ANNUAL REPORT GREEN EUROPEAN FOUNDATION (GEF) Asbl CONTENTS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ANNUAL REPORT GREEN EUROPEAN FOUNDATION (GEF) Asbl CONTENTS ANNUAL REPORT GREEN EUROPEAN FOUNDATION (GEF) asbl CONTENTS 3 INTRODUCTION 4 - 7 CORE AREAS OF WORK Study and debate Education and training Networking Green Europe 7 PEOPLE OF GEF 2012 8 - 9 GEF WORK ACROSS EUROPE IN 5 YEARS 10 - 14 GEF PROJECT DETAILS Study and debate Education and training Networking Green Europe 14 - 15 STRUCTURES AND FINANCES OF GEF ABOUT THIS PUBLICATION Project coordination: Andrew Murphy Production: www.thepixelpod.com This publication has been realised with the financial support of the European Parliament. The European Parliament is not responsible for the content of this project. This publication can be ordered at: The Green European Foundation – Brussels Office: 15 Rue d’Arlon – B-1050 Brussels – Belgium Tel: +32 2 234 65 70 I Fax: +32 2 234 65 79 E-mail: [email protected] I Web: www.gef.eu Green European Foundation asbl 1 Rue du Fort Elisabeth – 1463 Luxembourg 3 INTRODUCTION 2012 may well be looked back on as the year when of GEF’s Green European Journal, which is fast a European political demos began to emerge. becoming an essential part of online debate for Elections in France, Greece and the Netherlands the Green movement. took on a ‘European’ dimension, with the results This past year also saw a record number of GEF impacting the direction of EU policy. Local and events. In total, GEF organised 47 events in 17 regional elections in Catalonia and Belgium were countries, on topics as diverse as LGBT rights, seen as signs of growing regionalist sentiment the Green New Deal and the rise of the populist- across the continent, posing a challenge to the right. GEF also extended its range of publications cohesion of Member States. and expanded its social media presence. Developments at national and regional level The European Parliament elections in June 2014 were complemented by on-going developments are now within sight. They will offer an opportunity at European level. The European Parliament for European citizens to cast their judgment on flexed its post-Lisbon Treaty muscles by rejecting the decisions made by their leaders, and perhaps the unpopular ACTA treaty, and prepared to opt for a more positive vision for Europe. GEF will play a role for the first time as co-legislator on continue to work across Europe over the next 18 agricultural policy, fisheries policy and the EU months to ensure Europe’s citizens have the budget. Meanwhile the coming into force of the ability, ideas and motivation to truly engage with European Citizens’ Initiative offered a chance for the European project at a time of such crucial European Citizens to work across borders on importance to its future. issues as diverse as road safety, water quality and animal rights. Of course, the on-going backdrop to this was the Eurozone crisis. European leaders were willing to act only when the very future of the Euro, and the EU itself, appeared at risk. Though the crisis receded towards the end of the year, no one finished 2012 with greater confidence in the leadership provided by EU governments. For GEF, the challenge was to remain relevant in the midst of this rapidly changing environment. Heidi Hautala, Pierre Jonckheer, This meant keeping a focus on the long term, GEF Co-President GEF Co-President but also tailoring our work to fit developments as they occurred. An example of this was our ‘Future of Europe’ project, with our series of discussions becoming forums to debate the latest developments at EU level. 2012 was the first year since GEF’s establishment when its funding from the European Parliament did not substantially increase. This offered a chance for GEF to consolidate, but it did not see GEF tame its ambitions. 2012 saw the launch CORE AREAS OF WORK Meeting of the network of correspondents for the Green European Journal December 2012 Study and debate read about in the presentation of GEF’s 2012 projects. A crucial feature of both of these projects Five years after GEF was established, promoting was that GEF worked closely with our national critical debate and reflection on Europe remains member foundations across Europe. Debate on at the core of the foundation’s activities. The the future of Europe, or indeed any issue of need to create a European level public space, European concern, has often been accused of where European citizens can exchange ideas taking place within a ‘Brussels Bubble’, and so and experiences, was exposed as ever more by working with partner organisation rooted crucial in 2012. The primary example of this was within national contexts, we ensured our work the on-going Eurozone crisis, which reached connected with the debates as they existed in its peak over the summer months. Terms such Member States. as solidarity, federalism and fiscal union meant different things to different