Highland Second Sight
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
River Oykel Special Area of Conservation (Sac)
RIVER OYKEL SPECIAL AREA OF CONSERVATION (SAC) CONSERVATION ADVICE PACKAGE Image: © Lyn Wells, NatureScot Site Details Site name: River Oykel Site map: https://sitelink.nature.scot/site/8363 Location: Highlands and Islands Site code: UK0030261 Area (ha): 921.46 Date designated: 17 March 2005 Qualifying features Qualifying feature SCM assessed condition SCM visit UK overall on this site date Conservation Status Freshwater pearl mussel Unfavourable - No change 8 April 2015 Unfavourable – (Margaritifera bad margaritifera) [S1029] Atlantic salmon (Salmo Favourable – Recovered 7 July 2011 Unfavourable- salar) [S1106] Inadequate Notes: Assessed condition refers to the condition of the SAC feature assessed at a site level as part of NatureScot’s Site Condition Monitoring (SCM) programme. Conservation status is the overall condition of the feature throughout its range within the UK as reported to the European Commission under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive in 2019. Overlapping and linked Protected Areas The River Oykel SAC includes main stem of the River Oykel, which rises within Ben More Assynt Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) https://sitelink.nature.scot/site/191 The river flows through Loch Ailsh, which is part of Inverpolly, Loch Urigill and nearby Lochs Special Protection Area (SPA) https://sitelink.nature.scot/site/8516 and Loch Awe and Loch Ailsh SSSI https://sitelink.nature.scot/site/1710. It also flows through Oykel Gorge SSSI https://sitelink.nature.scot/site/1264 Kyle of Sutherland Marshes SSSI https://sitelink.nature.scot/site/885 The River Oykel SAC also includes two principle tributaries of the River Oykel: the River Cassley which rises within a different part of Ben More Assynt SSSI https://sitelink.nature.scot/site/191 the River Einig which rises within Beinn Dearg SAC https://sitelink.nature.scot/site/8198 and Beinn Dearg SSSI https://sitelink.nature.scot/site/165 The seaward end of the River Oykel SAC meets the Dornoch Firth and Morrich More SAC https://sitelink.nature.scot/site/8242 at Bonar Bridge. -
Approach to the EIA
KINTRADWELL WIND FARM EIA Scoping Report August 2019 Quality Management Version 1 Version 2 Version 3 Version 4 Date 14/08/19 Prepared by Roy Ferguson Signature Checked by Paul Darnbrough Signature Authorised by Roy Ferguson Signature Project number GLA_1663 Renewable Energy Systems Ltd. Third Floor STV Pacific Quay Glasgow G51 1PQ Contact: [email protected] ITPEnergised 60 Elliot Street Glasgow G3 8DZ Registration Number: SC450178 Contact: [email protected] © Copyright 2019. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Energised Environments Limited. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Energised Environments Limited constitutes an infringement of copyright. ITPEnergised is a trading name for the legal entity Energised Environments Limited. Limitation: This report has been prepared solely for the use of the Client and any party with whom a warranty agreement has been executed, or an assignment has been agreed. No other parties may rely on the contents of this report without written approval from Energised Environments Limited, for which a charge may be applicable. Energised Environments Limited accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequences of use of this document for any purpose other than that for which it was commissioned, nor the use of this document by any third party with whom an agreement has not been executed. Project number: GLA_1663 i ITPENERGISED Dated: 15/08/2019 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Environmental -
A96 Corridor Wastewater Development Option Study
