Arctic Biodiversity Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Arctic Biodiversity Assessment 78 Arctic Biodiversity Assessment Polar bears are iconic species of the Arctic, representing the fascination for wildlife in the cold northern region shared by people living in the Arctic as well as beyond. Photo: Wild Arctic Pictures/shutterstock.com 79 Chapter 3 Mammals Lead Authors Donald G. Reid, Dominique Berteaux and Kristin L. Laidre Contributing Authors Anders Angerbjörn, Robyn Angliss, Erik W. Born, Peter Boveng, Dean Cluff, Dorothee Ehrich, Steven H. Ferguson, Joel Garlich-Miller, Gilles Gauthier, Anne Gunn, Kit M. Kovacs, Nicolas Lecomte, Lloyd F. Lowry, Philip McLoughlin, Dennis Litovka, Sue Moore, Kaisu Mustonen, Tero Mustonen, Linh Nguyen, Elizabeth Peacock, Kim Poole, Lori Quakenbush, Don Russell, Niels M. Schmidt, Boris Sheftel, Michael Simpkins, Benoit Sittler, Brian Slough, Andrew Smith, Fernando Ugarte, Dag Vongraven and Øystein Wiig Contents Summary ............................................................... 80 3.6. Marine mammals ..................................................109 3.1. Introduction ........................................................ 81 3.6.1. Species richness and distribution ............................109 3.6.1.1. Status ...............................................109 3.2. Biogeography ...................................................... 82 3.6.1.2. Trends ..............................................112 3.2.1. Terrestrial mammals .......................................... 82 3.6.2. Population sizes and densities ...............................113 3.2.2. Marine mammals ............................................. 83 3.6.2.1. Status ................................................113 3.3. Terrestrial herbivorous mammals ................................... 85 3.6.2.2. Trends ..............................................117 3.3.1. Species richness and distribution ............................. 85 3.6.2.3. Causes and prospects ...............................119 3.3.1.1. Status ................................................ 85 3.7. Conclusions and recommendations ...............................121 3.3.1.2. Trends ................................................ 87 3.7.1. Valuable areas and productivity hotspots ....................121 3.3.1.3. Causes and prospects ................................ 88 3.7.2. Key knowledge gaps ........................................122 3.3.2. Population sizes and densities ................................ 90 3.7.3. Recommended conservation actions ........................123 3.3.2.1. Status ................................................ 90 3.7.4. Other key messages .........................................124 3.3.2.2. Trends ................................................ 92 3.3.2.3. Causes and prospects ................................ 97 Acknowledgements ....................................................124 3.4. Terrestrial insectivorous mammals ................................. 99 References .............................................................124 3.4.1. Species richness and distribution ............................100 3.4.1.1. Status ...............................................100 3.4.1.2. Trends ...............................................100 3.4.1.3. Causes and prospects ...............................100 3.4.2. Population sizes and densities ...............................100 3.4.2.1. Status ...............................................100 3.4.2.2. Trends ...............................................100 The bears are more hungry. There is a problem with the 3.4.2.3. Causes and prospects ...............................101 » ice. The rough ice makes it hard for them to find seals, 3.5. Terrestrial carnivorous mammals ..................................101 but there is the same number of seals. […] The only 3.5.1. Species richness and distribution .............................102 3.5.1.1. Status ...............................................102 change I’ve noticed is when I was growing up the polar 3.5.1.2. Trends ...............................................102 bears would scare easily and run away. Even when they 3.5.1.3. Causes and prospects ...............................104 were around shacks they didn’t break windows or do 3.5.2. Population sizes and densities ...............................104 damage but now they are not afraid. They used to avoid 3.5.2.1. Status ...............................................104 communities before and now they don’t. 3.5.2.2. Trends ...............................................106 3.5.2.3. Causes and prospects ...............................107 Dowsley 2007. 