DOCSLIB.ORG

TTC Investigation Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TTC Investigation Report Report October 2012 Tunnel Vision: An Investigation into the Toronto Transit Commission Second Exit Project at Donlands and Greenwood Stations Fiona Crean Ombudsman TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 4 2.0 The Complaint ........................................................................................................ 7 3.0 The Investigation .................................................................................................... 7 4.0 The Facts 8 4.1 History of the Second Exit Project .................................................................. 8 4.1.1 TTC Reports ................................................................................................... 8 4.1.2 TTC's Preferred Options ................................................................................. 9 4.1.3 TTC Policy – Property Acquisition & Notification Protocol .............................. 9 4.2 Notice to Councillor and Community ............................................................. 10 4.2.1 Community Response to Notice ................................................................... 14 4.2.2 TTC's Response to Notice ............................................................................ 16 4.2.3 Community's Request for Information ........................................................... 17 4.2.4 TTC Meeting with the Owner of Property Y .................................................. 18 4.3 Community Information Meeting - June 29, 2010 ......................................... 19 4.4 Properties A and B ........................................................................................ 21 4.5 Request for Information ................................................................................ 24 4.5.1 The Property D Proposal .............................................................................. 24 4.5.2 Information from TTC .................................................................................... 24 4.5.3 A Concerned Resident .................................................................................. 26 4.5.4 Public Consultation Meeting - July 12, 2010 ................................................. 27 4.5.5 Owner of Property D Notified - July 13, 2010 ................................................ 31 4.6 Commission Meeting - July 14, 2010 ............................................................ 33 4.7 Construction Liaison Committee Meetings .................................................... 37 4.8 Commission Meeting - August 23, 2010 ....................................................... 38 4.9 The Owners of Properties X and Y ............................................................... 38 4.10 Public Consultation Meeting - September 16, 2010 ...................................... 39 4.11 Safety Issues and Compromise of Rules ...................................................... 41 4.11.1 Consistent Rules and Information ................................................................. 42 4.11.2 Exit Evacuation Time Rule - 2-Minute Rule .................................................. 42 4.12 Letters to Residents ...................................................................................... 45 2 4.13 Architecture and Urban Design Firm ............................................................. 45 4.14 Donlands Church Option ............................................................................... 48 4.15 Request for Information ................................................................................ 48 4.16 Construction Liaison Committee Meeting - January 20, 2011 ....................... 49 4.17 The Firm's Report Revisited.......................................................................... 50 4.18 Requested Clarification of Criteria ................................................................ 52 4.19 City Council Budget Meeting & Cancelled Public Meeting ............................ 53 4.20 Public Consultation ....................................................................................... 54 5.0 Engineer's Expert Report ...................................................................................... 55 6.0 Status of Donlands Station.................................................................................... 57 7.0 Status of Greenwood Station ................................................................................ 57 8.0 Woodbine and Coxwell Station – A Comparison ................................................... 58 9.0 Ombudsman Findings ........................................................................................... 59 10.0 Ombudsman Conclusions .................................................................................... 66 11.0 Ombudsman Recommendations .......................................................................... 67 12.0 City and TTC Responses ..................................................................................... 