Chikungunya Virus
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Why Aedes Aegypti?
Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 98(6), 2018, pp. 1563–1565 doi:10.4269/ajtmh.17-0866 Copyright © 2018 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene Perspective Piece Mosquito-Borne Human Viral Diseases: Why Aedes aegypti? Jeffrey R. Powell* Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut Abstract. Although numerous viruses are transmitted by mosquitoes, four have caused the most human suffering over the centuries and continuing today. These are the viruses causing yellow fever, dengue, chikungunya, and Zika fevers. Africa is clearly the ancestral home of yellow fever, chikungunya, and Zika viruses and likely the dengue virus. Several species of mosquitoes, primarily in the genus Aedes, have been transmitting these viruses and their direct ancestors among African primates for millennia allowing for coadaptation among viruses, mosquitoes, and primates. One African primate (humans) and one African Aedes mosquito (Aedes aegypti) have escaped Africa and spread around the world. Thus it is not surprising that this native African mosquito is the most efficient vector of these native African viruses to this native African primate. This makes it likely that when the next disease-causing virus comes out of Africa, Ae. aegypti will be the major vector to humans. Mosquito-borne viruses (arboviruses) have been afflicting The timeline for the spread of Ae. aegypti is reasonably clear humans for millennia and continue to cause immeasurable and is consistent with epidemiologic records. Beginning in the suffering. While not the only mosquito-borne viruses, the fol- sixteenth century, European ships to the New World stopped lowing four have been the most widespread and notorious in in West Africa to pick up native Africans for the slave trade8 terms of severity of diseases and number of humans affected: and very likely picked up Ae. -
Data-Driven Identification of Potential Zika Virus Vectors Michelle V Evans1,2*, Tad a Dallas1,3, Barbara a Han4, Courtney C Murdock1,2,5,6,7,8, John M Drake1,2,8
RESEARCH ARTICLE Data-driven identification of potential Zika virus vectors Michelle V Evans1,2*, Tad A Dallas1,3, Barbara A Han4, Courtney C Murdock1,2,5,6,7,8, John M Drake1,2,8 1Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 2Center for the Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 3Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California-Davis, Davis, United States; 4Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, United States; 5Department of Infectious Disease, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 6Center for Tropical Emerging Global Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 7Center for Vaccines and Immunology, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 8River Basin Center, University of Georgia, Athens, United States Abstract Zika is an emerging virus whose rapid spread is of great public health concern. Knowledge about transmission remains incomplete, especially concerning potential transmission in geographic areas in which it has not yet been introduced. To identify unknown vectors of Zika, we developed a data-driven model linking vector species and the Zika virus via vector-virus trait combinations that confer a propensity toward associations in an ecological network connecting flaviviruses and their mosquito vectors. Our model predicts that thirty-five species may be able to transmit the virus, seven of which are found in the continental United States, including Culex quinquefasciatus and Cx. pipiens. We suggest that empirical studies prioritize these species to confirm predictions of vector competence, enabling the correct identification of populations at risk for transmission within the United States. *For correspondence: mvevans@ DOI: 10.7554/eLife.22053.001 uga.edu Competing interests: The authors declare that no competing interests exist. -
An Overview of Mosquito Vectors of Zika Virus
