Cornell Notes Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

The Holocaust Nazi leaders planned the destruction of the Jews and anyone they considered Uundesirablendesirable - This included the weak, the outspoken, the "racially impure" This included the weak, the outspoken, the "racially impure" Hitler wanted a master race of able bodied Germans - called Aryans 1935 - Nuremberg Laws Laws excluded German Jews from Reich citizenship Prohibited them from marrying or having relations with persons of "German or related blood." Other Policies - Jews with German names had to change to Jewish names, Jewish passports had a red “J” stamped on it, Jews had to wear a yellow Star of David with Jude on it 1938 – Kristallnacht - Troops attack Jewish businesses, homes and synagogues and kill about 100 people Resettlement As Hitler took over East Europe – millions of Slavs removed from their homes – placed in labor camps and their land was given to German settlers This was overseen by the Schutzstaffel - SS Final Solution Hitler's plan to rid Europe of the Jews – This is genocide To carry this out - Germans set up einsatzgruppens They were to kill all of the Jews At first - they placed the Jews in ghettos where they were starved Then they were sent to concentration camps - like Buchenwald and Dachau Here youHere were you kept were until kept you until dropped you d roppeddead dead Death Squads - follow the army into conquered areas – kill the Jews - bury them in mass graves Death Camps - Jews in captured countries were sent there to be executed Auschwitz in Poland was the largest Killed all Jews - then burned their remains in crematoriums Once there - they had their ID number tattooed in their skin - according to Jewish law - this is a sin Reaction Some Jews actually escaped to other countries - but many people there didn't help them because they were afraid of the Germans 11 million people die during the Holocaust - 6 million were Jews War Crimes After the war - Nazi leaders were put on trial for their war crimes in Nuremberg November 1945-October 1946 24 people were put on trial 19 were found guilty - 12 of which were executed .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

From Complaisance to Collaboration: Analyzing Citizensâ•Ž Motives Near
James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Proceedings of the Tenth Annual MadRush MAD-RUSH Undergraduate Research Conference Conference: Best Papers, Spring 2019 From Complaisance to Collaboration: Analyzing Citizens’ Motives Near Concentration and Extermination Camps During the Holocaust Jordan Green Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/madrush Part of the European History Commons, and the Holocaust and Genocide Studies Commons Green, Jordan, "From Complaisance to Collaboration: Analyzing Citizens’ Motives Near Concentration and Extermination Camps During the Holocaust" (2019). MAD-RUSH Undergraduate Research Conference. 1. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/madrush/2019/holocaust/1 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conference Proceedings at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in MAD-RUSH Undergraduate Research Conference by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. From Complaisance to Collaboration: Analyzing Citizens’ Motives Near Concentration and Extermination Camps During the Holocaust Jordan Green History 395 James Madison University Spring 2018 Dr. Michael J. Galgano The Holocaust has raised difficult questions since its end in April 1945 including how could such an atrocity happen and how could ordinary people carry out a policy of extermination against a whole race? To answer these puzzling questions, most historians look inside the Nazi Party to discern the Holocaust’s inner-workings: official decrees and memos against the Jews and other untermenschen1, the role of the SS, and the organization and brutality within concentration and extermination camps. However, a vital question about the Holocaust is missing when examining these criteria: who was watching? Through research, the local inhabitants’ knowledge of a nearby concentration camp, extermination camp or mass shooting site and its purpose was evident and widespread.