80 Arctic Biodiversity Assessment SUMMARY mercial interests have driven major declines in some populations of whales and reindeer, but intensive harvest There have been substantial changes during the past management has demonstrated that many populations can 50 years in the distribution and abundance of numer- recover, and that various species can sustain well-regulat- ous Arctic mammals. The intensity and scope of these ed harvests (e.g. whales, polar bears, seals, reindeer and changes have been more pronounced in marine than caribou, Arctic fox Vulpes lagopus). Indigenous peoples terrestrial mammals. However, the lack of quantitative have strong cultural and economic ties to the harvesting information for many species means that our assessment of mammals. These can be sustained with a combination is biased towards the larger, more conspicuous and more of cultural tradition and better science-based monitoring economically useful species. of population sizes and harvest levels. One set of changes is driven by a warming climate. Re- Humans have introduced or re-introduced populations ductions in the duration, extent and quality of sea ice of some species in the Arctic, considerably influencing are forcing ice-dependent mammals (notably polar bears their distributions and ecological roles. North American Ursus maritimus, seals and walrus Odobenus rosmarus) to species such as muskrat Ondatra zibethicus and American change feeding behavior and areas, change habitats for mink Neovison vison, introduced to Eurasia, have spread reproduction and resting, and often travel further, with into the low Arctic. Relocations of muskoxen have been consequent reductions in population productivity and successful in numerous circumpolar sites. We recom- size. Increased frequency of winter rain and melting mend against future introductions of mammals to previ- temperatures create ice cover on the ground or in the ously unoccupied ranges, especially islands, because of snowpack, making it more difficult for caribou/rein- uncertain and often disruptive ecological impacts. deer Rangifer tarandus and muskoxen Ovibos moschatus to reach food, and sometimes causing die-offs. Warming The Arctic is experiencing more human activity and temperatures are driving greater growth and spread of infrastructure developments at sea and on land in recent primarily shrubs, but also trees, transforming the low decades, as a result of hydrocarbon and mineral explo- Arctic tundra to sub-Arctic conditions with resultant in- ration and developments, new shipping routes, new flux of species (notably moose Alces americanus, Eurasian roads and increased tourism. These bring risks of direct elk Alces alces, American beaver Castor canadensis and mortality (e.g. oiling from spills, ship collisions), of dis- snowshoe hare Lepus americanus) that can use this new placement from critical habitats (e.g. calving, pupping habitat. Later onset of snow in autumn and earlier spring and feeding areas), of disturbance (e.g. aircraft, road melt shorten the duration and quality of the snow cover or ship noise interfering with whale feeding or caribou that is essential for lemming winter reproduction, and suckling), and of increased human harvests. are implicated in reduced amplitude and longer periods in lemming cycles, and therefore reduced availability of The following are high priority actions to mitigate the lemming prey for numerous predators. risks of increasing human activities: (1) an expanded system of protected areas or more intensively managed In addition to these patterns, other processes related to a zones, especially marine, with emphasis on coastlines, warming climate include: changes in the onset, duration polynyas, deltas, the edge of the ice pack, and caribou and amount of plant growth, changing distributions of calving grounds, (2) harmonized, cross-jurisdictional, ice-associated marine productivity, increased frequency regulatory and assessment regimes for ocean shipping, of boreal and tundra wild fires, changes in the relative aircraft routing, seismic and drilling activities, hydro- abundance of particular plant groups in tundra habitats, carbon and mineral developments and tourism, and (3) changing insect distribution and abundance, changing a more complete mammal distribution and abundance distributions of parasites and pests, together with more monitoring program designed to test alternative hypoth- extreme weather events and storms. These are likely to eses regarding mechanisms driving changes. have direct or indirect effects on the distribution, carry- ing capacity, productivity and ultimately population size Arctic carnivorous mammals, especially marine, have of various mammals (notably migratory tundra caribou increasing levels of contaminants, notably organochlo- and voles). However, at present we still lack sufficient rines and heavy metals, as a result of increased delivery information to draw strong inferences about causal of these substances
