DOCSLIB.ORG

Book of Abstracts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Book of Abstracts Human-bear coexistence in human dominated and politically fragmented landscapes. BOOK OF ABSTRACTS Ljubljana, Slovenia 16 - 21 September 2018 Conference Venue: The Grand Hotel Union www.lifewithbears.eu #lifewithbears Book of Abstracts available #26thIBAconference @www.lifewithbears.eu 1 Published by: University of Ljubljana Cover design and layout: Anja Nič Editor: Aleksandra Majić Skrbinšek Edition: e-book Ljubljana, 2018 Suggested citation: Majić Skrbinšek A. (Ed.), 2018, Human-bear coexistence in human dominated and politically fragmented landscapes. Abstract book of the 26th International conference on Bear Research and Management, 16- 21 September, Ljubljana, Slovenia. ISBN 978-961-6410-52-6 (pdf) COBISS.SI-ID: 296548096 2 SCIENTIFIC PROGRAM COMMITTEE 26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BEAR RESEARCH MANAGEMENT “Human-bear coexistence in human dominated and politically fragmented landscapes.” Ljubljana, 16 - 21 September 2018 Conference Venue: The Grand Hotel Union Coordinator: Aleksandra Majić Skrbinšek, University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Biology Department, Ljubljana, Slovenia Members: Alexandros A. Karamanlidis, ARCTUROS, Civil Society for the Protection and Management of Wildlife and the Natural Environment, Aetos, Greece & Rewilding Europe, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Anja Molinari Jobin, Italian Lynx Project, Tarvisio, Italy Claudio Groff, Servizio Foreste e Fauna – Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Italy Đuro Huber, Biology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, Croatia Frank T. van Manen, U.S. Geological Survey, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team, Bozeman, Montana, USA Ivan Kos, University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Biology Department, Ljubljana, Slovenia Georg Rauer, Research Institute of Wildlife Ecology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria Klemen Jerina, University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Forestry Department, Ljubljana, Slovenia Marta De Barba, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LECA, 38000 Grenoble, France Martyn Obbard, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada Miha Krofel, University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Forestry Department, Ljubljana, Slovenia Seth Wilson, W.A. Franke College of Forestry & Conservation – University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA and Northern Rockies Conservation Cooperative, Jackson, WY, USA Slaven Reljić, Biology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, Croatia Rok Černe, Slovenia Forest Service, Ljubljana, Slovenia Tomaž Skrbinšek, University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Biology Department, Ljubljana, Slovenia 3 CONTENTS INVITED SPEAKERS 4 Tom Smith: Chronicling Human-Bear Conflict: Commentary and Caveats 5 Valeria Salvatori: EU LIFE programme contribution to bear conservation 6 Andrés Ordiz: “Overview of human effects on bear behavior in human-dominated landscapes 7 John D C Linnell : Coexistence: what is it, and how do we get there? 8 Djuro Huber: Half a century of IBA Conferences – an illustrated evolution 9 Rachel Hoffmann 10 ORAL PRESENTATIONS 11 Session: Bear ecology, behaviour and physiology 11 Session: Bears and climate change 31 Session: Bears and society 36 Session: IUCN Bear Specialist Group: What would have been without us? 47 Session: Human-bear interactions and management 53 Session: Molecular genetics in bear conservation and management 71 Session: Spatial requirements and demographic characteristics of bear populations 77 POSTER PRESENTATIONS 87 Session: Bears and climate change 126 Session: Bears and society 127 Session: Ex situ conservation 146 Session: Human-bear interactions and management 147 Session: Molecular genetics in bear conservation and management 175 Session: Spatial requirements and demographic characteristics of bear populations 188 4 INVITED SPEAKERS TOM SMITH: CHRONICLING HUMAN-BEAR CONFLICT: COMMENTARY AND CAVEATS Brigham Young University Biography Dr. Tom S. Smith began a career in bear biology in 1992 when hired as a research ecologist for Katmai National Park, Alaska. Research topics at the time included brown bear ecology, human-bear interactions and bear safety research. Working jointly with Dr. Stephen Herrero, Smith