68 Appendix A – History of the Second Exit Project ....................................................... 71 Appendix B – TTC July 12, 2010 Matrices ................................................................. 76 Appendix C – TTC September 16, 2010 Matrices ...................................................... 78 Appendix D – History of the TTC Design Principles and Criteria ................................ 79 Appendix E – Comparison of Evacuation Times of TTC Options ............................... 82 Appendix F – Firm's Matrix, December 2, 2010 ......................................................... 83 Appendix G – Firm's Revised Matrix, December 16, 2010 ......................................... 84 Appendix H – TTC Matrices, January 20, 2011 .......................................................... 85 Appendix I – City Response ..................................................................................... 88 Appendix J – TTC Response ..................................................................................... 90 3 1.0 Executive Summary 1. In June 2010, the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) informed area residents near Donlands and Greenwood stations of its intention to construct two second exits on Strathmore Blvd (Strathmore). The TTC indicated in an unaddressed flyer, delivered to most properties, that four residential houses on the street, two from each neighbourhood, would be torn down to build a second TTC exit (Project). The flyer also notified residents of a public meeting, scheduled less than two weeks later, to discuss the design and construction implications of the Project. 2. The Ombudsman received complaints from a group of residents questioning the TTC's policies and procedures relating to notice of the Project, lack of public consultation and differential treatment between the two communities affected. 3. The Ombudsman initiated an investigation to inquire into these complaints, issuing a notice of investigation on December 21, 2011. 4. The investigation revealed that although the TTC began evaluating options for the second exit location in early 2004, residents impacted by the Project were only notified in mid 2010 - a few months before the TTC planned to begin construction. As a result, neither Donlands nor Greenwood communities were afforded the opportunity to adequately review the TTC's plans and participate in a public consultation process. The Ombudsman concluded that the TTC failed to meaningfully engage in a public consultation. 5. In addition to providing minimal notice, the TTC's communication with affected residents was very poor. The investigation found that the TTC failed to notify two of the four property owners, whose homes it planned to acquire, in advance of delivering the general flyer to the community. It did not initiate face-to-face contact with any of the four property owners prior to the first public meeting. Subsequently, the TTC failed to notify a fifth property owner that it planned to acquire his home in advance of the second public meeting at which it revealed these plans. 6. The TTC was reluctant to provide information about the Project with residents. It shared its newly selected exit location for Greenwood station at the second public meeting without first consulting the affected property owner. The Ombudsman found it particularly egregious that the TTC only contacted the property owner on the day of the Commission meeting where it would be requesting the Commission's approval for the acquisition of the property. The property owner received an hour's notice to prepare a deputation before the TTC Commission. 4 7. Two days after the second public meeting, the TTC Commission meeting was held in which the TTC requested that the Project for both stations be approved for construction. Residents deputed at the meeting and asked that the matter be deferred. The Commission did not defer the Project, but ordered the TTC, in moving forward, to engage in a public consultation process with the two communities. 8. The Ombudsman noted that the TTC treated the two communities differently. This was evident when the TTC agreed to return to the Commission with recommendations for Greenwood, but not for Donlands. It also provided a package of information to one community and not the other. In making its decisions, it appeared as though the TTC used its discretion at Greenwood, but not at Donlands. 9. Although public meetings took place with TTC staff and experts were retained
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Noise and Vibration Projects