A96 Corridor Wastewater Development Option Study 12/01/2007 A96 CORRIDOR WASTEWATER DEVELOPMENT OPTION STUDY Contract 9559 - A96 Corridor Option Study CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 5 2.0 OPTION DEVELOPMENT AND STRATEGY...................................................................... 10 3.0 BASELINE DATA...................................................................................................................... 12 4.0 RISK ............................................................................................................................................ 13 5.0 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS SEPA...................................................................... 16 6.0 INVERNESS EAST AREA........................................................................................................ 18 6.1 OPTION 1 TRANSFER FLOWS TO ALLANFEARN WWTW ......................................................... 18 6.2 OPTION 2 TRANSFER FLOWS TO A NEW WORKS IN CENTRAL AREA....................................... 25 7.0 NAIRN AREA............................................................................................................................. 31 7.1 OPTION 1 REDEVELOP EXISTING WASTEWATER TREATMENT WORKS................................... 31 7.2 OPTION 2 TRANSFER FLOWS TO NEW WORKS IN CENTRAL AREA.......................................... 38 7.3 OPTION 3 TRANSFER FLOWS TO A NEW WORKS WITH NEW SEA OUTFALL ........................... -
Caithness County Council
Caithness County Council RECORDS’ IDENTITY STATEMENT Reference number: CC Alternative reference number: Title: Caithness County Council Dates of creation: 1720-1975 Level of description: Fonds Extent: 10 bays of shelving Format: Mainly paper RECORDS’ CONTEXT Name of creators: Caithness County Council Administrative history: 1889-1930 County Councils were established under the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1889. They assumed the powers of the Commissioners of Supply, and of Parochial Boards, excluding those in Burghs, under the Public Health Acts. The County Councils also assumed the powers of the County Road Trusts, and as a consequence were obliged to appoint County Road Boards. Powers of the former Police Committees of the Commissioners were transferred to Standing Joint Committees, composed of County Councillors, Commissioners and the Sheriff of the county. They acted as the police committee of the counties - the executive bodies for the administration of police. The Act thus entrusted to the new County Councils most existing local government functions outwith the burghs except the poor law, education, mental health and licensing. Each county was divided into districts administered by a District Committee of County Councillors. Funded directly by the County Councils, the District Committees were responsible for roads, housing, water supply and public health. Nucleus: The Nuclear and Caithness Archive 1 Provision was also made for the creation of Special Districts to be responsible for the provision of services including water supply, drainage, lighting and scavenging. 1930-1975 The Local Government Act (Scotland) 1929 abolished the District Committees and Parish Councils and transferred their powers and duties to the County Councils and District Councils (see CC/6). -
Rod Kinnermony Bends
Document: Form 113 Issue: 1 Record of Determination Related to: All Contracts Page No. 1 of 64 A9 Kessock Bridge 5 year Maintenance Programme Record of Determination Name Organisation Signature Date Redacted Redacted 08/03/2018 Prepared By BEAR Scotland 08/08/2018 Redacted 03/09/2018 Checked By Jacobs Redacted 10/09/2018 Client: Transport Scotland Distribution Organisation Contact Copies BEAR Scotland Redacted 2 Transport Scotland Redacted 1 BEAR Scotland Limited experience that delivers Transport Scotland Trunk Road and Bus Operations Document: EC DIRECTIVE 97/11 (as amended) ROADS (SCOTLAND) ACT 1984 (as amended) RECORD OF DETERMINATION Name of Project: Location: A9 Kessock Bridge 5 year Maintenance A9 Kessock Bridge, Inverness Programme Marine Licence Application Structures: A9 Kessock Bridge Description of Project: BEAR Scotland are applying for a marine licence to cover a 5-year programme of maintenance works on the A9 Kessock Bridge, Inverness. The maintenance activities are broken down into ‘scheme’ and ‘cyclic maintenance’. ‘Scheme’ represents those works that will be required over the next 5 years, whilst ‘cyclic maintenance’ represents those works which may be required over the same timeframe. Inspections will also be carried out to identify the degree of maintenance activity required. Following review of detailed bathymetric data obtained in August 2018, BEAR Scotland now anticipate that scour repairs at Kessock Bridge are unlikely to be required within the next 5 five years; hence, this activity is considered cyclic maintenance. The activities encompass the following: Schemes • Fender replacement; • Superstructure painting and • Cable stay painting. Cyclic maintenance • Scour repairs; • Drainage cleaning; • Bird guano removal; • Structural bolt and weld renewal; • Mass damper re-tuning; • Pendel bearing inspection; • Cleaning and pressure washing superstructure • Cable stay re-tensioning; • Minor bridge maintenance. -
