DOCSLIB.ORG

TCG Guidance for Secure Update of Software and Firmware on Embedded Systems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TCG Guidance for Secure Update of Software and Firmware on Embedded Systems R E TCG Guidance for Secure Update of Software and Firmware on F Embedded Systems E R Version 1.0 Revision 72 E February 10, 2020 N Contact: C [email protected] E Published TCG Guidance for Secure Update of Software and Firmware on Embedded Systems | Version 1.0 | Revision 72 | 2/10/2020 | Published © TCG 2020 TCG Guidance for Secure Update of Software and Firmware on Embedded Systems DISCLAIMERS, NOTICES, AND LICENSE TERMS THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITH NO WARRANTIES WHATSOEVER, INCLUDING ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY, NONINFRINGEMENT, FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR ANY WARRANTY OTHERWISE ARISING OUT OF ANY PROPOSAL, DOCUMENT OR SAMPLE. Without limitation, TCG disclaims all liability, including liability for infringement of any proprietary rights, relating to use of information in this document and to the implementation of this document, and TCG disclaims all liability for cost of procurement of substitute goods or services, lost profits, loss of use, loss of data or any incidental, consequential, direct, indirect, or special damages, whether under contract, tort, warranty or otherwise, arising in any way out of use or reliance upon this document or any information herein. This document is copyrighted by Trusted Computing Group (TCG), and no license, express or implied, is granted herein other than as follows: You may not copy or reproduce the document or distribute it to others without written permission from TCG, except that you may freely do so for the purposes of (a) examining or implementing TCG documents or (b) developing, testing, or promoting information technology standards and best practices, so long as you distribute the document with these disclaimers, notices, and license terms. Contact the Trusted Computing Group at www.trustedcomputinggroup.org for information on document licensing through membership agreements. Any marks and brands contained herein are the property of their respective owners. TCG Guidance for Secure Update of Software and Firmware on Embedded Systems | Version 1.0 | Revision 72 | 2/10/2020 | Published Page 1 © TCG 2020 TCG Guidance for Secure Update of Software and Firmware on Embedded Systems ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The TCG wishes to thank all those who contributed to this specification. This document builds on considerable work done in the various work groups in the TCG. Special thanks to the members of the IoT-SG who participated in the development of this document: NAME AFFILIATION Dean Liberty Advanced Micro Devices Wael Ibrahim American Express Marcus Streets Arm Limited Bill Jacobs Cisco Systems Lukas Jaeger Fraunhofer SIT Monty Wiseman General Electric Company Darren Krahn Google Inc. Graeme Proudler Graeme Proudler Steve Hanna Infineon Technologies Matthew Areno Intel Corporation Sung Lee Intel Corporation Ira McDonald Ira McDonald David Challener Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Lab Adolph Seema Microchip Technology Paul England Microsoft Rob Spiger Microsoft Dick Wilkins Phoenix Technologies Ltd. Jérôme Quévremont Thales Quentin Thareau Thales Raj Pal U.S. Government TCG Guidance for Secure Update of Software and Firmware on Embedded Systems | Version 1.0 | Revision 72 | 2/10/2020 | Published Page 2 © TCG 2020 TCG Guidance for Secure Update of Software and Firmware on Embedded Systems CONTENTS DISCLAIMERS, NOTICES, AND LICENSE TERMS ..................................................................................................... 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................................................................. 2 1 PREFACE ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Purpose ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Scope .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Relationship with Other Standards ................................................................................................................. 5 2 THREAT LANDSCAPE........................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Examples of Attacks ....................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Attacker Motivations and Capabilities ............................................................................................................. 6 3 GUIDANCE ON SOFTWARE / FIRMWARE UPDATE .......................................................................................... 8 3.1 Secure Development ...................................................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Secure Update Signing ................................................................................................................................... 9 3.3 Robust Distribution ........................................................................................................................................ 10 3.4 Secure Update Installation ............................................................................................................................ 11 3.5 Post-Update Verification and Attestation ...................................................................................................... 13 3.6 Threats and Countermeasures ..................................................................................................................... 14 4 HANDLING CONSTRAINED DEVICES AND OTHER CONSTRAINTS ............................................................. 