2021 HCR Covered Building List
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Rethinknyc+2020-08-20A.Pdf
ReThinkNYC Requests that ReThinkNYC Proposals be Treated as Alternatives to be Studied ReThinkNYC • New York, NY • August,20 2020 Reimagined Penn Station’s Main Hall. Digital Rendering by NOVA Concepts. “The Pennsylvania Station in New York is like some vast basilica of old that towers above the terror of the dark as bulwark and protection to the soul.” Langston Hughes 1. Introduction: ReThinkNYC Requests that ReThinkNYC Proposals be Treated as Alternatives to be Studied 7th Avenue Facade rendering by Jeff Stikeman RethinkNYC submits the following supplemental statement and proposals to their July 20, 2020 preliminary written and verbal submissions which were made in response to the Empire State Development Corps Draft Scope of Work (“DSOW”) and request for Public Comment. RethinkNYC asks that this supplementary submission, which incorporates and adds to the prior submissions(with any changes noted), be read as a unified document. RethinkNYC requests that the proposals submitted today be considered as an “alternative(s) to be studied” as set forth on page 53 of the DSOW. While RethinkNYC’s more specific criticism’s are set forth immediately below, RethinkNYC’s overarching criticism and reason for sponsoring alternatives is that the proposed Empire State Complex fails to sufficiently unlock the potential that a modernized Penn Station and transit network would have on the economy, the region and nation’s ecology, aesthetics, fair housing and accessability to the job market, among many other advantages. While the DSOW acknowledges other infrastructure projects — Gateway, Sunnyside Yards and the Port Authority Bus Terminal — it does not coordinate or harmonize these proposals in a way that maximizes their impacts for the region. -
July 8 Grants Press Release
CITY PARKS FOUNDATION ANNOUNCES 109 GRANTS THROUGH NYC GREEN RELIEF & RECOVERY FUND AND GREEN / ARTS LIVE NYC GRANT APPLICATION NOW OPEN FOR PARK VOLUNTEER GROUPS Funding Awarded For Maintenance and Stewardship of Parks by Nonprofit Organizations and For Free Live Performances in Parks, Plazas, and Gardens Across NYC July 8, 2021 - NEW YORK, NY - City Parks Foundation announced today the selection of 109 grants through two competitive funding opportunities - the NYC Green Relief & Recovery Fund and GREEN / ARTS LIVE NYC. More than ever before, New Yorkers have come to rely on parks and open spaces, the most fundamentally democratic and accessible of public resources. Parks are critical to our city’s recovery and reopening – offering fresh air, recreation, and creativity - and a crucial part of New York’s equitable economic recovery and environmental resilience. These grant programs will help to support artists in hosting free, public performances and programs in parks, plazas, and gardens across NYC, along with the nonprofit organizations that help maintain many of our city’s open spaces. Both grant programs are administered by City Parks Foundation. The NYC Green Relief & Recovery Fund will award nearly $2M via 64 grants to NYC-based small and medium-sized nonprofit organizations. Grants will help to support basic maintenance and operations within heavily-used parks and open spaces during a busy summer and fall with the city’s reopening. Notable projects supported by this fund include the Harlem Youth Gardener Program founded during summer 2020 through a collaboration between Friends of Morningside Park Inc., Friends of St. Nicholas Park, Marcus Garvey Park Alliance, & Jackie Robinson Park Conservancy to engage neighborhood youth ages 14-19 in paid horticulture along with the Bronx River Alliance’s EELS Youth Internship Program and Volunteer Program to invite thousands of Bronxites to participate in stewardship of the parks lining the river banks. -
Report Measures the State of Parks in Brooklyn
P a g e | 1 Table of Contents Introduction Page 2 Methodology Page 2 Park Breakdown Page 5 Multiple/No Community District Jurisdictions Page 5 Brooklyn Community District 1 Page 6 Brooklyn Community District 2 Page 12 Brooklyn Community District 3 Page 18 Brooklyn Community District 4 Page 23 Brooklyn Community District 5 Page 26 Brooklyn Community District 6 Page 30 Brooklyn Community District 7 Page 34 Brooklyn Community District 8 Page 36 Brooklyn Community District 9 Page 38 Brooklyn Community District 10 Page 39 Brooklyn Community District 11 Page 42 Brooklyn Community District 12 Page 43 Brooklyn Community District 13 Page 45 Brooklyn Community District 14 Page 49 Brooklyn Community District 15 Page 50 Brooklyn Community District 16 Page 53 Brooklyn Community District 17 Page 57 Brooklyn Community District 18 Page 59 Assessment Outcomes Page 62 Summary Recommendations Page 63 Appendix 1: Survey Questions Page 64 P a g e | 2 Introduction There are 877 parks in Brooklyn, of varying sizes and amenities. This report measures the state of parks in Brooklyn. There are many different kinds of parks — active, passive, and pocket — and this report focuses on active parks that have a mix of amenities and uses. It is important for Brooklynites to have a pleasant park in their neighborhood to enjoy open space, meet their neighbors, play, and relax. While park equity is integral to creating One Brooklyn — a place where all residents can enjoy outdoor recreation and relaxation — fulfilling the vision of community parks first depends on measuring our current state of parks. This report will be used as a tool to guide my parks capital allocations and recommendations to the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation (NYC Parks), as well as to identify recommendations to improve advocacy for parks at the community and grassroots level in order to improve neighborhoods across the borough. -