has co-authored papers on human-bear conflict including the efficacy of bear deterrents and histories of bear conflict in North America. In the early 2000s, as a USGS research scientist, Smith began work with polar bears, focusing on denning ecology and human-bear interactions on Alaska’s North Slope. Working closely with Polar Bears International, his studies of denned polar bears continues to present. Most recently, he has been studying sloth bear-human conflict in India with colleagues at India’s Wildlife SOS. Smith currently serves as a member of the Polar Bear Conflict Work Group and as a professor of wildlife at Brigham Young University, Utah. Abstract Effective bear conservation is a challenging and multifaceted task faced by biologists and managers worldwide. Studies of bear habitat relationships, ecology, behaviour, physiology, and conflict with humans are critical for maintaining species’ viability. Conflict with humans is not only bad for both the bear and persons involved, but also impedes conservation efforts. It is a difficult task to promote the conservation of a species that occasionally maims and kills people. Chronicling human-bear conflict is essential if we are to understand why these events occur. Insight gained from well-documented and analysed incidents helps to inform bear safety messaging that, in turn, lessens conflict. n this presentation, I discuss the importance of human-bear conflict databases. Additionally, I present how we can use those data to inform bear safety messaging in such a way that reduces conflict. Finally, I present caveats associated with these data, and suggest how we might avoid the pitfalls of over-reach when it comes to data interpretation. 5 VALERIA SALVATORI: EU LIFE PROGRAMME CONTRIBUTION TO BEAR CONSERVATION Istituto di Ecologia Applicata, Via B. Eustachio 10 – IT 00616 Rome Biography Wildlife conservation, applied research and management are the main interests of Valeria Salvatori. She has worked in international environments collaborating with foreign research institutes since 1992, gathering working experience in South America, Africa, Central and Western Europe. Spatial analyses of environmental processes, mainly wildlife management, policies and conflicts between wildlife and local communities are the subjects of her latest working activities. She has extensive experience in evaluating, elaborating and managing LIFE projects on large carnivores. She acted as project coordinator for the following LIFE projects: LIFE COEX, LIFE ARCTOS, LIFE IBRIWOLF, LIFE MEDWOLF and provided consultancy for LIFE WOLFALPS. Her current position at Istituto di Ecologia Applicata in Rome, Italy is project responsible for the service contract with the EU for establishing local stakeholder platforms for promoting coexistence with large carnivores. Abstract Since its launch in 1992 the EU LIFE programme has supported the Member States in their efforts for the implementation of the EU Habitats Directive through co-funding of specifically targeted projects aimed at improving the conservation status of species or habitats of community interest. The conservation of Brown bear (Ursus arctos) in Europe has been strongly supported by the implementation of 71 projects, of which 60 exclusively targeting bears. The most targeted populations are the smallest European ones (Cantabrian, Pyrenean, Alpine, Apennine) with the implementation of 52 projects.The overall contribution of the EC for bear conservation through LIFE programme can be estimated at over 47Mio Euros, with an amplification effect promoted by co-funding (total project costs over 71Mio Euros).Most projects were implemented by NGOs or local authorities responsible for bear management, thus increasing the probability that conservation actions could be continued after the project’s end.Other targeted populations include the Dinaric-Pindos one and the Carpathian one. These are very large population that are distributed over many countries and in particular for the Dinaric- Pindos one projects have been implemented at local scales by different countries in various segments of the population. The impact of LIFE projects is evident for the smallest populations, with a significant increase in their conservation status (e.g., Cantabrian and Alpine populations), but also for larger populations the activities implemented have provided a significant contribution at local level, triggering demonstration effects through implementation of best