DOCSLIB.ORG

11. C O M P a R IS O N 11.1. Roles of Maya and Sakti with Regard to The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

212 11. COMPARISON 1 1.0. The comparative study of Maya in Advaita Vedanta and Sakti in Kashmir Saivism, chiefly concerns with the comparison of the two theories of creation propounded in these two philosophies. It deals with the topics like, “why, what, how etc.” of the creation and with the relation between matter and consciousness. The subject' why of creation” has always been interesting, no matter how many times it has been answered since the hoary past days from the time of Naciketas'. Paramahansa Yogananda while spread­ ing Yoga in U.S.A., speaks, 'No matter how many times you hear me speak on the subject of why God crcated the world, you will always find something new; through infinite concentration one receives ever new light on this enigma. Somehow, God has all the power of the Universe at His command, but why does He have this power. Why is God God? Why are not you God ? You will rack your brain when you try to think in this way”^ This problem is elaborated in this Chapter on the Section 11.3.1., in the comparison of the t cause of creation with regard to Maya and Sakti. 11.1. Roles of maya and sakti with regard to the prameyas The prameya o f Advaita Vedanta is quiescent consciousness, “never taking any part in any fact or act”. It is frequently termed as witness­ ing consciousness. It is pure which means without having any function, con­ sciousness is as it is in itsell'. It does not function; it simply is by its is*ness or mere existence. The function of observation or witnessing “is supposed on it when it comes in contact with another. Even then it is quiescent, when attraction for the other is generated in it, it becomes the agent-consciousness and loses its quiescence..... Really speaking, it is, under all circumstances. 213 whether in the subject-objcct state or in the objectless state, a contentless state, always quiestent, never taking any part in any fact or act’’^ Whatever other than consciousness is nonexistent, or rriaya. Whereas the prameya of Kashmir Saivism is always reflective. It can never be free from its nature of vibration which is called initiative act of aware­ ness. Spanda or thrill is innate to It. Consciousness is self-deliberative. Sen­ tience or autonomy (vitnarsa) cannot be separated from ^iva. Existence is not free from autonomy, the freedom or the sovereignty. It is the power to know its existence. The Comparison of the states of amani or atmavyapti in the Vadanta and unmani or Sivavyapti in the Saivism as discussed in the Ch. 10.0.3-4, can be presanted here in the following table together with a Com­ parison of the state described in the Patanjala yoga. Name of Freedom Individual Universal State of System from bliss & worldly citta bondage bliss remergence (prati prasava) into prakfti Yoga yes no no not to precincts of Purusa.• Vedanta yes yes no diluted bliss citta is regeneratec Saivism yes yes yes and turns into Cit 214 11.1.1. Niicala and spandax quiescence and vibrating When niaya, as the limiting adjunct or upadhi is removed, the reality according to Advaita Vedanta is observable as silence (santa), niicalatauva or static. It is restful, throbless, unattached, and asanga-iox this reason, it is inactive, harmonious, nirguna or niskriya* satsahgatva nihsangatvam nihsangatve nirmohatvam/ nirmohqtve niscalatattvam ni/calatattve jivan^uktih//^ The state of niscalatattva is possible only by removing all the traces of movement^called nTayS, the duality^from the non-dual state. Since maya is the cause of activity, its removal naturally leads to the Reality which is throbless, vibrationless and free from deliberation, "caitanyam sbsvatam santam vyomatitam niranjonam ". Reality is santa, rather supra^antah*’, su­ premely tranquil in Advaita Vedanta. ^akti on the other hand makes the reality in the advaita Saivism ever vibrating, pulsating, manifesting, reflecting, expressing or deliberating. As the essence or ‘heart’ of the reality (hrdayam paramesthina^), Spada in con­ sciousness is the power of self-awareness, without which consciousness turns to be inert; asthasyad ekarupena vapusAcen mahe/varah/ W maheivaratvam samvilvam tadatyaksadghatadivat// This is the reflective awareness, the will or desire (iksitrtva or unmukhata) of consciousness, the throb (spanda) which manifests itself into the limited being and matter. Consciousness is not away from experience. This concludes that knowledge includes experience. Awareness is not merely a 'noun', but an action within a noun. Mark S.G.Dyczkoski writes in the Doc­ trine o f Vibration: 215 "In the transition fron^ experience to a concept of reality, we oniy carry with us ideas symbolic of the original experience. Philosophy from this point of view, can only serve a descriptive function. It is a systematic symbolism' which serves primarily to generate insight into the nature of reality.... Phi­ losophy is an elaboration of different kinds of spiritual experience. The Ob­ structions of high-grade metaphysics are based on spiritual experience and desire their whole value from the experience they symbolize. No metaphysi­ cal concept is entirely intelligible without reference to the spirit"’. In Indian philosophy, mysticism or experience and metaphysics or theory (of the reality) are blended into one. Theory is experience. It is unlike the Western philosophy where philosopher sits on an armchair just for imagination. That is why the English Dictionaries define ‘theory’ in con­ trast with practice*. Theory Is not siddh'anta as it is translated. Siddhanta is the end of siddha or accomplished act. It no more remains to be verified or observed. Siddhanta is not a saddhya, for activity is implicit in knowledge: "caitanyam atmano rupam siddham jnancnkriyatmakam"^.Thxxs^ when the prameya in Advaita Vedantii is quiscent, it is vibrating in Kashmir Saivism. 