DIRECTIONS by SUBWAY: F Train to East Broadway Take Rutgers St./Madison St
DIRECTIONS BY SUBWAY: F Train to East Broadway Take Rutgers St./Madison St. exit from station - Exit Walk east on Rutgers Street towards the water. Turn left on South Street heading north. Once you approach the Dept of Sanitation (on your right), Pier 36 is adjacent on the north side of Sanitation. DIRECTIONS BY CAR: From FDR Drive - Southbound: FDR Drive South to Exit 3, towards South St/Manhattan Bridge. Stay straight to go onto FDR Drive. FDR Drive becomes South Street. Pier 36 is located at the intersection of South Street and Montgomery Street From FDR Drive - Northbound: South Street north (under the FDR highway), past the South Street Seaport (do not go on the FDR Drive). Continue north on South Street (under the Manhattan Bridge, Pathmark on your left), until you see the Department of Sanitation on your right. At the next intersection (South Street and Montgomery Street), turn right at the light for Pier 36. (the entrance for the FDR north will be directly in front of you at the light). From New Jersey Turnpike: Proceed to Exit 14C (Holland Tunnel) Go through the Holland Tunnel and Take EXIT 5 on the left toward Canal St East. Turn slight right onto Laight St...Turn slight right onto Canal St... Turn right onto Bowery. Bowery becomes Chatham Sq. Turn left onto E Broadway...Turn right onto Samuel Dickstein Plz... Turn slight left onto Montgomery St. Turn right onto South St. and end at Pier 36, located at the intersection of South Street and Montgomery Street From the George Washington Bridge: After leaving GW Bridge, take Harlem River Drive exit, Exit 2, towards FDR Drive Proceed onto the Harlem River Drive which connects/merges into FDR Drive S. -
Western Rail Yard
Chapter 10: Neighborhood Character A. INTRODUCTION Neighborhood character is an amalgam of several elements that give an area its distinctive personality and help distinguish it from other neighborhoods. These components include: land use; street layout; scale, type, and style of development; historic features; patterns and volumes of traffic; noise levels; and any other physical or social characteristics. However, not all of these elements affect neighborhood character in all cases; a neighborhood usually draws its character from a few determining elements. Using information presented in other technical chapters of this EIS, this chapter examines neighborhood character at the three project sites and the associated surrounding study areas, and analyzes the effects of the Proposed Actions on neighborhood character in these areas. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS The Proposed Actions would have a beneficial effect on neighborhood character on the project sites and in the surrounding study areas. Development of Western Rail Yard would fulfill a long- standing public policy to promote productive use of the site with a lively mix of uses, open spaces, and streets that would complement and support the development in the Hudson Yards area and West Chelsea. Construction of permanently affordable housing on the Tenth Avenue and Ninth Avenue Sites would support the Clinton neighborhood by emphasizing its residential character and the mixed-income character of its residents. DEVELOPMENT SITE The Proposed Actions would change the character of the Development Site, and this change would be, on balance, decidedly beneficial. The site, which presents a blank wall to the surrounding neighborhood on two sides and transportation/maintenance uses where it can be seen, would be transformed with a mix of residential and commercial uses and open spaces, clearly visible and accessible to the public. -
Daffodil Map 2006
Daffodil Map 2006 Bronx Manhattan 1. St. Mary's Park; St. Ann's Av & 149 St. Brooklyn 1. Riverside Park - 79th to 120 Sts. 2. Crotona Park 1. McGolrick Park 2. DeWitt Park - W 52nd - 54th Sts. 3. Joyce Kilmer Park 2. Brooklyn War Memorial 3. St. Nicholas Park 4. Franz Sigel Park 3. Fulton 4. Union Square Park 5. Echo Park 4. Maria Hernandez 5. Morningside Park 6. Tremont Park 5. Coffey Park 6. Washington Square Park 7. Mosholu Parkway 6. Sunset Park 7. Marcus Garvey Park 8. Williamsbridge Oval 7. Shore Roads/Narrow Botanic Garden 8. East River Park/Corlears Hook 9. Bronx Park 8. Kaiser Park 9. Tompkins Square Park 10. Pelham Parkway 9. Marine Park 10. Verdi Square 11. Highbridge Park Queens 12. Fort Tryon Park Staten Island 1. Forest Park 13. Thomas Jefferson Park 1. Clove Lakes Pk; Victory Blvd pr from ent. to Rink 2. FMCP 2. Clove's Tail 3. Kissena Park 3. Silver Lake Park 4. Highland Park's Children's Garden 4. Richmond Terrace 5. Veterans Square 5. Willowbrook Park 6. Springfield Park 6. Hero Park 7. 