Lernen Mit Dem Wolf Zu Leben
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Wolves in the Lower 48 States
BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR PETITION FOR A NATIONAL RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE WOLF (CANIS LUPUS) IN THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES OUTSIDE THE SOUTHWEST UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT Center for Biological Diversity Photo: Gary Kramer, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2 July 20, 2010 Ken Salazar, Secretary Rowan Gould, Acting Director Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Main Interior Building 1849 C Street NW 18th and C Streets, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20240 Washington, D.C. 20240 Re: Petition to the U.S. Department of Interior and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, for Development of a Recovery Plan for the Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) in the Conterminous United States Outside of the Southwest. Dear Secretary Salazar and Acting Director Gould: Pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 1533(f) of the Endangered Species Act and section 5 U.S.C. § 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act, the Center for Biological Diversity (“Center”) hereby petitions the U.S. Department of the Interior (“DOI”), by and through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“Service”), to develop a recovery plan for the gray wolf (Canis lupus) in the conterminous United States outside of the Southwest. Our petition excludes the Southwest on the premise that the Mexican gray wolf (Canis lupus baileyi) will be listed either as a subspecies or distinct population segment, as requested in the Center’s Mexican gray wolf listing petition of August 11, 2009. Should this not have occurred by the time the Service initiates development of a recovery plan for the wolf in the conterminous U.S. -
The Scientific Basis for Conserving Forest Carnivores: American Marten, Fisher, Lynx and Wolverine in the Western United States
United States The Scientific Basis for Conserving Forest Carnivores Department of Agriculture Forest Service American Marten, Fisher, Lynx, Rocky Mountain and Wolverine Forest and Range Experiment Station in the Western United States Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 General Technical Report RM-254 Abstract Ruggiero, Leonard F.; Aubry, Keith B.; Buskirk, Steven W.; Lyon, L. Jack; Zielinski, William J., tech. eds. 1994. The Scientific Basis for Conserving Forest Carnivores: American Marten, Fisher, Lynx and Wolverine in the Western United States. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-254. Ft. Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 184 p. This cooperative effort by USDA Forest Service Research and the National Forest System assesses the state of knowledge related to the conservation status of four forest carnivores in the western United States: American marten, fisher, lynx, and wolverine. The conservation assessment reviews the biology and ecology of these species. It also discusses management considerations stemming from what is known and identifies information needed. Overall, we found huge knowledge gaps that make it difficult to evaluate the species’ conservation status. In the western United States, the forest carnivores in this assessment are limited to boreal forest ecosystems. These forests are characterized by extensive landscapes with a component of structurally complex, mesic coniferous stands that are characteristic of late stages of forest development. The center of the distrbution of this forest type, and of forest carnivores, is the vast boreal forest of Canada and Alaska. In the western conterminous 48 states, the distribution of boreal forest is less continuous and more isolated so that forest carnivores and their habitats are more fragmented at the southern limits of their ranges. -
2010. Mexican Wolf Conservation Assessment
Mexican Wolf Conservation Assessment U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southwest Region (Region 2) Albuquerque, New Mexico 2010 Disclaimer Data from the Mexican Wolf Blue Range Reintroduction Project used in this document spans from 1998 to December 31, 2009, or for a range of years within this time period. Some of the data are only available in published form in annual reports, and thus reported only through December 31, 2008. 2 Acknowledgments The Mexican Wolf Conservation Assessment is dedicated to John Raymond Morgart, Ph.D. John passed away on October 14, 2009, at the age of 58. He led the Mexican wolf recovery program from 2004 to 2008 with enormous dedication and skill. His many contributions to the conservation of the Mexican wolf, including this document, are remembered with great gratitude. The following U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) staff have been instrumental in promoting and supporting the development of this document: Benjamin N. Tuggle, Regional Director, Region 2; Wendy Brown, Region 2 Recovery Coordinator; John Morgart, former Mexican Wolf Recovery Coordinator; Steve Chambers, Region 2 Senior Scientist; and John Slown, Biologist. Maggie Dwire, Assistant Mexican Wolf Recovery Coordinator, and John Oakleaf, Mexican Wolf Field Projects Coordinator, contributed tremendous time, information, and institutional knowledge of the program without which this document would not have been possible. Service employees Julie McIntyre, Brady McGee, John Slown, and Sarah Rinkevich assisted with literature compilation; Melanie Ikenson provided litigation summaries. The Mexican Wolf Adaptive Management Oversight Committee (AMOC) members also contributed profoundly to the development of the document with their insights and critique. -