    Frontop Engineering Limited 101 Amber Street, Unit 1, Markham Ontario, Canada, L3R 3B2 Telephone: (905) 947-0900; Fax: (905) 305-9370 Website: www.frontop.ca; Email: [email protected] List of Our Ongoing Noise and Vibration Monitoring Projects Project 1: Name of Project: Geotechnical Instrumentation and Monitoring Plan- Segment 1- Keelesdale Station Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada Client: Metrolinx-Eglinton Crosstown Light Rapid Transit (ECLRT) Project Main project features: Geotechnical Instrumentation and Monitoring, Noise and Vibration Monitoring Activities performed: install and monitoring following instrument Prepared and installed six (6) real-time vibration stations and five (5) real-time noise monitoring station. And weekly attendant two (2) noise and two (2) vibration stations monitoring. Project 2: Name of Project: Geotechnical Instrumentation and Monitoring Plan- Segment 1- Mt Dennis Station Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada Client: Metrolinx-Eglinton Crosstown Light Rapid Transit (ECLRT) Project Main project features: Geotechnical Instrumentation and Monitoring, Noise and Vibration Monitoring Activities performed: install and monitoring following instrument Prepared and installed four (4) real-time vibration stations and four (4) real-time noise monitoring station. And weekly attendant two (2) noise and two (2) vibration stations monitoring Project 3: Name of Project: TTC Wilson Yard Track and Structure Building Renovation (Contract AW1-3) Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada Client: TTC Main project features: Track and Structure Building Renovation Activities performed: Prepared and installed the one (1) real-time noise monitoring station and one (1) real- time vibration monitoring station. Project 4: Name of Project: TTC Hillcrest Complex Surface Way Facility Replacement, and Harvey Shop Loading Deck (Contract M7-2 & M1-91) Client: TTC Main project features: Surface Way Facility Replacement Activities performed: Prepared and installed the two (2) real-time noise monitoring station and two (2) real- time vibration monitoring station.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Canada Railway Society the Cover
    Upper Canada Railway Society The Cover Rapid transit comes to tbe suburbs I A westbound TTC Bloor-Danforth train is sbown bere on tbe newly-opened eastern extension of tbe subway, between Warden and Victoria Park Stations. It is skirting Bell's Busb Park and tbe Massey Creek Ravine — scenery wbicb no doubt newsletter comes as a pleasant surprise to many commuters formerly used to traffic jams on their way to work. See page 55. Number 268 May, 1968 — Ted Wickson Published monthly by the Upper Canada Railway Society, Inc., Box 122, Terminal A, Toronto, Ont. Coming Events James A. Brown, Editor ^xo:OT•^x•:•x•>x•:•>^>^^^^:•:•^^^^:^^ Regular meetings of the Society are held on the third Friday of each month (except July and August) at 589 Mt. Pleasant Road, Authorized as Second Class Matter by the Post Office Department, Toronto, Ontario. 8.00 p.m. Ottawa, Ont. and for payment of postage In cash. Members are asked to give the Society at least five weeks notice June 1: Steam excursion to Stratford, leaves Toronto of address changes. (Sat) at 0815 EDT. FARES: Adult S9.75; Child S5.00; Infant $1.00. June 9: A visit to tbe OERHA property at Rockwood is (Sun) being arranged. Write tbe Entertainment Com• Please address NEWSLETTER contributions to the Editor at mittee for details. 3 Bromley Crescent, Bramalea, Ontario. No responsibility is June 13: NOTE CHANGE OF DATE! assumed for loss or nonreturn of material. (Tburs) Outdoor meeting: A visit to CN's new Express Terminal at Toronto Yard, Keele Street at Hwy All other Society business, including membership Inquiries, should 7.
    [Show full text]
  • General Manager Subway Construction Date
    TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. S7 Meeting Date June 4, 1968 From: General Manager Subway Construction Date: June 3, 1968 QUEEN STREET SUBWAY FOR STREETCAR OPERATION The Commission, at its meeting of February 8, 1966, approved advising the City of Toronto that it was prepared to co-operate in the study of a "transit facility in the downtown section of Queen Street" and approved advising the Metropolitan Council that the Commission proposes to undertake this study at a cost of $30,000.00, it being understood that the cost involved would form part of the capital cost of the project when approved. The General Secretary transmitted the above approval of the Commission to the City Clerk in a letter dated February 22, 1966, a copy of which is attached. In a letter dated November 2, 1966, a copy of which is attached, the Commission was advised by the Metropolitan Clerk that Metropolitan Council had adopted Clause No. 2 of Report No. 16 of the Transportation Committee, headed "Proposed Queen Street Subway", as amended. The recommendation of Clause No. 2 reads as follows, "It is recommended that the Metropolitan Council formally request the Toronto Transit Commission to complete their study of the physical aspects of the Queen Street tunnel as outlined in the Commission's letter of February 22, 1966, on the understanding that the required expenditure of $30,000.00 will form part of the capital cost of the project." The amendment to Clause No. 2 reads as follows, "The matter of the Queen Street tunnel being considered in relation to the question of the Queen-Greenwood Subway." In accordance with all the foregoing, plans were developed for a "transit facility in the downtown section on Queen Street", and in addition to this a preliminary examination was made of the downtown section in relation to it becoming part of the Queen-Greenwood Subway.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Donlands Station Accessible and Second Exit/Entrance