111th Street Malls 7. Tompkinsville Park 8. Tribute Park 8. Tappen Park 9. Rainey Park 9. Lt. Leah Playground 10. Socrates Sculpture Park 10. Clove Lakes Pk: 100 Yds Royal Creek Williamsbridge Oval Mosholu Parkway Fort Tryon Park Pelham Pkwy Highbridge Park Bronx Park Echo Park Tremont Park Highbridge Park Crotona Park Joyce Kilmer Park Franz Sigel Park St Nicholas Park St Mary's Park Riverside PMaorkrningside Park Marcus Garvey Park Thomas Jefferson Park Verdi Square De Witt Clinton Park Socrates Sculpture Garden Rainey Park Kissena Park 111th Street Malls Union Square Park Washington Square Park Flushing Meadows Corona Park Tompkins Square Park Monsignor Mcgolrick Park East River Park/Corlears Hook Park Maria Hernandez Park Forest Park Brooklyn War Memorial Fort Greene Park Highland Park Coffey Park Fulton Park Veterans Square Springfield Park Sunset Park Richmond TLetr.ra Nceicholaus Lia Plgd. -
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT to SECTION 14(A) of the SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT of 1934 (AMENDMENT NO
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION (Rule 14a-101) PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (AMENDMENT NO. ) Filed by the Registrant ☑ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐ Check the appropriate box: ☐ Preliminary Proxy Statement ☐ Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) ☐ Definitive Proxy Statement ☑ Definitive Additional Materials ☐ Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 AMC Networks Inc. (Name of registrant as specified in its charter) (Name of person(s) filing proxy statement, if other than the registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): ☑ No fee required. ☐ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: (5) Total fee paid: ☐ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. ☐ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. (1) Amount Previously Paid: (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: (3) Filing Party: (4) Date Filed: *** Exercise Your Right to Vote *** Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on June 6, 2013. -
Mr. Lincoln's Tunnel
PDHonline Course C750 (4 PDH) Mr. Lincoln’s Tunnel Instructor: J.M. Syken 2014 PDH Online | PDH Center 5272 Meadow Estates Drive Fairfax, VA 22030-6658 Phone & Fax: 703-988-0088 www.PDHonline.org www.PDHcenter.com An Approved Continuing Education Provider Mr. Lincoln’s Tunnel 1 Table of Contents Slide/s Part Description 1 N/A Title 2 N/A Table of Contents 3~19 1 Midtown-Hudson Tunnel 20-50 2 Weehawken or Bust 51~89 3 The Road More Traveled 90~128 4 On the Jersey Side 129~162 5 Similar, But Different 163~178 6 Third Tube 179~200 7 Planning for the Future 2 Part 1 Midtown-Hudson Tunnel 3 Namesake 4 In 1912, there were very few good roads in the United States. The relatively few miles of improved road were around towns and cities (a road was “improved” if it was graded). That year, Carl Fisher (developer of Miami Beach and the Indianapolis Speedway, among other things) conceived a trans-continental highway. He called it the “Coast-to-Coast Rock Highway.” It would be finished in time for the 1915 Panama-Pacific Exposition and would run from the exposition’s host city; San Francisco, to New York City. Two auto industry tycoons played major roles in the highway’s development: Frank Seiberling - president of Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., and Henry Joy - president of the Packard Motor Car Company. It was Henry Joy who came up with the idea of naming the highway after POTUS Abraham Lincoln. On July 1st 1913, the Lincoln Highway Association was officially incorporated. -
2018 Annual Report New York State
2018 Annual Report Mitchell-Lama Housing Companies in New York State New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor Based Upon Certified RuthAnne Visnauskas, Commissioner Financial Statements for 2017 Table of Contents Commissioner's Letter .............…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………i Table of Contents ..................................................................................................……………………………………………………………………………iii Glossary ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………iv Summary .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. …Summary DHCR-Supervised Developments Within New York City ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 DHCR-Supervised Developments Outside New York City ………………………………………………………………………………………………….61 HPD -Supervised Developments Within New York City ...................................................................................................................................................... 130 Index by Development Name ............................................................................................................................................................................ Index by Name 1 Index by Development Number …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………Index -
Annual Report 2009
