJECTIVES FOR THE PROJECT.................................................................21 Objective 1: Spatial Modeling ...................................................................22 Objective 2: Population Growth Rates ......................................................25 Transition Matrix Models for Plant Populations ...........................25 Matrix Models as Tools .................................................................27 Difference Equations.....................................................................29 Population Viability Analysis (PVA)............................................29 Critiques of PVA............................................................................31 Sensitivity and Elasticity Analysis.................................................32 Objective 3: Population Growth Rate Variability......................................33 Objective 4: Role of Slashpiles..................................................................34 Objective 5: Population Dynamics with Biological Control .....................35 Summary....................................................................................................36 2. DETERMINING THE DISTRIBUTION OF TANSY RAGWORT ACROSS A RANGE OF ENVIRONMENTS.....................................37 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................37 MATERIALS AND METHODS ....................................................................................39 Site Description..........................................................................................39 Transect Selection......................................................................................40 Data Collection..........................................................................................40 Data Analysis.............................................................................................41 RESULTS .................................................................................................................44 vi TABLE OF CONTENTS-CONTINUED Data and Analysis ......................................................................................44 Model .........................................................................................................44 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................50 Management Implications..........................................................................52 3. ESTIMATING POPULATION GROWTH RATES USING DEMOGRAPHIC MODELS TO PRIORITIZE MANAGEMENT OF TANSY RAGWORT.....................................................................53 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................53 MATERIALS AND METHODS ....................................................................................56 Area Description ........................................................................................56 Transition Rates .........................................................................................59 Seed Production .........................................................................................63 Seed Bank ..................................................................................................63 Population Growth Rate.............................................................................65 Elasticity Analysis .....................................................................................66 Lefkovitch Matrix Model...........................................................................67 Statistical Analysis.....................................................................................68 RESULTS .................................................................................................................69 Transition Rates .........................................................................................69 Seed Bank..................................................................................................73 Comparing Mean and Median Transition Rates ........................................76 Population Growth Rates...........................................................................78 Elasticity Analysis.....................................................................................79 Model Validation: Population Growth Rate ..............................................81 Model Validation: Elasticity Analysis.......................................................83 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................84
Recommended publications
  • Appendix B Natural History and Control of Nonnative Invasive Species
    Appendix B: Natural History and Control of Nonnative Invasive Plants Found in Ten Northern Rocky Mountains National Parks Introduction The Invasive Plant Management Plan was written for the following ten parks (in this document, parks are referred to by the four letter acronyms in bold): the Bear Paw Battlefield-BEPA (MT, also known as Nez Perce National Historical Park); Big Hole National Battlefield-BIHO (MT); City of Rocks National Reserve-CIRO (ID); Craters of the Moon National Monument and Preserve-CRMO (ID); Fossil Butte National Monument-FOBU (WY); Golden Spike National Historic Site-GOSP (UT); Grant-Kohrs Ranch National Historic Site-GRKO (MT); Hagerman Fossil Beds National Monument-HAFO (ID); Little Bighorn Battlefield National Monument-LIBI (MT); and Minidoka National Historic Site-MIIN (ID). The following information is contained for each weed species covered in this document (1) Park presence: based on formal surveys or park representatives’ observations (2) Status: whether the plant is listed as noxious in ID, MT, UT, or WY (3) Identifying characteristics: key characteristics to aid identification, and where possible, unique features to help distinguish the weed from look-a-like species (4) Life cycle: annual, winter-annual, biennial, or perennial and season of flowering and fruit set (5) Spread: the most common method of spread and potential for long distance dispersal (6) Seeds per plant and seed longevity (when available) (7) Habitat (8) Control Options: recommendations on the effectiveness of a. Mechanical Control b. Cultural
    [Show full text]
  • Koexistence a Rozdělení Niky U Pavouků Rodu Philodromus