    2045.8 For Action Making Donlands Station Accessible and Second Exit/Entrance Date: July 14, 2020 To: TTC Board From: Chief Capital Officer Summary The purpose of this report is to obtain authorization for the award of Contract D6-3, Donlands Station Second Exit/Entrance and Easier Access to Maystar General Contractors Inc. in the amount of $45,663,300.00, inclusive of all taxes, on the basis of lowest priced acceptable bid. The work for Contract D6-3 Donlands Station - Second Exit/Entrance and Easier Access includes construction of stairs from each of the eastbound and westbound platforms and an underground corridor leading to a second exit and entrance building, construction and installation of elevators, and all other associated works. The construction phase of the Contract is scheduled to commence in Q3 2020 and is expected to be completed by Q4 2023. Elevators are scheduled to be put in service by Q4 2022. Recommendations It is recommended that the Board authorize: 1. Award of Contract D6-3, Donlands Station - Second Exit/Entrance and Easier Access to Maystar General Contractors Inc. in the amount of $45,663,300.00, inclusive of all taxes, on the basis of lowest priced acceptable bid. Financial Summary Sufficient funds for this expenditure are included in the TTC's 2020-2029 approved Capital Budget and Plan under Program 3.9 Building and Structures – Fire Ventilation Upgrade project, State of Good Repair/Safety category and Easier Access III project, Legislative category. The Fire Ventilation Upgrade total project cost is approximately $504 million, of which approximately $303 million has been committed to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Transit in Toronto Levyrapidtransit.Ca TABLE of CONTENTS
    The Neptis Foundation has collaborated with Edward J. Levy to publish this history of rapid transit proposals for the City of Toronto. Given Neptis’s focus on regional issues, we have supported Levy’s work because it demon- strates clearly that regional rapid transit cannot function eff ectively without a well-designed network at the core of the region. Toronto does not yet have such a network, as you will discover through the maps and historical photographs in this interactive web-book. We hope the material will contribute to ongoing debates on the need to create such a network. This web-book would not been produced without the vital eff orts of Philippa Campsie and Brent Gilliard, who have worked with Mr. Levy over two years to organize, edit, and present the volumes of text and illustrations. 1 Rapid Transit in Toronto levyrapidtransit.ca TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 INTRODUCTION 7 About this Book 9 Edward J. Levy 11 A Note from the Neptis Foundation 13 Author’s Note 16 Author’s Guiding Principle: The Need for a Network 18 Executive Summary 24 PART ONE: EARLY PLANNING FOR RAPID TRANSIT 1909 – 1945 CHAPTER 1: THE BEGINNING OF RAPID TRANSIT PLANNING IN TORONTO 25 1.0 Summary 26 1.1 The Story Begins 29 1.2 The First Subway Proposal 32 1.3 The Jacobs & Davies Report: Prescient but Premature 34 1.4 Putting the Proposal in Context CHAPTER 2: “The Rapid Transit System of the Future” and a Look Ahead, 1911 – 1913 36 2.0 Summary 37 2.1 The Evolving Vision, 1911 40 2.2 The Arnold Report: The Subway Alternative, 1912 44 2.3 Crossing the Valley CHAPTER 3: R.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Rotary Awareness Campaign Launched in Toronto
    ROTARY AWARENESS CAMPAIGN LAUNCHED IN TORONTO Part of making sure that all visiting Rotarians will feel welcome in Toronto for this June’s Convention is to build awareness of Rotary within the Greater Toronto Area. Seven Rotary Clubs within Districts 7010 and 7070 have commissioned ten murals by young artists within their communities to help tell the story of Rotary and all the good it does in the world. These original works of art have now been put on display in ten Toronto Subway stations and will remain in place through the convention period. Each mural has on it the name of the sponsoring Rotary Club(s), the name of the Participating Partner and the Vibe Arts logo. Kennedy Station Kennedy Station Wilson Station Full size copies of the murals are also going to be on prominent display in the Host Organizing Committee Lounge at the House of Friendship. Wilson Station St. Andrews Station St. Andrews Station Following the display period the original murals are going to be given to the sponsoring clubs for their use. This initiative was produced in conjunction with VIBE Arts whose mandate is to instill self- esteem in youth through the arts. Islington Station Islington Station Christie Station Christie Station Congratulations to the following Rotary Clubs for their generous support for Youth and the Arts. Rotary Club of Scarborough Rotary Club of Toronto Eglington Rotary Club of Elliot Lake Rotary Club of Toronto Forest Hill Rotary Club of Etobicoke Rotary Club of Toronto West Rotary Club of Toronto .