11.1.2. Inactivity and activity Owing to the doctrincs of maya and sakti^X\iQ two descriptions of the non-dual Reality forwarded by Advaita Vedanta and Sivadvaita^seem self­ contradictory to each other. It is because one is ni^calatva , suprahanta, A inactive and perfectly equipoised. The other is ever vibrating, pulsating, ac­ tive, manifesting etc. {sadd pancavidhakrtya-karilvam paramatmanah). Apparently though these seem contradictory, infact they are same. In Kashmir Saivism, the reality always pulsates with vibration. Still it is a perfect balance of the two ; prokasa and vimaria, light and delight. 21C Paramahva is blended in one reality which is perfectly harmonious and rests in an equilibrium state. Praka/a or vimar/a is not predominance of _ _ _ / one over other. Rather it i.s tattvatita or paradvaita. Vibration or Sakti de­ scribes the nature of consciousness. “svabhavamavabhasasya vimarsani biduh". The two are blended like the moon and the emitting of its light {candracandrikaoriva). Predominance of one over other causes dissolution and creation. Paramakiva in the state of full awareness is not a thought- construct, but full of experience. "Thought constructs are the products of the power of consciousness, and they are not the products of the objects they represent’’"’. Bliss manifests only when action continues, for creativity is the very Es­ sence of divinity. In the Upanisad this same thing is expressed "isa vasyatnidam sarvant '■ Vasyam " is the activity, the manifestation of the Lord. Action is in sacrifice 0^ / (visarga). It is a Yajna, "visargah karma sangitah’’" . Visarga is the vimarsa o/Siva. It is the abandonment, renunciation, relinquishment or sacrifice which connotes a karma. The action in visarga is bhutabhavodbhavakara— a cre­ ation of elements. It is the abandonment of all activity—sarvarambha parityagl. In the neo-vedanta it is action in relaxation and relaxation in ac­ tion— "karmani akarma and akarmani karma". Therefore, vasyam is the manifestation, or vimar/a of the Lord, who has the power of will {'iksitrtva), the supreme freedom or svatantryasakti. Since the manifestation of the Lord is His body, therefore any dross, dirt or blemish that appears in the action or speech taints his nature of consciousness. Nothing can be taken, nothing could exist, nothing could be extended outside his nature. So, nothing could be­ long outside one’s own consciousness, "ma grdhah kasyasvid dhanam” or tena sabdarthacintasu na savastha na yah sivah/ bhoktaiva bhogyarupena sada sarvatro samsthitah//'-. 217 According to the doctrine of mayavada, all problem arises out of ex­ cess (maya) which makes one restless. Restful condition (^antavastha) is achieved by calming down the excess, by throwing away the unbalanced ones. Thus restful condition or relaxation is obtainable through action. Just the carbon deposited on the plug is thrown away by pulling and pushing a pin into it, similarly the ni/calatattva or calm condition is obtainable by throwing away the tension through vital, physical and emotional activity i.e. by performing yogic postures, pranayatna etc^i.e. by bending the body, mehd- ing the mind and tending (observing) the breath. Action is the manifestatiohof the blissful consciousnessf'wo livah sakti rahito): matter reverberates vtfith energy. The same is also expounded in the kakti-vada. In the Spandavivarana / we find the role of Sakti playing for the cause of a total tranquility. Calm­ ness or permanent peace is the real state of consciousness, Supreme quietness is achievable by destroying the duality (maya) of mental distur­ bances. Such destruction is called liberation from restlessness. It is one’s own real state; “nirvanam nirvrttih dvaitapratyayalakTnaksobhapariksayad alyantiki prasantih samvidcih svasvabhavavyavasthitih'^ . / All the above discussion reveals that the Santabrahmavadin had to accept activity in order to attend the tranquil reality and the Spandasaktivadin had to accept “tranquility” for the ever vibrating supreme reality. The doctrine of spanda clarifies the throbless reality (nispanda tatl\>a) of the Vedantins as discussed in the last pages. The absolute calmness (supraianta or niscalatattva) of the ^anta^brahmaYadin is understood from the doctrine of maya.
Recommended publications
  • Well-Being and Self-Transformation in Indian Psychology Sangeetha Menon National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangalore, India