    Masarykova univerzita Přírodovědecká fakulta Ústav botaniky a zoologie Koexistence a rozdělení niky u pavouků rodu Philodromus Diplomová práce Autor: Radek Michalko Brno 2012 Vedoucí DP: doc. Mgr. Stano Pekár Ph.D. 1 Souhlasím s uloţením této diplomové práce v knihovně Ústavu botaniky a zoologie PřF MU v Brně, případně v jiné knihovně MU, s jejím veřejným půjčováním a vyuţitím pro vědecké, vzdělávací nebo jiné veřejně prospěšné účely, a to za předpokladu, ţe převzaté informace budou řádně citovány a nebudou vyuţívány komerčně. V Brně 8.1.2012 ………………………………… Podpis 2 PODĚKOVÁNÍ Zejména bych chtěl poděkovat vedoucímu mé diplomové práce panu docentu Stanu Pekárovi, ţe mi umoţnil pracovat na tomto tématu, za trpělivé vedení a uţitečné rady. Dále bych chtěl velice poděkovat mým rodičům, bez jejichţ osobní a finanční podpory by tato práce nevznikla. Rovněţ bych chtěl poděkovat Lence Sentenské, Evě Líznarové, Pavlovi Šebkovi a Stanovi Korenkovi za podporu a cenné rady všeho druhu. 3 ABSTRAKT Koexistence a rozdělení niky pavouků rodu Philodromus V této diplomové práci byl zkoumán mechanismus umoţňující koexistenci mezi Philodromus albidus, P. aureolus a P. cespitum. Studie probíhala na území významného krajinného prvku U Kříţe v Brně Starém Lískovci. Studované území se skládá ze třech typů biotopů: listnatý les, křoviny a monokultura švestek. Pavouci byli získáváni pomocí sklepávání. U zkoumaných druhů byly porovnávány různé dimenze niky. Prostorová nika byla zkoumána na základě mikro- aţ makrobiotopových preferencí. Trofická nika byla zkoumána na základě velikosti a typu přirozené kořisti a pomocí laboratorních experimentů potravních preferencí. Časová nika byla zkoumána na základě fenologie jednotlivých druhů. Studované druhy se lišily v prostorové a trofické nice.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera : Anthomyiidae)
    Title JAPANESE RECORDS OF ANTHOMYIID FILES (DIPTERA : ANTHOMYIIDAE) Author(s) Suwa, Masaaki Insecta matsumurana. New series : journal of the Faculty of Agriculture Hokkaido University, series entomology, 55, Citation 203-244 Issue Date 1999-03 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/9895 Type bulletin (article) File Information 55_p203-244.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP INSECTA MATSUMURANA NEW SERIES 55: 203-244 MARCH 1999 JAPANESE RECORDS OF ANTIIOMYIID FLIES (DIPTERA: ANTIIOMYIIDAE) By MAsAAKI SUWA Abstract SUWA, M. 1999. Japanese records of anthomyiid flies (Diptera: Anthomyiidae). Ins. matsum. n. s. 55: 203-244. Up to the present 216 species of Anthomyiidae belonging to 29 genera have been recorded from Japan. Of them 42 species (19.4 %) are resticted to Japan in their known distribution. For future discussion on the biogeography, all the known species of the family from Japan are enumerated together with their localities including newly added ones if present. Each species is given the reference which recorded the species for the first time in Japan. New host records or additional information on their biology is given for some species. Author saddress. Systematic Entomology, Faculty ofAgriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-8589 Japan. Contents. Introduction - Japanese records of Anthomyiidae - Acknowledgements - References. Supported by the Special Grant-in-Aid for Promotion of Education and Science in Hokkaido University provided by the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan. 203 IN1RoDucnoN Some anthomyiid species, e.g., Delia platura, Delia antiqua, Pegomya cunicularia and Strobilomyia laricicola, are serious pests to agricultural crops or to coniferous trees, and there have been a lot of reports in applied field on these injurious insects in Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • TANSY RAGWORT Status and Use
    Plant Guide resource, or state agriculture department regarding its TANSY RAGWORT status and use. Additional weed information is available from the PLANTS Web site at plants.usda.gov. Consult Senecio jacobaea L. other related web sites on the Plant Profile for this species Plant Symbol = SEJA for further information. Contributed by: USDA NRCS Montana State Office Description Tansy ragwort is a winter annual, biennial, or short-lived perennial commonly growing between 8-36 inches (20-80 centimeters) tall, but sometimes to heights greater than 6 feet (175-200 centimeters) under optimal conditions. Rigid stems grow singly or in groups from an upright caudex with only the upper half of the stems branching at the inflorescence. Tansy ragwort additionally perennates via fragments of the numerous (50-100/crown) soft, fleshy roots that grow primarily horizontally and penetrate the soil to a maximum depth of 12 inches (30 centimeters). Rosettes, either seedling or root bud in origin, are formed from distinctive stalked basal leaves 2.7-7.9 inches (7-20 centimeters) long, deeply and pinnately lobed with ovate, obovate, or narrow coarsely-toothed segments. Leaves are either glabrous or with loose wooly down on the underside, especially during early development. Rosette leaves generally die back at or before flowering. Stem leaves are deeply bi- or tri-pinnatifid, arranged alternately on the stem and are reduced in size higher on the stem. Middle and upper stem leaves lack a petiole and slightly clasp the stem. Tansy ragwort flowers. Photo by Michael Shephard, USDA Forest Service, available from Bugwood.org Bright yellow, showy flowers arise only on the pedicel ends; outer pedicels are progressively longer than inner Caution: This plant may be weedy or invasive.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Control of Noxious Weeds in Oregon
    Biological Control of What is Biological Weed Control? DALMATIAN TOADFLAX GORSE Linaria dalmatica Ulex europaeus Invasive noxious weeds in Oregon cost millions of dollars It is important to make sure the correct species of biocontrol Key to Biocontrol Agent Status Noxious Weeds in Oregon in economic and environmental damage. Biological agents are released, to use the most effective species, and to Gorse seed weevil control is a tool vegetation managers employ to help The following general information is provided for each document the release and establishment of weed biocontrol Exapion ulicis naturally suppress weed infestations. This pamphlet agents. biocontrol agent. shows many of the common biological agents you may Year: 1956 Distribution: Widespread A guide to common biological Since 1947, 77 species of biocontrol agents have been released Year: Year of introduction. encounter in Oregon. Attack rate: Heavy Control: Good control agents found in Oregon in Oregon against 32 species of targeted weeds. A total of Distribution: Distribution of agent in host infested counties. Collectability: Mass Release No. 100 Classical biological control is the use of selected natural Dalmatian toadflax stem weevil 67 species are established. The majority of the bioagents Widespread >50% Limited <50% Timing: Apr–May Method: Sweep net/ enemies to control targeted weeds. Most of our worst are insects (71), plus three mites, one nematode, and two Mecinus janthiniformis racquet Stage: Adult Comment: No need for Attack rate: noxious weeds originated from other continents. pathogens. Successful projects can generate 15:1 benefit to Percent of plants attacked. Year: 2001 Distribution: Widespread redistribution. Prospective biocontrol agents are thoroughly tested to cost ratios.