Microbes and Infection xxx (2018) 1e15 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Microbes and Infection journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/micinf An overview of mosquito vectors of Zika virus Sebastien Boyer a, Elodie Calvez b, Thais Chouin-Carneiro c, Diawo Diallo d, * Anna-Bella Failloux e, a Institut Pasteur of Cambodia, Unit of Medical Entomology, Phnom Penh, Cambodia b Institut Pasteur of New Caledonia, URE Dengue and Other Arboviruses, Noumea, New Caledonia c Instituto Oswaldo Cruz e Fiocruz, Laboratorio de Transmissores de Hematozoarios, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil d Institut Pasteur of Dakar, Unit of Medical Entomology, Dakar, Senegal e Institut Pasteur, URE Arboviruses and Insect Vectors, Paris, France article info abstract Article history: The mosquito-borne arbovirus Zika virus (ZIKV, Flavivirus, Flaviviridae), has caused an outbreak Received 6 December 2017 impressive by its magnitude and rapid spread. First detected in Uganda in Africa in 1947, from where it Accepted 15 January 2018 spread to Asia in the 1960s, it emerged in 2007 on the Yap Island in Micronesia and hit most islands in Available online xxx the Pacific region in 2013. Subsequently, ZIKV was detected in the Caribbean, and Central and South America in 2015, and reached North America in 2016. Although ZIKV infections are in general asymp- Keywords: tomatic or causing mild self-limiting illness, severe symptoms have been described including neuro- Arbovirus logical disorders and microcephaly in newborns. To face such an alarming health situation, WHO has Mosquito vectors Aedes aegypti declared Zika as an emerging global health threat. This review summarizes the literature on the main fi Vector competence vectors of ZIKV (sylvatic and urban) across all the ve continents with special focus on vector compe- tence studies. -
<Imagen: Delphi Developers Journal Logo>
DATOS PERSONALES Apellido y Nombres: Diaz, Luis Adrián DNI: 24630504 Domicilio Laboral: Laboratorio de Arbovirus - Instituto de Virología - Facultad de Ciencias Médicas - Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Córdoba, Argentina. Correo electrónico: [email protected], [email protected] Teléfono laboral: 0351-4334022 Título/s de grado obtenidos: BIÓLOGO. FCEFyN – UNC. Promedio general con y sin aplazos: 8,64. Título/s de Post-Grado obtenidos: DOCTOR en Ciencias Biológicas. FCEFyN. Cargo docente actual: Profesor Adjunto. Dedicación simple. CONCURSADO. Instituto de Virología “Dr. J. M. Vanella”, Facultad Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Cargo/s en investigación: Investigador Asistente. Carrera Investigador Científico CONICET. Dedicación Exclusiva. Fecha de ingreso: Septiembre de 2010 Subsidios obtenidos como responsable en los últimos 5 (cinco) años: Virus transmitidos por artrópodos (Arbovirus) de importancia sanitaria en Argentina: estudios ecoepidemiológicos. Código proyecto: 30720130100631CB. Res. SECYT 203/14, Res. Rec UNC: 1565/14. SECYT-UNC. 2014-2016. Evaluación de infección por flavivirus y ricketsias en aves y garrapatas de importancia sanitaria. Cooperación internacional CONICET-FAPESP. Director. 2014-2016. Interacciones ecológicas e inmunológicas entre los virus St. Louis encephalitis y West Nile de importancia médica y veterinaria en Argentina. DIRECTOR. PICT 627/2010. Subsidio otorgado por Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología de la Nación, Programa FONCyT. Lugar de trabajo: Instituto de Virología “Dr. J. M. Vanella”. Período: 2012-2014. Interacciones ecológicas e inmunológicas entre los virus St. Louis encephalitis y West Nile de importancia médica y veterinaria en Argentina. DIRECTOR. Fundación Bunge y Born. Lugar de trabajo: Instituto de Virología “Dr. J. M. Vanella”. Período: 2011-2013. Vigilancia epidemiológica de Flavivirus (Arbovirus) y sus posibles vectores y hospedadores asociados en la ciudad de Córdoba. -
SY10.01 Epidemiology of Arthritogenic Arboviruses Affecting
6/24/2019 National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases The Story of Mosquito‐Borne Viruses that Cause Joint Pain Epidemiology of Arthritogenic Arboviruses among Travelers Affecting Travelers Susan Hills MBBS, MTH Medical Epidemiologist Division of Vector‐Borne Diseases Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 16th Conference of the International Society of Travel Medicine June 8, 2019 12 What: Alphaviruses Symptoms of alphaviral diseases Sindbis virus 34 Why is clinician awareness of these diseases important? Potential for rapid spread . Disease burden – Common: Chikungunya –Less common: Ross River, Mayaro, O’nyong‐nyong, Sindbis . Geographically widely distributed Robinson MC. Trans Roy Soc Trop Med Hyg 1955 56 1 6/24/2019 Travelers can be sentinels of infection Traveler’s role in spread of infection Lindh E. Open Forum ID 2018 Tsuboi 2016. Emerging Infectious Diseases 78 Chikungunya 910 Chikungunya