    Well-Being and Self-Transformation in Indian Psychology Sangeetha Menon National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangalore, India

    International Journal of Transpersonal Studies Volume 37 | Issue 1 Article 4 9-1-2018 Well-being and Self-transformation in Indian Psychology Sangeetha Menon National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangalore, India Shankar Rajaraman National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangalore, India Lakshmi Kuchibotla Private Practice, Bangalore, India Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.ciis.edu/ijts-transpersonalstudies Part of the Philosophy Commons, Psychology Commons, and the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Menon, S., Rajaraman, S., & Kuchibotla, L. (2018). Well-being and self-transformation in Indian psychology. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 37 (1). http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24972/ijts.2018.37.1.13 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals and Newsletters at Digital Commons @ CIIS. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Journal of Transpersonal Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ CIIS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Well-being and Self-Transformation in Indian Psychology Sangeetha Menon Shankar Rajaraman Lakshmi Kuchibotla National Institute of Advanced Studies Private Practice Bangalore, India Bangalore, India This paper uses instances from literature covering a broad spectrum of Indian philosophies, art, medicine and practices—attempts to offer the components of a psychology that is rooted in transformative and transpersonal consciousness. Psychology, in this instance, refers to a systematic study of mind, behavior, and relationship, rather than the formal Western discipline as such. In the Indian approach to understanding consciousness, primary importance is given to the possibility of well-being.
  • Kashmiri Shaivism: a Historical Overview Younus Rashid Youniszaha@Gmail.Com

    Kashmiri Shaivism: a Historical Overview Younus Rashid [email protected]

    Kashmiri Shaivism: A Historical Overview Younus Rashid [email protected] Abstract: Shiva traditions are those whose focus is the deity Shiva and a Shaiva/Shaivite is a Hindu who follows the teachings of Shiva (Sivasana). Kashmiri Shaivism is a system of idealistic monism based on the Shivasutra. This system deals with the three-fold principle of God, Soul, and Matter, it is called Trikasastra or simply Trika. It is a system of ideal Monism founded by Vasugupta. Its central position is that there is only one Ultimate Principle, but this principle has two aspects, one transcendental and the other immanent. The present paper is an attempt to understand the growth and development of Shiva traditions in Kashmir, with special focus on Trikasaivism. The paper shall also make an attempt to explore the diversity of the tradition through the practices and the doctrine. It shall also attempt to show a distinctive religious imaginary that sets Trikasaivism apart from other Indian traditions. Unlike most ancient cultural traditions of India about which we know very little, the culture and history of Kashmir is not completely opaque to the intellectual historian. Especially in Kalhana's Rajatarahgint, written in the 12th century A.D., we have an important quasi-history or near-history of the Kashmir area which provides a valuable and reasonably accurate picture of the social-cultural life of the region from the eighth or ninth centuries onward.1 Prior to eighth century, we know that Kashmir was a centre for Buddhist studies.2 Already in the reign of Asoka in the 3rd century B.C., 1 Larson, Gerald James, “The Aesthetic (Rasāsvadā) and the Religious (Brahmāsvāda) in Abhinavagupta's Kashmir Śaivism”, Philosophy East and West, Vol.
  • Sacred Traditions the Heritage, Philosophy, & History of Yoga by Danny Arguetty