Europeans, with The debate over the future of Europe was, of national contexts and differing histories providing course, not the only issue to be the subject for a range of interpretation and meaning. study and debate in 2012. GEF continued its focus on a range of topics such as the rise of the For GEF, its ambition to contribute to dialogue populist-right, the Green New Deal and expanded at European level was heavily influenced by this its work into new areas such as the concept of highly crucial debate about the future of Europe. the commons and LGBTQ rights. All of these Using a range of mediums, including websites, topics and more, many of which were addressed events and publications, GEF sought to increase through the Green European Journal, were fertile the exchange of ideas between national contexts grounds for debate. and to help the European Green movement develop its response to this existential threat to In 2013, we look forward to continuing to work with the Union. our national and European partner organisations to expand the number of topics that we cover in Key among these efforts was the ‘Future of our work, and hope that the projects detailed Europe’ seminar series and the launch of the further on in this report inspire you to become Green European Journal, more of which you can closely engaged with GEF’s work. GREEN EUROPEAN FOUNDATION / ANNUAL REPORT 2012 5 point of view of Ireland, which had gone from GEF’s 2012 FOR ME... boom to bust in the financial crisis, but also Nuala Ahern, Chair of the from that of Great Britain, the most eurosceptic Green Foundation Ireland state in the EU. Speakers from Ireland, the UK and Germany were able to bring together these “Future of Europe” differing perspectives, adding real value to the seminar; Dublin, discussion. November 2012 The seminar agreed that the public space in Europe is fractured and divisive as a result of the The seminar was a great event in addressing the crisis and that it is crucial that this changes. No crisis from a Green perspective. But because progress on the democratic level can happen the conclusions were so clear and compelling it without a public space. The Green European is important for the European-wide debate also. Journal and GEF exist to create a Green public It also addressed the issue not only from the space in Europe – much needed! Education and Training The primary purpose for providing education and training opportunities is to give European citizens the necessary tools to engage with the European process. As the European Union becomes increasingly relevant to its citizens’ daily life, and as the European Parliament becomes an ever more influential body, such skills are needed more than ever. A secondary benefit from education and training projects is that they are excellent forums to bring Participants in our EU training seminar June 2012 together Green actors from across Europe. They are opportunities to share experiences, discuss the different national contexts that exist and find common ground for a range of issues. Through The training seminars included the continuation such information sharing, we aim to underpin of GEF’s ‘EU Toolkit for the Green activist’, which a more coherent Green movement that has the provided Green activists with an intensive three- skills and the knowledge to engage with the day course on how the EU operates and how they European project. can influence it. An equally popular seminar held In 2012, GEF’s most exciting opportunities in February focused on the Eurozone crisis and for education and training were its range of the potential Green solutions to it. transnational seminars and its cooperation in a number of summer universities across Europe. CORE AREAS OF WORK In 2012 GEF cooperated in a number of summer universities across Europe, which were excellent opportunities for people interested in political ecology to meet and discuss issues as varied as climate change, democracy and the green economy. For 2013, GEF has an even more ambitious agenda for education and training. As well as continuing the cooperation with summer universities, GEF Participants at our EU training seminar held in Brussels June 2012 will also be organising training seminars on social rights, energy policy and how the EU operates. Networking Green Europe GEF’s 2012 FOR ME... Providing networking opportunities continues Verónica Juzgado, participant to be a core part of GEF’s work, and now takes at the Green Summer place through a variety of means such as online, University, Vitoria, Spain through conferences and by organising exchanges Green Summer between Greens. After five years of operation, University; Vitoria, GEF’s capacity to do this has grown at steady Spain, August 2012. rate. GEF has by now worked with hundreds of speakers and experts, and its number of European At the Green University we talked about Spain, and national partner organisations continues to but not only.