practice actions. While the first projects (up to 1996) where characterised by general conservation interventions, the ones from 1997 were more focused on specifically identified threats, although they not always were coherent with those identified by the IUCN red listing. This incoherence is justified by the scale of implementation of LIFE projects, most often local, where specific context related threats may not be relevant at population of State level. Social issues have been increasingly targeted, reflecting the general trend of increasing social conflicts Europe-wide. LIFE programme represents a solid instrument for European Brown bear conservation and should continue to play this key role in the future. 6 ANDRÉS ORDIZ: OVERVIEW OF HUMAN EFFECTS ON BEAR BEHAVIOR IN HUMAN-DOMINATED LANDSCAPES Faculty of Environmental
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Italy's Abruzzo National Park - Wildlife Festival
    The Apennines: Italy's Abruzzo National Park - Wildlife Festival Naturetrek Tour Itinerary Outline itinerary Day 1 Fly Rome and transfer to Pescasseroli Day 2/7 A programme of wildlife walks in the Abruzzo National Park from Pescasseroli Day 8 Transfer to Rome and fly London Departs May 2019 Focus Mammals, plants, birds, and butterflies Grading Day walks only with different options offered daily Prices See website (tour code ITA06) or brochure Highlights Look for Marsican Brown Bear, Wolf and Apennine Chamois. Enjoy a myriad of plants, butterflies and birds in the Apennines. Enjoy daily walks in this stunning National Park. Look for Great Sooty Satyr, Blue-spot Hairstreak and numerous other butterflies. Birds may include Golden Eagle, Wryneck, Red- backed Shrike and Rock Thrush. Led by multiple expert Naturetrek leaders. Abruzzo Chamois, Lady Slipper Orchid (Lee Morgan) Marsican Brown Bear (Paolo Iannicca). Naturetrek Mingledown Barn Wolf’s Lane Chawton Alton Hampshire GU34 3HJ UK T: +44 (0)1962 733051 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk The Apennines: Italy's Abruzzo National Park – Wildlife Festival Introduction Stretching the length of Italy, the Apennine Mountains provide a refuge for much of Italy’s most interesting natural history. This is very much a working rural landscape of rolling hills and traditional sheep farming, made special by its wealth of atmospheric mediaeval villages, traditional cuisine and aromatic local wines, all of which combine to make this holiday a well-rounded and enjoyable Italian experience. Set in the heart of the Apennines is the Abruzzo National Park, established by royal decree in 1923 and today protecting an area of 400 square kilometres.
    [Show full text]
  • Brown Bear Conservation Action Plan for Europe
    Chapter 6 Brown Bear Conservation Action Plan for Europe IUCN Category: Lower Risk, least concern CITES Listing: Appendix II Scientific Name: Ursus arctos Common Name: brown bear Figure 6.1. General brown bear (Ursus arctos) distribution in Europe. European Brown Bear Action Plan (Swenson, J., et al., 1998). 250 km ICELAND 250 miles Original distribution Current distribution SWEDEN FINLAND NORWAY ESTONIA RUSSIA LATVIA DENMARK IRELAND LITHUANIA UK BELARUS NETH. GERMANY POLAND BELGIUM UKRAINE LUX. CZECH SLOVAKIA MOLDOVA FRANCE AUSTRIA SWITZERLAND HUNGARY SLOVENIA CROATIA ROMANIA BOSNIA HERZ. THE YUGOSL. FEDER. ANDORRA BULGARIA PORTUGAL ITALY MACEDONIA SPAIN ALBANIA TURKEY GREECE CYPRUS 55 Introduction assumed to live in southwestern Carinthia, representing an outpost of the southern Slovenian population expanding In Europe the brown bear (Ursus arctos) once occupied into the border area with Austria and Italy (Gutleb 1993a most of the continent including Scandinavia, but since and b). The second population is located in the Limestone about 1850 has been restricted to a more reduced range Alps of Styria and Lower Austria and comprises 8–10 (Servheen 1990), see Figure 6.1. individuals; it is the result of a reintroduction project started by WWF-Austria in 1989. In addition to these populations, the Alps of Styria and Carinthia and to a lesser Status and management of the extent also of Salzburg and Upper Austria, are visited by brown bear in Austria migrating individuals with increasing frequency. A third Georg Rauer center of bear distribution is emerging in northwestern Styria and the bordering areas of Upper Austria (Dachstein, Distribution and current status Totes Gebirge, and Sengsengebirge) where, since 1990, 1–3 bears have been present almost continuously (Frei, J., At present, there are just a few brown bears living in Bodner, M., Sorger, H.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Heart Rate During Hyperphagia Differs Between Two Bear Species