    [Show full text]
  • Gondwana Rainforests of Australia State of Conservation Update - April 2020 © Commonwealth of Australia 2020
    Gondwana Rainforests of Australia State of Conservation update - April 2020 © Commonwealth of Australia 2020 Ownership of intellectual property rights Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights) in this publication is owned by the Commonwealth of Australia (referred to as the Commonwealth). Creative Commons licence All material in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence except content supplied by third parties, logos and the Commonwealth Coat of Arms. Inquiries about the licence and any use of this document should be emailed to [email protected]. Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment GPO Box 858 Canberra ACT 2601 Telephone 1800 900 090 Web .gov.au The Australiaenvironmentn Government acting through the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment has exercised due care and skill in preparing and compiling the information and data in this publication. Notwithstanding, the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, its employees and advisers disclaim all liability, including liability for negligence and for any loss, damage, injury, expense or cost incurred by any person as a result of accessing, using or relying on any of the information or data in this publication to the maximum extent permitted by law. Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Outstanding Universal Value ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 48 Issn
    SUMMERIAUTUMN 2005 ISSUE 48 ISSN. 1038 7897 Dear Members, Welcome to 2005 and another issue of towards creative approaches particularly for low Wildlife & Native Plants. May you find much water use or low maintenance gardening in our pleasure in our native flora and fauna, and in the land of extremes. We should make an effort to establishment and management of your garden as work with our climate and our existing natural it undergoes the changes of the seasons. wealth- to be on friendly terms with some of the inhabitants of the bush, or to sit quietly and Thankyou to those that sent me Christmas and enjoy watching the birds' delightful antics and New Year greetings. No doubt you managed to songs. We must appreciate what we have in the spend some time in the garden appreciating the Australian landscape, to re-create areas for fruits of labour, or in relaxing and planning for nature in our very own backyards. the future. Some of you may have undertaken bush walks to appreciate the values of our unique 'Dream the new dreams of creating gardens that Australian flora and fauna. For those, who did make the most of the flowers of autumn, winter manage to get away on holiday, hopehlly the and spring; dream of a summer Tent relaxed weather was kind to you wherever you went, and and cool in a subtle garden of deep shade made that none were caught up in the terrible Tsunami, cool with varied greenery and enlivened with the or bushfires and floods that occumed just before gentle drip and splash of water.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guidecontrol of Weeds
    US Department of Agriculture FOR THE BIOLOGICALFIELD GUIDECONTROL OF WEEDS IN THE NORTHWEST Rachel Winston, Carol Bell Randall, Rosemarie De Clerck-Floate, Alec McClay, Jennifer Andreas and Mark Schwarzländer Forest Health Technology FHTET-2014-08 Enterprise Team May 2014 he Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team (FHTET) was created in T1995 by the Deputy Chief for State and Private Forestry, USDA, Forest Service, to develop and deliver technologies to protect and improve the health of American forests. This book was published by FHTET as part of the technology transfer series. http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/technology/ Cover photos: Aphthona nigriscutis (R. Richard, USDA APHIS), Mecinus spp. (Bob Richard, USDA APHIS PPQ), Chrysolina hypericic quadrigemina, Eustenopus villosus (Laura Parsons & Mark Schwarzländer, University of Idaho), Cyphocleonus achates (Jennifer Andreas, Washington State University Extension) The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326- W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call 202-720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader.