[Show full text]
Using Diaries to Understand the Final Solution in Poland
Miranda Walston Witnessing Extermination: Using Diaries to Understand the Final Solution in Poland Honours Thesis By: Miranda Walston Supervisor: Dr. Lauren Rossi 1 Miranda Walston Introduction The Holocaust spanned multiple years and states, occurring in both German-occupied countries and those of their collaborators. But in no one state were the actions of the Holocaust felt more intensely than in Poland. It was in Poland that the Nazis constructed and ran their four death camps– Treblinka, Sobibor, Chelmno, and Belzec – and created combination camps that both concentrated people for labour, and exterminated them – Auschwitz and Majdanek.1 Chelmno was the first of the death camps, established in 1941, while Treblinka, Sobibor, and Belzec were created during Operation Reinhard in 1942.2 In Poland, the Nazis concentrated many of the Jews from countries they had conquered during the war. As the major killing centers of the “Final Solution” were located within Poland, when did people in Poland become aware of the level of death and destruction perpetrated by the Nazi regime? While scholars have attributed dates to the “Final Solution,” predominantly starting in 1942, when did the people of Poland notice the shift in the treatment of Jews from relocation towards physical elimination using gas chambers? Or did they remain unaware of such events? To answer these questions, I have researched the writings of various people who were in Poland at the time of the “Final Solution.” I am specifically addressing the information found in diaries and memoirs. Given language barriers, this thesis will focus only on diaries and memoirs that were written in English or later translated and published in English.3 This thesis addresses twenty diaries and memoirs from people who were living in Poland at the time of the “Final Solution.” Most of these diaries (fifteen of twenty) were written by members of the intelligentsia.
[Show full text]
“And Then They Came for Me...”
“AND THEN THEY CAME FOR ME...” (Image: The National WWII Museum, 2014.057.036_1.) Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party’s rise to power in Germany ushered in an era of attacks against people Hitler deemed undesirable. Jews living across Europe became the primary target of Nazi hatred and violence. Attacks against other groups of people—such as individuals with mental or physical disabilities, political prisoners, Romani, Soviet citizens and prisoners of war, lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people, Slavs, and Jehovah’s Witnesses—also became a part of the Nazi program to “purify” German society. Those who did not fit within Nazi standards of a “master race” faced capture and horrific brutality in the attempted genocide now known as the Holocaust. From 1939 to 1941, the Nazis steadily took steps toward a formal policy of extermination. Known as the Final Solution, this policy spread to each region that fell under Nazi rule throughout World War II. Anti-Semitism had been present throughout Europe for centuries, peaking during times of upheaval, such as the Crusades or outbreaks of plague. This historical precedent perpetuated hateful stereotypes that again resurfaced in the era of upheaval that followed Germany’s defeat in World War I. While anti-Semitism had been limited to fringe political groups, the rising popularity of the Nazi Party helped promote ideas of segregating and removing the Jewish population from the region. While not all Germans actively supported the anti-Semitic attacks taken by the Nazis, many adopted an attitude of indifference toward the treatment of their Jewish neighbors.
[Show full text]
Unit I Spiral Exam – World War II (75 Points Total) PLEASE DO NO
Mr. Huesken 10th Grade United States History II Unit I Spiral Exam – World War II (75 points total) PLEASE DO NO WRITE ON THIS TEST DIRECTIONS – Please answer the following multiple-choice questions with the best possible answer. No answer will be used more than once. (45 questions @ 1 point each = 45 points) 1) All of the following were leaders of totalitarian governments in the 1930’s and 1940’s except: a. Joseph Stalin b. Francisco Franco. c. Benito Mussolini d. Neville Chamberlain. 2) In what country was the Fascist party and government formed? a. Italy b. Japan c. Spain d. Germany 3) The Battle of Britain forced Germany to do what to their war plans in Europe in 1942? a. Join the Axis powers. b. Fight a three-front war. c. Put off the invasion of Britain. d. Enter into a nonaggression pact with Britain. 4) The Nazis practiced genocide toward Jews, Gypsies, and other “undesirable” peoples in Europe. What does the term “genocide” mean? a. Acting out of anti-Semitic beliefs. b. Deliberate extermination of a specific group of people. c. Terrorizing of the citizens of a nation by a government. d. Killing of people for the express purpose of creating terror. 5) The term “blitzkrieg” was a military strategy that depended on what? a. A system of fortifications. b. Out-waiting the opponent. c. Surprise and quick, overwhelming force. d. The ability to make a long, steady advance. 6) In an effort to avoid a second “world war”, when did the Britain and France adopt a policy of appeasement toward Germany? a.