15 4.1 Device Constraints ........................................................................................................................................ 15 4.2 System Constraints ....................................................................................................................................... 16 4.3 Application Requirements ............................................................................................................................. 17 5 SOLUTIONS FOR CONSTRAINED DEVICES .................................................................................................... 18 5.1 Isolation ......................................................................................................................................................... 18 5.2 Generic First Update Engine (FUE) .............................................................................................................. 18 5.3 Firmware Update Latch with First Update Engine ........................................................................................ 23 5.3.1 Capability “Restrict updates to minimal FUE” ..................................................................................... 24 5.3.2 Other Capabilities ................................................................................................................................ 24 5.4 Device Identifier Composition Engine with First Update Engine .................................................................. 24 5.4.1 Capability “Verify updates” .................................................................................................................. 24 5.4.2 Capabilities “Failed update detection” and “Recovery from failed update” ......................................... 25 5.4.3 Capability “Decrypt updates” ............................................................................................................... 25 5.4.4 Capability “Measure and attest” .......................................................................................................... 25 5.5 Trusted Platform Module with First Update Engine ...................................................................................... 25 5.5.1 Capabilities “Decrypt updates” and “Tamper protect critical code & keys” ......................................... 25 5.5.2 Capability “Verify updates” .................................................................................................................. 26 5.5.3 Capabilities “Measure and attest” and “Detect failed updates” ........................................................... 26 TCG Guidance for Secure Update of Software and Firmware on Embedded Systems | Version 1.0 | Revision 72 | 2/10/2020 | Published Page 3 © TCG 2020 TCG Guidance for Secure Update of Software and Firmware on Embedded Systems 5.5.4 Capability “Restrict updates to minimal FUE” ..................................................................................... 27 6 CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................................................................... 28 7 SOLUTION EVALUATION ................................................................................................................................... 29 7.1 Capabilities .................................................................................................................................................... 29 7.1.1 Critical capabilities for platform updates ............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "Putting Trust Into Computing: Where Does It Fit?"
    "Putting Trust Into Computing: Where Does it Fit?" Monday, February 14, 2005 9:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. Copyright© 2005 Trusted Computing Group - Other names and brands are properties of their respective owners. Slide #1 Agenda 09:00am Introduction Jim Ward, IBM, TCG Board President / Chair 09:05am Trusted Network Connect Overview Thomas Hardjono, VeriSign 9:45am Open Source Solutions Dr. Dave Safford, IBM 10:25am Writing and Using Trusted Applications Ralph Engers, Utimaco Safeware AG; George Kastrinakis, Wave Systems; William Whyte, NTRU Cryptosystems, Inc. 11:15am Customer Case Studies Stacy Cannady, IBM; Manny Novoa, HP 11:50am Q&A Mark Schiller, HP; Jim Ward, IBM; Brian Berger, Wave Systems Copyright© 2005 Trusted Computing Group - Other names and brands are properties of their respective owners. Slide #2 Agenda 09:00am Introduction Jim Ward, IBM, TCG Board President / Chair Jim Ward is a Senior Technical Staff Member and security architect within the IBM software group division. Ward has been a core contributor in the security standards space and currently serves as the President and Board Chair of the Trusted Computing Group. Copyright© 2005 Trusted Computing Group - Other names and brands are properties of their respective owners. Slide #3 TCG Mission Develop and promote open, vendor-neutral, industry standard specifications for trusted computing building blocks and software interfaces across multiple platforms Copyright© 2005 Trusted Computing Group - Other names and brands are properties of their respective owners. Slide #4 TCG Board of Directors Copyright© 2005 Trusted Computing Group - Other names and brands are properties of their respective owners. Slide #5 TCG Organization Board of Directors Jim Ward, IBM, President and Chairman, Geoffrey Strongin, AMD, Mark Schiller, HP, David Riss, Intel, Steve Heil, Microsoft, Tom Tahan, Sun, Nicholas Szeto, Sony, Bob Thibadeau, Seagate, Thomas Hardjono, VeriSign Marketing Workgroup Technical Committee Advisory Council Administration Brian Berger, Wave Systems Graeme Proudler, HP Invited Participants VTM, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source TPM Support