    [Show full text]
  • FINCH WEST SERVICE: DAILY SCHEDULE NO: PAGE: 1 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION DIVISION: ARRW REPLACES NO: EFFECTIVE: Mar 29, 2021
    ROUTE: 36 - FINCH WEST SERVICE: DAILY SCHEDULE NO: PAGE: 1 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION DIVISION: ARRW REPLACES NO: EFFECTIVE: Mar 29, 2021 SERVICE PLANNING-RUN GUIDE SAFE OPERATION TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER TIMES SHOWN ON THIS SCHEDULE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DOWN FROM: -- HUMBERWOOD LOOP CL HUMBER COLLEGE BLV.& FINCH AVE.W AL ALBION RD. & FINCH AVE. W. AD ARDWICK BLVD. & FINCH AVE. W. MI MILVAN DR & PENN DR FA FINCH AVE. W. & ARROW RD. YO YORK GATE BLVD. - NORTH OF FINCH FJ FINCH AVE. W. & JANE ST. FW FINCH WEST STATION KE KEELE ST. & FINCH AVE. W. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- UP FROM: -- FINCH STATION KE KEELE ST. & FINCH AVE. W. FW FINCH WEST STATION FJ FINCH AVE. W. & JANE ST. OD OAKDALE RD. & FINCH AVE. W. FA FINCH AVE. W. & ARROW RD. BA ST.BASIL THE GREAT COLL SCHOOL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RUN | |AR |FA& | 3| 1| 3| 4| | | | | | | | | | | | | |TOTAL |DOWN | 428a| 433a| 638a| 826a|1029a|1254p| 315p| | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 | UP | | 525a| 736a| 925a|1140a| 205p| 401p| 406p| | | | | | | | | | | |11:38 | | | 8|FW 1|FW 2|FW 5|FW 5|FA |AR | | | | | | | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RUN | | | |WB? | 5| 1| 7| 4| 4| 5| 7| | | | | | |
    [Show full text]
  • Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register -1627 Danforth Avenue
    ~TORONTO REPORT FOR ACTION Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register - 1627 Danforth Avenue Date: April 4, 2019 To: Toronto Preservation Board Toronto and East York Community Council From: Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning Wards: Ward 19 – Beaches-East York SUMMARY This report recommends that City Council include the property at 1627 Danforth Avenue on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register. The site contains a complex known historically as the Danforth Carhouse, which is currently owned by the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC). It was developed beginning in 1914 by the Toronto Civic Railways (TCR), expanded by the Toronto Transportation Commission (forerunner to today's TTC) and the TTC and currently used as offices and staff facilities for TTC personnel. In 2015, City Council requested that the property at 1627 Danforth Avenue be researched and evaluated for inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register. It has been identified for its potential cultural heritage value in the Danforth Avenue Planning Study (2018). It is the selected site for a police station consolidating 54 and 55 Divisions. The property at 1627 Danforth Avenue is part of a Master Plan study being undertaken by CreateTO to guide the redevelopment of the site as a multi-use civic hub for the Toronto Transit Commission, the Toronto Police Service and the Toronto Public Library as the key anchor tenants, which will incorporate and adaptively reuse the Danforth Carhouse. RECOMMENDATIONS The Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design City Planning recommends that: 1. City Council include the property at 1627 Danforth Avenue on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register in accordance with the Statement of Significance (Reasons for Inclusion), attached as Attachment 3 to the report (April 4, 2019) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Renewal of West Construction Field Office Lease 1 East
    Insert TTC logo here STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Renewal of West Construction Field Office Lease – 1 East Mall Crescent Date: April 27, 2016 To: TTC Board From: Chief Executive Officer Summary The purpose of this report is to seek the Board’s approval, in respect of the lease of the premises located at 1 East Mall Crescent, Suite 200 (the West Construction Field Office), to extend the term of the lease for an additional five years, subject to the terms and conditions outlined in this report. Recommendations It is recommended that the Board: 1. Authorize the execution of the lease amendment agreement to extend the lease between Madekat Holdings Corporation and the Toronto Transit Commission for the lease of the premises located at 1 East Mall Crescent, Suite 200, Toronto, for a term of five years, and amend the lease to provide for an additional option to extend for five years in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in the agreement and as summarized in this report, in accordance with the Toronto Transit Commission’s policies, and any other documents or agreements arising as a result of entry into the lease, acceptable to the TTC’s Head - Legal and General Counsel. 2. Approve the expenditure of $396,980 plus HST for rent payments for the premises (including utilities) for a five year term, subject to change from current projections due to the escalation of additional rent, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the lease. Implementation Points The recommendations are for TTC staff to proceed with negotiations of the extension and amendment of the lease in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Improvements for 2002
    SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS FOR 2002 Subway Streetcars Buses RT October 2001 Service Improvements for 2002 - 2 - Table of contents Table of contents Summary................................................................................................................................................................4 Recommendations ..............................................................................................................................................5 1. Planning transit service ...............................................................................................................................6 2. Recommended new and revised services for the Sheppard Subway .......................................10 Sheppard Subway.................................................................................................................................................................................10 11 BAYVIEW – Service to Bayview Station...........................................................................................................................................10 25 DON MILLS – Service to Don Mills Station ....................................................................................................................................11 Don Mills/Scarborough Centre – New limited-stop rocket route ....................................................................................................11 Finch East – Service to Don Mills Station...........................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • City of Toronto Customized Global Template
    STAFF REPORT October 7, 2002 To: Policy and Finance Committee From: Chief Administrative Officer Subject: Candidate Projects: Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund and Border Infrastructure Fund and the Status Report on Infrastructure Funding Programs Purpose: This report recommends priority projects for submission by the City of Toronto to the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund and Border Infrastructure Fund. A status report on City of Toronto’s participation in Provincial and Federal infrastructure funds is appended to this report for information. Financial Implications and Impact Statement: There are no financial implications to the City of Toronto arising from the recommendations of this report. Access to Federal infrastructure funding would relieve some of the City’s fiscal pressures. It would also enable the City to make progress on the maintenance and enhancement of its infrastructure. Recommendations: It is recommended that: (1) Council submit a request to the Federal government through the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund for funding to maintain and modernize the infrastructure assets of the Toronto Transit Commission as follows: - Streetcar and Track Renewal and Replacement – $622 million over 10 years; - SRT Expansion and Modernisation – $133 million over the next 10 years; - Subway Fire Ventilation Upgrades – $250 million over 20 years; and - Easier Access Program – $270 million over 18 years; (2) Council submit a request to the Federal government through the Border Infrastructure Fund for funding to the Toronto-Rochester
    [Show full text]
  • Approval of Art Concepts for Coxwell, Wellesley, Royal York, Ossington and St
    STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Approval of Art Concepts for Coxwell, Wellesley, Royal York, Ossington and St. Clair West Stations Date: December 16, 2015 To: TTC Board From: Chief Executive Officer Summary In accordance with the TTC’s “Art in Public Transit Facilities” policy, public art is being provided at five stations as part of the Easier Access Phase III and Second Exit projects and is being administered in groups in co-ordination with the project construction schedules. Five stations are included in this initial group: Coxwell, Wellesley, Royal York, Ossington and St. Clair West. An open call for artist prequalification was held and a jury selected three artists per station to provide art concepts. Artists and art concepts for the five stations were selected by juries consisting of artists, art educators and art administrators including a local representative, and the TTC’s chief architect and were facilitated by the TTC’s art consultant. The concepts have been shown to the community as part of a series of public open houses. Recommendations It is recommended that the Board approve the public art concepts for these projects, noting that the TTC’s “Policy for Art in Public Transit Facilities” has been followed: Coxwell Station Easier Access: “Forwards and Backwards” by Jennifer Davis and Jon Sasaki; Wellesley Station Second Exit and Easier Access: Low-relief sculptural mosaic by Gisele Amantea; Royal York Station Easier Access: “rabbit STOP” by Noel Harding; Ossington Station Easier Access: “The Particles” by Scott Eunson and Staff report for action on Approval of Art Concept - EAIII 1 St. Clair West Station: “The Commuters” by Rhonda Weppler and Trevor Mahovsky.
    [Show full text]