[Show full text]
How Much Did the Germans Know About the Final Solution?: an Examination of Propaganda in the Third Reich
Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Honors Theses Lee Honors College Spring 2010 How Much Did the Germans Know about the Final Solution?: An Examination of Propaganda in the Third Reich Issa A. Braman Western Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/honors_theses Part of the Holocaust and Genocide Studies Commons Recommended Citation Braman, Issa A., "How Much Did the Germans Know about the Final Solution?: An Examination of Propaganda in the Third Reich" (2010). Honors Theses. 3371. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/honors_theses/3371 This Honors Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Lee Honors College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. How Much Did the Germans Know about the Final Solution?: An Examination of Propaganda in the Third Reich by Melissa A. Braman In 1925, while Adolf Hitler was serving a short sentence in jail for his failed Beer Hall Putsch, he wrote in Mein Kampf, “With the year 1915 enemy propaganda began in our country, after 1916 it became more and more intensive till finally, at the beginning of the year 1918, it swelled to a positive flood.” Hitler, a soldier of World War I, had experienced firsthand the power of propaganda during the war. With the failure of Germany to counter-act the Allied propaganda, Hitler noted, “The army gradually learned to think as the enemy wanted it to.”1 Hitler applied this same concept to promoting the rhetoric of the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (NSDAP).
[Show full text]
The “Final Solution”
THE “FINAL SOLUTION” Introduction Although the Nazis came to power in 1933, it wasn’t until the second half of 1941 that Nazi policy began to focus on the annihilation of the Jewish people. This evolution in policy coincided with Germany’s invasion of the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941. Nazi leaders saw the invasion of the Soviet Union not only as a bid to gain territory that they felt was vital for Germany, but as an ideological struggle. The brutality of the invasion coalesced with racial antisemitism to further radicalize anti-Jewish polices since Jews were seen as the racial and ideological archenemy— especially the stereotype that Jews were the creators and primary agents of Bolshevism. Historians note that on July 31, 1941, Hermann Goering, Hitler’s second in command, sent an official order to Reinhard Heydrich, the head of the security branch of the SS, to authorize a “Final Solution of the Jewish Question.” The exact meaning behind this order is still debated among many Holocaust scholars. Current research shows that mass systematic killing of Jewish men in the newly conquered territory of the Soviet Union began in June, and by August included women and children as well. There is no surviving order by Hitler to expand the murderous activities to encompass all Jews under Nazi control, but most scholars believe such an order was given in the autumn of 1941, or at the latest early in 1942. Even if the exact sequence of events regarding the order is unknown, L5 the fact remains that mass murder continued swiftly, and soon spread to Poland and other European countries.
[Show full text]
Extermination Camps
Extermination Camps (in German, vernichtungslager), Nazi camps located in occupied Poland with the sole purpose of murder of Jews. Altogether, some 3.5 million Jews perished in extermination camps as part of the “Final Solution.” The Nazis began the systematic mass murder Jews with the invasion of the Soviet Union in June 1941. At first, hundreds of thousands of Jews were shot by Einsatzgruppen and other units. However, this method quickly proved inefficient enough by Nazi standards, and they began searching for other murder methods. Experiments with poison gas began shortly thereafter at Auschwitz and other camps. After observing the efficacy of poison gas as means of mass murder, Nazi leaders ordered the establishment of extermination camps, where gas would be used for the murder of Jews. The extermination camps were constructed in the region of Poland occupied by Germany in 1939. They included the Birkenau (Auschwitz II) section of Auschwitz, Chelmno, Belzec, Sobibor, and Treblinka. Some experts also include Majdanek, with its 360,000 victims (see entry). Chelmno was the first extermination camp to be established. Located near Lodz, it was put into operation on December 8, 1941, and ceased operation in the summer of 1944. Victims were murdered by gas vans; some 320,000 people were murdered there. Auschwitz was both a concentration camp and an extermination camp. Its extermination section in Birkenau was instituted in March 1942, and finally closed in November 1944. During its two and a half years of operation, about one million Jews were murdered in the camp's gas chambers, which used Zyklon B gas.