    Sacred Traditions the Heritage, Philosophy, & History of Yoga by Danny Arguetty

    Sacred Traditions The Heritage, Philosophy, & History of Yoga By Danny Arguetty PRE-VEDIC Yoga’s roots began around 2500 BCE on the banks of the Indus River (modern day Pakistan). The Indus Valley Civilization (IVC) flourished in an area of land two times the size of California. The people began as animal herders in countryside villages but over time discovered the rich soil on the flood plains of the Valley. The fertile nutrients generated superior crop yields of cotton, sesame, peas, and barley. Soon two large urban centers Mohenjo-daro and Harappa began to boom enabling the Indus people to trade with neighboring civilizations. The two urban areas continued to thrive for over eight hundred years. Archeologists have extracted many artifacts from the region and among animal statues, pots, coins and tools they found a “square seal depicting a nude male deity with three faces, seated in yogic position on a throne, wearing bangles on both arms and an elaborate headdress. Five symbols of the Indus script appear on either side of the headdress which is made of two outward projecting buffalo style curved horns, with two upward projecting points. A single branch with three papal leaves rises from the middle of the headdress. Seven bangles are depicted on the left arm and six on the right, with the hands resting on the knees. The heels are pressed together under the groin and the feet project beyond the edge of the throne. The feet of the throne are carved with a hoof of a bovine as is seen on the bull and unicorn seals.
  • Shaivism by Dr

    Shaivism by Dr

    Shaivism By Dr. Subhash Chandra Shaivism is one of the major traditions within Hinduism that reveres Shiva as the Supreme Being. The followers of Shaivism are called "Shaivites" or "Saivites". It is one of the largest sects that believe Shiva — worshipped as a creator and destroyer of worlds — is the supreme god over all. The Shaiva have many sub-traditions, ranging from devotional dualistic theism such as Shaiva Siddhanta to yoga-oriented monistic non-theism such as Kashmiri Shaivism. It considers both the Vedas and the Agama texts as important sources of theology. The origin of Shaivism may be traced to the conception of Rudra in the Rig Veda. Shaivism has ancient roots, traceable in the Vedic literature of 2nd millennium BCE, but this is in the form of the Vedic deity Rudra. The ancient text Shvetashvatara Upanishad dated to late 1st millennium BCE mentions terms such as Rudra, Shiva and Maheshwaram, but its interpretation as a theistic or monistic text of Shaivism is disputed. In the early centuries of the common era is the first clear evidence of Pāśupata Shaivism. Both devotional and monistic Shaivism became popular in the 1st millennium CE, rapidly becoming the dominant religious tradition of many Hindu kingdoms. It arrived in Southeast Asia shortly thereafter, leading to thousands of Shaiva temples on the islands of Indonesia as well as Cambodia and Vietnam, co- evolving with Buddhism in these regions. In the contemporary era, Shaivism is one of the major aspects of Hinduism. Shaivism theology ranges from Shiva being the creator, preserver, destroyer to being the same as the Atman (self, soul) within oneself and every living being.
  • The Literature of the Madhyamaka School of Philosophy in India

    The Literature of the Madhyamaka School of Philosophy in India

    A HISTORY OF INDIAN LITERATURE DAVID SEYFORT RUEGG THE LITERATURE OF THE MADHYAMAKA SCHOOL OF PHILOSOPHY IN INDIA OTTO HARRASSOWITZ • WIESBADEN A HISTORY OF INDIAN LITERATURE EDITED BY JAN GONDA VOLUME VII Fasc. 1 1981 OTTO HARRASSOWITZ • WIESBADEN DAVID SEYFORT RUEGG THE LITERATURE OF THE MADHYAMAKA SCHOOL OF PHILOSOPHY IN INDIA 1981 OTTO HARRASSOWITZ • WIESBADEN A HISTORY OF INDIAN LITERATURE Contents of Vol. VII Vol. VII: Buddhist and Jaina Literature Fasc. 1: D. Seyfort Ruegg The Literature of the Madhyamaka School of Philosophy in India CIP-KurztlteTaufnahtne der Deutschen Bibliothek A history of Indian literature / ed. by Jan Gonda. - Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. NE: Gonda, Jan [Hrsg.] Vol. 7. Buddhist and Jaina literature Vol. 7. Fasc. 1. -> Ruegg, David Seyfort: The literature of the Madhyamaka School of Philosophy in India Ruegg, David Seyfort: The literature of the Madhyamaka School of Philosophy in India / David Seyfort Ruegg. — Wiesbaden : Harrassowitz, 1981. (A history of Indian literature ; Vol. 7, Fasc. 1) ISBN 3-447-02204-3 © Otto Hatrassowitz, Wiesbaden 1Q81. Alle Hecate vorbehalteu. Photographische und photomechatusche Wiedergabe nur mit ausdrucklicher Genehmigung des Verlages. Gesamtherstellung: Allgauer Zeitungsverlag GmbH, Kempten. Printed in Germany. Sigel: HIL CONTENTS Introduction 1 The early period: the formation of the Madhyamaka school 4 Nagarjuna 4 Commentaries on Nagarjuna's works 47 Aryadeva 50 Rahulabhadra 54 'Naga' 56 The middle period: the systematization of the Madhyamaka school .. .. 58 Buddhapalita 60 Bhavaviveka
  • Shiva and Durga: Their Real Identity