    Open Source TPM support Open source application and support software for TPM is available for several operating systems like Linux, Android and in different programming languages supporting the following scenarios: - embedded Systems - servers - mobile communication and portable devices (e.g. tablet computer or smartphone) Open source implementations can also be ported to other platforms and processors and may be act as a starting point for the development of new applications. Some open source projects from the following list are supported by Infineon while other packages are separately developed by independent parties. The following list of Open Source software utilizing Trusted Computing and/or TPM software makes no claim to be complete and represents a limited number of projects: 1. Linux TPM Driver ( http://www.kernel.org ) Linux device driver for Trusted Platform Modules (TPM) in standard kernel (Vanilla). 2. I2C driver for TPM The driver is available on Linux kernel.org ( https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/22/137 ) 3. Trusted GRUB ( http://sourceforge.net/projects/trustedgrub ) Trusted GRUB extends the GRUB bootloader for Linux platforms with TPM support. This makes it possible to provide a secure Bootstrap architecture; Code is in general useful for initializing a Trusted Platform Module and execute integrity measurement based on Trusted Computing. 4. UBoot based on TPM with I2C ( http://git.chromium.org/gitweb/?p=chromiumos/third_party/u- boot.git;a=tree;f=drivers/tpm/slb9635_i2c;hb=chromeos-v2011.03 ) UBoot involving TPM using I2C interface. 5. The TROUSERS project ( http://sourceforge.net/projects/trousers ): An open-source TCG Software Stack implementation created and released by IBM.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Stakeholder Model Revision 3.40
    R E Multiple Stakeholder Model F Published E Family “2.0” R Level 00 Revision 3.40 2 May 2016 E N C Contact: [email protected] E TCG PUBLISHED Copyright © TCG 2012-2016 TCG Published - Multiple Stakeholder Model Copyright TCG Copyright ©2012-2016 Trusted Computing Group, Incorporated. Disclaimer THIS REFERENCE DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITH NO WARRANTIES WHATSOEVER, INCLUDING ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY, NONINFRINGEMENT, FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR ANY WARRANTY OTHERWISE ARISING OUT OF ANY PROPOSAL, WHITE PAPER, OR SAMPLE. Without limitation, TCG disclaims all liability, including liability for infringement of any proprietary rights, relating to use of information in this reference document, and TCG disclaims all liability for cost of procurement of substitute goods or services, lost profits, loss of use, loss of data or any incidental, consequential, direct, indirect, or special damages, whether under contract, tort, warranty or otherwise, arising in any way out of use or reliance upon this document or any information herein. No license, express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, to any TCG or TCG member intellectual property rights is granted herein. Contact the Trusted Computing Group at www.trustedcomputinggroup.org for information on TCG licensing through membership agreements. Any marks and brands contained herein are the property of their respective owners. Page ii TCG PUBLISHED Family “2.0” 2 May 2016 Copyright © TCG 2012-2016 Level 00 Revision 3.40 Published- Multiple Stakeholder Model Copyright TCG Acknowledgments The TCG wishes to thank all those who contributed to this reference document. Ronald Aigner Microsoft Bo Bjerrum Intel Corporation Alec Brusilovsky InterDigital Communications, LLC David Challener Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Lab Michael Chan Samsun Semiconductor Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing Plug and Play Capabilities in Body Area Network Protocols
    Enhancing Plug and Play Capabilities in Body Area Network Protocols A Major Qualifying Project Report: Submitted to the Faculty Of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science By: ____________________________ Ryan Danas ____________________________ Douglas Lally ____________________________ Nathaniel Miller ____________________________ John Synnott Date: March 10, 2014 Approved: ____________________________ Prof. Krishna Kumar Venkatasubramanian, Advisor ____________________________ Prof. Craig A. Shue, Co-Advisor 1 Abstract This project aimed to create a plug-and-play protocol for Body Area Networks (BANs). This protocol enables communication between a diverse number of devices and a base station, regardless of equipment manufacturer. Previous BANs rely on either proprietary software, or protocols that are specialized to the physical device. This protocol takes a more universal approach, allowing any arbitrary device to participate in a BAN without introducing any significant overhead or running cost to the operation of that BAN. Unlike previous approaches, any existing motes and the base station will not have to be updated. Only new devices being added to the BAN will have to implement the protocol before connecting. Our protocol introduces overhead that reduced the performance and lifetime of the motes used in our BAN. 2 Table of Contents Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Trusted Computing
