A Comprehensive Guide to Career Decisions in Engineering
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Findings and Recommendations from an NAE Study
Paper ID #20271 Engineering Technology Education in the United States: Findings and Rec- ommendations from an NAE Study Mr. Greg Pearson, National Academy of Engineering Greg Pearson is a Scholar with the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) in Washington, D.C. Greg currently serves as the responsible staff officer for the NSF-funded project ”The Status, Role, and Needs of Engineering Technology Education in the United States.” He is also study director for the Chevron-funded project, Guiding Implementation of K-12 Engineering in the United States. He was the study director for the NAE and National Research Council project that resulted in the 2014 report, STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research. He was the study director for the project that resulted in publication of Standards for K-12 Engineering Education? (2010) and Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects (2009), an analysis of efforts to teach engineering to U.S. school children. He oversaw the NSF-funded project that resulted in the 2013 publication of Messaging for Engineering: From Research to Action and the 2008 publication of Changing the Conversation: Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering and was co-editor of the reports Tech Tally: Approaches to Assessing Technological Literacy (2006) and Technically Speaking: Why All Americans Need to Know More About Technology (2002). In the late 1990s, Greg oversaw NAE and National Research Council reviews of technology education content standards developed by the International Technology Education Association. Dr. Daniel Peter Kuehn, The Urban Institute Daniel Kuehn is a Research Associate I in the Urban Institute’s Income and Benefits Policy Center and a doctoral student in American University’s Department of Economics. -
Career Information .PDF
ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT CAREER INFORMATION ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING & ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY: From the book: “Engineering Education and Practice in the United States - Engineering Infrastructure Diagramming and Modeling” Prepared by: Panel on Engineering Infrastructure Diagramming and Modeling, Committee on the Education and Utilization of the Engineer, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, National Research Council. Published by National Academy Press; Washington, D.C.; 1986; ISBN: 0-309-03639-9; Pages 74 - 75. Background: In the late 1970’s under the umbrella of what was then the Engineers’ Council for Professional Development (ECPD), now Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), many of the engineering societies participated in a comprehensive review of definitions including that of engineering, the engineer, and the engineering technologist and technician. Their report entitled “The Engineering Team” was approved by the ECPD Board of Directors in 1979, and contained the following definitions and explanatory notes: ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING: Electrical Engineering is the profession in which a knowledge of the mathematical and natural sciences gained by study, experience and practice is applied with judgment to develop ways to utilize, economically, the materials and forces of nature for the benefit of mankind. Electrical Engineer: With a strong background in mathematics, the basic physical sciences, and the engineering sciences, the engineer must be able to interrelate engineering principles with economic, social, legal, aesthetic, environmental and ethical issues, extrapolating beyond the technical domain. The engineer must be a conceptualizer, a designer, a developer, a formulator of new techniques, a producer of standards - all to help meet societal needs. The engineer must plan and predict, systematize and evaluate - must be able to judge systems and components with respect to their relation to health, safety and welfare of people, and to loss of property. -
Judges Handbook Greater Philadelphia Sea Perch 2015 Challenge
2015 Greater Philadelphia SeaPerch Challenge Judges Manual For Official Use Only By Judges. Not for Release or Distribution to Sea Perch Teams Judges Handbook Greater Philadelphia Sea Perch 2015 Challenge 2015 Greater Philadelphia SeaPerch Challenge Judges Manual For Official Use Only By Judges. Not for Release or Distribution to Sea Perch Teams Table of Contents 1. Event Dates and Parking Information 1 2. Schedule of Events 2 3. Arrival and Check In 2 4. What events will I be assigned to judge? 4 5. Awards 4 6. What does a compliance officer do? 5 7. Compliance 5 Compliance Check 1 Design Compliance Check 2 Maneuverability 8. Event Categories Descriptions and Guidelines 6 Vehicle Performance 6 Round 1 Maneuvering the Obstacle Course 8 Round 2 Top Secret Recovery Mission 8 Oral Poster Presentation 9 Team Spirit and Sportsmanship 11 9. Additional Information and Web links 12 ATTACHMENTS ATTACHMENT A‐1 Compliance Check Form ATTACHMENT B‐1 Team Check List ATTACHMENT C‐2 Round 1 Obstacle Course Score Sheet ATTACHMENT D‐1 Round 2 Top Secret Recovery Score Sheet ATTACHMENT E 1‐2 Underwater Mission Illustrations ATTACHMENT F‐DELETED ATTACHMENT G‐1 Parking Sign ATTACHMENT H‐1 Campus Map i Rules and schedules may change. Judges will be notified of any changes on the day of the event. 2015 Greater Philadelphia SeaPerch Challenge Judges Manual For Official Use Only By Judges. Not for Release or Distribution to Sea Perch Teams Welcome and thank you for your willingness to take time form you busy schedule to support the 10th Annual Greater Philadelphia SeaPerch Challenge, (GPSPC). -