Recommended publications
  • “Green Policies Are About Our Entire Way of Life”
    “Green Policies Are about Our Entire Way of Life” Article by Inés Sabanés August 31, 2021 The Covid-19 pandemic is the latest in a string of crises Spain has faced in recent years, which have left the country weakened and many worried about its future. With elections on the horizon, Member of the Spanish Parliament Inés Sabanés explains how an all-encompassing Green vision can transform every aspect of society, and why Europe has the potential to help Spain overcome many of its difficulties. Green European Journal: From the perspective of the Greens (Verdes Equo), what are the key political issues facing Spain in 2021? Inés Sabanés: The pandemic has reset political priorities at both the Spanish and European levels. Three fundamental issues stick out; they were important during the 2021 Madrid elections and are present throughout our daily political life. First is the economic and social recovery: in response to the crisis caused by the pandemic but also in connection to the climate emergency. The distribution of projects arising from European funds needs to bring us out of this crisis through a fundamental structural change to the way our country works. Spain today is too susceptible to crises – our economy is overdependent on tourism for example – and needs to build its future on a more solid, productive, and better developed economic model. The second major issue is the rise of the far right. Frequent elections have been a fundamental error and a lack of consensus between parties in government has led to a rise in the number of far-right members of parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to the Commission Regarding Printers Voluntary Agreement
    Brussels, Wednesday 26th of May To: Mr Virginijus Sinkevičius, European Commissioner for Environment, Oceans and Fisheries Mr Thierry Breton, European Commissioner for the Internal Market Mr Frans Timmermans, European Commission Executive Vice-President for the European Green Deal We urge the European Commission to keep its promises and propose a regulatory measure addressing the durability and repairability of printers as well as the reusability of cartridges as part of the forthcoming Circular Electronics Initiative. And we ask that the Commission rejects the proposed voluntary agreement drafted by manufacturers. The Commission's flagship Circular Economy Action Plan, adopted in March 2020, has set out to address the entire life cycle of products and tackle their premature obsolescence notably by promoting the right to repair for ICT products. In addition to mobile phones, laptops and tablets, the Plan has rightfully identified printers as a particularly wasteful product category, and has included a commitment to tackle them by means of a dedicated regulatory instrument “unless the sector reaches an ambitious voluntary agreement” by September 2020. Nearly one year later, the discussions on the voluntary agreement have not yielded any tangible results. Voluntary approaches clearly do not work. We need strong regulatory action now. We are extremely concerned by this situation. Not only because of the negative impacts of short-lived printers on the environment and on consumers but also because we are witnessing promises made being walked back on. Printers are one of the most iconic examples of premature obsolescence. Our analysis of printers in use today suggests that over 80% of them have been in use for less than 3 years, and only about 4% have been in use for 5 years or longer.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Deal – the Coordinators
    Green Deal – The Coordinators David Sassoli S&D ”I want the European Green Deal to become Europe’s hallmark. At the heart of it is our commitment to becoming the world’s first climate-neutral continent. It is also a long-term economic imperative: those who act first European Parliament and fastest will be the ones who grasp the opportunities from the ecological transition. I want Europe to be 1 February 2020 – H1 2024 the front-runner. I want Europe to be the exporter of knowledge, technologies and best practice.” — Ursula von der Leyen Lorenzo Mannelli Klaus Welle President of the European Commission Head of Cabinet Secretary General Chairs and Vice-Chairs Political Group Coordinators EPP S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe ENVI Renew Committee on Europe Dan-Ştefan Motreanu César Luena Peter Liese Jytte Guteland Nils Torvalds Silvia Sardone Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator the Environment, Public Health Greens/EFA GUE/NGL Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Food Safety Pacal Canfin Chair Bas Eickhout Anja Hazekamp Bas Eickhout Alexandr Vondra Silvia Modig Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator S&D S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe EPP ITRE Patrizia Toia Lina Gálvez Muñoz Christian Ehler Dan Nica Martina Dlabajová Paolo Borchia Committee on Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Industry, Research Renew ECR Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Energy Cristian Bușoi Europe Chair Morten Petersen Zdzisław Krasnodębski Ville Niinistö Zdzisław Krasnodębski Marisa Matias Vice-Chair Vice-Chair
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 European Elections Candidates Who Have Signed the End FGM European Network 7 Point Manifesto
    2019 European Elections Candidates who have signed The End FGM European Network 7 point Manifesto Name Country National Party Abdirahim Husu Finland Social Democratic Party of Hussein Finland (SDP) Alviina Alametsä Finland Vihreä liitto Anna Jungner- Finland Svenska folkpartiet Nordgren Anna Mäkipää Finland Vasemmistoliitto Annina Ruottu Finland Suomen Keskusta Bicca Olin Finland Vihreä liitto Catharina Von Finland Svenska folkpartiet Schoultz Elisa Lientola Finland Vasemmistoliitto Fatim Diarra Finland Vihreä liitto Hanna Halmeenpää Finland Vihreä liitto Heidi Hautala Finland Vihreä liitto Helena Marttila Finland Social Democratic Party of Finland (SDP) Iiris Suomela Finland Vihreä liitto Jaana Ylitalo Finland Social Democratic Party of Finland (SDP) Janne Parkkila Finland Vasemmistoliitto Joona Mielonen Finland Vasemmistoliitto Juha Huhtala Finland Greens Kaisa Penny Finland Social Democratic Party of Finland (SDP) Katju Aro Finland Feministinen puolue Lotta Alhonnoro Finland Vihreä liitto Marek Necada Finland Piraattipuolue Maritta Mynttinen Finland Suomen Keskusta For more information, please check out our website: http://www.endfgm.eu/ Mia Haglund Finland Vasemmistoliitto Miapetra Kumpula- Finland Social Democratic Party of Natri Finland (SDP) Miikka Keränen Finland Vihreä liitto Miila Halonen Finland Vasemmistoliitto Mirka Soinikoski Finland Vihreä liitto Olli-Poika Finland Vihreä liitto Parviainen Rauli Virtanen Finland Vihreä liitto Riku Eskelinen Finland Suomen Keskusta Saara Hyrkkö Finland Vihreä liitto Sameli Sivonen Finland Vihreä liitto Silja Keranen Finland Vihreä liitto Silvia Modig Finland Vasemmistoliitto Sinikka Torkkola Finland Vasemmistoliitto Sirpa Pietikäinen Finland Kansallinen Kokoomus Sonja Falk Finland Kristillisdemokraatit Tero Hannula Finland Feministinen puolue Tiina Ahlfors Finland Vasemmistoliitto Veli Liikanen Finland Green League/Vihreä liitto Ville Niinistö Finland Green League/Vihreä liitto For more information, please check out our website: http://www.endfgm.eu/ .