Recommended publications
  • Diptera: Calyptratae)
    Systematic Entomology (2020), DOI: 10.1111/syen.12443 Protein-encoding ultraconserved elements provide a new phylogenomic perspective of Oestroidea flies (Diptera: Calyptratae) ELIANA BUENAVENTURA1,2 , MICHAEL W. LLOYD2,3,JUAN MANUEL PERILLALÓPEZ4, VANESSA L. GONZÁLEZ2, ARIANNA THOMAS-CABIANCA5 andTORSTEN DIKOW2 1Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Berlin, Germany, 2National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, U.S.A., 3The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, U.S.A., 4Department of Biological Sciences, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, U.S.A. and 5Department of Environmental Science and Natural Resources, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain Abstract. The diverse superfamily Oestroidea with more than 15 000 known species includes among others blow flies, flesh flies, bot flies and the diverse tachinid flies. Oestroidea exhibit strikingly divergent morphological and ecological traits, but even with a variety of data sources and inferences there is no consensus on the relationships among major Oestroidea lineages. Phylogenomic inferences derived from targeted enrichment of ultraconserved elements or UCEs have emerged as a promising method for resolving difficult phylogenetic problems at varying timescales. To reconstruct phylogenetic relationships among families of Oestroidea, we obtained UCE loci exclusively derived from the transcribed portion of the genome, making them suitable for larger and more integrative phylogenomic studies using other genomic and transcriptomic resources. We analysed datasets containing 37–2077 UCE loci from 98 representatives of all oestroid families (except Ulurumyiidae and Mystacinobiidae) and seven calyptrate outgroups, with a total concatenated aligned length between 10 and 550 Mb. About 35% of the sampled taxa consisted of museum specimens (2–92 years old), of which 85% resulted in successful UCE enrichment.
    [Show full text]
  • Likely to Have Habitat Within Iras That ALLOW Road
    Item 3a - Sensitive Species National Master List By Region and Species Group Not likely to have habitat within IRAs Not likely to have Federal Likely to have habitat that DO NOT ALLOW habitat within IRAs Candidate within IRAs that DO Likely to have habitat road (re)construction that ALLOW road Forest Service Species Under NOT ALLOW road within IRAs that ALLOW but could be (re)construction but Species Scientific Name Common Name Species Group Region ESA (re)construction? road (re)construction? affected? could be affected? Bufo boreas boreas Boreal Western Toad Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Plethodon vandykei idahoensis Coeur D'Alene Salamander Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Rana pipiens Northern Leopard Frog Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Accipiter gentilis Northern Goshawk Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Ammodramus bairdii Baird's Sparrow Bird 1 No No Yes No No Anthus spragueii Sprague's Pipit Bird 1 No No Yes No No Centrocercus urophasianus Sage Grouse Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Cygnus buccinator Trumpeter Swan Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Falco peregrinus anatum American Peregrine Falcon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Gavia immer Common Loon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Histrionicus histrionicus Harlequin Duck Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Lanius ludovicianus Loggerhead Shrike Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Oreortyx pictus Mountain Quail Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Otus flammeolus Flammulated Owl Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides albolarvatus White-Headed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides arcticus Black-Backed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Speotyto cunicularia Burrowing
    [Show full text]
  • 8 April 2021 Mr. Jon Kurland Assistant
