Guernsey Bar Examinations Syllabus 2019
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Economic and Social Council
UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL E/C.12/GBR/5/Add.1 12 February 2008 Original: ENGLISH Substantive session of 2008 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS Fifth periodic reports submitted by States parties under articles 16 and 17 of the Covenant Addendum UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND: CROWN DEPENDENCIES [7 August 2007] GE.08-40456 (E) 110308 E/C.12/GBR/5/Add.1 page 2 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page CHAPTER l. REPORT FROM THE BAILIWICK OF GUERNSEY AND ITS DEPENDENCIES ................................................. 1 - 308 3 CHAPTER 2. REPORT FROM THE BAILIWICK OF JERSEY ............... 309 - 604 55 CHAPTER 3. REPORT FROM THE ISLE OF MAN ................................. 605 - 622 119 E/C.12/GBR/5/Add.1 page 3 CHAPTER I. REPORT FROM THE BAILIWICK OF GUERNSEY AND ITS DEPENDENCIES 1. Statistics (includes the sections “land and people” and “economic, social and cultural characteristics”)1 Population • 76,315 (Isle of Man - in 2001). • 88,200 (Bailiwick of Jersey - in 2005). • 63,267 (Bailiwick of Guernsey - in 2001). Number of men per 100 women • 96 (Isle of Man - in 2001). • 95 (Bailiwick of Jersey - in 2001). • 98 (Bailiwick of Guernsey - in 2001). Ethnic groups • 51% Jersey, 35% UK, 6% Portuguese/Madeiran, 3% Irish (Bailiwick of Jersey - in 2001). • 60.8% Guernsey, 0.6% Jersey, 25.9% UK, 0.6% Irish, 1.8% Portuguese, 1.5% Other EU, 0.6% Other Europe, 2.3% Other - (Bailiwick of Guernsey - in 2001). Percentage of population under 15 • 17.8% (Isle of Man - in 2001). • 15.7% (Bailiwick of Guernsey - in 2001). -
Guernsey, 1814-1914: Migration in a Modernising Society
GUERNSEY, 1814-1914: MIGRATION IN A MODERNISING SOCIETY Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Leicester by Rose-Marie Anne Crossan Centre for English Local History University of Leicester March, 2005 UMI Number: U594527 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U594527 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 GUERNSEY, 1814-1914: MIGRATION IN A MODERNISING SOCIETY ROSE-MARIE ANNE CROSSAN Centre for English Local History University of Leicester March 2005 ABSTRACT Guernsey is a densely populated island lying 27 miles off the Normandy coast. In 1814 it remained largely French-speaking, though it had been politically British for 600 years. The island's only town, St Peter Port (which in 1814 accommodated over half the population) had during the previous century developed a thriving commercial sector with strong links to England, whose cultural influence it began to absorb. The rural hinterland was, by contrast, characterised by a traditional autarkic regime more redolent of pre industrial France. By 1914, the population had doubled, but St Peter Port's share had fallen to 43 percent. -
Billet D'état
XXIII BILLET D’ÉTAT 2010 WEDNESDAY, 24th NOVEMBER 2010 Volume 1 1. Projet de Loi entitled “The Tobacco Products (Enabling Provisions) (Guernsey) Law, 2010”, p. 1655 2. The Misuse of Drugs (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law, 1974 (Amendment) Ordinance, 2010, p. 1655 3. The Income Tax (Guernsey) (Approval of Agreement with Portugal) Ordinance, 2010, p. 1655 4. The Attendance and Invalid Care Allowances Ordinance, 2010, p. 1655 5. The Supplementary Benefit (Implementation) (Amendment) Ordinance, 2010, p. 1656 6. The Health Service (Benefit) (Amendment) Ordinance, 2010, p. 1656 7. The Social Insurance (Rates of Contributions and Benefits, etc.) Ordinance, 2010, p. 1656 8. The Family Allowances Ordinance, 2010, p. 1656 9. Treasury and Resources Department – Amendments to Income Tax legislation relating to Relief for Pension Contributions and Taxation of Benefits arising from Pension Schemes, p. 1657 10. Treasury and Resources Department – Proposal for the Abolition of Retention Tax, p. 1670 11. Treasury and Resources Department – Sale or Lease of States Properties of Historic Importance, p. 1677 12. Commerce and Employment Department – Deposit Compensation Scheme Amendment, p. 1687 13. Home Department – The Future of Law Enforcement – Establishment of a Law Enforcement Commission, p. 1703 14. Health and Social Services Department – The Children (Guernsey and Alderney) Law, 2008 – Children and Young People’s Plan 2011 – 2013, p. 1712 15. Education Department – The Reorganisation of Secondary Education Stage 2: The Rebuilding of Les Beaucamps High -
P.160-2013 Com.(2) [PPC Additional Comments]
STATES OF JERSEY ELECTED SPEAKER OF THE STATES (P.160/2013): ADDITIONAL COMMENTS Presented to the States on 17th April 2014 by the Privileges and Procedures Committee STATES GREFFE 2013 Price code: C P.160 Com.(2) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS The PPC presented comments to the States on 16th December 2013 on the proposition of the Connétable of St. Helier – Elected Speaker of the States (P.160/2013 Com.), but has since been asked to provide members with additional information about how a post of Elected Speaker could work in practice in Jersey if the States decided to support the proposition. These additional comments are in 4 parts. Section 1 sets out possible options for a post of Elected Speaker in Jersey. Section 2 reproduces a letter that the Bailiff sent to PPC on 25th January 2011 after the publication of the ‘Carswell’ Report. During his recent presentation to States members, Lord Carswell referred to the Bailiff’s letter and in the interests of fairness, PPC is recirculating the letter which was originally published in R.28/2011. Section 3 gives the text of the presentation that Lord Carswell made to members at the Jersey Museum on 27th March 2014, so that this is placed in the official record and made available to members who were not able to attend. Section 4 sets out the legal opinion given to the Carswell Panel by Mr. Rabinder Singh, Q.C. that was also referred to by Lord Carswell during his recent presentation. Page - 2 P.160/2013 Com.(2) SECTION 1 – OPTIONS FOR AN ELECTED SPEAKER IN JERSEY Introduction 1. -