A Solution to the Problem of Registration of Engineering Technologists
A Solution to the Problem of Registration of Engineering Technologists Donald W. Yates and J. William Rayjr Louisiana Tech University Abstract The bridge between engineering activity and implementation activity is now filled with a mixture of engineers and technology-oriented assistants. Because This paper advocates the creation of a registered of the trend in engineering education, this activity must engineering technologist. This is based on the fact that be staffed increasingly in the future from sources other engineering technologists are involved in the practice of than the science oriented engineering curricula. engineering as defined by law but do not have the full training required to be registered engineers. Other Into this vacuum moved the four year engineering programs which produce registered paraprofessionals technologist program. are discussed. Support for this is developed in this In 1965, the McCallick Report[4] established the paper. concept of a four year technology degree as opposed to a It is based on two major premises. First, a gap has two year technician degree. The title technologist was to developed between the registered engineer and the be used to distinguish graduates of the four year tradesman/engineering support staff. Next, the gap technology programs from both two year associate degree involves the practice of engineering as typically defined technicians and four year engineering graduates. by Louisiana Statute RS-37-682. This gap needs to be Professional societies struggled with the four year filled with a registered engineering technologist by engineering technology graduate (often referred to as a virtue of the job requirements and the training received batchelor of engineering technology BET or batchelor of by engineering technologists. -
Who Speaks for Engineering Technology the Role of The
Session 2546 Who Speaks for Engineering Technology - The Role of the Engineering Technology Council Walter W. Buchanan, Willard D. Bostwick Middle Tennessee State University/ Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis Abstract The national engineering technology community needs a voice. This article explores the role of the Engineering Technology Council (ETC) of the American Society for Engineering Education (A SEE) in providing a voice for the national engineering technology community. The article gives a brief history of the ETC and looks into what the ETC might do to enhance the position of engineering technology in the engineering spectrum, Introduction In 1970 Winston D. Purvine became the first chair of the Engineering Technology Council. The ETC was created to assess and recommend policies affecting the overall administration of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) accredited technical colleges and schools. The ETC can also be used to provide forums for discussion and an information exchange concerning problems and experiences of technical colleges and institutions, to represent and to speak on behalf of member technical colleges, and to cooperate with other segments of the Society on matters of common interest. 1 Although the ETC and the Engineering Technology Division (ETD) represent and are the voice of the engineering technology community within ASEE, it is generally recognized that the ETC has not become an effective voice for engineering technology the way the Engineering Dean’s Council has become for the engineering community. This is unfortunate since the first guiding principle of the ETC in performing its mission of promoting quality education in engineering technology is to speak collectively for engineering technology institutions.2 ABET Engineering technology has especially lacked an effective voice within the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. -
Appendix J Fish Hearing and Sensitivity to Acoustic
APPENDIX J FISH HEARING AND SENSITIVITY TO ACOUSTIC IMPACTS Fish Hearing and Sensitivity to Acoustic Impacts J-iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ J-1 1.1. What is Injury for Fishes?........................................................................................................ J-1 1.2. Fish........................................................................................................................................... J-1 1.3. Fish Bioacoustics – Overview.................................................................................................. J-2 1.4. Metrics of Sound Exposure...................................................................................................... J-2 2. BACKGROUND ON FISH HEARING........................................................................................... J-3 2.1. Sound in Water ........................................................................................................................ J-3 2.2. Hearing Sensitivity................................................................................................................... J-3 2.3. Other Aspects of Fish Hearing................................................................................................. J-7 3. EFFECTS OF HUMAN-GENERATED SOUND ON FISHES – OVERVIEW ............................. J-8 4. EFFECTS OF ANTHROPOGENIC SOUNDS ON HEARING ..................................................... -
