Finding Balance, Forging a Legacy: Harassers’ Rights and Employer Best Practices in the Era of Metoo
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Amazon's Antitrust Paradox
LINA M. KHAN Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox abstract. Amazon is the titan of twenty-first century commerce. In addition to being a re- tailer, it is now a marketing platform, a delivery and logistics network, a payment service, a credit lender, an auction house, a major book publisher, a producer of television and films, a fashion designer, a hardware manufacturer, and a leading host of cloud server space. Although Amazon has clocked staggering growth, it generates meager profits, choosing to price below-cost and ex- pand widely instead. Through this strategy, the company has positioned itself at the center of e- commerce and now serves as essential infrastructure for a host of other businesses that depend upon it. Elements of the firm’s structure and conduct pose anticompetitive concerns—yet it has escaped antitrust scrutiny. This Note argues that the current framework in antitrust—specifically its pegging competi- tion to “consumer welfare,” defined as short-term price effects—is unequipped to capture the ar- chitecture of market power in the modern economy. We cannot cognize the potential harms to competition posed by Amazon’s dominance if we measure competition primarily through price and output. Specifically, current doctrine underappreciates the risk of predatory pricing and how integration across distinct business lines may prove anticompetitive. These concerns are height- ened in the context of online platforms for two reasons. First, the economics of platform markets create incentives for a company to pursue growth over profits, a strategy that investors have re- warded. Under these conditions, predatory pricing becomes highly rational—even as existing doctrine treats it as irrational and therefore implausible. -
The Rules of #Metoo
University of Chicago Legal Forum Volume 2019 Article 3 2019 The Rules of #MeToo Jessica A. Clarke Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Clarke, Jessica A. (2019) "The Rules of #MeToo," University of Chicago Legal Forum: Vol. 2019 , Article 3. Available at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol2019/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Chicago Legal Forum by an authorized editor of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Rules of #MeToo Jessica A. Clarke† ABSTRACT Two revelations are central to the meaning of the #MeToo movement. First, sexual harassment and assault are ubiquitous. And second, traditional legal procedures have failed to redress these problems. In the absence of effective formal legal pro- cedures, a set of ad hoc processes have emerged for managing claims of sexual har- assment and assault against persons in high-level positions in business, media, and government. This Article sketches out the features of this informal process, in which journalists expose misconduct and employers, voters, audiences, consumers, or professional organizations are called upon to remove the accused from a position of power. Although this process exists largely in the shadow of the law, it has at- tracted criticisms in a legal register. President Trump tapped into a vein of popular backlash against the #MeToo movement in arguing that it is “a very scary time for young men in America” because “somebody could accuse you of something and you’re automatically guilty.” Yet this is not an apt characterization of #MeToo’s paradigm cases. -
A Former TMZ Employee Said She Was Fired After Complaining About a Sexist, Toxic Work Environment
A Former TMZ Employee Said She Was Fired After Complaining About A Sexist, Toxic Work Environment buzzfeednews.com/article/krystieyandoli/ex-tmz-employee-lawsuit A former TMZ employee filed a lawsuit against the celebrity gossip show’s parent companies Warner Bros. Entertainment and EHM Productions on Tuesday alleging gender discrimination and retaliation. Bernadette Zilio, 27, worked at TMZ and TooFab, another entertainment site owned by Warner Bros. and EHM Productions, from 2015 to 2020 and said she was fired after she complained to HR about a culture of toxicity and sexism. TMZ founder Harvey Levin, TooFab Managing Editor Shyam Dodge, and TooFab Senior Producer Ross McDonagh are also named in the lawsuit. In the complaint, which was filed Tuesday with the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing, Zilio said she went to Warner Bros. HR representatives in April 2019 about issues of “sexism, belittlement, preferential treatment and lies running rampant on [her] team.” She told HR that she felt there was a division of how men and women were treated on her team, and that when she spoke up about McDonagh writing articles she considered sexist and offensive, such as one that compared Rihanna getting sick with bronchitis and the “attack on her lungs” to her being attacked by Chris Brown, her concerns about making light of domestic violence were dismissed. The complaint also says that Zilio and her female colleagues described the work environment as “a boys’ club,” “100% a bro fest,” and a “freaking frat house.” “The first time I went to HR, they launched an investigation,” Zilio told BuzzFeed News. -