    [Show full text]
  • Tansy Ragwort
    United States Department of Agriculture NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE Invasive Species Technical Note No. MT-24 June 2009 Ecology and Management of Tansy Ragwort (Senecio jacobaea L.) By Jim Jacobs, Invasive Species Specialist and Plant Materials Specialist NRCS, Bozeman, Montana Sharlene Sing, Research Entomologist USFS Rocky Mountain Research Station, Bozeman, Montana Figure 1. A tansy ragwort infested pasture. Photo by Eric Coombs, Oregon Department of Agriculture, available from Bugwood.org Abstract Tansy ragwort, a member of the Asteraceae taxonomic family, is a large biennial or short-lived perennial herb native to and widespread throughout Europe and Asia. Stems can grow to a height of 5.5 feet (1.75 meters), with the lower half simple and the upper half many-branched at the inflorescence. Reproductive stems produce up to 2,500 bright golden-yellow flowers. Capitula (flowerheads) arranged in 20-60 flat-topped, dense corymbs per plant are composed of ray and disc florets; both produce achenes containing a single seed. Rosettes formed of distinctive pinnately-lobed leaves attain a diameter of up to 1.5 feet (0.5 meter). First reported in Montana in 1979 in Mineral County, tansy ragwort has since spread into Flathead, Lincoln, and Sanders Counties. Soils with medium to light textures in areas receiving sufficient rainfall (34 inches or 860 millimeters/year) readily support populations of tansy ragwort. This species is a troublesome weed in decadent pastures, waste areas, clear-cuts and along roadsides. Tansy ragwort produces pyrrolizidine alkaloids - these can be lethal if ingested by cattle, horses and deer, but are less toxic to sheep and goats.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview and Use of Biological Control in Pasture Situations
    Plant Protection Quarterly Vol.8(4) 1993 159 disturbance. Weed taxa that are closely al- lied to economically important plants or Overview and use of biological control in pasture indigenous plants e.g., Poaceae should not be excluded from consideration due situations to the high level of host specificity dem- onstrated by some organisms. Australian D.A. McLaren, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Keith native plants that are weeds outside their Turnbull Research Institute, PO Box 48, Frankston, Victoria 3199, Australia. natural range may also make suitable tar- gets for biological control, particularly where substantial geographical barriers Summary It has been estimated that ragwort exist between their introduced and native A number of successful biological con- populations have been reduced by range. The protocols for conducting such trol programs against pasture weeds are 60–70% through the combined actions of programs are not developed, but require discussed and related to the state of the the cinnabar moth, Tyria jacobaeae (L.), the attention before they should be under- programs in Australia. Factors that af- ragwort flea beetle, Longitarsus jacobaeae taken. fect the establishment of biological con- (Waterhouse) and the ragwort seed fly, The ultimate criteria for the successful trol agents and how biological control Botanophila seneciella (Meade) (Brown control of environmental weeds, regard- can be integrated into pasture manage- 1990). less of the techniques used, should be ment programs are discussed. Biological control of blackberry, Rubus measured as either the level of replace- constrictus Lef & M., has been successful ment of the target infestations with other How successful have biological in Chile where the rust fungus, Phrag- vegetation, or the level of protection pro- control programs been against midium violaceum (Shulz), has signifi- vided to uninfested vegetation by a reduc- pasture weeds? cantly reduced infestations (Oehrens and tion in the rate of spread.
    [Show full text]
  • Tansy Ragwort Removal
    Tansy Ragwort Control Program Cedar River Municipal Watershed 1999 – 2017 Sally Nickelson Watershed Management Division Seattle Public Utilities December 20, 2017 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 1 LEGAL DESIGNATION ................................................................................................................... 1 LIFE HISTORY ............................................................................................................................... 1 SIMILAR SPECIES .......................................................................................................................... 2 BIOLOGICAL CONTROL ................................................................................................................. 3 OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................... 5 METHODS .................................................................................................................................... 6 RESULTS ...................................................................................................................................... 7 DISTRIBUTION AND STATUS 1999 – 2001 ..................................................................................... 7 DISTRIBUTION 2002 - PRESENT..................................................................................................... 7 CONTROL
    [Show full text]
  • State of Conservation Update - April 2020
    Gondwana Rainforests of Australia State of Conservation update - April 2020 State of Conservation – Gondwana Rainforests of Australia – April 2020 Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Outstanding Universal Value ............................................................................................................. 3 Impact of the 2019-2020 fires ........................................................................................................... 4 Extent of the fires .......................................................................................................................... 4 Assessment of ecological impacts of the fires ............................................................................. 13 Variability of fire impact .......................................................................................................... 13 Identifying key species affected .............................................................................................. 19 Threatened ecological communities ....................................................................................... 21 Intersection with other conservation issues ............................................................................... 21 Future of Gondwana Rainforests under climate change ......................................................... 21 Weeds and feral animals ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]