    8 April 2021 Mr. Jon Kurland Assistant Regional Administrator Protected Resources Division, Alaska Region National Marine Fisheries Service P.O. Box 21668 Juneau, Alaska 99082-1668 Dear Mr. Kurland: The Marine Mammal Commission (the Commission), in consultation with its Committee of Scientific Advisors on Marine Mammals, has reviewed the National Marine Fisheries Service’s (NMFS) 8 January 2021 Federal Register notice (86 Fed. Reg. 1452) revising its proposed designation of critical habitat for Arctic ringed seals (Phoca hispida hispida)1 and reopening the comment period on that proposal. The Commission offers the following comments and recommendations. Background On 28 December 2012, NMFS published a final rule listing the Arctic ringed seal as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) (77 Fed. Reg. 76706) and requesting information on physical and biological features essential to the conservation of Arctic ringed seals and on economic consequences of designating critical habitat for this species. Section 3(5)(A) of the ESA defines “critical habitat” as: (i) the specific areas within the geographical area occupied by the species, at the time it is listed in accordance with section 4 of this Act, on which are found those physical or biological features (I) essential to the conservation of the species and (II) which may require special management considerations or protection; and (ii) specific areas outside the geographical area occupied by the species at the time it is listed in accordance with the provisions of section 4 of this Act, upon a determination by the Secretary that such areas are essential for the conservation of the species.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Monitoring Reveals Topographical Features and Vegetation Explain Winter Habitat Use of an Arctic Rodent
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.24.427984; this version posted January 26, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Title 2 Long-term monitoring reveals topographical features and vegetation explain winter habitat 3 use of an Arctic rodent 4 Abstract 5 Collapsing lemming cycles have been observed across the Arctic, presumably due to global 6 warming creating less favorable winter conditions. The quality of wintering habitats, such as 7 depth of snow cover, plays a key role in sustaining population dynamics of arctic lemmings. 8 However, few studies so far investigated habitat use during the arctic winter. Here, we used a 9 unique long-term time series to test whether lemmings are associated with topographical and 10 vegetational habitat features for their winter refugi. We examined yearly numbers and 11 distribution of 22,769 winter nests of the collared lemming Dicrostonyx groenlandicus from 12 an ongoing long-term research on Traill Island, Northeast Greenland, collected between 1989 13 and 2019, and correlated this information with data on dominant vegetation types, elevation 14 and slope. We specifically asked if lemming nests were more frequent at sites with preferred 15 food plants such as Dryas octopetala x integrifolia and at sites with increased snow cover. We 16 found that the number of lemming nests was highest in areas with a high proportion of Dryas 17 heath, but also correlated with other vegetation types which suggest some flexibility in 18 resource use of wintering lemmings.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Seabirds and Shrinking Sea Ice: Egg Analyses Reveal the Importance
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Arctic seabirds and shrinking sea ice: egg analyses reveal the importance of ice-derived resources Fanny Cusset1*, Jérôme Fort2, Mark Mallory3, Birgit Braune4, Philippe Massicotte1 & Guillaume Massé1,5 In the Arctic, sea-ice plays a central role in the functioning of marine food webs and its rapid shrinking has large efects on the biota. It is thus crucial to assess the importance of sea-ice and ice-derived resources to Arctic marine species. Here, we used a multi-biomarker approach combining Highly Branched Isoprenoids (HBIs) with δ13C and δ15N to evaluate how much Arctic seabirds rely on sea-ice derived resources during the pre-laying period, and if changes in sea-ice extent and duration afect their investment in reproduction. Eggs of thick-billed murres (Uria lomvia) and northern fulmars (Fulmarus glacialis) were collected in the Canadian Arctic during four years of highly contrasting ice conditions, and analysed for HBIs, isotopic (carbon and nitrogen) and energetic composition. Murres heavily relied on ice-associated prey, and sea-ice was benefcial for this species which produced larger and more energy-dense eggs during icier years. In contrast, fulmars did not exhibit any clear association with sympagic communities and were not impacted by changes in sea ice. Murres, like other species more constrained in their response to sea-ice variations, therefore appear more sensitive to changes and may become the losers of future climate shifts in the Arctic, unlike more resilient species such as fulmars. Sea ice plays a central role in polar marine ecosystems; it drives the phenology of primary producers that con- stitute the base of marine food webs.