Hampshire Local Transport Plan
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Executive Board Meeting 10Am, Friday 23Rd March 2012
Executive Board Meeting 10am, Friday 23 rd March 2012 Nottingham City Council AGENDA 1. Apologies 2. Declarations of Interest 3. Minutes of the Executive Board Meeting 16 TH December 2011 4. Financial Report 2011-12 5. EMC Priorities – Business Plan 2012-13 6. EMC Budget 2012-13 7. EMC Membership 2012/13 (Verbal Report) 8. Welfare Reform 9. Transport Investment a) Midland Main Line Upgrade & Electrification b) Local Transport Bodies Consultation 10. Regional Growth Fund and BIS Update (Verbal Report) 11. Affordable Housing Provision 12. Judicial Review and DEFRA Consultation on the Waste (England and Wales) Regulations 2011 13. Board Reports a) East Midlands Improvement & Efficiency Partnership b) Strategic Migration Board c) Regional Employers Board 14. Report of the EMC Management Group (discussion to be chaired by Cllr Jon Collins) Item 3 EAST MIDLANDS COUNCILS EXECUTIVE BOARD MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON 16 TH DECEMBER 2011 AT LEICESTERSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL Present: Cllr David Parsons CBE (Chair) – Leicestershire County Council Cllr Jon Collins (Vice-Chair) – Nottingham City Council Cllr Neil Clarke (Vice Chair) – Rushcliffe Borough Council Cllr Ernie White – Blaby District Council Cllr Chris Millar – Daventry District Council Cllr Andrew Lewer – Derbyshire County Council Cllr Lewis Rose OBE – Derbyshire Dales District Council Cllr Martin Hill OBE – Lincolnshire County Council Cllr Kay Cutts – Nottinghamshire County Council Cllr Roger Begy OBE – Rutland County Council Cllr Linda Neal – South Kesteven District Council Cllr Robert -
Pale Lane Farm, Pale Lane Fleet Hampshire
Kieron Gregson Our ref: APP/N1730/W/18/3204011 Carter Jonas Your ref: 16/03129/OUT 1 Chapel Place LONDON W1G 0BG 4 November 2019 Dear Sir TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – SECTION 78 APPEAL MADE BY WATES DEVELOPMENTS PALE LANE FARM, PALE LANE, FLEET, HAMPSHIRE, RG27 8BA APPLICATION REF: 16/03129/OUT 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of Nick Fagan BSc (Hons) DipTP MRTPI, who held a public local inquiry between 8-16 January 2019 into your appeal against the decision of Hart District Council to refuse your client’s application for outline planning permission for the development of up to 700 residential dwellings, site for primary school and local centre, together with associated vehicular, pedestrian and cycle access, drainage, landscape works and provision of general open space. Full details for the provision of Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace and means of access, in accordance with application ref: 16/03129/OUT dated 17 November 2016. 2. On 14 June 2018, this appeal was recovered for the Secretary of State's determination, in pursuance of section 79 of, and paragraph 3 of Schedule 6 to, the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision 3. The Inspector recommended that the appeal be dismissed. 4. For the reasons given below, the Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s conclusions, except where stated, and agrees with his recommendation. He has decided to dismiss the appeal. A copy of the Inspector’s report (IR) is enclosed. -
Worcestershire Local Transport Board Framework
Worcestershire Local Transport Board Assurance Framework February 2013 Find out more online: www.worcestershire.gov.uk/transport www.wlep.org.uk Worcestershire Local Transport Body Assurance Framework 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 2. Purpose, Structure and Operating Principles 2 2.1 Name 2 2.2 Geography 2 2.3 Membership 2 2.4 Status and Role of Accountable Body 3 2.5 Conflicts of Interest 4 2.6 Gifts and Hospitality 4 2.7 Audit and Scrutiny 5 2.8 Strategic Objectives and Purpose 5 2.9 Support and Administration Arrangements 5 2.10 Working Arrangements and Meeting Frequency 6 2.11 Transparency and Local Engagement 6 2.12 Complaints and Whistle Blowing 6 3. Prioritisation of Schemes 7 3.1 Introduction 7 3.2 Prioritisation Process 7 3.3 Scheme Eligibility 8 4. Programme Management and Investment Decisions 10 4.1 Scheme Assessment and Approval 10 4.2 Programme Entry 10 4.3 Conditional Approval 