Faculty Senate Leadership Graduate School of Education Awards Law
UNIVERSITY of PENNSYLVANIA Tuesday, May 9, 2000 Volume 46 Number 32 www.upenn.edu/almanac/ Faculty Senate Leadership New Roles for Dean Lang The Faculty Senate President Judith Rodin announced last week leadership for 2000- that she had accepted with regret the decision of 2001, as of May 3: School of Nursing Phoebe Leboy is the Dean Norma Lang to newly elected past step down as dean, ef- chair; Larry Gross, fective this summer. center, continues as Dr. Lang, the Marga- chair; and David ret Bond Simon Dean Hackney is chair- of Nursing, is a world- elect. See SEC renowned nursing Actions on page 2. leader, educator and researcher. She has served as Dean since 1992 and will assume Phoebe Leboy Larry Gross David Hackney an endowed nursing professorship in the faculty. Norma Lang “The University is deeply grateful to Dean Graduate School of Education Awards Lang for the record of accomplishment the The Graduate School of Education has an- School has achieved under her leadership,” said nounced this year’s recipients of awards for fac- President Rodin. The School of Nursing is cur- ulty and students. Two awards were given to rently the top-funded private nursing school in faculty and three awards were given to students. federal research dollars from the NIH and con- Excellence in Teaching: Dr. Margaret Beale sistently ranked in the top two schools nation- Spencer, GSE Board of Overseers Professor of ally by the U.S. News & World Report survey of Education, director of CHANGES and director graduate schools. President Rodin continued, of DuBois Collective. -
2011 Kevin & Bean Clips Listed by Date
2011 Kevin & Bean clips listed by date January 03 Monday 01 Opening Segment-2011-01-03-No What It Do Nephew segment.mp3 02 Show Biz Beat-2011-01-03-6 am.mp3 03 Highlights Of Dick Clark and Ryan Seacrest-New Years Eve-2011-01-03.mp3 04 Harvey Levin-TMZ-2011-01-03.mp3 05 The Internet Round-up-2011-01-03.mp3 06 Show Biz Beat-2011-01-03-7 am.mp3 07 Thanks For That Info Bean-2011-01-03.mp3 08 Broken New Years Resolutions-2011-01-03.mp3 09 Show Biz Beat-2011-01-03-8 am.mp3 10 Eli Manning-2011-01-03-Turns 30 Today.mp3 11 Patton Oswalt-2011-01-03-New Book Out.mp3 12 Show Biz Beat-2011-01-03-9 am-Patton Oswalt Sits In.mp3 13 Dick Clark New Years Eve-More Highlights-2011-01-03-Patton Oswalt Sits In.mp3 14 Calling Arkansas About 2000 Dead Birds-2011-01-03-Patton Oswalt Sits In.mp3 15 Show Biz Beat-2011-01-03-10 am.mp3 January 04 Tuesday 01 Opening Segment-2011-01-04.mp3 02a Bean Did Not Realize It Was King Of Mexicos Birthday-2011-01-04.mp3 02b Show Biz Beat-2011-01-04-6 am.mp3 03 Calling Arkansas About 2000 Dead Birds-from Monday 2011-01-03-Patton Oswalt Sits In.mp3 04 and 14 Hotline To Heaven-2011-01-04-Michael Jackson.mp3 05 Oprah Rules In Kevins House-2011-01-04.mp3 06 Show Biz Beat-2011-01-04-7 am.mp3 07 Strange Addictions-2011-01-04-Listener Call-in.mp3 08 Paula Abdul-2011-01-04-On Her New TV Show.mp3 09 Show Biz Beat-2011-01-04-8 am.mp3 10 Bean Passed Out On Christmas Eve-2011-01-04-Wife Donna Explains.mp3 11 Psycho Body-2011-01-04.mp3 12 Show Biz Beat-2011-01-04-9 am.mp3 13 Afro Calls-2011-01-04.mp3 15 Show Biz Beat-2011-01-04-10 am.mp3 -
Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository #Wetoo
University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law 4-29-2021 #WeToo Kimberly Kessler Ferzan University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Criminal Procedure Commons, Domestic and Intimate Partner Violence Commons, Evidence Commons, Gender and Sexuality Commons, and the Law and Gender Commons Repository Citation Ferzan, Kimberly Kessler, "#WeToo" (2021). Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. 2332. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/2332 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law by an authorized administrator of Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Comments Welcome. Do not cite or quote without permission. #WeToo Kimberly Kessler Ferzan The #MeToo movement has caused a widespread cultural reckoning over sexual violence, abuse, and harassment. “Me too” was meant to express and symbolize that each individual victim was not alone in their experiences of sexual harm; they added their voice to others who had faced similar injustices. But viewing the #MeToo movement as a collection of singular voices fails to appreciate that the cases that filled our popular discourse were not cases of individual victims coming forward. Rather, case after case involved multiple victims, typically women, accusing single perpetrators. Victims were believed because there was both safety and strength in numbers. The allegations were not by a “me,” but far more frequently by a “we.” The #MeToo movement is the success of #WeToo. -
Nominate a Woman Who Connects the World