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 Canadian High Arctic-North Greenland
    15/18: LME FACTSHEET SERIES CANADIAN HIGH ARCTIC-NORTH GREENLAND LME tic LMEs Arc CANADIAN HIGH ARCTIC-NORTH GREENLAND LME MAP 18 of Central Map Arctic Ocean LME North Pole Ellesmere Island Iceland Greenland 15 "1 ARCTIC LMEs Large ! Marine Ecosystems (LMEs) are defined as regions of work of the ArcNc Council in developing and promoNng the ocean space of 200,000 km² or greater, that encompass Ecosystem Approach to management of the ArcNc marine coastal areas from river basins and estuaries to the outer environment. margins of a conNnental shelf or the seaward extent of a predominant coastal current. LMEs are defined by ecological Joint EA Expert group criteria, including bathymetry, hydrography, producNvity, and PAME established an Ecosystem Approach to Management tropically linked populaNons. PAME developed a map expert group in 2011 with the parNcipaNon of other ArcNc delineaNng 17 ArcNc Large Marine Ecosystems (ArcNc LME's) Council working groups (AMAP, CAFF and SDWG). This joint in the marine waters of the ArcNc and adjacent seas in 2006. Ecosystem Approach Expert Group (EA-EG) has developed a In a consultaNve process including agencies of ArcNc Council framework for EA implementaNon where the first step is member states and other ArcNc Council working groups, the idenNficaNon of the ecosystem to be managed. IdenNfying ArcNc LME map was revised in 2012 to include 18 ArcNc the ArcNc LMEs represents this first step. LMEs. This is the current map of ArcNc LMEs used in the This factsheet is one of 18 in a series of the ArcCc LMEs. OVERVIEW: CANADIAN HIGH ARCTIC-NORTH GREENLAND LME The Canadian High Arcc-North Greenland LME (CAA) consists of the northernmost and high arcc part of Canada along with the adjacent part of North Greenland.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammal Extinction Facilitated Biome Shift and Human Population Change During the Last Glacial Termination in East-Central Europeenikő
    Mammal Extinction Facilitated Biome Shift and Human Population Change During the Last Glacial Termination in East-Central EuropeEnikő Enikő Magyari ( [email protected] ) Eötvös Loránd University Mihály Gasparik Hungarian Natural History Museum István Major Hungarian Academy of Science György Lengyel University of Miskolc Ilona Pál Hungarian Academy of Science Attila Virág MTA-MTM-ELTE Research Group for Palaeontology János Korponai University of Public Service Zoltán Szabó Eötvös Loránd University Piroska Pazonyi MTA-MTM-ELTE Research Group for Palaeontology Research Article Keywords: megafauna, extinction, vegetation dynamics, biome, climate change, biodiversity change, Epigravettian, late glacial Posted Date: August 11th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-778658/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/27 Abstract Studying local extinction times, associated environmental and human population changes during the last glacial termination provides insights into the causes of mega- and microfauna extinctions. In East-Central (EC) Europe, Palaeolithic human groups were present throughout the last glacial maximum (LGM), but disappeared suddenly around 15 200 cal yr BP. In this study we use radiocarbon dated cave sediment proles and a large set of direct AMS 14C dates on mammal bones to determine local extinction times that are compared with the Epigravettian population decline, quantitative climate models, pollen and plant macrofossil inferred climate and biome reconstructions and coprophilous fungi derived total megafauna change for EC Europe. Our results suggest that the population size of large herbivores decreased in the area after 17 700 cal yr BP, when temperate tree abundance and warm continental steppe cover both increased in the lowlands Boreal forest expansion took place around 16 200 cal yr BP.
    [Show full text]
  • Legged Buzzards Cope with Changing Small Rodent Communities?