Catalogue Description and Inventory
= CATALOGUE DESCRIPTION AND INVENTORY Adv.MSS.30.5.22-3 Hutton Drawings National Library of Scotland Manuscripts Division George IV Bridge Edinburgh EH1 1EW Tel: 0131-466 2812 Fax: 0131-466 2811 E-mail: [email protected] © 2003 Trustees of the National Library of Scotland = Adv.MSS.30.5.22-23 HUTTON DRAWINGS. A collection consisting of sketches and drawings by Lieut.-General G.H. Hutton, supplemented by a large number of finished drawings (some in colour), a few maps, and some architectural plans and elevations, professionally drawn for him by others, or done as favours by some of his correspondents, together with a number of separately acquired prints, and engraved views cut out from contemporary printed books. The collection, which was previously bound in two large volumes, was subsequently dismounted and the items individually attached to sheets of thick cartridge paper. They are arranged by county in alphabetical order (of the old manner), followed by Orkney and Shetland, and more or less alphabetically within each county. Most of the items depict, whether in whole or in part, medieval churches and other ecclesiastical buildings, but a minority depict castles or other secular dwellings. Most are dated between 1781 and 1792 and between 1811 and 1820, with a few of earlier or later date which Hutton acquired from other sources, and a somewhat larger minority dated 1796, 1801-2, 1805 and 1807. Many, especially the engravings, are undated. For Hutton’s notebooks and sketchbooks, see Adv.MSS.30.5.1-21, 24-26 and 28. For his correspondence and associated papers, see Adv.MSS.29.4.2(i)-(xiii). -
Caithness and Sutherland Proposed Local Development Plan Committee Version November, 2015
Caithness and Sutherland Proposed Local Development Plan Committee Version November, 2015 Proposed CaSPlan The Highland Council Foreword Foreword Foreword to be added after PDI committee meeting The Highland Council Proposed CaSPlan About this Proposed Plan About this Proposed Plan The Caithness and Sutherland Local Development Plan (CaSPlan) is the second of three new area local development plans that, along with the Highland-wide Local Development Plan (HwLDP) and Supplementary Guidance, will form the Highland Council’s Development Plan that guides future development in Highland. The Plan covers the area shown on the Strategy Map on page 3). CaSPlan focuses on where development should and should not occur in the Caithness and Sutherland area over the next 10-20 years. Along the north coast the Pilot Marine Spatial Plan for the Pentland Firth and Orkney Waters will also influence what happens in the area. This Proposed Plan is the third stage in the plan preparation process. It has been approved by the Council as its settled view on where and how growth should be delivered in Caithness and Sutherland. However, it is a consultation document which means you can tell us what you think about it. It will be of particular interest to people who live, work or invest in the Caithness and Sutherland area. In preparing this Proposed Plan, the Highland Council have held various consultations. These included the development of a North Highland Onshore Vision to support growth of the marine renewables sector, Charrettes in Wick and Thurso to prepare whole-town visions and a Call for Sites and Ideas, all followed by a Main Issues Report and Additional Sites and Issues consultation. -
The Arms of the Scottish Bishoprics