10 4.4 Full Approval 10 4.5 The Transport Business Case 11 4.6 Strategic Case 11 4.7 Economic Case 11 4.8 Financial Case 11 4.9 Commercial Case 11 4.10 Management Case 12 4.11 Value for Money 12 4.12 External Views on Business Cases 12 4.13 Release of Funding, Cost Control and Approval Conditions 13 Appendix A -Articles of Constitution, Financial Regulations, Guide to Worcestershire County Council Constitution, Members' Code of Conduct, Procedural Standing Orders Appendix B - LTP3 Policy List, The Worcestershire SAF Summary, Worcestershire County Council Scheme Appraisal Framework: User Guide 1. Introduction 1.1 Background 1.1.1 The Department for Transport has announced its intention to devolve funding for local major transport schemes to Local Transport Bodies (LTBs) from 2015. -
Transport for the North a Blueprint for Devolving and Integrating Transport Powers in England
REPORT TRANSPORT FOR THE NORTH A BLUEPRINT FOR DEVOLVING AND INTEGRATING TRANSPORT POWERS IN ENGLAND Ed Cox and Luke Raikes March 2015 © IPPR North 2015 Institute for Public Policy Research ABOUT IPPR NORTH IPPR North is IPPR’s dedicated thinktank for the North of England. supported by With its head office in Manchester and representatives in Newcastle, IPPR North’s research, together with our stimulating and varied events programme, seeks to produce innovative policy ideas for fair, democratic and sustainable communities across the North of England. IPPR North specialises in regional economics, localism and community policy. Our approach is collaborative and we benefit from extensive sub-national networks, regional associates, and a strong track record of engaging with policymakers at regional, sub-regional and local levels. IPPR North 2nd Floor, 3 Hardman Square Spinningfields, Manchester M3 3EB T: +44 (0)161 457 0535 E: [email protected] www.ippr.org/north Registered charity no. 800065 This paper was first published in March 2015. © 2015 The contents and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors only. NEW IDEAS for CHANGE CONTENTS Summary ............................................................................................................1 Background: the rationale and development of Transport for the North .................. 1 Purpose, objectives and vision ............................................................................... 1 Timetable and blueprint for development .............................................................. -
Hitler's Doubles
Hitler’s Doubles By Peter Fotis Kapnistos Fully-Illustrated Hitler’s Doubles Hitler’s Doubles: Fully-Illustrated By Peter Fotis Kapnistos [email protected] FOT K KAPNISTOS, ICARIAN SEA, GR, 83300 Copyright © April, 2015 – Cold War II Revision (Trump–Putin Summit) © August, 2018 Athens, Greece ISBN: 1496071468 ISBN-13: 978-1496071460 ii Hitler’s Doubles Hitler’s Doubles By Peter Fotis Kapnistos © 2015 - 2018 This is dedicated to the remote exploration initiatives of the Stargate Project from the 1970s up until now, and to my family and friends who endured hard times to help make this book available. All images and items are copyright by their respective copyright owners and are displayed only for historical, analytical, scholarship, or review purposes. Any use by this report is done so in good faith and with respect to the “Fair Use” doctrine of U.S. Copyright law. The research, opinions, and views expressed herein are the personal viewpoints of the original writers. Portions and brief quotes of this book may be reproduced in connection with reviews and for personal, educational and public non-commercial use, but you must attribute the work to the source. You are not allowed to put self-printed copies of this document up for sale. Copyright © 2015 - 2018 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iii Hitler’s Doubles The Cold War II Revision : Trump–Putin Summit [2018] is a reworked and updated account of the original 2015 “Hitler’s Doubles” with an improved Index. Ascertaining that Hitler made use of political decoys, the chronological order of this book shows how a Shadow Government of crisis actors and fake outcomes operated through the years following Hitler’s death –– until our time, together with pop culture memes such as “Wunderwaffe” climate change weapons, Brexit Britain, and Trump’s America. -