    Received: 20 February 2019 | Revised: 26 July 2019 | Accepted: 2 August 2019 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14790 PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLE Flexibility in a changing arctic food web: Can rough‐legged buzzards cope with changing small rodent communities? Ivan A. Fufachev1 | Dorothee Ehrich2 | Natalia A. Sokolova1,3 | Vasiliy A. Sokolov4 | Aleksandr A. Sokolov1,3 1Arctic Research Station of Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch of Russian Abstract Academy of Sciences, Labytnangi, Russia Indirect effects of climate change are often mediated by trophic interactions and 2 Department of Arctic and Marine consequences for individual species depend on how they are tied into the local food Biology, UiT – The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway web. Here we show how the response of demographic rates of an arctic bird of prey 3Arctic Research Center of Yamal‐Nenets to fluctuations in small rodent abundance changed when small rodent community Autonomous District, Salekhard, Russia composition and dynamics changed, possibly under the effect of climate warming. 4Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, We observed the breeding biology of rough‐legged buzzards (Buteo lagopus) at the Ekaterinburg, Russia Erkuta Tundra Monitoring Site in southern Yamal, low arctic Russia, for 19 years Correspondence (1999–2017). At the same time, data on small rodent abundance were collected and Dorothee Ehrich, Department of Arctic and information on buzzard diet was obtained from pellet dissection. The small rodent Marine Biology, UiT – The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway. community experienced a shift from high‐amplitude cycles to dampened fluctua‐ Email: [email protected] tions paralleled with a change in species composition toward less lemmings and more Funding information voles.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Agriculture
    FOR ALUMNI AND FRIENDS OF DALHOUSIE’S FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE SPRING 2021 Atlantic agriculture In memory Passing of Jim Goit In June 2020, campus was saddened with the sudden passing The Agricultural Campus and the Alumni Association of Jim Goit, former executive director, Development & External acknowledge the passing of the following alumni. We extend Relations. Jim had a long and lustrous 35-year career with the our deepest sympathy to family, friends and classmates. Province of NS, 11 of which were spent at NSAC (and the Leonard D’Eon 1940 Faculty of Agriculture). Jim’s impact on campus was Arnold Blenkhorn 1941 monumental – he developed NSAC’s first website, created Clara Galway 1944 an alumni and fundraising program and built and maintained Thomas MacNaughton 1946 many critical relationships. For his significant contributions, George Leonard 1947 Jim was awarded an honourary Barley Ring in 2012. Gerald Friars 1948 James Borden 1950 Jim retired in February 2012 and was truly living his best life. Harry Stewart 1951 On top of enjoying the extra time with his wife, Barb, their sons Stephen Cook 1954 and four grandchildren, he became highly involved in the Truro Gerald Foote 1956 Rotary Club and taught ski lessons in the winter. In retirement, Albert Smith 1957 Jim also enjoyed cooking, travelling, yard work and cycling. George Mauger 1960 Phillip Harrison 1960 In honour of Jim’s contributions to campus and the Alumni Barbara Martin 1962 Association, a bench was installed in front of Cumming Peter Dekker 1964 Hall in late November. Wayne Bhola Neil Murphy 1964 (Class of ’74) kindly constructed the Weldon Smith 1973 beautiful bench in Jim’s memory.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Canada Guidelines for Drinking Water Supply Systems
    Water SupplySystems Storage, Distribution Atlant i c Canada Guidelines , andOperationof Atlantic Canada Guidelines for the Supply, for Treatment, Storage, t h Distribution, and e Supply, Operation of Drinking Water Supply Systems Dr i Treatment, n king September 2004 Prepared by: Coordinated by the Atlantic Canada Water Works Association (ACWWA) in association with the four Atlantic Canada Provinces WATER SYSTEM DESIGN GUIDELINE MANUAL PURPOSE AND USE OF MANUAL Page 1 PURPOSE AND USE OF MANUAL Purpose The purpose of the Atlantic Canada Guidelines for the Supply, Treatment, Storage, Distribution and Operation of Drinking Water Supply Systems is to provide a guide for the development of water supply projects in Atlantic Canada. The document is intended to serve as a guide in the evaluation of water supplies, and for the design and preparation of plans and specifications for projects. The document will suggest limiting values for items upon which an evaluation of such plans and specifications may be made by the regulator, and will establish, as far is practical, uniformity of practice. The document should be considered to be a companion to the Atlantic Canada Standards and Guidelines Manual for the Collection, Treatment and Disposal of Sanitary Sewage. Limitations Users of the Manual are advised that requirements for specific issues such as filtration, equipment redundancy, and disinfection are not uniform among the Atlantic Canada provinces, and that the appropriate regulator should be contacted prior to, or during, an investigation to discuss specific key requirements. Approval Process Chapter 1 of the Manual provides an overview of the approval process generally used by the regulators.