2019 BALLOT NOMINATE A WOMAN WHO CONNECTS THE WORLD Each year the Matrix Awards celebrates the career achievements of women in the communications field with a luncheon in their honor. This annual event, New York Women in presented by New York Women in Communications, Communications empowers pays tribute to the industry’s best and brightest women in all communications professional women in various fields of communications. disciplines at all stages of their careers to reach their full potential by promoting their ELIGIBILITY DETAILS professional growth and The Matrix Awards are presented annually to women who: inspiring them to achieve • have achieved the highest level of professional excellence in their fields; and share their successes in • are recognized for their exceptional abilities, their impact on the the rapidly changing world communications community, and their capacity to make a difference; of communications. • provide leadership to their constituency; A matrix was a metal • have contributed to New York Women in Communications’ goal of supporting the advancement of women in the communications field. mold used to cast type for printed material. It represents The final selection of winners is made by an awards committee comprising the beginning of mass representatives of the New York Women in Communications Board and past Matrix winners. The nominee must be available to attend the communication. Matrix Awards Luncheon in order to receive the award. 2019 MATRIX NOMINATIONS The category descriptions provided are merely a guide by which you may select your candidate. Awards will not be given in all categories listed. Nominations must be postmarked or emailed no later than midnight, Friday, September 7, 2018. -
Bro, Foe, Or Ally? Measuring Ambivalent Sexism in Political Online Reporters
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by City Research Online Bro, foe, or ally? Measuring ambivalent sexism in political online reporters Lindsey E. Blumell Department of Journalism, City, University of London, London, UK ABSTRACT The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI) measures hostile (overt antagonism towards women) and benevolent (chivalry) sexism. Previous research shows that political ideology contributes to ASI. Yet little attention has been given to increasingly popular political websites in terms of measuring sexism. Furthermore, recent firings of news professionals over accused sexual misconduct reveal the seriousness of sexism in the news industry. This study surveyed political online reporters (N = 210) using ASI and predicting sociodemographic and organizational factors. Results show benevolent sexism levels mostly similar for all factors, but not hostile sexism. Those working for conservative websites had higher levels of hostile sexism, but website partisanship had no significance for benevolent sexism. Men reported higher levels of hostile sexism and protective paternalism, but not complementary gender differentiation. Overall, individual levels of conservatism also predicted hostile sexism, but not benevolence. The pervasiveness of benevolence jeopardizes women’s progression in the workplace. High levels of hostility ultimately endanger newsrooms, as well as negatively impact political coverage of gender related issues. “Can I have some of the queen’s waters? Precious waters? Where’s that Bill Cosby pill I brought with me?” laughed veteran MSNBC host Chris Matthews, moments before interviewing the soon to be first female major party presidential candidate in US history (Noreen Malone 2018). His off-the-cuff remarks (1) belittled the authority of Hillary Clinton (calling her a queen) and (2) included a “joke” about giving her a Quaalude (Cosby has admitted to giving women Quaaludes in order to have sexual intercourse; Graham Bowley and Sydney Ember [2015]). -
Missives TMZ Executive Producer, Evan Rosenblum Interview with a Celebrity Interviewer
Malibu MISSIVES TMZ Executive Producer, Evan Rosenblum Interview with a Celebrity Interviewer TMZ, a relative newcomer, began in 2005 as the brainchild of Harvey Levin… you know, the “I’m a Lawyer” guy. TMZ made its way onto TV in 2007. For those who may have forgotten, “TMZ” is short for “The Thirty Mile Zone”; or Hol- lywood Producer short-speak for the 30-mile radius within which most Hollywood movie production occurs and the distance after which extra crew fees and travel expenses kick-in. While it’s described as a Celebrity Gossip, Entertain- ment and Celebrity News organization, I wouldn’t relegate TMZ to merely gossip news coverage. Almost immediately after launching, TMZ began earning its bones as journalists. TMZ is credited with breaking such global news as the Michael Jackson investigations and most tragically broke the news of Michael Jackson’s demise; as well as, the many times difficult-to-watch Donald Sterling-Clippers debacle. TMZ created its own sometimes tongue- in-cheek, good-humored, unique Entertainment News coverage style and format; at which many would agree they remain the best. Recently, I was able to speak with Evan Rosenblum, an Executive Producer at TMZ and TMZ Hollywood Sports where he also performs double-duty as its lead host. Evan has been with Harvey Levin from the beginning. He started as an intern while still pursuing his undergraduate degree in Journalism from Arizona State University. In a very short period, Evan has come a long way. During our conversation, I learned that Evan is credited with breaking some of TMZ’s biggest stories. -
Delivering on the #Metoo Mandate: Reforming Antidiscrimination Law to Deter and Remedy Sexual Harassment