Solent Local Transport Body
APPENDIX B Solent Local Transport Body Assurance Framework Draft v-1 CONTENTS Assurance Framework Signatories 3 Introduction 4 Part 1: Purpose Structure and Operating Principles 5 1.1 Name 5 1.2 Geography 5 1.3 Membership 5 1.4 Review 6 1.5 Voting Arrangements 6 1.6 Conflicts of Interest 6 1.7 Gifts and Hospitality 6 1.8 Status and Role of Accountable Body 6 1.9 Audit and Scrutiny 7 1.10 Strategic Objectives and Purpose 7 1.11 Support and Administration 7 Agreements 1.12 Working Arrangements and Meeting 7 Frequency 1.13 Transparency and Engagement 8 1.14 Complaints and Whistleblowing 8 Part 2: Prioritisation 9 2.1 Prioritisation 9 2.2 Scheme Eligibility 13 Part 3: Programme Management and Investment 14 Decisions 3.1 Scheme Assessment and Approval 14 3.2 Approval Regime 14 3.3 The Transport Business Case 15 3.4 Value for Money 15 3.5 Monitoring and Evaluation 16 3.6 External Views on Business Cases 16 3.7 Release of Funding, Cost Control and 16 Approval Conditions 3.8 Programme and Risk Management 16 Appendix A Agreement Relating to the Solent Local 17 Transport Body Appendix B Solent LTB Boundary Proposal Letter 45 2 ASSURANCE FRAMEWORK SIGNATORIES Cllr. Mel Kendall Cllr. Jason Fazackarley Executive Member for Environment and Executive Member for Traffic and Transport & Deputy Leader of the Council Transportation Cllr. Edward Giles Russell Kew Executive Member for Procurement, Fire, Director Highways and Transport Cllr. Asa Thorpe Executive Member for Environment and Transport 3 INTRODUCTION This draft Assurance Framework sets out the arrangements that will be put in place to provide assurance that the Solent Local Transport Body (LTB) will operate in accordance with the Guidance for Local Transport Bodies, published by the Department for Transport (DfT) on 23rd November 2012. -
Solent Local Transport Body Transport Investment Priorities Within Indicative Funding Envelope
Solent Local Transport Body Transport Investment Priorities Within Indicative Funding Envelope July 2013 1 Contents Section Number Section Title Page Number 1 Introduction 3 2 Assessment 5 3 Transport Investment Priorities 8 4 Inter-LTB Transport Investment 9 Appendix 1 10 2 Section 1: Introduction 1.1 Background The Solent Local Transport Body (LTB) is a voluntary partnership between the four Local Transport Authorities of Hampshire County Council, Isle of Wight Council, Portsmouth City Council and Southampton City Council, the Solent Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP) and Partnership for Urban South Hampshire (PUSH) covering the area shown in Map 1, below. This boundary is coterminous with that of the Solent LEP and Transport for South Hampshire & Isle of Wight (TfSHIoW). Map 1: Solent LTB Area The LTB builds upon the existing structure of partnership working on strategic transport matters within the area, as provided by TfSHIoW. The LTB also includes the Solent LEP, which brings together the private and public sectors to set the economic strategy and priorities to realise sustainable economic growth and private sector investment in the Solent area, and PUSH, which brings together the local authorities of the area to facilitate the strategic planning functions necessary to support growth. In addition to the full (voting) members, the LTB has a range of Associate Members, including public transport operators, the ports and airport, local planning authorities and economic partnerships. The TfSHIoW Transport Delivery Plan (TDP), published in February this year, sets out the transport investment priorities for the Solent area. The TDP represents the output of a significant workstream that followed the DfT WebTAG process for identifying transport solutions that support sustainable economic growth in the Solent area. -
Approval of the Governance and Operation of the Coast to Capital