    [Show full text]
  • Variation in the Intensity and Prevalence of Macroparasites in Migratory Caribou: a Quasi-Circumpolar Study
    Canadian Journal of Zoology Variation in the intensity and prevalence of macroparasites in migratory caribou: a quasi-circumpolar study Journal: Canadian Journal of Zoology Manuscript ID cjz-2015-0190.R2 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the Author: 21-Mar-2016 Complete List of Authors: Simard, Alice-Anne; Université Laval, Département de biologie et Centre d'études nordiques Kutz, Susan; University of Calgary Ducrocq, Julie;Draft Calgary University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Beckmen, Kimberlee; Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Wildlife Conservation Brodeur, Vincent; Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs, Direction de la gestion de la faune du Nord-du-Québec Campbell, Mitch; Government of Nunavut, Department of Environment Croft, Bruno; Government of the Northwest Territories, Environment and Natural Resources Cuyler, Christine; Greenland Institute of Natural Resources, Davison, Tracy; Government of the Northwest Territories in Inuvik, Department of ENR Elkin, Brett; Government of the Northwest Territories, Environment and Natural Resources Giroux, Tina; Athabasca Denesuline Né Né Land Corporation Kelly, Allicia; Government of the Northwest Territories, Environment and Natural Resources Russell, Don; Environnement Canada Taillon, Joëlle; Université Laval, Département de biologie et Centre d'études nordiques Veitch, Alasdair; Government of the Northwest Territories, Environment and Natural Resources Côté, Steeve D.; Université Laval, Département de Biologie and Centre of Northern Studies COMPARATIVE < Discipline, parasite, caribou, Rangifer tarandus, helminth, Keyword: arthropod, monitoring https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjz-pubs Page 1 of 46 Canadian Journal of Zoology 1 Variation in the intensity and prevalence of macroparasites in migratory caribou: a quasi-circumpolar study Alice-Anne Simard, Susan Kutz, Julie Ducrocq, Kimberlee Beckmen, Vincent Brodeur, Mitch Campbell, Bruno Croft, Christine Cuyler, Tracy Davison, Brett Elkin, Tina Giroux, Allicia Kelly, Don Russell, Joëlle Taillon, Alasdair Veitch, Steeve D.
    [Show full text]
  • Thaw Pond Development and Initial Vegetation Succession in Experimental Plots at a Siberian Lowland Tundra Site
    Plant Soil (2017) 420:147–162 DOI 10.1007/s11104-017-3369-8 REGULAR ARTICLE Thaw pond development and initial vegetation succession in experimental plots at a Siberian lowland tundra site Bingxi Li & Monique M. P. D. Heijmans & Daan Blok & Peng Wang & Sergey V. Karsanaev & Trofim C. Maximov & Jacobus van Huissteden & Frank Berendse Received: 15 March 2017 /Accepted: 3 August 2017 /Published online: 22 August 2017 # The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication Abstract Methods In the experiment, we measured changes in Background and aims Permafrost degradation has the soil thaw depth, plant species cover and soil subsidence potential to change the Arctic tundra landscape. We over nine years (2007–2015). observed rapid local thawing of ice-rich permafrost Results After abrupt initial thaw, soil subsidence in the resulting in thaw pond formation, which was triggered removal plots continued indicating further thawing of − by removal of the shrub cover in a field experiment. permafrost albeit at a much slower pace: 1 cm y 1 over − This study aimed to examine the rate of permafrost thaw 2012–2015 vs. 5 cm y 1 over 2007–2012. Grass cover and the initial vegetation succession after the permafrost strongly increased after the initial shrub removal, but collapse. later declined with ponding of water in the subsiding removal plots. Sedges established and expanded in the wetter removal plots. Thereby, the removal plots have Responsible Editor: Zucong Cai. become increasingly similar to nearby ‘natural’ thaw Electronic supplementary material The online version of this ponds. article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3369-8)contains Conclusions The nine years of field observations in a supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
    [Show full text]