Transmission cycle Sylvatic cycle . First recognized during Aedes furcifer, Aedes africanus outbreak in Tanzania in 1952–53 . ‘that which bends up’ or Chimpanzees, monkeys, Chimpanzees, ‘to become contorted’ baboons monkeys, baboons (Makonde language) Aedes furcifer, Aedes africanus Source: PAHO, 2011. Preparedness and Response for Chikungunya Virus Introduction in the Americas Available at www..paho.org Acknowledgement for graphic: Dr Ann Powers, CDC 11 12 2 6/24/2019 Transmission cycle Mosquito vectors Sylvatic cycle Urban cycle Aedes aegypti Aedes furcifer, Aedes africanus Aedes albopictus Chimpanzees, monkeys, Chimpanzees, baboons monkeys, baboons Aedes aegypti Aedes albopictus . Identified by white stripes on bodies and legs Aedes aegypti Aedes furcifer, Aedes africanus Aedes albopictus . Aggressive daytime biters with peak dawn and dusk . -
The Zika Virus Species of Aedes Mosquito, Aedes Furcifer 109 (19.46
Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences Volume 10, Number 1, 2018 ISSN: 2277-0062 POTENTIAL ZIKA VIRUS VECTORS OF KAUGAMA LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA, JIGAWA STATE, NIGERIA Ahmed, U.A. Department of Biological Science, Sule Lamido University, Kafin Hausa, Jigawa State, Nigeria Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT The Zika virus strain responsible for the outbreak in Brazil has been detected in Africa for the first time. This information will help African countries to re-evaluate their level of risk and adopt increase their levels of preparedness. These should include the study of potential vectors responsible for the disease. Identification of potential Zika virus vectors in Kaugama revealed the presence of five species of Aedes mosquito, Aedes furcifer 109 (19.46%), A. aegypti 92 (16.43%), A. africanus 132 (23.57%), A. albopictus 112 (20.00%) and A. taylori 115 (20.54%). Aedes africanus was the most abundant species encountered. Analysis of species abundance showed no significant difference (p>0.05). The abundance of the vectors was suggested to be due to large number of breeding places in the study area and probably improper mosquito control. Detection of Zika virus from the collected vectors is of great importance, serological detection of specific antibodies against Zika virus from the inhabitants is valuable tool to prove them as vectors and it is good to eradicate the potential vectors from the area. Keywords: Kaugama, Potential, Species, Vectors, Zika virus INTRODUCTION Zika virus is an emerging mosquito-borne virus that was first identified in Uganda in 1947 in rhesus monkeys. Its name 58 Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences Volume 10, Number1, 2018 comes from Zika forest of Uganda. -
Pan American Health Organization PAHO/ACMR 14/2 Original: English
Pan American Health Organization PAHO/ACMR 14/2 Original: English FOURTEENTH MEETING OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON MEDICAL RESEARCH Washington, D.C. 7-10 July 1975 ECOLOGY OF ARBOVIRUSES AND THEIR DISEASES IN FRENCH GUIANA The issue of this document does not constitute formal publication. It should not be reviewed, abstracted, or quoted without the consent of the Pan American Health Organization. The authors alone are responsible for statements expressed in signed papers. ECOLOGY OF ARBOVIRUSES AND THEIR DISEASES IN FRENCH GUIANA Approaching the study of the Arbovirus in French Guiana we tried to make manifest the ecological foci, where by the only fact of the presence at the same time of virus reservoirs and of a population of vectors particularly abondant we had some chance of isolating some arbovirus which can cause a disease to man. In order to identify these ecological foci we had to do a certain number of serological investigation trying to use man as a revelator of this arbovirus circu- lation. The serological investigation were executed first by using a series of antigen chosen because they have been isolated before in French Guiana - for the A group, Mucambo and Pixuna virus. - for the B group, Yellow fever virus, St-Louis, Dengue II and Dengue III. After the isolation of two virus : one, seeming new, belonging to the Venezuelan Encephalitis group, the other belonging to group B and recognized as similar to Ilheus, we have also included them in the series of antigens. Military coming from different territories and in particular from Martinica and Guadaloupe seemed to us to be excellent sentinel. -
Mayaro: an Emerging Viral Threat?