Cabinet Member for Highways and Transport Ref HT06(13/14) Approval of the Governance and operation of the Key Decision: Coast to Capital Local Transport Body Yes July 2013 Part I Report by Executive Director Communities Electoral Commissioning and Strategic Planning Manager Division(s): All Executive Summary The County Council seeks to establish a Local Transport Body for the Coast to Capital area along with Surrey County Council, Brighton & Hove City Council and Coast to Capital Local Enterprise Partnership. It will be known as the Coast to Capital Transport Body (the LTB) and it will decide priorities and manage a programme of investment in local major transport schemes in the Coast to Capital area (including West Sussex) from 2015 onwards. This report includes details of the proposed governance and decision-making arrangements, scheme assessment and administration for the LTB. Recommendations 1) To enter into formal arrangements with Surrey County Council, Brighton & Hove City Council and Coast to Capital Local Enterprise Partnership to establish the Coast to Capital Transport Body (the LTB) to administer devolved funding for local major transport schemes, through an agreement approved and signed by the Head of Law and Governance; 2) To approve that the County Council assumes the role of accountable body for the LTB as outlined in paragraph 1.4; and 3) To approve the arrangements for governance, scheme assessment, decision-making and administration of the LTB summarised in Appendix A, subject to the satisfactory resolution of issues as described in paragraph 2.4 – 2.5. 1. Introduction 1.1 In November 2012, the Department for Transport (DfT) published its intention to devolve decision-making on local major transport schemes to newly created Local Transport Bodies based on the geographical areas covered by the Local Enterprise Partnerships. -
Hampshire and Isle of Wight Skills Assessment 2002, Both of Which Are Available from the Council’S Website
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital Education Resource Archive Learning and Skills Council Hampshire and the Isle of Wight Local Strategic Plan 2002 - 2005 Part B Local Needs Assessment Contents Page No Section 1 The economic context 4 1.1 Economic overview 4 1.2 Industrial structure 4 1.3 VAT registrations and business survival rates 6 1.4 Population 9 1.5 Economic activity rates 10 1.6 Employment change 11 1.7 Self employment 13 1.8 Occupational structure 13 1.9 Earnings 14 1.10 Unemployment 14 Section 2 Skills and qualifications of individuals 17 2.1 Skills and qualifications held by the existing 17 workforce 2.2 Levels of qualifications 17 2.3 National and local learning targets 2002-2005 19 2.4 Schools performance 20 2.5 Achievement at Level 2 and Level 3 by age 19 21 2.6 Analysis of individual's skills 21 2.7 Basic skills 22 Section 3 Skill needs of employers 25 3.1 Importance of skills 25 3.2 Employer investment in training 25 Local Strategic Plan 2002-2005 2 Part B Local Needs Assessment 3.3 Employer skill gaps 26 3.4 Future skill needs of employers 26 3.5 Recruitment difficulties and skill shortages 26 Section 4 Participation in learning 29 4.1 Participation in post-16 education and training 29 4.2 Progression to higher education 29 4.3 Participation in learning that leads to a qualification 29 4.4 Participation in work-related learning 30 4.5 Participation in learning by adults 31 4.6 Destination of Year 11 school leavers 31 Section 5 Benefits, barriers and motivation -
THE SECRETARY of STATE for TRANSPORT and FIRST MTR SOUTH WESTERN TRAINS LIMITED
VERSION 1.0X ERMA FOIA 2000 PUBLIC REGISTER COPY RAIL PUBLIC REGISTER COPY REDACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FOIA 2000 Dated 19 September 2020 THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRANSPORT and FIRST MTR SOUTH WESTERN TRAINS LIMITED EMERGENCY RECOVERY MEASURES AGREEMENT ("ERMA") South West Rail ERMA Page 0 of 363 VERSION 1.0X ERMA FOIA 2000 PUBLIC REGISTER COPY Table of Contents Contents Page 1 Interpretation and Construction .......................................................................................... 1 2 Purpose of this ERMA and survival of EMA provisions .................................................... 3 3 Commencement and Term ................................................................................................... 4 4 Termination of the Franchise Agreement ........................................................................... 6 5 Amendments to the Franchise Agreement ......................................................................... 6 6 Co-operation .......................................................................................................................... 6 7 Additional Services ............................................................................................................... 7 8 Meetings ................................................................................................................................. 7 9 Remedial Plans, Action Plans and NRPS Action Plans ..................................................... 7 10 Fares ...................................................................................................................................... -