UC-NRLF B 2 7=13 fi57 BERKELEY LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORN'A \o Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2008 with funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/armsofscottishbiOOIyonrich /be R K E L E Y LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORN'A h THE ARMS OF THE SCOTTISH BISHOPRICS. THE ARMS OF THE SCOTTISH BISHOPRICS BY Rev. W. T. LYON. M.A.. F.S.A. (Scot] WITH A FOREWORD BY The Most Revd. W. J. F. ROBBERDS, D.D.. Bishop of Brechin, and Primus of the Episcopal Church in Scotland. ILLUSTRATED BY A. C. CROLL MURRAY. Selkirk : The Scottish Chronicle" Offices. 1917. Co — V. PREFACE. The following chapters appeared in the pages of " The Scottish Chronicle " in 1915 and 1916, and it is owing to the courtesy of the Proprietor and Editor that they are now republished in book form. Their original publication in the pages of a Church newspaper will explain something of the lines on which the book is fashioned. The articles were written to explain and to describe the origin and de\elopment of the Armorial Bearings of the ancient Dioceses of Scotland. These Coats of arms are, and have been more or less con- tinuously, used by the Scottish Episcopal Church since they came into use in the middle of the 17th century, though whether the disestablished Church has a right to their use or not is a vexed question. Fox-Davies holds that the Church of Ireland and the Episcopal Chuich in Scotland lost their diocesan Coats of Arms on disestablishment, and that the Welsh Church will suffer the same loss when the Disestablishment Act comes into operation ( Public Arms). -
Pentland Firth and Orkney Waters Wave and Tidal Stream
Pentland Firth and Orkney Waters Enabling Actions Report PFOW wave and tidal stream projects and migratory salmonids July 2013 PFOW wave and tidal stream projects and migratory salmonids 2 PFOW wave and tidal stream projects and migratory salmonids © Crown Copyright 2013 Published by The Crown Estate. This report is available on The Crown Estate website at: www.thecrownestate.co.uk Dissemination Statement This publication (excluding the logos) may be re-used free of charge in any format or medium. It may only be re-used accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as The Crown Estate copyright and use of it must give the title of the source publication. Where third party copyright material has been identified, further use of that material requires permission from the copyright holders concerned. Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this report are entirely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of The Crown Estate, and The Crown Estate is not liable for the accuracy of the information provided or responsible for any use of the content. The contents of this Report are offered in good faith and after due consideration. The authors as individuals or as Epsilon Resource Management , cannot be held responsible for any consequences arising from the use of this Report. Opinions expressed in this Report are those of the author and consultees. Acknowledgments The project Sponsor is The Crown Estate. Epsilon Resource Management would like to thank the following for their guidance and invaluable contributions to this project: Toby Gethin, The Crown Estate The project Review Group All delegates at the workshop Bibliographic Policy The Client has agreed that references in this document may be cited as web links as appropriate. -
Place-Names of Inverness and Surrounding Area Ainmean-Àite Ann an Sgìre Prìomh Bhaile Na Gàidhealtachd
Place-Names of Inverness and Surrounding Area Ainmean-àite ann an sgìre prìomh bhaile na Gàidhealtachd Roddy Maclean Place-Names of Inverness and Surrounding Area Ainmean-àite ann an sgìre prìomh bhaile na Gàidhealtachd Roddy Maclean Author: Roddy Maclean Photography: all images ©Roddy Maclean except cover photo ©Lorne Gill/NatureScot; p3 & p4 ©Somhairle MacDonald; p21 ©Calum Maclean. Maps: all maps reproduced with the permission of the National Library of Scotland https://maps.nls.uk/ except back cover and inside back cover © Ashworth Maps and Interpretation Ltd 2021. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2021. Design and Layout: Big Apple Graphics Ltd. Print: J Thomson Colour Printers Ltd. © Roddy Maclean 2021. All rights reserved Gu Aonghas Seumas Moireasdan, le gràdh is gean The place-names highlighted in this book can be viewed on an interactive online map - https://tinyurl.com/ybp6fjco Many thanks to Audrey and Tom Daines for creating it. This book is free but we encourage you to give a donation to the conservation charity Trees for Life towards the development of Gaelic interpretation at their new Dundreggan Rewilding Centre. Please visit the JustGiving page: www.justgiving.com/trees-for-life ISBN 978-1-78391-957-4 Published by NatureScot www.nature.scot Tel: 01738 444177 Cover photograph: The mouth of the River Ness – which [email protected] gives the city its name – as seen from the air. Beyond are www.nature.scot Muirtown Basin, Craig Phadrig and the lands of the Aird. Central Inverness from the air, looking towards the Beauly Firth. Above the Ness Islands, looking south down the Great Glen. -
Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual
Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual www.scottishpowerrenewables.com Clauchrie Windfarm December, 2019 Environmental Impact Assessment Report Table of contents 6.4.5.2 Visualisations 18 6.5 Baseline Conditions 18 6.5.1 Introduction 18 6.1 Introduction 6 6.5.2 Landscape Baseline - Overview 18 6.1.1 Background 6 6.5.2.1 Site Context 18 6.1.2 The proposed Development 6 6.5.2.2 Landscape Character 18 6.1.3 Study Area 6 6.5.2.3 Landscape Designations 19 6.5.2.4 Merrick Wild Land Area (WLA) 19 6.2 Legislation, Policy and Guidelines 7 6.5.3 Visual Baseline Overview 19 6.2.1 Legislation 7 6.5.3.1 Blade Tip ZTV 19 6.2.2 Policy 7 6.5.3.2 Blade Tip ZTV with Potential Forestry Screening 20 6.2.2.1 European Landscape Convention (ELC) 7 6.5.3.3 Hub Height ZTV 20 6.2.2.2 National Planning Framework 3 (NPF3) 7 6.5.3.4 Horizontal Angle ZTV 20 6.2.2.3 National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) 7 6.5.3.5 Overview of Principal Visual Receptors 20 6.2.2.4 Scottish Planning Policy (SPP) 7 6.5.3.5.1 Settlement 20 6.2.2.5 SNH Spatial Planning for Onshore Wind Turbines 7 6.5.3.5.2 Roads 21 6.2.2.5.1 National Scenic Areas 7 6.5.3.5.3 Rail Routes 21 6.2.2.5.2 Gardens and Designed Landscapes 8 6.5.3.5.4 Ferry Routes 21 6.2.2.5.3 Wild Land 8 6.5.3.5.5 Recreational Routes 21 6.2.2.6 South Ayrshire Local Development Plan Policy 8 6.5.3.5.5.1 Southern Upland Way (SUW) 21 6.2.2.6.1 LDP Policy: Landscape Quality 8 6.5.3.5.5.2 Other Long-Distance Footpaths 21 6.2.2.6.2 LDP Policy: Protecting the Landscape 8 6.5.3.5.5.3 Local Paths Network 21 6.2.2.6.3 LDP Policy: Dark Skies 8 6.5.3.5.5.4 -
Discussion on Palaeoecology and Sedimentology Across a Jurassic Fault Scarp, NE Scotland
Journal of the Geological Society, London, Vol. 151, 1994, pp. 729-731, 1 fig. Printed in Northern Ireland Discussion on palaeoecology and sedimentology across a Jurassic fault scarp, NE Scotland Journal, Vol. 150, 193, pp. 323-340 J. R. Underhill writes: Intheir recent paper, Wignall & additional aspect of the recognition of this important Pickering (1993) provide an excellent analysis of the structural feature which can be matched with Allt na Cuile sedimentological and palaeontological aspects of the Upper Sandstone deposition, regardless of whether a relay ramp or Jurassic exposures on the East Sutherland coast. Their work transfer fault zone interpretation is preferred, is thatthe clears up many outstanding problems relating to the area spatial relations between it and the Allt na Cuile outcrop and deserves wide recognition. However, there are a few pattern rules out signifcantstrike-slip motions on the minor points relating to the structural aspects of their study Helmsdale fault after theJurassic (Thomson & Underhill or to offshore correlations which may warrant qualification 1993; Underhill 1993). The only evidencefor limited or further clarification. post-depositional strike-slip iswell illustrated by the folds described by Wignall & Pickering (fig.17), which have been (1) Controls on Allt na Cuile Sandstone sediment interpreted to be the result of minor sinistral movement dkpersal. Wignall & Pickering contend that supply of the (Thomson & Underhill 1993). Allt na Cuile Sandstone during the early Kimmeridgian was via a transfer fault zone between two separate segments of the Helmsdale fault. Although an offset in the trace of the (2) True sign$cance of the cemented microfault planes in the Helmsdalefault is supported by onshore mapping, little Allt na Cuile Sandstone.