[Show full text]
Nazi Germany and the Jews, 1933-1945
NAZI GERMANY AND THE JEWS, 1933–1945 ABRIDGED EDITION SAUL FRIEDLÄNDER Abridged by Orna Kenan To Una CONTENTS Foreword v Acknowledgments xiii Maps xv PART ONE : PERSECUTION (January 1933–August 1939) 1. Into the Third Reich: January 1933– December 1933 3 2. The Spirit of the Laws: January 1934– February 1936 32 3. Ideology and Card Index: March 1936– March 1938 61 4. Radicalization: March 1938–November 1938 87 5. A Broken Remnant: November 1938– September 1939 111 PART TWO : TERROR (September 1939–December 1941) 6. Poland Under German Rule: September 1939– April 1940 143 7. A New European Order: May 1940– December 1940 171 iv CONTENTS 8. A Tightening Noose: December 1940–June 1941 200 9. The Eastern Onslaught: June 1941– September 1941 229 10. The “Final Solution”: September 1941– December 1941 259 PART THREE : SHOAH (January 1942–May 1945) 11. Total Extermination: January 1942–June 1942 287 12. Total Extermination: July 1942–March 1943 316 13. Total Extermination: March 1943–October 1943 345 14. Total Extermination: Fall 1943–Spring 1944 374 15. The End: March 1944–May 1945 395 Notes 423 Selected Bibliography 449 Index 457 About the Author About the Abridger Other Books by Saul Friedlander Credits Cover Copyright About the Publisher FOREWORD his abridged edition of Saul Friedländer’s two volume his- Ttory of Nazi Germany and the Jews is not meant to replace the original. Ideally it should encourage its readers to turn to the full-ﬂedged version with its wealth of details and interpre- tive nuances, which of necessity could not be rendered here.
[Show full text]
Heydrich, Reinhard
Heydrich, Reinhard (1904--1942), Nazi SS leader who was a key player in the planning and execution of the “Final Solution”. Heydrich served as head of the Nazi Security Police (SIPO), the Security Service (SD), and the Reich Security Main Office (Reichssicherheitshauptamt, RSHA). Heydrich was born in Halle, Germany to a family of musicians. He had a strict upbringing that included near-worship of state authority. He joined the German navy, but was dishonorably discharged in 1931 after being found guilty of misconduct with a female friend. That same year Heydrich became head of the Security Service (SD), the SS's espionage and intelligence organization (originally, he had viewed the SS with disdain, but relented after meeting Heinrich Himmler). At that point of his life, Heydrich gave himself over both to his new superiors and to his dark side: he was cruel, cynical, pitiless— and ambitious. This dangerous combination, along with his Aryan looks, allowed Heydrich to thrive in the Nazi hierarchy. As chief of the SD, Heydrich reigned over the blackmail and information- getting that helped Himmler gain control over the Gestapo, the German secret police. In 1936 Heydrich himself became executive director of the Gestapo, while retaining control of the SD. These two posts gave him unlimited power to send "enemies of the Reich" such as Jews to concentration camps. He also pitted his two agencies against each other in a race to see who could better carry out Hitler’s anti-Jewish policies. By 1938 Heydrich began calling for the "forced emigration" of Jews as a solution to the "Jewish question." He was one of the main planners of the Kristallnacht pogrom of November 9--10, 1938, and presided over the arrests of thousands of Jews.