Disentangling Canid Howls Across Multiple Species and Subspecies: Structure in a Complex Communication Channel
Disentangling canid howls across multiple species and subspecies: Structure in a complex communication channel Authors: Arik Kershenbaum, Holly Root-Gutteridge, Bilal Habib, Janice Koler-Matznick, Brian Mitchell, Vicente Palacios, & Sara Waller NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Behavioural Processes. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Behavioural Processes, [VOL# 124, (March 2016)] DOI# 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.01.006 Kershenbaum, Arik , Holly Root-Gutteridge, Bilal Habib, Janice Koler-Matznick, Brian Mitchell, Vicente Palacios, and Sara Waller. "Disentangling canid howls across multiple species and subspecies: Structure in a complex communication channel." Behavioural Processes 124 (March 2016): 149-157. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.01.006. Made available through Montana State University’s ScholarWorks scholarworks.montana.edu Elsevier Editorial System(tm) for Animal Behaviour Manuscript Draft Manuscript Number: Title: Disentangling canid howls across multiple species and subspecies: structure in a complex communication channel Article Type: UK Research paper Corresponding Author: Dr. Arik Kershenbaum, Corresponding Author's Institution: University of Cambridge First Author: Arik Kershenbaum Order of Authors: Arik Kershenbaum; Holly Root-Gutteridge; Bilal Habib; Janice Koler-Matznick; Brian Mitchell; Vicente Palacios; Sara Waller Abstract: Disentangling canid howls across multiple species and subspecies: structure in a complex communication channel Wolves, coyotes, and other canids are members of a diverse genus of top predators of considerable conservation and management interest. -
North American River Otter Husbandry Notebook, 3Rd Edition NORTH AMERICAN RIVER OTTER NORTH AMERICAN RIVER OTTER
Husbandry Notebook, 3rd Edition I North American River Otter Husbandry Notebook, 3rd Edition NORTH AMERICAN RIVER OTTER NORTH AMERICAN RIVER OTTER (Lontra canadensis) Edited by: Janice Reed-Smith Columbus Zoo and Aquarium 2008 Originally funded by: John Ball Zoological Garden Core Gorsuch Foundation Edition nd With the support of: The AZA Small Carnivore Taxonomic Advisory Group Husbandry Notebook, 2 II North American River Otter Husbandry Notebook, 3rd Edition NORTH AMERICAN RIVER OTTER “Alacris ad ludos est.” “It is quick to play” (Albertus Magnus, 13th Century teacher and naturalist) North American River Otter Husbandry Notebook 3rd Edition Published January 2008 John Ball Zoo, Grand Rapids, Michigan Jan Reed-Smith, Editor [email protected] Contributing authors: Kris Petrini, D.V.M.; Lucy Spelman, D.V.M.; Gwen Meyers, D.V.M., Sue Crissey, Ph.D; Chip Harshaw; Angela Carter; Mac McFeely; Maris Muzzy; Clio Smeeton; John Partridge; Sheila Sykes-Gatz; Jan Reed-Smith. III North American River Otter Husbandry Notebook, 3rd Edition In the days when the earth was new and there were no men but only animals the sun was far away in the sky. It was so far away that there was no summer. It was so far away that the trees and the grasses did not grow as they should. He-Who-Made-the-Animals saw how it was that there was not enough sun to heat the earth, and so he fashioned a snare. The Sun did not see the snare in his path, walked into the snare and the snare held him fast. The sun was close to the earth. -
Gray Wolf Paul C
P1: FBQ PB336A-23 Feldhammer/0180G May 21, 2003 16:46 23 Gray Wolf Paul C. Paquet Canis lupus and Allies Ludwig N. Carbyn NOMENCLATURE both to Canis lycaon, with a common name of red wolf. The recom- mended name is based on historical precedence (Brewster and Fritts C N. Gray wolf, timber wolf, tundra wolf, plains wolf, 1995). This proposal raises numerous legal, policy, and management Spanish, lobo; French, loup; Inuktituk, amaruq; here, we use the com- questions. mon name “gray” wolf for the description of all subpopulations, al- As an alternative to conventional taxonomic classifications, The- though gray may not be the predominant color phase over large regional berge (1991) proposed an ecological classification of wolf subspecies. areas (Wilson and Reeder 1993) Using major prey species and vegetation zones as the principal criteria, S N. Canis lupus his classification comprises 10 categories or “ecotypes.” These eco- logical criteria may or may not be correlated with morphological and Subspecies. As expected in a widely distributed species, considerable genetic differences. variation occurs across the vast range of the gray wolf. The designation of wolf subspecies according to recently formulated criteria (e.g., Avise and Ball 1990; O’Brien and Mayr 1991), which place subspecies on a EVOLUTION more empirical foundation, is not feasible at this time. The subspecific taxonomy of the gray wolf in North America has not been adequately The gray wolf is a member of the Canidae, or dog family, which is part analyzed by modern techniques and is unsatisfactory. A comprehensive of the order Carnivora. Although a distinct taxon, it is closely related molecular taxonomic revision of the species, using the much larger and to coyotes and Simien jackals (C. -