    Grazer Linux Tag 2006 Linux Powered Trusted Computing DI Martin Pirker <[email protected]> DI Thomas Winkler <[email protected]> GLT 2006 - Trusted Live Linux - Martin Pirker + Thomas Winkler, IAIK TU Graz 1 Übersicht ● Einführung und Motivation ● Trusted Computing - Geschichte ● TPM Chips: Hardware, Funktion und Anwendungen ● Chain of Trust ● Kryptografische Schlüssel und Schlüsselverwaltung ● Identitäten ● Attestierung ● Virtualisierung ● Stand der Dinge unter Linux: Treiber, Middleware, Anwendungen GLT 2006 - Trusted Live Linux - Martin Pirker + Thomas Winkler, IAIK TU Graz 2 Einführung ● einschlägige Medien voll mit Meldungen über Sicherheitsprobleme ● ständig neue Initiativen um diese Probleme zu lösen ● ein Ansatz: Trusted Computing von der Trusted Computing Group (TCG) ● bietet Möglichkeit festzustellen welche Software auf einem Computer ausgeführt wird ● soll Vertrauen in Computer erhöhen GLT 2006 - Trusted Live Linux - Martin Pirker + Thomas Winkler, IAIK TU Graz 3 Motivation (1/2) ● bis heute mehrere Millionen Rechner mit TPMs ausgeliefert – wer im Publikum hat schon ein TPM in seinem Rechner? – wer weiß was es kann und verwendet ihn? GLT 2006 - Trusted Live Linux - Martin Pirker + Thomas Winkler, IAIK TU Graz 4 Motivation (2/2) ● viele unklare und teilweise einseitige Medienberichte ● nächstes Microsoft Betriebssystem soll Trusted Computing unterstützen ● welche Perspektiven gibt es im Open Source Bereich? ● Ziele des Vortrags: – welche Technologien stecken hinter Trusted Computing? – verstehen der Wechselwirkungen und Konsequenzen – Anwendung(en) und Nutzen im Open Source Bereich GLT 2006 - Trusted Live Linux - Martin Pirker + Thomas Winkler, IAIK TU Graz 5 Trusted Computing - Organisation ● ursprünglich: TCPA – Trusted Computing Platform Alliance ● jetzt: TCG – Trusted Computing Group ● Führungspositionen (Promotors): – AMD, HP, IBM, Infineon, Intel, Lenovo, Microsoft, Sun ● Abstufungen der Mitgliedschaft bis hin zu akademischen Beobachtern (z.B.
    [Show full text]
  • TRUSTED COMPUTING GROUP (TCG) TIMELINE February 2011
    TRUSTED COMPUTING GROUP (TCG) TIMELINE February 2011 2003 Trusted Computing Group is announced with membership of 14 companies, including Promoters and board members AMD, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Intel Corporation, Microsoft, Sony Corporation and Sun Microsystems, Inc. TCG structure and vision are created to enable extension of trusted computing beyond the PC into the enterprise. TCG adopts existing specifications for the Trusted Platform Module (TPM) security chip for clients and publishes as an open industry specification. 2004 TCG announces the Trusted Platform Module (TPM) specification 1.2. Manufacturers begin shipping a variety of enterprise desktop and notebook PCs equipped with TPMs and software to enable applications including data and file encryption, secure email, single sign-on, storage of certificates and passwords and other applications. Members begin participating in work groups to address security in mobile devices, storage, servers, peripherals and infrastructure requirements. TCG also announces the Trusted Network Connect (TNC) subgroup to work on an open specification for network access control and endpoint integrity and the addition of almost 30 new members to focus on the effort. Group starts to define requirements and use cases for an open specification. Membership expands to 98 companies by end of the year, with participation broadening beyond semiconductor and client companies to software developers, networking and storage companies. The group initiates an advisory council of leading IT, privacy, finance and security industry experts. The group also begins a liaison program with other industry standards groups and begins a mentoring program for those researchers and academic institutions doing research on trusted computing and related topics. 2005 The group expands its board of directors.
    [Show full text]
  • Timing Comparison of the Real-Time Operating Systems for Small Microcontrollers
    S S symmetry Article Timing Comparison of the Real-Time Operating Systems for Small Microcontrollers Ioan Ungurean 1,2 1 Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science; Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, 720229 Suceava, Romania; [email protected] 2 MANSiD Integrated Center, Stefan cel Mare University, 720229 Suceava, Romania Received: 9 March 2020; Accepted: 1 April 2020; Published: 8 April 2020 Abstract: In automatic systems used in the control and monitoring of industrial processes, fieldbuses with specific real-time requirements are used. Often, the sensors are connected to these fieldbuses through embedded systems, which also have real-time features specific to the industrial environment in which it operates. The embedded operating systems are very important in the design and development of embedded systems. A distinct class of these operating systems is real-time operating systems (RTOSs) that can be used to develop embedded systems, which have hard and/or soft real-time requirements on small microcontrollers (MCUs). RTOSs offer the basic support for developing embedded systems with applicability in a wide range of fields such as data acquisition, internet of things, data compression, pattern recognition, diversity, similarity, symmetry, and so on. The RTOSs provide basic services for multitasking applications with deterministic behavior on MCUs. The services provided by the RTOSs are task management and inter-task synchronization and communication. The selection of the RTOS is very important in the development of the embedded system with real-time requirements and it must be based on the latency in the handling of the critical operations triggered by internal or external events, predictability/determinism in the execution of the RTOS primitives, license costs, and memory footprint.