    [Show full text]
  • Green Parties and Elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Green Par Elections
    Chapter 1 Green Parties and Elections, 1979–2019 Green parties and elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Wolfgang Rüdig Introduction The history of green parties in Europe is closely intertwined with the history of elections to the European Parliament. When the first direct elections to the European Parliament took place in June 1979, the development of green parties in Europe was still in its infancy. Only in Belgium and the UK had green parties been formed that took part in these elections; but ecological lists, which were the pre- decessors of green parties, competed in other countries. Despite not winning representation, the German Greens were particularly influ- enced by the 1979 European elections. Five years later, most partic- ipating countries had seen the formation of national green parties, and the first Green MEPs from Belgium and Germany were elected. Green parties have been represented continuously in the European Parliament since 1984. Subsequent years saw Greens from many other countries joining their Belgian and German colleagues in the Euro- pean Parliament. European elections continued to be important for party formation in new EU member countries. In the 1980s it was the South European countries (Greece, Portugal and Spain), following 4 GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE their successful transition to democracies, that became members. Green parties did not have a strong role in their national party systems, and European elections became an important focus for party develop- ment. In the 1990s it was the turn of Austria, Finland and Sweden to join; green parties were already well established in all three nations and provided ongoing support for Greens in the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Dimensions and Alignments in European Union Politics: Cognitive Constraints and Partisan Responses
    Working Paper Series in European Studies Volume 1, Number 3 Dimensions and Alignments in European Union Politics: Cognitive Constraints and Partisan Responses DR. SIMON HIX DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE Houghton Street London, WC2A 2AE United Kingdom ([email protected]) EDITORIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE: GILLES BOUSQUET KEITH COHEN COLLEEN DUNLAVY ANDREAS KAZAMIAS LEON LINDBERG ELAINE MARKS ANNE MINER ROBERT OSTERGREN MARK POLLACK GREGORY SHAFFER MARC SILBERMAN JONATHAN ZEITLIN Copyright © 1998 All rights reserved. No part of this paper may be reproduced in any form without permission of the author. European Studies Program, International Institute, University of Wisconsin--Madison Madison, Wisconsin http://polyglot.lss.wisc.edu/eur/ 1 Dimensions and Alignments in European Union Politics: Cognitive Constraints and Partisan Responses Simon Hix Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom Abstract As the European Union (EU) has evolved, the study agenda has shifted from ‘European integration’ to ‘EU politics’. Missing from this new agenda, however, is an understanding of the ‘cognitive constraints’ on actors, and how actors respond: i.e. the shape of the EU ‘political space’ and the location of social groups and competition between actors within this space. The article develops a theoretical framework for understanding the shape of the EU political space (the interaction between an Integration-Independence and a Left-Right dimension and the location of class and sectoral groups within this map), and tests this framework on the policy positions of the Socialist, Christian Democrat and Liberal party leaders between 1976 and 1994 (using the techniques of the ECPR Party Manifestos Group Project).