Learning to Live with Wolves
INFORMATION 2018 Guide Learning to live with wolves Questions from the domains of agriculture, forestry, hunting, tourism and politics About the authors: Peter Sürth holds an advanced degree in Animal Management and has eight years of experience researching wolves, bears and lynxes in Romania. In addition to authoring numerous articles and a wolf-themed children’s book, he has worked to promote ecotourism in Romania and has been a consultant to various international film projects. Dr Christine Miller is a wildlife biologist, journalist and hunter. She lives and works in Tegernsee Valley, in the heart of Bavaria’s “wolf county”. In addition to authoring books on wild animals and ungulates, she has many years of research experience in the Alps, New Zealand and England. Dr Janosch Arnold, a game biologist and hunter, is the head of “Wild- forschungsstelle Baden-Württemberg”, a wildlife research centre, and a former WWF specialist on large European mammals. In addition to au- thoring various articles on wildlife biology, he has conducted international research on predatory mammals and has taught at the university level. He is a member of the board of the “Vereinigung der Wildbiologen und Jagdwissenschaftler Deutschlands e. V.”, a German association of wildlife biologists and hunting researchers. Publication information Published by WWF Germany Date 09/2018 (5th edition; revised German version of the Leitfaden/Guide published in 2011) Authors Dr Janosch Arnold ([email protected]), Dr Christine Miller (post@christine miller.de), Peter Sürth ([email protected]) Support from Christian Pichler and Christina Reisenbichler/WWF Austria, Dr Fritz Völk/ÖBf, Dr Georg Rauer/FIWI, Moritz Klose/WWF Germany, Stella Weweler/WWF Germany, Nina Gandl/WWF Germany, Lucas Ende Translation Word Solid Editor/coordination Thomas Köberich/WWF Germany Layout Thomas Schlembach/WWF Germany Production Maro Ballach/WWF Germany Printing Aumüller Druck GmbH & Co. -
Colorado Wolves
PEOPLE AND PREDATOR SERIES COLORADO WOLVES INFORMATIONAL PACKAGE THETHE CENTER CENTER FOR FOR HUMAN-CARNIVORE COEXISTENCE HUMAN-CARNIVORE COEXISTENCE PEOPLE AND PREDATOR SERIES COLORADO WOLVES INFORMATIONAL PACKAGE PREFACE The Center for Human-Carnivore Coexistence (CHCC) at Colorado State University, in collaboration with the CSU Center for Collaborative Conservation and CSU Extension, have developed educational materials entitled the People and Predator Series. The Center for Human-Carnivore Coexistence and the Center for Collaborative Conservation are housed within the Warner College of Natural Resources at CSU. The People and Predator Series provides scientific information on the interactions between humans and carnivores. It includes information on a wide range of topics, including carnivore ecology, wildlife and livestock management, economics, and social dimensions of living with predators. Information Sheets are available to the public as publications through CSU Extension. The first installment of the People and Predator Series is on Colorado Wolves, published in June 2020. This series provides science-based information regarding the potential restoration of wolves in Colorado. The series has undergone extensive review by scientists both within and CSU. Included herein are the 12 Information Sheets that comprise the Colorado Wolves series. These Information Sheets are intended to educate the public and inform science-based policy but are not intended to state a position on any particular policy decision. THETHE CENTER CENTER -
An Account of the Taxonomy of North American Wolves from Morphological and Genetic
This manuscript has been submitted by the authors for publication in a scientific journal. Its contents should not be incorporated into other writings or publications without crediting the authors by citation of this manuscript. 1 An Account of the Taxonomy of North American Wolves from Morphological and Genetic 2 Analyses 3 4 Steven M. Chambers,* Steven R. Fain, Bud Fazio, Michael Amaral 5 6 S.M. Chambers 7 Division of Ecological Services, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, PO Box 1306, Albuquerque, 8 New Mexico 87103 9 10 S.R. Fain 11 National Forensics Laboratory, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1490 East Main Street, Ashland, 12 Oregon 97520-1310 13 14 B. Fazio 15 Mexican Wolf Recovery Program, New Mexico Ecological Services Field Office, U.S. Fish and 16 Wildlife Service, 2105 Osuna Road, NE, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87113. Current address: 17 Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, PO Box 1306, 18 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103. 19 20 M. Amaral 21 New England Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 70 Commercial Street, Suite 300 22 Concord, New Hampshire 03301-5087 23 1 This manuscript has been submitted by the authors for publication in a scientific journal. Its contents should not be incorporated into other writings or publications without crediting the authors by citation of this manuscript. 24 *Corresponding author: [email protected] 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 2 This manuscript has been submitted by the authors for publication in a scientific journal. -