    [Show full text]
  • Rootfs Made Easy with Buildroot
    Kernel Recipes 2013 Rootfs made easy with Buildroot How kernel developers can finally solve the rootfs problem. Thomas Petazzoni Bootlin [email protected] - Kernel, drivers and embedded Linux - Development, consulting, training and support - https://bootlin.com 1/1 Thomas Petazzoni I CTO and embedded Linux engineer at Bootlin I Embedded Linux development: kernel and driver development, system integration, boot time and power consumption optimization, consulting, etc. I Embedded Linux training, Linux driver development training and Android system development training, with materials freely available under a Creative Commons license. I We're hiring! I http://bootlin.com I Contributing the kernel support for the new Armada 370 and Armada XP ARM SoCs from Marvell (widely used in NAS devices). I Major contributor to Buildroot, an open-source, simple and fast embedded Linux build system I Living in Toulouse, south west of France - Kernel, drivers and embedded Linux - Development, consulting, training and support - https://bootlin.com 2/1 Doing kernel development is awesome, but... - Kernel, drivers and embedded Linux - Development, consulting, training and support - https://bootlin.com 3/1 A kernel without a root filesystem is kind of useless input: ImExPS/2 Generic Explorer Mouse as /devices/fpga:07/serio1/input/input1 Root-NFS: no NFS server address VFS: Unable to mount root fs via NFS, trying floppy. VFS: Cannot open root device "(null)" or unknown-block(2,0) Please append a correct "root=" boot option; here are the available partitions: Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(2,0) - Kernel, drivers and embedded Linux - Development, consulting, training and support - https://bootlin.com 4/1 Solutions often used by kernel dev I A complete Linux distribution + Readily available - Large (can hardly be used as an initramfs) - Not available for all architectures - Not easy to customize.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing Embedded Linux Build Systems and Distros
    Comparing embedded Linux build systems and distros Drew Moseley Solutions Architect Mender.io Session overview ● Review of embedded Linux development challenges. ● Define build system and criteria. ● Discuss a few popular options. ● Give me an opportunity to learn about some of the other tools. Goal: Help new embedded Linux developers get started About me Drew Moseley Mender.io ○ 10 years in Embedded Linux/Yocto development. ○ Over-the-air updater for Embedded Linux ○ Longer than that in general Embedded Software. ○ Open source (Apache License, v2) ○ Project Lead and Solutions Architect. ○ Dual A/B rootfs layout (client) [email protected] ○ Remote deployment management (server) https://twitter.com/drewmoseley https://www.linkedin.com/in/drewmoseley/ ○ Under active development https://twitter.com/mender_io Challenges for Embedded Linux Developers Hardware variety Storage Media Software may be maintained in forks Cross development Initial device provisioning Simple Makefiles don't cut it (anymore) Facts: ● These systems are huge ● Dependency Hell is a thing ● Builds take a long time ● Builds take a lot of resources ● Embedded applications require significant customization ● Developers need to modify from defaults Build System Defined _Is_ _Is Not_ ● Mechanism to specify and build ● An IDE ○ Define hardware/BSP ● A Distribution components ● A deployment and provisioning ○ Integrate user-space tool applications; including custom ● An out-of-the-box solution code ● Need reproducibility ● Must support multiple developers ● Allow for parallel
    [Show full text]
  • The Simple Firmware Interface
    The Simple Firmware Interface A. Leonard Brown Intel Open Source Technology Center [email protected] Abstract Moorestown cannot run in ACPI mode because its chipset does not include the required ACPI hardware, The Simple Firmware Interface (SFI) was developed as and it cannot run in legacy mode because the PC- a lightweight method for platform firmware to commu- compatible elements of the system simply do not exist. nicate with the Operating System. Intel’s upcoming “Moorestown” hand-held platform will be deployed using SFI. 3 SFI vs. ACPI Here we summarize the motivation for SFI, summarize the contents of the SFI specification, and detail choices System platforms are either “SFI-platforms” support- made in the Linux kernel implementation. ing SFI firmware tables, or “ACPI-platforms” support- ing ACPI tables. 1 Introduction An Operating System (OS) kernel that supports SFI is an “SFI-OS.” An OS that supports ACPI is an “ACPI- The SFI project home page is http:// OS.” simplefirmware.org. An SFI-platform requires an SFI-OS to boot and run op- This paper starts by briefly summarizing the site’s con- timally. An ACPI-platform requires an ACPI-OS to boot tent, including the content of the SFI specification. Then and run optimally.2 we describe the implementation of SFI on Linux. For more details, readers are encouraged to look over the A single OS binary can boot and run optimally on both specification, to read and participate on sfi-devel@ SFI-platforms and ACPI-platforms. It simply includes simplefirwmare.org, and to review and suggest the capabilities of the SFI-OS and ACPI-OS, making an enhancements to the source code.