American Constitution Society 2019 National Convention June 6-8, 2019 Washington, DC Delivering on the #MeToo Mandate: Reforming Antidiscrimination Law to Deter and Remedy Sexual Harassment by Debra S. Katz* Lisa J. Banks Hannah Alejandro Katz, Marshall & Banks LLP Washington, DC 202-299-1140 www.kmblegal.com * Debra S. Katz and Lisa J. Banks are founding partners with Katz, Marshall & Banks, LLP, a civil rights firm based in Washington, D.C., that specializes in the representation of plaintiffs in employment law, whistleblower, civil rights and civil liberties matters. Hannah Alejandro is Senior Counsel with the Firm. I. Introduction When the #MeToo movement emerged in October 2017 in the wake of the Harvey Weinstein scandal, its revelations prompted a nationwide reckoning with the epidemic of sexual harassment, sexual assault, and abuse – largely of women – in the workplace that could no longer be denied.1 The Civil Rights Act of 1964 has prohibited many forms of sexual harassment for over 50 years, providing crucial protections for millions of American workers. As #MeToo makes clear, however, abusive, hostile work environments are still very much part of the 21st century workplace. The movement has brought long overdue attention to both the importance and power of the law to protect workers, and some its dramatic failures to prevent and remedy widespread harassment thus far. At its core, sexual harassment rests on entrenched imbalances and abuses of power, and truly meaningful, lasting change will only come when the overall power structures of the American workplace have shifted. Practically speaking, such systemic change cannot come from individual legal action alone, or even primarily; its costs are simply too high and its reach too limited, particularly for low-wage workers. -
Duke University School Of
Bulletin of Duke University School of Law 2020-2021 Duke University Registrar Frank Blalark, Associate Vice Provost and University Registrar Editor Frances Curran Coordinating Editor Bahar Rostami Publications Coordinators Keely Fagan Alaina Kaupa Photographs Courtesy of Duke School of Law Department of Communications and Duke University (Les Todd, Bill Snead, Megan Morr, Chris Hildreth, and Jared Lazarus) The information in this bulletin applies to the academic year 2020-2021 and is accurate and current, to the greatest extent possible, as of September 2020. The university reserves the right to change programs of study, academic requirements, teaching staff, the calendar, and other matters described herein without prior notice, in accordance with established procedures. Duke University is committed to encouraging and sustaining a learning and work community that is free from prohibited discrimination and harassment. The institution prohibits discrimination on the basis of age, color, disability, gender, gender identity, gender expression, genetic information, national origin, race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, or veteran status, in the administration of its educational policies, admission policies, financial aid, employment, or any other institution program or activity. It admits qualified students to all the rights, privileges, programs, and activities generally accorded or made available to students. Sexual harassment and sexual misconduct are forms of sex discrimination and prohibited by the institution. Duke has designated the Vice President for Institutional Equity and Chief Diversity Officer as the individual responsible for the coordination and administration of its nondiscrimination and harassment policies. The Office for Institutional Equity is located in Smith Warehouse, 114 S. Buchanan Blvd., Bay 8, Durham, NC 27708, and can be contacted at (919) 684-8222. -
The Fragility of the Free American Press
Copyright 2017 by RonNell Andersen Jones and Sonja R. West Vol. 112 Northwestern University Law Review THE FRAGILITY OF THE FREE AMERICAN PRESS RonNell Andersen Jones & Sonja R. West ABSTRACT—President Donald Trump has faced criticism for attacking the press and for abandoning longstanding traditions of accommodating and respecting it. This Essay argues that the national discussion spurred by Trump’s treatment of the press has fallen short of capturing the true seriousness of the situation. Trump’s assault on the custom of press accommodation follows a generation-long collapse of other major press protections. In order to fully understand the critical juncture at which American press freedom now stands, we must expand the discussion beyond talk of a rogue president’s aberrant attacks on the press and consider the increasingly fragile edifice on which the American free press sits. This is because the kind of press we value and need in the United States—one that is free, independent, and democracy-enhancing—does not just occur naturally. Nor is it protected by a single, robust constitutional right. Rather, it is supported by a number of legal and nonlegal pillars, such as the institutional media’s relative financial strength, the goodwill of the public, a mutually dependent relationship with government officials, and the backing of sympathetic judges. Each of these supports has weakened substantially in recent years, leaving the one remaining pillar of tradition and custom to bear more of the weight. Contrary to widespread belief, our concern should not be that Trump might be taking the first step toward crippling the power of the free press, but rather that he might be taking the final step in a process that has long been underway.