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Brage INN Physiology Heart rate during hyperphagia differs royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsbl between two bear species Boris Fuchs1,†, Koji Yamazaki2,†, Alina L. Evans1, Toshio Tsubota3, Shinsuke Koike4,5, Tomoko Naganuma5 and Jon M. Arnemo1,6 Research 1Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Applied Ecology and Agricultural Sciences, Cite this article: Fuchs B, Yamazaki K, Evans Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Campus Evenstad, 2418 Elverum, Norway 2Department of Forest Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture, 1-1-1 Sakuragaoka, Setagaya-Ku, Tokyo, Japan AL, Tsubota T, Koike S, Naganuma T, Arnemo 3Department of Environmental Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita18, JM. 2019 Heart rate during hyperphagia differs Nishi9, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan between two bear species. Biol. Lett. 15: 4Institute of Global Innovation Research, and 5United Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tokyo University 20180681. of Agriculture and Technology, 3-5-8 Saiwai, Fuchu-city, Tokyo, Japan 6Department of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Faculty of Forest Sciences, Swedish University of http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0681 Agricultural Sciences, 901 83, Umea˚, Sweden BF, 0000-0003-3412-3490; ALE, 0000-0003-0513-4887 Received: 28 September 2018 Hyperphagia is a critical part of the yearly cycle of bears when they gain fat reserves before entering hibernation. We used heart rate as a proxy to com- Accepted: 17 December 2018 pare the metabolic rate between the Asian black bear (Ursus thibetanus)in Japan and the Eurasian brown bear (Ursus arctos) in Sweden from summer into hibernation.
    [Show full text]
  • Bear Smart Community Genzana Final Report 2017
    Bear Smart Community Genzana Final report 2017 1. Executive summary The project Marsican Bear Smart Community Genzana (BSCG)1 of Salviamo l’Orso2 (SLO), in partnership with the Monte Genzana Alto Gizio Nature Reserve (NRMGAG), the municipalities of Pettorano sul Gizio and Rocca Pia and the associations Rewilding Apennines and Dalla parte dell’Orso, started in 2015 thanks to an IBA’s grant. Since then, IBA has supported this project with a total donation of USD 15,000. The BSCG is set in the municipal territory of Pettorano sul Gizio (~41˚58′ N 13˚57′ E) and Rocca Pia (~41˚56′ N 13˚58′ E), identified by mount Genzana, which gives also the name to the local regional nature reserve Monte Genzana Alto Gizio. This area is a wildlife corridor of crucial importance for wildlife movements from the Abruzzo, Lazio and Molise (ALMNP) and the Majella National Park (MNP). In particular, in the last 5 years the presence of individuals of the Marsican brown bear (Ursus arctos marsicanus, Altobello, 1921) in this corridor has increased giving higher chances to this small relict population to persist. The Marsican brown bear is a subspecies of Ursus arctos that the IUCN has included in the Italian Red List3 as “critically endangered”. The latest genetic research4 from the University of Ferrara proved the uniqueness of this subspecies that, probably isolated for thousands of years because of people, developed its own morphological and behavioural characteristics. The Bear Smart Community Genzana originates from the need to secure this important wildlife corridor from negative impact of interactions between people and wildlife, bears in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015-03 1Cover.Indd