[Show full text]
The Chamberlain Papers
Testaments to the Holocaust SERIES ONE: Archives of The Wiener Library, London General Editor: Ben Barkow Author of “Alfred Wiener and the Making of the Holocaust Library” Primary Source Media Woodbridge, CT : Reading, England 1998 TESTAMENTS TO THE HOLOCAUST Series One: Archives of The Wiener Library, London First Published in 1998 by Primary Source Media Copyright © Primary Source Media and The Wiener Library, London ISBN: 0753649608 Filmed by Primary Source Media, Reading All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Primary Source Media and The Wiener Library, London. PRIMARY SOURCE MEDIA PRIMARY SOURCE MEDIA 50 Milford Road 12 Lunar Drive Reading Woodbridge Berkshire RG1 8LJ Connecticut 06525 England USA PUBLISHER'S FOREWORD Primary Source Media is proud to present Testaments to the Holocaust. This microfilm edition contains materials from The Wiener Library, London. Primary Source Media has published a large selection of the Library’s holdings, which have been grouped in sections under the headings ‘Propaganda Materials’, ‘Eyewitness Accounts’, ‘Wiener Library Publications’ and ‘Photographs’. The microfilm collection is accompanied by a comprehensive index. Available in digital as well as in hardback paper, this index will open the contents of The Wiener Library archives to closer inspection than has hitherto been possible, making rare and unique historical material available to a wider public. Taken together, the materials assembled here provide the basis for studying Nazi Germany and its crimes against the Jews from any number of perspectives.
[Show full text]
Female Perpetrators of the Nazi Final Solution
Trinity College Trinity College Digital Repository Senior Theses and Projects Student Scholarship Spring 2015 Ordinary Women: Female Perpetrators of the Nazi Final Solution Haley A. Wodenshek Trinity College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses Part of the European History Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Wodenshek, Haley A., "Ordinary Women: Female Perpetrators of the Nazi Final Solution". Senior Theses, Trinity College, Hartford, CT 2015. Trinity College Digital Repository, https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses/522 Ordinary Women: Female Perpetrators of the Nazi Final Solution Haley Wodenshek History Department Senior Thesis Advisor: Allison Rodriguez Class of 2015 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements……………..………………………………………………………... 1 “We believe in Adolf Hitler, our Eternal Führer”………………………………………... 2 An Introduction to the Role of Nazi Women Chapter 1: “Power would tame [Hitler’s] extremism, they said”………………………. 22 The Rise and Fall of the Weimar Republic Chapter 2: Hitler’s Girls………………………………………………………………… 43 Chapter 3: Hitler’s Girls Go East……………………………………………………….. 67 Chapter 4: The Case Studies of Herta Oberheuser, Irma Grese & Ilse Koch…………... 85 The Case of Herta Oberheuser ............................................................................. 87 The Case of Irma Ilse Ida Grese, #9 ………………………………………....... 108 The Case of Ilse Koch ........................................................................................ 127 Conclusion: Fleeing the East, The Final Retreat ……………………………………... 149 “My [sic] wife, sir, wouldn’t hurt a fly.” Works Cited…………………………………………………………………………… 158 3 Acknowledgements *** This work is dedicated to my mother Anne Wodenshek, who has always pushed me to become the strong and independent woman I am today, and who gave me the gift of education. *** I would like to extend my deepest gratitude to my Thesis advisor, Professor Allison Rodriguez for helping me through this yearlong process.
[Show full text]
Final Thesis.Pdf
Canterbury Christ Church University’s repository of research outputs http://create.canterbury.ac.uk Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. Stracey, H. (2017) ‘Enfer des femmes’: Britain and the Ravensbrück-Hamburg Trials. M.A. thesis, Canterbury Christ Church University. Contact: [email protected] ‘Enfer Des Femmes’: Britain and The Ravensbrück-Hamburg Trials By Heather Stracey Canterbury Christ Church University Thesis submitted For Masters by Research September 2017 1 Table of Contents: Abstract page 4 Acknowledgements 7 Abbreviations 8 Prologue: Impressions of Ravensbrück 10 Introduction: Ravensbrück and War Crimes in Historical Perspective 14 Chapter 1: When ‘Conceptions of Justice Do Not Always Tally With Our Own’: 24 Human Rights and Bipolar Politics Prior to the First Ravensbrück-Hamburg Trials Chapter 2: The Seven Ravensbrück-Hamburg Trials 36 i. The First Ravensbrück-Hamburg Trial ii. The Second Ravensbrück-Hamburg Trial iii. The ‘Uckermark Trial’ iv. The ‘Doctors and Nurses Case’ v. The Fifth Ravensbrück-Hamburg Trial vi. The Sixth Ravensbrück-Hamburg Trial vii.
[Show full text]