SPECIES STATUS ASSESSMENT for the NORTH AMERICAN WOLVERINE (Gulo Gulo Luscus)
SPECIES STATUS ASSESSMENT FOR THE NORTH AMERICAN WOLVERINE (Gulo gulo luscus) Wolverines in southwestern Montana. Photo credit: Mark Packila; used with permission. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Version 1.2 March 1, 2018 North American Wolverine Species Status Assessment Report March 1, 2018 Suggested citation: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2018. Species status assessment report for the North American wolverine (Gulo gulo luscus). Version 1.2. March 2018. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Mountain-Prairie Region, Lakewood, CO. ii North American Wolverine Species Status Assessment Report March 1, 2018 Executive Summary The North American wolverine (Gulo gulo luscus; wolverine) is a medium-sized carnivore found within the west-northwestern contiguous United States, Alaska, and Canada. Systematic monitoring across the wolverine’s North American range has not been conducted given the difficulty in surveying this highly mobile species, and its occupancy within large and relatively inaccessible areas. A multi-state effort to determine wolverine occupancy in Montana, Idaho, and Washington was conducted in winter of 2016–2017 and in Wyoming for the winters of 2015– 2016 and 2016–2017. Results from this study are still being analyzed, but photographic detections of wolverines were found across all surveyed States, including areas where wolverines have not recently been observed. In Canada, the population is estimated to exceed 10,000 mature individuals and has been stable over the last two decades. Recent density estimates indicate no declining trend for wolverines in Alaska. Wolverine populations in Alaska are considered to be continuous with populations in the Yukon and British Columbia provinces of Canada. -
Canids: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan
IUCN/Species Survival Commission Foxes, Wolves, Jackals and Dogs Canids: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is one of six volunteer commissions of IUCN – The World Conservation Union, a union of sovereign states, government agencies and non- governmental organisations. IUCN has three basic conservation objectives: to secure the conservation of nature, and especially of biological diversity, as an essential foundation for the future; to ensure that where the Earth’s natural resources are used this is done in a wise, Canids: Foxes, Wolves, equitable and sustainable way; and to guide the development of human communities towards ways of life that are both of good quality and in enduring harmony with other components of the biosphere. Jackals and Dogs A volunteer network comprised of some 8,000 scientists, field researchers, government officials and conservation leaders from nearly every country of the world, the SSC membership is an unmatched source of information about biological diversity and its conservation. As such, SSC Edited by Claudio Sillero-Zubiri, Michael Hoffmann members provide technical and scientific counsel for conservation projects throughout the world and serve as resources to governments, international conventions and conservation and David W. Macdonald organisations. IUCN/SSC Action Plans assess the conservation status of species and their habitats, and specifies conservation priorities. The series is one of the world’s most authoritative sources of Survey and Conservation Action -
Arctic Biodiversity Assessment
78 Arctic Biodiversity Assessment Polar bears are iconic species of the Arctic, representing the fascination for wildlife in the cold northern region shared by people living in the Arctic as well as beyond. Photo: Wild Arctic Pictures/shutterstock.com 79 Chapter 3 Mammals Lead Authors Donald G. Reid, Dominique Berteaux and Kristin L. Laidre Contributing Authors Anders Angerbjörn, Robyn Angliss, Erik W. Born, Peter Boveng, Dean Cluff, Dorothee Ehrich, Steven H. Ferguson, Joel Garlich-Miller, Gilles Gauthier, Anne Gunn, Kit M. Kovacs, Nicolas Lecomte, Lloyd F. Lowry, Philip McLoughlin, Dennis Litovka, Sue Moore, Kaisu Mustonen, Tero Mustonen, Linh Nguyen, Elizabeth Peacock, Kim Poole, Lori Quakenbush, Don Russell, Niels M. Schmidt, Boris Sheftel, Michael Simpkins, Benoit Sittler, Brian Slough, Andrew Smith, Fernando Ugarte, Dag Vongraven and Øystein Wiig Contents Summary ............................................................... 80 3.6. Marine mammals ..................................................109 3.1. Introduction ........................................................ 81 3.6.1. Species richness and distribution ............................109 3.6.1.1. Status ...............................................109 3.2. Biogeography ...................................................... 82 3.6.1.2. Trends ..............................................112 3.2.1. Terrestrial mammals .......................................... 82 3.6.2. Population sizes and densities ...............................113 3.2.2. Marine mammals ............................................