    International Bear News Tri-Annual Newsletter of the International Association for Bear Research and Management (IBA) and the IUCN/SSC Bear Specialist Group Spring 2015 Vol. 24 no.1 Rescued sun bears at Bornean Sun Bear Conservation Centre often display some amazing arboreal behavior. This adult female bear sleeps comfortably on some lianas high above the ground. Photo Credit Lin May Chiew/BSBCC. Read more on rescued sun bears on page 24. IBA website: www.bearbiology.org Table of Contents INTERNATIONAL BEAR NEWS MANAGEMENT CORNER (CON’T) 3 International Bear News, ISSN #1064-1564 36 Understanding the Ecology and Epidemiology of Mange in Pennsylvania IBA PRESIDENT⁄IUCN BSG CO-CHAIRS Black Bears 4 President’s Column 38 Agency and Private Use of Conducted 5 Brown Bear(s) Do Exist in Syria: Fuzzy Photo Electrical Weapons for Human-Bear Generates Much Interest Conflict Resolution 9 We Protect What We Fall in Love With REVEIWS CONFERENCE REPORTS 39 Book Review – Dominion of Bears: Living 10 23rd International Bear Conference on Bear with Wildlife in Alaska Research and Management, 5-11 October, 40 Video Review – CNN’s Inside Man Zoo 2014, Thessaloniki, Greece Episode with Special Commentary on Bears in Zoological Parks CONSERVATION 24 Bornean Sun Bear Conservation Centre COMMUNICATIONS Opens To The Public 42 Bear Viewing in Alaska and IBA 2016 42 IBA 2016 Anchorage Conference: Session on ILLEGAL TRADE Bear Viewing and Behavior 25 Coordinated Enforcement Efforts Needed to Combat Illegal Trafficking in Bears SYMPOSIUM REPORTS 43 III International
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Methods for Measuring National Distributions and Densities of Wild
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.30.193078; this version posted July 31, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. Developing methods for measuring national distributions and densities of wild mammals using camera traps: A Kosovo study Sarah E. Beatham1*, Alastair I. Ward1,2, David Fouracre1, Jeton Muhaxhiri3, Michael Sallmann4, Besim Zogu5, Valdet Gjinovci6, Anthony J. Wilsmore3, Graham C. Smith1 1 National Wildlife Management Centre, APHA, Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ, United Kingdom 2 School of Environmental Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, United Kingdom 3 Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics Research Unit (VEERU) & PAN Livestock Services Ltd., University of Reading, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, Reading, RG6 6AR, United Kingdom 4 Department of Veterinary Affairs and Consumer Protection of the Odenwald County, Scheffelstrasse 11, D- 64385 Reichelsheim, Hesse, Germany 5 Kosovo Forest Agency, Ernest Koliqi Street, 10000 Prishtina, Republic of Kosovo 6 Food and Veterinary Agency, Industrial Zone, 10000 Prishtina, Republic of Kosovo *Corresponding author: [email protected], orcid.org/0000-0001-8300-8953 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.30.193078; this version posted July 31, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
    [Show full text]
  • Grizzly Bear Management Plan for Western Montana
    GRIZZLY BEAR MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR WESTERN MONTANA DRAFT PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 2006‐2016 With input from the Montana Grizzly Bear Working Groups and other interested parties June 2006 GRIZZLY BEAR MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR WESTERN MONTANA DRAFT PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 2006‐2016 Prepared by: Arnold R. Dood, Shirley J. Atkinson and Vanna J. Boccadori Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks 1400 S 19th Ave, Bozeman, Montana With input from the Montana Grizzly Bear Working Groups and other interested parties June 2006 For further information, please contact: Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks P. O. Box 200701 Helena, MT 596200‐0701 (406) 444‐3186 Suggested Citation: Dood, A. R., Atkinson, S. J. and V. J. Boccadori (2006) Grizzly Bear Management Plan for Western Montana: draft programmatic environmental impact statement 2006‐2016. Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, Helena, Montana. 143 pp. Front Cover: Grizzly bear (Ursus arctos). Sketch drawn by Clint E. Chapman. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people participated in the development of this plan. Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks (FWP) would like to express gratitude to all those who committed their time and energy to ensure our program was adequate to meet the needs of bears and the people who live with them. FWP would like to recognize the following individuals who assisted in the document process and preparation: Margaret Morelli, Joan Buhl, Julie VanWinkle, and Tom Palmer. Special recognition is due to the following individuals and organizations for their assistance through participation in our workshops. By recognizing their participation, we are by no means implying that they support the plan in part or in its entirety.
    [Show full text]
  • Finland – Just Brown Bears!