    Shiva and Durga: Their Real Identity

    8/3/2019 Shiva and Durga Shiva and Durga: Their Real Identity By Stephen Knapp The different Vedic gods have particular roles or functions, and represent or control different forces of nature. Thus, they are not all the same. They all have different meanings and potencies to do particular things in the arrangement and management of the universal creation. In this way, most of them have specific positions and purposes to help facilitate the cause for the creation, maintenance, and even the destruction of the universe. Since our analysis of the Vedic texts indicated that the Bhagavatam was the most ripened fruit of Vedic knowledge, as well as being the commentary of all Vedanta by Srila Vyasadeva Himself, we will include the conclusive descriptions as found in the Bhagavatam to reach our definitive understanding. The most prominent of all the Vedic gods consists of the Trinity of Brahma, Shiva and Vishnu. Brahma assists in creating the world, Vishnu maintains it, and Shiva helps in its annihilation. (I have dealt with this aspect much more extensively in my book, How the Universe Was Created, so I’ll not include that here.) Those that follow the Vedic path, can generally be divided into three main categories; namely those who worship Shiva and are Shaivites, those who worship Shakti or the Goddess and are Shaktas, and those who worship Vishnu, the Vaishnavas. So let’s take a look at who is Lord Shiva and Goddess Durga. * * * One of the most significant of all the Vedic gods is Shiva. And one of the most noted of all the goddesses is Shiva’s wife, Durga.

  • An Analysis of the Relationship Between

    THE POWER OF REFLECTION: AN ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NONDUALISM AND MANIFEST REALITY IN THE WRITTEN WORK OF SWAMI SHANTANANDA by Carol Lynn Schopfer A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Psychology Institute of Transpersonal Psychology Palo Alto, California March 10, 2010 I certify that I have read and approved the content and presentation of this dissertation: _______________________________________________ ____________ Judy Schavrien, Ph.D., Committee Chairperson Date _______________________________________________ ____________ Terry O‘Fallon, Ph.D., Committee Member Date _______________________________________________ ____________ Judith Blackstone, Ph.D., Committee Member Date Copyright © Carol Lynn Schopfer 2010 All Rights Reserved ii Abstract The Power of Reflection: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Nondualism and Manifest Reality in the Written Work of Swami Shantananda by Carol Lynn Schopfer Consciousness has historically been described and evaluated from many different philosophical, spiritual, and scientific perspectives. This dissertation presents a study in the area of nondual consciousness that describes consciousness as a non-plural or indivisible phenomenon. The study looked at the relationship between nondualism and manifest reality in the written work of Swami Shantananda. The discussion of consciousness as a reflexive phenomenon was a key component of this study. This research used a textual content analysis in combination with intuitive inquiry to analyze and describe the major themes of Swami Shantananda‘s commentary on the Pratyabhijna-hrdayam. The Pratyabhijna-hrdayam is a collection of sutras within the Kashmir Shaivist yoga tradition that describes the process by which nondual reality condenses itself into manifest reality. The results of this study defined the following six categories or themes that are prominent within the commentary: vibration, bliss, paradox, creativity, luminosity, and reflection.
  • Encyclopedia-Of-Hinduism-Pt.02.Pdf