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to EU Telecom and Trade Ministers and to European Commissioners Thierry Breton, Margrethe Vestager and Valdis Dombrovskis
    Letter to EU telecom and trade ministers and to European Commissioners Thierry Breton, Margrethe Vestager and Valdis Dombrovskis We, the undersigned Members of the European Parliament from five different political groups, share a common concern regarding 5G security in Europe and unfair competition between European and Chinese 5G vendors. Therefore, we send this letter to you in preparation of the upcoming informal TTE Council on 15 October, urging you to take action on the points raised. We have learnt from the COVID-19 crisis that maintaining know-how, capacity and some level of independence in critical sectors, including medical/pharmaceutical, food supplies, and utilities, i.e. energy, water and communications infrastructure is indispensable for our survival. In the area of connectivity, COVID-19 has demonstrated how vital fixed and mobile connectivity is to help fight the crisis and to keep the economy and essential services running to the extent possible. The European Commission has, already pre-crisis, launched a number of initiatives to preserve our security and sovereignty, which today prove to be more relevant than ever before. These include a renewed industrial strategy with digitization and connectivity at its heart, increased funding proposals for connectivity, cyber security and AI, the investment screening framework to avoid harmful foreign take-overs of critical EU businesses, trade policy initiatives promoting reciprocity, and more concretely, the 5G security joint risk assessment and toolbox of mitigating measures. 5G is a central element in Europe’s digital sovereignty and the EU 5G security initiative rightly has the aim of safeguarding the security of 5G as a critical infrastructure for Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • ALLIANCE 90/THE GREENS: Party Program and Principles the Future Is Green
    The future is green. ALLIANCE 90/THE GREENS: Party Program and Principles The future is green. ALLIANCE 90/THE GREENS: Party Program and Principles Preamble 7 I. Our values 7 Ecology is sustainability 8 Freedom is realised through self-determination 8 Extending equitability 9 Democracy is the basis 10 The touchstone of our values: Human rights and non-violence 11 II. Challenges in a changing world 12 III. Where we come from – who we are 16 IV. Twelve for 2020 17 Towards the ecological age 18 I. The fundamental principles of our environmental policy 19 II. Sustainable development as a principle for action 20 III. Economical use of resources and the efficiency revolution 21 IV. Ecology and lifestyle 22 V. New energy – from the fossil and nuclear age to the solar future 22 A key project: Towards the solar age 24 Sustainable development in towns and local areas 25 VI. Environmentally-friendly traffic systems 27 A key project: Ecologically mobile 29 1 The future is green. VII. Nature and landscape conservancy 30 VIII. Animals need rights 31 IX. A global perspective for the environment and development 32 Towards an ecological and social market economy 34 I. The foundations of our economic policy 35 A key project: The future of a united Germany 38 II. Market economy and regulative policy 39 A key project: Transparency for consumers 40 III. Ecological fiscal reform 40 IV. Consumer protection 41 V. The knowledge economy 41 VI. Regional economies 42 A key project: A new form of agriculture 43 VII. A sustainable fiscal policy 45 VIII.
    [Show full text]
  • (SRHR) in European Institutions. by Elena
    Study for POLICY MAKERS on opposition to sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) in European institutions. by Elena Zacharenko Anti-gender mobilisations in Europe Study for policy makers on opposition to sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) in European institutions Author: Elena Zacharenko This study has been commissioned by Heidi Hautala MEP, Vice President of the European Parliament. Published in December 2020 Book cover illustration, design and layout by Laura Ospina - www.lauraennube.com 2 Table of CONTENTS Foreword from MEP Heidi Hautala.............................................................04 Executive summary.......................................................................................06 What is this study and who is it for? ........................................................... 08 Part 1: What drives the anti-gender movement?...........................................10 1.1 Origins and current manifestations...........................................................12 1.2 Global connections ..................................................................................13 1.3 The anti-gender movement in the EU...................................................... 16 1.4 Is it a backlash?........................................................................................23 1.5 Recommendations...................................................................................24 Part 2: Main anti-gender actors and their tactics at EU level........................26 2.1 Lobbying organisations
    [Show full text]
  • En En Amendments 1
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Budgetary Control 2020/2141(DEC) 9.2.2021 AMENDMENTS 1 - 221 Draft report Petri Sarvamaa (PE657.149v01-00) 2019 discharge: General budget of the EU - European Parliament (2020/2141(DEC)) AM\1239522EN.docx PE680.810v02-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_NonLegReport PE680.810v02-00 2/130 AM\1239522EN.docx EN Amendment 1 Petri Sarvamaa Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 Proposal for a decision Amendment 1. Grants its President discharge in 1. Grants its President discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Parliament for the of the European Parliament for the financial year 2019/Postpones its decision financial year 2019; on granting its President discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Parliament for the financial year 2019; Or. en Amendment 2 Sabrina Pignedoli Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Motion for a resolution Amendment 10. Notes the specific finding, 10. Notes the specific finding, concerning Parliament, contained in the concerning Parliament, contained in the annual report of the Court for 2019; notes annual report of the Court for 2019; notes with concern that the Court found errors in with concern that the Court found errors in one payment to one of the European one payment to one of the European political parties, which concerned non- political parties, which concerned non- compliance with the expenditure eligibility compliance with the expenditure eligibility rules, specifically,
    [Show full text]