8348 Transportation Engineering Technologist
8348 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIST NATURE OF WORK Serves in a managerial or program expert capacity in either the engineering or construction field/area of highway and bridge construction and maintenance. Manages a unit in a district or division, or may manage a specific division-wide technical function requiring expert level knowledge, or may be licensed land surveyor. As a unit manager, supervises lower level supervisors, technicians and/or professional employees. DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS Engineering Technologist (Level 5) is distinguished from Transportation Engineering Technician - Senior in that incumbents at this level are managers of operational units with significant technical characteristics as opposed to supervisors of specific projects or less technical units/functions, or they are responsible for a special division-wide technical program that requires the highest degree of expertise in that specific technical field. The State Highway Engineer of the Division of Highways will make determinations as to technical characteristics/expertise. In the field of survey, this level is reserved for the licensed land surveyor. ESSENTIAL JOB FUNCTIONS (Any specific position in this class may not include all of the duties listed, nor do the examples listed cover all of the duties which may be assigned.) Provide managerial oversight for subordinate supervisors and the program/projects to which they are assigned. Evaluate the work of subordinate supervisors and employees. Review and/or calculate technical data relating to engineering and construction projects. Review project design and construction plans prepared by consultants. Communicate with consultant engineers to discuss prospective or ongoing projects and plans. Perform field reviews of engineering and construction projects. Meet with various parties having an interest in projects, including representatives of state government, legislators, community leaders, regulators and other interest groups. -
Influence of Spring River Flow on the Recruitment of Japanese Seaperch Lateolabrax Japonicus Into the Chikugo Estuary, Japan
RECENT ADVANCES IN THE STUDY OF SCIENTIA MARINA 70S2 FISH EGGS AND LARVAE October 2006, 159-164, Barcelona (Spain) M.P. Olivar and J.J. Govoni (eds.) ISSN: 0214-8358 Influence of spring river flow on the recruitment of Japanese seaperch Lateolabrax japonicus into the Chikugo estuary, Japan JUN SHOJI 1 and MASARU TANAKA 2 1 Takehara Fisheries Research Station, Hiroshima University, Minato-machi 5-8-1, Takehara, Hiroshima 725-0024, Japan. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Laboratory of Estuarine Ecology, Centre for Education and Research of Field Science, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan. SUMMARY: The estuarine turbidity maximum (ETM) zone is considered to serve as a predation refuge for fish during the early life stages due to the high turbidity and high prey concentration. River flow can be one of the important determinants for survival of early life stages of estuarine dependent fish because it affects both the physical and biological properties of the ETM. We tested the hypothesis that fluctuation of river flow explains the variability in recruitment of Japanese seaperch Lateolabrax japonicus around the ETM region of the Chikugo River estuary, upper Ariake Bay, Japan. Japanese seaperch recruitment showed a 43.3-fold fluctuation from 1990 to 2000 and was inversely correlated with the mean daily river flow of the Chikugo River in March. The recruitment was high and variable in years of low March river flow and was poor in years of high March river flow. We conclude that high river flow potentially decreases Japanese seaperch recruitment in the Chikugo River estuary by blocking the larval migration into the river and by increasing the probability of larval dispersion to the downriver/upper bay areas, where potential predators (jellyfish and Sagitta spp.) were more abundant, and prey (Sinocalanus sinensis) availability and turbidity were lower. -
Fisheries Management Paper No. 280
A REVIEW OF SIZE LIMITS FOR FINFISH IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA Discussion Paper FISHERIES MANAGEMENT PAPER NO. 280 Published by Department of Fisheries 168 St Georges Terrace Perth WA 6000 November 2016 ISSN 0819-4327 A review of size limits for finfish in Western Australia November 2016 Fisheries Management Paper No. 280 ISSN 0819-4327 Illustrations © R. Swainston/anima.net.au ii Fisheries Management Paper 280 Fisheries Management Paper 280 iii CONTENTS 1.0 OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background .............................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Opportunity for comment....................................................................................... 2 2.0 REVIEW OF FINFISH .................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Summary of proposals ............................................................................................ 3 2.2 Size limits for finfish................................................................................................ 4 3.0 APPENDIX 1 ................................................................................................................... 61 3.1 Method of determining the length of a fish ........................................................ -