    [Show full text]
  • Firmware for IA240 Series (Linux) Release Notes
    Firmware for IA240 Series (Linux) Release Notes Version: v1.10 Build: Build_19010911 Release Date: Jan 09, 2019 Applicable Products IA240 Series Supported Operating Systems Linux Kernel 2.6.x New Features N/A Enhancements • Includes cfi_cmdset_0001.c MTD device driver in the kernel to support both the Micron and MXIC NOR flash memories. Bugs Fixed • The gethostbyname_r() command returns an error. Changes N/A Notes N/A Firmware for IA240 Series (Linux) Release Notes Page 1 of 11 Version: v1.9 Build: Build 18033016 Release Date: Mar 30, 2018 Applicable Products IA240-LX, UC-7112-LX, IA240-T-LX, UC-7112-LX Plus Supported Operating Systems Linux 2.6.x New Features N/A Enhancements • Web server supports both HTTP and HTTPS services. • The SSH host key is generated at first system bootup. • Supports the MXIC NOR flash. Bugs Fixed • The iptables external module link path issue. • Busybox v1.13.3 issues: stty support for 921600, empty option issue (modprobe fixes empty option). • Login timeout leads to system reset. • Timezone configuration change is not applied. Changes N/A Notes N/A Firmware for IA240 Series (Linux) Release Notes Page 2 of 11 Version: v1.8 Build: Build 17060512 Release Date: Jul 07, 2017 Applicable Products IA240-T-LX, IA240-LX, UC-7112-LX, UC-7112-LX Plus Supported Operating Systems Linux 2.6.x New Features N/A Enhancements N/A Bugs Fixed • The vfork issue in the cron daemon. • Links to non-existent libraries /lib/libstdc++.so and /lib/libstdc++.so.5. • The sshd configuration is missing after firmware is upgraded from v1.4 to v1.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Document on Trusted Computing Platforms and in Particular on the Work Done by the Trusted Computing Group (TCG Group)
    ARTICLE 29 Data Protection Working Party 11816/03/EN WP 86 Working Document on Trusted Computing Platforms and in particular on the work done by the Trusted Computing Group (TCG group) Adopted on 23 January 2004 This Working Party was set up under Article 29 of Directive 95/46/EC. It is an independent European advisory body on data protection and privacy. Its tasks are described in Article 30 of Directive 95/46/EC and Article 14 of Directive 97/66/EC. The secretariat is provided by Directorate E (Services, Copyright, Industrial Property and Data Protection) of the European Commission, Internal Market Directorate-General, B-1049 Brussels, Belgium, Office No C100-6/136. Website: www.europa.eu.int/comm/privacy Working Document on Trusted Computing Platforms and in particular on the work done by the Trusted Computing Group (TCG group) THE WORKING PARTY ON THE PROTECTION OF INDIVIDUALS WITH REGARD TO THE PROCESSING OF PERSONAL DATA set up by Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 19951, having regard to Articles 29 and 30 paragraphs 1 (a) and 3 of that Directive, having regard to its Rules of Procedure and in particular to articles 12 and 14 thereof, has adopted the present Working Document: Background and future perspectives for trusted computing platforms The concept of trusted computing platforms originates from the computer industry’s observation that the current personal computer model is not conducive to guaranteeing security, as demonstrated by virus attacks, the possibility of spying on data being input, pirating of software and works of art, etc.
    [Show full text]