    Finland – Just Brown Bears! Naturetrek Tour Itinerary Outline itinerary Day 1 Fly Kajaani or Oulu and transfer to Martinselkosen Wilds Centre. Day 2/3 Brown Bear watching and birdwatching from Martinselkosen Wilds Centre. Day 4 Transfer to Kajaani or Oulu and fly London. Departs May, June, July & August Focus Brown Bears, other mammals, birds and general natural history. Grading A straightforward wildlife tour with gentle forest walks. Grade A/B. Dates and Prices Visit www.naturetrek.co.uk (tour code FIN02) or see the current Naturetrek brochure Highlights: The best opportunity to view Brown Bears in Europe Spend the night in a comfortable log-cabin hide Over 20 different bears a night enjoyed by past tours! Superb photographic opportunities Elk, Red Deer & Red Squirrel also possible Birds include Siberian Jay, Black-throated Diver, White-tailed Eagle & Brambling Extend your tour to search for Wolverine, Wolf, Beaver or Flying Squirrel From top: European Brown Bears & Black-throated Diver. Naturetrek Mingledown Barn Wolf’s Lane Chawton Alton Hampshire GU34 3HJ UK T: +44 (0)1962 733051 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Finland – Just Brown Bears! Tour Itinerary Introduction The Eurasian Brown Bear has a fragmented range extending across most of Europe, but it is a creature that requires large tracts of undisturbed country in order to exist and as the human population has expanded, so that of the Brown Bear has contracted. Today, the small numbers that still survive, do so in the more remote, inaccessible areas of the continent and nowhere are these qualities better exemplified than in the wilderness along the Russian border with Finland.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2019 Vol
    International Bear News Tri-Annual Newsletter of the International Association for Bear Research and Management (IBA) and the IUCN/SSC Bear Specialist Group Summer 2019 Vol. 28 no. 2 Bears with suspected mange (credit: Pennsylvania Game Commission). See page 26 for more on surveillance and management considerations for mange in black bears. IBA website: www.bearbiology.org Table of Contents INTERNATIONAL BEAR NEWS 3 International Bear News, ISSN #1064-1564 IBA PRESIDENT/IUCN BSG CO-CHAIRS 4 President’s Column COMMUNICATIONS 6 Bear Conservation Could Learn from the 33 Book: What Bears Teach Us – Invitation to Game of Thrones Contribute IBA MEMBER NEWS REVIEWS 8 2019 IBA Election Information 34 Book Review: Scientific English Writing: 10 Transition News How to Write Scientific Papers in English, by Malcolm Fitz-Earle, 2018 CONSERVATION 11 Fate of Orphaned Bears in Iran WORKSHOP REPORTS 13 Sun Bear Global Status Review and 35 Summary of the 24th Eastern Black Bear Conservation Action Plan Launched Workshop 15 Distribution and Conservation Status of Tien-Shan Brown Bear in the Kyrgyz CONFERENCE ANNOUNCEMENTS Republic 37 27th International Conference On Bear 18 Bear Release in Iraqi Kurdistan Must Stop Research & Management, September 21 – 25, 2020, Kalispell, Montana, United States HUMAN-BEAR CONFLICTS 20 Working for Andean Bear Conservation WORKSHOP ANNOUNCEMENTS in Peru: Joining Forces for Human–Bear 38 First International Workshop on Developing Conflict Reduction Population Monitoring Guidelines for Asian 22 Arrival of a Brown Bear on a Remote Island Bears November 4-8, 2019, Taipei, Taiwan of Hokkaido, Japan 38 Human-Bear Conflict Conference, October 4-7, 2021, Lake Tahoe, Nevada, United BIOLOGICAL RESEArcH States 24 Does a Bear Poop in the Road? A Call for 38 25th Eastern Black Bear Workshop, 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • International Bear News
    International Bear News Quarterly Newsletter of the International Association for Bear Research and Management (IBA) and the IUCN/SSC Bear Specialist Group February 2012 Vol. 21 no. 1 © A. Sapozhnikov Brown bear family near Shemonaiha, East Kazakhstan. Illegal killing is the greatest threat to these bears. Habitat degradation and loss, and displacement from ecotourism are additional threats. To learn more see article on page 27. IBA website: www.bearbiology.org Table of Contents Council News 31 Perpetual Stochasticity for Black Bears in 4 From the President Mexico 5 Research & Conservation Grants 34 Remembering Conservationist Iftikhar Ahmad 36 Bear Specialist Group Coordinating Bear Specialist Group Committee 6 What was