Emerging Microbes & Infections ISSN: (Print) 2222-1751 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/temi20 Mayaro: an emerging viral threat? Yeny Acosta-Ampudia, Diana M. Monsalve, Yhojan Rodríguez, Yovana Pacheco, Juan-Manuel Anaya & Carolina Ramírez-Santana To cite this article: Yeny Acosta-Ampudia, Diana M. Monsalve, Yhojan Rodríguez, Yovana Pacheco, Juan-Manuel Anaya & Carolina Ramírez-Santana (2018) Mayaro: an emerging viral threat?, Emerging Microbes & Infections, 7:1, 1-11, DOI: 10.1038/s41426-018-0163-5 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41426-018-0163-5 © The Author(s) 2018 Published online: 26 Sep 2018. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 1317 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 31 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=temi20 Acosta-Ampudia et al. Emerging Microbes & Infections (2018) 7:163 Emerging Microbes & Infections DOI 10.1038/s41426-018-0163-5 www.nature.com/emi REVIEW ARTICLE Open Access Mayaro: an emerging viral threat? Yeny Acosta-Ampudia1, Diana M. Monsalve1, Yhojan Rodríguez1, Yovana Pacheco 1,Juan-ManuelAnaya1 and Carolina Ramírez-Santana1 Abstract Mayaro virus (MAYV), an enveloped RNA virus, belongs to the Togaviridae family and Alphavirus genus. This arthropod- borne virus (Arbovirus) is similar to Chikungunya (CHIKV), Dengue (DENV), and Zika virus (ZIKV). The term “ChikDenMaZika syndrome” has been coined for clinically suspected arboviruses, which have arisen as a consequence of the high viral burden, viral co-infection, and co-circulation in South America. In most cases, MAYV disease is nonspecific, mild, and self-limited. -
A Mosquito Psorophora Ferox (Humboldt 1819) (Insecta: Diptera: Culicidae)1 Chris Holderman and C
EENY632 A Mosquito Psorophora ferox (Humboldt 1819) (Insecta: Diptera: Culicidae)1 Chris Holderman and C. Roxanne Connelly2 Introduction Janthinosoma sayi Theobald (1907) Psorophora ferox, (Figures 1 and 2) known unofficially Janthinosoma jamaicensis Theobald (1907) as the white-footed woods mosquito (King et al. 1942), is a mosquito species native to most of North and South Aedes pazosi Pazos (1908) America. It is a multivoltine species, having multiple generations each year. The mosquito is typical of woodland Janthinosoma centrale Brethes (1910) environments with pools that intermittently fill with rain or flood water. Several viruses have been isolated from the Compiled by WRBU (2013b) mosquito, but it is generally not thought to play a major role in pathogen transmission to humans. However, the mosquito is known to frequently and voraciously bite people. Synonymy Culex posticatus Wiedemann (1821) Culex musicus Say (1829) Janthinosoma echinata Grabham (1906) Janthinosoma sayi Dyar and Knab (1906) Janthinosoma terminalis Coquillett (1906) Janthinosoma vanhalli Dyar and Knab (1906) Figure 1. Adult female Psorophora ferox (Humboldt), a mosquito (lateral view). Janthinosoma coquillettii Theobald (1907) Credits: Chris Holderman, UF/IFAS 1. This document is EENY632, one of a series of the Department of Entomology and Nematology, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date August 2015. Reviewed September 2018. Visit the EDIS website at https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu for the currently supported version of this publication. This document is also available on the Featured Creatures website at http://entomology.ifas.ufl.edu/creatures. 2. Christopher J. Holderman, graduate student; and C. Roxanne Connelly, associate professor, Department of Entomology and Nematology; UF/IFAS Extension, Gainesville, FL 32611. -
Chikungunya Virus
CHIKUNGUNYA VIRUS The mission of the Swine Health Information Center is to protect and enhance the health of the United States swine herd through coordinated global disease monitoring, targeted research investments that minimize the impact of future disease threats, and analysis of swine health data. July 2016 | Updated April 2021 SUMMARY IMPORTANCE . Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is a mosquito-borne virus that mainly affects humans. Historically, most outbreaks have occurred in Africa and Asia. However, CHIKV now causes sporadic epidemics in other regions including Europe and the Americas. Although natural infection in swine has not been documented, antibodies to CHIKV have been detected in pigs. PUBLIC HEALTH . CHIKV most often causes fever, myalgia, and polyarthralgia in humans. A maculopapular pruritic rash can also be seen, along with ocular signs and involvement of the gastrointestinal system. Most people infected with CHIKV develop symptomatic illness, but death is rare. INFECTION IN SWINE . Natural CHIKV infection