    Encyclopedia-Of-Hinduism-Pt.02.Pdf

    Jyoti, Swami Amar 215 J birth and rebirth but remains alive. Most Shaivite Jnanasambanthar See SAMBANTHAR. traditions, and the VEDANTA of SHANKARA, accept the possibility of jivanmukti (living liberation). Other Hindu traditions, such as VAISHNAVISM, do jnana yoga See BHAGAVAD GITA. not accept the concept; they insist that full libera- tion occurs only at death. Neither Jains nor Sikhs believe in jivanmukti. jnanedriya See SAMKHYA. Historically, many of the earlier philosophies of India, such as SAMKHYA, had no place for the idea. A strict reading of YOGA SUTRA would not Jnaneshvara (1275–1296) poet-saint allow for it either. Jnaneshvara was a Vaishnavite (see VAISHNAVISM) poet-saint from Maharashtra, who wrote hymns Further reading: Andrew O. Fort, Jivanmukti in Transfor- of praise to VITHOBA and RUKMINI, the Maha- mation: Embodied Liberation in advaita and Neo-Vedanta rashtran forms of KRISHNA and RADHA who are (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1998). worshipped at Pandharpur. He is most famous for his commentary on the BHAGAVAD GITA writ- ten in old Marathi, a beloved and revered text jivatman See VEDANTA. in Maharashtra. It is said that Jnaneshvara died at the age of 22, at Alandi on the Krishna River. This is now an important pilgrimage site; his jnana shrine is visited there at the time of the poet’s Jnana (from the root jna, “to know”) literally death in November. means “knowledge” but is better translated as “gnosis” or “realization.” Specifically, it is the Further reading: P. V. Bobde, trans., Garland of Divine knowledge of the unity between the highest real- Flowers: Selected Devotional Lyrics of Saint Jnanesvara ity, or BRAHMAN, and the individual self, or JIVATMAN.
  • Kashmir Shaivism

    Kashmir Shaivism

    KKaasshhmmiirr SShhaaiivviissmm PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com Kashmir Shaivism Page Intentionally Left Blank ii KASHMIR NEWS NETWORK (KNN)). PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com Kashmir Shaivism KKaasshhmmiirr SShhaaiivviissmm First Edition, August 2002 KASHMIR NEWS NETWORK (KNN)) iii PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com Kashmir Shaivism Contents page Contents......................................................................................................................................v 1 Introduction......................................................................................................................1-2 2 Shaivistic and Bhakti Roots of Kashmiri Religion............................................................2-3 3 Kashmir Saivism..............................................................................................................3-6 4 Kashmir Saivism and its Echoes in Kashmiri Poetry.........................................................4-9 5 Kashmir Shaivism..........................................................................................................5-13 5.1 Hymn to Shiva Shakti.............................................................................................5-13 5.2 The Chart of Cosmology according to Kashmir Shavism........................................5-14 6 Saivism in Prospect
  • Sri Bhagavan and Kashmir Shaivism Introduction Among the Various

    Sri Bhagavan and Kashmir Shaivism Introduction Among the Various

    Aum Namo Bhagavate Sri Ramanaya Sri Bhagavan and Kashmir Shaivism Introduction Among the various Hindu philosophies, Kashmir Shaivism is one of most famous schools of thought and one of its major philosophical articulations is Pratyabhijña Sastra . Like Advaita Vedanta it is monistic, like Vaishnavism it is theistic, like Yoga it is practical, like Nyaya it is logical as also is appeasing like Buddhism. Therefore, Kashmir Shaivism is considered by scholars as idealistic and realistic in essence, strongly advocating a pragmatic approach to life. Kashmir Shaivism arose during the eighth or ninth century in Kashmir and made significant strides, both philosophical and theological, until the end of the twelfth century. It was householder religion based on a strong monistic interpretation of the Bhairava Tantras (and its subcategory the Kaula Tantras), written by the Kapalikas . Somananda , the first theologian of monistic Shaivism, his disciple Utpaladeva, Abhinavagupta and his disciple, Ksemaraja are celebrated exponents of Kashmir Shaivism. It is philosophically important to distinguish Kashmir Shaivism from the Advaita Vedanta of Upanishads. Both are non-dual philosophies which give primacy to Universal Consciousness (Chit or Brahman). In Kashmir Shaivisim, all things are a manifestation of this Consciousness. Hence, the phenomenal world is real as it has its being in Consciousness (Chit). In comparison, Advaita Vedanta holds Consciousness (Chit) real rejecting the phenomenal world as an illusion (maya). The goal of human birth according to Kashmir Shaivism is to merge in Shiva or Universal Consciousness and realize one's already existing identity with Lord Shiva. Hence it is categorized by various scholars as monistic idealism and also as theistic monism as Liberation [Mukti] is through Lord Shiva.
  • Concept of Manifestation Process in Kashmir Shaivism Mudasir Ahmad Tantray, Tariq Rafeeq Khan and Ifrah Mohi Ud Din Rather