Action Plans and Key Projects
Winchester’s Economic Action Plan Final Draft Winchester Economic Action Plan (Final Draft) 1 Contents: Introduction Page 3 Context of the Economic Action Plan Page 4 Structure of the Economic Action Plan Page 5 Strategic fit of the Economic Action Plan Page 6 Working Together Page 7 State of Winchester’s Economy Page 8 Future of Winchester’s Economy Page 8 Action Plan Page 11 Appendix 1 - Glossary Page 17 Appendix 2 – Sustainability Appraisal Page 18 Appendix 3 – Equality and Diversity Page 19 Appendix 4 – Rural Proofing Page 20 Winchester Economic Action Plan (Final Draft) 2 Introduction: Winchester district enjoys a varied and prosperous Winchester encourages sustainable and the city has a economy. From the city centre retail, to industrial mainline station within an hour of London and links to the estate manufacturing, to rural land based activities, the south coast regions. There is also a National Express area has a lot to offer. service which links in with other centres and transport hubs across the country. The Park and Ride facility is popular With a population of over 109,000, the unemployment rate with both commuters and shoppers, and there is plentiful is stable at around 0.9% compared to the UK average of parking available within the town itself. Eastleigh 2.4% (Hampshire County Council, November 2005). The International Airport is 20 minutes away, and Gatwick and workforce is generally highly skilled, feeding a healthy Heathrow Airports within 90 minutes. knowledge economy. Winchester also supports a thriving creative sector. These are “those industries which have “Partnership is the key to success” their origin in individual creativity, skill and talent and which have a potential for wealth and job creation through the The district covers 250 square miles of Hampshire. -
Economy August 2018
Commission of Inquiry Vision for Hampshire 2050 Core Evidence Base Hampshire County Council Economy August 2018 Contents Foreword 3 Executive Summary 4 List of Tables and Figures 12 1. ECONOMY & BUSINESS 15 1.1 Economic activity across Hampshire 16 1.2 Economic growth and contribution to growth over time 18 1.3 Economic prosperity across Hampshire 22 1.4 Shift to services and the rise of knowledge-intensive services 28 1.5 Industrial specialisation 32 1.6 The labour market, competitiveness and productivity challenge 37 1.7 Hampshire businesses 46 1.8 High-growth businesses 61 1.9 Internationalisation 66 1.10 The outlook for Hampshire’s economy 78 2. INFRASTRUCTURE & INVESTMENT 87 2.1 Physical infrastructure 87 2.2 Digital infrastructure 91 2.3 Business space 95 2.4 Housing 101 2.5 Inward investment and foreign owned businesses 105 3. INNOVATION & SKILLS 110 3.1 Expenditure on Research & Development (R&D) 110 3.2 Patents 114 3.3 Knowledge Intensive Sectors 116 3.4 Science & Technology Sectors 122 3.5 Skills 129 Further information 132 References 133 Endnotes 137 Page | 2 Foreword Hampshire County Council has established a Commission of Inquiry to inform a Vision for Hampshire 2050 which will contribute to the future prosperity, quality of life, and protection and enhancement of the character and environment of Hampshire. The Commission is being undertaken under the following 6 themes: 1. Demographic and societal challenges 2. Economy 3. Work, skills and lifestyle 4. Environment and quality of place 5. Mobility, Connectivity and Energy 6. Rural Hampshire For each theme we are considering: Macro global and national trends and how these might represent threats and opportunities for Hampshire; What impacts we might be able to influence; Any specific actions or interventions which the public sector might have to consider to best prepare Hampshire for such trends/impacts.