has not been documented in swine. There is evidence that pigs can mount an antibody response to CHIKV; however, in many cases, co- infection with other alphaviruses was documented. TREATMENT . There are no alphavirus-specific antiviral drugs. CLEANING AND DISINFECTION . Alphaviruses are not stable in the environment. In general, togaviruses are destroyed by detergents, acids, alcohols (70% ethanol), aldehydes (formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde), beta-propiolactone, halogens (sodium hypochlorite and iodophors), phenols, quaternary ammonium compounds, and lipid solvents. PREVENTION AND CONTROL . Prevention in humans involves vector control and insect repellent use. There are no specific prevention and control measures for CHIKV in swine. TRANSMISSION . Like other arboviruses, CHIKV is maintained in a transmission cycle between mosquitoes and vertebrate hosts. -
Overview of Chikungunya Epidemiology Diana P
Overview of chikungunya epidemiology Diana P. Rojas Department of Biostatistics University of Florida November 29, 2018 Key features of transmission • Chikungunya has been identified in over 60 countries in Asia, Africa, Europe and the Americas. • Transmission mostly by Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus • Other mosquitoes in Africa can act as efficient vectors for chikungunya: Aedes dalzieli, Aedes furcifer, Aedes taylori, Aedes africanus, and Aedes luteocephalus. • Incubation period: 4-7 days (2-12 days). • Infectious period humans: 7 days • Extrinsic latent period: mean of 7 days (2 -9 days). • Life expectancy of the mosquitos: 30 days. Serial interval CHIKV Mosquito Mosquito feeds/acquires virus refeeds/transmits virus Extrinsic LP Intrinsic IP 7 days 3-5 days (3-12 days) Viremia Viremia Up to 7 d 0 5 8 15 18 23 Illness Illness IP: 4-7 days Human #1 Human #2 22% asymptomatic infection CHIKV Transmission cycle Weaver SC (2014) Arrival of Chikungunya Virus in the New World: Prospects for Spread and Impact on Public Health. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 8(6): e2921. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002921 Factors associated with CHIKV transmission • Environmental/ecological conditions • Abundance of mosquito egg laying habitats • Completely naïve populations • Alternate vector(s), new ecological niches involved • Viral genetics / mutations • Attack rates may be explained by: • Surveillance practices • Season of CHIKV introduction into a country or a region • Vector density and activity; • Vector control measures; and lifestyle differences Key features of transmission Indicator Asia and La Reunion Americas R0 3.0-4.2 2-4 Attack Rate % 16.55 – 55.6 % 41% % Asymptomatic infections 3-22% 10-58.3% Overall seroprevalence 38.2 – 75% 13-90% CFR <1% <1% At risk groups Newborns, >55 and >45 and comorbidities comorbidities Persisting CHIKV disease 48.7% 45% Re-emergence of Chikungunya 2004-2015 Weaver SC (2014) Arrival of Chikungunya Virus in the New World: Prospects for Spread and Impact on Public Health. -
Blood Feeding Insect Series: Yellow Fever1 Walter J
ENY-732 Blood Feeding Insect Series: Yellow Fever1 Walter J. Tabachnick, C. Roxanne Connelly, and Chelsea T. Smartt2 History of Yellow Fever 17,500 cases with 1,700 deaths in Upper Volta in 1983; and Cameroon had 20,000 cases with 1,000 deaths in 1990. Yellow fever is among the most feared of human diseases. For 1988–2007, the World Health Organization (WHO) It was one of the most devastating and important diseases reported 26,356 yellow fever cases. in Africa and the Americas in the 17–20th centuries with periodic outbreaks of yellow fever that involved thousands of human cases. New Orleans experienced the last major What is Yellow Fever? yellow fever epidemic in the United States in 1905 with The Disease about 4000 human cases and 500 deaths. Yellow fever is particularly feared due to the disturbing nature of its symptoms. Symptoms may range from clini- Yellow fever virus is transmitted to humans through the cally inapparent to fatal. In some regions of Latin America bite of infected mosquitoes. Epidemics of yellow fever as much as 90% of the population have been infected with during the past 300 years show why this disease inspired the yellow fever virus but show no clinical symptoms. dread and fear. The numbers of deaths during outbreaks are startling: 6,000 dead in Barbados in 1647; 3,500 deaths After being bitten by an infected mosquito, the incubation in Philadelphia in 1793; 1,500 in New York City in 1798; period in infected humans is generally 3–6 days. The onset 29,000 deaths in Haiti in 1802; and 20,000 deaths in over of the disease is very sudden and devastating to the patient.