    Concept of Manifestation Process in Kashmir Shaivism Mudasir Ahmad Tantray, Tariq Rafeeq Khan and Ifrah Mohi Ud Din Rather

    Concept of Manifestation Process in Kashmir Shaivism Mudasir Ahmad Tantray, Tariq Rafeeq Khan and Ifrah Mohi ud Din Rather Abstract This paper examines the concept of manifestation process in Kashmir Shaivism from Shiva tattva to Prithvi tattva and their transcendental and immanent predicates (Prakrti and Purusa).This paper also shows that the ultimate reality, Paramshiva, manifests itself into various forms which likely represent the theory of causation. This research paper also provides answer to two questions; First, how ultimate reality with its thirty-six principles or elements manifest in various forms and what types of forms ‘Descent’ attains from the ‘universal self’? Second, how manifestation process takes place from the ‘cosmic self’ (universal consciousness) to a ‘limited self’ (Jiva)? Since, this paper is based on philosophical exploration of manifestation process and contains interpretation and argumentation of Pratyabhijna philosophy only; it excludes manifestation due to Yogas (Upayas) and Karmas. Moreover, it explains the Trika form of reality (Shiva/God, Shakti/World, and Nara/Man) and also the identity between ‘ascent’ and ‘descent’. Manifestation further investigates the union of Shiva and Shakti with Maya and displays its character (Prakashvimarshmaya). This work further tries to describe the contribution of Abhinavagupta in the concept of manifestation. Key terms: Kashmir Shaivism, Manifestation Process, Shiva, Shakti, Abhinavagupta, Tattvas, Pratyabhijna Philosophy, Self. Introduction Kashmir Shaivism is also known as Pratyabhijna philosophy or Trika philosophy. It lays emphasis on three constitutes of reality i.e. Shiva (God), Shakti (world), and Nara (man). It is a philosophy of argumentation and discussion. Manifestation process is a mechanism of appearance (effect) from ultimate reality (cause) which is the seed or embryo of the causation.
  • Hindu Philosophy

    Hindu Philosophy

    HINDU PHILOSOPHY Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com TO MY TEACHER Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com HINDU PHILOSOPHY By THEOS BERNARD, PH.D. PHILOSOPHICAL LIBRARY New York Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com COPYRIGHT, 1947, BY THE PHILOSOPHICAL LIBRARY, INC. I 5 EAST 40TH STREET, NEW YORK, N. Y. PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com PREFACE This book is an attempt to outline the essence of the six classic ,ystems of Hindu Philosophy, namely; Nyaya, Vaise~ika, Samkhya, Yoga, Mimari1sa, and Vedanta. All other schools of thought are but ,ariations of these six. I felt it necessary to present only one additional ;chool, namely Kasmir Saivism which gives the most detailed analysis >f the Ultimate Principle; however, it can hardly be fully understood mtil the other six systems are comprehended. To understand correctly Hindu Philosophy, it is paramount that me realize that the basis of all the schools is the same. Together they :orm a graduated interpretation of the Ultimate Reality. Each school s based on the same metaphysical doctrine, while discussing some Jarticular aspect pf the whole. For example: Nyaya discusses the neans by which knowledge may be had of the Ultimate Reality; Vaise~ika, the things to be known about that Ultimate Reality; ,amkhya, the evolution of metaphysical doctrine; Yoga, the meta­ physical doctrine in relation to the individual; Mima1i1sa, the rules md method of interpreting the doctrine; Vedanta, the relationship Jetween God, Matter, and the world; and Kasmir Saivism, the nature >f the Ultimate Spirit and the Cause of the Initial Impulse.