Annual Report 2 0 0 9 Transformation New York City Housing Development Corporation • 110 William Street, New York, NY 10038 • www.nychdc.com 146037_CVR.indd 1 5/20/10 5:48 PM Financial Review 2009 Housing | Communities | Lives Transformation CREDITS Writing: Kirsten Major Design: Bartley & Dick Photography: Larry Racioppo Editor: Catie Marshall Printing: Velocity Print Printed on recycled paper. 146037_CVR.indd 2 5/20/10 5:48 PM If you look at an aerial view of the South Bronx, one thing is immediately apparent; many of the “Ladies and gentlemen, the Bronx is burning.” buildings look new. And they are. At street level, a drive through the Melrose community gives a close up view of new New York City in the 1970s had turned into a place where life was by turns graffiti neighborhoods, built from the ground up, financed by HDC, HPD, and sister agencies backed by investment from major financial strewn, overwhelmed with crime, and for all the charming eccentricities of people and institutions and dreamed up by a cohort of not-for-profit and for-profit developers and community organizations with names like neighborhoods, dangerous and increasingly unlivable. Amid bankruptcy, arson, a failing CPC, Nos Quedamos, Phipps, Procida, WHEDCo, L+M, and BronxPro. education system, falling population and a nationwide trend of the suburbs as the new nexus of American life, the consensus seemed to be not that New York was in trouble, The South Bronx is iconic. In the annals of modern urban planning and Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) upped the ante in terms of but that New York was“over.” community renewal, it is seen as the proverbial phoenix, rising from the literal preservation projects, purchasing a portfolio of projects from HUD, and in a ashes. -
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 9: Architectural Historic Resources ......................................................9-1 A. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................9-1 B. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS ..............................................................................................9-1 C. METHODOLOGY.................................................................................................................9-2 1. OVERVIEW ..........................................................................................................................9-2 2. AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECT (APE) ..................................................................................9-3 3. CRITERIA AND REGULATIONS ............................................................................................9-3 D. EXISTING CONDITIONS ....................................................................................................9-4 1. BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................9-4 2. DESIGNATED AND ELIGIBLE ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES ..............................................9-5 a) Individually Designated, Listed, or Eligible Resources............................................................... 9-9 b) Garment Industry Resources.......................................................................................................9-22 c) Printing Industry Resources........................................................................................................9-32 -
Page Numbers in Bold Refer to the Primary Park Description
INDEX Page numbers in bold refer to the primary park description. Abercrombie & Fitch, 100 Ascoli, Marion Rosenwald, 307 Abercrombie, David T.,100 Atlantic flyway, 34 Aldenwold mansion, 75 AT&T Right-of-Way, 145 Alder Mansion, 242 Audubon Society, see National Audubon Alfred B. DelBello Muscoot Farm, Society see Muscoot Farm Algonquin Trail, 217 Bailey, George, 279 American Stove Works, 331 balanced rocks American Revolution, 7, 33,132, 375 Balancing Rock Trail, 189 Anderson, Henry, 279 St Paul’s Church, 20 Andre Brook Trail, 160, 279, 385 Baldwin, William Delavan, 164 Angle Fly Preserve, 139, 264-271 Baldwin Place Central Section, North County Trailway, 362 Blue Trail, 266 Barger Street Preserve, 397 Blue-Yellow Trail, 267 Bass Trail, 122 White Trail, 267-268 bats, 25 Eastern Section Battle of Merritt Hill, 157 Blue Trail, 269-270 Battle of White Plains, 157 Green Trail, 270 Baur Meadow Trail, 133-135 Orange Trail, 270-271 Baxter Preserve, 26, 180-181, 413 Western Section Bear Mountain Bridge, 192, 193 Blue Trail, 268-269 Bear Mountain State Park, 194 Pink and White Trail, 269 Bear Rock, 232 Red Trail, 269 beaver, 303 Annsville Creek Paddlesport Center, 330, 332 Beaver Dam Sanctuary, 182-183, 401 Annsville Creek Trail, 220-221 Bechtel, Edwin, 257 Annsville Preserve, 330 Bedell, Hope Lewis, 401 Annsville Pavilion, 330 Bedford Anthony’s Nose, 192 Bedford Riding Lanes Association (BRLA), Appalachian Trail, 396 400-401 Aqueduct, The, see Old Croton Aqueduct Leatherman’s Ridge, 12 State Historic Park Bedford Audubon Society, 60, 125, 133, 401 Archville, 384 Bedford Hills Ardsley-on-Hudson Leatherman’s Ridge, 12 Ardsley Waterfront, 339 Bedford Riding Lanes Association (BRLA), Arleo family, 16 182, 311, 400-401 Armonk trails, 155, 325, 323 Betsy Sluder Nature Preserve, 97-98 Bedford Village Eugene and Agnes Meyer Preserve, Arthur Ketchum Sanctuary, 153-155 235-238 Guard Hill Preserve, 401 Haas Sanctuary, 57 Mianus River Gorge Preserve, 140-142 Herbert L.