Civil Engineering Technology Program
Civil Engineering SCIENCE AND Technology Program TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW OF THE PROGRAM: The Civil Engineering Technology program at Fairmont State University prepares graduates to participate in the planning, analysis, design, construction, operation and maintenance of roadways, airports, tunnels, bridges, water supply and distribution systems and waste collection and treatment systems. The curriculum is a highly flexible 2 + 2 curriculum. Once the two-year degree is earned, graduates may choose to enter the workforce or continue their education with two years at the baccalaureate level. The Associate of Science degree in Civil Engineering Technology provides technical courses in the fundamentals of engineering technology, surveying, construction materials and methods, computer graphics, civil engineering graphics, construction estimating, structures, and environmental engineering technology. Most of the technical courses provide a combination of lecture and laboratory experiences. In addition, technical courses are underpinned with instruction in mathematics and science, written and oral communication skills, which are utilized subsequently in the technical courses. The Bachelor of Science degree provides students a greater emphasis on analysis and design with specialized classes in hydraulics and hydrology, soil mechanics and foundation design, structural analysis and design, water and wastewater systems, and construction management, coupled with additional classes in science and mathematics, and attributes in Fine Arts, Health & well being, -
Engineering Technician Engineering Technologist Engineer
Engineering Technician Engineering Technologist Engineer 3 Paths To Designing & Destroying For Fun & Profit Presented by: Dunte Hector B.S. Mechanical Engineering © 2020 Dunte Hector Who Am I? Dunte Hector B.S. Mechanical Engineering Texas Tech University, 2011 Design Engineer, Stages Cycling I’ve researched, designed, manufactured, operated, and serviced bikes, workout equipment, computer chip equipment, and heat exchangers with the help of software tools, metalwork, 3D printing, and lots of teammates. © 2020 Dunte Hector Exploring The Engineering Field 1. Who’s It For? 2. Who Does What? 3. What’s The Day Like? 4. Certificates, Licenses, and Degrees 5. More Fun Stuff © 2020 Dunte Hector The Engineering Field... Who’s It For? © 2020 Dunte Hector Do You Have Fun... ...solving puzzles? ...taking things apart? ...building new stuff? ...finding a “better way”? ...checking the details? © 2020 Dunte Hector The Engineering Field... Who Does What? © 2020 Dunte Hector Engineering Technician Job Duties (big company) Job Duties (small company) ● operate equipment ● everything from “big company” ● collect data ● draft models ● generate reports ● prepare production drawings ● service equipment ● review technical specifications ● document processes ● set up tests ● product inspections ● assemble fixtures ● quality control ● assemble tools ● troubleshoot products © 2020 Dunte Hector Engineering Technologist Job Duties (big company) Job Duties (small company) ● establish equipment SOPs ● everything from “big company” ● manage tests ● prepare & review drawings -
Manufacturing Engineering Technologist
- ~ Chippewa Valley ~lTechnical cvtc.edu Co l ege MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIST Mission Statement The Manufacturing Engineering Technologist program delivers an innovative and applied education that supports the workforce needs of the region’s employers. They will assist engineering and management in the design and development of new products and production processes staying abreast of changing technology through lifelong learning. Manufacturing Engineering Technologist Program Objectives • Graduates will be well versed and skilled in current manufacturing processes, team based problem solving methods, root cause analysis, manufacturing standards, and current practices. • Graduates will assist the quality engineer in quality control methods such as statistical process control, lean manufacturing techniques, and designed experiments. • Graduates will assist the Quality Engineer in design for product manufacturability, assembly, and shipping. • Graduates will assist in cost estimating of products and manufacturing. • Graduates will experience a safe, quality, clean, hands-on labs, instructors with industry experience, and curriculum designed to help them progress in their careers. Manufacturing Engineering Technology Student Learning Objectives Students will demonstrate: • ability to apply statistical quality control, root cause analysis, and team based problem solving to solve well-defined manufacturing problems; • an ability to design solutions for well-defined technical problems and assist with the engineering design of systems,