the Last Bear to go Extinct? And what does that have to do with Present-day Conservation? Americas 8 Status of Asiatic Black Bears and Sun Bears 37 Assessing Longitudinal Diet Patterns of in Xe Pian National Protected Area, Lao Black Bears in Great Smoky Mountains PDR National Park Using Stable Carbon and 11 First Confirmed Records of Sun Bears Nitrogen Isotopes in Kulen-Promtep Wildlife Sanctuary, 39 A three legged bear in Denali and Research Northern Cambodia Updates from the Interior and Arctic 13 Status and Conservation of Asiatic Black Alaska Bears in Diamer District, Pakistan 40 Recent and Current Bear Studies in Interior 15 First Camera-trap Photos of Asiatic and Arctic Alaska Black Bears in the Bashagard Region of 42 Grizzly Bear Population Study Begins in Southeastern Iran Cabinet-Yaak Ecosystem in NW Montana/
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practice Rev. 2020 General
    BEAR-SMART COMMUNITY BEST-PRACTICE MANUAL The brown bear has featured in human culture since time immemorial, through rituals, myths, legend and folk tales. Humans have pictured bears as gods, heroes, friends, foes, and even devils. Some consider bears dangerous, others a very special animal! There are some bear species that can be dangerous for humans, for instance the grizzly bear, but this lives in North America! The Marsican brown bear of Abruzzo however is not dangerous if respected and left alone. Before becoming a protected species, it was the object of ruthless hunting which has led to its near-extinction. Despite this persecution, the cases in which a bear has been cornered or wounded by hunters and then reacted to defend itself, can be counted on the fingers of one hand. The Marsican bear is a shy animal, but it can occasionally be encountered on our mountains, and the most typical behaviour of the bear in this situation is to flee or stand on its hind legs to gain a better view, and then leave. False or bluff attacks are extremely rare but possible, these can happen in the case of a close encounter with a female with cubs, where the female, feeling threatened by our presence, would try to scare us away by feigning an attack, but without actually physically injuring anyone. Seeing the bear is the dream of many! It is a symbol of courage, strength and even affection. Words that appear to be a contradiction, but that are also complementary and perfectly describe this animal. Think of the female bear, maternal and caring of her cubs and at the same time so strong and fearless when needing to protect them from other animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Conference on Conservation Science – New York Talk And
    Student Conference on Conservation Science – New York Talk and Speed Talk Abstracts October 20–22, 2016 SCCS-NY 2016 Talk Abstracts Natalia Aristizábal Uribe, Jean Paul Metzger The University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil Land use and ant–mediated pest control services in coffee–dominated landscapes The interaction between ecosystem services (ES), biodiversity, and land cover change has been of great interest in recent years. Pest control is an important example of an ES provided by biodiversity that can be regulated by landscape structure. To investigate the relationships between landscape structure and pest control, we manipulated ants through exclusion experiments and compared coffee berries inside and outside exclusion experiments in coffee–dominated landscapes in Southeastern Brazil. We measured efficiency of pest control of the coffee borer beetle (CBB), coffee’s most economically influential pest, in exclusion of ants and among ten landscapes that differ in land cover and gradually differ in forest cover from 10–55%. We tested whether the interaction of exclusion of ants with distance to the nearest forest fragment, forest cover at two levels (2km and 300m), and coffee cover (300m–level) influence percentage of CBB infestation and coffee bean damage. Results show that CBB percentage and bean damage increase as coffee cover intensifies at the 300m–level and decreases as forest cover augments at the 2km–level. In addition, the farther away from a forest fragment, the more CBB infestation and bean damage is found. In conclusion, coffee producers benefit from the presence of ants and the inclusion of forest fragments in their properties.
    [Show full text]