Jurats As Adjudicators in the Channel Islands and the Importance of Lay Participation
Jurats as Adjudicators in the Channel Islands and the Importance of Lay Participation Timothy Hanson*1 Abstract: Many legal systems place great importance upon lay per sons adjudicating in courts and tribunals but how those persons are chosen, the precise role that they perform and the qualities that they are supposed to bring to the legal process are issues that often excite lively debate. This paper is about the Channel Islands, which enjoy as part of their legal systems adjudicators known as Jures-Justiciers or 'Jurats' who normally have no legal qualifications or training before being able to take up such posts. Historically, the Jurats have played an essential part in the Channel Islands being able to maintain their curious constitu tional position in the British Isles by their knowledge and application of the customary laws prevailing in each island and their jealous protection of such customs from outside interference. Nevertheless, in the twenty first century, when legal principle from one jurisdiction can more readily influence the development of law in another related system and public expectations are no less demanding than elsewhere in the British Isles, it is important to reassess the role of the Jurats. In so doing, it will be readily appreciated that the Jurat system, albeit in need of some reform, is no mere curiosity of the past but something of which Channel Islanders can be justifiably proud. Keywords: bailiff, bailiwick, Channel Islands, diversity, Guernsey, Jersey, Jurat, Jure-Justicier, Jure-Justicier Suppleant, lay participation I. Introduction The Channel Islands consist of two separate 'bailiwicks', being the old term for an area of jurisdiction under a bailie or Bailiff: one compris ing Jersey, the other Guernsey and a number of her dependent islands, notably including Alderney and Sark. -
Channel Islands
The Foundation of the International Association of Defense Counsel INTERNATIONAL BEST PRACTICES SURVEY This document is a resource tool only. The information was compiled in 2015, and this survey was updated in 2016. Please verify all current laws and regulations before proceeding as items could have changed since the time of publication. CHANNEL ISLANDS Responses submitted by: Name: Andrew Laws and Tim Molton Law Firm/Company: Babbé Location: St Peter Port, Guernsey, Channel Islands 1. Would your jurisdiction be described as a common law or civil code jurisdiction? Common law jurisdiction 2. What method of adjudication is used (adversarial, inquisitorial, other or hybrid)? Adversarial 3. What are the qualifications of the adjudicator (judge – elected, appointed; jury; other)? The Bailiff is the jurisdiction’s senior Judge. The Bailiff is, ex officio a Judge of the Court of Appeal and that Court’s president. He also sits in the Royal Court, either as a single Judge or presiding over certain sittings with the Jurats (see below). The Bailiff is appointed by the Crown and holds position until retirement age. The Bailiff has a Deputy, the Deputy Bailiff. In addition, there are a number of Judges of the Royal Court who are appointed by the Court itself, and Lieutenant Bailiffs, who are appointed by the Bailiff and may not serve for longer than the duration of the office of the Bailiff who appointed them. Some of these, typically Queen’s Counsel from England and Wales, are resident outside of the Island. Finally, there are the Jurats of the Royal Court who are elected by the States of Election. -
THIRD SECTION CASE of Mcgonnell V. the UNITED
CONSEIL COUNCIL DE L’EUROPE OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS THIRD SECTION CASE OF McGONNELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (Application no. 28488/95) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 8 February 2000 McGONNELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM JUDGMENT 1 In the case of McGonnell v. the United Kingdom, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Mr J.-P. COSTA, President, Mr P. KŪRIS, Mrs F. TULKENS, Mr W. FUHRMANN, Mr K. JUNGWIERT, Mrs H.S. GREVE, judges, Sir John LAWS, ad hoc judge, and Mrs S. DOLLÉ, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 28 September 1999, 25 January and 1 February 2000, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on the last- mentioned date: PROCEDURE 1. The case was referred to the Court by the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) on 4 December 1998, within the three- month period laid down by former Articles 32 § 1 and 47 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”). 2. The case originated in an application (no. 28488/95) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Commission under former Article 25 by a British national, Mr Richard James Joseph McGonnell (“the applicant”), on 29 June 1995. 3. The Commission’s request referred to former Articles 44 and 48 and to the declaration whereby the United Kingdom recognised the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court (former Article 46). The object of the request was to obtain a decision as to whether the facts of the case disclosed a breach by the respondent State of its obligations under Article 6 of the Convention.